Open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: proximal aortic control by endoaortic balloon - a novel approach

Patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with unfavorable anatomy for endovascular aneurysm repair have to undergo open surgical repair. Open surgery has its own morbidity in terms of proximal clamping and declamping, bleeding and prolonged hospital stay and mortality. We present two such patients with juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm who underwent open surgical repair. The proximal aortic control during open surgical repair of the aneurysm was achieved by endoaortic balloon occlusion technique.     

Endovascular treatment of a noninfected anastomotic juxtarenal aortic aneurysm

An 82-year-old man underwent an endovascular procedure with a commercially available endovascular graft for an anastomotic juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. The anastomotic aneurysm, which showed no sign of infection, developed 4 years after implantation of an aortic end-to-end graft for an infrarenal aortic aneurysm. The aneurysm was diagnosed during routine ultrasonographic follow-up; there was no apparent infection of the graft. Aortography confirmed the diagnosis and also revealed a small pseudoaneurysm at the level of the distal aortic anastomosis. Endovascular surgery was performed in the operating room with the guidance of C-arm fluoroscopy and intravascular ultrasound. Two Vanguard Straight Endovascular Aortic Graft Cuffs (26 x 50 mm and 24 x 50 mm) were implanted, successfully excluding both the anastomotic juxtarenal aortic aneurysm and the distal pseudoaneurysm. The renal arteries were preserved and no early or late endoleaks were observed. The patient was discharged 2 days after the procedure. Sixteen months later, he was alive and well, with no endovascular leakage, no enlargement of the aortic aneurysms, and no sign of infection. In our opinion, this experience shows that commercially available endovascular grafts may be used successfully to treat anastomotic aortic aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms.     

An update on the 'fast-track' abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Patients who have unfavourable anatomy for endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm require open repair. This is particularly the case for juxtarenal aortic aneurysms, or those patients with small or occluded iliac access vessels.An experience of 'fast-track' abdominal aortic aneurysm repair that was previously reported is updated in the present case. A retroperitoneal approach to the aorta is taken, using a small incision, and is followed by a patient care pathway protocol that demonstrated excellent results and a shortened length of stay. The present update on 56 patients is approximately double the previously reported experience.     

Two-stage combined endovascular and surgical approach for recurrent thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm.

PURPOSE: To present a 2-stage combined endovascular and surgical approach for recurrent thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). CASE REPORT: A 78-year-old man with previous surgical repairs of infrarenal abdominal and descending thoracic aortic aneurysms was referred for dysphagia due to an enlarging 9-cm aneurysm extending from the mid thoracic to the suprarenal aorta. Because no suitable endograft was available, an open repair was attempted, but the presence of a "frozen" chest made the redo procedure extremely difficult. A 2-stage treatment was thus decided upon. First, a retrograde bifurcated bypass graft was implanted from the abdominal aortic graft to the superior mesenteric and celiac arteries. Twenty days later, the TAAA was successfully excluded with a stent-graft, during which spinal fluid drainage was performed to prevent paraplegia. At 6 months, computed tomography showed patency of the endoprosthesis and visceral grafts. At 1 year, the patient remains asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates that a 2-stage combined endovascular and surgical approach may be a safe and effective alternative to reoperation for recurrent TAAA.     

