集落刺激因子的生物功能

正常人体中,只有骨髓中存在多能干细胞,它能产生血液循环中所有的成熟红细胞,中性粒细胞,嗜酸性粒细胞,嗜碱性粒细胞,单核细胞,淋巴细胞及血小板。这些成熟细胞的寿命较短,它们持续不断的更替有赖于多能干细胞的大量增殖。血细胞的产生受到复杂而严密的调控,保证健康状态的血细胞水平维持稳定,并在受到外伤或感染时能迅速变化。每个成年人每日大约更新１２００亿个粒细胞,若感染时,其产生数量最少增加十倍。 １９６６年, Ｂｒａｄｌｙ, Ｍｅｔａｃａｆｆ和Ｉｃｈｉｋａｗａ等建立了一种细胞培养系统,允许粒细胞和单核细胞的…     

Improved granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilization of hemopoietic progenitors using cytokine combinations in primates

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs), usually mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or in combination with chemotherapy, are the preferred source of cells for hemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Up to 25% of otherwise eligible transplant recipients fail to harvest adequate PBSCs. Therefore it is important to investigate existing and novel reagents to improve PBSC mobilization. Because of marked interindividual variation in humans, we developed a robust nonhuman primate model that allows the direct comparison of the efficacy of two PBSC mobilization regimens within the same animal. Using this model, we compared pegylated G-CSF (pegG-CSF) with standard G-CSF and compared the combination of G-CSF and pegylated megakaryocyte growth and development factor (pegMGDF) with G-CSF plus stem cell factor (SCF) by measuring the levels of CD34(+) cells, colony-forming cells (CFCs), and SCID repopulating cells (SRCs) before and after cytokine administration. Mobilization of CD34(+) cells, CFCs and SRCs using pegG-CSF achieved similar levels to those resulting from 5 days of standard G-CSF. The combination of G-CSF+pegMGDF mobilized progenitors to levels similar to G-CSF+SCF but greater than standard G-CSF for CD34(+) cells and CFC. This first direct comparison of PBSC mobilization in individual primates demonstrates that peg-G-CSF is equivalent to daily G-CSF and that the addition of pegMGDF to G-CSF improves mobilization. In light of the development of new thrombopoietin agonists, these data offer the potential for improved stem cell mobilization strategies. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.     

Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma offers higher response rates and improved survival compared with conventional chemotherapy. However, successful autografting requires effective cytoreduction and rapid hematologic reconstitution. We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of 2 cycles of priming chemotherapy with either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization followed by autologous transplantation. The major study end points were the comparative utility of G-CSF versus GM-CSF, the percentage of patients achieving complete response after transplantation, and overall and progression-free survival. Priming chemotherapy included cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), mitoxantrone (8 g/m2 every day for 2 days), and dexamethasone (20 mg/m2 every 12 hours for 2 days) followed by randomization to either G-CSF or GM-CSF daily until completion of leukapheresis. Conditioning for transplantation included cyclophosphamide (75 mg/kg every day for 2 days) plus total body irradiation (165 cGy twice daily for 3 days), and patients received maintenance immunotherapy with interferon alpha. Seventy-two patients were randomized, and 64 underwent autologous transplantation. The median age at transplantation was 52 years, and the median time from diagnosis to transplantation was 10 months; 58% of the patients had received >4 cycles of pretransplantation chemotherapy. The median number of CD34+ cells obtained after mobilization was 16.4 x 10(6)/kg in the G-CSF arm versus 12.8 x 10(6)/kg in the GM-CSF arm (P = .8). Neutrophil recovery was faster in the G-CSF group after both cycle 1 (median, 13 days with G-CSF and 16 days with GM-CSF; P < .01) and cycle 2 (median, 13 days versus 17 days in the 2 groups, respectively; P = .03). Although platelet recovery was similar after cycle 1, platelet recovery to >100000/microL was notably faster in the G-CSF group both after cycle 2 and after transplantation (P = .03). Response and overall and disease-free survival were similar in both cohorts. Overall, 23% of the patients achieved a complete response after priming chemotherapy, which improved to 33% after transplantation. An additional 47% attained a partial response after transplantation, for a total response rate of 80%. With a median follow-up of 2 years (range, 0.7-8 years), the overall survival was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80%-96%) at 1 year and 65% (95% CI, 51%-79%) at 3 years. Progression-free survival was 73% (95% CI, 62%-84%) at 1 year and 40% (95% CI, 26%-54%) at 3 years. Relapse or progressive disease was the most common cause of death (25 [83%] of 30 deaths). We conclude that mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF versus GM-CSF results in similar CD34+ progenitor collections, even in patients exposed to multiple cycles of alkylator-based chemotherapy. Earlier neutrophil and platelet recovery was seen with G-CSF priming. Two cycles of priming chemotherapy plus autologous transplantation yields survival rates similar to those in published reports, including those using tandem transplantation.     

