Characterisation of Gs activation by dopamine D1 receptors using an antibody capture assay: antagonist properties of clozapine

Herein, we examined the direct coupling of human dopamine D1 receptors to G(s) proteins using an antibody capture assay together with a detection technique employing scintillation proximity assay beads. Using a specific antibody, dopamine (DA) and the selective dopamine D1 receptor agonists, 6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF81297) and 3-allyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF82958), behaved as high-efficacy agonists ( approximately 100%) in stimulating guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)-triphosphate ([35S]GTP gamma S) binding to G(s) in L-cells, whereas 2,3,4,5,-tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF38393) displayed partial agonist properties (70%). The action of dopamine was specifically mediated by human dopamine D1 receptors inasmuch as the selective human dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, (R)-(+)-8-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-benzazepine-7-ol (SCH23390), blocked dopamine-induced [35S]GTP gamma S binding to G(s) with a pK(B) (9.29) close to its pK(i) (9.33). The antipsychotic agents, clozapine and haloperidol, displayed no intrinsic activity when tested alone and inhibited dopamine-stimulated G(s) activation with pK(B)'s of 6.7 and 7.3, respectively, values close to their pK(i) values at these sites. In conclusion, the use of an anti-G(s) protein immunoprecipitation assay coupled to scintillation proximity assays allows direct evaluation of the functional activity of dopamine D1 receptors ligands at the G protein level. Employing this novel technique, the typical and atypical antipsychotics, clozapine and haloperidol, respectively, both exhibited antagonist properties at dopamine D1 receptors.     

Synthesis and renal vasodilator activity of 2-chlorodopamine and N-substituted derivatives

A four-step synthesis of 2-chlorodopamine (2b) is presented as well as methods for the syntheses of the N-methyl, ethyl, and n-propyl analogues (2c-e). Compounds 2b and 2c were essentially equipotent to dopamine for increasing renal blood flow in anesthetized dogs that had been treated with the alpha-adrenergic antagonist phenoxybenzamine. The increases in renal blood flow were blocked by the DA1 antagonist (R)-(+)-8-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine. Compounds 2d and 2e were significantly less potent than dopamine in the same model; the increases in renal blood flow were attenuated by propranolol and blocked by a combination of propranolol and (R)-(+)-8-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine. The significance of an o-chloro substituent on dopamine analogues for the activation of the DA1 receptor is briefly discussed.     

Differential activation of adenylate cyclase and receptor internalization by novel dopamine D1 receptor agonists

Structurally dissimilar dopamine D(1) receptor agonists were compared with dopamine in their ability to activate adenylate cyclase and to internalize hemagglutinin-tagged human D(1) receptors in a stably transfected human embryonic kidney cell line. Thirteen dopamine D(1) receptor agonists were selected rationally from three different structural classes: rigid fused ring compounds [dihydrexidine, dinapsoline, dinoxyline, apomorphine, and (5aR,11bS)-4,5,5a,6,7,11b-hexahydro-2-propyl-3-thia-5-azacyclopent-1-ena[c]-phenanthrene-9,10-diol (A86929)]; isochromans [(1R,3S)-3-(1'adamantyl)-1-aminomethyl-3,4-dihydo-5,6-dihydroxy-1H-2-benzopyran (A77636) and (1R,3S)-3-phenyl-1-aminomethyl-3,4-dihydo-5,6-dihydroxy-1H-2-benzopyran (A68930)]; and benzazepines [7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF38393), (+/-)-7,8-dihydroxy-3-allyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF77434), 6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-3-allyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF82958), 3-methyl-6-chloro-7,8-hydroxy-1-[3-methylphenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-]H-3-benzazepine (SKF83959), R(+)-6-chloro-7,8,-dihydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF82957), and R(+)-6-chloro-7,8,-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF81297)]. The working hypothesis was that some agonists have differential effects on adenylate cyclase versus receptor internalization that could be correlated to the structural class of the agonist. First, the affinity for the hemagglutinin-hD(1) receptor and the intrinsic activity and potency of adenylate cyclase activation were determined for each compound. The internalization time course and internalization efficacy were then determined for each agonist. It was surprising that internalization efficacy was found to be independent of either agonist structural class or affinity. Only agonists that had both high adenylate cyclase functional potency and high intrinsic activity caused internalization. In addition, four agonists from two structural classes were identified that were capable of fully activating adenylate cyclase without eliciting an internalization response. This study provides the first extensive characterization of D(1) receptor internalization in response to structurally diverse agonists and, at least for the D(1) receptor, shows that functional selectivity is not predictable by simple structural examination. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that functional selectivity reflects subtle ligand-induced conformational changes as opposed to simple agonist trafficking among discrete receptor active states.     

