Comparing Swedish hospital discharge records with death certificates: implications for mortality statistics

BACKGROUND: The quality of mortality statistics is of crucial importance to epidemiological research. Traditional editing techniques used by statistical offices capture only obvious errors in death certification. In this study we match Swedish hospital discharge data to death certificates and discuss the implications for mortality statistics. METHODS: Swedish death certificates for 1995 were linked to the national hospital discharge register. The resulting database comprised 69 818 individuals (75% of all deaths), 39 872 (43%) of whom died in hospital. The diagnostic statements were compared at Basic Tabulation List level. RESULTS: The last main diagnosis and the underlying cause of death agreed in 46% of cases. Agreement decreased rapidly after discharge. For hospital deaths, the main diagnosis was reported on 83% of the certificates, but only on 46% of certificates for non-hospital deaths. Malignant neoplasms and other dramatic conditions showed the best agreement and were often reported as underlying causes. Conditions that might follow from some other disease were often reported as contributory causes, while symptomatic and some chronic conditions were often omitted. In 13% of cases, an ill-defined main condition was replaced by a more specific cause of death. CONCLUSIONS: There is no apparent reason to question the death certificate if the main diagnosis and underlying cause agree, or if the main diagnosis is a probable complication of the stated underlying cause. However, cases in which the main diagnosis cannot be considered a complication of the reported underlying cause should be investigated, and assessments made of the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of routinely linking hospital records to death certificates.     

Out-of-hospital coronary death in an urban population--validation of death certificate diagnosis. The Minnesota Heart Survey

To assess the validity of death certificate diagnoses of out-of-hospital coronary heart disease deaths, the authors studied a one-third random sample of out-of-hospital deaths occurring in 1979 in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, residents. Death certificates with diagnoses possibly containing coronary heart disease deaths were enumerated, and cause of death was recorded from the certificate in two ways: as the first listed ("immediate") cause and as the "underlying cause" assigned by a trained nosologist. Validation was performed by standardized physician review of information obtained about the death, which included one or more of the following: an interview with a relative or friend, physician report, autopsy report, medical record, and/or nursing home record. Missing information was frequent, but cases with at least an informant interview and/or autopsy report (82%) were representative and could be used for validation. The sensitivity and specificity of the underlying cause of coronary heart disease (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes 410-414, 427) on the death certificate were 90.3% and 82.7%, respectively, compared with the physician-assigned diagnosis. For the immediate cause, sensitivity and specificity were 90.3% and 67.9%, respectively. These findings suggest that the validity of death certificates for out-of-hospital coronary heart disease death is high, as assessed by this method of retrospective physician review.     

Use of death certificates in epidemiological studies, including occupational hazards: discordance with clinical and autopsy findings.

There has long been evidence of frequent inaccuracy of death certificates, with significant discordance between such designations and clinical and autopsy data. This exists for occupational diseases as well. The use of statistical rates based on death certificates has been seriously questioned despite their utility for total mortality. Programs to supplement death certificate data, particularly in occupational disease studies, may be helpful, and are reviewed.     

Risk factors associated with the classification of unspecified and/or unexplained causes of death in an occupational cohort.

In a matched case-control study of an occupational cohort in East Tennessee, data from the death certificates of 608 cases and controls were abstracted and analyzed in order to investigate possible risk factors associated with the certification on the death certificate of an ill-defined cause of death. There was a very strong association between the ill-defined classification and the certifier, especially if the certifier was a medical examiner (OR = 10.4, 95% CI: 6.0, 18.0).     

Using death certificates and medical examiner records for adolescent occupational fatality surveillance and research: a case study

Death certificates and medical examiner records have been useful yet imperfect data sources for work-related fatality research and surveillance among adult workers. It is unclear whether this holds for work-related fatalities among adolescent workers who suffer unique detection challenges in part because they are not often thought of as workers. This study investigated the utility of using these data sources for surveillance and research pertaining to adolescent work-related fatalities. Using the state of North Carolina as a case study, we analyzed data from the death certificates and medical examiner records of all work-related fatalities data among 11- to 17-year-olds between 1990-2008 (N = 31). We compared data sources on case identification, of completeness, and consistency information. Variables examined included those on the injury (e.g., means), occurrence (e.g., place), demographics, and employment (e.g., occupation). Medical examiner records (90%) were more likely than death certificates (71%) to identify adolescent work-related fatalities. Data completeness was generally high yet varied between sources. The most marked difference being that in medical examiner records, type of business/industry and occupation were complete in 72 and 67% of cases, respectively, while on the death certificates these fields were complete in 90 and 97% of cases, respectively. Taking the two sources together, each field was complete in upward of 94% of cases. Although completeness was high, data were not always of good quality and sometimes conflicted across sources. In many cases, the decedent's occupation was misclassified as "student" and their employer as "school" on the death certificate. Even though each source has its weaknesses, medical examiner records and death certificates, especially when used together, can be useful for conducting surveillance and research on adolescent work-related fatalities. However, extra care is needed by data recorders to ensure that occupation and employer are properly coded when dealing with adolescent worker deaths.     

