肩袖损伤的MRI诊断比较研究

目的:比较常规MRI和MRI间接关节造影检查对肩袖撕裂伤的诊断价值.方法:搜集2002年11月～2006年8月共40例肩袖损伤病例,20例行常规MRI检查,20例行MRI间接关节造影检查.以肩关节镜作为诊断标准,比较两种影像学方法诊断肩袖损伤的敏感性和特异性.结果:肩袖完全撕裂中,常规MRI检查的敏感度为45.5%,特异度为66.7%,准确度为55%;MRI间接关节造影的敏感度为92.3%,特异度为85.7%,准确度为90%.肩袖不全撕裂中,常规MRI检查敏感度为57.1%,特异度为53.8%,准确度为55%;而间接关节造影敏感度为83.3%,特异度为92.8%,准确度则为90%.经Fisher确切概率统计法统计,MRI间接关节造影诊断肩袖全层撕裂敏感性及准确性明显高于常规MRI(P＜0.05),在诊断肩袖部分撕裂时,MRI间接关节造影的特异性及准确性明显高于MRI(P＜0.05).结论:MRI间接关节造影较常规MRI诊断肩袖撕裂准确性较高.同时对盂唇等其它病变诊断有帮助.     

肩关节损伤的MR影像诊断

目的 探讨常规MRI和MR间接关节造影对肩关节损伤的诊断价值.方法 回顾分析经关节镜证实的90例肩关节损伤患者肩关节常规MRI和MR问接关节造影表现,其中肩袖病变组57例、盂肱关节不稳组33例.对常规MRI和MR间接关节造影诊断结果进行Fisher确切概率法比较.结果 (1)肩袖病变组中MR间接关节造影37例,显示部分撕裂10例,1例漏诊;显示完全撕裂17例,2例误诊,7例肩袖无撕裂.MR间接关节造影显示部分撕裂的敏感度、特异度、准确度分别为90.9%(10/11)、92.3%(24/26)、91.9%(34/37);显示完全撕裂的敏感度、特异度、准确度分别为89.5%(17/19)、94.4%(17/18)、91.9%(34/37).MR间接关节造影诊断肩袖部分及完全撕裂的敏感度及准确度均高于常规MRI(P<0.05).(2)盂肱关节不稳组中,盂唇损伤26例,Hill-sachs病变27例、反Hill-sachs病变2例、骨陛Bankart损伤7例、关节囊损伤18例.间接关节造影20例,显示盂唇损伤14例,1例漏诊,5例正常.MR间接关节造影显示盂唇损伤的敏感度、特异度、准确度分别为93.3%(14/15)、100.0%(5/5)、95.0%(19/20).前者诊断盂唇损伤的敏感度及准确度明显高于常规MRI(P<0.05).结论 MR检查特别是MR间接关节造影能够准确显示肩关节常见病变及相关组织的病理发展过程,为临床诊断及治疗提供影像学依据.     

磁共振肩关节造影在肩袖完全撕裂诊断的临床应用

目的:探讨磁共振肩关节造影检查对肩袖完全撕裂的诊断价值.方法:回顾性分析54例肩袖完全撕裂MR关节造影及MRI表现,与肩关节镜手术结果对照.结果:54例肩袖完全撕裂病例,MRI诊断的敏感度、特异度及准确度分别是87.03％、50.00％和79.41％;MR关节造影诊断Ⅰ型9例、Ⅱ型21例,其敏感度分别为88.89％、95.24％;特异度分别为97.87％、97.14％;准确度分别为96.43％、96.43％;明显高于常规MRI诊断,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05);与关节镜结果对比,其一致性极佳(Kappa=0.841);而对于Ⅲ型肩袖完全撕裂,MR关节造影均不能显示.结论:MR关节造影能较准确判断Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型肩袖完全撕裂范围及程度,是MRI诊断肩袖损伤的有效补充,为临床诊断和治疗能提供更准确的依据,而对于Ⅲ型肩袖完全撕裂,MR关节造影不能显示其损伤部位及程度,无法对其进行诊断.     

