The apolipoprotein(a) size, pentanucleotide repeat, C/T(+93) polymorphisms of apolipoprotein(a) gene, serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations and their relationship in a Korean population.

BACKGROUND: In addition to apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] kringle 4 variable number of tandem repeat (K4-VNTR), pentanucleotide repeat polymorphism (PNRP) and C/T(+93) polymorphism [C/T(+93)] of apo(a) gene have been suggested to be related to lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentration. We studied the distribution of these genetic polymorphisms and their relationship with Lp(a) concentrations in a Korean population. METHODS: One hundred thirty-two Korean adults were examined. Lp(a) was measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Apo(a) K4-VNTR was measured by high-resolution SDS-agarose gel separation and ECL Western blotting method. PNRP was measured after DNA amplification. The C/T(+93) ratio was measured by a amplification refractory mutation system. RESULTS: Lp(a) was inversely correlated with K4-VNTR (r=0.732, p<0.0001), but was associated neither with any PNRP haplotype nor with C/T(+93) by multiple regression analysis, although we found a significant decrease of Lp(a) in PNRP 9/9 individuals (p<0.01). There was a strong linkage disequilibrium between 9 haplotypes of PNRP and the T haplotype of C/T(+93). CONCLUSIONS: Inverse relationship between serum Lp(a) and K4 number of apo(a) was confirmed in normal Korean adults. PNRP 9/9 genotype appeared to have a reducing effect on Lp(a), but neither 9 haplotype heterozygotes of PNRP nor the T haplotype C/T(+93) affected Lp(a) concentrations in Koreans.     

A pentanucleotide repeat polymorphism in the 5' control region of the apolipoprotein(a) gene is associated with lipoprotein(a) plasma concentrations in Caucasians.

The enormous interindividual variation in the plasma concentrations of the atherogenic lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is almost entirely controlled by the apo(a) locus on chromosome 6q26-q27. A variable number of transcribed kringle4 repeats (K4-VNTR) in the gene explains a large fraction of this variation, whereas the rest is presently unexplained. We here have analyzed the effect of the K4-VNTR and of a pentanucleotide repeat polymorphism (TTTTA)n (n = 6-11) in the 5' control region of the apo(a) gene on plasma Lp(a) levels in unrelated healthy Tyroleans (n = 130), Danes (n = 154), and Black South Africans (n = 112). The K4-VNTR had a significant effect on plasma Lp(a) levels in Caucasians and explained 41 and 45% of the variation in Lp(a) plasma concentration in Tyroleans and Danes, respectively. Both, the pentanucleotide repeat (PNR) allele frequencies and their effects on Lp(a) concentrations were heterogeneous among populations. A significant negative correlation between the number of pentanucleotide repeats and the plasma Lp(a) concentration was observed in Tyroleans and Danes. The effect of the 5' PNRP on plasma Lp(a) concentrations was independent from the K4-VNTR and explained from 10 to 14% of the variation in Lp(a) concentrations in Caucasians. No significant effect of the PNRP was present in Black Africans. This suggests allelic association between PNR alleles and sequences affecting Lp(a) levels in Caucasians. Thus, in Caucasians but not in Blacks, concentrations of the atherogenic Lp(a) particle are strongly associated with two repeat polymorphisms in the apo(a) gene.     

Apolipoprotein(a) gene polymorphisms (TTTTA)n and G/A-914 affect Lp(a) levels in ischemic heart disease patients from Serbia

OBJECTIVES: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) concentration is determined primarily by the apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) gene. The pentanucleotide (TTTTA)n repeat and G/A-914 polymorphisms are in the 5' promoter region of the apo(a) gene. To elucidate whether these polymorphisms affect Lp(a) levels, a total of 211 Serbian adults were investigated. DESIGN: One hundred and eleven patients with ischemic heart disease and 100 healthy controls were genotyped and Lp(a) levels determined. RESULTS: Lp(a) concentrations differed according to the (TTTTA)n genotypes: among those having at least one allele 8, patients had significantly higher Lp(a) values than controls. A decreasing trend of Lp(a) values was associated with the -914A allele in controls but the opposite was true in patients. Patients with genotype TTTTA allele 8/AA-914 had significantly higher Lp(a) values than those without allele 8/AA (p < 0.05). The >8>8/GG genotype was not detected. Significant linkage disequilibrium between (TTTTA)n and G/A-914 polymorphism (p < 0.001) was found. In multivariate regression analysis, the G/A-914 polymorphism significantly (p < 0.05) affected Lp(a) levels in patients, after taking into account the (TTTTA)n polymorphism. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that (TTTTA)n and G/A-914 polymorphisms affect Lp(a) levels in ischemic heart disease as a consequence of the linkage disequlibrium.     

