Patterns of failure with increasing intensification of induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia

Patterns of failure were studied in two consecutive randomized trials of intensified induction therapy carried out by the Australian Leukaemia Study Group (ALSG) between 1984 and 1991 to determine the impact of dose intensification. Patients received standard dose cytarabine and daunorubicin (7-3), 7-3 plus etoposide (7-3-7) or 7-3 plus high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC-3-7) chemotherapy. Patients with FAB M3 morphology were excluded. Time to failure (TTF) was defined as the time from randomization to induction death or removal from study for non-responders, or to relapse or death in complete response (CR) for complete responders. An estimated 86% of 470 de novo patients with acute myeloid leukaemia failed within 10 years of randomization, as a result of death in induction in 17% of the randomized patients, failure to achieve CR in a further 17%, relapse in 44% and death in CR in 8% of patients. An estimated 66% of patients failed as a result of refractory disease or relapse within that period (disease-related failures). Multifactor analysis identified age and peripheral blast count as the most significant pretreatment factors associated with overall TTF. These factors, together with cytogenetics, were significantly associated with disease-related failures. High-dose cytarabine in induction significantly decreased the disease-related failure rate as did allogeneic transplantation in first CR. The impact of high-dose cytarabine did not depend on the cytogenetic risk group.     

Intensive individualized induction therapy with behenoyl cytarabine, daunorubicin and 6-mercaptopurine followed by intensive consolidation including intermediate-dose continuous cytarabine, mitoxantron, etoposide and vinca alkaloids in acute myeloid leukemia in adults.

Forty-one consecutive adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were treated with an intensive individualized induction therapy of behenoyl cytarabine, daunorubicin, and 6-mercaptopurine, 29 patients (71%) achieved complete remission (CR). Patients then received three courses of intensive consolidation therapy, including intermediate-dose continuous cytarabine (400 mg/m2, for 5 days) and non-cross resistant drugs such as mitoxantron, etoposide and vincristine. During the course of the consolidation therapy, three patients died of infections and one died of myocardial infarction. Four patients underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The patients then received six courses of moderately intensive maintenance therapy for 1 year. The predicted 5-year continuing CR and disease-free survival rates of the CR patients were 62% (95% confidence limit, 41% to 83%) and 53% (33% to 73%), respectively. Although the number of patients in this study is small, the present study indicated that it may be possible to cure a fairly large proportion of AML patients by chemotherapy alone, if intensive induction therapy is followed by intensive consolidation therapy.     

A randomized trial of high-versus conventional-dose cytarabine in consolidation chemotherapy for adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia in first remission after induction therapy containing high-dose cytarabine

The value of administering sequential courses of chemotherapy containing high-dose cytarabine in both induction and consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has not been assessed in a prospective randomized trial. Two hundred ninety-two AML patients aged 15 to 60 years were enrolled in the Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) AML trial number 7 (M7) protocol to evaluate this question. All received induction therapy with the ICE protocol (idarubicin 9 mg/m2 x 3; cytarabine 3 g/m2 twice a day on days 1, 3, 5, 7; etoposide 75 mg/m2 x 7). Complete remission was achieved in 234 (80%) patients. Two hundred two patients in remission were then randomized to either a further identical cycle of ICE or 2 attenuated courses (cytarabine 100 mg/m2 daily x 5, idarubicin x 2, etoposide x 5 [IcE]). ICE consolidation therapy was more toxic than IcE, however, the treatment-related death rate was not significantly different. There was no difference between the 2 consolidation arms for relapse-free survival at 3 years (49% for ICE vs 46% for IcE; P = .66), survival following randomization (61% vs 62%; P = .91), or the cumulative incidence of relapse (43% vs 51%; P = .31), and there was no difference within cytogenetic risk groups. Intensive induction chemotherapy incorporating high-dose cytarabine results in high complete remission rates, but further intensive consolidation treatment does not appear to confer additional benefit.     

