RESPONSES TO ANALOGUES OF GROWTH HORMONE-RELEASING HORMONE IN NORMAL SUBJECTS, AND IN GROWTH-HORMONE DEFICIENT CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS

Three analogues of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) have been compared in normal subjects. GHRH(1-29)NH2 is equipotent to GHRH(1-40); increasing doses from 10-200 micrograms per subject augments the duration of stimulated growth hormone (GH) release, but the peak serum GH shows only a poor correlation with dose. The derivative D-Ala2-GHRH(1-29)NH2 is no more potent than the unsubstituted GHRH(1-29)NH2. In 20 children and young adults with growth hormone deficiency by conventional criteria, eight showed normal or only slightly subnormal peak serum GH responses to GHRH(1-40) or GHRH(1-29)NH2. These included two patients with tumours of the hypothalamus, as well as six with idiopathic isolated growth hormone deficiency or panhypopituitarism. A poor response to GHRH was generally seen in patients on long-term GH therapy. Priming with GHRH, in either a single bolus or a continuous infusion, did not increase the GH response to GHRH. It is concluded that GHRH(1-29)NH2 is a useful analogue in the testing of GH reserve in patients with growth hormone deficiency, and has considerable potential for long-term therapy.     

GH responses to intravenous bolus infusions of GH releasing hormone and GH releasing peptide 2 separately and in combination in adult volunteers

OBJECTIVE Synthetic growth hormone releasing peptides (GHRP) have potent GH-releasing activity in vivo and in vitro. The nature of the Interaction of GHRP and naturally occurring GH releasing hormone (GHRH) is still far from clear. We investigated GH release in response to individual peptide doses or combined doses of GHRH1–29NH₂ and GHRP-2, a novel GH-releasing peptide, in normal adults. DESIGN Subjects underwent three tests in a randomized order: (1) i.v. bolus of GHRH1-29NH₂ (1 μg/kg BW), (2) i.v. bolus of GHRP-2 (1 μg/kg BW), (3) i.v. bolus of GHRH1-29NH ₂ combined with GHRP-2 (same dosages). SUBJECTS Eight healthy non-obese male volunteers, aged 25–34 years. MEASUREMENTS Serum GH concentrations were measured by IRMA at ?15,0, + 10, 20,30,45,60,75,90 and120 minutes after the boluses. RESULTS Peak GH levels in response to GHRH1-29NH ₂, GHRP-2 and the combined GHRH1-29NH ₂ and GHRP-2 administrations were observed between 20 and 45 minutes. Peak GH levels at30 minutes were 32.8 ± 27.3 (mean ± SD), 109.7 ± 56.1 and 140.9 ± 80.6mU/l, respectively. The area under the curve for GH levels (GH AUC) calculated for the first 90 minutes after the GHRH1-29NH ₂ test (2061.2 ± 1601.9mU/1 min) was significantly lower than those after GHRP-2 (6205.1 ± 3216.9mU/l min) and the combined GHRH1-29NH ₂ and GHRP-2 challenge (9788.3 ± 5530.4mU/l min) (P = 0.0003 and P = 0.00005, respectively; palred Student's t-test for log transformed data). Although the GH AUC of the GHRP-2 test and the combined GHRHl-29NH ₂ and GHRP-2 test differed significantly (P = 0.016, t-test), the latter was not signlflcantly dlfferent from the sum of the GH AUCs of each subject after the separate tests. CONCLUSION Although the GH releasing potency of GHRP-2 significantly exceeded that of GHRH1-29NH ₂, we were not able to demonstrate synergy between the two substances. It is possible that GHRP-2 given in our study in higher molar quantities than GHRH1-29NH ₂ masked the effect of the latter.     

Dopaminergic and cholinergic influences on the growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in man

It is well established that compounds that modify dopaminergic and cholinergic activity in man may induce changes in circulating growth hormone (GH). We have, therefore, investigated the effect of a dopamine agonist, bromocriptine, and a dopamine antagonist, domperidone, as well as a muscarinic cholinergic antagonist, pirenzepine, on the GH response to an analogue of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in normal male subjects. GHRH(1-29)NH2 induced a rise in serum GH that was augmented by bromocriptine, antagonized by pirenzepine, but was unaltered by domperidone. As this dose of GHRH(1-29) NH2 has been shown to be maximally stimulatory to GH release, it is suggested that there are dopamine stimulatory and cholinergic inhibitory receptors to GH release independent of GHRH in man.     

