Helicoidal suture: alternative treatment for complete rectal prolapse in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Optimal treatment for rectal prolapse is controversial. We describe a novel alternative treatment for high-risk patients with complete rectal prolapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen high-risk patients over 60 years old with complete rectal prolapse were examined. All patients had significant past medical history and were classified as grade III (ASA) surgical risk. The helicoidal suture technique is described. Postoperative parameters evaluated were morbidity, mortality, postoperative symptoms, recurrence and anal incontinence score. Median follow-up was 60 months. RESULTS: There were no operative complications or mortality in the series; one patient experienced recurrence. Median postoperative anal incontinence score was 6.06 (range 1-30; preoperative 23.6). CONCLUSION: This technique provides adequate functional outcomes and could be an effective therapeutic strategy against rectal prolapse in high-risk patients.     

Continence is improved after the ripstein rectopexy

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate anal manometric changes after Ripstein's operation for rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception and to study the clinical outcome following the operation, with special reference to anal incontinence. METHODS: Forty-two patients with rectal prolapse or rectal intussusception were subjected to anorectal manometry preoperatively and seven days and six months postoperatively. A detailed history was obtained from each patient preoperatively and six months postoperatively. RESULTS: Preoperatively, patients with rectal intussusception had higher maximum resting pressure (MRP) (52±23 mmHg) than patients with rectal prolapse (34±20 mmHg;P <0.01). In the group of patients with rectal prolapse, there was a postoperative increase in MRP after six months (P <0.001) but not after seven days. Maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) did not increase. Neither MRP nor MSP increased postoperatively in patients with internal rectal procidentia. Continence was improved postoperatively both in patients with rectal prolapse (P <0.01) and rectal intussusception (P <0.01). There was no postoperative increase in rectal emptying difficulties. CONCLUSION: Ripstein's operation often improved anal continence in patients with rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception. This improvement was accompanied by increased MRP in patients with rectal prolapse, indicating recovery of internal anal sphincter function. No postoperative increase in MRP was found in patients with rectal intussusception. This suggests an alternate mechanism of improvement in patients with rectal intussusception.Supported by grants from Kjell and Märta Beijers Stiftelse and Marianne and Marcus Wallenbergs Stiftelse.     

Recovery of the internal anal sphincter following rectopexy: A possible explanation for continence improvement

Twenty-one patients suffering from rectal prolapse (n=15) or internal rectal procidentia (n=6) were investigated clinically and by anorectal manometry prior to and six months following rectopexy. Rectal prolapse was associated with incontinence in 67% (10/15) of the patients preoperatively. The moderately or severely incontinent patients had lower than normal maximum anal resting pressures (MAP) and those with severe incontinence also had lower than normal maximum squeeze pressure (MSP). Postoperatively only 20% (3/15) of the patients remained incontinent and none of them suffered severe incontinence. MAP values increased significantly indicating that improvement of the function of the internal anal sphincter may be one of the factors contributing to better continence. Rectal sensibility was impaired in patients with rectal prolapse as compared to 15 controls. There was no postoperative change. Patients with internal rectal procidentia had normal MAP and MSP and no postoperative change could be demonstrated.     

