Pharmacodynamics of piperacillin alone and in combination with tazobactam against piperacillin-resistant and -susceptible organisms in an in vitro model of infection.

The pharmacodynamics of dosage regimens of piperacillin alone or in combination with tazobactam against piperacillin-resistant or -susceptible bacteria were studied in an in vitro model of infection. Experiments were conducted by using a fixed daily exposure of 12 g of piperacillin, given as 3 g alone or in combination with tazobactam at 0.375 g every 6 h, or the same total dose of the combination given as 4 g of piperacillin plus 0.5 g of tazobactam every 8 h. The addition of tazobactam to piperacillin, irrespective of the dosing interval, did not alter the killing of piperacillin-susceptible organisms (Escherichia coli J53 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853). In contrast, experiments with an isogenic TEM-3-containing transconjugant of E. coli J53 (E. coli J53.2-TEM-3) that was resistant to piperacillin (MIC, 128 micrograms/ml) showed that the addition of tazobactam resulted in bacterial killing similar to that observed with the wild-type strain. Although tazobactam concentrations fell to less than 4 mg/liter (the concentration associated with a reduction in the piperacillin MIC from 128 to 2 mg/liter) 2 to 3 h after a dose, a similar degree of bacterial killing was observed when the same total 24-h dose of piperacillin-tazobactam was fractionated into dosing intervals of every 6 or 8 h. Investigations with Staphylococcus aureus 7176 (piperacillin MIC, 128 micrograms/ml) showed that the addition of tazobactam, again irrespective of dosing interval, also resulted in net bacterial killing which was not seen with piperacillin alone. These data support the use of extended dosing intervals (every 8 h) of piperacillin-tazobactam in the treatment of infections caused by piperacillin-resistant bacteria.     

Comparative in vitro activities of piperacillin-tazobactam and ticarcillin-clavulanate.

The in vitro activities of ticarcillin, piperacillin, clavulanic acid, tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, and piperacillin-tazobactam against 819 bacterial isolates were compared. The two beta-lactamase inhibitors, clavulanic acid and tazobactam, had little useful antibacterial activity but enhanced the activities of the penicillins against beta-lactamase-producing strains of Haemophilus influenzae, Branhamella catarrhalis, and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus; all strains were susceptible to both combinations. Both enzyme inhibitors also enhanced the activities of the penicillins against most strains of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Citrobacter diversus, Proteus spp., Providencia spp., and Bacteroides spp. and against occasional strains of Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter spp., and Serratia marcescens. Clavulanic acid frequently enhanced the activity of ticarcillin against Xanthomonas maltophilia, and tazobactam frequently enhanced the activity of piperacillin against Morganella morganii. Enhancement was observed primarily with strains relatively resistant to the penicillins. In general, clavulanic acid was more effective than tazobactam in enhancing penicillin activity against Klebsiella spp., C. diversus, X. maltophilia, and Bacteroides spp., whereas tazobactam was more effective against Escherichia coli and Proteeae. There was little or no enhancement of activity against Enterococcus faecalis, Aeromonas hydrophila, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas cepacia, or Acinetobacter anitratus. Clavulanic acid occasionally antagonized the activity of ticarcillin against ticarcillin-susceptible members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, but those strains were still considered susceptible to the combination. Tazobactam never antagonized the activity of piperacillin. In a direct comparison of the activities of ticarcillin-clavulanate and piperacillin-tazobactam, the two were equally active against H. influenzae, B. catarrhalis, and S. aureus; the latter was more active against E. faecalis. For relatively susceptible strains of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, neither combination was predictably more active than the other, but relatively resistant strains were generally more susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam. Piperacillin-tazobactam was more active than ticarcillin-clavulanate against A. hydrophila, P. aeruginosa, and P. cepacia, similar in activity against A. anitratus, and less active against X. maltophilia and Bacteroides spp.     