Cholecystokinin octapeptide potentiates the inhibitory response mediated by D2 dopamine receptors in slices of the ventral tegmental area of the brain in the rat

The ability of cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK8) to modulate dopamine (DA)-induced inhibition of the firing of neurons in the ventral tegmental area of the rat was examined. Extracellular recordings were obtained from putative DA-containing neurons, identified on the basis of their electrophysiological characteristics and response to DA, in an in vitro slice preparation from the ventral tegmental area of the brain. Application of DA produced a concentration-dependent reduction in firing rate. This DA-induced inhibition was mimicked by the D2 selective agonist, LY 171555 (trans-(-)-4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a,9-octahydro-5-propyl-2H- pyrazolo[3,4-g]quinoline), but not by the D1 selective agonist, SKF 38393 (R-(+)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine). The DA-induced inhibition was antagonized selectively by the D2 antagonist, l-sulpiride, but not by the D1 antagonist, SCH 23390 (R-(+)-8-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine-7- ol). However, CCK8 elicited a transient increase in firing rate in some neurons and, in addition, potentiated the inhibitory response evoked by DA or LY 171555. Again SKF 38393 was without effect following the administration of CCK8. Taken together, these results suggest that DA-induced inhibition of DA-containing neurons in the ventral tegmental area of the brain of the rat is mediated by activation of D2-receptors and that CCK8 potentiates this D2-mediated inhibition.     

In vivo assessment of release and metabolism of dopamine in the ventrolateral striatum of awake rats following administration of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor agonists and antagonists

The ability of specific dopamine (DA) receptor agonists and antagonists to modify the release and metabolism of DA in the ventrolateral striatum of awake rats was assessed using in vivo microdialysis. The specific DA D₂ receptor antagonist, raclopride (0.1, 0.5 and 2.0mg/kg, i.p.), dose-dependently increased release of DA and levels of the metabolites DOPAC and HVA, while the D₂ receptor agonist, quinpirole (0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg), decreased levels of DA, DOPAC and HVA. The DA D₁ receptor antagonist, SCH23390 ([R + (+)-8-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepin-7-o]) (0.01, 0.05 and 0.25 mg/kg), produced an increase in DA, DOPAC and HVA but of a lesser magnitude than raclopride. The D₁ agonist SKF38393 (1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-(1H)-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol) (1.0, 3.0 and 10.0 mg/kg) failed to affect the release of metabolism of DA at any dose. These results support previous findings that activation of D₂ receptors has greater control over in vivo DA function, than drugs specifically affecting D₁ receptors.     

Dopamine autoreceptors and the effects of drugs on locomotion and dopamine synthesis.