常规MRI及MRI肩关节造影在肩袖撕裂中的应用

目的:探讨常规MRI及MRI肩关节造影在肩袖撕裂诊断中的价值。方法:226例肩关节损伤的患者,分别行常规MRI及MRI肩关节造影检查,以近期肩关节镜检查为金标准,对比2种检查方法的敏感性及特异性。结果:常规MRI对肩袖撕裂诊断的敏感性为70.8%(17/24),特异性100%(2/2),准确性65.4%(17/26);MRI肩关节造影对肩袖撕裂的敏感性为95.8%(23/24),特异性100%(2/2),准确性88.5%(23/26)。两者的诊断敏感性差异有统计学意义(P=0.016)。结论:MRI肩关节造影可以显著提高肩袖撕裂诊断的敏感性。     

3.0T MR肩关节造影对肩袖损伤的诊断价值分析

目的探讨3. 0T MR肩关节造影在肩袖损伤诊断中的价值。方法回顾性分析2014年3月～2017年3月期间,经关节镜检查证实的111例肩袖损伤的肩关节术前常规MRI和MR关节造影资料。结果 111例肩关节中,肩袖完全撕裂15例,常规MRI和MR关节造影正确诊断率均为100%;肩袖部分撕裂96例,其中滑囊面型27例、肌腱内型26例、关节面型43例,常规MRI对以上三种类型的肩袖部分撕裂正确诊断率分别为85. 2%、88. 5%和76. 7%,MR关节造影对其正确诊断率分别为85. 2%、80. 8%和93. 0%;两种检查方法对滑囊面型和肌腱内型肩袖部分撕裂的诊断无明显差异,而对关节面型肩袖部分撕裂的诊断,MR关节造影优于常规MRI,差异有统计学意义(P 0. 05)。结论 MR关节造影对肩袖损伤的诊断具有较高的价值,但在关节滑囊型和肌腱内型两种类型的肩袖部分撕裂的诊断中仍存在一定的局限性。     

肩袖损伤的影像学及关节镜诊疗价值

目的探讨肩袖损伤的影像学改变及关节镜检查在诊疗中的价值。方法18例肩袖损伤术前行造影和磁共振成像(MRI)。关节镜手术18例，其中关节镜下肩峰成形减压术16例，小切口肩峰成形2例。全层肩袖损伤10例行小切口肩袖缝合，肩袖部分磨损8例行关节镜下刨削清理术。结果肩关节造影13例，其中9例显示肩关节腔与肩峰下滑囊和三角肌下滑囊沟通，4例未见异常。MRI检查18例，其中10例显示肩袖全层损伤，8例冈上肌腱信号异常为部分损伤。根据关节镜检查结果判断其诊断准确率，MRI为100％，肩关节造影69％。术后随访时间3～22个月，平均7个月。根据美国加州洛杉矶大学(UCLA)肩关节评分标准，优9例，良6例，可3例，优良率达83％。结论肩关节造影有助于全层肩袖损伤的诊断；MRI对肩袖部分和全层损伤正确诊断率和敏感性最高；关节镜治疗肩袖损伤具有微创，有利于功能恢复。     

