The effect of different doses of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection on corneal neovascularization

To evaluate the effects of various doses of subconjunctival bevacizumab injections in the treatment of patients with corneal neovascularization. During the 6-month-follow-up, no significant ocular or systemic adverse events were observed related to the subconjunctival bevacizumab injection. In Group 1, the total area of corneal neovascularization before injection was 14.8 ± 3.2 % of the corneal surface and 10.2 ± 2.8 % 6 months after injection (p < 0.01). The mean decrease in Group 1 was 32.0 ± 3.0 %. In Group 2, the total area of corneal neovascularization before and 6 months after the injection was 14.2 ± 2.5 and 9.8 ± 2.3 %, respectively (p < 0.01). The mean decrease in Group 2 was 31.0 ± 2.3 %. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Twenty-four eyes of 24 patients with corneal neovascularization who were treated with a subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab were included in this retrospective study. Fourteen eyes were treated with 2.5 mg/0.1 ml (Group 1), and 10 eyes were treated with 5.0 mg/0.2 ml (Group 2) of subconjunctival bevacizumab. Digital photographs of the cornea were used to determine the area of corneal neovascularization before injection and at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment. Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab is well tolerated and associated with a partial regression of corneal neovascularization. The efficacy of this treatment is not correlated to the injection dose.     

The Effect of Bevacizumab on Corneal Neovascularization in Rabbits

Purpose

To determine the efficacy of topical application and subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab in the treatment of corneal neovascularization.

Methods

Corneal neovascularization was induced with a silk suture of the corneal stroma in 12 rabbits (24 eyes). One week after suturing, four rabbits were treated with topical bevacizumab at 5 mg/mL (group A) and another four rabbits were treated with topical bevacizumab 10 mg/mL (group B) in the right eyes twice a day for two weeks. A subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab 1.25 mg/mL was done in the right eyes of four rabbits (group C). All of the left eyes (12 eyes) were used as controls. The area of corneal neovascularization was measured after one and two weeks, and the concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in corneal tissue was measured after two weeks.

Results

The neovascularized area was smaller in all treated groups than in the control group (p<0.001). Upon analysis of the neovascularized area, there was no significant difference between groups A and B. However, the mean neovascularized area of group B was significantly smaller than that of group C after two weeks of treatment (p=0.043). The histologic examination revealed fewer new corneal vessels in all treated groups than the control group. The concentration of VEGF was significantly lower in all treated groups compared to the control group (p<0.01), but no difference was shown between treated groups.

Conclusions

Topical and subconjunctival bevacizumab application may be useful in the treatment of corneal neovascularization and further study is necessary.     

The Effect of Bevacizumab versus Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Corneal Neovascularization: A Preliminary Study

Purpose

To compare the short term effects of bevacizumab and ranibizumab injections on the regression of corneal neovascularization (NV).

Methods

Sixteen eyes of 16 patients with corneal NV were randomly assigned for an injection with 2.5 mg of bevacizumab (group 1, n = 8) or 1 mg of ranibizumab (group 2, n = 8) through subconjunctival and intrastromal routes. The patients were prospectively followed-up for one month after the injections. Corneal NV areas, as shown on corneal slit-lamp photographs stored in JPEG format, were calculated using Image J software before the injection, one week after the injection, and one month after the injection. The corneal NV areas were compared before and after the injections.

Results

Seven women and nine men, with an average age of 51 years, presented with corneal NV secondary to herpetic keratitis (7 cases), graft rejection (6), chemical burn (1), pemphigoid (1), and recurrent ulcer (1). In group I, the preoperative corneal NV area (8.75 ± 4.33%) was significantly decreased to 5.62 ± 3.86% one week after the injection and to 6.35 ± 3.02% one month after the injection (p = 0.012, 0.012, respectively). The corneal NV area in group 2 also exhibited a significant change, from 7.37 ± 4.33% to 6.72 ± 4.16% one week after the injection (p = 0.012). However, no significant change was observed one month after the injection. The mean decrease in corneal NV area one month after injection in group 1 (28.4 ± 9.01%) was significantly higher than in group 2 (4.51 ± 11.64%, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Bevacizumab injection resulted in a more effective and stable regression of corneal NV compared to the ranibizumab injection. The potency and dose of these two drugs for the regression of corneal NV require further investigation.     

