Modulations of dose intensity of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in association with G-CSF and peripheral blood stem cells in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: comparative evaluation of completion and safety of three intensive regimens

The aim of this study was to evaluate and to compare in terms of toxicity the modulations of dose intensity of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin in adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer. Four cycles of sequential high-dose chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC), supported with G-CSF and peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were administered to 81 women. Three successive cohorts were studied: doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2)) + cyclophosphamide (3000 mg/m(2)) every 21 days (group 1), doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2)) + cyclophosphamide (3000 mg/m(2)) every 15 days (group 2), and doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2)) + cyclophosphamide (6000 mg/m(2)) every 21 days (group 3). Seventy-five patients received four cycles of treatment with a total of 310 cycles administered. The received dose intensity of doxorubicin was higher in group 2 and that of cyclophosphamide was lower in group 1 than in the other two groups. Hematological and extra-hematological toxicities, as well as the number and duration of hospitalizations for toxicity, were significantly higher in group 3. We conclude that the group 3 regimen is associated with toxicities comparable to autologous transplantation. Increasing dose intensity of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide is feasible in an outpatient setting and safe in groups 1 and 2 with the support of hematopoietic factor and PBSC.     

Pegase 03: a prospective randomized phase III trial of FEC with or without high-dose thiotepa, cyclophosphamide and autologous stem cell transplantation in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Pegase 03 is a multicenter prospective randomized phase III trial evaluating the impact of first-line high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with stem cell support on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and response rate in 308 patients with histologically proven metastatic breast cancer responding to induction therapy. Eligible patients received four induction cycles with FEC 100 (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2)). Patients with objective response (N=179) were randomized to one cycle of HDC (cyclophosphamide 6000 mg/m(2) and thiotepa 800 mg/m(2) (CHUT)) and stem cell support (N=88), or no further treatment (N=91). All patients were observed until disease progression or death. One toxic death occurred after CHUT. Other toxicities were manageable. The response rate at 3 months was higher in the intensification arm: 82.7% (25.3% complete response (CR)) versus 59.2% (14.1% CR) (P=0.0002). Median follow-up was 48 months. Median DFS was 11 and 6.6 months in the intensification and the observation arms, respectively (P=0.0001). There was no survival difference: 33.6 versus 27.3% OS at 3 years (P=0.8) and 22.9 versus 22.3 months median time to relapse in the intensification and observation arms, respectively. In this randomized trial, HDC with CHUT improved DFS but not OS, corroborating findings from earlier trials.     

Interleukin-2 and granulocyte–macrophage–colony-stimulating factor immunomodulation with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with metastatic breast cancer

Immunomodulation with cytokines was used to improve the result of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC)/autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHST). We examined the use of IL-2 and growth factors for mobilization, ex vivo activation of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) and maintenance therapy after HDC/AHST in metastatic breast cancer. Eligible patients with metastatic breast cancer for HDC/AHST were assigned to 1 of 3 protocols for PBSC mobilization: G-CSF (group 1); IL-2 + G-CSF (group 2); or IL-2 + G-CSF + GM–CSF (group 3). HDC with cyclophosphamide, carmustine and thiotepa was given from day ?7 to ?5. PBSCs were treated ex vivo with IL-2 for 24 h and reinfused on day 0. Maintenance therapy included low-dose IL-2, followed by 2 courses of intermediate-dose IL-2. GM–CSF was given from day 1 until neutrophil recovery. Thirty-four patients (10 in group 1, 14 in group 2, and 10 in group 3) were included. Comparable numbers of CD34⁺ cells were collected from all 3 groups; incremental increases of CD3⁺ cells were collected from groups 1 to 2 and to 3 (p = 0.03). Major adverse effects from IL-2 were fever, hypotension and fatigue; no treatment-related mortality was seen. At a median follow-up of 790.5 days (range 150–2,722 days), median progression-free survival was 434 days and median overall survival was 1,432 days. Estimated 3-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 31 and 57%. Our study suggested that the use of IL-2 and growth factors immunomodulation with HDC/AHST was feasible with comparable survival rates.     

