Induction characteristics of thiopentone/suxamethonium, propofol/alfentanil or halothane alone in children aged 1-3 years.

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of three different induction techniques, with or without neuromuscular block, on tracheal intubation, haemodynamic responses and cardiac rhythm. Ninety children, aged 1-3 years, undergoing day-case adenoidectomy were randomly allocated to three groups: group TS received thiopentone 5 mg kg-1 and suxamethonium 1.5 mg kg-1, group H 5 Vol.% halothane and group PA alfentanil 10 micrograms kg-1 and propofol 3 mg kg-1 for induction of anaesthesia. No anti-cholinergics were used. Holter-monitoring of the heart rate and rhythm was started at least 15 min before induction of anaesthesia and continued until 3 min after intubation. Tracheal intubation was performed by an anaesthetist blinded to the induction method and judged as excellent, moderate or poor according to ease of laryngoscopy, position of vocal cords and incidence of coughing after intubation. Tracheal intubation was successful at the first attempt in all children in groups TS and H and but only in 80% in group PA (P = 0.001). Intubating conditions were excellent in 22 (73%), 22 (73%) and one (3%) of the patients in groups TS, H and PA, respectively (P = 0.001). Cardiac dysrhythmias (supraventricular extrasystole or junctional rhythm) occurred in two (7%) patients in groups PA and H each (NS). Bradycardia occurred in 0 (0%), four (14%) and six (21%) children in groups TS, H and PA, respectively (P = 0.007 PA vs. TS, P = 0.03 H vs. TS). In conclusion, induction of anaesthesia with propofol 3 mg kg-1 and alfentanil 10 micrograms kg-1 without neuromuscular block did not provide acceptable intubating conditions in children 1-3 years, although it preserved arterial pressure better than thiopentone/suxamethonium or halothane. Cardiac dysrhythmias were few regardless of the induction method.     

Comparison of propofol and methohexital for dental and maxillofacial surgery

A prospective study has been undertaken to compare a new intravenous anaesthetic agent, propofol, to methohexitone in 40 ASA I or II patients aged between 18 and 50 years undergoing maxillo-facial surgery and divided into two groups. Intramuscular premedication was standardized for all patients. In group I, propofol 2 mg X kg-1 was injected over 1 min in a peripheral venous line with fentanyl 0.86 microgram X kg-1, followed by an infusion of propofol 5 mg X kg-1 X h-1 and fentanyl 3 micrograms X kg-1 X h-1. In group II, the fentanyl dosage was the same as in group I, whilst methohexitone 3 mg X kg-1 was given for induction and 4.5 mg X kg-1 X h-1 for maintenance of anaesthesia. The following were recorded during induction, maintenance and recovery; haemodynamic parameters using a non invasive method; respiratory parameters; quality of anaesthesia; side-effects. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test and qualitative analysis using the Schwartz comparison test at 2%. The following results were found: the quality of anaesthesia with propofol was superior to that of methohexitone during the three stages of anaesthesia. The duration of induction was similar in both groups, but the quality of induction (occurrence of more minor side-effects; p less than 0.05) and intubation was in favour of propofol (p less than 0.05). During maintenance, stability of anaesthesia and a lesser incidence of side-effects were again in favour of the propofol group, in which a slower rate was also found (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Continuous propofol infusion versus enflurane in children operated on for strabismus. Comparison of the quality of anesthesia and recovery conditions

In children, the use of a continuous infusion of propofol has not yet been reported. A study was therefore designed to compare the characteristics of anaesthesia and recovery when either propofol or enflurance was used as the main anaesthetic agent. All 42 children (14 girls, 28 boys), ASA I and scheduled for corrective squint surgery under general anaesthesia, received 350 micrograms.kg-1 midazolam and 40 micrograms.kg-1 atropine intrarectally 20 min before induction, which was carried out with 3 mg.kg-1 propofol intravenously in 20 s. The patients were then randomly assigned to two groups, according to the drug used for maintenance: group P (n = 21) received a continuous intravenous infusion of propofol, 18 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the first 30 min and 15 mg.kg-1.h-1 thereafter; group E (n = 21) received 2.5%, then, after 30 min, 2% enflurane. Both groups were given 15 micrograms.kg-1 dextromoramide and 0.09 mg.kg-1 vecuronium. During anaesthesia, the following parameters were monitored: systolic (Pasys), diastolic (Padia) and mean arterial (Pa) pressures, heart rate (fc), the presence or not of an oculocardiac reflex with or without a 20% fall in fc which responded to 10-15 micrograms.kg-1 atropine, the appearance of a cardiac dysrhythmia, duration of anaesthesia and the delay before extubation. Recovery was assessed 1, 2, 4 and 6 h postoperatively by using both clinical and psychomotor criteria, the latter being adapted to children having one or both eyes occluded.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol with rocuronium for modified rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia

We compared the use of sevoflurane and propofol with three different doses of rocuronium for modified rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia. One hundred and forty adult patients were randomly allocated to have a rapid-sequence intravenous induction with propofol 2-3 mg.kg-1 (group P) or an inhalational induction with sevoflurane 8% in oxygen, using a vital capacity technique (group S). Following loss of the eyelash reflex, cricoid pressure was applied and 20 patients in each group were administered rocuronium 0.3 (groups P/0.3 and S/0.3), 0.45 (groups P/0.45 and S/0.45) or 0.6 (groups P/0.6 and S/0.6) mg.kg-1. An additional 10 patients in each group received only saline placebo in place of the muscle relaxant (groups P/Saline and S/Saline). Laryngoscopy was started 60 s later and intubating conditions evaluated by a blinded anaesthetist according to a standard scoring system. Intubating conditions were acceptable in one patient and no patient, respectively, following induction with sevoflurane and propofol without the muscle relaxant. The conditions were acceptable in 30, 55 and 90% of subjects with sevoflurane induction, and in 45, 80 and 90% of subjects with propofol induction following 0.3, 0.45 and 0.6 mg.kg-1 of rocuronium, respectively (no significant difference for each dose of rocuronium). The present study shows that intubating conditions during a rapid-sequence induction using rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1 following induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol are similar.     

Propofol as a sole agent for paediatric day care diagnostic ophthalmic procedures: comparison with halothane anaesthesia

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to study the feasibility of total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol in spontaneously breathing children undergoing ophthalmic procedures. METHODS: Fifty-five children (aged 6 months to 5 years) were randomly allocated to receive either propofol bolus (until loss of eyelash reflex) followed by infusion [group P (n=29)] or halothane 3-4% for induction, followed by 1-2% in 70% nitrous oxide and oxygen via face mask [group H (n=28)]. Dose for induction and maintenance, intraoperative adverse events, time to recovery (on an Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale, 5 at each level) and duration of procedure were recorded. All children in both groups, were anaesthetized successfully. RESULTS: 4.0 +/- 0.7 mg x kg(-1) and 5.1 +/- 1.0 mg x kg(-1) of propofol were required for loss of eyelash reflex and tolerance of the ophthalmic speculum, respectively. An infusion rate of 8.3 +/- 1.7 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) was needed for maintenance of anaesthesia; 3.4 +/- 0.5%, 3.6 +/- 0.4% and 1.4 +/- 0.4% halothane was needed for induction, tolerance of the eye speculum and maintenance of anaesthesia, respectively. Induction and recovery were significantly faster with halothane compared with propofol [induction - 38.3 +/- 6.6 s (group H)/60.9 +/- 15.2 s (group P) (P < 0.001); recovery 12.8 +/- 4.6 min (group H)/27.0 +/- 23.3 min (group P) (P < 0.001)]. Apnoea, coughing and breath-holding were seen only in group H. Group P had significantly higher incidence of involuntary movements (minor degree) (n=6) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Propofol is a feasible option for paediatric diagnostic ophthalmic procedures with the advantage over halothane of providing complete access to the eye.     

Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol,alfentanil, and oxygen-air: three different dosage schemes

Three different dosage schemes of propofol infusions combined with a fixed-rate alfentanil infusion were investigated in total intravenous anaesthesia. In 30 premedicated patients, divided at random into three groups, anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg.kg-1 immediately followed by an alfentanil infusion 10 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 as a loading dose which was decreased after ten minutes to a maintenance dose of 1 microgram.kg-1.min-1. Vecuronium bromide 0.1 mg.kg-1 was used as the muscle relaxant. After induction of anaesthesia a propofol infusion 2 mg.kg-1.hr-1 was started in group A, 3 mg.kg-1.hr-1 in group B and 4 mg.kg-1 hr-1 in group C. At signs of light anaesthesia supplementary bolus doses of 20 mg propofol and 1 mg alfentanil were given. The patients' lungs were ventilated with air-oxygen (FIO2 0.35). The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures showed no statistical significant differences between the three groups. A significant (P less than 0.01) decrease of the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures was present after induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation. Recovery was uneventful in all but one patient, who had ventilatory depression that responded to naloxone (0.2 mg IV). Awareness did not occur in any patient. The only difference between the three groups was the higher number of supplementary bolus doses of propofol and alfentanil needed in group A (P less than 0.01). In total intravenous anaesthesia propofol 3 and 4 mg.kg-1.hr-1 as a maintenance dose combined with a two-step fixed-rate alfentanil infusion provided smooth anaesthesia and uneventful rapid recovery.     