A randomized trial comparing standard versus high-dose daunorubicin induction in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

We conducted a phase 3 randomized trial comparing 2 different doses of daunorubicin as induction chemotherapy in young adults (60 years of age or younger) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Of 383 patients who were analyzed, 189 received standard-dose daunorubicin (SD-DN, 45 mg/m2 per day times 3 days) and 194 received high-dose daunorubicin (HD-DN, 90 mg/m2 per day times 3 days) in addition to cytarabine (200 mg/m2 per day times 7 days) to induce complete remission (CR). The CR rates were 72.0% in the SD-DN arm and 82.5% in the HD-DN arm (P = .014). At a median follow-up of 52.6 months, overall (OS) and event-free (EFS) survival were higher in the HD-DN arm than in the SD-DN arm (OS, 46.8% vs 34.6%, P = .030; EFS, 40.8% vs 28.4%, P = .030). Differences in CR rate and both OS and EFS remained significant after adjusting for other variables (CR, hazard ratio [HR], 1.802, P = .024; OS, HR, 0.739, P = .032; EFS, HR, 0.774, P = .048). The survival benefits of HD-DN therapy were evident principally in patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetic features. The toxicity profiles were similar in the 2 arms. In conclusion, HD-DN improved both the CR rate and survival duration compared with SD-DN in young adults with AML. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00474006.     

Increasing dose intensity of anthracycline antibiotics improves outcome in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia

To understand the effect of dose concentration in the overall survival of AML, we conducted a study on the efficacy and toxicity of a drug combination where the dose of daunorubicin was intensified. For this analysis, the outcome of patients entered into two consecutive prospective trials was compared. Inclusion criteria in both arms were identical and consisted of primary AML in adults. Treatment protocol for Cape Town Regimen 4 (CTR-IV) comprised of cytarabine infusion (100 mg/m(2)) and etoposide (100 mg/m(2)), injection daily for 7 days in combination with daunorubicin (45 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 2, and 3. Patients achieving remission were given two further courses of the same chemotherapy and received allogeneic or autologous transplantation. CTR-V was a similar treatment program, except that daunorubicin was escalated on days 1, 2, and 3 to 75 mg/m(2) during induction and to 60 mg/m(2) during a single consolidation. Patients were also offered stem cell transplantation. Between 1990 and 1997, 78 patients (median age 33; range 13-67 years) fulfilled entry criteria and received CTR-IV. From 1998 onwards, 35 patients (median age 36; range 15-66 years) were prospectively enlisted into the CTR-V trial. The patient population in CTR-V had fewer Caucasian individuals (P = 0.02) and had significantly lower presentation hemoglobin (P = 0.0002). Following initiation of induction chemotherapy, 40 patients failed to respond. Among these, 10 patients demised before day 28. Another 30 (25/69 CTR-IV and 5/32 in CTR-V groups; P = 0.01) had leukemia that was resistant to chemotherapy, and all died. Remission was achieved in 59% of patients treated with CTR-IV and 77% of those receiving CTR-V (P = 0.03). CR occurred with a single course in 64% versus 88% (P = 0.02), respectively. There were no differences in the toxicity profile between these two combinations. Disease recurred in 50% and 28% (P = 0.07) of patients. For the 113 individuals, median follow up is 254 (range 19-4,451) and 304 (12-1,702; P = 0.03) days. Survival is 23% and 40%, respectively, favoring patients treated with CTR-V (log rank; P = 0.03). Cox regression analysis showed that treatment group (P < 0.001), FAB type, hemoglobin level, and platelet count were independent factors for response to chemotherapy. Older age and not undergoing myeloablative therapy were the only adverse factors for survival. We conclude that increase in the treatment dose of daunorubicin in patients with AML led to a higher remission rate, particularly with a single course of chemotherapy and had an equivalent toxicity profile. This therapeutic modification is also likely to result in substantial reduction in patient stay in hospital and in the overall expenditure.     

Etoposide in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Australian Leukemia Study Group

Previously untreated patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) aged 15 to 70 years were randomized to either cytosine arabinoside 100 mg/m2/d continuous intravenous (IV) infusion days 1 through 7, daunorubicin 50 mg/m2/d IV days 1 through 3 (7-3), or the same drugs intensified with etoposide 75 mg/m2/d IV days 1 through 7 (7-3-7) as induction therapy. Patients achieving complete remission (CR) received two courses of consolidation therapy (5-2 or 5-2-5) followed by maintenance therapy. Of 264 eligible patients, CR occurred in 56% of 7-3 and 59% of 7-3-7 patients; 7-3-7 significantly improved remission duration (P = .01). The median remission duration was 12 months for 7-3 and 18 months for 7-3-7. Survival was similar when the two arms were compared overall. Subset analysis performed to identify patients with the most benefit showed that etoposide significantly prolonged remission duration in younger patients (less than 55 years) with a median of 12 months for 7-3 and 27 months for 7-3-7 (P = .01). Survival appeared to be prolonged with 7-3-7 in patients aged less than 55 years, with a median of 9 months for 7-3 as compared with 17 months for 7-3-7 (P = .03). In older patients (aged greater than or equal to 55 years), 7-3-7 was more toxic, with significantly more severe [World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 or 4] stomatitis (P = .02) and no additional clinical benefit. Hematologic toxicity for induction courses was similar, with granulocytopenia less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L for a median of 16 days per course for 7-3 and 15 days for 7-3-7. Hematologic toxicity was more severe for 5-2-5 consolidation courses (P = .003). Induction and consolidation therapy intensified with etoposide resulted in significantly improved remission duration but not survival.     