肩袖全层撕裂:肩关节MRI评价

目的 评价肩关节MRI对肩袖全层撕裂的诊断价值,并对比分析肩关节MRI造影和常规肩关节MRI的诊断性能.资料与方法 由两名影像诊断医师独立回顾分析264例肩关节MRI图像,包括127例常规肩关节MRI检查和137例肩关节MRI造影,分析结果与肩关节镜手术相比较.计算肩关节MRI评价肩袖全层撕裂的敏感性和特异性.采用Kappa统计计算两名影像诊断医师评价的一致性.结果 264例患者中,肩袖全层撕裂60例(冈上肌腱全层撕裂60例,冈下肌腱全层撕裂5例,肩胛下肌腱全层撕裂5例,小圆肌腱全层撕裂4例).肩关节MRI评估肩袖全层撕裂的敏感性和特异性两名医师分别为88.33%(53/60)和97.55%(199/204),95.00%(57/60)和95.10%(194/204),K=0.906.肩关节MRI与肩关节MRI造影对于肩袖全层撕裂的敏感性和特异性差异无统计学意义.结论 肩关节MRI是评价肩袖全层撕裂可靠的方法.对于冈上肌腱全层撕裂,肩关节MRI造影和常规肩关节MRI的诊断价值相似.     

MRI和MR关节造影在肩部损伤中的诊断价值

目的 :探讨MRI(核磁共振成像 )和MR关节造影在肩部损伤中的诊断价值。方法 :自 1999年 3月至 1999年11月 ,共有 73个患者 75例肩关节接受了肩部MRI检查 ,其中 16例经关节镜或手术证实。对手术中所见与核磁共振表现进行比较。结果 :对肩袖完全撕裂 ,MRI和MR关节造影对全层撕裂诊断阳性率分别为 90 .6 %和 10 0 % ,特异性分别为 96 %和 97.6 %。MRI对肩袖部分撕裂诊断正确率低 ,可靠性差 ;MR关节造影诊断正确率达 80 % ,是肩袖部分撕裂诊断的可靠方法。MRI对急性Bankart损伤诊断阳性率 10 0 % ,对慢性或陈旧损伤 ,阳性率低 ,只有 33.3% ;而MR关节造影对慢性或陈旧损伤诊断阳性率达 10 0 %。对SLAP损伤 ,MR关节造影较MRI诊断阳性率高 ,但目前关节镜仍是SLAP损伤更可靠的定性诊断手段。     

常规MRI与MR关节造影诊断肩袖撕裂的初步对比研究

目的 比较3.0T常规MRI和MR关节造影检查对肩袖撕裂的诊断价值.方法 分析48例肩关节病变患者的常规MRI和MR关节造影检查资料,确定肩袖有无撕裂并进行分型.其中4例行肩关节镜检查.采用配对x2检验比较两种检查方法诊断肩袖撕裂的差异性.结果 常规MRI显示冈上肌腱全层撕裂6例,冈上肌腱部分撕裂9例;MR关节造影显示冈上肌腱全层撕裂7例,冈上肌腱部分撕裂8例.常规MRI和MR关节造影检查方法对肩袖全层撕裂诊断有6例相同,1例常规MRI诊断无撕裂MR关节造影诊断为撕裂;对肩袖部分撕裂的诊断有7例相同,3例不同,其中2例常规MRI诊断为撕裂而MR关节造影诊断为无撕裂,1例常规MRI诊断为无撕裂而MR关节造影诊断为撕裂;两种检查方法对肩袖全层撕裂(x2=0.000,P＞0.05)及部分撕裂(x2=o.000,P＞0.05)的诊断差异无统计学意义.结论 初步显示3.0T常规MRI对肩袖全层撕裂和肩袖部分撕裂的诊断能达到MR关节造影的诊断效果,同时可以显示肩袖撕裂伴发的各种异常.     

肩关节MR造影三维VIBE序列对肩袖撕裂的评价

目的 对比评价肩关节MR造影三维 VIBE和常规二维TSE T1W序列对肩袖撕裂的诊断价值.方法 由2名影像诊断医师独立回顾对比分析99例肩关节造影三维 VIBE重建图像和常规二维TSE T1W序列图像,判定有无肩袖撕裂,分别计算其敏感性和特异性.采用McNemar检验评价2种方法诊断价值是否存在统计学差异.结果 99例患者中,肩关节镜证实肩袖撕裂为35例,其中全层撕裂为13例,部分撕裂为22例(关节侧撕裂8例,滑囊侧撕裂9例,腱内撕裂5例).三维 VIBE与常规二维TSE T1W序列对肩袖全层撕裂和关节侧撕裂均准确诊断.三维 VIBE对肩袖撕裂的敏感性和特异性分别为62.86%和96.88%(医师甲),60.00%和98.44%(医师乙);常规二维TSE T1W序列对肩袖撕裂的敏感性和特异性分别为60.00%和96.88%(医师甲),65.71%和96.88%(医师乙).三维 VIBE与常规二维TSE T1W序列的诊断性能无统计学差异.结论 肩关节MR造影三维 VIBE序列可以替代常规二维TSE T1W序列评价肩袖撕裂.     