Proximal clamping levels in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

In the surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm, the single proximal cross-clamp can be placed at 3 alternative aortic levels: infrarenal, hiatal, and thoracic. We performed this retrospective study to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the 3 main aortic clamping locations. Eighty patients presented at our institution with abdominal aortic aneurysms from March 1993 through May 1998. Fifty of these patients had intact aneurysms and underwent elective surgery, and 30 had ruptured aneurysms that necessitated emergency surgery. Proximal aortic clamping was applied at the infrarenal level in 24 patients (22 from the intact aneurysm group, 2 from the ruptured group), at the hiatal level in 34 patients (22 intact, 12 ruptured), and at the thoracic level (descending aorta) via a limited left lateral thoracotomy in 22 patients (6 intact, 16 ruptured). Early mortality rates (within 30 days) were 4% (2 of 50 patients) among patients with intact aneurysms and 40% (12 of 30 patients) among those with ruptured aneurysms. In the 2 patients from the intact aneurysm group, proximal aortic clamps were applied at the hiatal level. In the ruptured aneurysm group, proximal aortic clamps were placed at the thoracic level in 10 patients, the infrarenal level in 1, and the hiatal level in 1. According to our study, the clinical status of the patient and the degree of operative urgency--as determined by the extent of the aneurysm--generally dictate the proximal clamp location. Patients who present with aneurysmal rupture or hypovolemic shock benefit from thoracic clamping, because it restores the blood pressure and allows time to replace the volume deficit. Infrarenal placement is advantageous in patients with intact aneurysms if there is sufficient space for the clamp between the renal arteries and the aortic aneurysm. In patients with juxtarenal aneurysms, hiatal clamping enables safe and easy anastomosis to the healthy aorta. Clamping at this level also helps prevent late anastomotic aneurysm formation, which is frequently encountered after inadvertent anastomosis of the graft to a diseased portion of the aorta. Further studies are needed in order to confirm these results.     

Mycotic aneurysm of the infrarenal aorta

The mycotic aneurysms of the infrarenal aorta (MAIA) are extremely rare and the associated morbidity and mortality is very high. The classification of infected aneurysms considers four types: a) true mycotic aneurysms, b) secondary mycotic aneurysms due to bacterial arteritis, c) infected preexisting abdominal aortic aneurysms and d) post-traumatic infected false aneurysms. The prognosis of true MAIA's is better than the other forms of infected aneurysms. The standard treatment includes the resection of the aneurysm and infectious surrounding tissues and the restoration of the flow using ex situ (axillobifemoral) bypass or in situ replacement with autologous vein or a rifampicinebonded graft. We present a case of mycotic aneurysm of the infrarenal aorta and a brief discussion of the alternative treatments from the relevant literature.     

Surgical treatment of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

Thirty patients with juxtarenal infrarenal and 16 patients with suprarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms underwent elective (58%) or urgent (42%) repair. Twenty-three patients were hypertensive and 20 had impaired renal function preoperatively. Nineteen patients required combined aortic and renal artery reconstruction, in which reimplantation was the most common technique used. The perioperative mortality rate was 7.4% in the elective group and 36.8% in the urgent group. Rupture of the aneurysm and a preoperative high serum creatinine level were risk factors correlating to early mortality. Among survivors, 61% showed a rise in serum creatinine in the early postoperative period. In all but one the transient renal insufficiency was resolved within one month. Of the hypertensive patients 64% were cured or under control with medication following combined reconstruction. These results demonstrate that surgical repair of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms can be performed with an acceptable mortality and morbidity.     

Suprarenal or supraceliac aortic clamping during repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Suprarenal or supraceliac aortic clamping during repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms can be complicated by renal, hepatic, and intestinal ischemia. To determine whether suprarenal or supraceliac clamping increases morbidity and mortality we retrospectively reviewed our recent nonrandomized experience. Between January 1993 and December 1998, 716 patients underwent elective (n=682) or urgent (n=34) infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Infrarenal clamping was used in 516 (72. 1 %) and suprarenal or supraceliac clamping in 200 (279%). The suprarenal/supraceliac group had significantly more older patients (> or = 70 years of age) (65.5% vs 477%) and a higher incidence of preoperative renal insufficiency (75% vs 5.5%). Suprarenal or supraceliac clamping was used during repair of ruptured (n=25), juxtarenal (n=7), or inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=4); during concomitant renal or visceral revascularization (n=43); in other difficult settings (n=13); or at the surgeon's discretion (n=108). The decision for such clamping was always made during surgery In treating ruptured aneurysms, suprarenal/supraceliac clamping (25/200) was used more often than infrarenal clamping (9/516) (12.5% vs 1.74%). Operative times were similar in both groups, but transfusion requirements and length of hospital stay were slightly greater in the suprarenal/supraceliac group. Perioperative mortality was 3.1% overall, but higher in the suprarenal/ supraceliac group than in the infrarenal (75% vs 1.4%). Postoperative complications developed in 26 (13%) of patients who underwent suprarenal/supraceliac clamping. Abdominal re-exploration was required in 9 other patients. We conclude that, despite associated comorbidities, elective suprarenal/supraceliac clamping during infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is safe, facilitates repair, and does not significantly increase mortality.     