In vitro activities of the beta-lactamase inhibitors clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam alone or in combination with beta-lactams against epidemiologically characterized multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains

Acinetobacter baumannii is an important nosocomial pathogen usually in the context of serious underlying disease. Multidrug resistance in these organisms is frequent. The beta-lactamase inhibitors clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam have intrinsic activity against Acinetobacter strains. To evaluate their potential therapeutic usefulness, we determined the in vitro activity of ampicillin, sulbactam, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoperazone, cefoperazone-sulbactam, piperacillin, piperacillin-sulbactam, tazobactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, amoxicillin, clavulanic acid, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ticarcillin, and ticarcillin-clavulanic acid against multidrug-resistant A. baumannii. All isolates were epidemiologically characterized by RAPD [random(ly) amplified polymorphic DNA] analysis and/or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and represented different strain types, including sporadic strains, as well as outbreak-related strains. The MICs were determined by agar dilution on Mueller-Hinton agar (using fixed concentrations, as well as fixed ratios for beta-lactamase inhibitors) and the E-test. The majority of E-test results were within two dilutions of those recorded by agar dilution, with the exception of piperacillin-tazobactam. Sulbactam was superior to clavulanic acid and tazobactam and may represent an alternative treatment option for infections due to multiresistant A. baumannii strains. beta-Lactamase inhibitors have intrinsic activity but do not enhance activity of beta-lactams against A. baumannii. Testing with the inhibitor added at a fixed concentration as recommended for piperacillin-tazobactam and ticarcillin-clavulanic acid by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards may falsely suggest high activity or gives uninterpretable results due to trailing. If combinations are used for testing, fixed ratios may give more useful results.     

Penetration of piperacillin-tazobactam into bronchial secretions after multiple doses to intensive care patients.

The penetration of piperacillin-tazobactam in eight mechanically ventilated intensive care patients (age, 56.0 +/- 12.2 years, and weight, 76.5 +/- 15.2 kg [means +/- standard deviations]) with bacterial pneumonia was investigated. They were given intravenous doses of piperacillin (4 g) and tazobactam (0.5 g) as 30-min infusions every 6 h. The kinetic study was performed after the fourth dose on day 2 of treatment. Samples of blood and bronchial secretions (BS) were collected before the fourth dosing and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after the end of infusion. Drug concentrations in both sera and BS were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Concentrations (in micrograms per milliliter) in serum were 184.80 +/- 63.03 and 40.03 +/- 30.79 for piperacillin and 23.05 +/- 7.53 and 4.86 +/- 4.54 for tazobactam at 0.5 and 6 h, respectively, after the end of infusion. The corresponding concentrations (in micrograms per milliliter) in BS were 29.33 +/- 25.08 and 20.25 +/- 19.11 for piperacillin and 6.86 +/- 4.25 and 4.25 +/- 2.78 for tazobactam. The percentages for the extent of penetration of piperacillin and tazobactam, as defined by the BS/serum area under the curve ratio, were 35.70 and 78.42%, respectively. These data indicate good penetration of both piperacillin and tazobactam into BS. The concentrations of tazobactam in BS are persistent and high enough to exceed the values found to be effective in vitro against the tazobactam-susceptible beta-lactamases produced by the most important pathogens responsible for nosocomial pneumonia.     

In vitro pharmacodynamics of piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ciprofloxacin alone and in combination against Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

The time-kill curve methodology was used to determine the pharmacodynamics of piperacillin, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam and the combinations piperacillin-ciprofloxacin and ciprofloxacin-piperacillin-tazobactam. Kill curve studies were performed for piperacillin, ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin-tazobactam at concentrations of 0.25 to 50 times the MICs for 13 strains of bacteria: four Pseudomonas aeruginosa, three Enterobacter cloacae, three Klebsiella pneumoniae, and three Staphylococcus aureus isolates (tazobactam concentrations of 0.5, 4, and 12 micrograms/ml). By using a sigmoid Emax model and nonlinear least squares regression, the 50% lethal concentrations and the maximum lethal rates of each agent were determined for each bacterial strain. For piperacillin-ciprofloxacin and ciprofloxacin-piperacillin-tazobactam, kill curve studies were performed with concentrations obtained by the fractional maximal effect method (R. C. Li, J. J. Schentag, and D. E. Nix, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:523-531, 1993) and from individual 50% lethal concentrations and maximum lethal rates. Ciprofloxacin-piperacillin-tazobactam was evaluated only against the four P. aeruginosa strains. Interactions between piperacillin and ciprofloxacin were generally additive. At physiologically relevant concentrations of piperacillin and ciprofloxacin, ciprofloxacin had the highest rates of killing against K. pneumoniae. Piperacillin-tazobactam (12 micrograms/ml) had the highest rate of killing against E. cloacae. Piperacillin-ciprofloxacin with relatively higher ciprofloxacin concentrations had the greatest killing rates against S. aureus. This combination had significantly higher killing rates than piperacillin (P < 0.002). For all the bacterial strains tested, killing rates by ciprofloxacin were significantly higher than those by piperacillin-tazobactam (4 and 12 micrograms/ml had significantly higher killing rates than piperacillin alone (P < 0.02 and P < 0.004, respectively). The effect of the combination of piperacillin-ciprofloxacin, in which piperacillin concentrations were relatively higher, was not statistically different from that of piperacillin alone (p > or = 0.71). The combination of ciprofloxacin-piperacillin-tazobactam achieved greater killing than other combinations or monotherapies against P. aeruginosa. The reduction in the initial inoculum was 1 to 4 logs greater with ciprofloxacin-piperacillin-tazobactam at 4 and 12 micrograms/ml than with any other agent or combination of agents. On the basis of the additive effects prevalently demonstrated in the in vitro study, the combinations of piperacillin-ciprofloxacin and piperacillin-tazobactam are rational therapeutic options. Greater killing of P. aeruginosa was demonstrated with ciprofloxacin-piperacillin--tazobactam. Since treatment failure of P. aeruginosa pneumonia is a significant problem, clinical studies are warranted.     

