Effect of a local ibotenic acid lesion in the visual association area on the prelunate gyrus (area V4) on saccadic reaction times in trained rhesus monkeys

Summary Two rhesus monkeys were trained to make saccadic eye movements from a central fixation point towards a peripheral target. Saccadic reaction times (SRTs) were measured in the gap paradigm (200 ms pause between offset of fixation point and onset of peripheral target). Target position for extensive training (SRTs of 150 to 250 saccades were collected per day) was four degrees eccentric in the lower quadrant of the visual field contralateral to the intended lesion site in area V4. For control the monkeys were also trained for target positions either in the lower quadrant ipsilateral to the intended lesion site or in the upper visual half field. After several weeks of training a bimodal distribution of saccadic reaction times, one peak at 85 ms (express saccades) and the other around 160 ms (regular saccades) was obtained for each target position. Local injection of ibotenic acid into the 4 deg representation of area V4 resulted in a unimodal distribution of saccadic reaction times (over 90% express saccades) towards the corresponding target position, leaving the distribution of reaction times for the control position unchanged. Recovery began after 5 days and was complete 8 to 10 days after the injection. From these results we conclude that V4 is involved in the generation of the longer latency peak in the distribution of saccadic reaction times by delaying the initiation of visually guided saccades.     

Occurrence of human express saccades depends on stimulus uncertainty and stimulus sequence

Summary Saccadic latencies measured in response to a step-wise displacement of the target may be substantially reduced if a gap separates the offset of the initial fixation point and the onset of the peripheral target. According to Fischer and Ramsperger (1984) this paradigm provokes a bimodal latency distribution which consists of a peak of very fast saccadic responses (express saccades) at about 110 ms and another peak arising from somewhat slower saccades (regular saccades). Using again the gap paradigm, we investigated the effect of an additional go/no-go (i.e. target trial/catch trial) decision on saccadic latencies. The experiments yielded the following results: (i) the distribution between the peaks of express and regular saccades strongly depends on the proportion of catch trials introduced into the trial sequence, which suggests the existence of different modes of operation of the decision processes for express and regular saccades. (ii) The catch trial effect on saccadic latency proved to be a local phenomenon in time: saccades which follow catch trials tend to be slower than those following target trials.     

Gap effects on saccade and vergence latency

To explore visual space, we make saccades, vergence, and, most frequently, combined saccade–vergence eye movements. The initiation of saccades is well studied, while that of vergence is less explored. Saccade latency is influenced by the fixation task: when the target appears simultaneously with the offset of the fixation point, latencies tend to be regular, whereas the introduction of a gap period before target onset causes the emergence of express latencies (80- to 120-ms). This study examines in ten normal adults whether the gap paradigm has a similar effect on the latency of vergence and combined eye movements. The second goal is to identify contextual factors that favor the emergence of short latencies, by comparing a condition in which gap and simultaneous trials were performed in separate blocks (pure blocks) with a condition in which the two types of trials were interleaved randomly (mixed blocks). The results are: (1) the gap paradigm reduced similarly (by approximately –30 ms) the mean latency of saccades, convergence, divergence, and both the saccadic and vergence components of combined eye movements; (2) the gap paradigm was responsible for the emergence of 80– to 120-ms latencies for saccades and divergence (pure or combined), but rarely for convergence; (3) inspection of the latency distributions showed that such short latencies formed a clearly distinct population, different from anticipatory responses or regular latencies, for saccades (pure or combined) but not for pure vergence; importantly, distinct express latencies were found also for the convergence and divergence components of combined eye movements; (4) no difference was found for the group of subjects between pure and mixed blocks, but the latter yielded shorter latencies for some subjects, suggesting an idiosyncratic phenomenon. We suggest that distinct express latencies are specific to saccades and could correspond to a specific mode of saccade initiation. Interestingly, the express mode of triggering can be transferred to the vergence component in the ecological condition in which saccade is combined with vergence.     

