Care concordant with guidelines predicts decreased long-term mortality in patients with unstable angina pectoris and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Data are sparse regarding the long-term benefit of care concordant with clinical practice guidelines in patients presenting with unstable angina pectoris and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (UAP/NSTEMI), particularly in the general care setting. We extended follow-up in a preexisting cohort of 275 patients hospitalized with primary UAP/NSTEMI. Using Cox models, we compared long-term mortality between patients who received care concordant with > or =80% of 8 important guideline recommendations during the index hospitalization and patients who did not. Among all study patients, 68% received guideline-concordant care. During follow-up (median 9.4 years) 49% of patients died. Patients with UAP/NSTEMI who received guideline-concordant care had significantly decreased long-term mortality compared with those who received guideline-discordant care (hazards ratio [HR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32 to 0.64). Guideline-concordant care remained associated with decreased mortality after adjusting for other predictors of long-term mortality (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.84) and after adjustment for the propensity to receive guideline-concordant care (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.88). The benefit of guideline-concordant care relative to discordant care was preserved in high-risk populations shown to be less likely to receive guideline-concordant care, including patients with advanced age, congestive heart failure, elevated serum creatinine, and prior myocardial infarction. Care concordant with UAP/NSTEMI clinical practice guidelines is associated with substantially improved long-term survival. Our findings endorse the approach adopted by authors of clinical practice guidelines in generalizing evidence-based medicine to usual clinical care. In firmly establishing the benefit of consensus guidelines, the foundation is set for efforts to improve practitioner compliance with these standards.     

Prodromal unstable angina in acute myocardial infarction: prognostic value of short- and long-term outcome and predictor of infarct size

BACKGROUND: An estimated 50% of patients with myocardial infarction have prodromal unstable angina. There is controversy over whether prodromal unstable angina identifies a group of patients at lower risk of short- and long-term death and the clinical importance of recording this event. METHODS: Of 207 patients enrolled at a single Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) site, 196 survived the 24 hours after presentation, achieved peak creatine kinase MB concentrations, and were classified as having either abrupt symptom onset or prodromal unstable angina in the 2 weeks before myocardial infarction. Creatine kinase MB peak was used to categorize infarct size as aborted myocardial infarction, minor myocardial damage, or extensive myocardial injury. Follow-up was performed at 24 hours, 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years. Multiple variables, including prodromal unstable angina, time to treatment, age, sex, previous infarction and infarct location, were analyzed for predicting infarct size. Also, these variables plus peak creatine kinase MB level and a combined variable of prodromal unstable angina and peak creatine kinase MB level were examined for predicting survival. RESULTS: Mortality rate was 2.5% within 24 hours, 9.0% at 30 days, 13.5% at 1 year, and 27.1% at 5 years. Patients categorized as either aborted infarction or minor myocardial damage were significantly more likely to have prodromal unstable symptoms (81.3% vs 51.2%, P <.001) and better survival at each follow-up period. Prodromal presentation was the most significant predictor of infarct size category (P =.001). Five-year survival was predicted by age (P <.0001), peak creatine kinase MB level (P =.007), infarct location (P =.009), the combined variables (P =.029), and prodromal unstable angina (P =.017). Prodromal unstable angina had the highest odds ratio for 5-year survival at 3.83 (95% confidence interval 1.27-11.47). CONCLUSIONS: Prodromal unstable angina is a strong predictor of infarct size and survival. Recognizing prodromal unstable angina is important for clinically assessing prognosis.     