The GH response to low-dose bolus growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH(1-29)NH2) is attenuated in patients with longstanding post-irradiation GH insufficiency

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have suggested that post-irradiation GH insufficiency results from a loss of GHRH secretion, since many patients were able to release GH following exogenous GHRH stimulation. However, supramaximal doses of GHRH were used and the response may decline with time after radiotherapy. We re-evaluated the GHRH dose-response curve in patients post cranial irradiation and in controls. DESIGN: Randomized controlled study. METHODS: Five adult male long-term survivors of childhood brain tumours (median age 21.8 years (18.4-26.7); 13.7 years (11.4-15.7) post-radiotherapy, >30Gy) and five matched controls were studied. An intravenous bolus of GHRH(1-29)NH(2) was administered in doses at the lower (0.05 microg/kg) and upper (0.15 microg/kg) range of the dose-response curves for young males, as well as the standard supramaximal dose (1. 0 microg/kg). GH was measured before stimulation, every 2min for the first hour and every 5min for the second hour. All studies were conducted in a random fashion. RESULTS: Significantly lower peak and area under the curve (AUC) GH concentrations occurred in the irradiated group using 0.15 microg/kg (median peak Irradiated, 4. 5mU/l vs median Controls, 37.4mU/l; P<0.01) and 1.0 microg/kg (median peak Irradiated, 4.8mU/l vs median Controls, 15.2mU/l; P<0. 05) GHRH(1-29)NH(2). In irradiated subjects there was an incremental rise in GH output with increasing doses of GHRH(1-29)NH(2 )(median AUC: 122mU/l.min vs 179mU/l.min vs 268mU/l.min; P=0.007) reflecting altered pituitary sensitivity and reduced responsiveness. CONCLUSION: The GH response to bolus GHRH(1-29)NH(2) is attenuated in adult long-term survivors of childhood brain tumours. This may reflect direct pituitary damage and/or the loss of the tropic effects of chronic GHRH deficiency.     

SUBCUTANEOUS GROWTH HORMONE-RELEASING HORMONE AUGMENTS PULSATILE NOCTURNAL GH RELEASE IN GH-INSUFFICIENT CHILDREN, BUT MAY ALSO RAISE BASAL GH SECRETION

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) when given s.c. to GH-insufficient children either as pulses, or once or twice daily, promotes linear growth. These treatment regimens, however, are not ideal as they require frequent drug administration and a significant proportion of patients do not show improved growth. We have now investigated the GH response to a nocturnal s.c. infusion of GHRH (1-29)NH2, at two dosages, 5 and 10 micrograms/kg/h, in a group of five GH-insufficient children. The s.c. infusion of GHRH between 2100 h and 0600 h augmented nocturnal pulsatile GH release in all five children. There was a dose-dependent response for the GH area under the curve (AUC), and mean total GH concentration. The AUC for GH was significantly greater after the 10 than 5 micrograms/kg/h GHRH which in turn was greater than that after placebo; mean (SD) AUC: 14816 (3978), 8125 (1931), 3032 (1582) mU min/l respectively (P less than 0.01 and P less than 0.05). There was no significant change in the number of GH pulses during the 9-h infusions when the subjects were infused with GHRH 10 or 5 micrograms/kg/h compared to placebo, and they occurred at similar times although the number of pulses tended to be greater after GHRH; the mean (SD) numbers of GH pulses were 5.0 (0.7), 3.8 (0.8), 3.2 (0.8), respectively. There was however a significant rise in the mean baseline GH concentration in all patients during the infusion of GHRH 10 micrograms/kg/h compared to placebo, but not with 5 micrograms/kg/h. Thus, GHRH(1-29)NH2 given s.c. augmented nocturnal pulsatile GH release in GH-insufficient children but it also increased baseline GH secretion. These results suggest that a sustained release preparation of GHRH could be a potential treatment for GH-insufficient children, and that a dose of 5 micrograms/kg/h would promote pulsatile GH release, but that at higher dosage it may also raise basal GH secretion.     