Criteria for distinguishing dopamine autoreceptor agonism from other mechanisms of inhibiting locomotion were examined, together with the relationship between inhibition of locomotion and dopamine synthesis. ED50 potencies to inhibit locomotion of mice were established for drugs from a number of categories. Spiperone 0.02 mg kg-1 significantly (P less than 0.05) reversed inhibition of locomotion by known dopamine agonists but not that by the other types of drug. Idazoxan antagonized inhibition of locomotion due to alpha 2-agonists but not dopamine agonists. RU 24926 (N-propyl-N,N-di[2-(3-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]amine) was antagonized by both spiperone and idazoxan. Only for dopamine agonists was there good correlation (r = 0.97) between potencies to inhibit locomotion in mice and L-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) accumulation in the nucleus accumbens of rats treated with gamma-butyrolactone and 3-hydroxybenzylhydrazine. The specific dopamine D1-agonist, SK&F 38393 (2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine), was inactive in both tests at doses up to 10 mg kg-1. The mixed dopamine agonist/antagonist, (-)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-propylpiperidine, commonly known as (-)-3-PPP, acted as a dopamine agonist in both tests but inhibited locomotion more potently than L-DOPA accumulation. The inhibitory effects of dopamine agonists on locomotion were not prevented by alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine pretreatment. The data suggest that spiperone-reversible inhibition of locomotion in mice is a good criterion for dopamine autoreceptor agonists. The receptors involved are affected by low doses of both dopamine agonists and antagonists and seem similar to those involved in the autoreceptor mediated inhibition of dopamine synthesis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Ventral striatal vs. accumbal (shell) mechanisms and non-cyclase-coupled dopamine D(1)-like receptors in jaw movements.

This study compared the effects of intracerebral injections of the dopamine D(1)-like receptor agents 3-methyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-[3-methylphenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SK&F 83959) and [R]-3-methyl-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SCH 23390) into the ventrolateral striatum or the shell of the nucleus accumbens on the synergistic induction of jaw movements by intravenous (i.v.) co-administration of [R]-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SK&F 38393) or SK&F 83959 with the dopamine D(2)-like receptor agonist, quinpirole. In the ventrolateral striatum, SCH 23390 and SK&F 83959 each blocked jaw movements induced by i.v. SK&F 38393 with quinpirole, while only SCH 23390 blocked i.v. SK&F 83959 with quinpirole. SCH 23390 was less effective in the accumbens shell than in the ventrolateral striatum, and SK&F 83959 was ineffective to block i.v. SK&F 38393 with quinpirole, while neither SCH 23390 nor SK&F 83959 blocked i.v. SK&F 83959 with quinpirole. As SK&F 83959 inhibits the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase via dopamine D(1A) receptors but acts as an agonist at a putative dopamine D(1)-like receptor site not linked to cyclase, an important role is indicated for non-cyclase-coupled dopamine D(1)-like receptor sites as well as dopamine D(1A) receptors in the regulation of jaw movements via dopamine D(1)-like/D(2)-like receptor synergism, particularly in the ventrolateral striatum.     

Dopamine D1 receptor agonists induce penile erections in rats

The dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine has been recently introduced in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. While it is well established that dopamine D2-like receptors play a crucial role in this effect, conflicting result are reported in the literature as for the role of dopamine D1-like receptors. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of systemic administration of dopamine D1-like receptor agonists on penile erection in rats. Male Wistar rats were treated with three different, and not structurally related, dopamine D1-like receptor agonists: the partial agonists SKF38393 ((+) 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine) and CY 208-243 ((-)-4,6,6a,7,8,12b-exahydro-7-methylindole [4,3-ab]fenantridine), and the full agonist A 77636 ((-)-(1R,3S)-3-Adamantyl-1-(aminomethyl)-3,4-dihydro-5,6-dihydroxy-1H-2-benzopyran hydrochloride). All three compounds dose-dependently increased the number of penile erections, with the full agonist A77636 showing a more pronounced effect with respect to the other two. Moreover, the dopamine D1-like receptor antagonist SCH 23390 ((R)-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) dose-dependently antagonised A77636 effect. These results show that systemic administration of dopamine D1-like receptor agonists induce penile erection in rats. This observation suggests that dopamine D1-like receptor agonists might be considered as a possible alternative to apomorphine in the treatment of erectile dysfunction, thus avoiding the typical side effects related to the stimulation of dopamine D2-like receptors such as nausea.     