Outcomes of myocardial infarction in hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention facilities

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence on the efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with acute myocardial infarction, it is unclear whether patients admitted to hospitals with on-site PCI facilities (herein after, PCI hospitals) have improved outcomes in routine practice. METHODS: We compared processes of care, hospital outcomes, and 1-year mortality rate for 1176 consecutive patients admitted to 126 PCI hospitals and 738 patients admitted to 190 non-PCI hospitals in France from November 1 to November 30, 2000. RESULTS: Patients admitted to PCI hospitals were more likely to receive evidence-based acute (within 48 hours of admission) and discharge medications and to undergo PCI within 48 hours of admission than those admitted to non-PCI hospitals (54% vs 6.2%; P<.001). Despite comparable rates of in-hospital stroke (0.9% vs 1.1%; P=.75) and reinfarction (1.7% vs 2.5%; P=.25), patients admitted to PCI vs non-PCI hospitals had lower in-hospital (7.5% vs 12%; P=.001) and 1-year (13% vs 20%; P<.001) mortality rates. Admission to PCI hospitals was associated with decreased hazard ratios of mortality after adjusting for baseline characteristics (0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.98) or propensity score (0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.97). Most of the survival benefit of admission to a PCI hospital was explained by the use of PCI and evidence-based discharge medications. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective observational study, admission of patients with acute myocardial infarction to PCI hospitals was associated with greater use of PCI and evidence-based medications and with improved 1-year survival. Although we cannot exclude the possibility that some unmeasured confounding factors might explain the survival benefit of admission to PCI hospitals, our findings support routine use of PCI and evidence-based medications for these patients.     

Beneficial effect of prodromal angina pectoris is lost in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: Prodromal angina pectoris occurring shortly before the onset of acute myocardial infarction is associated with a favorable outcome by the mechanism of ischemic preconditioning. Recent experiments have reported that the beneficial effect of ischemic preconditioning are reversed in the aged heart. METHODS: We studied 990 patients who underwent coronary angiography within 12 hours after the onset of acute myocardial infarction. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those aged <70 years (nonelderly patients, n = 722) and those aged >/=70 years (elderly patients, n = 268). Prodromal angina in the 24 hours before infarction was found in 190 of 722 nonelderly patients and in 66 of 268 elderly patients (26% vs 25%, P =.61). RESULTS: In nonelderly patients, prodromal angina was associated with lower peak creatine kinase levels (2438 +/- 1939 IU/L vs 2837 +/- 2341 IU/L, P =.04), lower in-hospital mortality rates (3.7% vs 8.8%, P =.02), and better 5-year survival rates (P =. 007). On the contrary, in elderly patients there was no significant difference in peak creatine kinase levels (2427 +/- 2142 IU/L vs 2256 +/- 1551 IU/L, P =.51), in-hospital mortality rate (21.2% vs 17. 4%, P =.49), and 5-year survival rates (P =.47). A multivariate analysis showed that prodromal angina in the 24 hours before infarction was associated with 5-year survival rate in nonelderly patients (odds ratio 0.49, P =.009) but not in elderly patients (odds ratio l.12, P =.65). CONCLUSIONS: In nonelderly patients, prodromal angina in the 24 hours before infarction was associated with a smaller infarct size and better short- and long-term survival, suggesting a relation to ischemic preconditioning. However, such a beneficial effect was not observed in elderly patients.     

Clinical practice guidelines in unstable angina improve clinical outcomes by assuring early intensive medical treatment

OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of clinical practice guidelines on treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in unstable angina and the effectiveness of guideline reminders on implementing practice guidelines, two groups of medium and high risk patients with unstable angina were compared. BACKGROUND: New guidelines have been published by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) for evaluating and managing patients with unstable angina. The impact of these guidelines to improve the quality of care has never been tested. METHODS: Group 1 included 338 consecutive medium or high risk patients admitted before publication of the AHCPR guidelines, and group 2 consisted of 181 consecutive similar risk patients admitted after institution of the AHCPR guideline reminders at this institution. Dissemination of clinical practice guidelines was ensured by a grand rounds lecture and by posting guideline reminders on all group 2 patients' charts within 24 h of admission. RESULTS: The two groups were similar in terms of most baseline characteristics, including hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, hypertension, smoking history, baseline ST segment depression and previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Group 1 patients were older (68+/-13 vs. 63+/-16 years, p = 0.001) and more frequently had a previous myocardial infarction (39% vs. 22%, p = 0.001). Group 2 patients more frequently required intravenous nitroglycerin to control the index episode of chest pain (43% vs. 34%, p = 0.003). Group 2 patients more frequently received aspirin (96% vs. 88%, p = 0.009) during admission and underwent coronary angiography (71% vs. 58%, p = 0.006). More importantly, group 2 patients received oral beta-blockers (p = 0.008), aspirin and coronary angiography (p = 0.001) earlier than group 1 patients and experienced recurrent angina (29% vs. 54%) and myocardial infarction or death less frequently (3% vs. 9%, p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: In unstable angina, clinical practice guidelines were associated with greater use of aspirin and coronary angiography and greater use and earlier administration of beta-blockers. Variation in drug use over time was also reduced. Objective improvement in clinical outcome was also noted. Thus, practice guidelines improve the quality of care of patients with unstable angina.     

Cardiac rehabilitation in patients with myocardial infarction: a 10-year follow-up study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Very little information is available on the effect of cardiac rehabilitation programs on long-term survival. The primary aim of this study was to assess the effect of a structured cardiac rehabilitation program on mortality in patients who had suffered acute myocardial infarction. The secondary endpoint was the effect on morbidity. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The study included 180 low-risk male patients aged under 65 years. Patients were randomly assigned to one of 2 groups: 90 entered into a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program, and 90 served as a control group. The mean follow-up period was 10 years. RESULTS: All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the intervention group: the 10-year survival rate was 91.8% in the intervention group compared with 81.7% in the control group (P=.04). There was also a decrease in cardiovascular mortality, though it was not statistically significant: the 10-year survival rate was 91.8% in the intervention group compared with 83.8% in the control group (P=.10). The incidence of non-fatal complications was lower in the intervention group (35.2% vs 63.2%, P=.03), as was the incidence of unstable angina (15.7% vs 33.9%, P =.02) and cardiac heart failure (3.0% vs 14.4%, P=.02), and the need for coronary intervention (8.4% vs 22.9%, P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: The application of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program significantly decreased long-term mortality and morbidity in low-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction.     

Race and sex differences in consistency of care with national asthma guidelines in managed care organizations.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, morbidity from asthma disproportionately affects African Americans and women. Although inadequate care contributes to overall asthma morbidity, less is known about differences in asthma care by race and sex. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: To examine the relationships of race and sex with asthma care, we analyzed responses to questionnaires administered to adults enrolled in 16 managed care organizations participating in the Outcomes Management System Asthma Study between September and December 1993. Indicators of care consistent with National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (1991) recommendations were assessed. Of a random sample of 8640 patients asked to participate, 6612 (77%) completed the survey. This study focused on 5062 (14% African American, 72% women) patients with at least moderate asthma symptom severity. RESULTS: Fewer African Americans than whites reported care consistent with recommendations for medication use (eg, daily inhaled corticosteroid use, 34.9% vs 54.4%; P =.001), self-management education (eg, action plan, 42.0% vs 53.8%; P =.001), avoiding triggers (37.6% vs 53.6%; P =.001), and specialist care (28.3% vs 41.0%; P =.001). Differences in asthma care by sex were smaller and tended to favor women except for daily inhaled corticosteroid use (women vs men: 49.6% vs 58.3%; P =.001) and having specialist care (37.7% vs 43.1%; P =.001). Similar race and sex differences were observed after adjusting for age, education, employment, and symptom frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Even among patients with health insurance, disparities in asthma care for African Americans compared with whites exist and may contribute to race disparities in outcomes. Women generally reported better asthma care but may benefit from greater use of inhaled corticosteroids.     