Immunologic profiles of effector cells and peripheral blood stem cells mobilized with different hematopoietic growth factors

BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have become the preferred source of stem cells for autologous transplantation because of the technical advantage and the shorter time to engraftment. Mobilization of CD34(+) cells into the peripheral blood can be achieved by the administration of G-CSF or GM-CSF, or both, alone or in combination with chemotherapy. G-CSF and GM-CSF differ somewhat in the number and composition of CD34(+) cells and effector cells mobilized to the peripheral blood. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the release and engraftment of CD34(+) cells is poorly understood. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to give a recent update on the type and immunological properties of effector cells and CD34(+) cells mobilized by the different growth factors with emphasis on A) mobilization of T cells, natural killer cells, and dendritic cells; B) coexpression of adhesion molecules such as VLA-4 and L-selectin in mobilized PBSC collection, and C) coexpression of CXCR4-the receptor for the stromal-derived differentiation factor 1-with latest information shedding light on the molecular mechanism underlying the release and subsequent engraftment of CD34(+) cells. CONCLUSIONS: A) The reported suppression of T cell and NK cell functions in PBSC apheresis collections in patients primed with G-CSF or GM-CSF is controversial and may merely reflect low effector cell activity before mobilization. B) A decrease in the expression of adhesion molecules such as VLA-4 and L-selectin is a necessary requirement for the release of CD34(+) cells to the peripheral blood. C) A decrease in the expression of CXCR4 is a necessary requirement for the release of CD34(+) cells to the peripheral blood and correlates with mobilization success.     

Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor-Based Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been reported to exacerbate vaso-occlusive crises in sickle cell disease. It has been recommended to avoid its use for stem cell mobilization in this population, yet autologous transplant is the standard of care and at times a life-saving treatment for patients with various hematologic malignancies such as relapsed aggressive lymphoma or multiple myeloma. We report 5 cases of patients with sickle cell disease and related hemoglobinopathies who underwent granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Three of them developed manageable vaso-occlusive pain symptoms requiring parenteral narcotics alone. The 2 others had no complications. These cases demonstrate that stem cell mobilization using G-CSF, although complicated and not without risk, is feasible in patients with sickle cell syndromes.     

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilizes more dendritic cell subsets than granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor with no polarization of dendritic cell subsets in normal donors

Dendritic cells (DCs) are effective antigen-presenting cells. We hypothesized that increasing the DC populations in donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) may augment the graft versus malignancy effect, particularly if granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) mobilization resulted in increased precursor dendritic cell (pDC) 1 cells. Mature DCs, pDC1 cells, pDC2 cells, and CD34(+) cells from the same donor were compared after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized peripheral blood stem cell collections and GM-CSF mobilized DLI collections. Mobilization with G-CSF resulted in up to a 10-fold larger number of CD34(+) cells per kg and a 3-5-fold larger number of mature DCs, pDC1 cells, and pDC2 cells within the same donor compared with GM-CSF. The ratio of pDC1 to pDC2 in each donor remained constant with either cytokine. In this small sample of normal donors, it appears that G-CSF mobilizes more CD34(+) cells, mature DCs, pDC1 cells, and pDC2 cells within the same donor than does GM-CSF, with no significant polarization by G-CSF or GM-CSF for either pDC1 or pDC2 cells.     

A randomized trial comparing the combination of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of dendritic cell subsets in hematopoietic progenitor cell products.