Anorectal Physiology in Solitary Ulcer Syndrome: A Case-Matched Series

PURPOSE Solitary ulcer syndrome is a rare condition characterized by inflammation and chronic ulcer of the rectal wall in patients suffering from outlet constipation. Despite similar surgical options (rectopexy, anterior resection), solitary ulcer syndrome may differ from overt rectal prolapse with regard to symptoms and pathogenesis. The present work analyzed differences between these conditions in a case-control physiology study. METHODS From 1997 to 2002, 931 consecutive subjects were investigated in a single physiology unit for anorectal functional disorders. Standardized questionnaires, anorectal physiology, and evacuation proctography were included in a prospective database. Diagnosis of solitary ulcer syndrome was based on both symptoms and anatomic features in 25 subjects with no overt rectal prolapse (21 females and 4 males; mean age, 37.2 ± 15.7 years) and no past history of anorectal surgery. They were compared with age-matched and gender-matched subjects: 25 with outlet constipation (also matched on degree of internal procidentia), 25 with overt rectal prolapse without any mucosal change, and 14 with overt rectal prolapse and mucosal changes. RESULTS Subjects with solitary ulcer syndrome reported symptomatic levels (digitations, pain, incontinence) similar to those of patients with outlet constipation, but they had significantly more constipation and less incontinence than patients with overt rectal prolapse. Compared with each of the three control groups (dyschezia, rectal prolapse without mucosal change, and rectal prolapse with mucosal change), subjects with solitary ulcer syndrome more frequently had an increasing anal pressure at strain (15 vs. 5, 3, and 1, respectively ; P < 0.01) and a paradoxical puborectalis contraction (15 vs. 9, 1, and 1, respectively; P < 0.05). With respect to evacuating proctography, complete rectal emptying was achieved less frequently in this group (5 vs. 12, 23, and 10, respectively; P < 0.05). Compared with patients with overt rectal prolapse, mean resting and squeezing anal pressures were significantly higher in both groups of subjects with solitary ulcer syndrome and with outlet constipation. Prevalence and levels of anatomic disorders (perineal descent, rectocele) did not differ among the four groups except for rectal prolapse grade and prevalence of enterocele (higher in overt rectal prolapse group). Interestingly, and despite matched controls for degree of intussusception, individuals with solitary ulcer syndrome had circular internal procidentia more often compared with those suffering from outlet constipation without mucosal lesions (15 vs. 8, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION This case-controlled study quantifies functional anal disorders in patients suffering from solitary ulcer syndrome. Despite no proven etiologic factor, sphincter-obstructed defecation and circular internal procidentia both may play an important part in the pathogenesis and an exclusive surgical approach may not be appropriate in this context. Presented at the meeting of the American Gastroenterology Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, May 18, 2004.     

Manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence.

Sixty-three patients with complete rectal prolapse and/or faecal incontinence have undergone anal manometry and the results have been compared with an equal number of age- and sex-matched controls. Maximal basal pressure (MBP) and maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) were measured before and at four months and a year after treatment. The anal pressures of normal subjects are presented. Patients with rectal prolapse alone had normal anal pressures, whereas patients with incontinence with or without prolapse had significantly lower basal and squeeze pressures than controls. Successful surgical treatment of prolapse or incontinence did not produce significant change in anal canal pressures, whereas the combination of pelvic floor exercises and a continence aid was associated with a significant rise in MSP.     

Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency influences surgical outcome in treatment of rectal prolapse

Purpose: This study was undertaken to document the effect of pudendal nerve function on anal incontinence after repair of rectal prolapse. METHODS: Patients with full rectal prolapse (n=24) were prospectively evaluated by anal manometry and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) before and after surgical correction of rectal prolapse (low anterior resection (LAR; n=13) and retrorectal sacral fixation (RSF; n=11)). RESULTS: Prolapse was corrected in all patients; there were no recurrences during a mean 25-month follow-up. Postoperative PNTML was prolonged bilaterally (>2.2 ms) in six patients (3 LAR; 3 RSF); five patients were incontinent (83 percent). PNTML was prolonged unilaterally in eight patients (4 LAR; 4 RSF); three patients were incontinent (38 percent). PNTML was normal in five patients (3 LAR; 2 RSF); one was incontinent (20 percent). Postoperative squeeze pressures were significantly higher for patients with normal PNTML than for those with bilateral abnormal PNTML (145 vs.66.5 mmHg; P =0.0151). Patients with unilateral abnormal PNTML had higher postoperative squeeze pressures than those with bilateral abnormal PNTML, but the difference was not significant (94.8 vs.66.5 mmHg; P=0.3182). The surgical procedure did not affect postoperative sphincter function or PNTML. CONCLUSION: Injury to the pudendal nerve contributes to postoperative incontinence after repair of rectal prolapse. Status of anal continence after surgical correction of rectal prolapse can be predicted by postoperative measurement of PNTML.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.     