In vitro activities of beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: correlation between methods for testing inhibitory activity, time-kill curves, and bactericidal activity.

The activities of ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, aztreonam, and aztreonam-clavulanic against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains for which the MICs of penicillins and commercially available beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations were higher than the breakpoints usually recommended for Pseudomonas aeruginosa in commercially available broth microdilution methods were tested by the agar diffusion, agar dilution, and broth microdilution methods. Time-kill curve studies were performed when discrepancies between these methods were observed. The MICs obtained by the commercially available broth microdilution method, the agar dilution method, and the broth microdilution method were almost identical. Twenty-five percent of the strains tested showed inhibition diameters of > or =15 mm for ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, and 43.7% of the strains tested showed inhibition diameters of > or =18 mm for piperacillin-tazobactam by the agar diffusion method. The time-kill curves for these strains confirmed the results obtained by dilution methods. Aztreonam-clavulanic acid (2:1) at concentrations of < or =16 microg/ml inhibited all of these strains (MIC range, 1 to 16 microg/ml). The time-kill curves confirmed this activity. The addition of piperacillin to this combination did not modify the MICs. The combination aztreonam-clavulanic acid-ticarcillin was two- to fourfold more active than aztreonam-clavulanic acid alone. We studied the inhibitory and bactericidal activities of the two most active combinations (aztreonam-clavulanic acid and aztreonam-clavulanic acid-ticarcillin) against the standard inoculum and 10 and 50 times the standard inoculum. Inoculum modifications did not modify the MICs. Both combinations showed good bactericidal activity against the standard inoculum. With 10 times the standard inoculum, minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) results were heterogeneous (for 55% of the strains, MBCs were between the MIC and 4-fold the MIC, and for 45% of the strains MBCs were between 8- and >32-fold the MIC). With 50 times the standard inoculum, MBCs were at least 32-fold the MICs for all the strains tested.     

Assessment of biliary excretion of piperacillin-tazobactam in humans.

Piperacillin-tazobactam concentrations in serum and bile were measured intraoperatively in 10 patients undergoing cholecystectomy (group 1) and 5 cholecystectomized patients provided with external bile duct drainage (group 2). Each patient received a single intravenous dose of piperacillin at 4 g plus tazobactam at 0.5 g over 30 min. Drug concentrations in both serum and bile were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. In group 1 patients, serum and bile specimens and gallbladder wall fragments were collected at mean times of 70 and 83 min postinfusion, respectively. The mean concentrations of piperacillin and tazobactam were, respectively, 69.1 +/- 41.5 (standard deviation) and 9.9 +/- 5.1 microg/ml in serum, 630.4 microg/ml (range, 24.8 to 1,194 microg/ml) and 11.8 microg/ml (range, 3.6 to 22 microg/ml) in choledochal bile, 342.3 microg/ml (range, 1.1 to 1,149 microg/ml) and 7.7 microg/ml, (range, 0.2 to 23.1 microg/ml) in gallbladder bile, and 49.3 microg/g (range, 9.7 to 223 microg/g) and 2.9 microg/g (range, 0.1 to 5.9 microg/g) in the gallbladder wall. In group 2 patients, the amounts of drugs recovered in bile drainage obtained over 12 h were 28.4 +/- 18.0 and 1.0 +/- 0.5 mg for piperacillin and tazobactam, respectively. Peak piperacillin and tazobactam concentrations in bile reached 358 +/- 242 and 10.8 +/- 4.2 microg/ml, respectively. Comparison of drug levels in serum and bile suggests an underlying active secretion process for piperacillin elimination into the bile, unlike that of tazobactam. From a therapeutic viewpoint, given the concentrations of tazobactam recorded in bile fluid and tissue, the addition of this beta-lactamase inhibitor to piperacillin therapy might be of interest in the management of biliary tract infections, mostly in patients at risk of mixed aerobic-anaerobic infections due to beta-lactamase-producing organisms.     