An educational intervention to improve antimicrobial use in a hospital-based long-term care facility

OBJECTIVES: To improve antimicrobial use in patients receiving long-term care (LTC).
DESIGN: Prospective, quasi-experimental before–after assessment of the effects of physician education and guideline implementation.
SETTING: Public LTC and acute care hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: Twenty salaried internists who provided most of the medical care to LTC patients.
INTERVENTION: National guidelines, hospital resistance data, and physician feedback were incorporated into a series of four teaching sessions presented over 18 months and into booklets detailing institutional guidelines on the optimal management of common LTC infection syndromes.
MEASUREMENTS: One hundred randomly selected LTC patients treated with antimicrobials were reviewed before these interventions were implemented and 100 after, and measures of the quality of care were compared. The effect of the interventions on antimicrobial days and starts were also assessed using interrupted time series analysis.
RESULTS: Charted clinical abnormalities met guideline diagnostic criteria (62% vs 38%, P =.006), and initial therapy agreed with guideline recommendations (39% vs 11%, P <.001), more often in the post- than in the preintervention cohort. Mean census-adjusted monthly LTC antimicrobial days fell 29.7%, and antimicrobial starts fell 25.9% during the intervention period; both decreases were sustained during the 2-year postintervention period.
CONCLUSION: The teaching and guideline intervention improved the quality and reduced the quantity of antimicrobial use in LTC patients.     

Effect of angina in the week before myocardial infarction on long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after hospital discharge

The occurrence of angina in the week preceding myocardial infarction is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular complications in the acute phase. However, little is known about it relationship with prognosis after hospitalization (e.g., cardiovascular death and the development of heart failure or ischemic cardiomyopathy). The study included 290 consecutive patients admitted for a first myocardial infarction: 107 (36.9%) had preceding angina while 183 did not. Those with a history of ischemic cardiomyopathy of more than 1 week or structural cardiopathy were excluded. There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Moreover, there was no difference in the rates of cardiovascular complications after hospital discharge: cardiovascular death (7% vs. 12.6%; P=.3), heart failure (7.4% vs. 11.6%; P=.2), and myocardial ischemia, including myocardial infarction and unstable angina, requiring hospitalization (41.2% vs. 31.3%; P=.3). The occurrence of angina in the week before a first myocardial infarction did not influence cardiovascular complications after hospital discharge (odds ratio = 0.75 [0.51-1.11]; P=.15).     

Clinical characteristics and long-term outcome in patients with heart failure complicating acute myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of heart failure (HF) development in patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). PATIENTS AND METHOD: Between May 1990 and March 2000, 836 consecutive patients were admitted with a diagnosis of AMI within 24 h of symptom onset. HF was defined as the presence of rales and a third heart sound with gallop, and evidence of pulmonary congestion on chest x-ray. It was diagnosed in 263 subjects (31.5%). RESULTS: The mean age of patients with HF (group 1) was 63.4 (11.4) years compared with 59.9 (11.6) years in those without HF (group 2) (P<.01). There were differences between groups 1 and 2 in history of diabetes (36% vs 20%; P<.001) or previous HF (9.2% vs 1.1%; P<.001). The reperfusion strategy used in patients with Q-wave infarction, with or without HF, was primary angioplasty in 15% and 14%, respectively (P=.81), and thrombolytic agents in 28% and 37%, respectively (P=.013). Patients with HF were more likely to develop recurrent angina (26.8% vs 19.6%; P=.02), pericarditis (17.5% vs 6.3%; P<.001), and atrial fibrillation (12.3% vs 5.1%; P<.01). In-hospital mortality in groups 1 and 2 was 15.6% and 2.3% (P<.001), respectively, and 10-year survival was 10% and 30%, respectively (P<.001). The variables associated with mortality were: age (HR=1.022; P<.001), hyperglycemia (HR=1.748 per 1.0-g/L increase; P<.001), leukocytosis (HR=1.035 per 1000-cell/.L increase; P<.001), and HF (HR=1.308; P=.028). CONCLUSIONS: AMI is still frequently complicated by HF, which increases short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. Heart failure, age, hyperglycemia, and leukocytosis at admission were independent predictors of mortality during follow-up.     

