Mental health treatment received by primary care patients with posttraumatic stress disorder

BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is receiving growing attention as a pervasive and impairing disorder but is still undertreated. Our purpose was to describe the characteristics of mental health treatment received by primary care patients diagnosed with PTSD. METHOD: 4383 patients from 15 primary care, family practice, or internal medicine clinics were screened for anxiety symptoms using a self-report questionnaire developed for the study. Those found positive for anxiety symptoms (N = 539) were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. Of these patients, 197 met diagnostic criteria for PTSD and were examined in the present study regarding the rates and types of mental health treatment they were currently receiving. Data were gathered from July 1997 to May 2001. RESULTS: Nearly half (48%) of the patients in general medical practice with PTSD were receiving no mental health treatment at the time of intake to the study. Of those receiving treatment, psychopharmacologic interventions were most common. Few patients were receiving empirically supported psychosocial interventions. Current comorbid major depressive disorder and current comorbid panic disorder with agoraphobia were significantly associated with receiving mental health treatment (major depressive disorder, p <.10; panic disorder with agoraphobia, p <.05). The most common reason patients gave for not receiving medication was the failure of physicians to recommend such treatment, which was also among the most common reasons for not receiving psychosocial treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the morbidity, psychosocial impairment, and distress associated with PTSD, substantial proportions of primary care patients with the disorder are going untreated or are receiving inadequate treatment. Results suggest a need for better identification and treatment of PTSD in the primary care setting.     

Mental health in older adult recipients of primary care services: is depression the key issue? Identification,treatment and the general practitioner

OBJECTIVES: Mental health services for older people in primary care are relatively underdeveloped. This study has sought to determine the nature and extent of mental health problems in older people presenting to primary care and to compare this with the detection and management of mental health problems by the primary health care team (PHCT). METHOD: Participants were patients aged 65 years and above attending a representative inner city general practice. Screening tools included the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). The PHCT used a brief checklist to rate participants for the presence of mental health problems. Follow-up interviews using the Geriatric Mental State (GMSA), Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders in the Elderly (CAMDEX)-cognitive subscale (CAMCOG), National Adult Reading Test (NART), were carried out. RESULTS: A high level of psychological morbidity was identified at screening (48.1%). There was a considerable degree of agreement between the HADS and GMSA, and the MMSE and GMSA at follow-up. Agreement rates between the PHCT and initial screening tools were low suggesting under-recognition of mental health problems at primary care level by the PHCT. Contributory factors included: short consultation times with a concentration on physical symptoms; few patients presenting explicitly with mental health problems; few decisions to treat or refer patients; and the general practitioners tended to monitor, or defer decisions. CONCLUSIONS: This study found lower levels of severe mental health problems, especially depression, than reported elsewhere, but higher prevalence of psychological distress. High levels of physical and mental health co-morbidity were found. These findings suggest that planning for primary care services needs to adopt a flexible assessment model. The development of effective, time-limited protocols and screening tools to assist the PHCT in improving their identification rates is recommended. This needs to be supported by the availability of appropriate treatments for the psychological distress.     

PSYCHIATRIC MORBIDITY AMONG THE ELDERLY IN A PRIMARY CARE SETTING—REPORT FROM A SURVEY IN SÃO PAULO,BRAZIL

Brazil has been experiencing a steady increase in the elderly population during the past few years, and as a result old age health-related problems are increasing continuously in number. Psychiatric symptoms are among the most prevalent health problems of the elderly and are an important source of distress for patients and carers, being also associated with significant growth in the costs and demand for the provision of health care services. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of mental health problems among the elderly attending a regional primary care unit in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. A total of 351 patients older than 60 were assessed during a 6-month period with the SRQ-20 (a scale for the detection of minor psychiatric problems), four questions on psychotic symptoms, AMTS (a scale for the assessment of cognitive functioning) and CAGE (a scale for the assessment of alcoholism); demographic variables were also recorded. Subjects' mean age was 71.22 (CI=70.51–71.92) and 83.5% were female. Thirty-two per cent of subjects were considered ‘cases’ as they scored more than 7 on the SRQ-20 (26.8% of total), or more than 1 on the CAGE (1.4% of total), or at least 1 on the questions assessing psychotic symptoms (12.2% of total). There was a significant excess of women among those found to suffer from psychiatric problems (90.1% vs 80.4%). Cases were also more likely to be illiterate (23.4% vs 12.1%) and to have a lower income (2.21 vs 4.01 minimum wages). Depressive symptoms and tension were highly prevalent (72.9% of subjects). Somatic complaints and signs of inefficient functioning were also common (50.4% and 45.9% respectively). Only five patients answered affirmatively two or more CAGE questions and 12.2% scored at least 1 on the questions assessing psychotic symptoms. Cognitive deficit, as determined by the AMTS, was observed in 13.4% of the sample and was associated with ageing, being illiterate and having higher total SRQ-20 scores. We suggest, that the organization of health care services should take into account the needs of this population, and should also emphasize professional training for the correct assessment and treatment of the most frequent mental health problems in old age. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The prevalence of personality disorders,psychotic disorders and affective disorders amongst the patients seen by a community mental health team in London

