Efficacy of antidepressants in juvenile depression: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The safety of antidepressants in children and adolescents is being questioned and the efficacy of these drugs in juvenile depression remains uncertain. AIMS: To assess antidepressant efficacy in juvenile depression. METHOD: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing responses to antidepressants, overall and by type, v. placebo in young people with depression. RESULTS: Thirty drug-placebo contrasts in RCTs lasting 8 weeks (median) involved 3069 participants (512 person-years) of average age 13.5 years. Meta-analysis yielded a modest pooled drug/placebo response rate ratio (RR=1.22, 95% CI 1.15-1.31), with little separation between antidepressant types. Findings were similar for response rate differences and corresponding number needed to treat (NNT): overall NNT=9; tricyclic antidepressants NNT=14 > serotonin reuptake inhibitors NNT=9 > other antidepressants NNT=8. Numbers needed to treat decreased with increasing age: children (NNT=21) > mixed ages (NNT=10) > adolescents (NNT=8). CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressants of all types showed limited efficacy in juvenile depression, but fluoxetine might be more effective, especially in adolescents. Studies in children and in severely depressed, hospitalised or suicidal juvenile patients are needed, and effective, safe and readily accessible treatments for juvenile depression are urgently required.     

How effective is St John's wort? The evidence revisited

BACKGROUND: St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) has been identified as an effective treatment for depression in controlled studies and subsequent meta-analyses. However, 3 recently published large studies failed to demonstrate robust efficacy. Updated meta-analysis and assessment of publication bias may help determine the true effect of St. John's wort. METHOD: Meta-analysis to reevaluate the effectiveness of St. John's wort as an antidepressant, funnel plot analysis, and meta-regression to assess the impact of publication bias, small-study effects, and variation in trial characteristics were performed. We conducted 2 analyses: a reproduction of a recent meta-analysis including 15 studies (Meta-15) and a meta-analysis extended by the 3 studies published since then (Meta-18). The studies in Meta-15 were identified through MEDLINE and EMBASE searches conducted in June 2000. The search terms used were St. John's wort, hypericum, hypericin, depression, and antidepressant, and no language restrictions were applied. For both meta-analyses, we compared funnel plots, Begg's rank correlation, Egger's regression, trim and fill method, and meta-regression. RESULTS: In both analyses, effect sizes in recent studies were smaller than those reported in earlier studies; the addition of more recent studies into the analyses resulted in reduced effect size. In Meta-15, St. John's wort was significantly more effective than placebo with a risk ratio (RR) of 1.97 (CI = 1.54 to 2.53). In Meta-18, the RR was reduced to 1.73 (CI = 1.40 to 2.14). On funnel plot analysis, the Meta-18 plot proved to be much more skewed than the Meta-15 plot. Meta-regression showed that increase in effect size was associated with smaller sample size only. The impact of baseline severity of depression could not be evaluated as the studies used different versions of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. CONCLUSION: St. John's wort may be less effective in the treatment of depression than previously assumed and may finally be shown to be ineffective if future trials confirm this trend.     

St. John's wort for depression: a meta-analysis of well-defined clinical trials.

Studies concluding that St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) is an effective antidepressant can be challenged due to questionable methodology. We attempt to correct this by a meta-analysis utilizing only well-defined clinical trials. Controlled, double-blind studies using strictly defined depression criteria were analyzed by the rate of change of depression and by the number of "treatment responders." Rates of side effects and dropouts were also analyzed. Hypericum was 1.5 times more likely to result in an antidepressant response than placebo and was equivalent to tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). The meta-analysis also showed that there was a higher dropout rate in the TCA group and that the TCAs were nearly twice as likely to cause side effects, including those more severe than hypericum. Hypericum perforatum was more effective than placebo and similar in effectiveness to low-dose TCAs in the short-term treatment of mild to moderately severe depression. However, design problems in existing studies prevent definitively concluding that St. John's wort is an effective antidepressant.     