Reversible inactivation of macaque frontal eye field

 The macaque frontal eye field (FEF) is involved in the generation of saccadic eye movements and fixations. To better understand the role of the FEF, we reversibly inactivated a portion of it while a monkey made saccades and fixations in response to visual stimuli. Lidocaine was infused into a FEF and neural inactivation was monitored with a nearby microelectrode. We used two saccadic tasks. In the delay task, a target was presented and then extinguished, but the monkey was not allowed to make a saccade to its location until a cue to move was given. In the step task, the monkey was allowed to look at a target as soon as it appeared. During FEF inactivation, monkeys were severely impaired at making saccades to locations of extinguished contralateral targets in the delay task. They were similarly impaired at making saccades to locations of contralateral targets in the step task if the target was flashed for ≤100 ms, such that it was gone before the saccade was initiated. Deficits included increases in saccadic latency, increases in saccadic error, and increases in the frequency of trials in which a saccade was not made. We varied the initial fixation location and found that the impairment specifically affected contraversive saccades rather than affecting all saccades made into head-centered contralateral space. Monkeys were impaired only slightly at making saccades to contralateral targets in the step task if the target duration was 1000 ms, such that the target was present during the saccade: latency increased, but increases in saccadic error were mild and increases in the frequency of trials in which a saccade was not made were insignificant. During FEF inactivation there usually was a direct correlation between the latency and the error of saccades made in response to contralateral targets. In the delay task, FEF inactivation increased the frequency of making premature saccades to ipsilateral targets. FEF inactivation had inconsistent and mild effects on saccadic peak velocity. FEF inactivation caused impairments in the ability to fixate lights steadily in contralateral space. FEF inactivation always caused an ipsiversive deviation of the eyes in darkness. In summary, our results suggest that the FEF plays major roles in (1) generating contraversive saccades to locations of extinguished or flashed targets, (2) maintaining contralateral fixations, and (3) suppressing inappropriate ipsiversive saccades. Received: 2 February 1996 / Accepted: 26 February 1997     

The initiation of smooth pursuit eye movements and saccades in normal subjects and in “express-saccade makers”

A vast knowledge exists about saccadic reaction times (RT) and their bi- or multimodal distributions with very fast (express) and regular RT. Recently, there has been some evidence that the smooth pursuit system may show a similar RT behavior. Since moving targets usually evoke a combined pursuit/saccade response, we asked which processes influence the initiation of pursuit and saccadic eye movements. Furthermore, we investigated whether and how the pursuit and saccadic system interact during the initiation of eye movements to moving targets. We measured the RT of the initial smooth pursuit (iSP) response and of the first corrective saccade and compared the RT behavior of both. Furthermore we compared the behavior of the corrective saccades to moving targets to that of saccades to stationary targets, known from the literature. The stimulus consisted of a target that moved suddenly at constant velocity (ramp). In addition, prior to the movement, a temporal gap, a position step or a combination of both could occur (gap-ramp, step-ramp, gap-step-ramp, respectively). Differently from most previous studies, we chose step and ramp with the same direction to provoke competition between the pursuit and saccade system. For the first time we investigated pursuit initiation in "express-saccade makers" (ES makers), a subject group known to produce an abnormally high percentage of short-latency saccades in saccade tasks. We compared their results with subject groups who were either naive or trained with respect to saccade tasks. The iSP started at approximately 100 ms, which corresponds to express saccade latencies. These short iSP-RT occurred reflex-like and almost independent of the experimental task. A bimodal frequency distribution of RT with a second peak of longer iSP-RT occurred exclusively in the ramp paradigm. The RT of the first corrective saccades in a pursuit task were comparable with that in a saccade task and depended on the stimulus. The ability of ES makers to produce a high number of express saccades was transferred to corrective saccades in the pursuit task, but not to pursuit initiation. In summary, short-latency pursuit responses differ from express saccades with respect to their independence of experiment and subject group. Therefore, a simple analogy to express saccades cannot be drawn, although some mechanisms seem to act similarly on both the pursuit and the saccade system (such as disengagement of attention with the gap effect). Furthermore, we found evidence that the initial pursuit response and the first corrective saccade are processed independently of each other. The first corrective saccades to moving targets behave like saccades to stationary targets. Normal pursuit but abnormal saccade RT of ES makers can be explained by recent theories of superior colliculus (SC) function in terms of retinal error handling.     