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of information regarding the prevalence and co-occurrence of personality disorders, psychotic disorders and affective disorders amongst patients seen by community mental health teams. This study aims to describe the population of patients served by a community mental health team in South London in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. METHOD: Computerised hospital records and keyworkers' caseloads were used to identify 193 patients. The Standardised Assessment of Personality was used to assess personality disorders and the Operationalised Criteria Checklist was used to assess psychotic and affective disorders. RESULTS: Fifty-two per cent of patients met the criteria for one or more personality disorders, 67 % of patients had a psychotic illness and 23 % had a diagnosis of a depressive disorder. Community psychiatric nurses (CPNs) mainly saw patients with psychotic illnesses. The non-psychotic patients seen by CPNs had extremely high rates of personality disorder. Patients seen by psychiatrists and psychologists had significantly lower rates of personality disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of personality disorder is high amongst patients seen by community mental health teams. Possible explanations for this are presented and implications for community care are discussed.     

Social anxiety disorder in primary care

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence, comorbidity, disability and mental health treatment associated with social anxiety disorder (SAD) in primary care, and to determine whether patients with SAD avoid seeking help from their primary care providers. DESIGN: We analyzed data from a health survey conducted on a systematic sample of patients. Data were then cross-linked to the practice's automated database in order to compare primary health care utilization by patients with SAD to that of patients with other psychiatric disorders and well controls. SETTING: Urban primary care practice at a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A systematic sample (n=207) of primary care patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were interviewed by mental health professionals using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Lifetime prevalence of SAD was 5.7%. Substance use disorders were far more common among patients with SAD than patients with other psychiatric disorders (33.3% vs. 3.3%, P=.01). Social anxiety disorder patients were functionally impaired and made fewer primary care visits per year (mean 4.1) compared to patients with other psychiatric disorders (mean 6.9; P=.016) or well controls (mean 6.4; P=.031); 41.7% reported receiving mental health treatment in the past year. CONCLUSION: Patients with SAD made fewer primary care visits compared to patients with other psychiatric disorders and well controls. These results, together with the high prevalence of substance use in SAD, and the finding that less than one half received past year mental health treatment, suggest substantial unmet need for care and are especially important in view of available effective treatments for SAD.     

Dissociative Spectrum Disorders in the Primary Care Setting

Dissociative disorders have a lifetime prevalence of about 10%. Dissociative symptoms may occur in acute stress disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, somatization disorder, substance abuse, trance and possession trance, Ganser's syndrome, and dissociative identity disorder, as well as in mood disorders, psychoses, and personality disorders. Dissociative symptoms and disorders are observed frequently among patients attending our rural South Carolina community mental health center. Given the prevalence of mental illness in primary care settings and the diagnostic difficulties encountered with dissociative disorders, such illness may be undiagnosed or misdiagnosed in primary care settings. We developed an intervention model that may be applicable to primary care settings or helpful to primary care physicians. Key points of the intervention are identification of dissociative symptoms, patient and family education, review of the origin of the symptoms as a method of coping with trauma, and supportive reinforcement of cognitive and relaxation skills during follow-up visits. Symptom recognition, Education of the family, Learning new skills, and Follow-up may be remembered by the mnemonic device SELF. We present several cases to illustrate dissociative symptoms and our intervention. Physicians and other professionals using the 4 steps and behavioral approaches will be able to better recognize and triage patients with dissociative symptoms. Behaviors previously thought to be secondary to psychosis or personality disorders may be seen in a new frame of reference, strengthening the therapeutic alliance while reducing distress and acting-out behaviors.     