Effects of dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists at peripheral neuronal and vascular dopamine receptors in the anaesthetised dog

The interactions between several putative dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists have been examined at neuronal and vascular dopamine receptors in the femoral and mesenteric vascular beds, respectively, of anaesthetised dogs. N,N-di-n- propyldopamine (DPDA) and apomorphine caused vasodilatation in both vascular beds. Cis alpha-flupenthixol, fluphenazine, and sulpiride were much more potent at antagonising DPDA at neuronal than at vascular dopamine receptors. Fluphenazine and sulpiride were as potent against apomorphine as against DPDA at neuronal receptors, but cis alpha-flupenthixol was much less effective. Fluphenazine antagonised the vasodilator effect of apomorphine in the mesenteric vascular bed, but cis alpha-flupenthixol and sulpiride did not, even when used in doses much larger than were effective against DPDA. Further experiments, in dogs pretreated with phenoxybenzamine and propranolol, revealed that cis alpha-flupenthixol, fluphenazine, and sulpiride also antagonised the mesenteric vasodilator effects of dopamine, 2-amino-5,6-dihydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene, 2-amino-6,7-dihydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene, and 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine, suggesting a common site of action of these drugs and DPDA. Only fluphenazine antagonised responses to apomorphine. The results support the view that neuronal and vascular dopamine receptors in the dog are different. They also show that apomorphine stimulates different receptors from DPDA in the mesenteric vascular bed and, perhaps, in the femoral vascular bed as well.     

A study on the contribution of the 1-phenyl substituent to the molecular electrostatic potentials of some benzazepines in relation to selective dopamine D-1 receptor activity.

The molecular electrostatic potentials for a selective dopamine D-1 receptor antagonist, 7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-methylbenzazepine (SCH 23390 (1], and a selective dopamine D-1 receptor agonist, 7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SK&F 38393 (2], have been calculated in order to obtain an understanding of the nature of the interactions between the phenyl ring and the receptor. Analogues of 1 with conformationally constrained phenyl rings have also been studied. Based on this study, the conclusion is drawn that an important part of the interaction between the phenyl ring in the benzazepines and the receptor is due to electrostatic forces, and that the phenyl ring interacts with the same receptor site as the oxygen atom of the 8-hydroxy group.     

Catalepsy-associated behavior induced by dopamine D1 receptor antagonists and partial dopamine D1 receptor agonists in squirrel monkeys

Observational procedures were used to compare the behavioral effects of dopamine D₁ receptor antagonists and partial dopamine D₁ receptor agonists in squirrel monkeys. The dopamine D₁ receptor antagonists SCH 39166 ((−)-tran-6- 7,7a,8,9,13b-hexahydro-3-chloro-2-hydroxy-N-methyl-5H-benzo(d)naphtho-(2,1-b)azepine) and BW 737C89 ([S]-6-chloro-1[2,5-dimethoxy-4-propylbenzyl]- hydroxy-2-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline) produced dose-related increases in the duration of static and unusual postures, indicative of catalepsy. R-SKF 38393 (R(+)-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-[1H]-3-benzazepine) and SKF 75670 (7,8-dihydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-[1H]-3-benzazepine), which are considered partial dopamine D₁ receptor agonists, also consistently produced dose-related increases in catalepsy-associated behavior and had effects comparable in magnitude to those of dopamine D₁ receptor antagonists. In contrast, the higher efficacy D₁ agonists SKF 81297 (6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-[1H]-3-benzazepine) and SKF 82958 (6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4, 5-tetrahydro-3-allylp-[1H]-3-benzazepine) did not produce catalepsy-associated behavior at any dose tested. The results indicate that dopamine D₁ agonists differ with respect to cataleptogenic activity, possibly reflecting differences in intrinsic activity.     

