一种自粘接树脂水门汀与氧化锆陶瓷粘接的耐久性评价

目的评价一种自粘接树脂水门汀RelyX~(TM) U_(200)与氧化锆陶瓷粘接的强度和耐久性。方法 90枚氧化锆瓷片(Y-TZP)喷砂处理后分别以"使用自粘接树脂水门汀RelyX~(TM) U_(200)(RU组)"和"氧化锆底涂剂处理+使用传统树脂水门汀RelyX Veneer(ZPRV组,对照组)"两种粘接策略制作Y-TZP/树脂水门汀/光固化复合树脂结构的粘接试件。两组试件分别按照以下三种方法进行处理:37℃水储24 h,30 000次冷热循环下进行人工老化,37℃水储6个月进行人工老化,随后测试试件的剪切粘接强度,分析断裂模式。按照剪切测试同样的两种粘接策略分别制作双瓷层粘接试件(n=10),以去离子水浸泡,电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)测试1、7、14、21、30、60和90 d的磷元素释放量。结果两种粘接策略提供了类似的氧化锆陶瓷与树脂间的粘接强度(P=0.841),这一粘接强度在老化处理后均降低(P<0.05),并且老化处理后各组试件的粘接断裂模式所占比例增加。RU组可获得与ZPRV组相等或更高的粘接耐久性。ICP-MS测试仅在Ctr-RU(单纯树脂水门汀RelyX~(TM) U_(200),对照组)、RU和ZPRV中检测到了磷元素的释放,随浸泡时间的延长,磷元素的释放呈现一定的增加。结论 RelyX~(TM) U_(200)树脂水门汀在无需底涂剂处理的条件下用于氧化锆陶瓷粘接可获得较好的粘接强度和粘接耐久性。     

氧化锆陶瓷与三种树脂粘接剂粘接剪切强度比较

目的探讨适合牙科氧化锆陶瓷的粘接材料。方法将烧结后的氧化锆陶瓷片分为3组,每组32片,分别采用三种自酸蚀粘接剂RelyX Unicem、PanaviaTM F、Superbond C﹠B与喷砂后的氧化锆陶瓷片粘接,水浴24h和水浴30d后,测试其粘接剪切强度。数据用SAS9.12软件进行统计学分析,粘接断面用扫描电镜观察。结果 PanaviaTMF树脂粘接材料粘接强度最好,分别为（31.36±3.49）MPa（水浴24h）、（29.52±3.44）MPa（水浴30d）。Superbond C﹠B能够取得较好的初期粘接强度（31.85±3.61）MPa（水浴24h）,但水浴30d后明显下降至（21.32±2.58）MPa,P〈0.05。RelyX Unicem的初期（水浴24h）粘接强度最小为（13.29±3.05）MPa,P〈0.0001,但水浴30d后粘接强度为（12.06±2.28）MPa,未见明显降低,P（0.05。结论含有MDP磷酸单体的树脂粘接材料可以使牙科氧化锆陶瓷获得最好的粘接效果。使用不含无机填料的化学固化型纯树脂粘接剂可以取得较好的初期粘接强度但长期效果欠佳。一步法自酸蚀树脂粘接剂虽然没有很高的初期粘接强度,但粘接效果尚能持久。     

不同粘接剂对二氧化锆桩固位力的影响

目的探讨不同粘接剂对二氧化锆桩与根管内牙本质粘接强度的影响。方法将60颗完整无龋坏的离体上颌中切牙自釉牙骨质界处截断牙冠,根管桩道预备,制作二氧化锆桩核。60颗牙随机分为6组,分别用磷酸锌水门汀、聚羧酸锌水门汀、玻璃离子水门汀i、Bond加LuxaCore双固化树脂、RelyX Unicem树脂、32%磷酸加ESPE RelyX Unicem树脂粘固二氧化锆桩核。万能力学试验机进行推出测试,记录粘接强度,并对数据行统计学分析。结果 32%磷酸加ESPE RelyX Unicem树脂组、ESPE RelyX Unicem树脂组i、Bond加Luxa Core树脂组、聚羧酸锌水门汀组、玻璃离子水门汀组、磷酸锌水门汀组的二氧化锆桩粘接强度分别为（15.06±1.80）MPa、（11.57±1.33）MPa（、10.42±1.24）MPa（、7.30±1.05）MPa（、6.99±0.87）MPa（、3.97±0.95）MPa,固位力依次降低。其中32%磷酸加ESPE RelyX Unicem树脂组的固位力显著高于其他组,两两比较差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;ESPE RelyX Unicem树脂组与Luxa Core树脂组之间（P=0.590）,聚羧酸锌组和玻璃离子组之间（P=0.490）的差异均无统计学意义;磷酸锌水门汀的粘接强度最低,与其它组比较差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论临床粘固二氧化锆桩,树脂类粘接剂固位力较强,自粘接系统加用酸蚀技术可以显著提高二氧化锆桩在根管内的粘接强度。     