Detecting psychological distress among patients attending secondary health care clinics : Self-report and physician rating

A study was conducted to determine the prevalence of psychological distress, as reported by patients and their physicians, in orthopedic, neurology, dermatology, and ophthalmology clinics; to study their accuracy in detecting psychological distress; and to determine if there is any connection among psychological distress, accuracy of detecting distress, and use of mental health and primary health care physicians' prognosis for the somatic complaints. Five hundred and fifty-six patients, ages 18–21, responded to the Psychiatric Epidemiology Research Interview Demoralization Scale (PERI-D), a measure of psychological distress, and to questions about their mental health and use of mental health and primary health services. Physicians, who were blind to patients' responses, were asked to what extent they thought the cause of patients' complaints was physical and to what extent they thought it was psychological in nature, and to prognosticate. Based on the PERI-D, about 25% of patients were distressed, this was less for females than males and varied between clinics. Based on self-reporting, about 14% of patients (males and females) were distressed. Based on physician reporting, about 17% (males less) were distressed. Physicians identified 35% of the PERI-D-distressed cases and 79% of nondistressed cases. About 66% of patients identified their distress and 83% their lack of distress. Increased use of primary health care and mental health care was related to distress. The prognosis was negatively related to distress. Based on this study, there is a need for more attention to psychological distress among secondary health care patients. Patients' ability to identify their distress suggests the importance of involving the patient in the diagnostic process. Correct detection of distress alone does not appear to decrease the use of primary medical and mental health services.     

Diagnostic subtypes of bipolar disorder in older versus younger adults

OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in diagnostic subtypes of bipolar disorder as according to ICD-10 between patients whose first contact with psychiatric health care occurs late in life (over 50 years of age) and patients who have first contact earlier in life (50 years of age or below). METHODS: From 1994 to 2002 all patients who received a diagnosis of a manic episode or bipolar disorder at initial contact with the mental healthcare system, whether outpatient or inpatient, were identified in Denmark's nationwide register. RESULTS: A total of 852 (49.6%) patients, who were over age 50, and 867 patients, who were 50 or below, received a diagnosis of a manic episode or bipolar disorder at the first contact ever. Older inpatients presented with psychotic symptoms (35.4%) significantly less than younger inpatients (42.6%) due specifically to a lower prevalence of manic episodes with psychotic symptoms. Conversely, older inpatients more often presented with severe depressive episodes with psychotic symptoms than younger inpatients (32.0% versus 17.0%). Among outpatients, no significant differences were found between patients older than 50 years and patients 50 years of age or younger. However, a bimodal distribution of age at first outpatient contact was found with an intermode of 65 years and outpatients older than 65 years more often presented with severe depressive episodes with psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar patients who are older at first psychiatric hospitalization (>50 years) present less with psychotic manic episodes and more with severe depressive episodes with psychosis than younger patients. The distribution of age at first outpatient contact is bimodal with an intermode of 65 years and outpatients older than 65 years more often present with severe depressive episodes with psychosis.     

Late-life anxiety disorders among Puerto Rican primary care patients: impact on well-being, functioning, and service utilization

With the growing population of older Hispanic adults there is a need for additional research on the mental health care of this patient group. This study explored the impact of anxiety disorders on the health status of 291 older (>/=50 years) Puerto Rican primary care patients (n = 65 with anxiety disorders, n = 226 without anxiety disorders). All analyses controlled for potential confounding variables, including depression diagnosis and physical health burden. Logistic regression indicated that anxiety disorders were associated with higher psychological distress, suicidality, and emergency room service utilization, as well as lower instrumental functioning and perceived health quality. Analysis of covariance indicated that both anxiety disorder status and history of ataque de nervios were related to higher percentages of lifetime somatic symptoms. These data highlight the need for improved recognition and treatment of anxiety disorders in older Puerto Rican adults.     

The personal impact of schizophrenia in Europe

The personal impact of schizophrenia is poorly described in the scientific literature. The European Psychiatric Services: Inputs Linked to Outcome Domains and Needs (EPSILON) study compared representative treated prevalence cohorts of patients with schizophrenia in five European countries, to assess unmet needs, impact on caregivers, quality of life, satisfaction with services, symptoms and disability. Of the 404 patients, 79% undertook no work of any kind, and 65% were single. Low quality of life was associated with: anxiety, depression, psychotic symptoms, more previous psychiatric admissions, alcohol abuse, having no reliable friends nor daily contact with family, being unemployed, and having few leisure activities. The most frequently occurring unmet needs among the patients were: daytime activities, company and intimate relationships, psychotic symptoms, psychological distress, and information. The most common worries of relatives were about the patient's health, and their own future, safety and financial position. Psychiatric services were therefore largely ineffective in managing the personal impact of schizophrenia, especially upon work, home and family life. Research, clinical practice and disability policy developments need to address a wider range of consequences of the disorder than symptoms alone.     