Subconjunctival bevacizumab in the impending recurrent pterygia

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection(s) in the treatment of impending recurrent pterygia. Twenty-three eyes of 23 patients who developed impending recurrence after pterygium surgery with conjunctival autografting and were treated with subconjunctival bevacizumab injection(s) (2.5 mg/0.1 mL) were included in the study. Anterior segment photographs were taken prior to and at 1 week, 1, 3 and 6 months after the injection, and at the end of the follow-up period. Image analysis was performed using an image processing and analysis software program. Recurrence rate and complications were recorded. The mean age and follow-up time of the patients were 51.2 ± 6.2 (31–60 years) and 16.8 ± 3.1 (12–22 months), respectively. The average number of injections was 2 ± 0.78 (1–3). Sixteen eyes required re-injection (two injections in nine eyes, three injections in seven eyes), due to progression of vascularization. There were significant differences between size percentage of lesions before injection and at 1 week, 1, 3 and 6 months after the injection (p < 0.05 for all). Corneal recurrence developed in only one patient and no ocular or systemic side-effects of bevacizumab were observed. Repeated injections of bevacizumab may help to prevent the high recurrence rate of residual impending pterygium, due to its adjuvant role in decreasing lesion size, especially in the first year after surgery.     

Ranibizumab Injection for Corneal Neovascularization Refractory to Bevacizumab Treatment

Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor is an emerging therapeutic modality for various ocular diseases with neovascularization (NV). However, for corneal NV, controversy remains regarding whether bevacizumab or ranibizumab is superior. A 32-year-old female diagnosed with herpetic keratoconjunctivitis with refractory corneal NV despite two previous subconjunctival and intrastromal bevacizumab injections, received two subconjunctival and intrastromal ranibizumab injections. Six months postoperatively, there was significant regression of the neovascular area and vessel caliber. Here, the authors report a case of improvement in corneal NV with subconjunctival and intrastromal ranibizumab injections, which was previously refractory to bevacizumab injection. The findings may suggest a new prospect in treating corneal NV.     

Inhibition of experimental corneal neovascularization by using subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab (Avastin)

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab (Avastin) administration on corneal neovascularization (NV) in rabbits. METHODS: NV was induced by placing a suture at the corneal periphery of the right eye of 20 rabbits. Immediately after suturing and again 1 week later, rabbits were divided into 2 groups and administered a subconjunctival injection of normal saline (control) or bevacizumab (Avastin; 5 mg/0.2 mL), respectively. On day 14, digital photographs of the cornea were taken and analyzed to determine the area of the cornea covered by NV. In addition, immunohistochemical analysis was used to determine CD31 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in corneal tissue. RESULTS: Analysis of digital photographs showed that there was less corneal NV in bevacizumab-treated eyes than in controls (P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). In addition, there was less staining for VEGF and CD31 in corneas from bevacizumab-treated eyes than in control eyes. Subconjunctival bevacizumab injections were not associated with any complications during observation. CONCLUSIONS: Subconjunctival bevacizumab administration decreased suture-induced corneal neovascularization in rabbits.     