Long-term antidepressant treatment in bipolar disorder: meta-analyses of benefits and risks

Objective: Long‐term antidepressant (AD) treatment for depression in bipolar disorder (BPD) patients is highly prevalent, but its benefits and risks remain uncertain, encouraging this meta‐analysis of available research. Method: We reviewed randomized controlled trials for BPD involving ≥6 months of treatment with AD ± mood stabilizer (MS) vs. placebo ± MS, using meta‐analyses to compare reported risks of new depression vs. mania. Results: In seven trials (350 BPD patients) involving 12 contrasts, long‐term treatments that included ADs yielded 27% lower risk of new depression vs. MS‐only or no treatment [pooled relative risk, RR = 0.73; 95% CI 0.55–0.97; number‐needed‐to‐treat (NNT) = 11], but 72% greater risk for new mania [RR = 1.72; 95% CI 1.23–2.41; number‐needed‐to‐harm (NNH) = 7]. Compared with giving an MS‐alone, adding an AD yielded neither major protection from depression (RR = 0.84; 95% CI 0.56–1.27; NNT = 16) nor substantial increase in risk of mania (RR = 1.37; 95% CI 0.81–2.33; NNH = 16). Conclusion: Long‐term adjunctive AD treatment was not superior to MS‐alone in BPD, further encouraging reliance on MSs as the cornerstone of prophylaxis.     

The experimental and clinical pharmacology of St John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum L.).

Hypericum (St John's Wort) is a plant that has been used for centuries as a medicinal herb. Pre-clinical animals studies suggest that hypericum is effective in three major biochemical systems relevant for antidepressant activity, namely the inhibition of the synaptic re-uptake system for serotonin (5-HT), noradrenaline (NA) and dopamine (DA). It is the only antidepressant capable of inhibiting the re-uptake of 5-HT, NA and DA with similar potencies. The potencies for monoamine re-inhibition and chronic changes in receptors are also consistent with changes seen with known antidepressants. Behavioral studies suggest that hypericum is active in pre-clinical animal models of depression with comparable effects to known antidepressants. Supporting the pre-clinical pharmacology and efficacy, many clinical studies have shown that hypericum has superior efficacy compared to placebo and comparable efficacy to standard antidepressants in the treatment of mild-to-moderate depression. The advantage of hypericum over other antidepressants may result from its favorable side-effect profile. Although pre-clinical and short-term clinical studies demonstrate antidepressant activity, the lack of long-term use and efficacy, and the heterogeneity of patients, interventions, extract preparations from previous clinical studies suggests that more careful and controlled studies are needed to determine the long-term efficacy of hypericum in mild-to-moderate depression.     

A systematic review of the treatment of depression with antidepressant drugs in patients who also have a physical illness

To determine whether antidepressants are clinically effective and acceptable for the treatment of depression in people who also have a physical illness. The method used was a systematic review of all randomised controlled trials (found by computer and hand searches) comparing any antidepressant drug with placebo or no treatment, in depressed adults with a specified physical disorder. The main outcome measures are numbers of individuals who recover/improve at the end of the trial and, as a proxy for treatment acceptability, numbers who complete treatment. 18 studies were included, covering 838 patients with a range of physical diseases. 6 studies used SSRIs, 3 atypical antidepressants, and the remainder tricyclics. Patients treated with antidepressants were significantly more likely to improve than those given placebo: about 4 patients would need to be treated with antidepressants to produce one recovery from depression which would not have occurred had they been given placebo (NNT 4.2, 95% CI 3.2-6.4). Most antidepressants (tricyclics and SSRIs together, 15 trials) produced a small but significant increase in dropout (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.14-2.40. NNH 9.8, 95% CI 5.4-42.9). The "atypical" antidepressant mianserin produced significantly less dropout than placebo. Trends towards tricyclics being more effective than SSRIs, but also more likely to produce dropout were noted. The review provides evidence that antidepressants, significantly more frequently than either placebo or no treatment, cause improvement in depression in patients with a wide range of physical diseases.     

St. John's Wort

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to review the current knowledge of the pharmacology, sites of action, and therapeutic effectiveness of St. John's Wort. METHOD: The method used was a review of the available literature, using keywords to search the medline database. Bibliographies of the papers, thus obtained, were searched for further documents not referenced by medline. We reviewed papers from this collection. RESULTS: This review reveals that most of the available data on efficacy and safety of St. John's Wort involve its use in mild to moderate depression. Much, but not all of the prevailing opinion is positive. Nevertheless, the quality of therapeutic trials vary so greatly that definitive conclusions are not possible. Both the source and mode of St. John's Wort's therapeutic effect are unclear. We need further controlled studies of effectiveness, safety, and mode of action. In addition to its use in depression, there are reports suggesting possible therapeutic effects in other conditions such as certain malignancies and infections, but these are far too preliminary to permit any conclusions.     