A short course of induction chemotherapy followed by two cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue for chemotherapy naive metastatic breast cancer: sequential phase I/II studies

Two cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support (HDC) may increase the total dose delivered and dose intensity. A brief induction phase and different non-cross-resistant agents for each HDC cycle were used to avoid drug resistance. Twenty-six women with metastatic BC had induction and stem cell mobilization with two cycles of doxorubicin/G-CSF given every 14 days. Patients with stable disease or better after induction received HD CTCb followed by HD melphalan and dose-escalated paclitaxel. At 475 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel by 24-h infusion, dose-limiting transient peripheral sensory neuropathy was encountered. No toxic deaths occurred. Complete and near complete response after completion of therapy was achieved in 22 (85%) of 26 patients. The median EFS was 38 months. The median OS has not yet been reached. At a median follow-up of 33 (25-43) months, actuarial EFS and OS were 54% (95% confidence interval (CI), 39-69%) and 69% (95% CI, 56-79%), respectively. This double transplant approach lasts only 14 weeks and is feasible, safe, and tolerable. Whilst selection biases may in part contribute to favorable EFS and OS, a randomized comparison of standard therapy vs double transplant in both metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer is warranted.     

A phase II study of two cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support in patients with metastatic breast cancer who meet eligibility criteria for a single cycle

Multi-cycle high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support (HDC-ASCS) may improve the results obtained with single-cycle HDC-ASCS in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the tolerability and efficacy of additional cycles of HDC-ASCS in patients selected using standard eligibility criteria for single cycle HDC-ASCS is uncertain. Twenty-nine patients with MBC and a CR or PR to induction chemotherapy were selected by standard institutional eligibility criteria for single-cycle HDC-ASCS. Cycle 1 HDC-ASCS (cyclophosphamide 6 g/m2; mitoxantrone 70 mg/m2; carboplatin 800 mg/m2) was followed by a planned second cycle (etoposide 1.6 g/m2; thiotepa 800 mg/m2; carboplatin 800 mg/m2 modulated by tamoxifen 120 mg/m2/day x 5 days) with a median interval of 3.2 months. CR rate was 20% after induction chemotherapy and 33% and 54% after HDC cycles I and II, respectively. Sixteen patients (55%) failed to complete HDC cycle II within 200 days because of disease progression, toxicity, inadequate stem cell collection, insurance denials or patient choice. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for all 29 patients entered is 301 days from date of HDC cycle I and actuarial PFS at 2 years is 35%. For the 13 patients who received the two cycles of HDC-ASCS, actuarial PFS at 2 years was 54% (P = NS compared to those receiving only one cycle). These data show that a second cycle of full-dose intensity HDC-ASCS may increase the proportion of patients with MBC that achieve CR and may increase PFS. However, a large proportion of patients that complete HDC-ASCS cycle I may fail to proceed to cycle II in a timely fashion. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 519-524.     

Femoral head necrosis in three patients with relapsed ovarian cancer receiving high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

We report three patients with relapsed ovarian cancer who developed femoral head necrosis requiring endoprosthetic hip surgery 16-35 months after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with treosulfan (47 and 56 g/m(2) body-surface area (BSA)) given as 3-25 h infusions and followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation. One woman received two courses of single agent treosulfan while the other two patients received one course of high-dose treosulfan either preceded or followed by high-dose carboplatin, etoposide and cyclophosphamide. A total of 30 women with ovarian cancer were treated with HDC at our unit and 21 of them received treosulfan-containing regimens. Femoral head necrosis was not observed in patients either receiving conditioning regimens without treosulfan (n=9) or when the total treosulfan dose was given over 3 consecutive days (n=3) or in patients with a diagnosis other than ovarian cancer and treated with high-dose treosulfan (n=10). We conclude that women with relapsed ovarian cancer receiving HDC with excessive single-dose treosulfan might be at an increased risk of developing bone necrosis.     

High-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support for stage IIIB inflammatory carcinoma of the breast

The purpose of this study was to determine outcomes for 56 patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) receiving high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin (CTCb) with peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support. All patients received the same total amount of chemotherapy but there were differences in the sequence of therapy: 15 received induction chemotherapy, chemotherapy mobilization of PBSC and CTCb after surgery (adjuvant group) while 41 received induction chemotherapy with (n = 17) or without (n = 24) chemotherapy for mobilization of PBSC prior to surgery and CTCb after surgery (neoadjuvant group). Median time from diagnosis to HDC was 5.5 months (range 3.5-12.5). Fifty-one patients (91%) required admission to the hospital following HDC for a median of 11 days (range 5-25). There were two (4%) infectious deaths after HDC. Twenty-four patients (43%) have relapsed at a median of 18 months (range 8-50) from diagnosis resulting in death in 34%. The probabilities of overall (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) at 3 years for all 56 patients were 0.72 and 0.53, respectively, with a median follow-up of 44 months (range 15-76) from diagnosis. There were no differences in OS, EFS or patterns of relapse between patients in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant groups. These sequences of combined modality therapy incorporating HDC are comparable or superior to other intensive approaches for the treatment of IBC. Further improvements will be necessary to decrease systemic recurrences.     