Therapeutic effect of subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab in the treatment of corneal neovascularization

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with corneal neovascularization. Methods: Twenty‐nine eyes of 29 patients with corneal neovascularization were treated with subconjunctival injection [1.25 mg/0.05 ml (seven eyes), 2.5 mg/0.1 ml (15 eyes) and 5.0 mg/0.2 ml (seven eyes)] of bevacizumab. Best‐corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure and area of corneal neovascularization were measured before injection and at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after treatment. Results: At 1 week, the mean neovascularized corneal area decreased significantly to 85.5 ± 18.0% (p = 0.01) in the eyes treated with 2.5 mg bevacizumab and to 73.1 ± 23.4% (p = 0.02) in the eyes treated with 5.0 mg bevacizumab. At 3 months, the mean neovascularized corneal area was 93.6 ± 10.6% (p = 0.10 compared to baseline; p < 0.01 compared to 1 week) in the eyes treated with 2.5 mg bevacizumab and 83.3 ± 25.8% (p = 0.03 compared to baseline; p = 0.02 compared to 1 week) in the eyes treated with 5.0 mg bevacizumab. However, there were no significant changes in the areas of the eyes injected with 1.25 mg bevacizumab. Conclusion: Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab can partially reduce corneal neovascularization in the short term, and the efficacy of this treatment correlates with the injection dose.     

Combined scraping,coagulation, and subconjunctival bevacizumab in corneal transplantation for bullous keratopathy with corneal neovascularization

PurposeThis study investigated clinical outcomes of the combined method of scraping, coagulation, and subconjunctival bevacizumab for the treatment of corneal neovascularization (NV) in penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).MethodsThis study included patients undergoing PKP who were diagnosed with bullous keratopathy with dense subepithelial scarring that was not suitable for Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Corneal NV was treated by scraping the corneal epithelium and lightly coagulating the superficial corneal stromal NV combined with subconjunctival bevacizumab injection at the end of surgery. Patients without corneal NV were used as the control group.ResultsThere were six patients with vascularized corneas in the study group and three patients without vascularized corneas in the control group. The original corneal NV in the study group disappeared in all patients after surgery. Three of the six (50%) study patients experienced recurrent corneal NV. One of the three (33%) control patients developed corneal NV. These patients had no corneal NV recurrences over the next 6 months after repeat treatment. In both groups, no graft failure or chronic epithelial defects occurred.ConclusionThe combination of scraping the corneal epithelium, coagulating the superficial corneal stromal NV and the feeding vessels in the sclera after peritomy, and subconjunctival bevacizumab injection is an effective method to treat corneal NV in corneal transplantation for bullous keratopathy.     

Effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab (Avastin) on experimental corneal neovascularization in guinea pigs

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab (Avastin) on experimental corneal neovascularization in guinea pigs. METHODS: Forty eyes of 40 guinea pigs were chemically cauterized with 75% silver nitrate and 25% potassium nitrate sticks. Fifteen eyes (group 1) received 2 subconjunctival injections of bevacizumab (0.1 mL, 1.25 mg) simultaneously with cauterization and 3 days later. Fifteen eyes (group 2) received 2 subconjunctival injections of bevacizumab (0.1 mL, 1.25 mg) 3 and 5 days after cauterization. Ten eyes (group 3, control group) received 2 subconjunctival injections of 0.1 mL of balanced salt solution 3 and 5 days after cauterization. After we determined the burn and neovascularization scores for all groups, the animals were killed on the 10th day. The percentages of neovascularization on the surface of the cornea were measured in terms of pixels on digital photographs. The average number of vessels at maximally vascularized areas was determined for each specimen. RESULTS: Neovascularization score was 1.1 +/- 0.3 in group 1, 2.46 +/- 1.3 in group 2, and 3.5 +/- 0.5 in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The area of neovascularization at the cornea surface was 15.6% +/- 10.1% in group 1, 19.74% +/- 11.2% in group 2, and 23.5% +/- 7.4% in the control group (P = 0.194). The average number of neovascular vessels at group 1 was significantly reduced in comparison with group 2 and the control group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab decreases the extent of chemically induced corneal neovascularization in guinea pigs. The antineovascular effect of bevacizumab is higher if the injection is performed simultaneously with the chemical cauterization.     