The ability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) administration to increase the content of blood leucocytes and hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) is well established, yet the effect of these cytokines on immune function is less well described. Recent data indicate that plasmacytoid dendritic cells (DC2) may inhibit cellular immune response. We hypothesized that administration of the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF after chemotherapy would reduce the type 2, or plasmacytoid, DC2 content of the autologous blood HPC grafts compared with treatment with G-CSF alone. To test this hypothesis, 35 patients with lymphoma and myeloma were randomized to receive either G-CSF or the combination of G-CSF plus GM-CSF after chemotherapy, and blood HPC grafts were collected by apheresis. Cytokine-related adverse events between the 2 groups were similar. More than 2 x 10(6)CD34 + cells per kilogram were collected by apheresis in 14 of 18 subjects treated with G-CSF and in 16 of 17 subjects treated with GM-CSF plus G-CSF ( p = not significant). There were minor differences between the 2 groups with respect to the content of T cells and CD34 + cells in the apheresis products. However, grafts collected from recipients of the combination of GM-CSF plus G-CSF had significantly fewer DC2 cells and similar numbers of DC1 cells compared with recipients treated with G-CSF alone. A third cohort of patients received chemotherapy followed by the sequential administration of G-CSF and the addition of GM-CSF 6 days later. Grafts from these patients had a markedly reduced DC2 content compared with those from patients treated either with G-CSF alone or with the concomitant administration of both cytokines. These data, and recent data that cross-presentation of antigen by DC2 cells may induce antigen-specific tolerance among T cells, suggest that GM-CSF during mobilization of blood HPC grafts may be a clinically applicable strategy to enhance innate and acquired immunity after autologous and allogeneic HPC transplantation.     

Femoral catheters: safety and efficacy in peripheral blood stem cell collection

Central venous access is necessary in patients candidate for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection. We report our experience with a dual lumen femoral catheter (Gamcath, 11 french), initially designed for hemodialysis. We studied 147 patients and performed 488 collections after mobilization with either G-CSF alone or chemotherapy + G-CSF, when the white blood cell count exceeded 1 x 10(9)/L, or when a measurable population of CD34+ cells (20/microL) was detected in peripheral blood. All patients received systemic anticoagulation with a low weight heparin and ultrasound examination was performed after the removal of the catheter. Seven patients developed thrombosis (4.7%), ten experienced hematomas at the site of catheter placement (6.8%) despite prophylactic platelet transfusions, while only one patient (0.6%) had a catheter-related infection. In conclusion, the short-term use of large bore femoral catheters in setting up PBSC collection seems to be associated with minimal risk of infection and low thrombotic incidence.     

Synergistic induction of interleukin-6 by tumor necrosis factor and lithium chloride in mice: possible role in the triggering and exacerbation of psoriasis by lithium treatment.

One of the side effects of treatment of manic depressive disease with lithium salts is the triggering or aggravation of psoriasis. In a murine model, subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of a combination of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and lithium chloride (LiCl) induces a psoriasiform inflammatory reaction. Recent studies suggest that interleukin (IL)-6 and its inducer TNF may play an important role in the pathophysiology of psoriasis. To understand the mechanism involved in the exacerbation of psoriasis by lithium salts, the IL-1, IL-6 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) levels in murine skin injected with TNF in combination with LiCl were studied. IL-6 levels in skin extracts of mice treated s.c. with a combination of TNF and LiCl were considerably increased as compared to the levels found in skin extracts from mice treated with TNF or LiCl alone. In contrast, in the same skin extracts IL-1 levels were not changed and GM-CSF was even not detectable. Although less pronounced, increased IL-6 levels could also be found in the sera of mice treated s.c. with TNF and LiCl. Injection with IL-1, interferon-gamma, lipopolysaccharide, or phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate also induced IL-6 in murine skin. However, these IL-6 levels were not enhanced by co-treatment with LiCl. Likewise, on inflammatory reaction could be seen in mice treated with these agents. These results suggest a role for endogenous TNF and IL-6 in the triggering or aggravation of psoriasis in lithium-treated patients.     

Enhanced unique pattern of hematopoietic cell mobilization induced by the CXCR4 antagonist 4F-benzoyl-TN14003

An increase in the number of stem cells in blood following mobilization is required to enhance engraftment after high-dose chemotherapy and improve transplantation outcome. Therefore, an approach that improves stem cell mobilization is essential. The interaction between CXCL12 and its receptor, CXCR4, is involved in the retention of stem cells in the bone marrow. Therefore, blocking CXCR4 may result in mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor and stem cells. We have found that the CXCR4 antagonist known as 4F-benzoyl-TN14003 (T-140) can induce mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors within a few hours post-treatment in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, although T-140 can also increase the number of white blood cells (WBC) in blood, including monocytes, B cells, and T cells, it had no effect on mobilizing natural killer cells. T-140 was found to efficiently synergize with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in its ability to mobilize WBC and progenitors, as well as to induce a 660-fold increase in the number of erythroblasts in peripheral blood. Comparison between the CXCR4 antagonists T-140 and AMD3100 showed that T-140 with or without G-CSF was significantly more potent in its ability to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors into blood. These results demonstrate that different CXCR4 antagonists may have different therapeutic potentials.     