Sequence polymorphisms in the apolipoprotein (a) gene. Evidence for dissociation between apolipoprotein(a) size and plasma lipoprotein(a) levels.

Apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], an apolipoprotein unique to lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], is highly polymorphic in size. Previous studies have indicated that the size of the apo(a) gene tends to be inversely correlated with the plasma level of Lp(a). However, several exceptions to this general trend have been identified. Individuals with apo(a) alleles of identical size do not always have similar plasma concentrations of Lp(a). To determine if these differences in plasma Lp(a) concentrations were due to sequence variations in the apo(a) gene, we examined the sequences of apo(a) alleles in 23 individuals homozygous for same-sized apo(a) alleles. We identified four single-strand DNA conformation polymorphisms (SSCPs) in the apo(a) gene. Of the 23 homozygotes, 21 (91%) were heterozygous for at least one of the SSCPs. Analysis of a family in which a parent was homozygous for the same-sized apo(a) allele revealed that each allele, though identical size, segregated with different plasma concentrations of Lp(a). These studies indicate that the apo(a) gene is even more polymorphic in sequence than was previously appreciated, and that sequence variations at the apo(a) locus, other than the number of kringle 4 repeats, contribute to the plasma concentration of Lp(a).     

Genetics and metabolism of lipoprotein(a) and their clinical implications (Part 1)

The human plasma lipoprotein Lp(a) has gained considerable clinical interest as a genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular diseases. Numerous (including prospective) studies have described a correlation between elevated Lp(a) plasma levels and coronary heart disease, stroke and peripheral atherosclerosis. Lp(a) consists of a large LDL-like particle to which the specific glycoprotein apo(a) is covalently linked. The apo(a) gene is located on chromosome 6 and belongs to a gene family including the highly homologous plasminogen. Lp(a) plasma concentrations are controlled to a large extent by the extremely polymorphic apo(a) gene. More than 30 alleles at this locus determine a size polymorphism. The size of the apo(a) isoform is inversely correlated with Lp(a) plasma concentrations, which are non-normally distributed in most populations. To a minor extent, apo(a) gene-independent effects also influence Lp(a) concentrations. These include diet, hormonal status and diseases like renal disease and familial hypercholesterolemia. The standardisation of Lp(a) quantification is still an unresolved problem due to the enormous particle heterogeneity of Lp(a) and homologies of other members of the gene family. Stability problems of Lp(a) as well as statistical pitfalls in studies with small group sizes have created conflicting results. The apo(a)/Lp(a) secretion from hepatocytes is regulated at various levels including postranslationally by apo(a) isoform-dependent prolonged retention in the endoplasmic reticulum. This mechanism can partly explain the inverse correlation between apo(a) size and plasma concentrations. According to numerous investigations, Lp(a) is assembled extracellularly from separately secreted apo(a) and LDL. The sites and mechanisms of Lp(a) removal from plasma are only poorly understood. The human kidney seems to represent a major catabolic organ for Lp(a) uptake. The underlying mechanism is rather unclear; several candidate receptors from the LDL-receptor gene family do not or poorly bind Lp(a) in vitro. Lp(a) plasma levels are elevated over controls in patients with renal diseases like nephrotic syndrome and end-stage renal disease. Following renal transplantation, Lp(a) concentrations decrease to values observed in controls matched for apo(a) type. Controversial data on Lp(a) in diabetes mellitus mainly result from insufficient sample sizes in numerous studies. Large studies and those including apo(a) phenotype analysis have come to the conclusion that Lp(a) levels are not or only moderately elevated in insulin-dependent patients. In non-insulin-dependent diabetics Lp(a) is not elevated. Several rare disorders, such as LCAT and LPL deficiency, as well as liver diseases and abetalipoproteinemia are associated with low plasma levels or lack of Lp(a).     