结膜下注射贝伐单抗对兔角膜新生血管的抑制作用

目的 观察碱烧伤后不同时间结膜下注射贝伐单抗（Bevacizumab）角膜新生血管（CNV）的形成与转归.方法 新西兰白兔54只,制成单眼碱烧伤模型,随机分为3组,每组18只眼,A组碱烧伤后结膜下立即注射贝伐单抗2.5 mg（0.1 ml）,B组碱烧伤后3d结膜下注射贝伐单抗2.5 mg（0.1 ml）,C组结膜下注射生理盐水0.1ml,为对照组.共观察28 d.裂隙灯显微镜下观察角膜新生血管生长情况,行眼前段照相并计算其面积,伤后7、14、28 d各组随机取6例角膜行共焦显微镜检查,观察角膜组织炎性细胞浸润情况及角膜新生血管形态学变化.结果 A、B及C组角膜新生血管开始出现的时间分别为（5.9＋0.8）d、（3.5＋0.6）d及（3.4＋1.1）d,其中A组明显较C组延长（P＜0.05）,B组与C组差异无统计学意义（P =0.068）.伤后各时间点A、B组角膜新生血管的生长面积均明显较C组减少（P＜0.05）,A组与B组角膜新生血管面积比较,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.共焦显微镜检查可见C组烧伤区大量炎性细胞浸润及新生血管形成,而A组角膜炎性细胞较少,烧伤区无新生血管形成,B组见少量新生血管侵入烧伤区.3组基质层均可见纤维及瘢痕组织增生,其中治疗组纤维增生程度与瘢痕组织均较对照组轻.结论 结膜下注射贝伐单抗可抑制角膜炎性细胞形成,改善损伤角膜基质,促进角膜愈合,从而减少碱烧伤引起的角膜新生血管的生长,在早期注射能取得更好的疗效.     

Subconjunctival bevacizumab as an adjuvant in first-time filtration surgery for patients with primary glaucomas

To investigate subconjunctival bevacizumab as an adjuvant in first-time glaucoma filtration surgery, we conducted a non-comparative, interventional case series, enrolling consecutive patients with uncontrolled primary glaucomas. All patients underwent trabeculectomy with mitomycin C and received a 1.25 mg subconjunctival bevacizumab injection at completion of the surgery. Main outcome measurements were success rates, bleb morphology [standardized classification based on vascularity (0–1), extension (0–1) and height (0–1); ranging from 0 to 3 (0 = poor; 1 = regular; 2 = good; 3 = excellent)] and post-operative complications. Twenty-five eyes from 25 patients (mean age 64.3 ± 12.8 years) were included. After a mean follow-up of 16.7 ± 6.1 months, mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was significantly reduced from 22.7 ± 10.8 to 12.9 ± 4.3 mmHg at the last follow-up (p < 0.01). Complete success rates at 12 months ranged between 71 and 88 %, while qualified success rates ranged between 84 and 96 %, depending on the criterion adopted (the strictest success criterion was defined as IOP between 6 and 12 mmHg). Blebs were graded as good or excellent in 80 % of the cases. No serious post-operative complication or avascular blebs were observed. These mid-term results suggest subconjunctival bevacizumab as a safe and effective adjuvant in first-time filtration surgery for primary glaucoma patients.     

Subconjunctival bevacizumab for corneal neovascularization

Objective To report the efficacy of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection in patients with corneal neovascularization (NV). Methods This retrospective interventional case study included two eyes of two patients with corneal NV due to aqueous-deficient dry eye with filamentary keratitis in the first case, and corneal graft failure in the second case. Patients received a subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg (0.1 ml) bevacizumab. Morphologic changes were investigated by slit-lamp biomicroscopy and corneal photography. Results Corneal NV was dramatically regressed a week after injection in the first case. In the second case, minor vessels were regressed while the major one did not. No infection or inflammation was observed. No relapse was seen within the follow-up of two to three months. Conclusion Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab may offer an additional strategy for the treatment of corneal NV.     