Mobilization of Hematopoietic Progenitors from Normal Donors Using the Combination of Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Results in Fewer Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in the Graft and Enhanced Donor T Cell Engraftment with Th1 Polarization: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) both mobilize CD34⁺ stem cells into the blood when administered before apheresis but have distinct effects on dendritic cell (DC) differentiation. We previously demonstrated that the combination of GM+G-CSF results in fewer plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) when used to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation. To test the hypothesis that the content of pDCs in an allograft can be modulated with the cytokines used for mobilization, we randomized the human leukocyte antigen–matched sibling donors of 50 patients with hematological malignancies to a mobilization regimen of either GM+G-CSF (n = 25) or G-CSF alone (n = 25). Primary and secondary endpoints included the cellular constituents of the mobilized grafts, the kinetics of posttransplantation immune reconstitution, and clinical outcomes of the transplantation recipients. Grafts from donors receiving GM+G-CSF contained equivalent numbers of CD34⁺ cells with fewer pDCs and T cells, with a higher fraction of Th1-polarized donor T cells than G-CSF mobilized grafts. Immune recovery was enhanced among recipients of GM+G-CSF. Survival was not significantly different between transplantation recipients in the two arms. The use of GM+G-CSF modulates immune function and recovery after allogeneic transplantation and should be explored in larger studies powered to evaluate clinical outcomes.     

Treatment with granulocyte colony stimulating factor is associated with improvement in endothelial function

Primary objective: Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is used for the mobilization of bone marrow and endothelial progenitor cells, though G-CSF-induced inflammation may cause endothelial dysfunction. We examined the effects of G-CSF on endothelium, C-reactive protein (CRP), tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory cytokines namely interleukin 10 (IL-10).

Research design: We studied 60 women with breast cancer, who were randomized to either subcutaneous G-CSF (5 μg/kg), o.d. for 5 days after adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 40) or placebo (n = 20).

Experimental interventions: We measured flow-mediated dilatation (FMD%) of the brachial artery by ultrasonography, CRP, TNF-α, IL-10 and the ratio TNF-α/ IL-10 blood levels before, 2-h and 5-days after the G-CSF or placebo treatment.

Main outcomes and results: There was a greater increase of FMD, IL-10 and reduction of TNF-α/ IL-10, 2 h and 5 days after the G-CSF treatment compared to placebo. Although, CRP and TNF-α were higher, TNF-α/IL-10 was lower at the end of G-CSF treatment compared to placebo. Improvement of FMD was related to changes of IL-10 and TNF-α/IL-10.

Conclusions: Treatment with G-CSF improves endothelial function in vivo, possibly by shifting the balance between the pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines.     

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Risk-Adapted Algorithm of Plerixafor Use for Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization

Historically, up to 30% of patients were unable to collect adequate numbers of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Plerixafor in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has shown superior results in mobilizing peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells in comparison to G-CSF alone, but its high cost limits general use. We developed and evaluated risk-adapted algorithms for optimal utilization of plerixafor. In plerixafor-1, PBSC mobilization was commenced with G-CSF alone, and if PB CD34 on day 4 or day 5 was <10/μL, plerixafor was administered in the evening, and apheresis commenced the next day. In addition, if on any day, the daily yield was <0.5 × 10⁶ CD34/kg, plerixafor was added. Subsequently, the algorithm was revised (plerixafor-2) with lower thresholds. If day-4 PB CD34 <10/μL for single or <20/μL for multiple transplantations, or day-1 yield was <1.5 × 10⁶ CD34/kg, or any subsequent daily yield was <0.5 × 10⁶ CD34/kg, plerixafor was added. Three time periods were analyzed for results and associated costs: January to December 2008 (baseline cohort; 319 mobilization attempts in 278 patients); February to November 2009 (plerixafor-1; 221 mobilization attempts in 216 patients); and December 2009 to June 2010 (plerixafor-2; 100 mobilization attempts in 98 patients). Plerixafor-2 shows a significant improvement in PB CD34 collection, increased number of patients reaching minimum and optimal goals, fewer days of apheresis, and fewer days of mobilization/collection, albeit at increased costs. In conclusion, although the earlier identification of ineffective PBSC mobilization and initiation of plerixafor (plerixafor-2) increases the per-patient costs of PBSC mobilization, failure rates, days of apheresis, and total days of mobilization/collection are lower.     