In vivo depletion of B cells using a combination of high-dose cytosine arabinoside/mitoxantrone and rituximab for autografting in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

We performed a pilot study including rituximab (Mabthera; IDEC-C2B8, Hoffmann-La Roche) with a sequential high-dose therapy protocol in 15 patients with follicular and three patients with mantle cell lymphoma and studied the potential of the chemoimmunotherapy to induce depletion of malignant B cells in vivo. Our treatment protocol included induction with three cycles of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) chemotherapy, followed by peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization using high-dose cytosine arabinoside (2 g/m2 every 12 h, days 1 and 2) and mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2, days 2 and 3) (HAM), preceeded by rituximab (375 mg/m2). The proportion of CD19+ B cells in blood and bone marrow decreased from 1.2 +/- 0.4% to 0.13 +/- 0. 1% (P = 0.01) and from 2.7 +/- 0.8% to 0.8 +/- 0.5% (P = 0.03) respectively. The number of t(14;18)-positive cells in blood and bone marrow progressively decreased with treatment, as assessed by the quantitative real-time PCR assay in four patients. Conversion to PCR-negativity was achieved in the peripheral blood (PB) of seven informative patients. Leucaphereses were performed during the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-supported leucocyte recovery phase. In 17 of 18 patients, a median of 15.1 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight (BW) could be harvested by a single procedure for enrichment by an immunomagnetic method. Leucapheresis products contained 51.3 +/- 28.8 x 104 CD19+ B cells/kg BW (mean) and were t(14;18) PCR negative in all seven informative patients. These data compare favourably with results obtained in patients treated with the same regimen without rituximab. The high-dose therapy (n = 12 patients), including total body irradiation (14.4 Gy) and cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg BW), was also preceeded by rituximab. Recovery of neutrophils to > 0.5 x 109/l and of platelets to > 20 x 109/l required a median of 13.5 and 11.5 d (range 11-24 and 9-24 d) respectively. In conclusion, the addition of the CD20 antibody to chemotherapy ensured tumour depletion in vivo and allowed the collection of PBSCs devoid of tumour cells and with conserved engraftment capability.     

High-dose mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide without stem cell support in high-risk and advanced solid tumors: a phase I trial

This phase I study was designed to develop a high-dose combination of two cycles of mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide in patients with solid tumors, as an alternative to single-cycle high-dose regimens that use only alkylating agents. Treatment was delivered with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), but without stem cell support, in order to avoid potential tumor cell reinfusion. Thirty-one patients with advanced solid tumors received two cycles of high-dose mitoxantrone (20-30 mg/m2) plus high-dose cyclophosphamide (3000-4000 mg/m2). All patients received G-CSF until hematologic recovery. Dose-escalation was performed when less than 50% of cycles per level had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) achieved was mitoxantrone 25 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4000 mg/m2. Main dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were hematological: grade IV neutropenia lasting more than 7 days and thrombopenia below 20 x 10(9)/l requiring more than one platelet transfusion. Non-hematological DLT consisted predominantly of grade III emesis and asthenia. Follow-up after each cycle was performed in an outpatient setting and there were no toxic deaths. In conclusion, the administration of two cycles of high-dose mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide with G-CSF support is safe and feasible. MTD was mitoxantrone 25 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4000 mg/m2. Evaluation of this regimen is being done in a phase II trial.     