Hypericum perforatum--a review of clinical studies

St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) has been used as a medicinal herb for over 2000 years. Over the past 2 decades, its application as a plant extract for treating depression has undergone rigorous scientific investigation, and its effectiveness has been shown in studies comparing it with placebo and preference antidepressants. Safety and tolerability studies have revealed that St. John's wort (SJW) preparations have better safety and tolerability profiles than synthetic antidepressants. The indications for St. John's wort preparations comprise patients with mild or moderate depression. Based on the existing literature, limitations to efficacy in more severe cases as well as interactions and contraindications have to be respected.     

Antidepressants versus placebo for the treatment of bulimia nervosa: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to valuate the effectiveness, tolerability and acceptability of various classes of antidepressants compared with placebo in the treatment of bulimia nervosa. METHOD: A meta-analysis including 16 randomised controlled trials and 1300 bulimic patients was performed. Dichotomous outcomes were analysed by calculating relative risks, and continuous outcomes by calculating effect sizes. Methodological quality, heterogeneity in the results and selective publication were assessed. RESULTS: Short-term remission in bulimic symptoms was statistically more likely on antidepressants than placebo (Relative Risk=0.88, 95% CI=0.83-0.94, p<0.0001). Drop-out rates were high but no statistical difference was found between treatment groups (34.6% and 31.4% for drug and placebo; RR=1.03, 95% CI=0.80-1.32, p=0.8). No difference in efficacy could be demonstrated among different classes of antidepressants. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a single antidepressant agent was clinically effective for the treatment of bulimia nervosa when compared with placebo, with an overall greater remission rate and a higher rate of drop-outs. No differential effect regarding efficacy and tolerability among the various classes of antidepressants could be demonstrated.     

St. John's Wort

This article reviews the historical background, active ingredients of St. John's Wort and the major double-blind placebo-controlled studies. Despite the two major failed clinical trials conducted in American Research Centers, most of the data reviewed support that hypericum extracts are more effective than placebo for the treatment of mild to moderate depressive illness. The authors examine the likely reasons for the failed studies and also describe drug interactions and the side effects of St. John's Wort. Those patients who are prescribed St. John's Wort should be closely monitored.     

Effectiveness of mood stabilizers and antipsychotics in the maintenance phase of bipolar disorder: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a leading cause of disability. Systematic reviews of randomized trials for the treatment of the maintenance phase of BD are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of mood stabilizers and antipsychotics in the maintenance treatment of BD. METHODS: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials of licensed medications for the treatment of any phase of BD. We included randomized controlled trials comparing a medication to placebo or another medication. Comprehensive searches of electronic databases were conducted to March 2005. Outcomes investigated were relapse due to mania, depression or any mood episode, and withdrawal due to any reason or due to an adverse event. Data were combined through meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (n = 2,526) met the inclusion criteria. Lithium, lamotrigine, olanzapine and valproate semisodium each demonstrated evidence to support long-term use. Compared with placebo, all medications were more effective at preventing relapse because of any mood episode. Hazard ratios (HR) were 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.53-0.86] for lithium, 0.68 (95% CI = 0.55-0.85) for lamotrigine, and 0.82 (95% CI = 0.57-1.20) for valproate semisodium; for olanzapine, the risk ratio (RR) was 0.58 (95% CI = 0.49-0.69). Lithium and olanzapine significantly reduced manic relapses (HR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.35-0.79 and RR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.24-0.57, respectively). Lamotrigine and valproate semisodium significantly reduced depressive relapses (HR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.46-0.91 and RR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.20-0.82, respectively). Lithium significantly reduced manic relapses compared with lamotrigine (HR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.34-0.92) and olanzapine significantly reduced manic relapses compared with lithium (RR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.12-2.55). Withdrawal due to an adverse event was approximately twice as likely with lithium compared with valproate semisodium (RR = 1.81; 95% CI = 1.08-3.03) and lamotrigine (RR = 2.20; 95% CI = 1.31-3.70). There were few data for carbamazepine or medications given as adjunct therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Mood stabilizers have differing profiles of efficacy and tolerability, suggesting complementary roles in long-term maintenance treatment.     