Apolipoprotein(a) gene accounts for greater than 90% of the variation in plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations.

Plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a low density lipoprotein particle with an attached apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], varies widely in concentration between individuals. These concentration differences are heritable and inversely related to the number of kringle 4 repeats in the apo(a) gene. To define the genetic determinants of plasma Lp(a) levels, plasma Lp(a) concentrations and apo(a) genotypes were examined in 48 nuclear Caucasian families. Apo(a) genotypes were determined using a newly developed pulsed-field gel electrophoresis method which distinguished 19 different genotypes at the apo(a) locus. The apo(a) gene itself was found to account for virtually all the genetic variability in plasma Lp(a) levels. This conclusion was reached by analyzing plasma Lp(a) levels in siblings who shared zero, one, or two apo(a) genes that were identical by descent (ibd). Siblings with both apo(a) alleles ibd (n = 72) have strikingly similar plasma Lp(a) levels (r = 0.95), whereas those who shared no apo(a) alleles (n = 52), had dissimilar concentrations (r = -0.23). The apo(a) gene was estimated to be responsible for 91% of the variance of plasma Lp(a) concentration. The number of kringle 4 repeats in the apo(a) gene accounted for 69% of the variation, and yet to be defined cis-acting sequences at the apo(a) locus accounted for the remaining 22% of the inter-individual variation in plasma Lp(a) levels. During the course of these studies we observed the de novo generation of a new apo(a) allele, an event that occurred once in 376 meioses.     

Adenovirus-mediated apo(a)-antisense-RNA expression efficiently inhibits apo(a) synthesis in vitro and in vivo

Apo(a) is a very atherogenic plasma protein without apparent function, which is highly expressed in humans. The variation in plasma Lp(a) concentration among individuals is considerable. Approximately 10-15% of the white population exhibit plasma Lp(a) concentrations above the atherogenic cut-off value of approximately 30 mg/dl. Since there is currently no safe way of treating those patients with drugs, we have tested the possibility of interfering with apo(a) biosynthesis by adenovirus-mediated expression of antisense apo(a) mRNA comprising the 5' UTR, the signal sequence and the first three kringles of native apo(a). Transduction of rat hepatoma McA RH 7777 cells which stably expressed apo(a) with 18 kringle IV (KIV) domains with apo(a)-antisense adenovirus (AS-Ad) at multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 30 reduced apo(a) synthesis to 23% as compared with control cells. As apo(a) is not synthesized in laboratory animals, we induced biosynthesis of the N-terminal fragments of apo(a) in mice by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer. Cotransduction of these mice with AS-Ad, which expressed up to eight times higher amounts of apo(a) than stable transgenic apo(a) mice, led to an almost complete disappearance of apo(a) from plasma. We conclude that the proposed AS-construct is very efficient in interfering with apo(a) biosynthesis in vivo. The strategy of inducing the synthesis of a nonexpressed protein followed by knocking it out by AS technology may also be applicable to other systems.     

LDL-apheresis significantly reduces urinary apo(a) excretion

Abstract. Increased plasma Lp(a) is an established risk factor for atherosclerosis. We recently described the presence of apo(a) fragments in urine and the significant correlation between urinary apo(a) concentrations and plasma Lp(a). Here we investigated urinary apo(a) in patients suffering from familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), treated with LDL apheresis. Before treatment, plasma Lp(a) levels and urinary apo(a) normalized to creatinine were >2-fold increased in FH patients (P <0.0001) as compared to controls. LDL-apheresis led to a reduction of plasma Lp(a) by 75% and a concommittant immediate reduction of urinary apo(a) by 45%. We conclude that a steady state condition for urinary apo(a) is rapidly achieved via LDL-apheresis.     

LDL-apheresis significantly reduces urinary apo(a) excretion

Abstract. Increased plasma Lp(a) is an established risk factor for atherosclerosis. We recently described the presence of apo(a) fragments in urine and the significant correlation between urinary apo(a) concentrations and plasma Lp(a). Here we investigated urinary apo(a) in patients suffering from familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), treated with LDL apheresis. Before treatment, plasma Lp(a) levels and urinary apo(a) normalized to creatinine were >2-fold increased in FH patients ( P  <0.0001) as compared to controls. LDL-apheresis led to a reduction of plasma Lp(a) by 75% and a concommittant immediate reduction of urinary apo(a) by 45%. We conclude that a steady state condition for urinary apo(a) is rapidly achieved via LDL-apheresis.     

