Long Disease Duration Interferes With Therapeutic Effect of Globus Pallidus Internus Pallidal Stimulation in Primary Cervical Dystonia

Objectives: We retrospectively investigated the correlation between disease duration and the therapeutic effect of globus pallidus internus (GPi) stimulation in patients with primary cervical dystonia (CD). Materials and Methods: Eight patients with CD unresponsive to medical treatments underwent bilateral GPi deep brain stimulation (DBS). They were followed for 63.5 ± 38.2 months (mean ± standard deviation) and were assessed before and at 1, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery and at their final visit to our outpatient clinic using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS). Univariate analysis was performed to identify factors that affected their postoperative TWSTRS score. Results: At last follow‐up, disease severity and the degree of disability and pain on the TWSTRS were significantly improved by 70.2%, 76.1%, and 87.1%, respectively (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon signed‐rank test). Neither age nor preoperative CD severity was predictive of postoperative improvement; however, the disease duration affected their reduction rate of TWSTRS severity score at each time point investigated (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Bilateral GPi‐DBS is an effective long‐term therapy in patients with CD. The delivery of GPi stimulation in the earlier course of CD may yield greater postoperative improvement.     

Good long-term efficacy of pallidal stimulation in cervical dystonia: a prospective, observer-blinded study

Background and purpose: Deep brain stimulation of the internal globus pallidus (GPi‐DBS) is established as an effective treatment of primary generalised dystonia in controlled studies. In cervical dystonia (CD), only one previous study has reported observer‐blinded outcome assessment of long‐term GPi‐DBS, with 1‐year follow‐up. Methods: In this prospective, single‐centre study, eight patients with CD (7 women:1 man, 4 focal:4 segmental) treated with bilateral GPi‐DBS for median (range) 30 (12–48) months, were evaluated by the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS; Severity, Disability and Pain scores), the Short‐Form Health Survey‐36 (SF‐36), and the Becks Depression Index in an open design. In addition, a blinded rater assessed the TWSTRS Severity score from videos obtained preoperatively and at the last follow‐up. Results: In the blinded evaluation, median (range) TWSTRS Severity score improved from 25 (19–30) to 8 (4–23) (P = 0.028), thus a 70% (23–82) score reduction. In the open evaluation, median Severity score improvement at the last follow‐up was 73%, representing a significant further improvement from 50% at 6 months. The Disability and Pain scores improved by median 91% and 92%, respectively, and the SF‐36 subdomain scores improved significantly. A reversible right hemiparesis and aphasia occured in one patient 4 days postoperatively, because of reversible oedema around the left electrode. No other serious adverse effects and no permanent morbidity were observed. Conclusions: This single‐blinded study shows good long‐term efficacy of GPi‐DBS in CD patients and supports using this treatment in those who have insufficient response to medical treatment.     

Pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with cranial-cervical dystonia (Meige syndrome).

Idiopathic cranial-cervical dystonia (ICCD) is an adult-onset dystonia syndrome affecting orbicularis oculi, facial, oromandibular, and cervical musculature. ICCD is frequently difficult to treat medically. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is a highly effective treatment for idiopathic generalized dystonia, however less is known about the effect of GPi DBS on ICCD. In this article, we present the results from a pilot study assessing the effect of GPi DBS in a series of patients with ICCD. Six patients underwent bilateral stereotactic implantation of DBS leads into the sensorimotor GPi. Patients were evaluated with the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS) and Toronto western spamodic torticollis rating scale (TWSTRS) before surgery and 6 months postoperatively. At 6 months, patients showed a 72% mean improvement in the BFMDRS total movement score (P < 0.028, Wilcoxin signed rank test). The mean BFMDRS disability score showed a trend toward improvement (P < 0.06). The total TWSTRS score improved 54% (P < 0.043). Despite improvement in dystonia, mild worsening of motor function was reported in previously nondystonic body regions with stimulation in 4 patients. Although GPi DBS was effective in these patients, the influence of GPi DBS on nondystonic body regions deserves further investigation.     