Effects of eye position on saccades evoked electrically from superior colliculus of alert cats

Electrical stimulation was carried out in the intermediate and deep gray layers of the superior colliculus in alert cats. The heads of the animals were fixed, and their eye movements were recorded with the scleral search coil method. Stimulation in the anterior two-thirds of the colliculus with long-duration pulse trains produced multiple saccades, as in the primate (45, 51), but their directions and amplitudes were influenced significantly by the initial position of the eye. Stimulation in the posterior part of the colliculus evoked saccades that appeared to be "goal-directed," whereas stimulation at the extreme caudal edge of the colliculus yielded centering saccades. These observations confirm previous reports of Roucoux and Crommelinck (48) and Guitton et al. (24). Saccades evoked during bilateral simultaneous stimulation of the superior colliculi were also dependent on the initial position of the eye. At certain relative intensities of stimulation on the two sides, saccades failed to occur when the eye was within a particular part of the oculomotor range. When the eye was outside this region, the same stimuli triggered an eye movement that drove the eye toward the zone of saccade failure. These findings indicate that saccadic commands resulting from focal collicular stimulation in the cat can be modified by information about current eye position. It is not certain where in the brain this occurs or by what neural mechanisms, but a local feedback model of the saccadic control system (46) can account for the main observations. The functional significance of these findings depends in large measure on the degree to which focal collicular stimulation reproduces naturally occurring patterns of neural activity.     

Recovery of saccadic dysmetria following localized lesions in monkey superior colliculus

Damage to the monkey superior colliculus (SC) produces deficits in the generation of saccadic eye movements. Recovery of the accuracy of saccades is rapid, but saccadic latency and peak velocity recover slowly or not at all. In the present experiments we revisited the issue of recovery of function following localized lesions of the SC using three methodological advances: implantation of wire recording electrodes into the SC for the duration of the experiment to ensure that we were recording from the same site on the SC map on successive days; quantification of changes in saccadic accuracy, latency, and velocity using a standard grid of target points in the visual field contralateral to the SC lesion; measurement of movement field size to quantitatively determine any changes following the lesion. We confirmed a decrease in saccadic accuracy following electrolytic lesions of the SC, and we found that this dysmetria recovered within about 4 days. Saccadic latency increased for saccades to the lesion area and this deficit persisted. Peak saccadic velocity decreased immediately after the lesion and decreased further during the 10 days to 2 weeks of the experiment. We found no indication of an expansion of the movement fields of neurons adjacent to the lesion area. This lack of reorganization suggests that movement field changes within the SC cannot mediate the recovery in accuracy of the saccade. The persistence of the latency and velocity deficits despite the recovery of amplitude deficits indicates that saccadic latency and peak velocity are dependent upon the SC whereas saccadic amplitude is not.     

Influence of gap and overlap paradigms on saccade latencies and vergence eye movements in seven-year-old children

The latency of eye movements is influenced by the fixation task; when the fixation stimulus is switched off before the target presentation (gap paradigm) the latency becomes short and express movements occur. In contrast, when the fixation stimulus remains on when the target appears (overlap paradigm), eye movement latency is longer. Several previous studies have shown increased rates of express saccades in children; however the presence of an express type of latency for vergence and combined movements in children has never been explored. The present study examines the effects of the gap and the overlap paradigms on horizontal saccades at far (150 cm) and at close (20 cm) viewing distances, on vergence along the median plane, and on saccades combined with convergence or divergence in 15 normal seven-year-old children. The results show that the gap paradigm produced shorter latency for all eye movements than the overlap paradigm, but the difference was only significant for saccades at close viewing distances, for divergence (pure and combined), and for saccades combined with vergence. The gap paradigm produced significantly higher rates of express latencies for saccades at close viewing distances, for divergence, and for saccades combined with divergence; in contrast, the frequencies of express latencies for saccades at far viewing distances and for convergence (pure or combined) were similar in the gap and the overlap paradigms. Interestingly, the rate of anticipatory latencies (<80 ms) was particularly high for divergence in the gap paradigm. Our collective findings suggest that the initiation of saccades at close viewing distances and of divergence is more reflexive, particularly in the gap paradigm. The finding of frequent anticipatory divergence that occurs at similar rates for seven-year-old children (this study) and for adults (Coubard et al., 2004, Exp Brain Res 154:368–381) indicates that predictive initiation of divergence is dominant.     

Reaction times of the eye and the hand of the monkey in a visual reach task

Two monkeys were trained to execute saccadic eye movements and reach movements with the hand from a central fixation point to a peripheral target. Reaction times for both movements were compared on a trial-by-trial basis. If the fixation point was extinguished before the target appeared (gap condition), extremely short latency saccades (85 ms) (express saccades) were obtained, that were followed by short latency reach movements (250 ms), but there was no correlation between them on a trial-by-trial basis. If the fixation point remained visible (overlap condition), very short (100 ms) and rather long (220 ms) latency saccades were observed. Long saccadic latencies correlated strongly with the reach reaction times. Short latency saccades were followed by reach movements of reaction times longer than those observed after express saccades in the gap condition; there was no correlation between them. All reaction times varied systematically with practice.     