Concentration of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor After Intracameral Bevacizumab Injection in Eyes With Neovascular Glaucoma

Purpose

To study the concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the aqueous humor before and after intracameral injection of bevacizumab in eyes with neovascular glaucoma, and to detect the duration of an anti-VEGF effect of bevacizumab in the anterior chamber.

Methods

In this prospective interventional case series, 1.25 mg of bevacizumab was injected into the anterior chamber of five eyes in five neovascular glaucoma patients. Aqueous humor samples were obtained just before intracameral injection of bevacizumab and two weeks after injection. The concentrations of VEGF in the aqueous humor were measured using ELISA. To investigate corneal endothelial damage after intrecameral bevacizumab injection, specular microscopy was performed before injection and two weeks after injection. Slit lamp photo and iris fluorescent angiography was performed to determine the regression of iris neovascularization.

Results

After injection, substantial regression of neovascularization or fluorescein leakage was seen in all treated eyes. The VEGF concentrations in the aqueous humor in eyes with NVG were 1181.8±1248.3 pg/mL before intracameral injection of bevacizumab. Two weeks after injection, the VEGF concentrations decreased to 33.2±12.2 pg/mL (p=0.04, Wilcoxon signed rank test). There were no significant changes in IOP or corneal endothelial cells.

Conclusions

Intracameral bevacizumab injection can remarkably reduce iris neovascularization in neovascular glaucoma patients. VEGF levels were significantly decreased two weeks after injection and corneal toxicity was not observed during short term follow-up.     

Inhibitory effects of bevacizumab on angiogenesis and corneal neovascularization

Background

To evaluate the inhibitory effects of bevacizumab (Avastin®) on angiogenesis using cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in vitro and on corneal neovascularization by subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab in vivo.

Methods

After the HUVECs were exposed to different concentrations of bevacizumab stimulated with VEGF (10 ng/ml) for 2, 6, and 24 hours, cellular-activity-like proliferation, migration and tube formation were assessed. Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 ml) was performed after corneal chemical burn injury. Then the cornea was evaluated by biomicroscopy, fluorescein angiography, and light microscopy.

Results

The inhibitory effects of bevacizumab on VEGF-induced HUVECs proliferation showed a dose-dependent response for 2 and 6 hours, but all groups were effectively inhibited regardless of the concentration of bevacizumab for 24 hours. The inhibitory effects of bevacizumab on the migration of VEGF-induced HUVECs showed a time- and dose-dependent response. The inhibitory effects of bevacizumab on VEGF-induced HUVECs tube formation showed a dose-dependent response only for 24 hours. On days 3 and 8 after the subconjunctival injection, bevacizumab-treated eyes showed less neovascular growth than BSS-treated eyes in biomicroscopic, fluorescein angiographic, and light microscopic findings in vivo.

Conclusions

Bevacizumab effectively inhibits angiogenesis and corneal neovascularization, and could be used as a inhibitor of corneal neovascularization in the future.

     

Bleb vascularity following post‐trabeculectomy subconjunctival bevacizumab: a pilot study

Background: To determine whether postoperative subconjunctival bevacizumab significantly alters bleb vascularity. Design: A randomized, prospective interventional study. Participants: Forty‐three eyes from 39 patients were recruited, with 21 eyes randomized to subconjunctival injections of 5‐fluorouracil, and 22 eyes to combined 5‐fluorouracil/bevacizumab. Methods: All patients who underwent uncomplicated primary antimetabolite augmented trabeculectomy who subsequently required postoperative subconjunctival 5‐fluorouracil injection within 4 weeks of surgery were eligible. Patients were randomized to receive subconjunctival 5‐fluorouracil only (7.5 mg/0.15 mL) or 5‐fluorouracil plus bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL). Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was bleb vascularity with secondary endpoints including visual acuity, intraocular pressure, bleb morphology, complications and total numbers of 5‐fluorouracil injections were recorded at baseline, week 12 and 18 months. Results: At week 12, there was no significant difference between groups for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, bleb vascularity and morphology, or total number of 5‐fluorouracil injections. By 18 months, 47.4% of the 5‐fluorouracil/bevacizumab group exhibited central bleb avascularity compared with 21.1% of the 5‐fluorouracil group (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.17). Two bleb complications (one blebitis; one suture abscess) recorded in the 5‐fluorouracil/bevacizumab group. Conclusions: After a single combined injection, a trend for increased central bleb avascularity was observed, although this effect was not sufficient to reach statistical significance. This, in addition to the occurrence of two bleb‐related complications in the bevacizumab group, suggests the need for a larger clinical trial to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab as a modulating agent in glaucoma filtration surgery.     

