Elicitation of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations in response to gastric distension and meal ingestion

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of graded gastric barostat distension and meal-induced fundic relaxation on the elicitation of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR). In 15 healthy subjects, stepwise fundic distension and oesophageal manometry were performed simultaneously. Next, the effect of meal ingestion on proximal stomach volume and lower oesophageal sphincter function was studied. During stepwise barostat distension of the proximal stomach, a significant linear correlation between intragastric pressure (r = 0.91; P < 0.01) and the TLOSR rate during inflation and subsequent deflation (r = 0.96; P < 0.01) was found. A similar relationship was found for volume. In addition, after meal ingestion, the TLOSR rate increased significantly from 1.40 +/- 3 to 5.4 +/- 1.5 h-1 (P < 0.01) and 5.2 +/- 1.7 h-1 (P < 0.01), respectively, during the first and second 30-min postprandially. However, at similar calculated intragastric volumes, barostat distension led to a significantly higher TLOSR rate than the meal. Similarly, distension-induced increase in gastric wall tension, estimated from the measured bag pressure and volume using Laplace's law, was associated with significantly higher TLOSR rates (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the rate of TLOSRs in healthy volunteers is directly related to the degree of proximal gastric distension and pressure-controlled barostat distension is a more potent trigger of TLOSRs than a meal. The latter finding suggests that tension receptor activation is an important stimulus for TLOSRs.     

Effect of gastrin on proximal gastric motor function in humans

The present study was performed to investigate the effect of gastrin on proximal gastric motor and sensory function. Ten healthy volunteers participated in three experiments performed in random order during: (A) continuous intravenous infusion of saline (control) or (B) gastrin (15 pmol kg-1 h-1) reaching postprandial serum gastrin levels or (C) gastrin infusion (15 pmol kg-1 h-1) preceded by acute acid inhibition with intravenous omeprazole. Proximal gastric function was evaluated using a barostat with stepwise pressure and volume distensions and volume measurements during set pressure (MDP + 2 mmHg). Gastrin significantly increased the intragastric volume compared to control during MDP + 2 mmHg (276 +/- 39 mL vs. 159 +/- 9 mL; P < 0.01) and reduced phasic slow volume wave frequency (from 1.4 +/- 0.1 to 0.7 +/- 0.1 per min; P < 0.01). During isobaric distensions gastrin increased gastric compliance (42 +/- 4 mL mmHg-1 vs. 31 +/- 3 mL mmHg-1; P < 0.05). These effects of gastrin infusion were completely abolished by pretreatment with omeprazole. Symptom perception decreased during gastrin infusion and was more dependent on pressure and wall tension than on volume. In conclusion: gastrin may have a role in regulating proximal gastric mechanics by inducing fundic relaxation and increasing gastric wall compliance. The effect of gastrin is dependent on acid secretion.     

An experimental model for the study of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation and motor function of the proximal stomach in humans

A simple and reliable experimental model would be useful in human research on new drugs which target transient lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) relaxation. The aim was to investigate the effect of repeated distensions on the rate of transient LOS relaxation, LOS pressure and motor function of the proximal stomach. Twelve healthy subjects were studied with a multilumen manometric assembly incorporating a sleeve sensor for the LOS and a bag positioned in the proximal stomach and connected to a barostat. Intrabag volume was set at 75% of the threshold for gastric discomfort and maintained for two 30-min distension periods separated by a 45-min washout with the bag deflated. The studies lasted 145 +/- 2 min. The rate of transient LOS relaxations was similar during the two distensions, 3.5;2-4 vs 3;2.5-4 (median;interquartile range) and so was LOS pressure. Baseline intrabag pressure, as a measure of gastric tone, and the number of pressure waves, as a measure of phasic contractions, were also similar, 11.3;9.3-12.3 mmHg vs 10.8;9.3-12.5 mmHg and 16;13-28 mmHg vs 19;15-29 mmHg, respectively. Our model allows to perform 1-day studies which can assess two experimental conditions on transient LOS relaxations and motor function of the proximal stomach within an acceptable time span.     