Effects of propofol on intraocular pressure in surgery of strabismus in children

Propofol was assessed for eye surgery in 20 children. ASA group I or II, 2-14 year-old, randomly assigned to 2 equal groups. Premedication, analgesia and muscle paralysis were similar in both groups. Group P patients were given an induction dose of 4 mg.kg-1 propofol, followed by an infusion of 15 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the first half hour, and then 10 mg.kg-1.h-1 to maintain anaesthesia. Group C patients were given 10 mg.kg-1 thiopentone for induction and halothane for maintenance. The quality of anaesthesia was assessed by monitoring adverse effects, heart rate, blood pressure, the length of anaesthesia, the delay of the first spontaneous breath and eye opening, and extubation. Intraocular pressure was measured before and 3 min after intubation, and 5 min after extubation. The quality of anaesthetic induction and maintenance were very similar in both groups. Pain occurred more frequently at the injection site with propofol (p less than 0.01). Children in group P recovered more quickly, and extubation was possible much earlier in this group (p less than 0.05). However, restlessness was significantly more frequent in group P (n = 9) than in group C (n = 1) (p less than 0.01). Systolic, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were significantly lower in group P (p less than 0.05; 0.001; 0.001 respectively). No significant decrease in intraocular pressure in both groups was observed. The use of propofol for eye surgery in children is acceptable, despite some restlessness during recovery.     

Haemodynamic effects of induction of general anaesthesia with propofol during epidural anaesthesia

PURPOSE: To clarify whether propofol administration during thoracic or lumbar epidural anaesthesia intensifies the haemodynamic depression associated with epidural anaesthesia. METHODS: Patients (n = 45) undergoing procedures of similar magnitude were randomly divided into three study groups: a control group (n = 15) receiving general anaesthesia alone and two study groups undergoing thoracic (n = 15) and lumbar epidural anaesthesia (n = 15) before induction of general anaesthesia. All patients received 2 mg.kg-1 propofol at a rate of 200 mg.min-1, followed by a continuous infusion of 4 mg.kg-1.hr-1. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were measured at baseline, three minutes after induction, and one minute after tracheal intubation in all three groups and at 20 min after epidural anaesthesia was established in the thoracic and lumbar groups. RESULTS: Following epidural anaesthesia, MAP decreased from 94 +/- 14 (SD) at baseline to 75 +/- 11 mmHg (P < 0.0001) in the thoracic group and from 92 +/- 12 to 83 +/- 15 mmHg in the lumbar group. After propofol administration, MAP decreased further in the thoracic group to 63 +/- 9 mmHg (P = 0.0077) and to 67 +/- 10 mmHg (P = 0.0076) in the lumbar group. The MAP following propofol induction in the thoracic group (P < 0.0001) and in the lumbar group (P = 0.0001) was lower than MAP in the control group (81 +/- 9 mmHg). HR decreased only in response to thoracic epidural anaesthesia (P = 0.0066). CONCLUSION: The hypotensive effects of propofol are additive to those of epidural anaesthesia, resulting in a profound decrease in mean arterial pressure.     

Haemodynamic comparison of propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia with midazolam-fentanyl anaesthesia in CABG patients without preoperative heart failure

This study was designed to compare prebypass haemodynamics under total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) using midazolam-fentanyl (group M) and propofol-fentanyl (group P) combinations. Sixteen adult patients undergoing CABG were studied with patients in group M and P (n = 8 each) given intravenous midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1.h-1 and propofol 4 mg.kg-1.h-1 with fentanyl 25 micrograms.kg-1 until sternotomy, respectively. Following induction of anaesthesia, cardiac index and heart rate decreased significantly (30% and 20% in both groups, p < 0.05) these variables returned to baseline on completion of sternotomy. In addition, in group P mean arterial pressure decreased significantly (about 15%) following induction and there were no ischaemic signs. Overall for MAP there was no significant difference between the two groups. LVSWI and RVSWI were reduced by around 25% in both groups. Only the change in LVSWI reached statistical significance (p < 0.05). This reduction may have exert a caridioprotectant action by decreasing myocardial oxygen consumption. We conclude that both TIVA techniques represent an acceptable anaesthetic regimen for use in cardiac anaesthesia.     