Subconjunctival bevacizumab injection for corneal neovascularization

PURPOSE: To report on the clinical use of subconjunctival bevacizumab in patients with corneal neovascularization. METHODS: The charts of 10 consecutive patients with corneal neovascularization who received subconjunctival injections of bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 mL) were reviewed. Digital photographs of the cornea were graded by 2 masked observers for density, extent, and centricity of corneal vascularization. Image analysis was used to determine the area of cornea covered by neovascularization as a percentage of the total corneal area. RESULTS: No significant ocular or systemic adverse events were observed during 3.5 +/- 1.1 months of follow-up. Seven patients showed partial regression of vessels. The extent decreased from 6.0 +/- 1.2 (SD) clock hours before the injection to 4.6 +/- 1.0 clock hours after bevacizumab injection (P = 0.008). Density decreased from 2.7 +/- 0.2 to 1.9 +/- 0.3, respectively. (P = 0.007). No change was noticed in the centricity of corneal vessels. Corneal neovascularization covered, on average, 14.8% +/- 2.5% (SD) of the corneal surface before the injections, compared with 10.5% +/- 2.8% (P = 0.36, t test) after bevacizumab injection. Therefore, bevacizumab decreased corneal neovascularization by 29%. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term results suggest that subconjunctival bevacizumab is well tolerated and associated with a partial regression of corneal neovascularization.     

Safety of bevacizumab on extraocular muscle in a rabbit model

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the myotoxicity of bevacizumab on extraocular muscles in a rabbit model.

Methods

Thirty New Zealand white rabbits were used for this study. The animals were evenly divided into two groups. In the first group, 15 rabbits were treated with intramuscular injections of bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) in the right superior rectus muscle and normal saline solution (0.05 mL) in the left superior rectus muscle. In the second group, 15 rabbits were treated with subconjunctival injections of bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 mL) in the right superior subconjunctival area and normal saline solution (0.1 mL) in the left superior subconjunctival area. Five rabbits in each group were sacrificed at one day, two weeks and four weeks after the injections. Extraocular muscle samples were prepared for light microscopic (LM) and electron microscopic (EM) examination. Degrees of acute inflammation were evaluated via CD-11b immunohistochemistry, and global muscle change was investigated using hematoxylin and eosin stains. Intensity of fibrosis was evaluated using Masson trichrome stains, and ultrastructural changes were observed on EM.

Results

We observed no significant inflammatory cell infiltration, muscle necrosis or fibrotic change in treated and control eyes. EM findings revealed no significant damage to muscle or vascular tissue after bevacizumab injection.

Conclusions

We found no signs of extraocular muscle toxicity after LM and EM intramuscular and subconjunctival bevacizumab injections in a rabbit model.     