Outcome of a multicenter treatment program including autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for de novo acute myeloid leukemia

Abstract: The results of an intensive treatment program for patients 16–60 yr of age with de novo acute myeloid leukemia are presented. The patients were given conventional induction treatment with daunorubicin and cytarabine. Patients not entering complete remission (CR) after 1 course of daunorubicin/cytarabine were given 1 course of amsacrine/etoposide/cytarabine. Those entering complete remission received 3 consolidation courses using mitoxantrone, etoposide, amsacrine and cytarabine. One hundred and eighteen patients were enrolled. Complete remission was attained after 1–2 courses in 90 patients (76%). Another 6 patients reached CR after 3–4 induction courses for a total CR rate of 81%. If feasible, patients were offered either allogeneic or unpurged autologous bone marrow transplantation. Twenty-four patients underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation; 15 in first remission, 8 in second remission, 1 in early relapse. Thirty patients below 56 yr of age underwent autologous bone marrow transplantation in first remission. The overall probability of survival at 4 yr was 34%, and for patients below 40 yr of age 50%. Leukemia-free survival was 35% for the whole cohort of patients; 52% for patients below 40 yr of age. Patients undergoing allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation in first remission had an overall survival of 86% and 47%, respectively, while the probability of leukemia-free survival in these groups was 87% vs. 40% at 4 yr. The CR rate and long-term results of this intensive treatment program compare favorably with other recent studies using intensive consolidation with allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation or high dose cytarabine.     

A randomized study of clofarabine versus clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine as front-line therapy for patients aged 60 years and older with acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

We previously reported the feasibility of clofarabine and cytarabine combinations in AML. Questions remain as to (1) the therapeutic advantage of this combination and (2) the role of lower doses of clofarabine and cytarabine in older patients. We have conducted an adaptively randomized study of lower-dose clofarabine with or without low-dose cytarabine in previously untreated patients with AML aged 60 years and older. Patients received 30 mg/m(2) clofarabine intravenously daily for 5 days with or without 20 mg/m(2) cytarabine subcutaneously daily for 14 days as induction. Consolidation consisted of 3 days of clofarabine with or without 7 days of cytarabine. Seventy patients were enrolled. The median age was 71 years (range, 60-83 years). Sixteen patients received clofarabine and 54 the combination. Overall, 56% achieved complete remission (CR). CR rate was significantly higher with the combination (63% vs 31%; P = .025). Induction mortality was 19% with the combination versus 31% with clofarabine alone (P = .276). The combination showed better event-free survival (7.1 months vs 1.7 months; P = .04), but not overall survival (11.4 months vs 5.8 months; P = .1). Clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine has a higher response rate than clofarabine alone with comparable toxicity. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as no. NCT00088218.     

Continuous intravenous administration of daunorubicin and cytarabine for remission induction of poor risk acute myelogenous leukaemias and myelodysplastic syndromes

Seventeen consecutively admitted poor risk acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients and 4 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were treated with a remission-induction regimen consisting of a 7-day continuous intravenous infusion of conventional doses of cytarabine and of three 24-h constant rate infusions of daunorubicin administered intermittently on days 1, 3 and 5. The diagnoses were: relapsed primary AML in 6 patients, secondary AML in 11 patients (9 untreated, 2 relapsed) and MDS in 4 patients. The median age was 50 yr. Five of 6 patients with relapsed primary AML, 3 of 11 patients with secondary AML and 2 of 4 patients with MDS achieved complete remission (CR). The overall CR rate was 48% with a median remission duration of 5 months (range: 0.25-20 months). Few acute toxic side effects were observed thanks to the constant rate of infusion of daunorubicin.     