Growth hormone (GH) response to a single intravenous injection of synthetic GH-releasing hormone in prepubertal children with growth failure

In this collaborative study involving 27 European medical centers, the plasma GH response to a single iv bolus dose of 2 micrograms/kg BW synthetic GHRH-(1-44)NH2 was determined in 574 children with growth failure of various etiologies. Analysis of the plasma GH response to GHRH was performed in 394 validated prepubertal children; these children were subdivided into 3 groups according to the degree of GH deficiency assessed within 6 months by conventional provocative tests (insulin, arginine, etc.): normal GH status (n = 210), partial GH deficiency (n = 73), or severe GH deficiency (n = 111). The mean peak GH values (+/- 2 SEM) after GHRH treatment in the three groups were 45.8 +/- 4.8, 29.2 +/- 6.3, and 16.8 +/- 3.1 microU/mL, respectively, and were greater than those after the conventional tests. The GH responses were consistent with the degree of GH deficiency based on the responses to the conventional tests. In addition, the areas under the GH response curves in the three groups were significantly different (P less than 0.0001). Among children with severe idiopathic GH deficiency 77% had a peak plasma GH level after GHRH above 10.0 microU/mL and 39% had a peak GH above 20.0 microU/mL. In these children, a single GHRH injection provides information on both their GH secretory capacity and the putative supresellar etiology of their GH deficiency, and may be of potential therapeutic value.     

CONTINUOUS SUBCUTANEOUS GHRH(1-29)NH2 PROMOTES GROWTH OVER 1 YEAR IN SHORT, SLOWLY GROWING CHILDREN

We have treated eight pre-pubertal children with partial GH insufficiency with continuous subcutaneous infusions of GHRH(1-29)NH2 at a dose of 60 ng/kg/min for periods of up to 1 year. In five children treated for 1 year, mean growth velocity increased from 4.6 cm/year (range 4.4-5.2) to 7.0 cm/year (5.7-8.7) (P = 0.04). Three children treated for 3-6 months showed similar height velocity increases. A return to pretreatment growth rates was seen after cessation of treatment in all children. Twenty-four-hour GH profiles performed at intervals of 3 months showed sustained augmentation of pulsatile GH secretion without evidence of desensitization. The presence of pulsatile GH secretion during continuous GHRH administration provides strong evidence in man for the role of somatostatin in determining GH pulse frequency. The ability of the pituitary to respond to a supramaximal bolus of GHRH remained constant during the treatment. Continuous administration of GHRH(1-29)NH2 will become a practicable treatment when formulated into a sustained release or depot preparation. We have shown this to be an effective therapy for some short, slowly growing children. Further studies are required to establish the optimal dosage regimen.     

THE INTERACTION OF GROWTH HORMONE RELEASING HORMONE WITH OTHER HYPOTHALAMIC HORMONES ON THE RELEASE OF ANTERIOR PITUITARY HORMONES

To determine whether the 29 amino-acid fragment of growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) can be combined with other hypothalamic releasing hormones in a single test of anterior pituitary reserve, the responses of anterior pituitary hormones to combinations of an i.v. bolus of GHRH(1-29)NH2 or saline with an i.v. bolus of either LH releasing hormone (LHRH) plus TRH, ovine CRH(oCRH) or saline were studied. Each infusion of GHRH(1-29)NH2 resulted in a rapid increment of the plasma GH value. Infusion of GHRH(1-29)NH2 also caused a small and transient rise in plasma PRL, but no change in the integrated PRL response. The combination of GHRH(1-29)NH2 with LHRH plus TRH caused a larger increment of peak and integrated plasma TSH levels than LHRH plus TRH alone. GHRH(1-29)NH2 did not affect the release of other anterior pituitary hormones after infusion with oCRH or LHRH plus TRH. Because of the finding of potentiation of the TSH-releasing activity of LHRH plus TRH by GHRH(1-29)NH2, the study was extended to the investigation of TSH release after infusion of TRH in combination with either GHRH(1-29)NH2 or GHRH(1-40). In this study the combination of TRH with both GHRH preparations also caused a larger increment of the peak and integrated plasma TSH levels than TRH alone. It is concluded that GHRH(1-29)NH2 possesses moderate PRL-releasing activity apart from GH-releasing activity. In addition, GHRH potentiates the TSH-releasing activity of TRH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Long term pulsatile growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone therapy in children with GH deficiency