Predicting stable treatment response in patients with major depression treated with hypericum extract WS 5570/5572

OBJECTIVE: Recent research with several synthetic antidepressants indicates that early improvement during the initial weeks of treatment may be a highly sensitive predictor of therapeutic success in major depression. We investigated whether early improvement is sensitive and specific in predicting sustained response and non-response to antidepressant treatment with Hypericum extract WS(R) 5570/5572 and whether the results reported for synthetic antidepressants apply to these Hypericum extracts as well. METHODS: We analyzed original data of 3 double-blind, randomized trials including a total of 594 adult out-patients suffering from major depression according to DSM-IV criteria, who received well-characterized Hypericum extract preparations WS(R) 5570, WS(R) 5572, WS(R) 5573 or placebo for 6 weeks. The main outcome measure was the prediction of a sustained > or = 50 % decrease of the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) total score versus baseline ('sustained response') by the presence of > or =20 % HAM-D total score improvement after 1 and 2 weeks of treatment ('early improvement'). RESULTS: For Hypericum extract, early improvement had a sensitivity of 87 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 82-93 %) and a specificity of 54 % (95 % CI, 45-62 %) at day 14, and a sensitivity of 43 % (95 % CI, 35-51 %) and a specificity of 86 % (95 % CI, 80-92 %) at day 7 for predicting sustained response. After 2 weeks of treatment, 78 % (95 % CI, 69-87 %) of the patients who failed to improve did not show sustained response later during treatment. CONCLUSION: A substantial fraction of the patients treated with Hypericum extracts WS(R) 5570/5572 showed a meaningful reduction of depressive symptoms during the first two weeks of treatment (early improvement), which was found to be a sensitive predictor of sustained response. The results determined for the herbal extracts were comparable to those for effective synthetic antidepressants investigated previously.     

The effectiveness of St. John's Wort in major depressive disorder: a naturalistic phase 2 follow-up in which nonresponders were provided alternate medication

BACKGROUND: A continuation study of an extract of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) for depression was performed in follow-up to an acute study that found no significant difference between St. John's wort extract and placebo. METHOD: Seventeen subjects with DSM-IV-defined major depressive disorder who responded to St. John's wort extract in the acute-phase study (phase 1) were continued on double-blind treatment with the same preparation for 24 weeks. Ninety-five subjects who did not respond to either St. John's wort or placebo were treated with an antidepressant for 24 weeks. RESULTS: During antidepressant treatment, mean scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression for phase 1 nonresponders decreased significantly (p <.0001), with no significant difference between St. John's wort nonresponders and placebo nonresponders. Of the 17 subjects continued on treatment with St. John's wort extract, 5 (29.4%) relapsed. CONCLUSIONS: The subjects who did not respond to St. John's wort extract or placebo in phase 1 were, by and large, not resistant to antidepressant treatment. This suggests that the lack of efficacy found by Shelton et al. in the acute-phase study was unlikely to be the result of a high proportion of treatment-resistant subjects.     

Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for treatment of depression in Alzheimer's disease: a metaanalysis.

OBJECTIVE: Depression in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) is common (15% to 63%) and is associated with significant morbidity and increased mortality. Our objective was to quantitatively summarize the data on the efficacy and safety of antidepressant treatment for depression complicating AD. METHOD: We performed a metaanalysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants with a database search of the English literature (up to 2006) and a manual search of references in the retrieved articles. We extracted the proportion of subjects who responded and remitted, experienced adverse events (AEs), discontinued treatment due to AEs, or discontinued treatment for any reason. Cognition scores were also extracted. RESULTS: We included 5 studies, which involved 82 subjects treated with antidepressants and 83 subjects who received placebo treatment. Antidepressants were superior to placebo for both treatment response (odds ratio [OR] 2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 5.16) and remission of depression (OR 2.75; 95% CI, 1.13 to 6.65). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for change in cognition (weighted mean difference -0.71, 95% CI, -3.20 to 1.79), overall dropouts (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.66) or dropout due to AEs (OR 1.41; 95% CI 0.36 to 5.54). The numbers needed to treat for one additional AD patient to respond to antidepressant treatment were 5 (95% CI, 3 to 59) and 5 (95% CI, 2 to 24) for remission of depression. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant treatment for depression in AD is efficacious, with rates of discontinuation that are comparable to placebo. Nonetheless, clinicians must be vigilant regarding the potential side effects of antidepressants in this population.     

S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAMe) as antidepressant: meta-analysis of clinical studies

Introduction - S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAMe) is a naturally-occurring substance which is a major source of methyl groups in the brain. Material and methods - We conducted a meta-analysis of the studies on SAMe to assess the efficacy of this compound in the treatment of depression compared with placebo and standard tricyclic antidepressants. Results - Our meta-analysis showed a greater response rate with SAMe when compared with placebo, with a global effect size ranging from 17% to 38% depending on the definition of response, and an antidepressant effect comparable with that of standard tricyclic antidepressants. Conclusion - The efficacy of SAMein treating depressive syndromes and disorders is superior with that of placebo and comparable to that of standard tricyclic antidepressants. Since SAMe is a naturally occurring compound with relatively few side-effects, it is a potentially important treatment for depression.     