Anal Continence After Rectocele Repair

INTRODUCTION: Rectocele may be associated with both chronic constipation and anal incontinence. Several different surgical procedures have been advocated for rectocele repair. The aim of the present study was to evaluate anorectal function and clinical outcome in a consecutive series of patients who underwent selected endorectal or transperineal surgery for rectocele for whom operative treatment was determined by clinical and proctographic features. Attention was paid to the cohort of rectocele patients presenting with incontinence as a leading symptom. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients with symptomatic rectocele underwent surgical treatment at our institution. Fifty-eight of the patients were female (mean age 56; range, 21–70 years). Incontinence was graded according to a previously reported scoring system that accounts for the type and frequency of incontinence episodes. Preoperative anorectal manometry was performed using an open perfused polyethylene probe. Rectal sensation was recorded by balloon distention. Endoanal ultrasonography was performed with a 7.5-MHz probe. Preoperative defecography was performed at rest and on maximal squeeze and straining. Patients with obstructed defecation as their principal symptom, with associated mucosal rectal prolapse, underwent an endorectal procedure. For patients with associated anal incontinence (Grade B2 or greater), and without a rectal mucosal prolapse, a transperineal approach was performed with either an anterior external overlapping sphincteroplasty or levatorplasty. The median follow-up was 48 (range, 9–122) months. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality. Postoperative complications occurred in 18 patients (30 percent). Of 43 patients with incontinence, 34 (79 percent) were available for postoperative evaluation. None were fully continent. However, in 25 patients (73.5 percent), continence improved after surgery; half had only mucus soiling or loss of gas. Incontinence scores decreased (i.e., improved) from 4.8 ± 0.9 to 3.9 ± 0.9 (P = 0.002). A significant improvement was found both after transanal and perineal procedures. Only ten initially continent patients were available for postoperative assessment. All patients stated that they had clinical improvement in constipation. Their preoperative mean anal resting pressure was 62.5 ± 3.9 (standard error of the mean) mmHg, with a postoperative mean of 75.5 ± 7 mmHg. The preoperative mean squeeze pressure was 83.1 ± 8.5 mmHg, with a mean postoperative squeeze pressure of 88.5 ± 7.9 mmHg (P = not significant). The maximal tolerable volumes were all within normal limits, confirming the proctographic evidence that there were no cases of megarectum in our patient series. The pudendal nerve terminal motor latency was abnormal in all but two patients with incontinence (mean pudendal nerve terminal motor latency = 3.1; range, 1.2–4 milliseconds). Rectoceles recurred in six patients (10 percent): five after a Block procedure and one after a Sarles-type operation. The postoperative endosonographic appearance varied according to the nature of the procedure performed. CONCLUSION: There are few data concerning patients with rectocele who have associated anal incontinence, however, surgical decision analysis resulted in improvement in both constipation and incontinence in the majority of our patients with rectocele. Nevertheless, because none of the patients gained full continence postoperatively, pelvic floor rehabilitation might be also needed to achieve better sphincter function in patients with incontinence.     

Preoperative Anal Manometry Predicts Continence After Perineal Proctectomy for Rectal Prolapse