We treated seven GH-deficient children with 3-hourly 1 microgram/kg sc pulses of GHRH-(1-44) for 6 months and 2 micrograms/kg.pulse for another 6 months. Four patients had a serum GH response to iv GHRH before treatment, and an additional patient responded to iv GHRH after 1 month of pulsatile sc GHRH administration. The mean cumulative growth velocity increased from a pretreatment mean of 2.7 +/- 0.2 (+/- SE) to 8.4 +/- 2.5 and 5.4 +/- 0.7 cm/yr after 2 months and 1 yr of treatment, respectively. Low dose pulsatile GHRH therapy was effective in promoting growth in five of seven children, with height gain ranging from 4.4-7.5 cm at the end of 1 yr's therapy. Only one of the two patients who did not respond to GHRH had an improvement in linear growth when they were subsequently treated with synthetic GH. The other patient, a 16.5-yr-old pubertal girl who had both satisfactory GH and somatomedin-C responses during GHRH therapy, did not respond to either GHRH or, later, synthetic GH. The pretreatment serum GH response to iv GHRH, the serum somatomedin-C concentrations, and the peak serum GH response during sc GHRH therapy were not reliable predictors of clinical response.     

Effects of exogenous growth hormone pretreatment on the pituitary growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone alone or in combination with pyridostigmine in type I diabetic patients.

We evaluated the effects of iv pretreatment with exogenous GH on the GH response to GHRH either alone or in combination with pyridostigmine in 14 Type I diabetic patients and 6 normal subjects. All the subjects received an iv bolus injection of biosynthetic human GH, 2 IU; 2 h later they received either a. pyridostigmine, 120 mg orally, or b. placebo, 2 tablets orally, followed 1 h later by iv injection of GHRH(1-29) NH2, 100 micrograms. In normal subjects the median GH peak after GH+ GHRH was 1.8, range 1.2-6.9 micrograms/l. Pyridostigmine enhanced the GH response to GHRH in all subjects. The median GH peak after pyridostigmine + GH + GHRH was 32.7, range 19.8-42.1 micrograms/l (p less than 0.001 vs GHRH alone). Seven diabetic subjects had median GH peaks after GH + GHRH greater than 6.9 micrograms/l (the maximum GH peak after GH + GHRH in normal subjects) (group A: median GH peak 35.7, range 21.7-55 micrograms/l). The other diabetic subjects had GH peak lower than 6.9 micrograms/l (group B: median GH peak 4.4, range 2.1-6.5 micrograms/l). Pyridostigmine significantly increased the GH response to GHRH in group B patients (median GH peak 29.3, range 15.7-93.4 micrograms/l, p less than 0.001 vs GH + GHRH alone), but not in group A patients (median GH peak 39.9, range 21.9-64.9 micrograms/l). Group A diabetic patients were younger and had higher HbA1c and blood glucose levels than group B patients. In those diabetic patients with an exaggerated GH response to GH + GHRH, pyridostigmine failed to cause the increase in GH secretion observed in diabetic and control subjects with no responses to GH + GHRH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

GH FEEDBACK OCCURS THROUGH MODULATION OF HYPOTHALAMIC SOMATOSTATIN UNDER CHOLINERGIC CONTROL: STUDIES WITH PYRIDOSTIGMINE AND GHRH

We have studied the effect of increased cholinergic tone on the GH response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and on GH feedback, using pyridostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. In six healthy male adult volunteers 120 mg oral pyridostigmine increased basal GH secretion compared to placebo and augmented the GH response to 100 micrograms i.v. GHRH (1-29) NH2; the effect was more than the additive effect of pyridostigmine and GHRH when each was given alone. Pretreatment with 2 IU methionyl-hGH given i.v. abolished the serum GH response to GHRH given 3 h later, demonstrating a negative feedback loop of GH on the response to GHRH; this inhibited response to GHRH was restored in subjects given pyridostigmine as well as methionyl-hGH. The data demonstrate that enhanced cholinergic tone releases GH, augments the serum GH response to GHRH and unblocks the negative feedback effect of methionyl-hGH pretreatment on the GH response to GHRH. These results suggest that GH negative feedback effects on its own secretion occur predominantly through increased hypothalamic somatostatin secretion; this somatostatin secretion is under inhibitory cholinergic control.     