三种自粘接树脂水门汀抗压强度的对比测定

目的：对比测定三种临床常用的自粘接树脂水门汀的抗压强度.方法：选用SmartCem2、Unicem、MaxcemElite 3种自粘接树脂水门汀,分别制作10个抗压强度试件,每种树脂水门汀试件分2组,每组5个样本,其中1组37℃水浴24h,另外一组试件37℃水浴30d,万能材料试验机测试其抗压强度值,采用SPSS 13.0软件进行统计分析.结果：①水浴24h组：SmartCem2、Unicem、MaxcemElite的抗压强度分别为280.14±16.40MPa、198.84±19.04MPa、346.11±22.17MPa,由高到低排序为MaxcemElite＞ SmartCem2＞ Unicem,组间两两比较均有统计学差异,P＜0.05;②水浴30d组：SmartCem2的抗压强度高于Unicem和MaxcemElite,P＜0.05,而Unicem和MaxcemElite组间比较无显著性差异,P＞0.05;③水浴30d后,SmartCem2的抗压强度值较水浴24h时明显提高,其它两种树脂水门汀抗压强度均降低.结论：与Unicem和MaxcemElite相比,SmartCem2具有较高的抗压强度,并且固化30d较24h的抗压强度值明显升高.     

3种树脂水门汀对CAD/CAM全瓷-牙本质剪切强度的比较

目的:评价3种树脂水门汀对CAD/CAM全瓷-牙本质剪切强度的影响。方法:选取新鲜拔除的人磨牙30颗,制备牙本质黏结面,随机分为3组(n=10),分别选用全酸蚀树脂水门汀RelyX ARC、自酸蚀树脂水门汀Clearfil DCBond和自黏结树脂水门汀RelyX Unicem对CAD/CAM硅酸锂玻璃全瓷进行黏结,测试3种树脂水门汀对CAD/CAM全瓷-牙本质的剪切强度,并通过立体显微镜观察牙本质的黏结界面。采用SPSS11.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果:RelyX ARC组的剪切强度为(15.90±6.15)MPa,Clearfil DC Bond组的剪切强度为(14.41±5.07)MPa,而RelyXUnicem组的剪切强度为(23.29±7.39)MPa,与前2组相比有显著性差异(P<0.05)。立体显微镜观察显示,3组黏结断面均位于牙本质与树脂水门汀之间。结论:自酸蚀树脂水门汀及自黏结树脂水门汀与CAD/CAM硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷修复体的黏结强度不低于传统全酸蚀树脂水门汀,且临床操作简便,为临床全瓷黏结提供了更多便利与选择。     

酸蚀处理对新型自粘结树脂水门汀粘结强度的影响

目的:评价酸蚀处理对新型自粘结树脂水门汀Unicem与牙本质和牙釉质之间粘结强度的影响。方法:选取新鲜拔除的无龋坏人第三磨牙36个,制备颊侧牙本质粘结面和近、远中牙釉质粘结面,随机分为3组,每组12个牙,分别选用Unicem、磷酸酸蚀配合Unicem和Panavia F(对照组)进行粘结处理,分别测试牙本质、牙釉质粘结强度,并通过扫描电镜观察粘结界面。结果:在牙本质粘结强度上,Unicem组(12.84±2.29 MPa)与Panavia F组(14.93±3.73 MPa)之间无显著性差异(P>0.05),但均显著高于磷酸酸蚀配合Unicem组(9.12±1.54 MPa)(P<0.05);牙釉质粘结强度上,磷酸酸蚀配合Unicem组(17.24±7.62 MPa)和Panavia F组(17.99±3.66 MPa)无显著性差异(P>0.05),但均显著高于Unicem组(6.47±1.54MPa)(P<0.05)。结论:酸蚀处理可以显著提高自粘结树脂水门汀Unicem牙釉质粘结强度,却降低了牙本质粘结效果。     