Serum bactericidal activity of piperacillin/tazobactam against Staphylococcus aureus, piperacillin-susceptible and piperacillin-resistant Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

BACKGROUND: The serum bactericidal test measures the highest level of an antibiotic-containing serum dilution at which 99.9% of bacteria are killed. In this study the serum bactericidal activity of piperacillin/tazobactam was determined for bacteria often involved in severe infections. In earlier studies titres >/=1:8 in the serum bactericidal tests correlated well with clinical success in the treatment of endocarditis and osteomyelitis as well as bacterial eradication. METHODS: Blood samples of 6 healthy volunteers were taken before and 1 and 4 h after piperacillin/tazobactam (4.5 g) administration. Serum concentrations and serum bactericidal activity were determined for 10 strains each of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli, both piperacillin-resistant and piperacillin-susceptible according to NCCLS guidelines. RESULTS: 100% of S. aureus and piperacillin-susceptible E. coli, 90% of piperacillin-resistant E. coli and 80% of P. aeruginosa were killed 1 h after drug administration. 4 h after drug administration serum bactericidal activity decreased to 60% for S. aureus, 90% for piperacillin-susceptible E. coli, 80% for piperacillin-resistant E. coli and 30% for P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent serum bactericidal activity of piperacillin/tazobactam was recorded 1 h after drug administration for S. aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa. After 4 h limited killing rates for P. aeruginosa could be detected, which supports the idea of a combination therapy.     

Comparative in vitro and in vivo activities of piperacillin combined with the beta-lactamase inhibitors tazobactam, clavulanic acid, and sulbactam.

Tazobactam (YTR-830H), a novel beta-lactamase inhibitor, was compared with clavulanic acid and sulbactam for enhancement of the activity of piperacillin against beta-lactamase-producing, piperacillin-resistant clinical isolates. Piperacillin MICs were determined in media containing a fixed concentration of 2 or 4 micrograms of the inhibitors per ml. The higher concentration was generally more effective. Tazobactam was superior to sulbactam in enhancing the spectrum and potency of piperacillin. Although the calvulanic acid combination was more potent, tazobactam was effective for a similar spectrum of resistant gram-negative clinical isolates containing beta-lactamase. MICs were reduced to the susceptible range for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus spp., Salmonella spp., and Shigella spp. Combinations with tazobactam and sulbactam, but not clavulanic acid, were effective against Morganella spp. Some antagonism of the activity of piperacillin was observed with clavulanic acid but not with tazobactam or sulbactam. The inhibitors were similarly effective with piperacillin against beta-lactamase-positive Staphylococcus spp. and the Bacteroides fragilis group. Piperacillin-tazobactam was more effective against a broader spectrum of gram-negative enteric bacteria than ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid was. Combinations with tazobactam or clavulanic acid had a broader spectrum of activity than combinations with sulbactam against bacteria that produce characterized plasmid-mediated enzymes of clinical significance. In particular, piperacillin with tazobactam or clavulanic acid, but not with sulbactam, inhibited TEM-1, TEM-2, and SHV-1 enzymes. In vitro activity was reflected in vivo. Tazobactam and clavulanic acid were superior to sulbactam in enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of piperacillin in mice infected with beta-lactamase-positive E. coli, K. pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, and Staphylococcus aureus. Only combinations with tazobactam and sulbactam were effective against the Morganella infection. Tazobactam has a good potential for enhancing the clinical efficacy of piperacillin.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam when administered by continuous infusion and intermittent dosing