Thrombotic microangiopathy: a new dose-limiting toxicity of high-dose sequential chemotherapy

Ten patients with refractory (n = 8) or early relapsing (n = 2) aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were enrolled in a pilot study evaluating a high-dose sequential chemotherapy regimen with peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support. Five treatment phases were scheduled: phase I (cyclophosphamide + etoposide followed by lenograstim (G-CSF), and a PBSC harvest); phase II (cisplatinum + cytarabine + etoposide followed by lenograstim); phases III and IV (cyclophosphamide + cytarabine + etoposide followed by autologous PBSC infusion and lenograstim); and phase V (carmustine + cytarabine + etoposide + melphalan followed by autologous PBSC infusion and lenograstim). Ten, nine, eight, six and four of the 10 patients received one, two, three, four and five of the five scheduled phases of treatment, respectively. Four patients were withdrawn from the study due to progressive disease and two due to thrombotic microangiopathy (TM). Moreover, in the four patients who completed all treatment phases, an additional case of TM was seen. In all three patients with TM, laboratory studies showed evidence of Coombs negative hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, renal dysfunction and in addition cardiac failure in two patients. TM may be a new dose-limiting toxicity of high-dose sequential chemotherapy followed by repeated PBSC transplantation.     

A short course of induction chemotherapy followed by two cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue for chemotherapy naive metastatic breast cancer

A single cycle of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support (HDC) in women with responsive metastatic breast cancer (BC) consistently achieves over 50% complete and near complete response (CR/nCR). This significant cytoreduction results in a median event-free survival (EFS) of 8 months, and approximately 20% 3-year and 16% 5-year EFS in selected patients. To improve long-term outcomes, new strategies to treat minimal residual tumor burden are needed. Increased total dose delivered can be achieved with two cycles of HDC. Critical design issues include shortening induction chemotherapy to avoid development of drug resistance and the use of different agents for each HDC cycle. We have determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for paclitaxel combined with high-dose melphalan in the context of a double transplant and explored the impact of a short induction phase. Between June 1994 and August 1996, we enrolled 32 women with metastatic BC on to this phase I double transplant trial. Induction consisted of doxorubicin 30 mg/m2/day days 1-3 given for 2 cycles every 14 days with G-CSF 5 microg/kg s.c. days 4-12. Stem cell collection was performed by leukapheresis in each cycle when the WBC recovered to above 1000/microl. Patients with stable disease or better response to induction were eligible to proceed with HDC. HDC regimen I (TxM) included paclitaxel with dose escalation from 0 to 300 mg/m2 given on day 1 and melphalan 180 mg/m2 in two divided doses given on day 3. HDC regimen II was CTCb (cyclophosphamide 6 g/m2, thiotepa 500 mg/m2, and carboplatin 800 mg/m2 total doses) delivered by 96-h continuous infusion. At the first dose level of 150 mg/m2 paclitaxel by 3 h infusion, four of five patients developed dose-limiting toxicity consisting of diffuse skin erythema and capillary leak syndrome. Only two of these five completed the second transplant. Subsequently, paclitaxel was delivered by 24-h continuous infusion together with 96 h of dexamethasone and histamine receptor blockade. This particular toxicity was not observed again. No toxic deaths occurred and dose-limiting toxicity was not encountered. Three patients were removed from study prior to transplant: one for insurance refusal and two for disease progression. All others completed both cycles of transplant. Complete and near complete response (CR/nCR) after completion of therapy was achieved in 23 (72%) of 32 patients. The median EFS is 26 months. The median overall survival has not yet been reached. At a median follow-up of 58 months, EFS and overall survival are 41% and 53%, respectively. This double transplant approach is feasible, safe, and tolerable. Treatment duration is only 14 weeks and eliminates lengthy induction chemotherapy. The observed event-free and overall survivals are promising and are better than expected following a single transplant. Whilst selection biases may in part contribute to this effect, a much larger phase II double transplant trial is warranted in preparation for a potential randomized comparison of standard therapy vs single vs double transplant.     

Multidisciplinary therapy including high-dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for invasive thymoma

We describe two patients with invasive thymomas who responded to high-dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) combined with surgery and radiotherapy. The first patient was a 42-year-old man admitted to the hospital with chest pain, and the second patient was a 45-year-old man admitted with myasthenia gravis. Both patients had nonresectable thymomas (stage IVa) because of invasion of the aorta, pulmonary artery, or both, and dissemination to the pericardium. They initially received two cycles of chemotherapy consisting of adriamycin (40 mg/m(2), day 1), cisplatin (50 mg/m(2), day 1), vincristine (0.6 mg/m(2), day 3), and cyclophosphamide (700 mg/m(2), day 4) at 3-week intervals. Four weeks later, they were administered high-dose etoposide (300 mg/m(2), days 1 to 5) followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) [50 micro g/m(2)/d] subcutaneously to mobilize stem cells into the blood. After two additional cycles of adriamycin, cisplatin, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide (ADOC), the patients received high-dose ifosfamide (1.5 g/m(2), days 1 to 4), carboplatin (400 mg/m(2), days 3 to 5), and etoposide (200 mg/m(2), days 1 to 5) followed by PBSCT. They were administered G-CSF (50 micro g/m(2)/d) after PBSCT, with subsequent rapid recovery of neutrophil and platelet level. The tumors shrank remarkably, and could be excised completely in both patients. Postoperatively, 50 Gy of irradiation was administered. Disease-free status has been maintained for 5 years in the first patient and 2 years in the second patient. Our findings suggest that high-dose ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide followed by PBSCT in combination with an ADOC regimen, surgery, and radiotherapy is very effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced nonresectable thymoma.     