Nociceptive responses of midbrain dopaminergic neurones are modulated by the superior colliculus in the rat

Midbrain dopaminergic neurones exhibit a short-latency phasic response to unexpected, biologically salient stimuli. In the rat, the superior colliculus is critical for relaying short-latency visual information to dopaminergic neurones. Since both collicular and dopaminergic neurones are also responsive to noxious stimuli, we examined whether the superior colliculus plays a more general role in the transmission of short-latency sensory information to the ventral midbrain. We therefore tested whether the superior colliculus is a critical relay for nociceptive input to midbrain dopaminergic neurones. Simultaneous recordings were made from collicular and dopaminergic neurones in the anesthetized rat, during the application of noxious stimuli (footshock). Most collicular neurones exhibited a short-latency, short duration excitation to footshock. The majority of dopaminergic neurones (92/110; 84%) also showed a short-latency phasic response to the stimulus. Of these, 79/92 (86%) responded with an initial inhibition and the remaining 14/92 (14%) responded with an excitation. Response latencies of dopaminergic neurones were reliably longer than those of collicular neurones. Tonic suppression of collicular activity by an intracollicular injection of the local anesthetic lidocaine reduced the latency, increased the duration but reduced the magnitude of the phasic inhibitory dopaminergic response. These changes were accompanied by a decrease in the baseline firing rate of dopaminergic neurones. Activation of the superior colliculus by the local injections of the GABA(A) antagonist bicuculline also reduced the latency of inhibitory nociceptive responses of dopaminergic neurones, which was accompanied by an increased in baseline dopaminergic firing. Aspiration of the ipsilateral superior colliculus failed to alter the nociceptive response characteristics of dopaminergic neurones although fewer nociceptive neurones were encountered after the lesions. Together these results suggest that the superior colliculus can modulate both the baseline activity of dopaminergic neurones and their phasic responses to noxious events. However, the superior colliculus is unlikely to be the primary source of nociceptive sensory input to the ventral midbrain.     

The direct visuo-motor pathway in mammalian superior colliculus; novel perspective on the interlaminar connection

The mammalian superior colliculus (SC) is a center controlling the orienting behaviors such as saccadic eye movements. The superficial layers receive visual inputs and the deeper layers send descending motor command to the brainstem and spinal cord. Existence of the interlaminar connection from the superficial to the deeper layers has been an issue of debate during the last two decades. Recent studies have proved the existence of the interlaminar connection by introducing the in vitro slice preparations. When the collicular circuit is disinhibited from gamma-amino butyric acid A (GABA(A)) receptor-mediated inhibition, the signal transmission through the interlaminar connection is enormously facilitated and neurons in the deeper layers exhibit bursting response to stimulation of the superficial layer with non-linear amplification mechanism that depends on the activation of NMDA-type glutamate receptors. In addition, the cholinergic input to the intermediate layer lowers the threshold for the bursting response and facilitates the transmission through the interlaminar connection via activation of nicotinic receptors. The signal transmission through the interlaminar connection may lead to execution of extremely short latency saccades called express saccades.     

Processing of retinal and extraretinal signals for memory-guided saccades during smooth pursuit

It is an essential feature for the visual system to keep track of self-motion to maintain space constancy. Therefore the saccadic system uses extraretinal information about previous saccades to update the internal representation of memorized targets, an ability that has been identified in behavioral and electrophysiological studies. However, a smooth eye movement induced in the latency period of a memory-guided saccade yielded contradictory results. Indeed some studies described spatially accurate saccades, whereas others reported retinal coding of saccades. Today, it is still unclear how the saccadic system keeps track of smooth eye movements in the absence of vision. Here, we developed an original two-dimensional behavioral paradigm to further investigate how smooth eye displacements could be compensated to ensure space constancy. Human subjects were required to pursue a moving target and to orient their eyes toward the memorized position of a briefly presented second target (flash) once it appeared. The analysis of the first orientation saccade revealed a bimodal latency distribution related to two different saccade programming strategies. Short-latency (<175 ms) saccades were coded using the only available retinal information, i.e., position error. In addition to position error, longer-latency (>175 ms) saccades used extraretinal information about the smooth eye displacement during the latency period to program spatially more accurate saccades. Sensory parameters at the moment of the flash (retinal position error and eye velocity) influenced the choice between both strategies. We hypothesize that this tradeoff between speed and accuracy of the saccadic response reveals the presence of two coupled neural pathways for saccadic programming. A fast striatal-collicular pathway might only use retinal information about the flash location to program the first saccade. The slower pathway could involve the posterior parietal cortex to update the internal representation of the flash once extraretinal smooth eye displacement information becomes available to the system.     

The Saccadic system more readily co-processes orthogonal than co-linear saccades

Real-life visual tasks such as tracking jumping objects and scanning visual scenes often require a sequence of saccadic eye movements. The ability of the ocular motor system to parallel process saccades has been previously demonstrated. We recorded the monocular eye movements of five normal human subjects using the magnetic search coil technique in a double step paradigm. Initial target jumps were always purely horizontal or purely vertical. We were interested in the latency to onset of the second saccade as a function of direction in relation to the first saccade. When the inter stimulus interval (ISI) was 150 or 180 ms orthogonal second saccades were of significantly shorter latency than second co-linear saccades. When the ISI was 250 ms the latencies of orthogonal and co-linear second saccades were statistically indistinguishable. Based on these findings it is postulated that the ocular motor system can more readily co-process orthogonal than co-linear saccades.     

The fixation area of the cat superior colliculus: effects of electrical stimulation and direct connection with brainstem omnipause neurons

The superior colliculus has long been recognized as an important structure in the generation of saccadic displacements of the visual axis. Neurons with presaccadic activity encoding saccade vectors are topographically organized and form a motor map. Recently, neurons with fixation-related activity have been recorded at the collicular rostral pole, at the area centralis representation or fixation area. Another collicular function which deals with the maintenance of fixation behavior by means of active inhibition of orientation commands was then suggested. We tested that hypothesis as it relates to the suppression of gaze saccades (gaze = eye in space = eye in head + head in space) in the head-free cat by increasing the activity of the fixation cells at the rostral pole with electrical microstimulation. Long stimulation trains applied before gaze saccades delayed their initiation. Short stimuli, delivered during the gaze saccades, transiently interrupted both eye and head components. These results provide further support for a role in fixation behavior for collicular fixation neurons. Brainstem omnipause neurons also exhibit fixation-related activity and have been shown to receive a direct excitatory input from the superior colliculus. To determine whether the collicular projection to omnipause neurons arises from the fixation area, the deep layers of the superior colliculus were electrically stimulated either at the rostral pole including the fixation area or in more caudal regions where stimulation evokes orienting responses. Forty-nine neurons were examined in three cats. 61% of the neurons were found to be orthodromically excited by single-pulse stimulation of the rostral pole, whereas only 29% responded to caudal stimulation. In addition, stimuli delivered to the rostral pole activated, on average, omnipause neurons at shorter latencies and with lower currents than those applied in caudal regions. These results suggest that excitatory inputs to omnipause neurons from the superior colliculus are principally provided by the fixation area, via which the superior colliculus could play a role in suppression of gaze shifts.     

Amplitude transition function of human express saccades

The gap paradigm often promotes the occurrence of express saccades, which are supposed to be short latency, visually guided saccades, often forming a separate peak in saccadic latency distribution. We designed six experiments in which we compared the amplitudes of anticipatory, express and regular saccades, for various conditions of target eccentricities, target direction, and predictability. Then, saccadic amplitude was expressed as a continuous function of latency, for the various target eccentricities. From the obtained results, it is proposed that a saccade of a given amplitude is prepared during the gap period, on the basis of internal cues. The latency range of express saccades is a transition zone when the target begins to influence the already prepared saccade. The resulting amplitude will be a weighted average of the value determined during the gap and of the value defined by the target, the weighting being determined by the latency of the saccade. If the preprogrammed saccade is wrongly directed, the target will not be able to correct the saccadic amplitude and the express saccade will have the same amplitude as anticipatory saccades. Regular saccades are delayed sufficiently so that a wrongly directed preprogrammed saccade can be canceled or the amplitude of a rightly directed saccade can be adjusted according to the exact position of the visual target.     

What is the coordinate frame utilized for the generation of express saccades in monkeys?