The effect of atenolol on the growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in obese children.

We have evaluated the effect of acute administration of atenolol, a selective beta-adrenergic antagonist, on the GH response to GHRH in nine obese children and in eight age-matched controls. The GH response to GHRH (1-29, 1 microgram/kg iv), evaluated both as the GH peak and as integrated area under the curve, was significantly lower in the obese children than in the controls. Pretreatment with atenolol (50 or 100 mg orally in subjects with body weight less than or greater than 40 kg, respectively, administered 120 min before the GHRH injection) significantly increased the GH response to GHRH in the obese subjects, such that their mean peak GH levels and mean integrated area under the curve after atenolol plus GHRH were similar to those of the control children after GHRH. Also in control children, atenolol caused a significant augmentation of the GH response to GHRH. Mean peak GH levels and mean integrated area under the curve after atenolol plus GHRH were significantly higher in the controls than in the obese children given the same treatment. These data show that inhibition of central beta-adrenergic receptors counteracts the blunted GH response to GHRH present in the obese children. In view of the alleged mechanism of action of beta-adrenergic blockade (inhibition of endogenous SRIH release), our data suggest that the somatostatinergic system is intact in obesity, and that the suppressed GH secretion is due to other causes.     

EFFECTS OF CALCITONIN ON GH RESPONSE TO PYRIDOSTIGMINE IN COMBINATION WITH hGHRH (1–29) NH2 IN NORMAL ADULT SUBJECTS

Studies in man demonstrated that salmon calcitonin (sCT) administration blunts the pituitary GH response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). However, the mechanisms underlying this inhibitory action of CT in man are unclear. Pyridostigmine (PD), an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, is hypothesized to enhance the GH response to GHRH in normal subjects probably via a decrease in the somatostatinergic tone. The aim of the present study was to investigate the mechanism of the inhibitory action of sCT on the GH response to human GHRH (1-29) NH2 by concomitant PD administration in normal humans. The GH response to GHRH was significantly suppressed by prior administration of sCT. Pretreatment of subjects with PD significantly enhanced the GH response to GHRH but did not alter the inhibitory actions of sCT. We conclude that sCT is able to inhibit GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in man without influencing the hypothalamic somatostatinergic tone.     

Acute effects of cortisone acetate on growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in normal adult subjects

Glucocorticoids have been shown to inhibit GH secretion in normal man when administered in large amounts for several days. The aim of our study was 1. to investigate the acute effects of a single dose of glucocorticoids on GH secretion in normal man; 2. to look at the relationship between the increase in serum cortisol concentration and GH response to the stimuli. Six healthy volunteers received on three occasions in random order an iv injection of GHRH (1-29) NH2, 100 micrograms, alone or 60 min after oral administration of either 25 or 50 mg of cortisone acetate. Mean stimulated GH levels, GH peak and integrated GH concentration were significantly lower after GHRH plus cortisone 25 mg than after GHRH alone. Mean GH levels at 15 and 30 min after GHRH injection and the peak GH level showed a further decrease after GHRH plus cortisone 50 mg. We conclude that acute administration of pharmacological doses of glucocorticoids is able to inhibit GH response to GHRH, probably through enhancement of endogenous somatostatin release. Moreover, this pharmacological effect of glucocorticoids seems to be dose-dependent and thus directly related to serum cortisol concentrations.     

Impaired growth hormone (GH) response to pyridostigmine in type 1 diabetic patients with exaggerated GH-releasing hormone-stimulated GH secretion