Successful peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with etoposide (VP-16) in patients with relapsed or resistant lymphoma who failed cyclophosphamide mobilization.

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous blood stem cell transplantation is considered the treatment of choice for patients with relapsed or resistant aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin's disease (HD). However, several authors report failure of standard mobilization regimens in 29% to 56% of these patients making the completion of HDCT impossible and as a result, negatively influencing long-term outcome. Thus, effective new regimens for patients failing initial mobilization are needed. Here we report the results of using etoposide as a mobilizing agent in 16 patients with primary resistant or relapsed malignant lymphoma who had failed prior mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) followed by G-CSF. The use of etoposide 500 mg/m2 (days 1-4) + G-CSF resulted in the successful collection of adequate numbers of PBSC with a median harvest of 3.6 x 10(6)/kg (range 2.2-12.6) CD34+ cells in all 16 patients. In 7/16 (44%) patients, the target yield of at least 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells was harvested by a single apheresis and the maximum number of separations for all patients was two. No excessive toxicities appeared, allowing all patients to proceed to myeloablative chemotherapy. In addition, median peak values of circulating CD34+ cells were significantly higher after etoposide as compared to cyclophosphamide (49.2/microl vs 4.7/microl; P = 0.0004). These results indicate that etoposide + G-CSF is a highly effective mobilization regimen in patients who have failed cyclophosphamide mobilization.     

Cyclophosphamide, etoposide and carboplatine plus non-cryopreserved autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation rescue for patients with refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

A simplified schedule of high-dose chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/day for 2 days), etoposide (15 mg/kg/day for 2 days) and carboplatine (400 mg/m(2)/day for 2 days), together with autologous non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells was used for treatment of relapsed (29 patients) and refractory (three patients) patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The use of such granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) after high-dose myeloablative therapy resulted in a rapid, complete and sustained hematopoietic recovery. The median time to achieve an absolute neutrophil count greater than 0.5 x 10(9)/l was 12 days (range 8-17 days). The median time to self-sustained platelet count greater than 20 x 10(9)/l was 14 days (range 7-19 days). Fifteen of the 32 patients (49%) were alive and disease free at a median follow-up of 18 months (range 10-96 months) for all surviving patients. The estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) for all patients were 50 and 43%, respectively. Twelve patients died of relapse or progressive disease, two patients died of infection and one patient died of cardiac cause. The median time to relapse was 12 months (5-27) from PBSC infusion. High-dose chemotherapy with short-duration chemotherapy and non-cryopreserved bone marrow (BM) is an effective and safe treatment modality for patients with relapsed or resistant NHL.     

Cardiac sequelae of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as induction chemotherapy prior to high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in women with high-risk primary or metastatic breast cancer

Doxorubicin plus paclitaxel has been shown to be an active regimen for metastatic breast cancer and is now frequently used as adjuvant therapy for high-risk primary breast cancer. Initial studies reported a higher than expected rate of cardiac toxicity with this regimen. We studied 105 patients with either high-risk primary breast cancer or metastatic breast cancer who were treated with doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and 3-h infusions of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) cycled every 3 weeks. Patients received three cycles of chemotherapy for high-risk primary or four cycles for metastatic disease. Patients then proceeded to high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) (STAMP I cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and carmustine) and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT). Patients underwent radionuclide multi-gated angiograms (MUGA) before and following induction chemotherapy and following HDC. During induction chemotherapy 40 (38%) of the patients had a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Fourteen had a decrease of 20% or greater and two were mildly symptomatic from CHF. There was additional reduction in the LVEF after HDC with a median value for LVEF of 59% (range, 20-78%). During HDC 10 patients developed clinical signs of congestive heart failure (CHF). Five patients responded to diuretic therapy and did not require any additional treatment. Four patients responded to vasodilation and/or digoxin with improvement in cardiac function. A clinically significant decrease in cardiac function was found in a small number of patients after induction chemotherapy and HDC with PBPCT. The majority of the patients tolerated this regimen without problems. Although there was a decline in LVEF as measured by radionuclide MUGA this did not prevent the majority of patients from proceeding with HDC. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000).     