Maintenance and recovery characteristics after sevoflurane or propofol during ambulatory surgery in children with epidural blockade

PURPOSE: To compare the maintenance and recovery characteristics after sevoflurane with those after propofol in children with epidural blockade. METHODS: Fifty unpremedicated, children ASA I-II, 2-8 yr of age, scheduled for elective urological surgery as outpatients, were randomly allocated to receive either: 1) sevoflurane for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia or 2) propofol for induction (2-3 mg.kg-1 i.v.) and for maintenance (5-10 mg.kg-1.hr-1 i.v.). All children received N2O 70% in oxygen before induction and throughout the anaesthetic, rocuronium for neuromuscular blockade and a lumbar or caudal epidural block before incision. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), recovery times and all side effects during maintenance and recovery were recorded by a blinded observer. Adverse events during the first 24 hr were also recorded. RESULTS: Mean HR increased 5-10% after induction in both groups reaching a maximum by five minutes. Heart rate returned to baseline by skin incision in the sevoflurane group and by 10 min after induction in the propofol group. During maintenance, HR decreased by 10-20% below baseline values by 20 min in the propofol group only, where it remained for the remainder of the anaesthetic. Similarly, SBP increased by 10% after induction of anaesthesia in both groups, but returned to baseline by 10 min. Light anaesthesia occurred in four (16%) children, all in the propofol group. Emergence and recovery indices were similar in the two groups. DISCUSSION: Sevoflurane and propofol exhibit similar maintenance and recovery profiles when combined with epidural analgesia in children undergoing ambulatory surgery.     

Effects of propofol, propofol-nitrous oxide and midazolam on cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during sufentanil anaesthesia for major spinal surgery

Recording of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (CSEP) enables monitoring of spinal cord function. We studied the effects of propofol, propofol-nitrous oxide or midazolam during sufentanil anaesthesia on CSEP monitoring during major spinal surgery. Thirty patients with normal preoperative CSEP were allocated randomly to one of the following anaesthesia regimens: propofol (2.5 mg kg-1 followed by 10-6 mg kg-1 h-1) with or without nitrous oxide, or midazolam (0.3 mg kg-1 followed by 0.15 mg kg-1 h-1) combined with sufentanil 0.5 microgram kg- 1 h-1 in the propofol and midazolam groups, or 0.25 microgram kg-1 h-1 in the propofol-nitrous oxide group. CSEP were elicited by alternate right and left tibial posterior nerve stimulation and recorded before and after induction (15 min, 1, 2 and 3 h), and during skin closure. CSEP latencies were not significantly modified in the three groups. CSEP amplitude decreased significantly in the propofol-nitrous oxide group (from mean 2.0 (SEM 0.3) to 0.6 (0.1) microV; P < 0.05) but not in the propofol (from 1.8 (0.6) to 2.2 (0.3) microV) or midazolam (1.7 (0.5) to 1.6 (0.5) microV) groups. The time to the first postoperative voluntary motor response (recovery) delay was significantly greater in the midazolam group (115 (19) min) compared with the propofol and propofol-nitrous oxide groups (43 (8) and 41 (3) min, respectively). Consequently, the use of propofol without nitrous oxide can be recommended during spinal surgery when CSEP monitoring is required.      

Sevoflurane versus propofol for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia with the laryngeal mask airway in children