肩关节损伤MRI与关节镜的对比分析

目的探讨常规MRI对肩关节损伤的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析因肩关节损伤行常规MRI和关节镜检查的55例病人资料,MRI观察指标包括肩袖、盂唇形态及信号,有否肩峰下撞击及骨性损伤。以肩关节镜为诊断金标准,统计MRI对不同类型肩关节损伤的诊断结果,并分别计算MRI的诊断敏感度、特异度和准确度。采用Kappa检验分析MRI与肩关节镜诊断结果的一致性。结果肩关节损伤的MRI征象中分别有25%部分肩袖撕裂、13.3%Bankart’s损伤、20%盂唇上部前后方向(SLAP)损伤和11.6%肩峰下撞击漏诊。MRI诊断损伤性病变的特异度及肩袖全层撕裂(100%)、骨性损伤(100%)、肩峰下撞击(88%)和Bankart’s损伤(87%)的敏感度较高,诊断SLAP损伤(75%)和肩袖部分撕裂(75%)的敏感度较低;诊断肩袖全层撕裂(100%)和骨性损伤(100%)的准确度最高,其次是Bankart’s损伤(96%),诊断SLAP损伤(89%)的准确度较低。MRI和关节镜诊断肩袖全层撕裂、骨性损伤的κ值为1,结果完全一致,诊断Bankart’s损伤的κ值为0.904,一致性较好,诊断肩袖部分撕裂、SLAP损伤和肩峰下撞击的κ值虽稍低,但均0.75,一致性也较好,P均0.05。结论 MRI是有效诊断肩关节损伤的影像方法,但对SLAP损伤和肩袖部分撕裂的诊断准确度有待提高。     

肩袖撕裂的肩关节MR造影评价

目的 评价肩关节MR造影对肩袖撕裂的诊断价值。方法 分析32例病人的肩关节MR造影图像,评价内容包括肩袖肌腱、盂唇、肱二头肌长头腱,结果与肩关节镜及肩部开放手术比较。结果 以肩关节镜和手术结果为标准,32例病人包括14例全层撕裂,6例下表面部分撕裂,12例无撕裂。肩关节MR造影判定有无肩袖撕裂的敏感性、特异性和准确性都为100％;诊断全层撕裂的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为100％、94％和97％。同时,肩关节MR造影还正确诊断了所有的多肌腱撕裂、合并的盂唇异常及肱二头肌长头腱异常。结论 肩关节MR造影可以准确、全面地评价肩袖撕裂。     

MR imaging diagnosis of rotator cuff tears

Thirty-one symptomatic patients were studied with MR imaging to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of shoulder MR in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. Correlative studies included arthroscopy in 19 patients and arthrography in 12 patients. Images were obtained on either a 0.5- or 1.5-T Philips superconducting magnet using spin-echo pulse sequences (650-850/30 [TR, TE], 2000/30, 100) with 5-mm slices oriented in an oblique coronal plane perpendicular to the glenohumeral joint. The MR studies were initially interpreted without knowledge of the results of other diagnostic procedures. The MR diagnosis of cuff tear was made when irregularity, discontinuity, and increased signal were identified in the rotator cuff. MR images showed tears in 10 patients (32%) and were negative for tear in 21 patients (68%). MR correlated with arthroscopy and arthrography in 17 of 18 normal patients, in eight of 10 patients with complete tears, and in one of three patients with partial tears. For complete rotator cuff tears, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 80%, 94%, and 89%, respectively. For all tears (partial and complete), the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 69%, 94%, and 84%, respectively. These data suggest that MR imaging is an accurate procedure for the diagnosis of complete rotator cuff tears. The number of partial tears (three) in this series is too small to evaluate the value of MR imaging in the diagnosis of partial tears.     