A multicenter early phase II study of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for treatment of intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Japan Blood Cell Transplantation Study Group

We conducted a multicenter early phase II study to evaluate the feasibility and therapeutic efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (auto-PBSCT) for the treatment of intermediate grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (IG-NHL). High-dose etoposide or cyclophosphamide followed by G-CSF was used for PBSC mobilization, and a sufficient number of CD34+ cells (> 1 x 10(6)/kg) were collected. Out of 81 enrolled patients, 50 received high-dose chemotherapy with auto-PBSCT; Hematologic recovery after transplantation was rapid. The incidence of grade III/IV toxicity (Bearman) was about 6%; treatment-related mortality was 6% (3/50). The Disease-free survival rate for the patients in complete remission who received high-dose chemotherapy with auto-PBSCT was better than that for the patients who were treated with conventional chemotherapy (57% vs 35%). These preliminary results indicated that high-dose chemotherapy with auto-PBSCT is feasible and effective. A prospective randomized phase III clinical trial will be required to assess the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy with auto-PBSCT as a post-remission therapy for IG-NHL.     

Bone Marrow Transplantation: Prognostic Factors of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization with Cyclophosphamide and Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF): The CD34+ Cell Dose Positively Affects the Time to Hematopoietic Recovery and Supportive Requirements after High-Dose Chemotherapy

To prospectively analyze factors that influence peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection and hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC), 39 patients received cyclophosphamide 4 g/m(2) and rHuG-CSF (Filgrastim) 5 &mgr;g/kg/day. Leukapheresis was started when CD34(+) cells/mL were > 5 x 10(3). A minimum of 2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg was collected. Median steady-state bone marrow CD34(+) cell percentage was 0.8% (range, 0.1 to 6). Thirty-two patients received HDC with autologous PBSC transplantation plus Filgrastim. A median of 2 (range, 0 to 6) leukapheresis per patient were performed and a median of 6.3 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg (range, 0 to 44.4) collected; four patients failed to mobilize CD34(+) cells. The number of cycles of prior chemotherapy had an inverse correlation with the number CD34(+) cells/kg collected (r = -0.38; p < 0.005). Patients with <7 cycles had a higher predictability for onset of leukapheresis than patients with (3) 7 (93% versus 50%; p < 0.005). The four patients who failed to mobilize had received >/=7 cycles. The number of CD34(+) cells/kg infused after HDC had an inverse correlation with days to recovery to 0.5 x 10(9) neutrophils/L and 20 x 10(9) platelets/L (r = -0.68 and -0.56; p < 0.005). The effect of these factors on mobilization and hematopoietic recovery were confirmed by multivariate analysis. Requirements for supportive measures were significantly lower in patients given a higher dose of CD34(+) cells/kg. Therefore, PBSC collection should be planned early in the course of chemotherapy. Larger number of CD34(+) cells/kg determined a more rapid hematopoietic recovery and a decrease of required supportive measures.     

Scoring system for the prediction of successful peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): application in clinical practice

Fifty-six patients with chemosensitive NHL were studied to assess factors affecting mobilization and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection: all were mobilized with high-dose cyclophosphamide and etoposide and G-CSF 5 microg/kg/day. None of them had bone marrow involvement at the time of mobilization or a history of extended field irradiation. Previous chemotherapy regimens were divided into two groups: moderately myelotoxic chemotherapy (MMC) and highly myelotoxic chemotherapy (HMC). The adequacy of the PBSC harvest was not associated with age, gender, a past history of bone marrow involvement or disease status. In contrast, the number of MMC cycles (n(MMC)) and the number of HMC cycles (n(HMC)) were both significant (P = 0.009 and P = 0.0004, respectively) and were used to compute a score predictive of a successful PBSC harvest: SCORE = n(MMC) + 4 n(HMC). The estimated successful PBSC collection rate was greater than 80% in patients with a score ranging from 0 to 15 and dropped rapidly to below 20% in patients with a score exceeding 25. This scoring system may help to determine the timing of PBSC mobilization in patients with a score below 15 and suggests that new PBSC mobilization procedures should be investigated in other patients. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 495-499.     