In the present study we investigated the effects of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor pyridostigmine (PD), which is hypothesized to decrease hypothalamic somatostatin tone, alone and in association with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) on GH secretion in 18 type 1 diabetic patients and 12 normal subjects using a randomized double blind placebo-controlled protocol. All subjects received either 120 mg oral PD or placebo 60 min before iv injection of either human GHRH-(1-29) NH2 (100 micrograms) or sterile water (2 mL). In normal subjects both PD alone and GHRH alone caused a significant increase in GH. PD and GHRH acted in a synergistic fashion when combined. In diabetic patients the GH response to GHRH was variable. To segregate the responses, the ratio between the GH increase after GHRH plus PD and after GHRH alone was calculated for each subject. In 10 diabetic patients (group A) the ratio was lower than 2 SD (P less than 0.05) from the mean response of normal subjects. These patients showed an exaggerated GH increase after GHRH and a lower GH increase after PD with respect to normal subjects. Eight diabetic patients (group B) showed a ratio similar to that in normal subjects and similar GH responses to the stimuli. No significant differences were found between groups A and B with respect to age, body mass index, and blood glucose levels. Duration of diabetes was longer and basal GH levels were higher in group A. Hemoglobin-A1c was higher in group A, but of only borderline statistical significance (P = 0.052). Our data demonstrate that in diabetic patients with exaggerated GH responses to GHRH an increase in cholinergic tone does not affect GH secretion. These data suggest that in some type 1 diabetic patients an altered somatostatinergic control of GH secretion may contribute to their abnormal GH response to GHRH.     

THE EFFECT OF GALANIN ON BASELINE AND GHRH-INDUCED GROWTH HORMONE SECRETION IN OBESE CHILDREN

We have evaluated the effect of the administration of galanin (Gal), a newly identified hypothalamic peptide, on baseline and GHRH-induced GH rise in five obese children and in seven controls. The GH response to GHRH (hpGRF(1-29), 1 microgram/kg i.v.), and to Gal (15 micrograms/kg/h for 1 h), evaluated both as the maximum GH peak and as integrated area under the curve (AUC), was significantly lower in the obese children than in the controls. Simultaneous administration of Gal plus GHRH significantly increased the GH response to GHRH in all the obese subjects, so that their mean peak GH levels and AUC after Gal plus GHRH were similar to those of the control children after GHRH. Also, in control children Gal caused a significant augmentation of the GH response to GHRH. Mean peak GH levels and mean AUC after Gal plus GHRH were significantly higher in the controls than in the obese children given the same treatment. Our data indicate that obese children have a blunted GH response to Gal, which, however, is able to enhance the GH response to GHRH. This observation strengthens the view that the mechanism of action of Gal involves modulation of endogenous somatostatin (SRIH) release. In addition, similarity between the effects of Gal and pyridostigmine on baseline and GHRH-stimulated GH release in obese children may indicate the existence of a cholinergic link in the action of Gal.     

Growth hormone (GH) release after administration of GH-releasing hormone in relation to endogenous 24-h GH secretion in short children

Endogenous GH secretion was measured every 20 min for 24 h in 36 short children. This was immediately followed by an i.v. injection of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)(1-29)-NH2 (1 microgram/kg), and GH was estimated every 15 min for the following 2 h. The aim was to determine whether endogenous pulsatile GH secretion had any relation to, or influence on, the GH release induced by GHRH. A high variability was found both in the 24-h GH secretion expressed as area under the curve above the baseline (0-1588 mU/l x 24 h) and the maximal GH response to GHRH (5-296 mU/l), as well as after an arginine-insulin tolerance test (4-59 mU/l). We found a positive correlation (correlation coefficient of Spearman (rs) = 0.49; P less than 0.01) between the GH response to GHRH and the spontaneous GH secretion over a 24-h period, in spite of a negative correlation (rs = -0.80; P less than 0.01) with the GH secretion during the preceding 3 h. We conclude that the GH response to a GHRH test correlates with endogenous GH secretion in short children, and may be helpful in estimating the ability to release GH. It is important, however, to be aware of the influence of the spontaneous GH secretion during the 3 h immediately preceding administration of GHRH.     

Galanin does not affect the growth hormone-releasing hormone-stimulated growth hormone secretion in patients with hyperthyroidism.

Patients with hyperthyroidism have reduced spontaneous and stimulated growth hormone (GH) secretion. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of galanin, a novel neuropeptide which stimulates GH secretion in man, on the GH response to GHRH in patients with hyperthyroidism. Eight untreated hyperthyroid patients with Graves' disease (6F, 2M, aged 25-50 years) and six healthy volunteers (3F, 3M, aged 27-76 years) underwent from -10 to 30 min in random order: (i) porcine galanin, iv, 500 micrograms in 100 ml saline; or (ii) saline, iv, 100 ml. A bolus of human GHRH(1-29)NH2, 100 micrograms, was injected iv at 0 min. Hyperthyroid patients showed blunted GH peaks after GHRH+saline (10.2 +/- 2.5 micrograms/l) compared to normal subjects (20.7 +/- 4.8 micrograms/l, p < 0.05). GH peaks after GHRH+galanin were also significantly lower in hyperthyroid subjects (12.5 +/- 3 micrograms/l) compared to normal subjects (43.8 +/- 6 micrograms/l, p < 0.05). That galanin is not able to reverse the blunted GH response to GHRH in hyperthyroidism suggests that hyperthyroxinemia may either increase the somatostatin release by the hypothalamus or directly affect the pituitary GH secretory capacity.     