Globus pallidus deep brain stimulation for adult-onset axial dystonia

IntroductionGeneralized dystonia, both primary and secondary forms, and axial dystonias such as tardive dystonia, and idiopathic cervical dystonia are responsive to globus pallidus interna (GPi) DBS. There is a paucity of investigations probing the impact of DBS on adult-onset axial dystonia. We assessed the efficacy of GPi DBS in four patients with rare adult-onset axial dystonia.MethodsPrimary outcome measure was improvement in the motor component of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden (BFM) rating scale. Secondary outcome measures were quality of life as determined by the SF-36 questionnaire, time to achieve best possible benefit and DBS parameters that accounted for the best response. In patients with prominent concomitant cervical dystonia we also used the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS).ResultsGPi DBS improved BFM scores by 87.63 ± 11.46%. Improvement in total severity scale of TWSTRS was 71.5 ± 12.7%. Quality of life also remarkably improved as evidenced by 109.38 ± 82.97 and 7.05 ± 21.48% percent change in psychometrically-based physical component summary (PCS), and a mental component summary (MCS) score respectively.ConclusionsGPi DBS is a very effective treatment for adult-onset axial dystonia. Considering its refractoriness to medical therapy and significant impact on quality of life DBS should be considered for this disorder.     

Pallidal stimulation in cervical dystonia: clinical implications of acute changes in stimulation parameters

Background and purpose:  Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is successful in dystonia, but the role of each electrical parameters of stimulation is unclear. We studied the clinical effects of acute changes of different parameters of GPi–DBS in cervical dystonia (CD).
Methods:  Eight CD patients with bilateral GPi–DBS at 28.6 ± 19.2 (mean ± SD) months after surgery were recruited. Mean improvement in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity score was 54.5% compared to before surgery. Ten settings, including a combination of a wide range of pulse widths (PWs), low and high frequencies and voltage, were administered in a randomized double blinded fashion. Clinical benefit was assessed by two raters using the TWSTRS and by the patients using an analogue rating scale.
Results:  The TWSTRS severity scores were reduced by 56.7% with stimulation at the best settings. Improvement was significantly associated with high frequency (≥60 Hz) and high voltage. Stimulation at 130 Hz showed the best clinical improvement. Increasing PWs (from 60 to 450 μs) did not result in a significant improvement.
Conclusion:  Frequency and amplitude appear to be the most important factors in the acute anti-dystonic effects in GPi–DBS patients with CD.     

Bilateral pallidal stimulation improves cervical dystonia for more than a decade

IntroductionDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment in medically resistant cervical dystonia (CD) with a documented therapeutic effect. Long term outcome beyond a decade, however, has not been studied systematically.MethodsTo investigate the impact of pallidal DBS beyond 10 years in CD we followed a series of five consecutive patients with severe medication-resistant CD. Severity of head and neck deviation, disability, and pain related to dystonia were assessed by the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) in the frame of a prospective study. The primary endpoint of this study was a change in the TWSTRS total score. Secondary endpoints were changes in the subscores of the TWSTRS.ResultsThe mean follow-up time was 11.5 years (range 10–12.8). Comparing baseline and the last follow-up, CD improved by 53% on the total TWSTRS score, by 54.1% on the severity score, and by 70.1% on the disability score, while pain did not improve significantly. Improvement was stable over time. Patients with a tonic pattern of CD responded less to DBS than patients with a phasic pattern. DBS had no significant effect on mood and cognition. Two patients underwent electrode revisions. One patient had an infection of the proximal cable two years after surgery.ConclusionsChronic bilateral pallidal stimulation improves severity of dystonia and disability over more than a decade in treatment resistant CD. Results may vary among individual patients.     

Evaluation of the efficacy of deep brain stimulation in the surgical treatment of cervical dystonia

ObjectiveDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is a promising therapeutic option for patients with medically refractory dystonia. We present the results after 1 year of DBS of the GPi in 4 patients with cervical dystonia.Materials and methodsFour patients with medically refractory cervical dystonia who underwent stereotactic pallidal DBS surgery between June 2010 and November 2011 were included in this retrospective study. Preoperative and postoperative evaluations at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery were performed using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS).ResultsThe 4 patients experienced a sustained improvement, with a mean TWSTRS reduction of 74.25%, at 12 months follow-up. Disability improved by 80.5% (mean) at 1 year follow-up. No stimulation-related side effects were reported.ConclusionPallidal DBS is a valid and effective second-line treatment for patients with cervical focal dystonia. Our results support its use in patients with an insufficient response to medical treatment.     

Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus in tardive dystonia

Tardive dystonia is a disabling movement disorder as a consequence of exposure to neuroleptic drugs. We followed 6 patients with medically refractory tardive dystonia treated by bilateral globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for 21 ± 18 months. At last follow‐up, the Burke‐Fahn‐Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) motor score improved by 86% ± 14%, and the BFMDRS disability score improved by 80% ± 12%. Bilateral GPi‐DBS is a beneficial therapeutic option for the long‐term relief of tardive dystonia. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society     

Pallidal stimulation in advanced Parkinson's patients with contraindications for subthalamic stimulation

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bilateral pallidal (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) 6 months after surgery in advanced parkinsonian patients whose dopa‐resistant axial motor signs or cognitive decline constituted contraindications for subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS. Seventeen patients with a mean age of 59.3 ± 7.1 years (range, 45–70), mean disease duration of 12.5 ± 4.3 years (range, 7–20), and contraindications for STN DBS, underwent bilateral GPi DBS. They were evaluated before surgery and 6 months afterward, in accordance with Core Assessment Program for Intracerebral Transplantation recommendations. There were mean improvements of 41.1% in the UPDRS III motor score in the off‐dopa condition and 20.3% in the activities of daily living score. Motor fluctuations were reduced by 22.9% and dyskinesias by 68.6%. Axial motor signs improved in the off‐dopa condition by 34.2%. Neuropsychological performances remained unchanged at the 6‐month assessment. Bilateral GPi DBS is both safe and effective in advanced parkinsonian patients with untreatable motor fluctuations, for whom STN DBS is contraindicated due to dopa‐resistant axial motor signs or cognitive decline. As such, it should be regarded as a viable option for these patients. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Pallidal deep brain stimulation relieves camptocormia in primary dystonia

Camptocormia, characterised by a forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine may occur in various movement disorders, mainly in Parkinson’s disease or in primary dystonia. In severe cases, patients with camptocormia are unable to walk. While treatment options are limited, deep brain stimulation (DBS) with bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus internus (GPi) has been proposed as a therapeutic option in refractory cases of Parkinson’s disease. Here we present two patients with severe camptocormia as an isolated form of dystonia and as part of generalised dystonia, respectively, which were both treated with bilateral stimulation of the GPi. Symptoms of dystonia were assessed using the Burke–Fahn–Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFM) before and during deep brain stimulation. In both patients there was a significant functional improvement following long-term bilateral GPi stimulation and both patients gained ability to walk. In the first patient with an isolated dystonic camptocormia the BFM motor subscore for the truncal flexion improved by 75 %. The total BFM motor score in the second patient with a camptocormia in generalised dystonia improved by 45 %, while the BFM score for truncal flexion improved by 87 %. In both patients the effect of the bilateral GPi stimulation on camptocormia was substantial, independent of generalisation of dystonia. Therefore, GPi DBS is a possible treatment option for this rare disease.     

Surgical targets for dystonic tremor: Considerations between the globus pallidus and ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus

Dystonic tremor (DT) is characterized by coexisting tremor and abnormal dystonic posturing in the same segment. DT is often medically refractory and DBS is an important therapeutic option. However, the optimal surgical target for DT remains uncertain with Vim, GPi and zona incerta previously reported as effective. We retrospectively reviewed the outcome data from all patients with DT involving at least one upper extremity who underwent DBS at Vanderbilt University from July 2006 to July 2010. We evaluated the improvement of tremor and dystonia after their response to DBS was judged to be maximal. Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. Vim was targeted in four patients and three had unilateral procedure and one bilateral Vim DBS. GPi was targeted in four patients with bilateral DBS procedure in every patient from this subgroup. A combined bilateral GPi and unilateral Vim DBS was performed in two patients. The best results for tremor control were observed in patients with Vim DBS but they had persisting mild dystonia. Patients with GPi DBS had average DT improvement by approximately 50% but their dystonia symptoms were markedly improved. We propose that the patients with DT with a mild dystonia should be considered for Vim DBS procedure and the coexistence of severe DT and dystonia may be successfully controlled by combined GPi and Vim DBS surgeries.     