Purpose This study examines whether preoperative anal manometry and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency predict functional outcome after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse. Methods All adult patients treated by perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse from 1995 to 2004 were identified (N = 106). Forty-five patients underwent anal manometry and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing before proctectomy and they form the basis for this study. Results Perineal proctectomy with levatoroplasty (anterior 88.9 percent; posterior 75.6 percent) was performed in all patients, with a mean resection length of 10.4 cm. Four patients (8.9 percent) developed recurrent prolapse during a 44-month mean follow-up. Preoperative resting and maximal squeeze pressures were 34.2 ± 18.3 and 60.4 ± 30.5 mmHg, respectively. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing was prolonged or undetectable in 55.6 percent of patients. Grade 2 or 3 fecal incontinence was reported by 77.8 percent of patients before surgery, and one-third had obstructed defecation. The overall prevalence of incontinence (77.8 vs. 35.6 percent, P < 0.0001) and constipation (33.3 vs. 6.7 percent, P = 0.003) decreased significantly after proctectomy. Patients with preoperative squeeze pressures >60 mmHg (n = 19) had improved postoperative fecal continence relative to those with lower pressures (incontinence rate, 10 vs. 54 percent; P = 0.004), despite having similar degrees of preoperative incontinence. Abnormalities of pudendal nerve function and mean resting pressures were not predictive of postoperative incontinence. Conclusions Perineal proctectomy provides relief from rectal prolapse, with good intermediate term results. Preoperative anal manometry can predict fecal continence rates after proctectomy, because patients with maximal squeeze pressures >60 mmHg have significantly improved outcomes. Supported exclusively using institutional funding. Presented at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, April 30 to May 5, 2005.     

Soiling: anorectal function and results of treatment

Forty-five patients with soiling but without faecal incontinence were evaluated by means of anorectal function investigations (anal manometry, rectal capacity and saline infusion test). The causes of soiling and the effect of treatment on both soiling and anorectal function were studied. The results were compared with a control group of 161 patients without soiling or incontinence. The diagnoses were haemorrhoids (10), mucosal prolapse (7), rectal prolapse (6), fistulae (5), proctitis (3), faecal impaction (2), rectocele with intussusception (2), scars after fistulectomy (2) and others (8). Simple inspection and proctoscopy were generally sufficient to establish a diagnosis. For two patients the diagnosis rectocele was made after defaecography. Anorectal test results did not differ between the soiling and control group, did not contribute to establish a diagnosis and did not change after treatment. Only patients with a rectal prolapse had abnormal results in anorectal function tests: a low basal sphincter pressure and a limited continence reserve. Appropriate therapy resulted in complete recovery (44%) or improvement of symptoms (29%).     

Is rectal intussusception a cause of idiopathic incontinence?

PURPOSE: The cause of rectal intussusception in patients primarily dominated by symptoms of anal incontinence has not been fully elucidated, especially for patients with idiopathic incontinence. METHODS: Between 1991 and 1996, 51 patients referred with a diagnosis of idiopathic incontinence were prospectively evaluated by standard questionnaire, clinical examination, defecography, and anal manometry. Fourteen female patients were identified with rectal intussusception and were treated by transabdominal rectopexy. Postoperatively, clinical assessment and anal manometry were performed at regular intervals. RESULTS: Continence was improved after rectopexy (P<0.01). The postoperative increases in the anal resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure, and maximum tolerated volume were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Rectopexy improved anal incontinence in patients with rectal intussusception. The cause of rectal intussusception in anal incontinence could not be explained by functional improvement of the internal anal sphincter tone or an increase in the maximum tolerated volume. Rectal intussusception may be a cause of idiopathic incontinence in patients; however, larger prospective studies are required to support this concept.     

Anorectal dysfunction and rectal prolapse in progressive systemic sclerosis

Our aim was to characterize the clinical spectrum of anorectal dysfunction among eight patients with progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS) who presented with altered bowel movements with or without fecal incontinence. The anorectum was assessed by physical examination, proctosigmoidoscopy, and anorectal manometry. There was concomitant involvement of the other regions of the digestive tract in all patients as determined by barium studies, endoscopy, or manometry: eight esophageal, three gastric, four small bowel, and two colonic. Seven patients had fecal incontinence, and four also had second-degree complete rectal prolapse. Abnormal anorectal function, particularly abnormal anal sphincter resting pressures, were detected in all patients; anal sphincter pressures were lower in those with rectal prolapse. Rectal capacity and wall compliance were impaired in seven of seven patients. Successful surgical correction of prolapse in three patients resulted in restoration of incontinence for six months and seven years in two of the three patients. We conclude that rectal dysfunction and weakness of the anal sphincters are important factors contributing, respectively, to altered bowel movements and fecal incontinence in patients with gastrointestinal involvement by PSS. Rectal prolapse worsens anal sphincter dysfunction and should be sought routinely as it is a treatable factor aggravating fecal incontinence in patients with PSS.This work was presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association, May 1992, and appears in abstract form in Gastroenterology 1992;102:A473.Supported in part by the General Clinical Research Center Grant 00585 from the National Institutes of Health.     