Attempts to improve treatment outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older patients: the results of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial

In an attempt to improve induction chemotherapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML),1314 patients were randomized to 1 of 3 induction treatments for 2 courses of DAT (daunorubicin, cytarabine, and thioguanine) 3 + 10, ADE (daunorubicin, cytarabine, and etoposide) 10 + 3 + 5, or MAC (mitoxantrone-cytarabine). The remission rate in the DAT arm was significantly better than ADE (62% vs 50%; P =.002) or MAC (62% vs 55%; P =.04). This benefit was seen in patients younger and older than 70 years. There were no differences between the induction schedules with respect to overall survival at 5 years (12% vs 8% vs 10%). A total of 226 patients were randomized to receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or placebo as supportive care from day 8 after the end of treatment course 1. The remission rate or survival were not improved by G-CSF, although the median number of days to recover neutrophils to 1.0 x 10(9)/L was reduced by 5 days. Patients who entered remission (n = 371) were randomized to stop after a third course (DAT 2 + 7) or after 6 courses, ie, a subsequent COAP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, cytarabine, and prednisolone), DAT 2 + 5, and COAP. The relapse risk (81% vs 73%), disease-free survival (16% vs 23%), and overall survival at 5 years (23% vs 22%) did not differ between the 3-course or 6-course arms. In addition to a treatment duration randomization, 362 patients were randomized to receive 12-month maintenance treatment with low-dose interferon, but no benefit was seen with respect to relapse risk, disease-free survival, or overall survival.     

A multicenter,open, non-comparative,phase II study of the combination of cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine), cytarabine,and G-CSF as induction therapy in refractory acute myeloid leukemia - a report of the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG)

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine, 2-CdA), cytarabine (Ara-C), and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) (CLAG) regimen in refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the multicenter phase II study. METHODS: The induction chemotherapy consisted of 2-CdA 5 mg/m2, Ara-C2 g/m2, and G-CSF. In the case of partial remission (PR), a second CLAG was administered. Patients in complete remission (CR) received two consolidation courses based on HD Ara-C, mitoxantrone or idarubicine, with or without 2-CdA. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients from 11 centers were registered; 50 primary resistant and eight early relapsed (CR1 < 6 months). CR was achieved in 29 (50%) patients, 19 (33%) were refractory, and 10 (17%) died early. Forty of 50 primary resistant patients received daunorubicin (DNR) and Ara-C as the first-line induction therapy (DA-7), 10 received additional 2-CdA (DAC-7). The CR rates after CLAG were 58% and 10%, respectively in each group (P = 0.015). Five of six patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/AML achieved CR. Hematologic toxicity was the most prominent toxicity of this regimen. The overall survival (OS, 1 yr) for the 58 patients as a whole, and the 29 patients in CR were 42% and 65%, respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS, 1 yr) was 29%. Only first-line induction treatment with DA-7 significantly influenced the probability of CR after CLAG. None of the analyzed factors significantly influenced DFS and OS. CONCLUSION: CLAG regimen has significant anti-leukemic activity and an acceptable toxicity in refractory AML. The addition of 2-CdA to the first-line induction treatment may worsen the results of salvage with CLAG. The high CR rate in patients with MDS preceding AML deserves further observation.     

FLAG-IDA in the treatment of refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: single-center experience

We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity profiles of the combination of fludarabine, high-dose cytosine arabinoside (AraC), idarubicin, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in refractory/relapsed acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) patients. Between October 1998 and February 2002, 46 AML patients were treated with FLAG-IDA (fludarabine 30 mg/m(2), AraC 2 g/m(2) for 5 days, idarubicin 10 mg/m(2) for 3 days, and G-CSF 5 micro g/kg from day +6 until neutrophil recovery). Thirty patients were in relapse after conventional chemotherapy including cytarabine, etoposide, and daunorubicin or mitoxantrone according to the GIMEMA protocols. Four were in relapse after autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation and two after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Ten patients had refractory disease (after 10 days of standard doses of cytarabine, 3 days of mitoxantrone or daunorubicin, and 5 days of etoposide). Recovery of neutrophils and platelets required a median of 19 and 22 days from the start of therapy. Complete remission (CR) was obtained in 24 of 46 patients (52.1%) and 3 of 46 (6.6%) died during reinduction therapy: 2 due to cerebral hemorrhage and 1 due to fungemia ( Candida tropicalis). Fever >38.5 degrees C was observed in 40 of 46 patients (86.9%), 27 had fever of unknown origin (FUO) and 13 documented infections; 31 of 46 (67.3%) developed mucositis and 14 of 46 (30.4%) had grade 2 WHO transient liver toxicity. After achieving CR, 11 patients received allogeneic stem cell transplantation, 4 patients received autologous stem cell transplantation, 4 were judged unable to receive any further therapy, and 5 refused other therapy. Ten patients are at present in continuous CR after a median follow-up of 13 months (range: 4-24). In our experience, FLAG-IDA is a well-tolerated and effective regimen in relapsed/refractory AML. The toxicity is acceptable, enabling most patients to receive further treatment, including transplantation procedures.     