Plasma levels of SDF-1 and expression of SDF-1 receptor on CD34+ cells in mobilized peripheral blood of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients

CXCR4 is the receptor for the chemokine stromal derived factor-1 (SDF-1), is expressed on CD34+ cells, and has been implicated in the process of CD34+ cell migration and homing. We studied the mobilization of CD34/CXCR4 cells and the plasma levels of SDF-1 and flt3-ligand (flt3-L) in 36 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving cyclophosphamide (Cy) plus G-CSF (arm A), Cy plus GM-CSF (arm B), or Cy plus GM-CSF followed by G-CSF (arm C) for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization and autotransplantation. We observed lower plasma levels of SDF-1 in PBSCs compared to premobilization bone marrow samples. The mean plasma SDF-1 levels were similar in PBSC collections in the three arms of the study. In contrast, SDF-1 levels in the apheresis collections of the "good mobilizers" (patients who collected a minimum of 2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in one to four PBSC collections) were significantly lower than the apheresis collections of the "poor mobilizers" (> or = 0.4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in the first two PBSC collections; 288 +/- 82 pg/ml versus 583 +/- 217 pg/ml; p = 0.0009). The mean percentage of CD34+ cells expressing CXCR4 in the apheresis collections was decreased in the PBSC collections compared with premobilization values from 28% to 19.4%. Furthermore, the percentage of CD34+ cells expressing CXCR4 in the good mobilizers was significantly lower compared with the poor mobilizers (14.7 +/- 2.1% versus 33.6 +/- 2.1%; p = 0.002). The good mobilizers had also significantly lower levels of flt3-L compared with the poor mobilizers (34 +/- 4 pg/ml versus 106 +/- 11 pg/ml; p = 0.006), Finally, the levels of flt3-L strongly correlated with SDF-1 levels (r = 0.8; p < 0.0001). We conclude: A) low plasma levels of SDF-1 and low expression of CXCR4 characterize patients with good mobilization outcome, and B) the levels of SDF-1 correlate with flt3-L, suggesting an association of these cytokines in mobilization of CD34+ cells.     

Fatal hematophagic histiocytosis after granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and chemotherapy for high-grade malignant lymphoma

Fatal hematophagic histiocytosis occurred in two patients after they had received granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in addition to chemotherapy for malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In one patient GM-CSF promoted the activity of subclinical hematophagic histiocytosis, resulting in severe pancytopenia and multiorgan failure. In the other patient the syndrome that caused persistent bone marrow failure began after the institution of GM-CSF therapy. Exogenous GM-CSF appears to upregulate preexisting hematophagic histiocytosis and may even contribute to its de novo initiation. It is therefore conceivable that endogenous GM-CSF also plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of this syndrome.Abbreviations CMV cytomegalovirus - G-CSF granulocyte colony-stimulating factor - GM-CSF granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor Correspondence to: A. Schaffner     

G-CSF、GM-CSF的临床应用现状

粒细胞集落刺激因子（Ｇｒａｎｕｌｏｃｙｔｅ ｃｏｌｏｎｙ－ｓｔｉｍｕｌａｔｉｎｇ ｆａｃｔｏｒ, Ｇ－ＣＳＦ）、粒巨噬细胞集落刺激因子（ Ｇｒａｎｕｌｏｃｙｔｅ ｍａｃｒｏｐｈａｇｅ ｃｏｌｏｎｙ－ｓｔｉｍｕｌａｔｉｎｇ ｆａｃｔｏｒ,ＧＭ－ＣＳＦ）分别是促粒系、粒－单系造血祖细胞增殖、分化及成熟,并增强其成熟细胞功能的特异造血调控生长因子。重组ＤＮＡ技术的发展,使得利用基因工程方法大量生产细胞因子成为可能。目前,Ｇ－ＣＳＦ、ＧＭ－ＣＳＦ基因重组产品已广泛应用于临床。在血液病的治疗,造血干细胞移植及恶…     

Orchestration of Chemomobilization and G-CSF Administration for Successful Hematopoietic Stem Cell Collection

Successful collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) depends on the optimal orchestration of mobilization chemotherapy, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) application, and CD34⁺ cell number assessment in the peripheral blood (PB). However, determining the optimal timing in accordance to the applied chemomobilization regimen can be challenging. Although most centers apply their own local timing schedules, a reliable timetable including the currently most often used mobilization regimens is lacking. We present a comprehensive analysis of the timing modalities for 11 of the most commonly used chemomobilization regimens. A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical and PBSC collection parameters (including duration of G-CSF application, time point of CD34⁺ assessment, PB CD34⁺ cell count, number of leukapheresis [LP] sessions, processed blood volume, and CD34⁺ collection results) of 91 representatively selected patients who had undergone stem cell mobilization at 2 collection centers.Six to 10 patients were analyzed per regimen with a variety of diagnoses, including multiple myeloma, malignant lymphoma, and sarcoma. No collection failures (<2?×?10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg body weight) were observed. All analyzed patients successfully reached their individual collection goal in adherence to the given schedule of chemotherapy, application of G-CSF, measurement of CD34⁺ cells, and subsequent LP.The presented data on the timing of chemomobilization, G-CSF application, and stem cell collection may be helpful in clinical decision making and contribute to a more transparent and predictable treatment process.     