Effects of medical illness and somatic symptoms on treatment of depression in a family medicine residency practice

The specific aims of this pilot study were to describe the treatment received by depressed patients in a family practice residency setting and to compare treatment modalities and intensity of treatment between patients with and without medical illnesses. A 12-month chart audit of a cohort of 340 patients randomly sampled from a family practice waiting room for a previous study revealed a 1-year period prevalence for diagnosed depression of 10.3% (35 patients). No patient met DSM-III-R criteria for major depressive disorder and yet 57% received tricyclic antidepressant therapy and 60% were eventually referred for specialist mental health care. Tricyclic therapy and follow-up visits for depression were less likely to take place for patients with more severe medical illnesses or high levels of somatic symptoms. These findings suggest that patients in primary care settings may have depressive symptoms severe enough to provoke tricyclic therapy or referral but do not meet current diagnostic criteria. Furthermore, medical illness and somatic symptoms may deleteriously affect treatment in primary care patients. Additional prospective research is needed to determine appropriate criteria for treatment of depressive symptoms in primary care patients and to evaluate the effects of medical illness and somatic symptoms on treatment by primary care physicians.     

Posttraumatic stress disorder in primary care: a hidden diagnosis

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common worldwide, with prevalence rates ranging from 1% to nearly 40%, depending on the population studied. The disability and natural course of PTSD in psychiatric patients have been well characterized. However, even though the primary care setting has been described as the "de facto mental health care system," surprisingly little is known about PTSD in primary care. Available data from primary care clinics in the United States and Israel suggest that PTSD may be as prevalent in this setting as has been reported in large epidemiologic studies. Patients may be unlikely to endorse traumatic experiences or may not consider them related to their current psychological problems. The prevalence of PTSD in primary care may indeed be higher than expected because of underreporting of domestic violence and other histories of trauma. Recognition of PTSD in primary care could be greatly improved if simple trauma histories were integrated into routine medical examinations. Primary care clinicians who maintain a high index of suspicion for PTSD in their patients with positive histories of trauma plus symptoms of depression or anxiety or other signs of psychological distress, suicidal thoughts or actions, alcohol or substance abuse, or excessive health care service utilization may increase the recognition rate of this disorder in their practices.     

Panic disorder in public sector primary care: clinical characteristics and illness severity compared with "mainstream" primary care panic disorder

The prevalence of anxiety disorders is increased among low-income individuals, who are more likely to seek mental health care in medical as opposed to specialty settings because of limited insurance access and restricted availability of public sector mental health resources. However, little is known about the clinical characteristics and illness severity of anxiety disorders in this setting. We studied the clinical characteristics of low-income compared with middle-income primary care panic patients. Clinical, functional, and service use measures obtained at baseline interview in 39 panic disorder patients seen in one public sector medical clinic were compared with 76 patients seen in two middle-income clinics. All patients were participants in a randomized effectiveness pharmacotherapy trial [Roy Byrne et al., Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:869-876]. Public sector patients were more often older, male, single, unemployed, of lower income, and non-Caucasian ethnicity. They had more severe clinical symptoms, more medical comorbidity, worse physical and role health status, and more emergency room visits. Low income and unemployment accounted for most of the differences in non-anxiety-related measures. However, type of clinic still contributed independently to the greater severity of specific measures of panic/anxiety (Panic Disorder Severity Scale and Marks Fear Scale scores), suggesting that the increased stress and limited social resources associated with low-income and disadvantaged status may have more specific effects on anxiety than other aspects of psychopathology.     