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) in patients with end-stage renal disease are not related to the size polymorphism of apolipoprotein(a).

Patients with terminal renal insufficiency suffer from an increased incidence of atherosclerotic diseases. Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] have been established as a genetically controlled risk factor for these diseases. Variable alleles at the apo(a) gene locus determine to a large extent the Lp(a) concentration in the general population. In addition, other genetic and nongenetic factors also contribute to the plasma concentrations of Lp(a). We therefore investigated Apo(a) phenotypes and Lp(a) plasma concentrations in a large group of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and in a control group. Lp(a) concentrations were significantly elevated in ESRD patients (20.1 +/- 20.3 mg/dl) as compared with the controls (12.1 +/- 15.5 mg/dl, P < 0.001). However, no difference was found in apo(a) isoform frequency between the ESRD group and the controls. Interestingly, only patients with large size apo(a) isoforms exhibited two- to fourfold elevated levels of Lp(a), whereas the small-size isoforms had similar concentrations in ESRD patients and controls. Beside elevated Lp(a) concentrations, ESRD patients had lower levels of plasma cholesterol and apolipoprotein B. These results show that elevated Lp(a) plasma levels might significantly contribute to the risk for atherosclerotic diseases in ESRD. They further indicate that nongenetic factors related to renal insufficiency or other genes beside the apo(a) structural gene locus must be responsible for the high Lp(a) levels.     

Apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes, Lp(a) concentration and plasma lipid levels in relation to coronary heart disease in a Chinese population: evidence for the role of the apo(a) gene in coronary heart disease.

Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) concentrations are associated with premature coronary heart disease (CHD). In the general population, Lp(a) levels are largely determined by alleles at the hypervariable apolipoprotein(a) (apo[a]) gene locus, but other genetic and environmental factors also affect plasma Lp(a) levels. In addition, Lp(a) has been hypothesized to be an acute phase protein. It is therefore unclear whether the association of Lp(a) concentrations with CHD is primary in nature. We have analyzed apo(a) phenotypes, Lp(a) levels, total cholesterol, and HDL-cholesterol in patients with CHD, and in controls from the general population. Both samples were Chinese individuals residing in Singapore. Lp(a) concentrations were significantly higher in the patients than in the population (mean 20.7 +/- 23.9 mg/dl vs 8.9 +/- 12.9 mg/dl). Apo(a) isoforms associated with high Lp(a) levels (B, S1, S2) were significantly more frequent in the CHD patients than in the population sample (15.9% vs 8.5%, P less than 0.01). Higher Lp(a) concentrations in the patients were in part explained by this difference in apo(a) allele frequencies. Results from stepwise logistic regression analysis indicate that apo(a) type was a significant predictor of CHD, independent of total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol, but not independent of Lp(a) levels. The data demonstrate that alleles at the apo(a) locus determine the risk for CHD through their effects on Lp(a) levels, and firmly establish the role of Lp(a) as a primary genetic risk factor for CHD.     

The association of serum lipoprotein(a) levels, apolipoprotein(a) size and (TTTTA)(n) polymorphism with coronary heart disease.

BACKGROUND: The association between lipoprotein(a) levels, apolipoprotein(a) size and the (TTTTA)(n) polymorphism which is located in the 5' non-coding region of the apo(a) gene was studied in 263 patients with severe coronary heart disease and 97 healthy subjects. METHODS: Lp(a) levels were measured by ELISA, apo(a) isoform size was determined by SDS-agarose gel electrophoresis, and analysis of the (TTTTA)(n) was carried out by PCR. For statistical calculation, both groups were divided into low (at least one apo(a) isoform with < or = 22 Kringle IV) and high (both isoforms with >22 KIV) apo(a) isoform sizes, and into low number (<10 in both alleles) and high number of (> or =10 at least one allele) TTTTA repeats. RESULTS: Lp(a) levels were higher (P=0.007), apo(a) isoforms size < or =22 KIV and TTTTA repeats > or = 10 were more frequent (P=0.007 and 0.01) in cases than in controls. Lp(a) levels were found to be increased with low apo(a) weight in both groups (both P<0.0001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only the Lp(a) levels (P=0.005) and (TTTTA)(n) polymorphism (P=0.002) were found to be significantly associated with CHD. CONCLUSION: Nevertheless, these results indicate that in CHD patients the (TTTTA)(n) polymorphism has an effect on Lp(a) levels which is independent of the apo(a) size.     