Computer analysis of prolonged lower oesophageal sphincter pressure recordings

The aim of the study was to validate a recently developed computer program for the analysis of prolonged recordings of lower oesophageal sphincter pressure. Thirty 1-hour stretches were selected from sets of 24-h pressure signals recorded from the pharynx, oesophagus, lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) and stomach in 10 ambulant patients with gastrooesophageal reflux disease. Three experienced investigators visually analysed end-expiratory LOS pressures and transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs), using published criteria. A computer program was developed for calculation of an end-expiratory pressure curve and detection of TLOSRs using the same criteria. Although the results showed an maximum deviation from the mean of 11.1% and 14.8% for manually calculated LOS pressures and visually detected TLOSRs, respectively only 62.1% of the detected TLOSRs were detected by all three observers. LOS pressure as measured by the computer closely approximated the mean of the LOS pressures calculated by the three observers. Although the total number of TLOSRs was comparable to that assessed by visual analysis, the computer detected only 46% of the TLOSRs detected by each observer and 56.8% of the TLOSRs detected by all observers. It is concluded that automated calculation of end-expiratory LOS pressure is feasible and yields reliable results, whereas automated detection of TLOSRs could not be satisfactorily accomplished. Our study showed that improvement of computer algorithms for TLOSR detection is desirable. However, the previously described criteria for detection of TLOSRs are insufficiently precise; further refinement of these criteria will be necessary to reduce the large discrepancies between the outcome of detection of TLOSRs by computer and by humans, and to reduce the equally large discrepancies between the results of detection by different human observers.     

Influence of tegaserod on proximal gastric tone and on the perception of gastric distention in functional dyspepsia

Background Abnormalities in gastric sensorimotor function (hypersensitivity to distention and impaired meal accommodation) have been implicated in the pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia (FD). To study the effect of the 5‐HT₄ agonist tegaserod on sensitivity to gastric distention and gastric accommodation in FD. Methods Thirty FD patients (7 males, mean age 42 ± 2 years) underwent a gastric barostat study on two separate occasions, 2 weeks apart, after 5 days of pretreatment with placebo or tegaserod 6 mg b.i.d. in a double‐blind randomized order. After introduction of the barostat bag, graded isobaric distentions (2 mmHg increments/2 min) were performed to determine gastric compliance and sensitivity to distention. Subsequently, the pressure level was set at intra‐abdominal pressure [minimal distending pressure (MDP)] + 2 mmHg for 90 min, with administration of a liquid meal (200 mL; 300 kcal) after 30 min. Key Results Tegaserod had no influence on MDP (7.9 ± 0.4 vs 7.4 ± 0.4 mmHg) or fasting gastric compliance (44 ± 10 vs 61 ± 6 mL mmHg^?1) and on fasting thresholds for first perception (3.6 ± 0.4 vs 4.2 ± 0.2 mmHg above MDP) or discomfort (9.9 ± 0.7 vs 10.5 ± 0.5 mmHg above MDP). Tegaserod did not alter intra‐balloon volumes before and after the meal [respectively 146 ± 14 vs 120 ± 11 and 297 ± 28 vs 283 ± 29 mL, not significant (NS)], or the amplitude of the meal‐induced gastric relaxation (151 ± 23 vs 162 ± 23 mL, NS). In the subgroup with normal gastric emptying (n = 22), tegaserod significantly enhanced meal‐induced accommodation (126 ± 23 vs 175 ± 29 mL, anova P < 0.001). Conclusions & Inferences Tegaserod does not alter gastric sensorimotor function in FD patients as a group. In the subgroup with normal gastric emptying, tegaserod 6 mg b.i.d enhanced gastric accommodation.     

Effect of baclofen on oesophageal motility and transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations in GORD patients: a 48-h manometric study

Abstract  Little is known about prolonged effect of baclofen on oesophageal and lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) motility. We aimed at investigating the oesophageal motility in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) patients 24 h before and after the administration of multiple doses of baclofen. Twenty-one GORD patients underwent a 48-h manometry recording the swallows, the oesophageal and the LOS motility. During the second 24-h period, patients received baclofen 10 mg or placebo four times per day in a double-blind randomized fashion. Baclofen increased the LOS basal tone in comparison with baseline ( P  = 0.02), with a concomitant reduction in the number of transient LOS relaxations (TLOSRs) ( P  = 0.01). Moreover, baclofen induced a decrease of the swallows ( P  = 0.02) and of primary oesophageal body waves ( P  = 0.04) with no changes in the amplitude. Multiple doses of baclofen determine a reduction in the number of TLOSRs and an increase in the LOS tone throughout the 24 h. The concomitant decreased number of swallows and of primary peristalsis could depend on the well-known lower amount of reflux episodes induced by the drug. The potential therapeutic effect of baclofen could be expressed not only postprandially, but also in the fasting state when reflux episodes are present as well.     