Impact of HIV infection on mortality and accuracy of AIDS reporting on death certificates.

To assess the impact of HIV infection on mortality and the accuracy of AIDS reporting on death certificates, we analyzed data from 6704 homosexual and bisexual men in the San Francisco City Clinic cohort. Identification of AIDS cases and deaths in the cohort was determined through multiple sources, including the national AIDS surveillance registry and the National Death Index. Through 1990, 1518 deaths had been reported in the cohort and 1292 death certificates obtained. Of the 1292 death certificates, 1162 were for known AIDS cases, but 9% of the AIDS cases did not have HIV infection or AIDS noted on the death certificate. Only 0.7% of the decedents had AIDS listed as a cause of death and had not been reported to AIDS surveillance. AIDS and HIV infection was the leading cause of death in the cohort, with the highest proportionate mortality ratio (85%) and standardized mortality ratio (153 in 1987), and the largest number of years of potential life lost (32,008 years). The devastating impact of HIV infection on mortality is increasing and will require continued efforts to prevent and treat HIV infection.     

Reporting of meticillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus on death certificates in Irish hospitals

The documentation of infection with meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on death certificates has been the subject of considerable public discussion. Using data from five tertiary referral hospitals in Ireland, we compared the documentation of MRSA and meticillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) on death certificates in those patients who died in hospital within 30 days of having MRSA or MSSA isolated from blood cultures. A total of 133 patients had MRSA or MSSA isolated from blood cultures within 30 days of death during the study period. One patient was excluded as the death certificate information was not available; the other 132 patients were eligible for inclusion. MRSA and MSSA were isolated from blood cultures in 59 (44.4%) and 74 (55.6%) cases respectively. One patient was included as a case in both categories as both MRSA and MSSA were isolated from a blood culture. In 15 (25.4%) of the 59 MRSA cases, MRSA was documented on the death certificate. In nine (12.2%) of the 74 patients with MSSA cases, MSSA was documented on the death certificate. MRSA was more likely to be documented on the death certificate than MSSA (odds ratio: 2.46; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-6.01; P < 0.05). These findings indicate that there may be inconsistencies in the way organisms and infections are documented on death certificates in Ireland and that death certification data may underestimate the mortality related to certain organisms. In particular, there appears to be an overemphasis by certifiers on the documentation of MRSA compared with MSSA.     

Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data

OBJECTIVES: Compare the discrimination of risk-adjustment models for primary cesarean delivery derived from medical record data and birth certificate data and determine if the two types of models yield similar hospital profiles of risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: The study involved 29,234 women without prior cesarean delivery admitted for labor and delivery in 1993-95 to 20 hospitals in northeast Ohio for whom data abstracted from patient medical records and data from birth certificates could be linked. STUDY DESIGN: Three pairs of multivariate models of the risk of cesarean delivery were developed using (1) the full complement of variables in medical records or birth certificates; (2) variables that were common to the two sources; and (3) variables for which agreement between the two data sources was high. Using each of the six models, predicted rates of cesarean delivery were determined for each hospital. Hospitals were classified as outliers if observed and predicted rates of cesarean delivery differed (p < .05). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Discrimination of the full medical record and birth certificate models was higher (p < .001) than the discrimination of the more limited common and reliable variable models. Based on the full medical record model, six hospitals were classified as statistical (p < .01) outliers (three high and three low). In contrast, the full birth certificate model identified five low and four high outliers, and classifications differed for seven of the 20 hospitals. Even so, the correlation between adjusted hospital rates was substantial (r = .71). Interestingly, correlations between the full medical record model and the more limited common (r = .84) and reliable (r = .88) variable birth certificate models were higher, and differences in classification of hospital outlier status were fewer. CONCLUSION: Birth certificates can be used to develop cesarean delivery risk-adjustment models that have excellent discrimination. However, using the full complement of birth certificate variables may lead to biased hospital comparisons. In contrast, limiting models to data elements with known reliability may yield rankings that are more similar to rankings based on medical record data.     