Endomorphins 1 and 2 induce amnesia via selective modulation of dopamine receptors in mice

The involvement of dopamine receptors in the amnesic effects of the endogenous micro-opioid receptor agonists endomorphins 1 and 2 was investigated by observing step-down type passive avoidance learning in mice. Although the dopamine D1 receptor agonist R(+)-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol hydrochloride (R(+)-SKF38393) (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg), the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (R(+)-SCH23390) (2.5 and 5 microg/kg) or the dopamine D2 receptor agonist N-n-phenethyl-N-propylethyl-p-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-ethylamine (RU24213) (0.3 and 1 mg/kg) had no significant effects on the endomorphin-1 (10 microg)- or endomorphin-2 (10 microg)-induced decrease in step-down latency of passive avoidance learning, (-)-sulpiride (10 mg/kg), a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, significantly reversed the decrease in step-down latency evoked by endomorphin-2 (10 microg), but not by endomorphin-1 (10 microg). Taken together, it is likely that stimulation of dopamine D2 receptors results in the endomorphin-2-but not endomorphin-1-induced impairment of passive avoidance learning.     

Effects of dopaminergic agents on carrageenan hyperalgesia after intrathecal administration to rats

The present study explored the role of dopaminergic transmission in spinal cord in a model of carrageenan-induced inflammatory pain by examining the effects of selective agonists and antagonists of dopamine receptors. The results were as follows: (1) trans-(-)-4aR-4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a,9-octahydro-5-propyl-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-g] quinoline hydrochloride (LY171555), a dopamine D(2) receptor agonist, produced anti-hyperalgesia (150 and 300 nmol) or hypoalgesia (300 nmol) in the inflamed hindpaws and non-inflamed hindpaws, respectively; spiperone hydrochloride (8-[4-(4-fluorophenyl)-4-oxobutyl]-1-phenyl-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4,5]decan-4-one hydrochloride), a dopamine D(2) receptor antagonist, decreased the pain threshold of non-inflamed hindpaws (300 nmol). (2) (+/-)-SKF38393 hydrochloride ((+/-)-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-(1H)-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol hydrochloride), a dopamine D(1) receptor agonist, had no effect on either hindpaw, even at a higher dose (300 nmol); R(+)-7-Chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (R(+)-SCH23390 hydrochloride), a dopamine D(1) receptor antagonist, induced anti-hyperalgesia in the inflamed hindpaws (300 nmol). The present results suggest that the dopaminergic system in the spinal cord is involved in the central modulation of inflammatory hyperalgesia, and that the different effects are probably induced by different receptors.     

(+/-)-3-allyl-7-halo-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepines as selective high affinity D1 dopamine receptor antagonists: synthesis and structure-activity relationship.

Substituted 1-phenyl-3-benzazepines form a class of compounds possessing potent and selective affinity for the D1 DA receptor. 7,8-Dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF 38393) and its 6-halo analogues are potent and selective D1 receptor agonists. Recently, the 3-allyl derivatives of SKF 38393 and its analogues were described as selective D1 agonists with higher D1 efficacy and CNS potency. In order to extend these results to compounds in the 7-halo-8-hydroxy-substituted antagonist series, we have synthesized and pharmacologically characterized 3-allyl analogues of 7-substituted (Cl, Br, H) 8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepines. These 3-allyl derivatives were compared with their 3-methyl and 3-unsubstituted analogues in terms of their D1 receptor affinity and selectivity. The results have been used to generate structure-affinity relationships. The D1 receptor affinity, for 3-substitution, is found to be in the order: methyl greater than allyl greater than H. For 7-substitution, the affinity is in the order: Cl = Br greater than H. The 3-allyl compounds show affinity close to that of the parent (3-methyl) compounds while exhibiting a slightly diminished D1 selectivity. However, the greater lipophilicity of the 3-allyl compounds may enable them to cross the blood-brain barrier more readily and thereby exhibit higher in vivo CNS potency. Thus 3-allylbenzazepines have potential as high affinity selective D1 antagonists.     