Hypericum perforatum extract in treatment of mild to moderate depression. Clinical and pharmacological aspects

For many years, hypericum extracts have been used in the treatment of depressive disorders. The therapeutical use of these extracts has been predominantly justified for a long time by the clinical evidence of efficacy and only partly by results of scientific studies. The aim of the present investigation is to perform a meta-analysis of the placebo- and verum-controlled studies carried out till now, to examine the relevance of hyperforin and hypericin for the clinical efficacy of St. John's Wort, to discuss biochemical and pharmacoendocrinological studies investigating the mechanism of action, and to describe side effects and interactions of hypericum extracts. In particular during recent years, methodologically quite sophisticated studies have been performed. The comprehensive evaluation of all studies available suggests a significant superiority of hypericum extracts over placebo, despite the negative results of two recently published American trials, and a therapeutic efficacy comparable to that of synthetic antidepressants in mildly to moderately depressed patients. Furthermore, it has been suggested in preclinical and clinical studies that the content of hyperforin but not of hypericin decisively contributes to the antidepressant efficacy of hypericum extracts. Hyperforin has been demonstrated in biochemical investigations--like synthetic antidepressants--to inhibit the reuptake of the neurotransmitters norepinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine. Hypericum extracts can be regarded as well tolerated, and they extend the variety of pharmacotherapeutical options in the treatment of depression, especially in outpatients. However, interactions in combination treatments are possible by interference with the cytochrom P450 system, thereby changing plasma levels of other medications.     

Mania associated with St. John's wort.

BACKGROUND: St. John's wort, the popular herbal remedy touted as an antidepressant, is generally thought to be benign, with few reported side effects. Given its possible efficacy as an antidepressant, evaluation of its propensity to cause affective switching should be evaluated. METHODS: This report presents two cases of mania temporally associated with the use of St. John's wort (hypericum). RESULTS: As with other antidepressant agents, St. John's wort may precipitate hypomania, mania, or an increased cycling of mood states, particularly in patients with occult bipolar disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Because the majority of people who take this popular over-the-counter preparation do so without formal psychiatric evaluations, risk of hypericum-induced mania may be significant. Physicians should screen patients for a history of hypomania or mania before recommending use of St. John's wort for depression.     

Combination of antidepressants and psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa: a systematic review

This review assessed the effect of a combination of antidepressants plus psychological approaches compared to each single treatment for bulimia nervosa. METHOD: Trials were included in two meta-analyses: single antidepressants versus combination and single psychological approaches versus combination. Methodological quality and homogeneity of results were assessed. Dichotomous outcomes were analysed by calculating relative risks (RR). RESULT: Five trials were included in meta-analysis 1 and 7 in meta-analysis 2. Remission rates were 42% for combination versus 23% for antidepressants (RR = 1.38; 95% CI=0.98-1.93; P=0.06) and 36% for psychological approaches compared to 49% for combination (RR= 1.21; P=0.03). Drop-out rates were 16% for psychological approaches and 30% for combination (RR =0.57; 95% CI = 0.38-0.088; P=0.11). CONCLUSION: Efficacy of combined treatments was superior to single approaches. When antidepressants were combined to treatment, acceptability of psychological approaches was significantly reduced.     

Extended-release epidural morphine (DepoDur): review and safety analysis

Extended-release epidural morphine (EREM) provides effective postoperative analgesia for 48 h following injection. It is administered as a single bolus into the lumbar epidural space, and is indicated for lower abdominal and lower extremity surgery associated with moderate-to-severe pain. While its efficacy has been well documented in randomized controlled trials, the safety and clinically appropriate dosing are less well defined. A meta-analysis approach was used to assess the adverse effects of EREM (n = 801) in comparison with intravenous opioids and standard epidural morphine. EREM 15 mg or greater was associated with a trend towards a higher incidence of hypoventilation (odds ratio: 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-1.09; p = 0.081; number-needed-to-treat [NNT] = 14) compared with placebo. The incidence of pruritus was significantly higher for all EREM doses compared with both placebo (p = 0.004) and standard epidural morphine (p = 0.03). Vomiting was also increased with EREM 15 mg or greater compared with placebo (odds ratio: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.18-0.89; p = 0.02; NNT = 5). A multimodal analgesic regime is recommended to permit the use of lower EREM doses, thus reducing the risk for adverse effects including respiratory depression. Prophylactic time-contingent antiemetics are also recommended when EREM is used.