Transanal repair of rectocele and full rectal mucosectomy with one circular stapler: a novel surgical technique

Abstract We present a new surgical stapling technique for treatment of rectocele when associated with internal mucosal prolapse or haemorrhoids using only one circular mechanical stapler. Eight female patients, mean age 53 years (range, 42–70), complaining of obstructed defecation with vaginal digitation because of rectocele associated with internal mucosal prolapse underwent transanal repair of rectocele and rectal mucosectomy using one circular stapler between April and July 2004. A running horizontal mattress suture was placed through the base of the rectocele including mucosa, submucosa and the muscle layer of the whole anterior anorectal junction wall. The prolapsed mucosa and the muscular layer were then excised with an electrical scapel. Acontinuous pursestring rectal mucosa suture was placed 0.5 cm before the previous anterior mucosa and muscle layers resected wound, including the anorectal junction wall which was kept separate from the posterior vaginal wall by a Babcock forceps. Posteriorly, the pursestring suture included only mucosal and submucosal layers. The stapled suture was positioned between normal anterior rectal wall and the anal canal, 0.5 cm above the pectinate line. The stapler was then closed, fired and withdrawn. One patient complained of a perianal hematoma on the seventh postoperative day, requiring surgical excision. Postoperative defecography showed correction of the rectocele and outlet obstruction disappeared in all patients. This novel combined manual-stapled technique for rectocele and rectal internal mucosal prolapse seems to be a safe procedure and the preliminary results are encouraging. Further investigations have to be performed to assess long-term outcome in a larger number of patients.     

Abdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse: preliminary results of a new technique

Purpose Although the technique for the surgical repair of rectal prolapse has advanced over the years, no ideal procedure has been found. We aim to test a new surgical procedure for abdominal rectopexy that uses the greater omentum to support the rectum below the rectopexy, to reconstruct the anorectal angle and dispense with the need for synthetic mesh, thus reducing the risk of infection.Methods A series of ten patients, all young and medically fit, underwent repair surgery for rectal prolapse with the new rectopexy technique. Some patients had concomitant sigmoidectomy. Preoperative and postoperative assessment included a clinical examination, anal manometry and defecography.Results Follow-up lasted a mean of 56.4 months. None of the patients had recurrent rectal prolapse or infection. Postoperative assessment at 24 months disclosed significant improvements in all the bowel and sphincter variables assessed. The 8 patients who had severe incontinence preoperatively had notably improved and 4 were fully continent, 3 moderately incontinent, and only 1 patient had persistently high levels of incontinence. In only 1 patient who initially had severe incontinence, continence completely regressed and severe constipation developed. Maximal basal pressure values increased significantly after surgery (p=0.0025), although they increased slightly less evidently in patients in whom marked incontinence persisted at postoperative follow-up. Maximal voluntary contraction pressure also increased significantly after surgery (p=0.0054), although the values changed less than those for basal pressure. During rest, squeeze and straining, and in all the patients who regained continence, even those who recovered it only partly, surgery substantially reduced the anorectal angle. The reduction during rest was statistically significant (p=0.0062).Conclusions The rectopexy technique we tested in patients with rectal prolapse avoids the need for synthetic mesh, and provides good results in terms of bowel and sphincter function, without infection or recurrence.     