Impact of sex on long-term mortality from acute myocardial infarction vs unstable angina

BACKGROUND: Patient sex has been shown to differentially affect mortality from unstable angina (UA) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, to our knowledge, no prior population-based studies have examined both cohorts simultaneously to explain this intriguing variation. Hence, we undertook to explore and explain sex differences in 5-year mortality after UA and AMI. METHODS: We used an administrative database of 22 967 patients with AMI and 8441 patients with UA discharged from acute care hospitals in Alberta between April 1, 1993, and March 31, 2000. RESULTS: Women were older with more baseline comorbidities, more frequently had a diagnosis of UA, and had 30% lower relative odds of undergoing revascularization than men. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year mortality were similar between sexes after UA (women vs men, 21.6% vs 19.5%; P =.09) but markedly higher for women after AMI (38.5% vs 26.6%, P<.001). After adjustment for baseline characteristics and revascularization, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for women vs men were 0.81 (0.72-0.92) after UA and 0.99 (0.93-1.05) after AMI. Only women younger than 65 years were at a significantly higher risk after AMI. The reasons for this difference in sex-related outcomes between UA and AMI may relate to greater disparities in the AMI cohort with respect to age, comorbidities, neighborhood incomes, and referrals to cardiovascular specialists. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to UA, AMI has a more serious impact on women than men, such that women have a survival advantage when afflicted with UA but lose that advantage with AMI. Additional investigation into the causes, treatment, and policy implications of the age-sex interaction is warranted.     

Long-term outcome in patients with unstable angina treated by coronary balloon angioplasty

Comparison of balloon angioplasty results in 472 patients with stable angina (SA) and 158 patients with unstable angina (UA) in 5-year follow-up is reported. Clinical success rate did not differ significantly, while periprocedural complications rate was higher in UA group (22.3 vs. 11.1%, P<0.001). During follow-up UA patients demonstrated higher: restenosis rate (48.5 vs. 30.4%, P<0.001), incidence of myocardial infarction (8.8 vs. 3.0%, P=0.004), although cardiac mortality did not differ significantly (2.2 vs. 1.6%). Reintervention rate in patients with unstable angina resultant from restenosis or significant artherosclerosis progression in coronary vessels, or originating from both of them, was also higher (53.7 vs. 34.1%, P<0.001). Event-free survival was significantly lower in UA patients (43.4 vs. 61.3%, P=0.02). The uni- and multivariate analysis proved that unstable angina was an independent risk factor in restenosis, re-intervention and cardiac events rate, despite perceptible differences in the baseline characteristics. Sub-group analysis of UA patients according to Braunwald classification revealed lower success rate and higher incidence of myocardial infarction during follow-up in post-infarction angina (class C), whereas new onset, no-rest angina (class I) had higher event-free survival in comparison with rest angina (classes II and III). CONCLUSIONS: UA patients treated by balloon angioplasty had higher periprocedural complications rate, as well as restenosis and re-intervention rate. Despite higher cardiovascular events rate during 5-year follow-up in UA group, survival rate in both groups was high and cardiac mortality did not differ significantly. Unstable angina constitutes a strong independent risk factor in adverse long-term outcome.     

Effectiveness of a multifactorial strategy for implementing clinical guidelines on unstable angina: cluster randomized trial