BACKGROUND: Although intermittent bolus dosing is currently the standard of practice for many antimicrobial agents, beta-lactams exhibit time-dependent bacterial killing. Maximizing the time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for a pathogen is the best pharmacodynamic predictor of efficacy. Use of a continuous infusion has been advocated for maximizing the time above the MIC compared with intermittent bolus dosing. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam when administered as an intermittent bolus versus a continuous infusion against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive piperacillin 3 g/ tazobactam 0.375 g q6h for 24 hours, piperacillin 6 g/tazobactam 0.75 g continuous infusion over 24 hours, and piperacillin 12 g/tazobactam 1.5 g continuous infusion over 24 hours. Five clinical isolates each of P aeruginosa and K pneumoniae were used for pharmacodynamic analyses. RESULTS: Eleven healthy subjects (7 men, 4 women; mean +/- SD age, 28 +/- 4.7 years) were enrolled. Mean steady-state serum concentrations of piperacillin were 16.0 +/- 5.0 and 37.2 +/- 6.8 microg/mL with piperacillin 6 and 12 g, respectively. Piperacillin/tazobactam 13.5 g continuous infusion (piperacillin 12 g/tazobactam 1.5 g) was significantly more likely to produce a serum inhibitory titer > or = 1:2 against P aeruginosa at 24 hours than either the 6.75 g continuous infusion (piperacillin 6 g/tazobactam 0.75 g) or 3.375 g q6h (piperacillin 3 g/ tazobactam 0.375 g). There were no statistical differences against K pneumoniae between regimens. The median area under the inhibitory activity-time curve (AUIC) for the 13.5 g continuous infusion was higher than that for 3.375 g q6h and the 6.75 g continuous infusion against both P aeruginosa and Kpneumoniae (P < or = 0.007, 13.5 g continuous infusion and 3.375 g q6h vs 6.75 g continuous infusion against K pneumoniae). The percentage of subjects with an AUIC > or = 125 was higher with both 3.375 g q6h and the 13.5 g continuous infusion than with the 6.75 g continuous infusion against P aeruginosa and K pneumoniae (both, P < 0.001 vs 6.75 g continuous infusion against K pneumoniae). CONCLUSIONS: Piperacillin 12 g/tazobactam 1.5 g continuous infusion consistently resulted in serum concentrations above the breakpoint for Enterobacteriaceae and many of the susceptible strains of P aeruginosa in this study in 11 healthy subjects. Randomized controlled clinical trials are warranted to determine the appropriate dose of piperacillin/tazobactam.     

Comparative activities of piperacillin and tazobactam against clinical isolates of Legionella spp.

We evaluated the in vitro activity of piperacillin alone or in combination with the beta-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam against clinical isolates of Legionella species. At an inoculum of approximately 10(4) CFU, tazobactam, piperacillin, and the 8:1 combination had equivalent activities against Legionella spp. At an approximately 10-fold higher inoculum, the following results were obtained, expressed as MICs for 50 and 90% of strains tested (MIC range): piperacillin, 4 and 16 (0.25 to 32) micrograms/ml; tazobactam, 0.5 and 1 (0.125 to 2) micrograms/ml; and piperacillin-tazobactam (expressed in terms of MIC of piperacillin) 0.5 and 1 (0.03 to 2) micrograms/ml. Tazobactam alone and the combination with piperacillin were more active than piperacillin alone at the higher inoculum.     

Antibacterial activity of piperacillin and tazobactam against beta-lactamase-producing clinical isolates

The effectiveness of a combination of the recently developed penam sulphone tazobactam with piperacillin was studied in clinical isolates with defined beta-lactamase production. The combination was highly effective against piperacillin-resistant beta-lactamase-producing Staphylococcus aureus, TEM-1-producing Escherichia coli and Proteus vulgaris isolates. It was less effective against E. coli isolates producing the OXA-1 enzyme and marginally active against TEM-1-producing Klebsiella spp. isolates. The presence of tazobactam at a concentration of 10 mg/l markedly reduced the minimal inhibitory concentrations for piperacillin in most of the beta-lactamase-derepressed Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens and Citrobacter freundii isolates; however, this synergism was much less pronounced in beta-lactamase-derepressed Klebsiella spp. isolates. The selection frequency of resistant clones from clinical E. cloacae and C. freundii isolates could be markedly reduced by the addition of 10 mg/l tazobactam to the piperacillin-containing selective medium. Resistant clones could be obtained only from part of the wild-type strains at 2 or 4 times the MIC of piperacillin in the presence of tazobactam, whereas resistant clones could be selected up to 64 times the MIC of piperacillin without the addition of tazobactam. This aspect deserves attention with respect to the rapid selection of beta-lactamase-derepressed clones from nosocomial pathogens.     