We compared patient outcomes for propofol vs sevoflurane with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) using either spontaneous breathing (SB) or pressure controlled ventilation (PCV). One hundred and twenty children undergoing minor surgery below the umbilicus were randomly assigned to receive either (1) propofol 3 mg.kg-1 followed by a maintenance infusion of 5 mg.kg-1.h-1, or (2) induction with sevoflurane 7% followed by maintenance with 1.7%. Following LMA insertion, patients were given atracurium and underwent PCV if surgery was expected to last > or = 30 min. The following assessments were made: time to LMA insertion/removal, airway problems, cardiorespiratory effects and recovery characteristics. The first time insertion success rates were similar, but insertion time was shorter with sevoflurane (115 +/- 67 s vs 252 +/- 107 s, P < 0.0001). One patient coughed during placement, but there were no other problems during any phase of anaesthesia in any group. Heart rate was higher in the sevoflurane group following insertion, during maintenance and emergence (all P < 0.03). There were no differences in blood pressure and oxygen saturation among groups PECO2 in the SB group was unaffected by the agent used. Emergence was more rapid (232 +/- 104 s vs 348 +/- 127 s, P < 0.0001) and postoperative agitation more common (15% vs 0%, P = 0.02) with sevoflurane. There were no differences in the Aldrete scores among groups. Patient outcome was similar for the SB and PCV groups. We concluded that the techniques described here using propofol and sevoflurane are equally suitable for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia with the LMA in children undergoing minor surgery below the umbilicus. Emergence is more rapid, but postoperative agitation more common with sevoflurane.     

Randomized comparison of outcome after propofol-nitrous oxide or enflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia in operations of long duration

A randomized, prospective, comparative study was performed to evaluate induction characteristics, haemodynamic changes and recovery in 60 ASA I-II patients undergoing mainly gynaecological laparotomies with either propofol or thiopentone-enflurane anaesthesia. The propofol group (n = 30) received 2 mg.kg-1 propofol for induction of anaesthesia followed by propofol infusion. The thiopentone-enflurane group (n = 30) received thiopentone 4 mg.kg-1 for induction followed by enflurane (0.5-2 per cent). All patients received nitrous oxide (66 per cent] in oxygen begun one minute after tracheal intubation, and fentanyl (1.5 micrograms.kg-1) four minutes prior to induction. Other drugs administered during or after anaesthesia were similar among the groups. Haemodynamic measurements were similar between propofol and enflurane groups except after tracheal intubation when the mean arterial pressure was lower in the propofol group (P less than 0.05). The propofol group had significantly less (P less than 0.01) emesis in the recovery room than the enflurane group. The propofol group experienced significantly less (P less than 0.05) dizziness, depression/sadness and hunger than the enflurane group in the postoperative period as assessed with a visual analogue questionnaire. We conclude that propofol provided better outcome than enflurane in terms of these nonvital but annoying outcome measures after relatively long intra-abdominal operations.     

Structured sedation programme for magnetic resonance imaging examination in children

One thousand, eight hundred and fifty-seven patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging following the establishment of a structured sedation programme. Forty-eight of these patients came from the intensive care unit with a secure airway and were therefore excluded from any further analysis. Oral sedation was to be given to children aged 5 years and below. For children >/= 6 years old, oral sedation could be given only if their level of co-operation was judged to be inadequate by the referring physician. Oral sedation consisted of chloral hydrate 90 mg x kg-1 (maximum 2.0 g) orally with or without rectal paraldehyde 0.3 ml x kg-1. All magnetic resonance imaging requests for children who failed oral sedation as well as those referred for general anaesthesia from the outset were reviewed by a consultant anaesthetist who then allocated patients to undergo the procedure with either general anaesthesia or intravenous sedation. Scans requiring intravenous sedation or general anaesthesia were performed in the presence of a consultant anaesthetist. Intravenous sedation consisted of either a propofol 0.5 mg x kg-1 bolus followed by an infusion (maximum 3 mg x kg-1 x h-1) or midazolam 0.2-0.5 mg x kg-1 boluses. General anaesthesia was given using spontaneous ventilation with a mixture of 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen and isoflurane following either inhalation (sevoflurane) or intravenous (propofol) induction. One thousand and thirty-nine (57.4%) of the scans were done without sedation whereas 93 scans were performed during the consultant anaesthetist supervised sessions. Oral sedation failed in 50 out of 727 patients (6.9%). Eighty-seven per cent of children aged 5 years and below needed sedation compared with 4.5% of those aged over 10 years. Two patients who had only received chloral hydrate developed significant respiratory depression. This structured sedation programme has provided a safe, effective and efficient use of limited resources.     