预成金属桩和纤维桩固位影响因素的剪切粘接实验

目的:比较纤维桩和预成金属桩使用不同粘接系统时根管各部的剪切粘接强度。方法:自制相同尺寸的碳纤维桩、预成金属桩,分别与全酸蚀系统ONE-STEP/C&B CEMENT或自粘接系统Rely X Unicem在人上颌中切牙根管内(n=6),用Synergie综合测试仪对各根管段行剪切粘接实验,行裂区方差分析。结果:剪切粘接强度分别为:纤维桩全酸蚀组:(11.14±1.26)MPa,纤维桩自粘接组:(5.04±0.94)MPa,金属桩全酸蚀组:(13.62±1.16)MPa,金属桩自粘接组:(7.80±1.36)MPa。预成金属桩剪切粘接强度优于碳纤维桩(P<0.000 1),全酸蚀系统优于自粘接系统(P<0.000 1)。根管各段由冠方向根方剪切粘接强度逐渐减弱。结论:预成桩修复的剪切粘接强度受桩材质、粘接系统及根管不同部位等因素的影响。     

粘接处理剂对自粘接树脂水门汀和RMGIC的牙本质粘接强度的影响

目的:实验评价牙本质粘接处理剂对自粘接树脂水门汀和树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)的牙本质微拉伸粘接强度的影响.方法:选用离体人无龋第三恒磨牙24颗,用低速切片机垂直于牙体长轴方向将磨牙冠(牙合)中1/3交界线处切开待用.实验组牙本质表面涂布牙本质粘接处理剂,对照组不涂粘接处理剂.后将试样分别用自粘接树脂水门汀(Unicem,3M ESPE;seT PP,SDI)或树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀(Fuji CEM,GC)原位对位粘接.水浴中储存24h后,用低速切片机把样本切割成约1mm×1mm×8mm条状,随后进行微拉伸测试.用扫描电镜观察粘接界面形貌.结果:无论是否使用粘接处理剂,Unicem的牙本质粘接强度显著高于seT PP 和Fuji CEM(P <0.01).与对照组相比,实验组的粘接强度显著提高(P <0.05).结论:粘接处理剂表面处理增强自粘接树脂水门汀及树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀的牙本质粘接强度.     

四种树脂水门汀黏结牙本质剪切强度的比较

目的:评价4种树脂水门汀与牙本质黏结剪切强度。方法:新鲜拔除的无龋损人第三磨牙48个,随机分为4组(n=12),制备颊侧牙本质黏结面,分别与4种树脂水门汀(Unicem、Panavia F、VariolinkⅡ、Vitique)黏结处理,测试剪切强度,SEM观察牙本质黏结界面。结果:4种树脂水门汀中RelyX Unicem(12.84±2.29)MPa与Panavia F(14.93±3.73)MPa、Vitique(11.03±2.57)MPa之间无显著性差异(P>0.05),而他们均显著高于VariolinkⅡ(5.43±1.25)MPa(P<0.05)。结论:新型自黏结树脂水门汀RelyX Unicem可以取得与牙本质良好的黏结效果,且美观,易于使用,节省操作时间,为黏结修复体提供了一种新的选择。     