Predictors of response to reinduction chemotherapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia who do not achieve complete remission with frontline induction chemotherapy

Eighty-one patients with acute myeloid leukemia who had persistent leukemia following standard induction therapy with cytarabine plus daunorubicin (7+3 regimen) underwent reinduction therapy with a combination of mitoxantrone, etoposide, and high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC). Patients achieving complete remission (CR) then received consolidation therapy with HiDAC plus mitoxantrone. Patients with matched sibling donors were referred for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in CR-1. The overall response rate to reinduction was 53%. The major adverse predictors of CR on multivariate analysis were poor risk cytogenetics, a higher % bone marrow blasts prior to reinduction therapy and increased age. The median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 9 months and the estimated 2-year RFS was 30%. No significant predictors of RFS or overall survival (OS) were found among the patients achieving CR. Patients undergoing allogeneic BMT in CR-1 after double induction had a 50% 2-year OS. Patients relapsing after achieving CR with double induction had a poor outcome with a 4% 1-year OS. The results indicate that patients with poor risk cytogenetics or marrow blast percentage >or= 60% following 7+3 induction have a low probability of achieving CR with reinduction and should be considered for novel approaches to improve CR rates. Patients achieving CR are at high risk of relapse and should be considered for allogeneic BMT or novel strategies to attempt to reduce relapse rates.     

Postremission therapy in older patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a randomized trial comparing mitoxantrone and intermediate-dose cytarabine with standard-dose cytarabine

The treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains unsatisfactory, with complete remission (CR) achieved in only approximately 50% and long-term disease-free survival in 10% to 20%. Three hundred eighty-eight patients (60 years of age and older) with newly diagnosed de novo AML were randomly assigned to receive placebo (P) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or GM in a double-blind manner, beginning 1 day after the completion of 3 days of daunorubicin and 7 days of cytarabine therapy. No differences were found in the rates of leukemic regrowth, CR, or infectious complications in either arm. Of 205 patients who achieved CR, 169 were medically well and were randomized to receive cytarabine alone or a combination of cytarabine and mitoxantrone. With a median follow-up of 7.7 years, the median disease-free survival times were 11 months and 10 months for those randomized to cytarabine or cytarabine/mitoxantrone, respectively. Rates of relapse, excluding deaths in CR, were 77% for cytarabine and 82% for cytarabine/mitoxantrone. Induction randomization had no effect on leukemic relapse rate or remission duration in either postremission arm. Because cytarabine/mitoxantrone was more toxic and no more effective than cytarabine, it was concluded that this higher-dose therapy had no benefit in the postremission management of older patients with de novo AML. These results suggest the need to develop novel therapeutic strategies for these patients. (Blood. 2001;98:548-553)     

标准剂量去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷治疗急性髓细胞白血病

目的:探讨标准剂量的去甲氧柔红霉素(IDA)联合阿糖胞苷(Ara-C)治疗急性髓细胞白血病(AML)的疗效和不良反应。方法:14例AML患者,年龄13～70岁(中位年龄36岁),男8例,女6例。初治AML10例,难治、复发AML4例。所有患者均在治疗前进行染色体核型分析,4例染色体异常。诱导方案为IDA 12 mg·m-2·d-1,第1～3天,Ara-C 100 mg·m-2·d-1,持续静脉点滴,第1～7天。结果:1个疗程结束后总有效率92．9％(13／14),完全缓解率85．7％(12／14),其中初治AML的CR率为90．0％(9／10),复发、难治AML的CR率为75．0％(3／4),3例染色体异常患者达细胞遗传学缓解,未发生早期死亡。化疗的不良反应主要为骨髓抑制和粒细胞缺乏所致感染,未见严重的非造血系统不良反应。结论:标准剂量的IDA联合Ara-C 24 h持续静脉点滴,为初治、复发难治AML的高效、安全的方案。     