The negative GH auto-feedback in childhood: effects of rhGH and/or GHRH on the somatotroph response to GHRH or hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in children

Aim of the present study was to further clarify the negative GH auto-feedback mechanisms in childhood. To this goal we studied the effects of rhGH and/or GHRH administration on the GH response to GHRH or hexarelin (HEX), a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in normal short children. In 34 prepubertal children (12 girls and 22 boys, age 8.2- 14.2 yr) with normal short stature (normal height velocity and IGF-I levels) the following tests were performed: group A (no.=11): GHRH (GHRH 1 - 29, Geref, Serono; 1 microg/kg iv at 150 min) preceded by saline or GHRH at 0 min; group B (no.=6): GHRH preceded by saline or rhGH (0.005 IU/kg iv at 0 min); group C (no.=6): GHRH preceded by rhGH alone or combined with GHRH; group D (no.=6): HEX (2 microg/kg iv at 150 min) alone or preceded by rhGH. In group A, the GH response to GHRH was not modified by pre-treatment with GHRH (GH peak, mean+/-SEM: 16.7+/-2.9 vs 15.1+/-2.3 microg/l, respectively). In group B, the GH response to GHRH was clearly inhibited by rhGH (8.7+/-2.3 vs 38.8+/-4.5 microg/l, p<0.001); the GH rise after rhGH in group B overlapped with that after GHRH in group A. In group C, the GH response to GHRH after pre-treatment with rhGH (13.2+/-4.0 microg/l) was similar to that in group B and was not significantly modified by pre-treatment with rhGH+ GHRH (6.9+/-2.7 microg/l); the GH rise after rhGH+GHRH was higher (p<0.05) than that after rhGH alone. In group D, the GH response to HEX was significantly blunted by pre-treatment with rhGH (34.1+/-11.7 vs 51.2+/-17.9 microg/l, p<0.05). Our results demonstrate that in childhood the somatotroph response to GHRH is preserved after GHRH while it is inhibited after rhGH administration, which is also able to blunt the GH response to HEX. Thus, the somatostatin-mediated negative GH auto-feedback is already operative in childhood; the reason why the GHRH- induced GH rise is not inhibited by GHRH pre-treatment is unexplained.     

Pyridostigmine enhances, but does not normalise, the GH response to GH-releasing hormone in obese subjects

Obese patients are characterised by several neuroendocrine abnormalities, including characteristically a decrease in growth hormone responsiveness to GH-releasing hormone. In normal subjects, the GH response to GHRH is enhanced by the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, pyridostigmine. We have studied the effect of this drug on GH secretion in gross obesity. Twelve obese patients were studied (mean weight 156% of ideal) and compared with a group of 8 normal volunteers. Each subject was initially studied on two occasions, in random order, with GHRH (1-29) NH2 100 micrograms iv alone and following pretreatment with pyridostigmine 120 mg orally one hour prior to GHRH. In obese patients, the GH response to GHRH was significantly blunted when compared to controls (GH peak: 20 +/- 4 vs 44 +/- 16 micrograms/l; mean +/- SEM). After pyridostigmine, the response to GHRH was enhanced in the obese subjects, but remained significantly reduced compared to non-obese subjects treated with GHRH and pyridostigmine (GH peak: 30 +/- 5 vs 77 +/- 20 micrograms/l, respectively). In 6 subjects, higher doses of GHRH or pyridostigmine did not further increase GH responsiveness in obese patients. Our results suggest that obese patients have a disturbed cholinergic control of GH release, probably resulting from increased somatostatinergic tone. This disturbed regulation may be responsible, at least in part, for the blunted GH responses to provocative stimuli.