Selection criteria for anterior rectal wall repair in symptomatic rectocele and anterior rectal wall prolapse

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the outcome and changes produced by an endorectal anterior wall repair in objective functional parameters using anorectal manometry and defecography and to asses their usefulness in the selection of patients for the operation. METHODS: Between 1986 and 1990, we performed a prospective study of 76 consecutive patients with symptomatic rectocele and/or an anterior rectal wall prolapse. All patients were studied prospectively according to a fixed protocol. Standard questionnaire, defecation diary, clinical examination, defecography, and anal manometry were performed preoperatively and three to four months postoperatively. RESULTS: Three months postoperatively, 38 patients (50 percent) had no complaints at all (excellent result), 32 (42 percent) had only a minor complaint (good result), and in 6 patients (8 percent) the complaints were essentially unchanged (unsatisfactory result). After one year, similar figures were obtained. The postoperative mean stool frequency in all patients after three months was significantly increased (P <0.05) but not after one year. Postoperative defecographies showed a complete absence or significant diminution of the rectocele at three months and were significantly correlated with relief of symptoms. An inverse correlation was found between improvement in incontinence grade after operation and (larger) preoperative volume at which urge to defecate was elicited, making it a good predictor of improvement in incontinence by the operation. CONCLUSIONS: The anterior rectal wall repair positively influences rectal sensation in patients with incontinence and/or obstructed defecation caused by a rectocele and/or an anterior rectal wall prolapse. Anorectal manometry was useful in studying the beneficial physiologic effects of the endorectal repair. In patients with no previous pelvic surgery, a large urge to defecate volume is a good predictor of a good clinical outcome.     

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in male patients with external rectal prolapse is associated with a high reoperation rate

Background

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy has been used to treat male patients with external rectal prolapse, but evidence to support this approach is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of this new abdominal rectopexy surgical technique in men.

Methods

This was a retrospective multicenter study. Adult male patients who were operated on for external rectal prolapse using ventral rectopexy in five tertiary hospitals in Finland between 2006 and 2014 were included in the study. Patient demographics, detailed operative, postoperative and short-term follow-up data were collected from patient registers in participating hospitals. A questionnaire and informed consent form was sent to all patients. The questionnaire included scores for anal incontinence, obstructed defecation syndrome, urinary symptoms and sexual dysfunction. The main outcome measure was the incidence of recurrent rectal prolapse. Surgical morbidity, the need for surgical repair due to recurrent symptoms and functional outcomes were secondary outcome measures.

Results

A total of 52 adult male patients with symptoms caused by external rectal prolapse underwent ventral rectopexy. The questionnaire response rate was 64.4 %. Baseline clinical characteristics and perioperative results were similar in the responder and non-responder groups. A total of 9 (17.3 %) patients faced complications. There were two (3.8 %) serious surgical complications during the 30-day period after surgery that necessitated reoperation. None of the complications were mesh related. Recurrence of the prolapse was noticed in nine patients (17 %), and postoperative mucosal anal prolapse symptoms persisted in 11 patients (21 %). As a result, the reoperation rate was high. Altogether, 17 patients (33 %) underwent reoperation during the follow-up period due to postoperative complications or recurrent rectal or mucosal prolapse. According to the postoperative questionnaire data, patients under 40 had good functional results in terms of anal continence, defecation, urinary functions and sexual activity.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is a safe surgical procedure in male patients with external prolapse. However, a high overall reoperation rate was noticed due to recurrent rectal and residual mucosal prolapse. This suggests that the ventral rectopexy technique should be modified or combined with other abdominal or perineal methods when treating male rectal prolapse patients.