Matched-pair analysis of hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization using G-CSF vs. cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and G-CSF: enhanced CD34+ cell collections are not necessarily cost-effective.

Using matched-pair analysis, we compared two popular methods of stem cell mobilization in 24 advanced-stage breast cancer patients who underwent two consecutive mobilizing procedures as part of a tandem transplant protocol. For the first cycle, 10 microg/kg/day granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was given and apheresis commenced on day 4 and continued for < or =5 days (median 3 days). One week after the first cycle of apheresis, 4000 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 400 mg/m2 etoposide, and 10 microg/kg G-CSF were administered for < or =16 days (cycle 2). Apheresis was initiated when the white blood cell (WBC) count exceeded 5000 cells/microL and continued for < or =5 days (median 3 days). Mean values of peripheral blood WBC (31,700+/-3200 vs. 30,700+/-3300/microL) were not significantly different between cycles 1 and 2. Mean number of mononuclear cells (MNC) collected per day was slightly greater with G-CSF mobilization than with the combination of chemotherapy and G-CSF (2.5+/-0.21x10(8) vs. 1.8+/-0.19x10(8) cells/kg). Mean daily CD34+ cell yield, however, was nearly six times higher (12.9+/-4.4 vs. 2.2+/-0.5x10(6)/kg; p = 0.01) with chemotherapy plus G-CSF. With G-CSF alone, 13% of aphereses reached the target dose of 5x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in one collection vs. 57% with chemotherapy plus G-CSF. Transfusions of red blood cells or platelets were necessary in 18 of 24 patients in cycle 2. Three patients were hospitalized with fever for a median of 3 days after cycle 2. No patients received transfusions or required hospitalization during mobilization with G-CSF alone. Resource utilization (cost of drugs, aphereses, cryopreservation, transfusions, hospitalization) was calculated comparing the median number of collections to obtain a target CD34+ cell dose of 5x10(6) cells/kg: four using G-CSF vs. one using the combination in this data set. Resources for G-CSF mobilization cost $7326 vs. $8693 for the combination, even though more apheresis procedures were performed using G-CSF mobilization. The cost of chemotherapy administration, more doses of G-CSF, transfusions, and hospitalizations caused cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and G-CSF to be more expensive than G-CSF alone. A less toxic and less expensive treatment than cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and G-CSF is needed to be more cost-effective than G-CSF alone for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization.     

Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilization on the expression patterns, clonality and signal transduction of TRAV and TRBV repertoire

The immune modulatory effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on T cells resulted in an unexpected low incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (allo-PBSCT). Recently, αβ(+) T cells are identified as the primary effector cells for GVHD. However, whether G-CSF could influence the repertoire of αβ(+) T cells (TRAV and TRBV repertoire) and CD3 genes remains unclear. To further characterize this feature, we investigated the effect of G-CSF mobilization on the T cell receptors (TCR) of αβ(+) T cells (TRAV and TRBV repertoire) and CD3 genes, as well as the association between the changes of TCR repertoire and GVHD in patients undergoing G-CSF mobilized allo-PBSCT. We found that G-CSF mobilization had an effect on the expression patterns, clonality and signal transduction of TRAV and TRBV repertoire. This alteration might play a role in mediating GVHD in G-CSF mobilized allo-PBSCT.     

Ultrastructural effects of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) on rat neutrophils and monocytes

Human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) were administered intravenously to rats, and their effects on neutrophils and monocytes were examined by electron microscopy. G-CSF increased the number of cytoplasmic granules in neutrophils. It also enhanced maturation of the nuclear shape in the neutrophils, while chromatin condensation and peroxidase distribution remained immature. M-CSF induced proliferation of monocytes in peripheral blood and bone marrow, but did not affect morphology or distribution of peroxidase reactivity. This study was presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of the Clinical Electron Microscopy Society of Japan, Matsumoto, September 28–30, 1993.