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES. Clinical practice in unstable angina is not always based on best evidence. Guidelines have the potential to improve quality of health care. There are no randomised trials assessing implementation strategies in the public healthcare system of Spain yet. OBJECTIVE: to compare the effectiveness of a multifaceted strategy (interactive educational meetings, local consensus process) for guideline implementation in unstable angina, with a passive dissemination strategy. Patients and method. SETTING: 10 wards from 3 university hospitals in Sevilla. PARTICIPANTS: 153 specialists (cardiologists, internists) and their patients admitted for an unstable angina episode. DESIGN: a pragmatic, before and after cluster randomized controlled trial. Intervention was delivered from January to April 1998. Retrospective data collection took place in July 1999, of those pre and post-intervention episodes attended from January to October 1997 and from September 1998 to June 1999, respectively. OUTCOMES: compliance with the guideline recommendations for coronary angiography and stress testing, and ejection fraction assessment. RESULTS: The multifaceted strategy compared with the passive one, was associated with an absolute improvement in the appropriateness of use of coronary angiography and stress testing of 11% (95% CI, 0.85-21.1), P=.03. There was no association for the assessment of the ejection fraction: absolute improvement of 1.1% (95% CI, --15.9 to 18.1), P=.88. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that a combination of interactive educational meetings and local consensus process delivered to wards of physicians may improve the appropriateness of use of coronary angiography and stress testing.     

Functional status and patient satisfaction a comparison of ischemic heart disease,obstructive lung disease,and diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which chronic illness and disease severity affect patient satisfaction with their primary care provider in general internal medicine clinics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mailed questionnaire study. SETTING: Primary care clinics at 7 Veterans Affairs medical centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Of 62,487 patients participating in the Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project, 35,383 (57%) returned an initial screening questionnaire and were subsequently sent a satisfaction questionnaire. Patients (N=21,689; 61%) who returned the Seattle Outpatient Satisfaction Survey (SOSQ) were included in the final analysis, representing 34% of the original sample. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The organizational score of the SOSQ measures satisfaction with health care services in the internal medicine clinic, and the humanistic scale measures patient satisfaction with the communication skills and humanistic qualities of the primary care physician. For ischemic heart disease (IHD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and diabetes, patient ability to cope with their disease was more strongly associated with patient satisfaction than disease severity. Among IHD patients, improvement in ability to cope emotionally with their angina was associated with higher SOSQ organizational scores (standardized beta=0.18; P<.001) but self-reported physical limitation due to angina was not (beta=0.01; P=.65). Similarly, in COPD, improved ability to cope with dyspnea was associated with greater organizational scores (beta=0.11; P<.001) but physical function was not (beta=-0.03; P=.27). For diabetes, increased education was associated with improved organizational scores (beta=0.31; P<.001) but improvement in symptom burden was not (beta=0.03; P=.14). Similar results were seen with prediction of SOSQ humanistic scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patient education and ability to cope with chronic conditions are more strongly associated with satisfaction with their primary care provider than disease severity. Further improvements in patient education and self-management may lead to improved satisfaction and quality of care.     

Outcome of liver transplantation in patients with diabetes mellitus: a case-control study.

The influence of preexisting diabetes mellitus (DM) on outcome after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has not been well defined. The objective of our study was to compare the morbidity and mortality after OLT in 57 patients with preexisting DM (3 type I, 54 type II) with 114 age-, sex-, and race-matched patients without DM (case controls). The demographics were similar in both groups. Pretransplantation serum creatinine was significantly higher in the diabetic group compared with case controls. The incidence of the following complications was significantly higher in the diabetic group after OLT: cardiovascular (61.4% vs. 21.9%, P <.001), major (54.4% vs. 29.8%, P =.002) and minor infections (29.8% vs. 7.9%, P <.0001), renal (59.7% vs. 20.2%, P <.001), ophthalmologic (10.5% vs. 0.9%, P =.01), respiratory (24.6% vs. 7.0%, P =.001), neurologic (31.6% vs. 7.0%, P <.001), hematologic (19.3% vss 2.6%, P =.001), musculoskeletal (24.6% vs. 5.3%, P =.001), and malignancy (22.8% vs. 10.5%, P =.03). The duration of hospital stay, cost of hospitalization, retransplantation, and overall graft survival were similar. Acute rejection was seen in 50.9% of diabetics compared with 25.4% in controls (P =.0009). One-year (87% vs. 77%) and 2-year (81.6% vs. 70.1%) patient survival was similar, but 5-year survival was lower in the DM group (34.4% vs. 67.7%, P =.002). In conclusion, preexisting diabetes is associated with a significant post-OLT morbidity and mortality, and our observations suggest that patients with DM warrant more rigorous pre- and post-OLT evaluation.     