Effect of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline on gastric sensitivity and compliance in healthy humans.

Abstract Visceral hypersensitivity may contribute to symptoms in functional dyspepsia. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may be beneficial in functional gastrointestinal disorders. The aim of this study was to determine whether the SSRI sertraline affects gastric sensitivity and compliance in healthy humans. Ten healthy humans completed a 6-week randomized, double-blind, crossover trial of sertraline (50 mg day(-1)) vs. placebo. After each 2-week treatment, fullness, pain and nausea were rated at increasing gastric barostat distending pressures. Sensation thresholds above minimal distending pressure (MDP) were determined with a tracking method. Somatic sensory testing was performed by hand immersion in ice water. No differences were found between sertraline and placebo for symptoms as a function of distending pressure (fullness, P = 0.72; pain, P = 0.79; nausea, P = 0.41), gastric compliance (P = 0.15), median and interquartile range thresholds for first sensation [4.1 (3.5-5.7) vs. 6.2 (3.3-10.0) mmHg above MDP, P = 0.19] and pain [15.2 (8.3-21.0) vs. 15.3 (10.3-19.8) mmHg above MDP, P = 0.85], and median tolerance times for hand ice water immersion [27 (19-99) vs. 29 (20-180) s, P = 0.73]. In conclusion, sertraline had no effect on gastric sensitivity or compliance, or somatic pain tolerance in healthy humans. Studies are needed to assess the effects of SSRIs on visceral sensation and clinical symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia.     

Influence of different intragastric stimuli on triggering of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation in the dog

Gastro-oesophageal reflux in the dog is mainly caused by transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR), the major stimulus for which is distension of the stomach. The possibility that liquid and/or acid sensors in the proximal stomach reduce the incidence and/or shorten the duration of TLOSR was addressed in the present study. Manometric recordings of the pharynx, oesophagus, lower oesophageal sphincter and stomach were made in awake dogs equipped with an oesophagostomy. TLOSRs were induced by insufflation of air or infusion of liquid nutrients with varying pH. Intragastric distension with air provoked TLOSRs with a significantly shorter duration than those seen after distension with liquid (4.3 +/- 0.5 vs 9.6 +/- 0.3 sec; P < 0.05). There were fewer TLOSRs at high intragastric pH (pH 5.0: 3.1 +/- 0.5/90 min) than at low pH (pH 1.5: 5.5 +/- 0.9/90 min, P < 0.05). Successfully propagated peristalsis following a TLOSR was more common after stimulation with liquid than with air. It can be concluded that there are H(+)-sensing mechanisms in the stomach which stimulate triggering of TLOSR. In addition, the reduced duration of TLOSR during air insufflation shows that the physical state of the distending stimulus can affect the patterning of TLOSR.     

Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation in achalasia: everything but LOS relaxation

Abstract  In conducting clinical high-resolution oesophageal pressure topography (HROPT) studies we observed that after subjects sat upright between series of supine and upright test swallows, they frequently had a transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR). When achalasia patients were studied in the same protocol, they exhibited a similar HROPT event leading to the hypothesis that achalasics had incomplete TLOSRs. We reviewed clinical HROPT studies of 94 consecutive non-achalasics and 25 achalasics. Studies were analyzed for a TLOSR-like event during the study and, when observed, that TLOSR-like event was characterized for the degree and duration of distal oesophageal shortening, the degree of LOS relaxation, associated crural diaphragm (CD) inhibition, oesophageal pressurization and upper oesophageal sphincter (UOS) relaxation. About 64/94 (68%) non-achalasics and 15/24 (63%) of achalasics had a pressure topography event after the posture change characterized by a prolonged period of distal oesophageal shortening and/or LOS relaxation. Events among the non-achalasics and achalasics were similar in terms of magnitude and duration of shortening and all were associated with CD inhibition. Similar proportions had associated non-deglutitive UOS relaxations. The only consistent differences were the absence of associated LOS relaxation and the absence of HROPT evidence of reflux among the achalasics leading us to conclude that their events were incomplete TLOSRs. Achalasic patients exhibit a selective defect in the TLOSR response suggesting preservation of all sensory, central and efferent aspects of the requisite neural substrate with the notable exception of LOS relaxation, a function of inhibitory (nitrergic) myenteric plexus neurons.     

Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations play an insignificant role in gastro-oesophageal reflux to the proximal oesophagus.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux to the proximal oesophagus may cause atypical symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). The motor abnormalities underlying reflux into the proximal oesophagus are still unclear. The aim of this study was to analyse the oesophageal motility during reflux into the proximal oesophagus in a group of healthy subjects and in patients with atypical symptoms of GORD. We concentrated particularly on lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) activity and transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs). Ten patients (7M, 3F, age 25-51 years) with mild oesophagitis (Savary-Miller grade I-II) and 10 healthy subjects (6M, 4F, age 23-54 years) underwent a 24-h dual pH-metric and manometric recording, using an electronic portable device. This recorded distal and proximal oesophageal pH values, oesophageal body and LOS motility. GORD patients had more distal and proximal reflux (DR and PR) compared with healthy controls (DR P < 0.001; PR P < 0.05). TLOSRs were the most frequent event during reflux into the distal oesophagus, whereas TLOSR frequency was much lower during reflux to the proximal oesophagus in GORD patients and in healthy controls (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 vs. distal reflux, respectively). A significant relationship between TLOSRs and distal refluxes was present but no relationship with proximal reflux was detected. We conclude that TLOSRs are much less frequent during reflux to the proximal oesophagus than distal oesophageal reflux in patients with mild GORD suffering from atypical manifestations. The mechanism of acid reflux to the proximal oesophagus is unclear.     

The lower oesophageal sphincter

Abstract  The lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) is a specialized segment of the circular muscle layer of the distal oesophagus, accounting for approximately 90% of the basal pressure at the oesophago-gastric junction. Together with the crural diaphragm, it functions as an antireflux barrier protecting the oesophagus from the caustic gastric content. During swallowing or belching, the LOS muscle must relax briefly in order to allow passage of food or intragastric air. These swallow-induced and prolonged transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs) respectively result from activation of the inhibitory motor innervation of the sphincter. Both in man and animals, the main neurotransmitter released by the inhibitory neurones is nitric oxide. The two typical examples of dysfunction of the LOS are achalasia and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Achalasia is characterized by reduction or even absence of the inhibitory innervation to the LOS, leading to impaired LOS relaxation with dysphagia and stasis of food in the oesophagus. On the contrary, GORD results from failure of the antireflux barrier, with increased exposure of the oesophagus to gastric acid. This leads to symptoms such as heartburn and regurgitation, and in more severe cases to oesophagitis, Barrett's oesophagus and even carcinoma. To date, TLOSRs are recognized as the main underlying mechanism, and may represent an important target for treatment. More insight in the pathogenesis of both diseases will undoubtedly lead to new treatments in the near future.     

Lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation evoked by stimulation of the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus in ferrets.

An understanding of the neural control of lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) relaxation is clinically relevant because transient LOS relaxations (TLOSRs) are a mechanism of acid reflux into the oesophagus. Preganglionic motor neurones innervating the LOS are localized in the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMV). Based on a single study in cats, it is now widely accepted that these neurones are functionally organized into two separate populations, such that stimulation of the caudal and rostral DMV evokes LOS relaxation and contraction, respectively. Our goal was to map the functional LOS responses to chemical stimulation in the DMV and nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) of ferrets, an animal model commonly used for conscious studies on TLOSRs, and to test whether DMV-evoked LOS relaxation is mediated through hexamethonium-sensitive vagal-inhibitory pathways to the LOS. We used miniaturized manometry with Dentsleeve to monitor LOS and oesophageal pressures in decerebrate unanaesthetized ferrets. LOS relaxation was evoked readily in response to gastric insufflation, which shows that the vago-vagal reflex was intact in this preparation. Microinjections of l-glutamate (12.5 nmol L-1 in 25 nL) were made into the DMV from approximately - 1.5 to + 2.0 mm relative to the obex. Microinjections into the caudal (- 1.5 to + 0.0 mm behind obex) and intermediate (+ 0.1 to + 1.0 mm rostral to obex) DMV both significantly decreased LOS pressure, and complete LOS relaxation was noted in 28/32 and 11/18 cases, respectively. LOS relaxation responses to DMV microinjection were highly reproducible and abolished by bilateral vagotomy or hexamethonium (15 mg kg-1 intravenously). A nitric oxide synthase inhibitor (l-NAME 100 mg kg-1 intramuscularly) significantly increased the time taken to reach the maximal response. Increases in LOS pressure (24 +/- 4 mmHg; n = 3) were obtained only when stimulation sites were located equal to greater than 1.5 mm rostral to the obex. LOS relaxation (- 78 +/- 10%; n = 6) was evoked by stimulation of the NTS but not immediately outside of the NTS (11 +/- 27%; n = 5). We conclude that there is a very extensive population of 'inhibitory' motor neurones in the DMV that may account for the predominant vagal-inhibitory tone in ferrets. As NTS stimulation evokes LOS relaxation and the predominant response to DMV stimulation is also LOS relaxation, this vago-vagal reflex may involve an excitatory interneurone between the NTS and DMV vagal inhibitory output.     