Plasma Ip(a) concentration is inversely correlated with the ratio of Kringle IV/Kringle V encoding domains in the apo(a) gene.

Plasma Lp(a) levels correlate with atherosclerosis susceptibility. This lipoprotein consists of an LDL-like particle attached to a large glycoprotein called apo(a). Apo(a) is a complex glycoprotein containing multiple Kringle domains, found to be highly homologous to plasminogen Kringle IV, and a single Kringle domain homologous to plasminogen Kringle V. Lp(a) levels appear to be inversely correlated with apo(a) size in a given individual. In this study, we have used probes specific to the Kringles IV and V domains of apo(a) cDNA in quantitative Southern blotting analysis. By this method, we have determined the ratio of Kringle IV/Kringle V encoding domains in the apo(a) gene of 53 unrelated individuals with different plasma concentrations of Lp(a). This ratio was found to be inversely correlated with log Lp(a) levels (r = -0.90, P less than 0.0001) and directly correlated with apo(a) apparent molecular weight (Mr) (r = 0.79, P less than 0.0001). In summary, by showing that Lp(a) concentrations and apo(a) apparent size are highly correlated with the ratio of Kringle IV/Kringle V encoding domains in the apo(a) gene, we provide a DNA marker for this atherosclerosis risk factor as well as an important insight into the genetic mechanism regulating Lp(a) levels.     

LIPOPROTEIN(α) IN HEALTH AND DISEASE

SUMMARY Elevated plasma levels of Lp(a) do seem to influence the progression of atherosclerosis. Evidence is emerging that certain apo(a) isoforms may be more atherogenic than others, and in transgenic mice free apo(a) has been shown to be associated with accelerated atherosclerosis. Currently it is not known whether treating elevated Lp(a) levels will reduce progression of atherosclerosis and, as therapeutic options are limited, mass screening of Lp(a) levels in populations is not indicated. The presence of raised Lp(a) levels, however, warrants aggressive treatment to reduce other cardiovascular risk factors. Continuing research to investigate the relationship of the apo(a) gene to other genes, including the plasminogen gene and apo(a)-related genes, will add further information pertaining to the evolution, function, regulation and clinical implications of Lp(a).     

Changes of genetic apolipoprotein phenotypes caused by liver transplantation. Implications for apolipoprotein synthesis.

Liver transplantation provides a unique opportunity to investigate the contribution in vivo of the liver to the synthesis and degradation of genetically polymorphic plasma proteins. We have determined the genetic polymorphisms plasma proteins. We have determined the genetic polymorphisms of apo A-IV, apo E, and of the Lp(a) glycoprotein (apo (a] in the plasma of subjects undergoing liver transplantation and in respective organ donors. The results show that in humans, greater than 90% of the plasma apo E and virtually all apo (a) are liver derived, whereas this organ does not significantly contribute to plasma apo A-IV levels.     

Urinary apo(a) excretion is not altered by changes in glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow in healthy males

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic disease. However, information concerning the site of Lp(a) catabolism and breakdown is scarce. Several studies have shown that, in renal insufficiency, plasma Lp(a) levels are elevated, and that after normalisation of kidney function they return to normal. We have recently shown that fragments of apo(a) are found in the urine of healthy individuals. Despite this evidence that apo (a) is excreted into the urine, the mode of excretion of apo(a) remains unclear. Since it has been reported that intravenous infusion of somatostatin can reduce glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF), we analysed urinary apo(a) excretion in ten healthy volunteers receiving somatostatin infusions. The infusion of somatostatin led to reversible changes in GFR and RPF. Apo(a) excretion was constant in all 10 individuals over the entire time course when normalised for creatinine. There was a highly significant correlation between plasma Lp(a) levels and urinary apo(a) values. Changes in renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate did not alter urinary apo(a) excretion. We conclude that a constant amount of apo(a) is excreted into urine, depending on plasma Lp(a) levels, and that urinary apo(a) excretion is not altered by changes in GFR and RPF in healthy males.     