Pallidal vs subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus interna (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been reported to relieve motor symptoms and levodopa-induced dyskinesia in patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD). Although it has been suggested that stimulation of the STN may be superior to stimulation of the GPi, comparative trials are limited. OBJECTIVE: To extend our randomized, blinded pilot comparison of the safety and efficacy of STN and GPi stimulation in patients with advanced PD. DESIGN: This study represents the combined results from our previously published, randomized, blinded, parallel-group pilot study and additional patients enrolled in our single-center extension study. SETTING: Oregon Health and Science University in Portland.Patients Twenty-three patients with idiopathic PD, levodopa-induced dyskinesia, and response fluctuations were randomized to implantation of bilateral GPi or STN stimulators. Patients and evaluating clinicians were blinded to stimulation site. All patients were tested preoperatively while taking and not taking medications and after 3, 6, and 12 months of DBS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperatively, response of symptoms to DBS, medication, and combined medication and DBS was evaluated. Twenty patients (10 in the GPi group and 10 in the STN group) completed 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Off-medication Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor scores were improved after 12 months of both GPi and STN stimulation (39% vs 48%). Bradykinesia tended to improve more with STN than GPi stimulation. No improvement in on-medication function was observed in either group. Levodopa dose was reduced by 38% in STN stimulation patients compared with 3% in GPi stimulation patients (P = .08). Dyskinesia was reduced by stimulation at both GPi and STN (89% vs 62%). Cognitive and behavioral complications were observed only in combination with STN stimulation. CONCLUSION: Stimulation of either the GPi or STN improves many features of advanced PD. It is premature to exclude GPi as an appropriate target for DBS in patients with advanced disease.     

Deep brain stimulation for generalised dystonia and spasmodic torticollis.

Dystonia appears distinct from the other tremulous disorders in that improvement following deep brain stimulation frequently appears in a delayed and progressive manner. The rate of this improvement and the point at which no further progress can be expected are presently unknown. The establishment of these parameters is important in the provision of accurate and relevant prognostic information to these patients, their carers, and their treating physicians. We studied 12 consecutive patients with generalised dystonia (n=6) and spasmodic torticollis (n=6) who underwent bilateral globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Standard rating scales were used to quantify their neurological improvement. Both groups experienced a statistically significant improvement in their rating scores at both one and two years following surgery. At 2 years follow-up, the spasmodic torticollis group exhibited a 59% improvement in their total Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticoilis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) rating score and the generalised dystonia group attained a 46% improvement in their overall Burke, Fahn and Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) evaluation. Ninety-five percent of the final improvement was attained by 6.4 months in the generalised dystonia group and by 6.6 months in those with spasmodic torticollis. There was no significant improvement after one year postoperatively. These findings add further support to GPi DBS as an effective treatment for generalised dystonia and spasmodic torticollis, and furnish important information as to the expected rate of improvement and the point at which no further gains can be reasonably anticipated.     

Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of severe dystonia

A retrospective study of a consecutive series of 19 patients with medically intractable dystonia treated with uni- or bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) is reported. A minimal follow-up of 6 months was available, up to eleven years in one patient. The first twelve consecutive patients (4 with primary and 8 with secondary dystonia) were treated with chronic stimulation of the posterior part of the ventrolateral thalamic nucleus (VLp). In this group global functional outcome was improved in 8 patients, although dystonia movement and disability scale scores did not show significant improvement. Of the 12 patients treated first by VLp DBS, three (1 primary and 2 secondary dystonia) underwent pallidal (GPi) DBS after the VLp DBS failed to improve their symptoms. The last seven consecutive patients (5 primary and 2 secondary dystonia) were treated directly with GPi DBS. Extracranial infection prevented chronic GPi DBS in one patient. In another GPi patient, preliminary negative tests with the electrodes discouraged implantation of the stimulators, and the patient was not treated with chronic DBS. In the remaining group of eight patients including those previously treated with VLp DBS, chronic GPi DBS resulted in a significant improvement in the dystonia movement scale and disability scores. Although this is a retrospective study dealing with dystonia of heterogeneous etiology, the results strongly suggest that GPi DBS has a better outcome than VLp DBS Received: 22 January 2001 / Received in revised form: 28 February 2001 / Accepted: 1 March 2001     

Long‐term results of a multicenter study on subthalamic and pallidal stimulation in Parkinson's disease