Relationship between the mechanism of gastro-oesophageal reflux and oesophageal acid exposure in patients with reflux disease

Abstract  This study investigated the relationship between the oesophageal acid exposure time and the underlying manometric motor events in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). In 31 patients, 3-hour oesophageal motility and pH were measured after a test meal. Ten patients underwent 24-hour ambulatory manometry and pH recording. In the 3-hour postprandial study, of 367 reflux episodes 79% was associated with a transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR), 14% with absent basal lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure and the remaining 7% with other mechanisms, representing 62, 28 and 10% of the acid exposure time, respectively. Acid reflux duration per motor mechanism was longer for absent basal LOS pressure than for TLOSR (189 ± 23 s and 41 ± 5 s, respectively, P  < 0.001). In the 24-hour ambulatory study, the contribution of TLOSRs to reflux frequency vs acid exposure time were 65 vs 54% interprandially and 74 vs 53% after the meal. During the night, absence of basal LOS pressure accounted for 36% of reflux events representing 71% of acid exposure time. In conclusion, the duration of oesophageal acid exposure following a TLOSR is shorter than reflux during absent basal LOS pressure. TLOSRs are, the major contributor to oesophageal acid exposure during the day. At night, however, reflux during absent basal LOS pressure is the major contributor to acid exposure.     

Gastric hypersensitivity induced by oesophageal acid infusion in healthy volunteers

Abstract  Distal oesophageal acid exposure has been shown to increase visceral sensitivity of the proximal oesophagus via central sensitization. Here we evaluated whether acidification of the distal oesophagus also affects the sensorimotor function of the proximal stomach. A gastric barostat study combined with a 30-min acid (HCl 0.15 mol L⁻¹) or saline infusion in the distal oesophagus was performed in 18 healthy volunteers. Gastric and cutaneous sensitivity was assessed before and up to 2 h after the start of infusion. Directly after acid infusion, but not after saline, the threshold for discomfort decreased (–6.4 ± 1.7 vs 0.4 ± 0.4 mmHg; P = 0.028) and distension-induced symptoms increased significantly compared with the baseline (122 ± 49% vs −3 ± 9%). Cutaneous sensitivity remained unaffected by acid infusion. In contrast, when the infused liquid was aspirated 3 cm more distally, at the level of the lower oesophageal sphincter, the effect of acid infusion on gastric sensitivity was abolished and the increase in distension-induced symptoms was reduced (61 ± 24%). Distal oesophageal acid infusion induces visceral hypersensitivity without affecting somatic sensitivity arguing against a similar mechanism of central sensitization as observed in non-cardiac chest pain. As reduction of the acid load to the stomach prevented this effect, our findings indicate that either gastric and/or duodenal acidification is involved. It should be emphasized though that aspiration from distal oesophagus may have attenuated the effect by reducing the acid-exposed area or by reducing the contact time.     