Rotator cuff tears: prospective comparison of MR imaging with arthrography, sonography, and surgery

Thirty-eight patients with suspected rotator cuff tears were examined at 1.5 T by using a loop-gap resonator surface coil. The MR findings were compared prospectively in a blinded fashion with the results from double-contrast arthrography in all 38 patients, high-resolution sonography in 23 patients, and surgery in 16 patients. In the total group of 38 patients, MR imaging detected 22 of 22 tears and 14 of 16 intact cuffs as determined by arthrography. In the 16 surgically proved cases, MR and arthrography showed identical results, with 92% sensitivity in the diagnosis of 12 tears and 100% specificity in the diagnosis of four intact cuffs. In a subgroup of 23 patients, sonography detected nine of 15 tears and seven of eight intact cuffs as determined by comparison with arthrography. In 10 surgically proved cases, sonography was 63% sensitive in the diagnosis of eight rotator cuff tears and 50% specific in the diagnosis of two intact cuffs. For the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears, MR imaging is comparable to arthrography in both sensitivity and specificity. In this study, sonography was not as accurate in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears as were the other two techniques. These results suggest that MR imaging should be considered the noninvasive test of choice for patients with suspected rotator cuff disease.     

Shoulder instability: accuracy of MR imaging performed after surgery in depicting recurrent injury--initial findings.

PURPOSE: To analyze a series of postoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained in patients with recurrent signs or symptoms of instability in whom subsequent surgical correlation was performed to determine the accuracy in diagnosing recurrent injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors identified 24 patients who underwent MR imaging after shoulder instability surgery and had recurrent instability requiring repeat surgery. Twelve nonenhanced MR images and six indirect and six direct MR arthrograms were retrospectively reviewed with consensus to determine the presence or absence of recurrent labral or rotator cuff tear. Operative reports were reviewed to confirm the presence or absence of labral or rotator cuff tear. The mean interval between initial surgery and MR imaging was 10 months. The mean interval until repeat surgery was 2 months. RESULTS: Overall, the accuracy of postoperative MR imaging was 79% in depicting recurrent labral tear and 88% in depicting recurrent rotator cuff tear. Indirect MR arthrography had 100% accuracy for recurrent labral tear detection, whereas direct MR arthrography and nonenhanced MR imaging had accuracies of 67% and 75%, respectively. Direct MR arthrography was more sensitive, 100% versus 71%, but less specific, 60% versus 80%, than nonenhanced MR imaging in depicting recurrent labral tears. Direct MR arthrography had 100% accuracy in depicting rotator cuff tear, whereas both indirect MR arthrography and nonenhanced MR imaging had 83% accuracy. CONCLUSION: MR imaging, indirect MR arthrography in particular, appears to be an accurate means of evaluating the shoulder following instability surgery.     

超声诊断肩袖撕裂的临床指导价值研究

目的：探讨肩袖撕裂的超声特征,评价超声检查肩袖撕裂的应用价值及对临床治疗的指导意义。方法：对临床怀疑有肩袖损伤的66例患者（70个肩关节）进行超声检查,并与手术、肩关节造影或磁共振结果进行比较。结果：肩袖撕裂的主要超声表现为：肩袖内局灶性异常回声,肩袖部分缺失,肩袖不显示。超声诊断的敏感性为98%（54/55）,特异性为81%（17/21）,准确性为93%（65/70）。结论：超声诊断肩袖撕裂有很高的应用价值,对临床治疗有很好的指导意义。