Peripheral blood stem cell transplants for multiple myeloma: identification of favorable variables for rapid engraftment in 225 patients

Transfusion of autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) of good quality ensures fast hematopoietic engraftment after myeloablative therapy with a decrease in procedure-related morbidity and mortality. We have analyzed variables influencing the kinetics of engraftment, and therefore reflecting the quality of PBSC collections, in 225 patients with newly diagnosed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) who received an autotransplant in support of high dose melphalan (200 mg/m2); 132 of these patients also completed a second transplant. All PBSCs were collected before the first transplant after high-dose cyclophosphamide (6 g/m2) and hematopoietic growth factors, mainly granulocyte- macrophage colony-stimulating factor. PBSCs were administered either alone (91 patients) or with bone marrow (134 patients). A highly significant correlation was observed between the number of CD34+ cells per kilogram infused and prompt recovery of both granulocytes (P = .0001) and platelets (P = .0001). After correction for the proportion of patients with > or = 2 x 10(6)/kg CD34 PBSCs infused and with < or = 12 months of prior therapy, no difference in engraftment kinetics was seen between patients receiving PBSCs only and those also receiving bone marrow. Exposure to chemotherapy, even to < or = 6 months of alkylating agents, significantly delayed hematopoietic recovery posttransplantation. The threshold dose of CD34 cells necessary for prompt engraftment was > or = 2.0 x 10(6)/kg for patients with < or = 24 months of chemotherapy before the first transplant, whereas greater than 5 x 10(6)/kg CD34 cells were required to assure rapid recovery also in those with longer exposure. Such quantities, easily collected in the large majority of patients with shorter exposure (91%), were obtained in only 28% of patients with more than 24 months of prior chemotherapy. Rapid platelet recovery within a narrow range of time (before day 14) was almost invariably seen (94%) when greater than 5 x 10(6)/kg CD34 cells were infused, irrespective of the duration of prior therapy, whereas the range widened progressively when less CD34 cells were infused. In the absence of CD34 measurements, fast recovery of platelets to greater than 50 x 10(9)/L within 14 days after high-dose cyclophosphamide and < or = 12 months of prior chemotherapy were the best predictors of early engraftment. Prudent use of stem cell-damaging agents, such as melphalan and nitrosoureas, is recommended in MM patients who might be candidates for autotransplantation. Alternatively, PBSCs should be collected early after diagnosis.     

High-dose cyclophosphamide, carmustine (BCNU), and etoposide (VP16-213) with or without cisplatin (CBV +/- P) and autologous transplantation for patients with Hodgkin's disease who fail to enter a complete remission after combination chemotherapy

Patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) who fail to enter a complete remission after an initial course of combination chemotherapy are usually considered to have an induction failure (IF); this subset of patients has an extremely poor outcome with further conventional therapy. Since 1985, we have entered 30 IF patients into protocols using conditioning with high-dose cyclophosphamide, carmustine (BCNU), and etoposide (VP16-213) with or without cisplatin (CBV +/- P) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with bone marrow (19 patients), peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs; 8 patients), or both (3 patients). All except 2 patients had previously received chemotherapy regimens for HD that contained at least 7 drugs, and 9 had received prior radiotherapy (RT). After documentation of IF, the majority of patients received some cytoreductive therapy as specified by protocol (local RT in 9, two cycles of conventional chemotherapy in 2, both modalities in 2, or high-dose cyclophosphamide to enhance PBSC collection in 11) before CBV +/- P. Five treatment-related deaths occurred, all before day 150 posttransplant. Eleven patients have had progressive HD at a median of 6 months (range, 0.1 to 45 months) after ASCT. The actuarial progression-free survival (PFS) at a median follow- up of 3.6 years (range, 0.2 to 8.2 years) is 42% (95% confidence intervals, 21% to 61%). The statistical analysis identified only prior clinical bleomycin lung toxicity as an adverse risk factor for PFS, mainly because of the increased nonrelapse mortality seen in these patients. CBV +/- P and ASCT can produce durable remission in a substantial proportion of IF HD patients who otherwise have a poor survival, and we believed ASCT approaches represent the best therapy currently available for these patients. Additional measures are needed to reduce the primary problem of disease progression despite high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation.