Molecular and phenotypic determinants of the response to desmopressin in adult patients with mild hemophilia A

Summary. Background: The relationship of the biologic response to desmopressin with the F8 mutation and physiological characteristics has been poorly investigated in patients with mild hemophilia A. Objectives: We prospectively assessed the molecular and phenotypic determinants of the biologic response to desmopressin in a cohort of 50 patients with mild hemophilia A. Methods: Up to 24 h after desmopressin, blood samples were serially obtained and factor (F)VIII and von Willebrand factor (VWF) measured. The promoter region, all exons and exon–intron boundaries of the F8 gene were screened using denaturing high‐performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC). Direct sequencing was done when DHPLC screening was normal. Genomic DNA was also sequenced for exons 18–21, 24 and 27 of VWF. Results: Mean basal FVIII:C was 19 ± 9 IU dL^?1 (range 6–37) and the median postdesmopressin peak increase was 2.5‐fold (range 1.1–7.1). Eleven patients with a cross‐reacting material positive (CRM⁺) phenotype had similar basal levels and relative increases of FVIII:C to the remaining patients with low FVIII:Ag. Using multivariate regression, FVIII:C half‐life was positively related to basal and peak VWF:Ag levels (P = 0.008) and patient age (P = 0.004). Eleven patients had evidence of reduced FVIII survival. While 27 different gene mutations were identified in 41 patients, nine patients had no detectable mutation. These patients had significantly smaller peaks and smaller relative increase of postdesmopressin FVIII:C (median FVIII:C 26 IU dL^?1 vs. 54 IU dL^?1; P < 0.001; fold 1.8 ± 0.6 vs. 2.9 ± 0.8; P = 0.002). Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with mild hemophilia A, a poor biologic response to desmopressin was frequently associated with the absence of detectable F8 mutations.     

Hemophilia A and hemophilia B: focus on arthropathy and variables affecting bleeding severity and prophylaxis

Hemophilia A (HA) and hemophilia B (HB) are X‐linked, recessive disorders. Although their clinical manifestations are essentially indistinguishable, it has been suggested that bleeding episodes in patients with HA are generally more severe and occur at higher frequency than in patients with HB. Nevertheless, considerable debate remains regarding the relative severity of HA and HB. Based on the relative risk of undergoing joint arthroplasty, it appears that patients with HA have more severe joint deterioration compared with patients with HB. Although it is difficult to speculate on the factors that might modify bleeding severity in patients with hemophilia, recent observations indicate that other coagulation proteins, such as tissue factor pathway inhibitor or polymorphisms in coagulation factor genes and genetic defects associated with hypercoagulability may account for the variability in clinical phenotype among patients with hemophilia. Numerous studies have provided evidence supporting the clinical and social benefits of administration of clotting factor in prophylaxis. However, it is still unclear why this approach is more commonly utilized in patients with HA than in those with HB.     

Laboratory testing in hemophilia: Impact of factor and non‐factor replacement therapy on coagulation assays

The advent of extended half‐life (EHL) recombinant clotting factors and innovative non‐factor replacement therapeutics, such as emicizumab, offers several advantages over existing products for the prophylactic treatment of people living with hemophilia (PwH). These include low annual bleeding rates with less frequent dosing, higher trough plasma concentrations, and a more convenient route of administration. However, increasing use of these therapies poses challenges to clinicians and coagulation laboratories due to the lack of standardized assays for monitoring of hemostatic parameters, and the potential for misinterpretation of test results, which may jeopardize patient safety. Definitive diagnosis of hemophilia and treatment monitoring is reliant on demonstrating factor VIII (FVIII; hemophilia A) or factor IX (FIX; hemophilia B) deficiency using a functional coagulation assay. The most frequently used assays are based on activated partial thromboplastin time, using a one‐stage or two‐stage process. While one‐stage and chromogenic assays have performed well with human‐derived FVIII and FIX and full‐length recombinant products, EHL recombinant factors are heterogeneous in structure and mode of action and therefore show wide variation in activity levels between different one‐stage assays, and between one‐stage and chromogenic assays. In the context of the recommended stepwise approach for laboratory diagnosis of hemophilia, we examine the diagnostic challenges associated with the use of EHL factors and novel non‐factor therapeutics and consider the optimal diagnostic approach in PwH who are receiving these treatments. Ultimately, accurate diagnostic solutions are a prerequisite for personalized therapy to minimize treatment burden and improve quality of life in PwH.     

The measurement of low levels of factor VIII or factor IX in hemophilia A and hemophilia B plasma by clot waveform analysis and thrombin generation assay

BACKGROUND: Precise assessment of clotting function is essential for monitoring of hemostatic treatment for hemophilias A and B. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clot waveform analysis and thrombin generation assays were performed on factor (F) VIII- and FIX-deficient plasmas, which had been reconstituted with known amounts of recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) and affinity-purified FIX respectively. Clot waveforms were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively by measuring the parameters clotting time, maximum coagulation velocity (Min1), and maximum coagulation acceleration (Min2). The thrombin generation assay was also assessed qualitatively and measurements made of time to peak and peak height. RESULTS: Overall results obtained with both assays showed good correlation for both clotting factors confirming that the changes in clotting waveform reflected changes in thrombin generation. Both assays demonstrated a predictable dose response to the addition of FVIII or IX. However, clot waveform analysis was more sensitive than the thrombin generation assay, particularly in detecting very low levels (0-0.1 IU dL(-1)) of both factors. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the application of clot waveform analysis to the routine management of the hemophiliacs could increase our understanding of the clinical significance of low levels of FVIII and FIX that cannot be measured by assays in current use. This may be particularly useful in the management of hemophiliacs with inhibitors or undergoing gene therapy.     