A randomized investigation of high-dose versus standard-dose cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study

Interest in high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) for both induction and postremission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) prompted the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) to initiate a randomized trial comparing HDAC with standard-dose cytarabine (SDAC) for remission induction of previously untreated AML and to compare high-dose treatment versus conventional doses for consolidation therapy. Patients less than 65 years of age with de novo or secondary AML were randomized for induction between SDAC 200 mg/ m2/d for 7 days by continuous infusion or HDAC at 2 g/ m2 intravenously every 12 hours for 12 doses; both groups received daunorubicin (DNR) at 45 mg/m2/d intravenously for 3 days. Complete responders to SDAC were randomized to receive either two additional courses of SDAC plus DNR or one course of HDAC plus DNR. Complete responders to HDAC were nonrandomly assigned to receive one additional course of HDAC plus DNR. Of patients randomized between SDAC (n = 493) and HDAC (n = 172) induction, 361 achieved complete remission (CR). The CR rate was slightly poorer with HDAC: 55% versus 58% with SDAC for patients aged less than 50, and 45% (HDAC) versus 53% (SDAC) for patients aged 50 to 64 (age-adjusted one-tailed P = .96). With a median follow-up time of 51 months, survival was not significantly better with HDAC (P = .41); the estimated survival rate at 4 years was 32% (HDAC) versus 22% (SDAC) for those aged less than 50, and 13% (HDAC) versus 11% (SDAC) for those aged 50 to 64. However, relapse-free survival was somewhat better following HDAC Induction (P = .049): 33% (HDAC) versus 21% (SDAC) at 4 years for those aged less than 50, and 21% (HDAC) versus 9% (SDAC) for those aged 50 to 64. Induction with HDAC was associated with a significantly increased risk of fatal (P = .0033) and neurologic (P < .0001) toxicity. Among patients who achieved CR with SDAC, survival and disease-free survival (DFS) following consolidation randomization were not significantly better with HDAC compared with SDAC (P = .77 and .46, respectively). Patients who received both HDAC induction and consolidation had the best postremission outcomes; however, the proportion of CR patients who did not go on to protocol consolidation therapy was more than twice as high after HDAC induction compared with SDAC. Induction therapy with HDAC plus DNR was associated with greater toxicity than SDAC plus DNR, but with no improvement in CR rate or survival. Following CR induction with SDAC, consolidation with HDAC increased toxicity but not survival or DFS. In a nonrandomized comparison, patients who received both HDAC induction and consolidation had superior survival and DFS compared with those who received SDAC induction with either SDAC or HDAC consolidation.     

Double induction strategy for acute myeloid leukemia: the effect of high-dose cytarabine with mitoxantrone instead of standard-dose cytarabine with daunorubicin and 6-thioguanine: a randomized trial by the German AML Cooperative Group.

Early intensification of chemotherapy with high-dose cytarabine either in the postremission or remission induction phase has recently been shown to improve long-term relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Comparable results have been produced with the double induction strategy. The present trial evaluated the contribution of high-dose versus standard-dose cytarabine to this strategy. Between March 1985 and November 1992, 725 eligible patients 16 to 60 years of age with newly diagnosed primary AML entered the trial. Before treatment started, patients were randomized between two versions of double induction: 2 courses of standard-dose cytarabine (ara-C) with daunorubicin and 6-thioguanine (TAD) were compared with 1 course of TAD followed by high-dose cytarabine (3 g/m2 every 12 hours for 6 times) with mitoxantrone (HAM). Second courses started on day 21 before remission criteria were reached, regardless of the presence or absence of blast cells in the bone marrow. Patients in remission received consolidation by TAD and monthly maintenance with reduced TAD courses for 3 years. The complete remission (CR) rate in the TAD-TAD compared with the TAD-HAM arm was 65% versus 71% (not significant [NS]), and the early and hypoplastic death rate was 18% versus 14% (NS). The corresponding RFS after 5 years was 29% versus 35% (NS). An explorative analysis identified a subgroup of 286 patients with a poor prognosis representing 39% of the entire population; they included patients with more than 40% residual blasts in the day-16 bone marrow, patients with unfavorable karyotype, and those with high levels of serum lactate dehydrogenase. Their CR rate was 65% versus 49% (p =.004) in favor of TAD-HAM and was associated with a superior event-free survival (median, 7 v 3 months; 5 years, 17% v 12%; P =.012) and overall survival (median, 13 v 8 months; 5 years, 24% v 18%; P =.009). This suggests that the incorporation of high-dose cytarabine with mitoxantrone may contribute a specific benefit to poor-risk patients that, however, requires further substantiation. Double induction, followed by consolidation and maintenance, proved a safe and effective strategy and a new way of delivering early intensification treatment for AML.     