含精氨酸的牙本质脱敏剂对玻璃陶瓷与牙本质微拉伸粘接强度及粘接界面的影响

目的：评估含8%精氨酸的脱敏牙膏与含0.8%精氨酸的脱敏漱口液对玻璃陶瓷和牙本质间微拉伸粘接强度及粘接界面的影响。方法：选择10颗正畸减数离体牙,去除牙合面釉质,暴露牙本质后,沿近远中向纵行切割分成3等分,依照牙本质处理方式的不同分为脱敏牙膏组,脱敏漱口液组及对照组。用RelyXTM Unicem 2自混自粘接树脂水门汀将牙本质面与玻璃陶瓷瓷块粘接。24 h后,将试件制备成横截面为1.0 mm ×1.0 mm的试件,用微拉伸仪测定粘接强度,用体式显微镜观察断裂类型,并用扫描电子显微镜观察粘接界面。结果：脱敏牙膏组(16.15±3.37) MPa和脱敏漱口液组(15.29±3.05) MPa微拉伸强度小于对照组(20.82±4.17) MPa（P<0.05）,脱敏牙膏组和脱敏漱口液组之间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。扫描电镜显示,对照组有树脂突深入牙本质小管,脱敏牙膏与脱敏漱口液组均无树脂突伸入牙本质小管。结论：含8%精氨酸的牙膏与含0.8%精氨酸的漱口液均可通过影响树脂突的形成降低玻璃陶瓷与牙本质的微拉伸粘接强度。     

Bonding of resin composite luting cements to zirconium oxide by two air-particle abrasion methods

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the shear bond strength of two resin composite luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramic substrate using two air-particle abrasion methods. METHODS: Two resin composite cements, RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE) and Panavia F (Kuraray), each with an acidic composition, were used in combination with a zirconium oxide (DCS Dental AG) substrate containing Al2O3 and SiO2 (Rocatec system, 3M ESPE) and two air-particle abrasion methods. The shear bond strength of the resin composite cement to the substrate was tested after the samples were either water-stored for one week or thermocycled following 24 hours of water storage. RESULTS: The RelyX Unicem resin composite cement specimens with the Rocatec treatment (20.9 +/- 4.6 Mpa and 20.1 +/- 4.2 MPa, respectively, n = 12) demonstrated the highest shear bond strength. Alternatively, the lowest values were obtained for the Panavia F resin cement samples, with Al2O3 air-particle abrasion in both storage conditions, water storage for one week (17.7 +/- 8.9MPa) or thermocycling after 24 hours of water storage (16.3 +/- 4.9 MPa). Neither storage condition or particle abrasion system significantly affected shear bond strengths (ANOVA, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that two different surface conditioning methods and storage conditions did not significantly affect the bonding properties of Panavia F and RelyX Unicem resin composite luting cements to Zirconia.     

Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of different cements to densely sintered zirconia ceramic after aging by thermocycling. METHODS: The following luting cements for bonding ZrO2-TZP (tetragonal zirconia polycrystals) were used in this study: Ketac-Cem, Nexus, Rely X Unicem, Superbond C&B, Panavia F, and Panavia 21. Groups of 30 test specimens were prepared by bonding stainless steel cylinders tribochemically silica-coated with the Rocatec-system to sandblasted ZrO2-TZP ceramic disks (cercon smart ceramics). Prior to testing all bonded specimens were stored in distilled water (37 degrees C) for 48 h and half of them (n=15) were additionally aged by thermocycling (10,000 times). RESULTS: None of the fractures occurred at the interface of the metallic rods. The assemblies failed either at the interface between the ceramic surface and the cements or within the cements. Thermocycling affected the bond strength of all luting cements studied except for both Panavia materials and Rely X Unicem. SIGNIFICANCE: Within the limits of this in vitro study the results showed that-after thermocycling-bond strengths for Ketac-Cem and Nexus were quite low. Nexus in combination with tribochemical silica-coating of ceramic surface produced a higher bond strength. The four adhesive resin cements (Rely X Unicem, Superbond C&B, Panavia F, and Panavia 21) gave superior results. The strongest bond to zirconia was obtained with Panavia 21.     

Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of etch-and-rinse and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin

Purpose: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of indirect composite restorations to dentin using three commercial resin cements after 24 hours and 30 days of water storage. Materials and Methods: The medium dentin of third human molars was exposed (N = 30, n = 10 per group). Three commercial resin cements were used to cement indirect resin composite restorations to dentin: the auto‐cured C&B Cement/All Bond 2, the dual‐cured RelyX ARC/Adper Single Bond 2, and the self‐adhesive dual‐cured RelyX Unicem. Teeth were sectioned after water storage at 37°C (24 hours and 30 days) to obtain beams with a bonded area of 0.8 mm². The specimens were tested in a universal testing machine at a 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. Scanning electron microscopic fractographic and interfacial micromorphology analyses were performed. Data were analyzed using two‐way ANOVA and Tukey′s test (α= 0.05). Results: Mean bond strength (MPa) after 24 hours: C&B Cement 19.5 ± 3.8, RelyX ARC 40.8 ± 9.4, RelyX Unicem 31.3 ± 7.4; after 30 days: C&B Cement 24.5 ± 5.1, RelyX ARC 44.2 ± 8.5, RelyX Unicem 28.3 ± 7.1. The mean bond strengths of both dual‐cure cements were significantly higher than that obtained with C&B Cement after 24 hours. A significant increase in the bond strength of C&B Cement was verified after 30 days, reaching values statistically equivalent to those produced by RelyX Unicem and RelyX ARC. The self‐adhesive cement preserved the same level of bond strength after 30 days. Fractographic analysis revealed a prevalence of cohesive fractures in the hybrid layer for C&B Cement, mixed (cohesive in the cement, hybrid layer, and adhesive) for RelyX ARC, and cohesive in the cement for RelyX Unicem. No distinguishable hybrid layer or resin tags were observed in the interaction of RelyX Unicem with dentin. Conclusions: The particular interaction of each cement with dentin results in specific bond strength and failure patterns that varied among groups in both evaluation times. Even though the self‐adhesive cement tested exhibited no authentic hybrid layer, it was able to promote reliable adhesion with the underlying dentin.     

3种树脂粘接水门汀与铸造纯钛粘接强度研究

目的：研究3种复合树脂粘固剂与铸造纯钛的粘接强度。方法：用牙科铸钛的方法制作直径分别为4mm和5mm的钛棒,切割成长度为4mm的小钛片。2种规格的钛片配对粘接面用400～1200目碳化硅砂纸在流水下打磨抛光,使之呈均匀一致的平面。50μm氧化铝喷砂,另一组表面不喷砂作为对照,分别使用Super-BondC＆B、Panavia F、Rely X Unicem 3种复合树脂粘固剂粘接。扫描电镜观察喷砂前后铸造纯钛的表面形态。复合树脂粘接剂固化后经37℃恒温水浴24h以及5000次5～55℃冷热循环,测试剪切强度。用SAS的ANOVA过程对各组数据进行分析。结果：喷砂前后纯钛与Panavia F的剪切强度最高,分别为（26.62±3.40）MPa、（23.71±5.28）MPa;5000次冷热循环后,喷砂组的铸造纯钛与Panavia F的剪切强度最高（27.12±8.68）MPa;未喷砂的铸造纯钛与Super-Bond C＆B、Rely X Unicem的粘接强度最低,并且有12.5%的脱落率。结论：本实验结果表明喷砂可以提高Super-Bond C＆B、Panavia F、Rely X Unicem的粘结力和粘结耐久力。不喷砂时,Panavia F与铸造纯钛之间能获得较高的粘接强度和良好的粘接耐久性,喷砂以后优势不再明显。     

Effect of surface treatment on the initial bond strength of different luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramic

The objective of this study was to compare the shear bond strength to zirconium oxide ceramic of adhesive-phosphate-monomer-containing (APM) and non-APM-containing (nAPM) luting cements after different surface treatments. nAPM cements: Bifix QM, Dual Cement, Duo Cement Plus, Multilink Automix, ParaCem Universal DC, PermaCem Smartmix, RelyX ARC, Variolink Ultra, and Variolink II; APM cements: Panavia EX, Panavia F2.0, and RelyX UniCem. Groups of ten test specimens were each prepared by layering luting cement, using cylindrical Teflon molds, onto differently treated zirconium dioxide discs. The surface treatments were airborne-particle abrasion with 110 μm alumina particles, silica coating (SC) using 30 μm alumina particles modified by silica (Rocatec System) or SC and silanization. Bifix QM and Multilink Automix were used in combination with an additional bonding/priming agent recommended by the manufacturers. After 48 h of water storage, each specimen was subjected to a shear test. Combinations involving APM-containing cements (14.41–23.88 MPa) generally exhibited higher shear bond strength than those without APM (4.29–17.34 MPa). Exceptions were Bifix QM (14.20–25.11 MPa) and Multilink Automix (19.14–23.09 MPa) in combination with system-specific silane or priming agent, which were on the upper end of shear bond strength values. With the use of the Rocatec system, a partially significant increase in shear bond strength could be achieved in nAPM cement. Modified surface treatment modalities increased the bond strength to zirconium oxide, although the most important factor in achieving a strong bond was the selection of a suitable cement. System-specific priming or bonding agents lead to further improvement.     