Aortic dissection after open repair of an infrarenal aortic aneurysm

INTRODUCTION:

A case of thoracic-abdominal dissection after open surgical exclusion of an infrarenal aortic aneurysm is presented.

CASE PRESENTATION:

A 62-year-old woman was diagnosed with an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with a rapid increase in maximal diameter. She underwent surgery for aneurysm exclusion by an end-to-end aortoaortic bypass with Dacron collagen (Intervascular; WL Gore & Associates Inc, USA). After 15 days, she was admitted to the emergency department with intense epigastric and lumbar pain. Computed tomography angiography with contrast revealed an aortic dissection with origin in the proximal bypass anastomosis and cranial extension to the thoracic aorta. The true lumen at the level of the eighth thoracic vertebra was practically collapsed by the false lumen. The celiac trunk, and the mesenteric and renal arteries were perfused by the true lumen. After the acute phase of the aortic dissection, surgical repair was planned. Two paths of false lumen were found – one at the thoracic aorta and the second in the proximal bypass anastomosis. Surgical repair comprised two approaches. First, a Valiant Thoracic stent graft (Medtronic Inc, UK) was implanted distal from the left subclavian artery, expanding the collapsed true lumen and covering the false and dissected lumen. Second, an infrarenal Endurant abdominal stent graft (Medtronic Inc) was implanted. This second device was complemented with an aortic infrarenal extension using a Talent abdominal stent graft (Medtronic Inc) in the infrarenal aortic neck to achieve a hermetic seal. The postoperative clinical course was uneventful, and her symptoms were completely resolved in six months.

CONCLUSION:

Arteritis must be taken into account in young patients with high inflammatory markers. Covered stents and endoprosthetic devices seem to be effective methods to seal the dissected lumen.     

Infrarenal aortic aneurysm

An abdominal aortic aneurysm is defined as the increase of infrarenal aortic diameter of 3.0 cm and more. Infrarenal aortic aneurysm is frequent in the elderly and causes 1-3% of all deaths among men aged between 65 and 85 years. These aneurysms are typically asymptomatic until the life threatening event of rupture. Therefore screening of risk populations like elderly persons and persons with cardiovascular risk factors for aortic aneurysm seems to be most important. An aortic aneurysm is usually detected by sonography. An infrarenal aortic aneurysm with a diameter of 5.0-5.5 cm should be treated either with open surgical or endovascular therapy. If surgical or endovascular therapy is indicated, additional computer tomography (CT) or magnet resonance imaging (MRI) are necessary. The mode of treatment mainly depends on patient co-morbidity and on morphology of the aneurysm according to the CT/MRI-findings and should be determined individually.     

Endovascular exclusion of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm after retrograde visceral artery revascularization

Historically, open surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms has been associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Furthermore, endovascular exclusion alone can restrict blood flow to visceral arteries. We report a case of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm that was repaired using a hybrid approach: surgery followed by an endovascular procedure. A 53-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital for endovascular exclusion of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm that included the superior mesenteric artery and the celiac artery. Aorto-mesenteric and aorto-celiac artery bypass grafting was performed to create a landing zone for subsequent endovascular exclusion of the aneurysm, which was completed successfully 6 weeks after the bypass procedure. For thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms that extend beyond the superior mesenteric artery and the celiac or renal arteries, a hybrid approach, consisting of limited surgical treatment followed by endovascular exclusion of the aneurysm, may yield optimal results in selected patients with serious preoperative comorbidities.     

Late aneurysm rupture after repressurization of a thrombosed stent-graft.

PURPOSE: To report late abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture after endovascular stent-graft repair despite complete thrombotic stent-graft occlusion. CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old man underwent successful endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with a Stentor device in 1995. In the interim course, the patient developed complete thrombotic stent-graft occlusion, which was treated with an axillobifemoral bypass. After 8 years, the patient presented with a reperfused and ruptured infrarenal AAA. Open repair was performed, with a good clinical result and exclusion of the AAA. CONCLUSION: Thrombosed stent-grafts and aneurysms can transmit systemic arterial pressure and cause late rupture. Lifelong surveillance is mandatory in EVAR patients.     