Elimination of the piperacillin/tazobactam combination during continuous venovenous haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration in patients with acute renal failure.

The elimination of the piperacillin/tazobactam combination was studied in six patients with acute renal failure undergoing either continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH) or continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) at 1 L/h and 2 L/h for 12 h. Piperacillin 4 g/tazobactam 0.5 g was given iv on three successive treatment periods and their concentrations in plasma, ultrafiltrate/dialysate and urine were determined for 12 h after each dose. The elimination half-life of piperacillin during CVVH (7.7 +/- 2.3 h; mean +/- s.d.) was significantly longer than during CVVHDF 1 L/h (6.7 +/- 1.9 h) or 2 L/h (6.1 +/- 2.0 h) (P< 0.05). Corresponding values for tazobactam were 13.9 +/- 3.9, 11.6 +/- 3.3 and 9.4 +/- 2.4 h, respectively (P< 0.05). Total piperacillin clearance during CVVH (3.89 +/- 1.23 L/h) was significantly lower than during CVVHDF 1 L/h (5.06 +/- 1.68 L/h) or 2 L/h (5.48 +/- 2.11 L/h) (P< 0.05). The corresponding tazobactam clearance values were 2.42 +/- 0.75, 3.13 +/- 0.66 and 3.75 +/- 1.43 L/h, respectively. The mean 12 h elimination of piperacillin and tazobactam in ultrafiltrate/dialysate was 29% and 37% during CVVH, 42% and 57% during CVVHDF (1 L/h), and 46% and 69% during CVVHDF (2 L/h). We recommend 8 hourly dosing of patients with renal failure on CVVH or CVVHDF with dialysis flow rates of 1 or 2 L/h treated with piperacillin 4 g/tazobactam 0.5 g.     

Importance of beta-lactamase inhibitor pharmacokinetics in the pharmacodynamics of inhibitor-drug combinations: studies with piperacillin-tazobactam and piperacillin-sulbactam.

An in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used to study the pharmacodynamics of piperacillin-tazobactam and piperacillin-sulbactam against gram-negative bacilli producing plasmid-encoded beta-lactamases. Logarithmic-phase cultures were exposed to peak antibiotic concentrations observed in human serum after the administration of intravenous doses of 3 g of piperacillin and 0.375 g of tazobactam or 0.5 g of sulbactam. Piperacillin and inhibitor were either dosed simultaneously or piperacillin was dosed sequentially 0.5 h after dosing with the inhibitor. In studies with all four test strains, the pharmacodynamics observed after simultaneous dosing were similar to those observed with the sequential regimen. Since the ratio between piperacillin and tazobactam was in constant fluctuation after sequential dosing, these data suggest that the pharmacodynamics of the piperacillin-inhibitor combinations were not dependent upon maintenance of a critical ratio between the components. Furthermore, when regrowth was observed, the time at which bacterial counts began to increase was similar between the simultaneous and sequential dosing regimens. Since the pharmacokinetics of the inhibitors were the same for all regimens, these data suggest that the length of time that the antibacterial activity was maintained over the dosing interval with these combinations was dictated by the pharmacokinetics of the beta-lactamase inhibitor in the combination. The antibacterial activity of the combination appeared to be lost when the amount of inhibitor available fell below some critical concentration. This critical concentration varied depending upon the type and amount of enzyme produced, as well as the specific inhibitor used. These results indicate that the antibacterial activity of drug-inhibitor combinations, when dosed at their currently recommended ratios, is more dependent on the pharmacokinetics of the inhibitor than on those of the beta-lactam drug.     