冷热循环对不同金属与树脂粘接剂粘接强度的影响

目的：冷热循环对不同金属与树脂粘接剂粘接强度的影响。方法：铸造直径分别为4mm和5mm的镍铬合金和纯钛,切割成长度为3mm的标本。2种规格的同种金属标本配对,金属表面经50μmAlzO3喷砂,涂布Al—loy Primer,使用Super—BondC＆B和PanaviaF2种粘接剂粘接。固化后经37℃恒温水浴24h以及10000次冷热循环,测试剪切粘接强度。用spssl7．0统计软件进行统计分析。结果：10000次冷热循环后,镍铬合金与Super—BondC＆B、纯钛与PanaviaF粘接强度显著提高（P〈O．01）,其余各组没有统计学差异。结论：粘接剂的种类对冷热循环前后的粘接强度没有明显影响,金属的种类对冷热循环前后的粘接强度没有明显影响,但是不同金属和不同粘接剂的配伍组合在冷热循环前后的粘接强度变化有统计学意义。     

不同树脂水门汀和瓷表面处理对玻璃陶瓷粘结强度的影响

目的：评价4种不同的树脂水门汀以及2种不同的瓷表面处理方法对玻璃陶瓷粘结强度的影响。方法：选用IPse．Max Press热压铸瓷制作直径分别为5mm和4mm，高2mm的圆柱形瓷片。经打磨抛光后分为喇大组：（1）4％氢氟酸酸蚀40sec，（2）4％氢氟酸酸蚀40sec＋硅烷化处理1min。各组内分别选用VariolinkII，Multflink Sprint，RelyX Unicem，BisCem将大小瓷片成对粘固。再分别经37℃水储24h，以及水储后冷热循环5000次测定剪切强度，并用电镜观察瓷片表面形态。结果：硅烷化处理能明显提高粘结强度。经HF＋硅烷处理后Multflink Sprint（31．7±4．5MPa），BisCem（29．2±4．4MPa）和RelyX Unicem（28．1±5．5MPa）3组显示出较VafiolinkII（21．8±4．2MPa）高的粘结强度。冷热循环后除硅烷处理且用VariolinkII和RelyX Unicem粘固的实验组外，其余各组粘结强度均显著下降。结论：4种树脂水门汀与经HF和硅烷联合处理的玻璃陶瓷问能达到理想的粘结强度。     

In vitro comparative bond strength of contemporary self-adhesive resin cements to zirconium oxide ceramic with and without air-particle abrasion

This study compared shear bond strengths of six self-adhesive resin cements to zirconium oxide ceramic with and without air-particle abrasion. One hundred twenty zirconia samples were air-abraded (group SB; n = 60) or left untreated (group NO). Composite cylinders were bonded to the zirconia samples with either BisCem (BC), Maxcem (MC), G-Cem (GC), RelyX Unicem Clicker (RUC), RelyX Unicem Applicator (RUA), or Clearfil SA Cement (CSA). Shear bond strength was tested after thermocycling, and data were analyzed with analysis of variance and Holm–Sidak pairwise comparisons. Without abrasion, RUA (8.0 MPa), GC (7.9 MPa), and CSA (7.6 MPa) revealed significantly higher bond strengths than the other cements. Air-particle abrasion increased bond strengths for all test cements (p < 0.001). GC (22.4 MPa) and CSA (18.4 MPa) revealed the highest bond strengths in group SB. Bond strengths of self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia were increased by air-particle abrasion. Cements containing adhesive monomers (MDP/4-META) were superior to other compositions.