The latencies of saccades to suddenly appearing eccentric targets can have a bimodal distribution, with an early, express peak, and a late, regular peak (Fischer and Boch 1983, Brain Res 260: 21–26). Express saccades usually are a product of learning. The purpose of this study was to determine whether this learning is specific to the relative position of the target in space, the orbital position of the eye, or the vector of the saccade to be produced. Further, it was asked whether and how the frequency with which express saccades are generated is influenced by the immediately preceding saccadic vector and the familiarity of the targets. To this end, rhesus monkeys were trained to make saccadic eye movements to single targets and to two sequential targets that appeared at various positions relative to the head, relative to the initial fixation spot and relative to each other. The results show that the frequency with which express saccades are generated is determined by the saccadic vector that has to be generated and not by the relative position of a target in space, the orbital position of the eye, the immediately preceding saccadic vector, or the familiarity of the targets.     

Modification of saccadic eye movements by GABA-related substances. I. Effect of muscimol and bicuculline in monkey superior colliculus

Our previous observations led to the hypothesis that cells in the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) tonically inhibit saccade-related cells in the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (SC). Before saccades to visual or remembered targets, cells in SNr briefly reduce that inhibition, allowing a burst of spikes of SC cells that, in turn, leads to the initiation of a saccadic eye movement. Since this inhibition is likely to be mediated by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), we tested this hypothesis by injecting a GABA agonist (muscimol) or a GABA antagonist (bicuculline) into the superior colliculus and measured the effects on saccadic eye movements made to visual or remembered targets. An injection of muscimol selectively suppressed saccades to the movement field of the cells near the injection site. The affected area expanded over time, thus suggesting the diffusion of muscimol in the SC; the area never included the other hemifield, suggesting that the diffusion was limited to one SC. One of the monkeys became unable to make any saccades to the affected area. Saccades to visual targets following injection of muscimol had longer latency and slightly shorter amplitudes that were corrected by subsequent saccades. The most striking change was a decrease in the peak velocity of the saccade, frequently to less than half the preinjection value. Saccades to remembered targets following injection of muscimol also showed an increase in latency and decrease in velocity, but in addition, showed a striking decrease in the accuracy of the saccades. The trajectories of saccades became distorted as if they were deflected away from the affected area. After muscimol injection, the area over which spontaneous eye movements were made shifted toward the side ipsilateral to the injection. Saccades toward the contralateral side were less frequent and slower. In nystagmus, which developed later, the slow phase was toward the contralateral side. In contrast to muscimol, injection of bicuculline facilitated the initiation of saccades. Injection was followed almost immediately by stereotyped and apparently irrepressible saccades made toward the center of the movement field of the SC cells at the injection site. The monkeys became unable to fixate during the tasks; the fixation was interrupted by saccadic jerks made to the affected area of the visual field and then back to the fixation point.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

The ability to produce express saccades as a function of gap interval among schizophrenia patients

The ability to produce express sacccades is associated with adequate functioning of saccadic burst cells in the superior colliculus. Saccadic burst cells appear to be under the inhibitory control of both the collicular and the dorsolateral frontal fixation systems. Twenty schizophrenia patients and 20 nonpsychiatric subjects were presented a saccade task that included five different gap intervals (0, 100, 200, 300, and 400 ms) between fixation point offset and peripheral target onset (at ±4°). All subjects generated the highest frequency of express saccades in trials with a gap interval of 200 ms. Schizophrenia patients had an increased frequency of express saccades across gap intervals, especially for targets presented in the right visual field. The groups did not differ in the percentages of anticipatory saccades or saccadic amplitudes. These results suggest that schizophrenia patients' saccadic burst cells in the superior colliculus are functioning adequately, but may be consistent with dys-function of dorsolateral frontal cortex and/or its interconnecting subcortical circuitry.     

Less attention is more in the preparation of antisaccades, but not prosaccades

To make a saccadic eye movement to a target we must first attend to it. It is therefore not surprising that diverting attention increases saccade latency, but is latency increased in all cases? We show that attending to a peripheral discrimination task has a paradoxical effect. If the stimulus to be attended appears shortly (100 to 300 ms) before an eye movement is made in a direction opposite to that of a presented stimulus (an antisaccade), its latency is reduced to well below baseline performance. In contrast, latencies for saccades toward the stimulus (prosaccades) are increased under similar conditions. This paradoxical effect may arise from competition between the processes mediating prosaccades and antisaccades. When the discrimination task is presented at the critical moment, it interferes with a reflexive prosaccade, allowing faster antisaccades. The results suggest that the suppression of sensorimotor reflexes can facilitate volitional motor acts.