Immediate and one-year outcome of intracoronary stent implantation in small coronary arteries with 2.5-mm stents

BACKGROUND: The role of coronary stenting in the treatment of stenoses in small coronary arteries with use of 2.5-mm stents is not well defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 1995 and August 1999, 651 patients with stenoses in small coronary arteries were treated with 2.5-mm stents (n = 108) or 2.5-mm conventional balloon angioplasty (BA) (n = 543). Patients who received treatment with both 2.5-mm and > or =3.0-mm stent placement or balloons were excluded. Procedural success and complication rates as well as 1-year follow-up outcomes were examined. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups, except patients in the stent group were more likely to have hypertension and a family history of coronary artery disease and less likely to have prior myocardial infarction. Angiographic success rates were higher in the stent group (97.2% vs 90.2%, P =.02). In-hospital complication rates were comparable between the two groups. Among successfully treated patients, 1-year follow-up revealed no significant differences in the survival (96.2% vs 95.2%, P =.89) or the frequency of Q-wave myocardial infarction (0% vs 0.4%, P =.60) or coronary artery bypass grafting (8.4% vs 6.8%, P =.89) between the stent and BA groups, respectively. However, patients in the stent group were more likely to have adverse cardiac events (35.4% vs 22.1%, P =.05). Stent use after excluding GR II stent use, however, was not independently associated with reduced cardiac events at follow-up (relative risk 1. 3 [95% confidence interval 0.8-2.3], P =.30). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary stent implantation of stenoses in small coronary arteries with 2.5-mm stents can be carried out with high success and acceptable complication rates. However, compared with BA alone, stent use was not associated with improved outcome through 1 year of follow-up.     

Impact of gastroenterology consultation on the outcomes of patients admitted to the hospital with decompensated cirrhosis.

Managed care has strongly discouraged generalists from referring patients to specialists in an effort to reduce the costs of health care. The aim of this study was to compare patient outcomes when generalists work together with gastroenterologists or alone in the management of patients admitted to the hospital with decompensated cirrhosis. Consecutive patients admitted to the hospital with decompensated cirrhosis over a 1-year period were identified. We compared the length of stay, cost of hospitalization, incidence of hospital readmission, and mortality for patients who did and those who did not have a gastroenterology (GI) consultation. A GI consultation was requested for 107 of the 197 patients (54.3%). Patients who had a GI consultation had a significantly shorter length of stay (5.6 +/- 3.5 vs. 10.1 +/- 5.8 days, P <.001) and a lower cost of hospitalization ($6,004 +/- $4,994 vs. $10,006 +/- $6,183, P <.001) than those patients who were managed by generalists alone. The 30-day incidence of readmission (13.3% vs. 27.8%, P =.01) and mortality (7.5% vs. 16.7%, P =.045) were significantly lower in the GI consultation group. During a median follow-up of 618 days (range, 2-970), patients who had a GI consultation during hospitalization had a significantly longer time to hospital readmission (P <.001) and improved survival (P =.02) compared with those who were managed by generalists alone. In conclusion, for patients admitted to the hospital with decompensated cirrhosis, individuals who were managed by generalists in conjunction with gastroenterologists had better outcomes than those who were managed by generalists alone.     