Generalized anxiety disorder: prevalence,burden, and cost to society

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a prevalent and disabling disorder characterized by persistent worrying, anxiety symptoms, and tension. It is the most frequent anxiety disorder in primary care, being present in 22% of primary care patients who complain of anxiety problems. The high prevalence rate of GAD in primary care (8%) compared to that reported in the general population (12-month prevalence 1.9-5.1%) suggests that GAD patients are high users of primary care resources. GAD affects women more frequently than men and prevalence rates are high in midlife (prevalence in females over age 35: 10%) and older subjects but relatively low in adolescents. The natural course of GAD can be characterized as chronic with few complete remissions, a waxing and waning course of GAD symptoms, and the occurrence of substantial comorbidity particularly with depression. Patients with GAD demonstrate a considerable degree of impairment and disability, even in its pure form, uncomplicated by depression or other mental disorders. The degree of impairment is similar to that of cases with major depression. GAD comorbid with depression usually reveals considerably higher numbers of disability days in the past month than either condition in its pure form. As a result, GAD is associated with a significant economic burden owing to decreased work productivity and increased use of health care services, particularly primary health care. The appropriate use of psychological treatments and antidepressants may improve both anxiety and depression symptoms and may also play a role in preventing comorbid major depression in GAD thus reducing the burden on both the individual and society.     

Vulnerability to psychosis increases the risk of depression. Results of the RADEP study

We studied prevalence of depressive symptoms in primary care (PrC) and in psychiatric outpatient care (PsC), and how psychotic and manic symptoms are associated with current depressive symptoms. Altogether 563 patients attending PrC and 163 patients attending PsC filled in a questionnaire including the Depression Scale (DEPS), the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) and questions on psychotic symptoms from the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Patients with depressive symptoms (DEPS score > 8) were interviewed by phone using the same checklist 6 months after baseline examination. From the PrC sample, 19.5% and from the PsC sample 73.0% were DEPS positive. In the PrC but not in the PsC sample, patients' background associated strongly with occurrence of depressive symptoms. Both at baseline and at follow-up, depressive symptoms correlated significantly with psychotic and manic symptoms. In multivariate analyses, when the effects of background, health and functioning were taken into account, baseline depressive symptoms associated significantly with lifetime psychotic symptoms. Depressive symptoms at follow-up associated significantly with psychotic symptoms during the follow-up period. In the PrC sample, this association was significant even when the effect of baseline depressive symptoms was controlled. About one-fifth of patients attending primary care and about three-quarters of patients attending psychiatric outpatient patient care suffer from depressive symptoms. Vulnerability to psychosis, indicated by occurrence of psychotic symptoms, increases the risk of and slower recovery from depressive symptoms in the patients attending primary care. Therefore, vulnerability to psychosis should be evaluated when treatment intervention for patients with depressive symptoms is planned.     

Prevalence of psychotic disorder and community level of psychotic symptoms: an urban-rural comparison.

BACKGROUND: Urban and rural populations have different rates of psychotic illness. If psychosis exists as a continuous phenotype in nature, urban-rural population differences in the rate of psychotic disorder should be accompanied by similar differences in the rate of abnormal mental states characterized by psychotic or psychosislike symptoms. METHODS: A random sample of 7076 individuals aged 18 to 64 years were interviewed by trained lay interviewers with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Approximately half of those with evidence of psychosis according to the Composite International Diagnostic Interview were additionally interviewed by clinicians. We investigated associations between a 5-level urbanicity rating and (1) any DSM-III-R diagnosis of psychotic disorder (sample prevalence, 1.5%), (2) any rating of hallucinations and/or delusions (sample prevalence, 4.2%), and (3) any rating of psychotic or psychosislike symptoms (sample prevalence, 17.5%). RESULTS: Level of urbanicity was associated not only with DSM-III-R psychotic disorder (adjusted odds ratio [OR] over 5 levels, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-1.72), but also, independently, with any rating of delusion and/or hallucination (adjusted OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.40; clinician-assessed psychotic symptoms only: OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.03-1.64) and any rating of psychosislike symptom (adjusted OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.13-1.24). Psychotic symptoms were strongly and independently associated with psychotic disorder, regardless of the level of urbanization. CONCLUSIONS: Community level of psychotic and psychosislike symptoms may be inextricably linked to the prevalence of psychotic disorder. The prevalence of abnormal mental states that facilitate development to overt psychotic illness increases progressively with level of urbanization.     