     

Combined perineal and endorectal repair of rectocele by circular stapler: a novel surgical technique

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to present a new technique for treatment of disabling rectocele when associated with internal mucosal prolapse or hemorrhoids using a 33-mm circular stapler. METHODS: Eight female patients complaining of obstructed defecation because of distention rectocele associated with internal mucosal prolapse or hemorrhoids and perineal descent entered the study. The rectovaginal septum was opened by diathermy up to the end of the rectal wall weakness. The perineal wound and the anus were held open by a self-retractor. Using a transparent anoscope (PPH 01 system), 2 mucosal pursestrings were prepared 5 and 8 to 9 cm distant from the dentate line. Posteriorly, only the submucosa was included in the pursestring; anteriorly, it included the rectal wall, which was kept separate from the vaginal wall. A transanal 33-mm circular stapler was then used to close the rectocele and treat the mucosal prolapse. Before closing the perineum a levatorplasty was fashioned. RESULTS: One patient had a vaginal tear during dissection of the septum, which healed spontaneously in one month. No other complications were recorded. Postoperative defecography showed correction of the rectocele and the posterior rectal prolapse in all patients. In two of them, a small lateral diverticulum could be seen, although this was asymptomatic. After a median follow-up of 12 months, all had significantly improved defecation (chronic constipation score dropped from 14.3 to 5, P < 0.04). CONCLUSION: Combined perineal and endorectal stapler repair of rectocele may be a useful new surgical tool for correcting distention rectocele associated with mucosal prolapse or hemorrhoids and perineal descent in selected patients. A longer follow-up on a larger number of patients is needed to confirm these preliminary results.     

Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: surgical notes and results

Recently the surgical treatment of hemorrhoids using a circular stapler device has gained increasing approval. The Longo's procedure reduces the rectal mucosal and hemorrhoid prolapse using a circular stapler to resect transversally a mucosal-submucosal rectal ring in order to restore the correct anatomical relationships of the anal canal structures. The recent availability of a dedicated instrument kit (PPH01 Ethicon Endo-Surgery) allowed an easy diffusion of this technique. From March 1999 to September 2001, 198 patients with III-IV degree hemorrhoids were treated by a single expert surgeon using the dedicated kit instrumentation (PPH01) according to the Longo's technique, adopting some variations from the original procedure: 1) The anal dilator is not fixed to the perianal skin with forceps or stitches but is kept by the assistant. 2) In performing the purse-string suture particular care must be given to the apposition of the stitches at the same level also in the posterolateral side where there is a natural trend to apply the stitches at a lower level; furthermore the last stitch of the purse-string suture must be overlapped to the first one in order to allow a better hemostasis when the knot is tightened. 3) After having performed the purse-string and having resected the mucosa and submucosa, an accurate hemostasis with U-shaped 3/0 vicryl stitches firmly reduces the postoperative bleeding. We recorded pain scores, short- and long-term complications (included moderate-severe pain, persistent pain), recurrences and postoperative hospital stay. The data of the last 40 consecutive patients who underwent stapled hemorrhoidectomy were compared with the data obtained by 40 consecutive patients who underwent Milligan-Morgan diathermic hemorrhoidectomy for III-IV degree non-circumferential hemorrhoids by the same surgeon. In the 198 stapled hemorrhoidectomy cases the rate of postoperative moderate-severe pain and persistent pain were 6% and 2.5% respectively, the rate of short-term and long-term bleeding were 4.5% and 3.5%, the recurrence rate was 2.5%. The mean postoperative stay was 1.6 days. The stapled group had significantly lower postoperative moderate-severe pain, bleeding and soiling than the Milligan-Morgan group.     

Laparoscopic rectovaginopexy for rectal prolapse

Background Open rectovaginopexy is an effective procedure for the treatment of both rectal prolapse and anterior rectocele. This study investigates our results of laparoscopic rectovaginopexy (LRVP). Methods A consecutive series of 14 patients (median age, 73 years; range 24–92) with rectal prolapse was planned for LRVP. Pre-, per- and postoperative parameters were recorded. Followup was performed at the outpatients’ clinic. Results The median length of hospital stay was 6 days (range, 3–14). There was one fatal cerebrovascular accident 14 days postoperatively; this patient was excluded from further analysis. Median follow-up was 7 months (range, 0.75–38). During follow-up, 11 of 13 patients (85%) experienced resolution or major improvement of their symptoms. Anal incontinence was diminished in 9 of 13 cases (69%). Constipation improved in 2 of 3 patients (66%). These three patients experienced a combination of both anal incontinence and costipation, preoperatively. Recurrence occurred in 2 patients (15%). Two others had a minor residual mucosal prolapse. No patients reported symptoms suggestive of operation-induced constipation or dyspareunia. Conclusions LRVP is feasible, and seems to be an effective procedure for rectal prolapse. No operationinduced constipation was observed in this series. Taking into account the age and co-morbidities of these patients, morbidity and mortality may be considered acceptable. An erratum to this article is available at .     