Quality of recovery in children: sevoflurane versus propofol

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane, with its low pungency and low blood and tissue solubility, is an attractive anaesthetic in paediatric outpatient surgery. Propofol-anaesthesia is recognised for its rapid and clear-headed emergence. This study was designed to compare emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia for tonsillectomy in children. METHODS: Children aged 3-10 years, undergoing elective tonsillectomy, were randomly assigned to receive propofol (n=25, induction with 3 mg x kg(-1), maintenance with 100-250 microg x kg(-1) min(-1)) or sevoflurane anaesthesia (n=25, induction 7 vol.%, maintenance 2-3 vol.%). Tracheal intubation was performed with alfentanil 20 microg x kg(-1) and atracurium 0.5 mg x kg(-1). Ventilation was controlled to maintain normocapnia and all patients received N2O/O2 (60:40 vol.%) for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. At the end of surgery infiltration of the operative sites with bupivacaine 2 mg x kg(-1) was provided for postoperative analgesia. Emergence, recovery, discharge times, and incidence of side effects were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Time to extubation (14 vs 15 min), time to response to simple verbal command (21 vs 21 min) and time to discharge from the recovery room (45 vs 50 min) were similar in the sevoflurane and propofol groups, respectively. There was a significantly greater incidence of postoperative agitation in the sevoflurane group (46%) compared with the propofol group (9%) (P=0.008). This did not, however, delay discharge from the recovery room. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was not significantly different (8% vs 0%; P=0.49). CONCLUSION: In children, recovery from anaesthesia with sevoflurane results in a higher incidence of agitation compared with propofol.     

Propofol versus etomidate in short-time urologic surgery]

Thirty patients, scheduled for short urological surgical procedures and ranked ASA 1 or 2, were randomly assigned to two homogenous groups. In group P, they were given a 2 mg.kg-1 bolus of propofol and 10 micrograms.kg-1 of alfentanil, followed by a continuous infusion of propofol (5 mg.kg-1.h-1) and 5 micrograms.kg-1 doses of alfentanil. In group E, they were given a 0.3 mg.kg-1 bolus of etomidate, followed by an infusion (1.5 mg.kg-1.h-1). The doses of alfentanil were the same as in group P. Further doses of either propofol (0.5 mg.kg-1) or etomidate (0.2 mg.kg-1) were used should anaesthesia prove not to be deep enough. The patients were not intubated, and breathed spontaneously. Surgery lasted a mean of 18.3 +/- 11.8 min (group P) and 18.8 +/- 9.4 min (group E). The following parameters were studied: the amount of each agent required for maintenance of anaesthesia, the duration of apnoea at induction, the quality of anaesthesia and of muscle relaxation, adverse effects (coughing, trismus, restlessness, nausea, vomiting), the time required for recovery, and its quality. In group P, there was a 27% decrease in arterial pressure, without any tachycardia or hypoxia, together with a quick recovery of excellent quality. On the other hand, in group E, there was little or no haemodynamic alteration, but there often was a trismus at induction. Hypoxia also occurred during induction with etomidate, being severe enough in one case to require tracheal intubation and artificial ventilation. The reasons for this hypoxia seemed to be the apnoea and the trismus, which tends to hinder assisted ventilation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Propofol and tourniquet induced ischaemia reperfusion injury in lower extremity operations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Extremity surgery with tourniquet to provide a bloodless field may be a good human model for ischaemia reperfusion (IR) injury. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of three different modes of propofol use on tourniquet induced IR injury in lower extremity operations. METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive ASA Grade I and II patients were randomized into three groups of 11 patients each. In the spinal group (Group S), after intrathecal anaesthesia, sedation was given with a propofol infusion at 2 mg kg-1 h-1 after a 0.2 mg kg-1 bolus dose and fentanyl 100 microg. In the general (Group G) and TIVA (Group T) groups, general anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg kg-1 with fentanyl 100 microg and maintained with inhalation of halothane or infusion of propofol respectively. Venous blood samples were obtained at different time points for measurements of plasma malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) levels. RESULTS: Plasma MDA levels were increased significantly in the Group G at 1 min before tourniquet release and 5 and 20 min after tourniquet release compared with before induction of general anaesthesia (baseline). Before intrathecal anaesthesia and before induction of general anaesthesia significantly decreased levels of MDA were observed both before and after tourniquet release compared to baseline. Plasma SOD and CAT concentrations were decreased significantly only at tourniquet release in the Group G compared with baseline. In the Groups S and T these enzymes were not changed significantly. Plasma GPx levels were not altered in any groups. CONCLUSION: Propofol administration may inhibit lipid peroxidation and restore antioxidant enzyme levels in extremity surgery requiring tourniquet application.     