SK&F 83822 distinguishes adenylyl cyclase from phospholipase C-coupled dopamine D1-like receptors: behavioural topography

Effects of SK&F 83822 [3-allyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-(3-methylphenyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine], an agonist at dopamine D1-like receptors which stimulate adenylyl cyclase but not phosphoinositide hydrolysis, were studied topographically so as to clarify differences between these receptors in the regulation of behaviour. Using cloned receptors, SK&F 83822 showed high, selective affinity for dopamine D1 and D5 over D2, D3, D4 and several non-dopamine receptors. SK&F 83822 induced little intense grooming, but readily induced sniffing, locomotion and rearing; seizures were evident at higher doses, characterised by tonic convulsions, forepaw myoclonus and explosive hyperlocomotion. The dopamine D1-like receptor antagonist SCH 23390 [R(+)-3-methyl-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine] readily antagonised these responses to SK&F 83822, particularly seizure activity. The dopamine D2-like receptor antagonist YM 09151-2 [cis-N-(1-benzyl-2-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl)-5-chloro-2-methoxy-4-methylaminobenzamide] did not alleviate seizures induced by SK&F 83822; YM 09151-02 did, however, attenuate SK&F 83822-induced sniffing, locomotion and rearing, and released vacuous chewing. These findings indicate that dopamine D1-like receptors linked to adenylyl cyclase can be differentiated from those not linked to adenylyl cyclase in terms of their roles in the topographical regulation of behaviour. For example, the seizure and vacuous chewing responses appear to involve dopamine D1-like receptors that stimulate adenylyl cyclase, while intense grooming involves those which do not.     

Classic D1 dopamine receptor antagonist R-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (SCH23390) directly inhibits G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channels

R-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (SCH23390) is a widely used, highly selective antagonist of D1 dopamine receptors. While investigating the crosstalk between D1 and D3 dopamine receptor signaling pathways, we discovered that in addition to being a D1 receptor antagonist, SCH23390 and related compounds inhibit G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels. We present evidence that SCH23390 blocks endogenous GIRK currents induced by either somatostatin or D3 dopamine receptors in AtT-20 cells (IC50, 268 nM). The inhibition is receptor-independent because constitutive GIRK currents in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing only GIRK channels are also blocked by SCH23390. The inhibition of GIRK channels is somewhat selective because members of the closely related Kir2.0 family of inwardly rectifying potassium channels, as well as various endogenous cationic currents present in AtT-20 cells, are not affected. In addition, in current clamp recordings, SCH23390 can depolarize the membrane potential and induce AtT-20 cells to fire action potentials, indicating potential physiological significance of the GIRK channel inhibition. To identify the chemical features that contribute to GIRK channel block, we tested several structurally related compounds [SKF38393, R-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (nor-methyl-SCH23390), and R-(+)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-8-iodo-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepin-7-ol hydrochloride (iodo-SCH23390)], and our results indicate that the halide atom is critical for blocking GIRK channels. Taken together, our results suggest that SCH23390 and related compounds might provide the basis for designing novel GIRK channel-selective blockers. Perhaps more importantly, some studies that have exclusively used SCH23390 to probe D1 receptor function or as a diagnostic of D1 receptor involvement may need to be reevaluated in light of these results.     

Hyperthermia induced by the dopamine D1 receptor agonist SK&F38393 in combination with the dopamine D2 receptor agonist talipexole in the rat.

The present experiments were performed to investigate the effects of dopamine D1 receptor agonists given alone or in combination with dopamine D2 receptor agonists on body temperature in rats. The selective dopamine D1 receptor agonist, 1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-(1H)-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol (SK&F38393), produced hyperthermia. However, the dopamine D2 receptor agonist, B-HT 920 (talipexole), and the newly synthesized dopamine D2 receptor agonist, (S)-2-amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-propylamino-benzothiazole (SND 919), did not change the temperature. Interestingly, the SK&F38393-induced hyperthermia was enhanced by talipexole and SND 919. The drastic hyperthermia induced by combined administration of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor agonists was blocked by either the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH23390, or the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, spiperone. On the other hand, treatment with prazosin, yohimbine, propranolol, scopolamine, or methysergide failed to affect the marked hyperthermia. The present results suggest that a functional link between dopamine D1 and D2 receptors may be synergistic in the regulation of body temperature and that concurrent stimulation of both dopamine D1 and D2 receptors thereby produces marked hyperthermia in the rat.     