Pharmacodynamic study of beta-lactams alone and in combination with beta-lactamase inhibitors against Pseudomonas aeruginosa possessing an inducible beta-lactamase

OBJECTIVES: The antimicrobial efficacies of beta-lactams alone and in combination with beta-lactamase inhibitors were investigated by applying a rabbit tissue cage model against a strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with an inducible AmpC (iAmpC) beta-lactamase. METHODS: Two sterilized golf Wiffle balls were surgically implanted in the rabbit dorsal cervical area. After 4 weeks, Wiffle balls had filled with tissue cage fluid (TCF), in which 2 mL of 10(6) cfu/mL of the test isolate were inoculated. To achieve the same T > MIC as in humans, 400 mg/kg of the beta-lactams alone and in combination was administered twice a day via subcutaneous injection. The dosing regimens were as follows: piperacillin alone, 4 g piperacillin/0.5 g tazobactam; ticarcillin alone, 3 g ticarcillin/0.1 g clavulanate; and 3 g ticarcillin/ 0.3 g clavulanate. RESULTS: The changes in bacterial counts (log cfu/mL) after the 3 day treatments were as follows: 1.03 +/- 0.97 (control), -1.31 +/- 0.61 (piperacillin), -2.81 +/- 0.53 (4 g piperacillin/0.5 g tazobactam), -1.61 +/- 0.68 (ticarcillin), -3.42 +/- 0.75 (3 g ticarcillin/0.1 g clavulanate) and -1.65 +/- 1.47 log cfu/mL (3 g ticarcillin/0.3 g clavulanate). AmpC induction by high-dose clavulanate was observed in rabbit TCF, and was confirmed by the in vitro induction study. CONCLUSIONS: The study indicated that tazobactam significantly enhanced the antibacterial activity of piperacillin against iAmpC P. aeruginosa; clavulanate had synergy with the antibacterial activity of ticarcillin at low concentration, but had no effect on ticarcillin at high concentration due to AmpC induction by clavulanate.     

Comparative Activities of Clinafloxacin against Gram-Positive and -Negative Bacteria

Activities of clinafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, trovafloxacin, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ceftazidime, and imipenem against 354 ciprofloxacin-susceptible and -intermediate-resistant organisms were tested by agar dilution. Clinafloxacin yielded the lowest quinolone MICs (≤0.5 μg/ml against ciprofloxacin-susceptible organisms and ≤16.0 μg/ml against ciprofloxacin-intermediate-resistant organisms) compared to those of levofloxacin, trovafloxacin, and sparfloxacin. Ceftazidime, piperacillin alone or combined with tazobactam, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and imipenem usually yielded higher MICs against ciprofloxacin-resistant strains.     

In vitro activity of cefepime, a new parenteral cephalosporin, against recent European blood isolates and in comparison with piperacillin/tazobactam

Cefepime, a new parenteral cephalosporin with broad antibacterial spectrum and stability to the hydrolysis to many bacterial beta-lactamases, was tested against recent blood culture isolates (369 strains of gram-negative bacilli and 131 strains of staphylococci) collected in 29 European laboratories by the microdilution method in Mueller-Hinton broth. Cefepime was very active against the gram-negative bacilli (MIC50 less than or equal to 0.016-0.064 mg/l; MIC90 0.064-4 mg/l) and less active against Pseudomonas (MIC50 4 mg/l; MIC90 greater than 16 mg/l) or Acinetobacter (MIC50 and MIC90 greater than 16 mg/l). The staphylococci were also inhibited (MIC50 8 mg/l; MIC90 16 mg/l). Cefepime was very active against bacteria producing different plasmid-encoded beta-lactamases (MIC 0.016-0.5 mg/l). Piperacillin was not active against the latter strains (MIC from 2 to greater than 64 mg/l), but the presence of the beta-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam restored the activity of piperacillin. The bactericidal activity of cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam against beta-lactamase-producing strains was confirmed by the killing curve technique.     

Interactions of tazobactam and clavulanate with inducibly- and constitutively-expressed Class I beta-lactamases