Mechanisms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in the ferret

Transient lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) relaxation is the major mechanism of gastro-oesophageal reflux in humans – an event unassociated with swallowing. Mechanisms involved in triggering transient LOS relaxation are poorly understood, and their further study requires a small animal model. In this study we aimed to establish methods for prolonged ambulant oesophageal manometry in ferrets, and to determine motor events associated with reflux episodes and their triggering by different gastric nutrient loads. Forty-two studies were performed on nine ferrets with chronic cervical oesophagostomies, through which a manometric assembly was introduced and secured to a collar, which incorporated a microphone for detection of swallows. The assembly included a gastric feeding channel, one gastric and four oesophageal manometric sideholes, a 2.5-cm-long LOS sleeve sensor, and an oesophageal pH electrode. Intragastric infusions were given over 2 min, the first after a 30-min control recording period, and in 29/42 studies, a second infusion was given 60 min later. Infusions were either 25 mL 10% dextrose solution, pH 3.5 (22 studies), 25 mL triglyceride emulsion (Intralipid) pH 3.5 (11 studies), or 25 mL air (nine studies). Episodes of oesophageal acidification were absent before gastric infusions. After infusion, 2.1 ± 0.2 episodes occurred over the first 30 min. After glucose infusion, 15/18 acidification episodes (83%) occurred during transient LOS relaxation, and 3/18 (17%) occurred after gradual (< 1 mmHg sec⁻¹) downward drifts in basal LOSP to < 2 mmHg. After lipid infusion two acidification episodes occurred, both during transient LOS relaxation. Mean duration of transient LOS relaxation was 8.0 ± 0.4 sec. All infusions increased occurrence of transient LOS relaxation to a similar extent, each of which ended with primary peristalsis. We conclude that gastric infusion of glucose, lipid and gas are all effective in provoking gastro-oesophageal reflux in ferrets. Reflux occurs through similar mechanisms to those seen in humans, i.e. increased triggering of transient LOS relaxation. The conscious ferret is therefore an appropriate model for future studies of manipulation of mechanisms giving rise to gastro-oesophageal reflux.     

Reproducibility of meal-induced transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

AIM: To calculate the number of subjects required in trials investigating drugs reducing the number of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs), the inter- and intra-individual variability of TLOSRs were determined, using meal ingestion as a trigger of TLOSRs and reflux. METHODS: A total of 23 gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) patients with no to grade B oesophagitis and a hiatal hernia < or =3 cm underwent oesophageal manometry and pHmetry 1 h before and 3 h after ingestion of a solid meal on two separate days approximately 4 weeks apart. Reflux episodes and the underlying mechanisms and the number of TLOSRs were evaluated. RESULTS: The number of TLOSRs, reflux episodes and % time with pH < 4 after meal ingestion did not differ significantly between the two sessions. The intra-individual variation of TLOSRs in the 3 h postprandial period (24.4) was smaller compared with the inter-individual variation (47.5). Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations were the predominant cause of reflux accounting for 61 +/- 7 and 70 +/- 5% of the reflux episodes in visits 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data for the first time provide information on the variability of TLOSRs and reflux evoked by meal ingestion, which is of crucial importance for the design and power calculations of future clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of new drugs targeting TLOSRs.     

Mechanisms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in the lateral decubitus positions

Gastro-oesophageal reflux is more common in the right than in the left lateral position but the reasons why are not well understood. We have therefore studied the mechanisms underlying reflux in the lateral decubitus positions in patients with reflux disease. Fifteen patients with symptomatic reflux and excessive oesophageal acid exposure were studied (nine male, age 25-63 years). Each was intubated with a perfused manometric assembly, incorporating a Dent sleeve, and a pH probe. Following a 30-min basal period, a 400-kCal meal was infused into the stomach and patients were studied for 60 min in each lateral position. Following infusion of the meal, lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure fell and transient LOS relaxation (TLOSR) frequency increased. Acid reflux episodes were more common in the postprandial period (fasting 0 (0-6) h, first postprandial hour 1 (0-9) h, P = 0.0002, second postprandial hour 1 (0-22) h, P = 0.02) and occurred more than twice as often in the right lateral position (right 3 (0-22) h, left 0 (0-10) h, P = 0.01). However, TLOSRs, swallow-related relaxations and low basal LOS pressures were equally common in both lateral positions. In patients with reflux disease, postprandial reflux is twice as common in the right lateral position. This does not relate to differences in gastro-oesophageal junctional pressure, suggesting that other aspects of barrier function or differences in the intragastric distribution of chyme may be important.     