Validity of maternal and perinatal risk factors reported on fetal death certificates

We sought to estimate the accuracy, relative to maternal medical records, of perinatal risk factors recorded on fetal death certificates. We conducted a validation study of fetal death certificates among women who experienced fetal deaths between 1996 and 2001. The number of previous births, established diabetes, chronic hypertension, maternal fever, performance of autopsy, anencephaly, and Down syndrome had very high accuracy, while placental cord conditions and other chromosomal abnormalities were reported inaccurately. Additional population-based studies are needed to identify strategies to improve fetal death certificate data.     

Maternal pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and the risk of sudden infant death syndrome in offspring

To determine whether maternal exposure to pre-eclampsia/eclampsia during pregnancy increases the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in offspring, we conducted a population-based case-control study using the California linked birth and death certificate data. All infants who died of SIDS (ICD-9 code 798.0) during 1989-91 were identified as cases. More than 96% of the identified SIDS cases were diagnosed through autopsy. Ten controls who did not die from SIDS were randomly selected for each case from the birth certificate matched to the case on the year of birth. Among 2,029 cases and 21,037 controls included in the final analysis, mothers of 49 cases (2.4%) and 406 controls (1.9%) had a diagnosis of either pre-eclampsia or eclampsia noted on the birth certificate. After adjustment for maternal age, prenatal smoking, race/ethnicity, parity, maternal education, gestational age at the initial visit for prenatal care, infant year of birth and infant sex, maternal pre-eclampsia/ eclampsia during pregnancy was associated with a 50% increased risk of SIDS in the offspring (odds ratio = 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1, 2.0). Potential under-reporting of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia on the birth certificates was likely to be non-differential and is unlikely to explain the finding. Fetal hypoxia resulting from pre-eclampsia/ eclampsia or immunological aetiology affecting the risk of both pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and SIDS may explain the finding.     

Agreement of occupation and industry data on Rhode Island death certificates with two alternative sources of information

There is increasing interest in documenting the putative health effects of occupational hazards, prompting Federal and State efforts that rely primarily on occupational information obtained from the death certificate. Previous studies have assessed the agreement of occupational data on death certificates with actual lifetime employment by using current employment data from census records for comparisons. Such analyses have largely been confined to males. We compared lifetime occupational information obtained from a panel survey for both sexes with death certificate data for 446 deceased panel members. After adjusting for inadequate information, the occupation recorded on the death certificates of the men agreed with the occupation recorded in the survey 66 percent of the time. The comparable percentage for the industry where the deceased had been employed was 78 percent. Among the women's records, agreement on occupation was 65 percent, and on industry, 69 percent. Using another sample of death certificates, comparisons of the information for 322 decedents with city directory data produced similar results. The higher level of agreement for women was due in part to the large number who were reported as "housewives." In a separate analysis, the agreement rate for nonhousewives declined. Suggestions for improvements in the recording of occupational data and the constraints imposed by the use of death certificate data in occupational epidemiology are presented.     

Use of death certificates for mesothelioma surveillance.

Data from the Massachusetts Cancer Registry and death certificates were linked for mesothelioma cases reported to the registry from 1982 through 1987 to determine the extent to which the cause of death information that is given on the death certificate is useful in identifying mesothelioma cases for disease surveillance. Only 12 percent of all persons reported with mesothelioma who had died were detected using underlying cause of death codes for cancers of the peritoneum and pleura, which are commonly used to identify mesothelioma cases. The rate increased to 83 percent when death certificates were reviewed manually for any mention of mesothelioma. Surveillance using only the coded cause of death data currently available will result in a large underascertainment of mesothelioma cases.     

Cancer Occurrence in the Elderly: Agreement between Three Major Data Sources

PURPOSE: To explore agreement on cancer occurrence and site among Medicare Part A, Massachusetts Cancer Registry, and death certificates.METHODS: We linked these data sources with the cohort of the population-based East Boston Senior Health Project, a component of the National Institute on Aging’s Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly. The cohort consists of 905 subjects dying between January 1986 and December 1990.RESULTS: We detected the following agreements on cancer occurrence: hospitalization data and death certificates (kappa = 0.70), hospitalization and cancer registry data (kappa = 0.59), and cancer registry and death certificate data (kappa = 0.50). Measures of agreement changed little when the analyses were stratified by age, sex, calendar year and place of death, autopsy performance, cigarette smoking or alcohol consumption. Site-specific agreements were higher for colorectal and respiratory tract cancer compared to breast and prostate across all three comparisons.CONCLUSIONS: The results should assist epidemiologists to better understand the strengths and limitations of these data sources.     

How accurately is euthanasia reported on death certificates in a country with legal euthanasia: a population-based study

Background

Death certificates are the main source of information on the incidence of the direct and underlying causes of death, but may be unsuitable for monitoring the practice of medical assistance in dying, e.g. euthanasia, due to possible underreporting. This study examines the accuracy of certification of euthanasia.