Lipoprotein(a) as a risk factor for atherosclerosis and thrombosis: mechanistic insights from animal models

Evidence continues to accumulate from epidemiological studies that elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are a risk factor for a variety of atherosclerotic and thrombotic disorders. Lp(a) is a unique lipoprotein particle consisting of a moiety identical to low-density lipoprotein to which the glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] that is homologous to plasminogen is covalently attached. These features have suggested that Lp(a) may contribute to both proatherogenic and prothrombotic/antifibrinolytic processes and in vitro studies have identified many such candidate mechanisms. Despite intensive research, however, definition of the molecular mechanisms underlying the epidemiological data has proven elusive. Moreover, an effective and well-tolerated regimen to lower Lp(a) levels has yet to be developed. The use of animal models holds great promise for resolving these questions. Establishment of animal models for Lp(a) has been hampered by the absence of this lipoprotein from common small laboratory animals. Transgenic mice and rabbits expressing human apo(a) have been developed and these have been used to: (i) examine regulation of apo(a) gene expression; (ii) study the mechanism and molecular determinants of Lp(a) assembly from LDL and apo(a); (iii) demonstrate that apo(a)/Lp(a) are indeed proatherogenic and antifibrinolytic; and (iv) identify structural domains in apo(a) that mediate its pathogenic effects. The recent construction of transgenic apo(a) rabbits is a particularly promising development in view of the excellent utility of the rabbit as a model of advanced atherosclerosis.     

Further characterization of the plasma lipoprotein(a) distribution

The plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] distribution in caucasians is heavily skewed to the right, with evidence of bimodality. As there is a well-described inverse relationship between apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] size and Lp(a) concentration, it is likely that the presence of multiple apo(a) isoforms of differing frequency has a significant impact on the final distribution of Lp(a) concentrations. We have previously described an immunoblot method for examining the relationship between apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] size and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] mass among samples heterozygous for apo(a) size, thus eliminating confounding by null or undetected apo(a) isoforms. In the present study, this method has been applied to examine the plasma Lp(a) distribution, independent of the effects of apo(a) isoform size and frequency. Seventy subjects heterozygous for apo(a) size were studied. To take into account the inverse relationship (P <0.001) between apo(a) isoform size and Lp(a) concentration, Lp(a) data associated with each apo(a) isoform were normalized as multiples of the median Lp(a) concentration for that isoform. These apo(a) isoform-independent Lp(a) data demonstrated a strikingly multimodal distribution, with five major peaks. The relative frequencies of Lp(a) peaks 1–5 were 17.1%, 15.0%, 35.7%, 23.6%, and 8.6%, and associated median Lp(a) concentrations were 1.0, 6.2,15.0, 21.8, and 39.6 mg/dL, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that apo(a) isoform size accounted for 23% and isoform-independent Lp(a) peaks for 59.5% of the variation in Lp(a) concentration. Further investigation of the characteristics of the apo(a) isoform-independent Lp(a) distribution is warranted.     

Kringle-containing fragments of apolipoprotein(a) circulate in human plasma and are excreted into the urine.

Apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] contains multiple kringle 4 repeats and circulates as part of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. Apo(a) is synthesized by the liver but its clearance mechanism is unknown. Previously, we showed that kringle 4-containing fragments of apo(a) are present in human urine. To probe their origin, human plasma was examined and a series of apo(a) immunoreactive peptides larger in size than urinary fragments was identified. The concentration of apo(a) fragments in plasma was directly related to the plasma level of Lp(a) and the 24-h urinary excretion of apo(a). Individuals with low (< 2 mg/dl) plasma levels of Lp(a) had proportionally more apo(a) circulating as fragments in their plasma. Similar apo(a) fragments were identified in baboon plasma but not in conditioned media from primary cultures of baboon hepatocytes, suggesting that the apo(a) fragments are generated from circulating apo(a) or Lp(a). When apo(a) fragments purified from human plasma were injected intravenously into mice, a species that does not produce apo(a), apo(a) fragments similar to those found in human urine were readily detected in mouse urine. Thus, we propose that apo(a) fragments in human plasma are derived from circulating apo(a)/Lp(a) and are the source of urinary apo(a).