Gastro-oesophageal reflux of liquids and gas during transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations

Some transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs) are accompanied by gastro-oesophageal reflux and others are not. We aimed to investigate what factors determine the occurrence and type of reflux during TLOSRs. In 12 healthy subjects prolonged high-resolution manometry was performed. Reflux was detected using pH-impedance monitoring. A total of 219 TLOSRs were detected; no differences were observed between the duration of TLOSRs with liquid-containing reflux (20.2 +/- 1.0 s), gas reflux (17.0 +/- 1.0 s) and no reflux (19.0 +/- 1.0 s). Trans-sphincteric pressure gradient was similar in TLOSRs with liquid reflux (1.6 +/- 0.1 kPa), gas reflux (1.5 +/- 0.1 kPa) and no reflux (1.7 +/- 0.3 kPa). Prevalence, duration and amplitude of oesophageal pre-contractions and sphincteric after-contractions were not different for TLOSRs with and without reflux. The total number of TLOSRs decreased significantly from 8.2 +/- 0.8 in the first to 5.7 +/- 0.5 in the second and 4.4 +/- 0.6 in the third 70-min recording period. The number of TLOSRs accompanied by liquid-containing reflux decreased from 4.7 +/- 0.9 to 3.0 +/- 0.4 to 1.6 +/- 0.4, while the numbers of TLOSRs with gas reflux remained unchanged (2.1 +/- 0.6-2.1 +/- 0.7-2.2 +/- 0.6). Besides, time after the meal, no differences were observed in the characteristics of TLOSRs with and without gastro-oesophageal reflux. We conclude that factors, other than TLOSR characteristics, are important of whether or not a TLOSR is reflux-related.     

Influence of caloric labyrinthine stimulation on oesophageal motor function

There is incomplete understanding of the factors regulating smooth muscle primary peristalsis and of the reflux-associated transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations which are under postural control and which occur independently of swallowing. We examined the effects of labyrinthine stimulation on basal lower oesophageal sphincter tone, the frequency of non-swallow associated lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation and on the amplitude of primary peristalsis in the distal oesophagus. In 13 healthy volunteers, labyrinthine stimulation was produced by infusion of water at 10°C into the external auditory canal for 5 minutes, or until nausea ensued. A manometric sleeve catheter assembly monitored lower oesophageal sphincter pressure while side holes recorded pharyngeal, mid and lower oesophageal, and gastric pressures. Recordings were made during labyrinthine stimulation and during matched control periods. Caloric stimulation caused a minor but significant fall in mean basal lower oesophageal sphincter pressure of 14% (P = 0.04) and had no detectable effect on oesophageal peristalsis. In association with vomiting induced by labyrinthine stimulation in 3 subjects, lower oesophageal sphincter pressure fell rapidly by 61% (P = 0.03) from control levels and this inhibition persisted for up to 20 minutes after vomiting. For 10 minutes post-emesis, primary peristaltic amplitude was reduced by 50% (P < 0.001). Swallowing triggered a completely propagated peristaltic wave significantly less often during the post-emetic period. The rate of occurrence of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations was not influenced significantly by labyrinthine stimulation. These findings are consistent with a functionally important role for the brainstem in the control of motor function of the smooth muscle oesophagus but do not permit distinction of a direct effect from a secondary humoral effect as part of the vomiting reflex.     

Distinct patterns of oesophageal shortening during primary peristalsis, secondary peristalsis and transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation

This study characterized oesophageal shortening during secondary peristalsis and transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR) in an attempt to determine its contribution to the opening mechanism. Eight healthy subjects (four males, 26 +/- 1 years) had metal clips affixed at 0, +3, and +8 cm relative to the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ), defining two distal oesophageal segments. Axial clip movement was assessed with concurrent videofluoroscopy and manometry during primary peristalsis, secondary peristalsis and TLOSR. Clip-defined oesophageal segment length change was measured at 0.5-s intervals. The magnitude of the most distal segment shortening was least with TLOSR, greatest with primary peristalsis and intermediate with secondary peristalsis. Conversely, maximal overall oesophageal shortening during TLOSR, evidenced by SCJ movement, was similar to that during primary peristalsis. In 3/12 TLOSRs, the moment of LOS opening and gas reflux was optimally imaged; SCJ excursion was 0.3 +/- 0.1 cm prior to LOS opening and 1.4 +/- 0.7 cm immediately after gas reflux. The segmental pattern of oesophageal shortening was distinct during primary peristalsis, secondary peristalsis and TLOSR. During TLOSR, significant elevation of the SCJ occurred only after LOS opening, suggesting that this was a consequence of oesophageal distension induced by gas reflux rather than a component of the opening mechanism.