Methods

Mortality follow-back survey using a random sample of death certificates (N?=?6871). For all cases identified as euthanasia we checked whether euthanasia was reported as a cause of death on the death certificate. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to evaluate whether reporting varied according to patient and decision-making characteristics.

Results

Through the death certificates, 0.7% of all deaths were identified as euthanasia, compared with 4.6% through the mortality follow-back survey. Only 16.2% of the cases identified from the survey were reported on the death certificate. Euthanasia was more likely to be reported on the death certificate where death was from cancer (14% covered), neurological diseases (22%) and stroke (28%) than from cardiovascular disease (7%). Even when the recommended drugs were used or the physician self-labelled the end-of-life decision as euthanasia, euthanasia was only reported on the death certificate in 24% of cases.

Conclusions

Death certificates substantially underestimate the frequency of euthanasia as a cause of death in Belgium. Mortality follow-back studies are essential complementary instruments to examine and monitor the practice of euthanasia more accurately. Death certificate forms may need to be modified and clear guidelines provided to physicians about recording euthanasia to ensure more accurate certification.

     

Comparison of occupation and industry information from death certificates and interviews

Information on occupation and industry obtained via an interview prior to death was compared to occupation and industry on the death certificate of 184 colon cancer patients in Utah. The data were coded blindly using a five-digit code. Overall, agreement in the five-digit codes was found for 63 per cent. The industry codes agreed for 67 per cent of the individuals, and the occupation was identical for 68 per cent. Agreement by subjective evaluation of the two data sources, disregarding the five-digit codes, was 73 per cent. There were no differences in agreement of the five-digit codes by age, sex, and county of residence. The number of years worked at the job given by interview was related to agreement. Misclassification occurred in a random manner. It is concluded that the use of death certificates to study the association of occupation and disease is most appropriate for pilot studies.     

Identification of Dementia: Agreement among National Survey Data, Medicare Claims, and Death Certificates

Objective. To estimate the proportion of seniors with dementia from three independent data sources and their agreement.
Data Sources. The longitudinal Asset and Health Dynamics among the Oldest Old (AHEAD) study ( n =7,974), Medicare claims, and death certificate data.
Study Design. Estimates of the proportion of individuals with dementia from: (1) self- or proxy-reported cognitive status measures from surveys, (2) Medicare claims, and (3) death certificates. Agreement using Cohen's κ ; multivariate logistic regression.
Principal Findings. The proportion varied substantially among the data sources. Agreement was poor ( κ : 0.14–0.46 depending upon comparison assessed); the individuals identified had relatively modest overlap.
Conclusions. Estimates of dementia occurrence based on cognitive status measures from three independent data sources were not interchangeable. Further validation of these sources is needed. Caution should be used if policy is based on only one data source.     

PDCA管理后死亡医学证明书填写质量分析

目的探讨PDCA管理对死亡医学证明书填写质量的影响。方法选择2018年10月—2019年5月我院实施PDCA管理前开具的死亡医学证明书68份作为对照组,选择2019年10月—2020年5月我院实施PDCA管理后开具的死亡医学证明书71份作为研究组,比较两组填写质量。结果研究组的死亡医学证明书患者基本信息填写完整率、准确率高于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组的死亡医学证明书死因项填写不规范率低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组的网络直报数据不准确率低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组的死亡医学证明书填报延时率低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组的死亡医学证明书填写质量评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论PDCA管理可保证死亡医学证明书填写完整性、准确性及规范性,提高填报质量,促进了上报的时效性,从而有效提高人口死亡信息登记管理水平。     

Multiple-race mortality data for California, 2000-2001

OBJECTIVES: To examine mortality rates and quality of race reporting for multiple-race individuals in California using the new multiple-race data available on the death certificate. METHODS: Death date were drawn from California vital statistics for 2000 and 2001. Denominator data were drawn from the 2000 census Modified Race Data Summary File. The authors calculated mortality rates and relative standard errors for multiple-race individuals as a whole and by county, and for the three largest reported multiple-race groups (African American and white, American Indian/Alaska Native and white, and Asian and white). RESULTS: Decedents reported to be of more than one race were disproportionately young, Hispanic, male, and never-married. Age-adjusted mortality rates for multiple-race groups were approximately one-sixth as high as rates for single-race individuals. There was substantial variability in rates for multiple-race decedents according to county of residence. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rates for multiple-race people were implausibly low, and death certificates for multiple-race individuals were geographically clustered. Race reporting on death certificates will need to be improved before accurate death rates can be calculated for those of multiple races.