Repair of a false aneurysm of the aortic arch

A 66-year-old man having previously undergone repair of aneurysms of the ascending, transverse and infrarenal aorta, presented with a large false aneurysm of the aortic arch. Successful repair of the aneurysm was achieved under a state of profound hypothermia and circulatory arrest. The patient remains well and free from aortic aneurysmal disease two years after surgery.     

Endovascular exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms: initial experience with stent-grafts in cardiology practice

The use of an endovascular stent-graft prosthesis for the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms is receiving increasing attention as an option that may avoid the significant morbidity and mortality associated with open surgical treatment. We studied the clinical effectiveness of stent-grafts in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Between October 1995 and May 1998, 33 patients underwent infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm exclusion with a homemade polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent, and between November 1998 and September 1999, 56 patients underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm exclusion with the Medtronic AneuRx stent-graft. Overall, these patients represented a high-risk surgical group. The technical success rate was 100% in both groups. No patient required immediate conversion to open repair. With the polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent, the primary success rate was 33%, and the secondary success rate was 76%. In the AneuRx group, the primary success rate was 82.8%, and the secondary success rate was 85.3% at 6 months. There was no procedural or 1-month mortality or major morbidity in either group. By showing that infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms can be treated safely and successfully with an endoluminal stent-graft, our early results provide additional support for the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Further follow-up studies will determine the long-term ability of such treatment to prevent aneurysmal rupture and death.     

Hybrid endovascular and off-pump open surgical treatment for synchronous aneurysms of the aortic arch, brachiocephalictrunk, and abdominal aorta

A 71-year-old patient was admitted for synchronous aneurysms of the aortic arch, brachiocephalic trunk, and juxtarenal abdominal aorta involving the iliac arteries. The patient first underwent open surgical repair of the juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm by means of aorto-bifemoral bypass. Three months later, he underwent off-pump surgical repair of the aneurysm of the brachiocephalic trunk and bypass grafting from the ascending aorta to the brachiocephalic trunk and the left common carotid artery, followed by successful exclusion of the aneurysm of the aortic arch by deployment of a Zenith TX1 custom-made endograft, inserted through a limb of the aorto-bifemoral graft. Combined endovascular and open surgical treatment is an appealing new alternative to open surgical repair for complex aortic diseases. Debranching of the aortic arch enables endovascular grafting in this area, thereby avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest. Staged and simultaneous procedures should be considered for the treatment of complex aortic diseases even in poor-risk patients; however due to the investigative characteristics of these procedures, patient selection and postoperative follow-up should be carried out with utmost attention.     

Surgical Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Lost Art?

Endovascular repair of abdominal aneurysms has become the dominant treatment modality for infrarenal aneurysms. Initial reports showed a constant number of open repairs although there was a shift toward complicated juxtra-renal aneurysms. In the past several years, more aggressive endoluminal approaches and the introduction of fenestrated grafts have appeared to dilute the open aneurysm operating experience. Coupled with work hours restrictions and shorter training paradigms, opportunities for training residents in open repair of abdominal aneurysms are decreasing. We envision that future treatment of complicated aortic aneurysms will likely entail advanced fellowship training in open repair and referral of complicated abdominal aneurysms to tertiary care centers.     

Ten-year results following elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: 10-year results after elective operation for infrarenal aortic aneurysm considering the influence of risk factors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Retrospective study with 5-12 year postoperative follow-up. SETTING: University hospital (Klinikum Grosshadern, Munich). PATIENTS: The long-term follow-up was based on 521 (95.6%) out of 545 consecutive patients operated upon electively for abdominal aortic aneurysm between 1978 and 1987. INTERVENTIONS: The infrarenal aneurysms were excluded by aortic tube grafts (314 patients, 59%) or bifurcation grafts (231 patients, 41%). MEASURES: The birthday, operation day and eventually the day of death in the hospital were documented in the charts. The patient's state or cause of death were elicited on the phone 5 to 12 years after the operation. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated based on these data and compared to age-matched normal male populations. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 6.4%. The cumulative rate of survival following elective surgery was 65% at 5 years and 41% at 10 years, the mean survival time being 95.1 months. Age, coronary artery disease and hypertension had a significant influence on the cumulative survival. Patients with aorto-coronary bypass had a better long-term outcome than those without bypass surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The excellent long-term results within a high-risk population support elective surgery of infrarenal aortic aneurysms. Results of new interventional techniques will have to be compared with this "golden standard" follow-up.     