Clavulanate and tazobactam (YTR 830) were tested as inhibitors and inducers of the AmpC-type Class I beta-lactamases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii, Serratia marcescens, Morganella morganii and the Ic beta-lactamase of Proteus vulgaris. Both clavulanate and tazobactam inhibited the Pr. vulgaris Class Ic beta-lactamase and potentiated ticarcillin and piperacillin against beta-lactamase derepressed variants of this species. Tazobactam, but not clavulanate, also had some ability to inhibit the AmpC Class I enzymes of M. morganii, C. freundii, Ps. aeruginosa, E. cloacae and S. marcescens. The piperacillin + tazobactam combination, unlike ticarcillin + clavulanate, showed some degree of synergy against most derepressed strains of these species. This behaviour partly depended upon the greater inhibitory activity of tazobactam for the enzymes, but also on piperacillin being easier to potentiate than ticarcillin. The synergy between piperacillin and tazobactam was greatest for M. morganii and C. freundii, least for Ps. aeruginosa and E. cloacae. Unfortunately, it is in the last two species that these enzymes pose the greatest resistance threat. Tazobactam caused little or no antagonism of piperacillin against beta-lactamase inducible species, whereas clavulanate antagonized ticarcillin against beta-lactamase inducible strains of E. cloacae and M. morganii (not other species). The antagonism of ticarcillin was attributable to beta-lactamase induction. The lack of antagonism with the tazobactam+piperacillin combination was related to tazobactam being a weaker inducer than clavulanate, not to piperacillin being less susceptible to antagonism than ticarcillin.     

Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of tazobactam and piperacillin in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

The pharmacokinetics of tazobactam and piperacillin in plasma and different tissues after a 30-min intravenous infusion of 4 g of piperacillin and 0.5 g of tazobactam were investigated in 18 patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery. Serial blood samples were collected for up to 6 h after the initiation of the infusion. The types of tissue collected were fatty tissue, muscle, skin, appendix, and intestinal mucosa (proximal and distal). On the basis of concentrations in plasma, the following pharmacokinetic parameter values were obtained (values are means +/- standard deviations): maximum concentration of drug in serum, tazobactam, 27.9 +/- 7.67 micrograms/ml; piperacillin, 259 +/- 81.8 micrograms/ml; time to maximum concentration of drug in serum, tazobactam, 0.51 +/- 0.03 h; piperacillin, 0.51 +/- 0.03 h; area under the concentration-time curve, tazobactam, 47.6 +/- 13.3 micrograms.h/ml; piperacillin, 361 +/- 80.3 micrograms.h/ml; clearance, tazobactam, 188 +/- 52.3 ml/min; piperacillin, 194 +/- 42.9 ml/min; half-life, tazobactam, 1.42 +/- 0.32 h; piperacillin, 1.27 +/- 0.24 h; apparent volume of distribution, tazobactam, 0.31 +/- 0.07 liter/kg of body weight; piperacillin, 0.29 +/- 0.06 liter/kg; volume of distribution at steady state, tazobactam, 0.28 +/- 0.04 liter/kg; piperacillin, 0.25 +/- 0.05 liter/kg. The concentrations of tazobactam and piperacillin in fatty tissue and muscle tissue were 10 to 13 and 18 to 30% of the levels in plasma, respectively. In skin, the concentrations of piperacillin were 60 to 95% of the levels in plasma, whereas the concentrations of tazobactam in plasma were 49 to 93% of the levels in skin tissue. The mean concentration of tazobactam in the investigated gastrointestinal tissues (appendix, proximal and distal mucosa) exceeded levels in plasma after 1 h, while piperacillin showed a mean penetration into these tissues of 43 and 53%. The mechanisms that can be used to explain the extent of penetration of piperacillin and tazobactam are discussed. Simple diffusion may take place in fatty and muscle tissue, while penetration into skin and gastrointestinal tissue is governed by more complex mechanisms which lead to differences in penetration between piperacillin and tazobactam. For all tissues investigated (except fatty tissue), the time course of the concentrations of both compounds was similar, with a peak in concentration at between 1 and 2 h after the start of infusion followed by a decline of concentrations that were almost parallel to the curves of the drug concentrations in plasma. In plasma and in all investigated tissues, piperacillin as well as tazobactam reached or exceeded the concentrations found to be effective in vitro.     

Bactericidal activity of DU-6859a compared to activities of three quinolones, three beta-lactams, clindamycin, and metronidazole against anaerobes as determined by time-kill methodology.

The activities of DU-6859a, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, clindamycin, and metronidazole against 11 anaerobes were tested by the broth microdilution and time-kill methods. DU-6859a was the most active drug tested (broth microdilution MICs, 0.06 to 0.5 microg/ml), followed by imipenem (MICs, 0.002 to 4.0 microg/ml). Broth macrodilution MICs were within 3 (but usually 1) dilutions of the broth microdilution MICs. All compounds were bactericidal at the MIC after 48 h; after 24 h, 90% killing was shown for all strains when the compounds were used at four times the MIC. DU-6859a at < or = 0.5 microg/ml was bactericidal after 48 h.