Recovery after halothane anaesthesia induced with thiopental, propofol-alfentanil or halothane for day-case adenoidectomy in small children

We studied recovery from halothane anaesthesia in 93 children, aged 1-3 yr, undergoing day-case adenoidectomy. Children were allocated randomly to receive thiopental 5 mg kg-1 (group TH), alfentanil 10 micrograms kg- 1 and propofol 3 mg kg-1 (group PAH) or 5% halothane (group HH) for induction of anaesthesia. In group TH, tracheal intubation was facilitated with succinylcholine (suxamethonium) 1.5 mg kg-1. In groups PAH and HH, tracheal intubation was performed without neuromuscular block, and succinylcholine was used only if required. Anaesthesia was maintained with 1-3% halothane during spontaneous respiration. Times to achieving predetermined recovery end-points were recorded. Quality of recovery was assessed using a score of 1-9 (best to worst) for sedation, crying, restlessness and agitation. A postoperative questionnaire was used to determine the well-being of the child at home, 24 h after operation. Emergence from anaesthesia (response to non- painful stimuli) occurred earlier in group HH (mean 9 (SD 6) min) than in groups PAH (13 (6) min, P < 0.01) and TH (18 (14) min, P < 0.01). Sitting up, walking and home readiness were achieved earlier in groups PAH and HH than in group TH (P < 0.05 for each variable). Children in group TH were more sedated during the first 30 min after anaesthesia than those in the two other groups (P < 0.05) while emergence-related delirium was more common in group HH than in group TH (P < 0.01). Well- being at home was similar in all groups. We conclude that induction of halothane anaesthesia with propofol-alfentanil or halothane provided more rapid recovery and earlier discharge than that with thiopental.      

Perioperative anxiety and postoperative behavioural disturbances in children: comparison between induction techniques

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine if subhypnotic propofol reduces postoperative behavioural disturbances in children undergoing sevoflurane induction compared with intravenous propofol induction for elective adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy. METHODS: Following Ethics Committee approval and parental informed consent, ASA I-II, 120 children (2-10 yr) were recruited. Parents were not allowed to accompany their child. Unpremedicated children were randomly allocated to groups receiving inhalation induction with sevoflurane, 2-2.5 mg kg-1 intravenous propofol induction or inhalation induction with sevoflurane followed by subhypnotic dose of propofol (1 mg kg-1). Anaesthesia was maintained with 2-4% sevoflurane, O2 and N2O. Anxiety on arrival to operating theatre, at anaesthesia induction and 30 min after emergence was assessed. Parents completed a state-trait anxiety inventory test preoperatively and a post hospitalization behaviour questionnaire a week later to assess children's postoperative behavioural disturbances. Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon signed rank sum test, Bonferroni's test, Paired t-test, t-test, Pearson and Spearman's rank correlation test, chi2-test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The anxiety level at induction was high in all groups (P < 0.05). There was no difference between groups in respect to anxiety at other measurement times. A relation between preoperative anxiety level and postoperative behavioural disturbances was determined (P < 0.05). Some behavioural disturbances as nightmare/night fear and desire of sleeping with parents were rarely seen in intravenous propofol induction group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Addition of subhypnotic dose of propofol to sevoflurane induction did not reduce the incidence of postoperative behavioural disturbances.     

Propofol auto-co-induction as an alternative to midazolam co-induction for ambulatory surgery

We propose the use of an intravenous propofol/propofol auto-co-induction technique as an alternative to propofol/midazolam for induction of anaesthesia. We have studied 54 unpremedicated ASA 1 or 2 patients undergoing day-stay anaesthesia for minor orthopaedic surgery. All received 10 micrograms.kg-1 or alfentanil before induction, followed by either midazolam 0.05 mg.kg-1, propofol 0.4 mg.kg-1 or saline, and 2 min later, a propofol infusion at a rate of 50 mg.kg-1.h-1 until loss of eyelash reflex. We compared pre- and postinduction haemodynamic changes, complications at insertion of a laryngeal mask airway and recovery from anaesthesia in the three groups. Both co-induction techniques showed less postinduction hypotension and significant reduction of the total induction dose of propofol when compared to the control group. In the propofol/propofol group there was a decreased incidence of apnoea during induction of anaesthesia. These patients were discharged from hospital 2 h after the end of anaesthesia whereas patients in the midazolam/propofol group were discharged after 2 1/2 h (p < 0.001).