Combined biofeedback, physiotherapy and electrostimulation for fecal incontinence

Different outcomes are reported in the literature following pelvic floor rehabilitation for fecal incontinence, possibly due to the type of procedure employed, whether biofeedback or physiotherapy or electrostimulation. The aim of the present study is to analyze the results achieved in a group of patients treated with a combination of the three procedures. Thirty-two patients (24 females) affected by fecal incontinence underwent a course of combined rehabilitation (CR); 23 of them had anal surgery prior to CR, for rectal mucosal prolapse and hemorrhoids in most cases. Eighteen had anal manometry before and after CR. Sixteen underwent anal ultrasound prior to treatment. Patients were taught perineal exercises, biofeedback was either sensory or electromyographic, and electrostimulation was performed with a 10–20 MHz endoanal probe. Twenty-seven patients were available for follow-up. The mean incontinence score improved from 4.0±0.8 to 2.1±1.7 (mean±sd) (p<0.001); 19 patients (70%) were satisfied after CR, and 11 (44%) were fully continent. Post-treatment manometry showed an increased amplitude of squeeze pressure in 50% of the cases, whereas 61% had an increase in duration, but only 27% of them had a positive clinical outcome. Rectal evacuation thresholds improved in 55% of the cases and 86% of them had a corresponding positive clinical outcome. At ultrasound, 6 patients showed intact anal sphincters and had a positive outcome following CR. Pelvic floor rehabilitation seems to be effective for the management of fecal incontinence when carried out combining different types of procedures. No significant correlation was found between manometric and clinical response to the treatment. An increase of rectal sensation may be responsible for the clinical improvement. Received: 25 August 2000 / Accepted in revised form: 20 October 2000     

经直肠标本取出式3D腹腔镜低位直肠癌前切除术远切端两种处理方式对比研究

目的探讨直肠癌经肛门直肠标本取出式3D腹腔镜低位直肠前切除术远切端两种处理方式对临床结果的影响。 方法回顾性分析同济大学附属东方医院2016年1月至2018年3月接受经直肠标本取出式3D腹腔镜低位直肠癌前切除术患者40例的临床资料,按照远切端处理不同方式分为2组：（1）经直肠标本取出（双吻合器法）组29例：经肛门直肠取出根治标本,再以直线切割关闭器切断并关闭远端直肠,采用传统双吻合器法吻合;（2）经直肠标本取出（单吻合器法）组11例：经肛门直肠取出根治标本,直肠残端以倒刺线全层荷包缝合关闭,行单吻合器直肠结肠端端吻合。两组均行预防性末端回肠造口术。分析比较两组术中（手术时间、出血量）、术后指标（肛门排气时间、住院时间、术后进食流质时间）,并观察治疗期两组相关并发症。采用电话随访或调查的形式,对末端造口回纳术后1年以上患者采用Wexner失禁评分评估术后肛门括约肌功能。 结果两组年龄、性别、BMI指数、肿瘤浸润深度、手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间、进食流质时间、住院时间、并发症均无明显差异（P>0.05）;根据WIS评分,随访时间超过1年的26例患者中,20例（76.9%）患者术后肛门功能良好（WIS评分≤10分）,无严重肛门失禁患者。 结论经肛门直肠标本取出式3D腹腔镜低位直肠前切除术中,采用单吻合器或双吻合器处理方式的临床效果无明显差异。