We report the 5 to 6 year follow‐up of a multicenter study of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Thirty‐five STN patients and 16 GPi patients were assessed at 5 to 6 years after DBS surgery. Primary outcome measure was the stimulation effect on the motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) assessed with a prospective cross‐over double‐blind assessment without medications (stimulation was randomly switched on or off). Secondary outcomes were motor UPDRS changes with unblinded assessments in off‐ and on‐medication states with and without stimulation, activities of daily living (ADL), anti‐PD medications, and dyskinesias. In double‐blind assessment, both STN and GPi DBS were significantly effective in improving the motor UPDRS scores (STN, P < 0.0001, 45.4%; GPi, P = 0.008, 20.0%) compared with off‐stimulation, regardless of the sequence of stimulation. In open assessment, both STN‐ and GPi‐DBS significantly improved the off‐medication motor UPDRS when compared with before surgery (STN, P < 0.001, 50.5%; GPi, P = 0.002, 35.6%). Dyskinesias and ADL were significantly improved in both groups. Anti‐PD medications were significantly reduced only in the STN group. Adverse events were more frequent in the STN group. These results confirm the long‐term efficacy of STN and GPi DBS in advanced PD. Although the surgical targets were not randomized, there was a trend to a better outcome of motor signs in the STN‐DBS patients and fewer adverse events in the GPi‐DBS group. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Deep brain stimulation for camptocormia in dystonia and Parkinson’s disease

Camptocormia, or “bent spine syndrome”, may occur in various movement disorders such as primary dystonia or idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD). Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment in refractory primary dystonia and advanced PD, few data are available on the effect of DBS on camptocormia comparing these two conditions. Seven patients (4 with dystonia, 3 with PD; mean age 60.3 years at surgery, range 39–73 years) with camptocormia were included in the study. Five patients underwent bilateral GPi DBS and two patients underwent bilateral STN DBS guided by CT-stereotactic surgery and microelectrode recording. Pre- and postoperative motor assessment included the BFM in the dystonia patients and the UPDRS in the PD patients. Severity of camptocormia was assessed by the BFM subscore for the trunk at the last available follow-up at a mean of 17.3 months (range 9–36 months). There were no surgical complications. In the four patients with dystonia there was a mean improvement of 53% in the BFM motor score (range 41–79%) and of 63% (range 50–67%) in the BFM subscore for the trunk at the last available follow-up (mean 14.3 months, range 9–18 months). In the three patients with camptocormia in PD who underwent bilateral STN DBS (2 patients) or pallidal DBS (1 patient), the PD symptoms improved markedly (mean improvement in the UPDRS motor subscore stimulation on/medication off 55%, range 49–61%), but there was no or only mild improvement of camptocormia in the two patients who underwent STN DBS, and only moderate improvement in the patient with GPi DBS at the last available follow-up (mean 21 months, range 12–36 months). GPi DBS is an effective treatment for camptocormia in dystonia. The response of camptocormia to chronic STN or GPi DBS in PD is more heterogenous. The latter may be due to a variety of causes and needs further clarification.     

Pallidal and thalamic deep brain stimulation in myoclonus‐dystonia

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the internal globus pallidus (GPi) and ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (VIM) are established treatment options in primary dystonia and tremor syndromes and have been reported anecdotally to be efficacious in myoclonus‐dystonia (MD). We investigated short‐ and long‐term effects on motor function, cognition, affective state, and quality of life (QoL) of GPi‐ and VIM‐DBS in MD. Ten MD‐patients (nine ε‐sarcoglycan‐mutation‐positive) were evaluated pre‐ and post‐surgically following continuous bilateral GPi‐ and VIM‐DBS at four time points: presurgical, 6, 12, and as a last follow‐up at a mean of 62.3 months postsurgically, and in OFF‐, GPi‐, VIM‐, and GPi‐VIM‐DBS conditions by validated motor [unified myoclonus rating scale (UMRS), TSUI Score, Burke‐Fahn‐Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS)], cognitive, affective, and QoL‐scores. MD‐symptoms significantly improved at 6 months post‐surgery (UMRS: 61.5%, TSUI Score: 36.5%, BFMDRS: 47.3%). Beneficial effects were sustained at long‐term evaluation post‐surgery (UMRS: 65.5%, TSUI Score: 35.1%, BFMDRS: 48.2%). QoL was significantly ameliorated; affective status and cognition remained unchanged postsurgically irrespective of the stimulation conditions. No serious long‐lasting stimulation‐related adverse events (AEs) were observed. Both GPi‐ and VIM‐DBS offer equally effective and safe treatment options for MD. With respect to fewer adverse, stimulation‐induced events of GPi‐DBS in comparison with VIM‐DBS, GPi‐DBS seems to be preferable. Combined GPi‐VIM‐DBS can be useful in cases of incapaciting myoclonus, refractory to GPi‐DBS alone. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation in Primary Cervical Dystonia with Phasic Type : Clinical Outcome and Postoperative Course

Objective

The purpose of this study was to analyze in detail the relationship between outcome and time course of effect in medically refractory primary cervical dystonia (CD) with phasic type that was treated by bilateral globus pallidus internus (Gpi) deep brain stimulation (DBS).