One-stage coronary bypass and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

A group of 29 patients with simultaneous coronary disease and abdominal aortic aneurysm were treated two protocols: Group I, 16 patients had coronary bypass surgery and then abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at a later date. This required two hospitalizations and two separate surgeries. Group II, 11 patients, underwent coronary bypass surgery and repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in one sitting. Group III, 2 patients, had PTCA prior to AAA repair. There were 3.1 bypass grafts implanted (Group I), vs 2.9 (Groups II) (ns). All abdominal aneurysms were infrarenal and 22 patients had straight tube graft replacement (76%), and seven bifurcated grafts. Two patients with angina also had symptomatic AAA. Period of hospitalization, morbidity, mortality, time of total recovery, hospital costs, and apprehension of patients were analyzed. There was one death in Group I. In this group, the total recovery time was 4.8 months vs 2.4 months for Group II. Hospitalization time was 16.2 days in Group I vs 8.2 days in Group II. The hospital costs were significantly higher in Group I with an average of $58,950 vs $46,553 in Group II. No deaths occurred in Group II. It is recommended that if a patient with severe coronary disease requiring surgery also presents with an AAA of more than 5 cm, he/she should have both conditions operated on in one session rather than staggering the procedures. It saves time, cost, anxiety, and is well tolerated.Presented at the 38th Annual World Congress, International College of Angiology, Köln, Germany, June 1996.     

Surgical techniques. Thoracoabdominal aorta

Patients presenting with impending rupture of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm require emergency operative repair. To prevent rupture and its associated mortality, elective repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms exceeding 5.5 cm to 6.0 cm in diameter is recommended in patients with adequate physiologic reserve. Similarly, surgery should be considered for patients with smaller symptomatic aneurysms. Atypical symptoms have been associated with rupture, therefore, they require thorough evaluation. Whether the aortic conditions are caused by medial degenerative disease or chronic aortic dissection, surgical techniques allow for graft repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with low mortality and morbidity rates. Although surgery is usually avoided in patients with acute distal aortic dissection, operative intervention is occasionally required when complications develop. Patients with acute aortic dissection complicated by impending rupture of the thoracoabdominal segment require graft repair to restore aortic integrity; although the mortality rate is acceptable, the incidence of postoperative paraplegia approaches 20% in this setting. For patients presenting with ischemic complications of acute distal aortic dissection, less-extensive surgical options have been effective in restoring perfusion. In experienced centers, overall operative survival rate following thoracoabdominal aortic surgery can exceed 92%. Retrospective data suggest that left heart bypass reduces the incidence of paraplegia following extensive thoracoabdominal aortic repairs. Although recent advances have led to improved outcomes, paraplegia continues to occur regardless of the strategy used. The prevention of spinal cord ischemia during thoracoabdominal aortic surgery, therefore, will remain a focus of controversy and investigation, just as it was more than 4 decades ago.     

Isolated internal iliac artery aneurysm eleven years after tube graft repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Case report and literature review

Internal iliac artery (hypogastric) aneurysms are most commonly associated with common iliac or other arterial aneurysms. Isolated internal iliac aneurysms are quite rare and represent about 1/2% of intracorporal aneurysms. The occurrence of an isolated internal iliac artery aneurysm many years after repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, and its successful surgical management have not been previously reported. An 84-year-old Caucasian male presented with acute left femoro-popliteal deep vein thrombosis 11 years after repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm with insertion of a knitted Dacron tube graft. In the course of his workup he was found to have an isolated 5-cm right, hypogastric, arterial aneurysm. After treating the patient for this deep vein thrombosis, the internal iliac artery aneurysm was repaired via a transperitoneal approach, using the technique of obliterative endoaneurysmorrhaphy. The natural history, diagnosis, and options for treatment modalities of isolated internal iliac arterial aneurysms are presented with a review of the literature.Presented at the 38th Annual World Congress, International College of Angiology, Cologne, Germany, June 1996