Elevated rates of psychosis among treatment-seeking Hispanic patients with major depression

It is unknown whether rates of psychosis differ among depressed patients of various races and ethnic groups. In the present study, we sought to determine whether Hispanic patients with major depression who present for treatment are more likely to report psychotic symptoms than whites, even after controlling for multiple potential confounding factors. Fifteen hundred patients presenting to the Rhode Island Hospital Department of Psychiatry's outpatient practice underwent standardized diagnostic evaluations. Rates of psychosis were compared among Hispanic patients diagnosed with a current major depressive disorder and a white control group closely matched on several key demographic and clinical variables. Comparison rates of psychosis were also made with other ethnic groups. Rates of psychosis were significantly higher in 22 Hispanic patients diagnosed with depression (27.3%) compared with a closely matched white control group (N = 44; 6.8%; chi = 5.2; df = 1; p = .02). Rates of psychosis were also significantly higher in Hispanics than in Portuguese patients, but not blacks, although the former cohort differed in several key demographic and clinical variables. The study suggests that Hispanic patients with major depression who present for treatment may be more likely than whites to report psychotic symptoms. It remains unclear whether these reports represent true psychosis or culturally influenced idioms of distress.     

Global versus specific symptom attributions: predicting the recognition and treatment of psychological distress in primary care

OBJECTIVE: Researchers have shown that primary care patients utilize global attribution styles to interpret ambiguous physical symptoms, diminishing the ability of practitioners to recognize psychological disorders. The present study examined the extent to which patients' specific beliefs about their presenting symptoms versus their global symptom attribution styles predict physician recognition of psychological distress and mental health treatment recommendations. METHODS: Participants included primary care patients attending a five-physician medical practice. Patients completed surveys regarding their level of psychological distress, symptom attribution style, and perceptions of their presenting problems and medical consultations. Physicians completed brief assessments of each patient encounter. RESULTS: Patient gender, age, severity of psychological distress, and beliefs about their presenting symptoms were reliable predictors of physician recognition and treatment recommendations. Global symptom attribution styles did not relate to these outcomes above and beyond the specific beliefs of patients. CONCLUSION: Patients' specific beliefs about their presenting symptoms play an important role in predicting physician recognition and treatment of psychological distress.     

Psychotic symptoms in combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder

BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is known often to be comorbid with other anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders. Psychotic symptoms have also been noted in PTSD and have been reported to be more common in Hispanic veterans. However, the occurrence of psychotic symptoms, including the degree to which they are accounted for by comorbid disorders, have received limited systematic investigation. Our study objectives were to assess psychotic symptoms according to DSM-III-R criteria in patients with a primary diagnosis of combat-related PTSD and determine the associations of those symptoms with psychiatric comorbidity and ethnicity. METHOD: Fifty-three male combat veterans consecutively admitted to a PTSD rehabilitation unit were assessed for psychotic symptoms and Axis I disorders. Ninety-one percent were Vietnam veterans; 72% were white, 17% were Hispanic, and 11% were black. Associations between psychotic symptoms and comorbid depression, substance use disorders, and minority status were compared by chi-square analyses; associations between psychotic symptoms and both PTSD and dissociative symptom severity were compared by t test analysis. RESULTS: Forty percent of patients reported a psychotic symptom or symptoms in the preceding 6 months. These symptoms featured auditory hallucinations in all but 1 case. The psychotic symptoms typically reflected combat-themes and guilt, were nonbizarre, and were not usually associated with formal thought disorder or flat or inappropriate affect. Psychotic symptoms were significantly associated with current major depression (p < .02), but not with alcohol or drug abuse or with self-rated PTSD and dissociation severity. Psychotic symptoms and current major depression were more common in minority (black and Hispanic) than white veterans (p < .002). CONCLUSION: Psychotic symptoms can be a feature of combat-related PTSD and appear to be associated with major depression. The association with minority status may be a function of comorbidity.     

Immediate Retrospects on the I.P.C.

This study examines the long-term psychiatric consequences, pain interference in daily activities, work loss, and functional impairment associated with 9/11-related loss among low-income, minority primary care patients in New York City. A systematic sample of 929 adult patients completed a survey that included a sociodemographic questionnaire, the PTSD Checklist, the PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 (SF-12).

Approximately one-quarter of the sample reported knowing someone who was killed in the attacks of 9/11, and these patients were sociodemographically similar to the rest of the sample. Compared to patients who had not experienced 9/11-related loss, patients who experienced loss were roughly twice as likely (OR = 1.97, 95%; CI = 1.40, 2.77) to screen positive for at least one mental disorder, including major depressive disorder (MDD; 29.2%), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD; 19.4%), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD; 17.1%). After controlling for pre-9/11 trauma, 9/11-related loss was significantly related to extreme pain interference, work loss, and functional impairment. The results suggest that disaster-related mental health care in this clinical population should emphasize evidence-based treatments for mood and anxiety disorders.