An effective age-unrestricted m-AMSA-based second-line regimen for poor prognosis acute myeloid leukaemia

Abstract: The efficacy and toxicity of a regimen consisting of amsacrine (m-AMSA), cytarabine, and thioguanine for remission-induction therapy in poor prognosis categories of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) were determined in a single arm study of 46 patients. The study group consisted of 17 patients with disease refractory to daunorubicin plus cytarabine-based induction regimens, 22 patients with disease which had relapsed during daunorubicin plus cytarabine maintenance therapy, or following completion of this maintenance programme after receiving > 500 mg daunorubicin/m², and 7 previously untreated patients where cardiac disease contraindicated anthracycline therapy. Complete remission (CR) was attained in 46%, and probability of survival was comparable to published results for first-line treatment with daunorubicin plus cytarabine regimens. There was no statistically significant difference in CR rate or probability of survival between these three categories of poor prognosis AML, and cardiotoxic complications were uncommon despite extensive anthracycline exposure in the majority. In the 43% of patients who were 60–76 years of age, there was no statistically significant difference in CR rate or probability of survival relative to patients <60 years. This observation fails to support the view that less myelotoxic regimens with lesser efficacy should be the basic approach to treatment of AML in patients > 60 years of age.     

Liposomal daunorubicin versus standard daunorubicin: long term follow-up of the GIMEMA GSI 103 AMLE randomized trial in patients older than 60 years with acute myelogenous leukaemia

This randomized phase III clinical trial explored the efficacy of DaunoXome (DNX) versus Daunorubicin (DNR) in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients aged >60 years. Three hundred and one AML patients were randomized to receive DNR (45 mg/m(2) days 1-3) or DNX (80 mg/m(2) days 1-3) plus cytarabine (AraC; 100 mg/m(2) days 1-7). Patients in complete remission (CR) received a course of the same drugs as consolidation and then were randomized for maintenance with AraC+ all trans retinoic acid or no further treatment. Among 153 patients in the DNR arm, 78 (51.0%) achieved CR, 55 (35.9%) were resistant and 20 (13.1%) died during induction. Among 148 patients in the DNX arm, 73 (49.3%) achieved CR, 47 (31.8%) were resistant and 28 (18.9%) died during induction. Univariate analysis showed no difference as to induction results. After CR, DNX showed a higher incidence of early deaths (12.5% vs. 2.6% at 6 months, P = 0.053) but a lower incidence of relapse beyond 6 months (59% vs. 78% at 24 months, P = 0.064), with a cross in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves and a later advantage for DNX arm after 12 months from diagnosis. DNX seems to improve OS and DFS in the long-term follow-up, because of a reduction in late relapses.     

Autologous transplantation gives encouraging results for young adults with favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia, but is not improved with gemtuzumab ozogamicin

We report the results of a prospective, randomized phase 3 trial evaluating the use of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) in an intensive consolidation approach in 657 patients 17-60 years of age. Patients in first complete remission (CR1) after cytarabine and standard- or high-dose daunorubicin induction received 2 cycles of consolidation with high-dose cytarabine followed by peripheral blood progenitor cell collection. The 352 patients who entered consolidation were randomized to receive GO (n = 132) or not (n = 138) and then proceeded to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). GO was given to 67 patients. Median follow-up was 50.9 months. Results of the intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated a 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 33.6% versus 35.9% (P = .54) and an overall survival (OS) of 41.3% versus 41.9% (P = .52) for those randomized to receive GO versus no GO, respectively. Patients with favorable- and intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with high-dose daunorubicin and autologous HCT had 4-year DFS rates of 60% and 40% and OS rates of 80% and 49.3%, respectively. For younger AML patients in CR1, autologous HCT should be considered in favorable- and intermediate-cytogenetic risk patients who do not have an allogeneic donor. The addition of a single dose of GO in this setting did not improve outcomes.