Quality improvement initiative and its impact on the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: Wide variation exists in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) management, leading to differences in outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the quality improvement initiative on appropriate management of AMI. DESIGN: Prospective patient identification, retrospective medical record review. PATIENTS: All patients with AMI discharged alive (N = 497) from our institution between April 1, 1995, and February 28, 1997. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The effect of quality improvements directed at the patient, nurse, and physician on the adherence to key quality indicators. RESULTS: The quality improvement initiative correlated with more frequent use of reperfusion therapy (98%), and with aspirin use in the emergency department (95%), in ideal eligible patients. Similarly, adherence to discharge quality indicators, including use of aspirin (97%), beta-blockers (94%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (90%), and lipid-lowering agents (67%); avoidance of calcium channel blockers (93%); a low-fat diet (96%); smoking cessation counseling (94%); and outpatient rehabilitation referral (70%) was higher, including in the very old (those aged >/=80 years) and in women. The use of a patient education tool was associated with a higher adherence to most quality indicators compared with patients in whom this was not used: discharge aspirin (99% vs 96%; P =.02), beta-blocker (98% vs 91%; P =.002), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (95% vs 86%; P =.01), and lipid-lowering agent (71% vs 62%; P =.04) use; outpatient rehabilitation (82% vs 63%; P=.001); and documentation of smoking cessation counseling (98% vs 87%; P =. 001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a quality improvement program was associated with a high adherence to quality-of-care indicators for AMI. Patient-directed feedback before discharge improved adherence to key indicators for AMI beyond that achieved with tools only directed at caregivers.     

Pathology of unstable angina: Analysis of biopsies obtained by directional coronary atherectomy

Background: The transient and generally nonfatal nature of unstable angina has impaired the accumulation of pathologic data and the definition of the pathoanatomy of this syndrome.Methods: Atherectomy specimens from patients enrolled in CAVEAT were examined for the presence of thrombus, foam cells, cholesterol clefts, media, and adventitia. Comparison of the pathologic findings was made according to clinical presentation in the following categories: stable angina, unstable angina, and recent myocardial infarction.Results: Patients with unstable angina had a slightly higher incidence of thrombus when compared with patients presenting with stable angina (36% vs. 26%, p = .14). Within the unstable angina population some subgroups demonstrated a greater incidence of thrombus, including those whose pain was associated with ECG changes (43%, p =.06) or occurred after myocardial infarction (42%, p = .07). The incidence of thrombus was highest among patients who had a myocardial infarction within 30 days (53%, p =.004) or within 14 days (58%, p=.003). No difference between the patient groups was detected with respect to the other histologie findings.Conclusions: Atherectomy specimens from patients with unstable angina demonstrated a trend toward increasing incidence of thrombus, but this trend did not achieve statistical significance. Specimens from patients with a recent myocardial infarction did not demonstrate a significant increase in the presence of thrombus. While thrombus is a component of the pathophysiology of unstable angina in a significant number of patients, continued study is required to determine the other factors that are responsible.     

不稳定心绞痛和非Q波心肌梗死抗凝治疗中血小板减低的临床意义

目的　本文旨在探讨肝素在治疗不伴有 ST段抬高的不稳定性心绞痛 (U AP)和非 Q波心肌梗死 (NQMI)患者中血小板减低的临床意义。方法　冠心病监护病房收治的 84 0例不伴有 ST段抬高的 U AP及 NQMI患者 ,给予肝素抗凝治疗 ,治疗后的 2 4小时测定患者的血小板计数 ,根据血小板测定结果 ,分成血小板减低组 (<10 0× 10 9/ L,n=2 4 )及非血小板减低组 (>10 0× 10 9/ L,n=816 )。结果　血小板减少的发生率为 2 .85 % ,血小板减少组住院病死率、顽固性心绞痛及出血合并症显著高于非血小板减低组 (分别为 18.31%比 5 .14 % ,P<0 .0 5 ;2 5 .0 0 %比 11.4 2 % ,P<0 .0 5和 33.33比 11.6 4 % ,<0 .0 1) ;急性心肌梗死发生率有高于非血小板减低组的趋势 (16 .6 7%比 11.0 3% ,但 P >0 .0 5 )。结论　在肝素治疗不伴有 ST段抬高的 U AP及 NQMI中 ,发生血小板减低者临床预后不良