Comparison of subconjunctivally injected bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib for inhibition of corneal neovascularization in a rat model

AIM:To compare the efficacies of subconjunctival bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib sodium injections for the inhibition of corneal neovascularization in an experimental rat model. METHODS:Sixteen corneas of 16 rats were chemically cauterized and randomized into four groups:bevacizumab group that treated with 0.05mL/1.25mg bevacizumab, ranibizumab group that treated with 0.05mL/0.5mg ranibizumab, pegaptanib group that treated with 0.05mL/0.15mg pegaptanib sodium, and control group that treated with 0.05mL saline solution. Digital photographs of the corneas were taken and analyzed using an image analysis software program. All corneas were excised and examined histologically on the 15^th day. RESULTS: Each treatment group had significantly less neovascularized corneal areas and fewer blood vessels than the control group (all P<0.05). In addition, bevacizumab group had significantly less neovascularized corneal areas and fewer blood vessels than ranibizumab and pegaptanib groups (both P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the ranibizumab and pegaptanib groups regarding percentage of neovascularized corneal areas and number of blood vessels (both P>0.05). CONCLUSION:Subconjunctival bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib sodium were effective with no corneal epitheliopathy for inhibiting corneal neovascularization after corneal burn in rats. Bevacizumab was more effective than ranibizumab and pegaptanib sodium.     

Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab: changes in intraocular pressure related to ocular axial length

Purpose

To evaluate the immediate and short-term effects of intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg/0.05 ml of bevacizumab on intraocular pressure related to different ocular axial lengths.

Design

A prospective case series of consecutive patients referred to the Department of Ophthalmology, San Pietro-Fatebenefratelli Hospital, from September 2011 through January 2011.

Methods

Twenty-five patients (10 men and 15 women, mean age 70.2 ± 8.98 years) scheduled for intravitreal injection of bevacizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration were enrolled in this study. Axial length was measured preoperatively using IOLMaster. Intraocular pressure was measured before injection, after 1 min and after 15 min using Tono-Pen XL tonometry.

Results

The mean intraocular pressure change following the intravitreal bevacizumab injection was 21.92 ± 6.95 mmHg after 1 min and 6.24 ± 3.77 mmHg after 15 min. The mean axial length of the examined eyes was 23.2 ± 1.06 mm. A good correlation was observed between the axial length and intraocular pressure rise after both 1 (R ² = 0.752, p < 0.001) and 15 min (R ² = 0.559, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml of bevacizumab can be exposed to intraocular pressure increases correlated to ocular axial length.     

Comparison of the inhibitory effect of different doses of subconjunctival bevacizumab application in an experimental model of corneal neovascularization

AIM: To evaluate the inhibitory effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab as single- and multiple-dose application, and compare their effects on corneal neovascularization in a rat model. METHODS: Thirty adult Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this experimental study. The central cornea of the rats was cauterized chemically. The rats were randomly enrolled into three groups. All groups received subconjunctival injections. In Group 1 (control group, n=10), 0.05 mL 0.9% NaCl solution was injected on the first day. In Group 2 (single-dose group, n=10), 0.05 mL bevacizumab (1.25 mg) was injected on the first day. In Group 3 (multiple-dose group, n=10), four doses of 0.05 mL bevacizumab (1.25 mg) were injected on the first, third, fifth and seventh day. Slit-lamp examination of all rats was performed at the third and ninth day. Digital images of the corneas were taken and analyzed using image analysis software to calculate corneal neovascularization area. All rats were sacrificed on the tenth day. In corneal sections, the number of blood vessels, state of inflammation and collagen formation was evaluated histopathologically. RESULTS: In Group 3, corneal edema grades were significantly lower than Group 1 and Group 2 (P=0.02, and P=0.035, respectively). The mean percentage of neovascularized corneal area in Group 3 was significantly lower than Group 2 (P=0.005). On histopathological examination, Group 2 and Group 3 showed significantly less number of blood vessels than Group 1 (P=0.005, and P=0.001, respectively). Additionally, Group 3 showed significantly less number of blood vessels compared to Group 2 (P=0.019). Inflammation and edema grades were significantly lower in Group 3 compared to Group 1 (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Subconjunctival bevacizumab injection is effective in inhibition of newly formed corneal neovascularization. The multiple-dose bevacizumab treatment seems to be more effective compared to single-dose treatment.