Methods

Six patients underwent bilateral implantation of DBS into the Gpi under the guide of microelectrode recording and were followed for 18.7 ± 11.1 months. The mean duration of the CD was 5.8 ± 3.4 years. The mean age at time of surgery was 54.2 ± 10.2 years. Patients were evaluated with the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and relief scale using patient self-reporting.

Results

The TWSTRS total scores improved by 64.5%, 65.5%, 75.8%, and 76.0% at 3, 6, 12 months, and at the last available follow-up after surgery, respectively. Statistically significant improvements in the TWSTRS scores were observed 3 months after surgery (p = 0.028) with gradual improvement up to 12 months after surgery, thereafter, the improvement was sustained. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the scores at 3 and 12 months. Subjective improvement reported averaged 81.7 ± 6.8% at last follow-up. Mild dysarthria, the most frequent adverse event, occurred in 3 patients.

Conclusions

Our results show that the bilateral Gpi-DBS can offer a significant therapeutic effect from 3 months postoperatively in patients with primary CD with phasic type, without significant side effects.     

Greater improvement in quality of life following unilateral deep brain stimulation surgery in the globus pallidus as compared to the subthalamic nucleus

While deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is a well-accepted treatment for Parkinson disease (PD) that improves overall quality of life (QoL), its effects across different domains of QoL are unclear. The study reported here directly compared the effects of unilateral DBS in subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus (GPi) on QoL in 42 non-demented patients with medication-refractory PD. Patients were enrolled in the COMPARE trial, a randomized clinical trial of cognitive and mood effects of STN versus GPi DBS conducted at the University of Florida Movement Disorders Center. Patients underwent motor, mood, verbal fluency and QoL (Parkinson disease questionnaire: PDQ-39) measures before and 6 months following surgery. Groups experienced motor and mood improvements that did not differ by target. Patients with STN DBS evidenced a slight decrement on letter fluency. On average, all patients endorsed better overall QoL after surgery. However, despite similar motor and mood improvements, GPi patients improved more than STN patients (38 vs. 14%, respectively; P = 0.03). Patients reported better QoL on subscales of mobility, activities of daily living (ADLs), emotional well-being, stigma, cognition and discomfort, but not on those of social support and communication. Improvements on the mobility, ADLs, stigma and social support subscales were greater amongst GPi patients. In regression analyses, only depression changes independently predicted changes in overall QoL as well as emotional well-being and social support changes. Within the STN group only, declining category fluency scores correlated with poorer QoL on the communication subscale. Unilateral DBS in both STN and GPi improved QoL overall and in disparate domains 6 months after surgery. Patients receiving GPi DBS reported greater improvements that cannot be explained by differential mood or motor effects; however, verbal fluency changes may have partially contributed to lesser QoL improvements amongst STN patients.     

Comparison of weight gain and energy intake after subthalamic versus pallidal stimulation in Parkinson's disease

To compare body mass index (BMI) and daily energy intake (DEI) after subthalamic versus pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS). Weight gain following DBS in Parkinson's disease patients remains largely unexplained and no comparison of subthalamic and pallidal (GPi) stimulation has yet been performed. BMI and DEI, dopaminergic drug administration and motor scores were recorded in 46 patients with PD before STN (n = 32) or GPi (n = 14) DBS and 3 and 6 months after. At M6, BMI had increased by an average of 8.4% in the STN group and 3.2% in the GPi group. BMI increased in 28 STN and 9 GPi patients. This increase was significantly higher in the STN group (P < 0.048) and the difference remained significant after adjustment for reduced dopaminergic medication; 28.6% of GPi patients were overweight at 6 months (14.3% preoperatively) versus 37.5% of STN patients (21.9% preoperatively). Changes in BMI were negatively correlated with changes in dyskinesia in the GPi–DBS group. Food intake did not change in the two groups, either quantitatively or qualitatively. Frequent weight gain, inadequately explained by motor improvement or reduced dopaminergic drug dosage, occurred in subthalamic DBS patients. The difference between groups suggests additional factors in the STN group, such as homeostatic control center involvement. © 2009 Movement Disorder Society