Conformational analysis and structure-activity relationships of selective dopamine D-1 receptor agonists and antagonists of the benzazepine series

Comprehensive conformational analysis using molecular mechanics calculations (MM2(85)) has been carried out for the potent and selective dopamine D-1 receptor agonist 7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (1; SK&F 38393), the antagonist 7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (8; SCH 23390), and several analogues, including conformationally constrained ones. Calculated conformational energies have been related to pharmacological and biochemical data in an attempt to identify the biologically active conformations of 1 and 8. It is concluded that the most probable receptor-bound conformation in both cases is a chair conformation with an equatorial phenyl ring and for 8 an equatorial N-methyl group. It is suggested that the orientation of the phenyl ring in the receptor-bound molecule does not deviate in terms of dihedral angles by more than about 30 degrees from the preferred phenyl group rotamer in which the planes of two aromatic rings are essentially orthogonal.     

Topographical assessment and pharmacological characterization of orofacial movements in mice: dopamine D(1)-like vs. D(2)-like receptor regulation

A novel procedure for the assessment of orofacial movement topographies in mice was used to study, for the first time, the individual and interactive involvement of dopamine D(1)-like vs. D(2)-like receptors in their regulation. The dopamine D(1)-like receptor agonists A 68930 ([1R,3S]-1-aminomethyl-5,6-dihydroxy-3-phenyl-isochroman) and SK&F 83959 (3-methyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-[3-methyl-phenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) each induced vertical jaw movements with tongue protrusions and incisor chattering. The dopamine D(1)-like receptor antagonists SCH 23390 ([R]-3-methyl-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) and BW 737C ([S]-6-chloro-1-[2,5-dimethoxy-4-propylbenzyl]-7-hydroxy-2-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline) antagonised these responses, while the dopamine D(2)-like receptor antagonist YM 09151-2 (cis-N-[1-benzyl-2-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl]-5-chloro-2-methoxy-4-methylaminobenzamide) attenuated those to SK&F 83959 and released horizontal jaw movements. These findings suggest some role for a dopamine D(1)-like receptor that is coupled to a transduction system other than/additional to adenylyl cyclase, and for dopamine D(1)-like:D(2)-like receptor interactions, in the regulation of individual orofacial movement topographies in the mouse. This methodology will allow the use of knockout mice to clarify the roles of individual dopamine receptor subtypes in their regulation.     

Topographical resolution of jaw movements mediated by cyclase- vs. non-cyclase-coupled dopamine D(1)-like receptors: studies with SK&F 83822

This study examined the effects on orofacial movement topography of SK&F 83822 ([R/S]-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-3-allyl-1-[3-methylphenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine), which stimulates dopamine D(1)-like receptors coupled to stimulation of adenylyl cyclase (AC) but not phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis, in comparison with SK&F 83959 ([R/S]-3-methyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-[3-methyl-phenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine), which stimulates PI hydrolysis but not AC. SK&F 83822 alone induced chattering, while SK&F 83959 alone exerted little effect. SK&F 83822 and SK&F 83959 each in combination with the dopamine D(2)-like agonist quinpirole resulted in synergistic induction of non-chattering movements with tongue protrusions. These effects were blocked by the dopamine D(1)-like receptor antagonist SCH 23390 ([R]-3-methyl-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine). However, the dopamine D(2)-like receptor antagonist YM 09151-2 (cis-N-[1-benzyl-2-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl]-5-chloro-2-methoxy-4-methylaminobenzamide) exerted a biphasic effect on synergism with SK&F 83822: chattering was initially released but antagonised thereafter. Only antagonism was seen for synergism with SK&F 83959. While both AC- and PI-coupled dopamine D(1)-like receptors participate in synergistic dopamine D(1)-like:D(2)-like receptor interactions, topographically specific synergistic and oppositional dopamine D(1)-like:D(2)-like interactions evident with SK&F 83822 reflect the involvement primarily of D(1)-like receptors coupled to AC rather than PI.