T-cell responses over time in a mild hemophilia A inhibitor subject: epitope identification and transient immunogenicity of the corresponding self-peptide

BACKGROUND: Antibodies that neutralize factor (F) VIII activity, clinically referred to as 'inhibitors', complicate the treatment of hemophilia A patients; current tolerance and bypass strategies are extremely costly and sometimes ineffective. The development of inhibitors requires T-cell help. OBJECTIVES: We characterized T-cell responses of a subject with mild hemophilia A with missense genotype A2201P for one year following his initial inhibitor response, with the goals of defining the primary epitope(s) and its (their) MHC Class II restriction. We investigated the possible involvement of regulatory T cells in modulating immune responses. PATIENTS/METHODS: The subject developed high-titer FVIII-neutralizing antibodies (250 BU mL(-1)) that declined over time to 8 BU ml(-1). His clotting activity was initially impaired (3%) but returned to baseline (8-10%) within four weeks. MHC Class II tetramers were used to analyze his CD4 T cells, which were stimulated with peptides spanning the C2 domain. Responses of total and CD25-depleted CD4 cells to sequences containing A2201 (native), P2201 (hemophilic), and other predicted T-cell epitopes were evaluated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: An HLA-DRA-DRB1*0101 restricted T-cell epitope containing the wild-type A2201 sequence was identified. Interestingly, peptides containing A2201 were recognized by CD4 T cells at all time points, whereas a P2201 peptide was recognized only near the initial peak response. The responsiveness of CD25-depleted CD4 cells to an A2201 peptide was enhanced 11 and 19 weeks following inhibitor detection, suggesting the possible involvement of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in modulating immune responses. Patient-derived T-cell clones proliferated in response to C2 protein and to peptides containing A2201 but not P2201.     

Emergency department care for patients with hemophilia and von Willebrand disease

Patients with bleeding disorders such as hemophilia A, hemophilia B, and von Willebrand disease (VWD) are routinely treated at home, with their care managed in specialized centers. In emergency situations, these patients often present to their local emergency department (ED), where their management can represent a challenge to the emergency physicians and staff who rarely encounter them. Delays in diagnosis and administration of replacement therapy are the factors most commonly identified as predictive of death. Patients and family members are often very well educated in the disease and its management, which can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality. Children with bleeding disorders confer different challenges to the emergency physician and staff: they may present with no obvious signs of trauma or they may present with bruises consistent with non-accidental injury. All possible causes of bruising/bleeding should be investigated, although treatment should be administered promptly. The initial presentation of a bleeding disorder in the pediatric population is often made in the ED. Treatment of hemophilia A and B requires rapid replacement of the deficient clotting factor, with the desired factor level and dosage dependent on the product used and the hemorrhagic situation encountered. In patients with VWD, the main treatments are desmopressin or intravenous infusion of plasma-derived concentrates containing factor VIII and von Willebrand factor. The aim of this review is to outline some of the issues facing emergency physicians and the options available for the treatment of patients with hemophilia A, hemophilia B, and VWD.     

Intensive exposure to factor VIII is a risk factor for inhibitor development in mild hemophilia A

Summary.  Background : Inhibitors are rare in boys with mild hemophilia A (MHA; factor (F)VIII:C > 5%) but may arise following intense FVIII exposure, e.g. continuous infusion (CI). Objectives : To determine the impact of intense FVIII exposure in inhibitor formation in MHA at our institution and to compare this with previous reports. Patients and methods : We reviewed FVIII exposure and inhibitor development in boys (ages 0–18 years) with MHA followed at our institution from 1996 to 2001 and conducted a Medline search (1966–2002) on the experience of inhibitor development following intensive/CI exposure to FVIII. Results : We identified 54 boys with MHA. Twenty-nine (54%) had been exposed to FVIII. Seven had received FVIII by CI. Four developed inhibitors; three high titer (at ages 10 years, 16 years and 17 years) and one low titer (at 1 month old). All four had received a CI of recombinant (r) FVIII of at least 6 days within 6 weeks of developing inhibitors. Baseline FVIII levels fell to < 1% in all cases and the three with high-titer inhibitors developed severe bleeding. Immune tolerance therapy (ITT) was attempted in two boys and was successful in one. Our literature search identified 35 cases (only four children) with MHA developing inhibitors following intense FVIII exposure often in the context of surgery. Conclusions : The incidence of inhibitors in our MHA population was 7.4%. If expressed according to exposure the incidence was significantly higher: 14% (4/29) for any exposure to FVIII and 57% (4/7) for exposure by CI. A prospective study to address whether CI is associated with an increased incidence of inhibitor development in MHA is warranted.     

Spinal epidural hematoma as first presentation of hemophilia A

We describe a case of spinal epidural hematoma in a 12-year-old boy, who presented with the clinical triad of localized spine pain, radicular pain, and weakness. The lesion occurred as the first manifestation of a mild Factor VIII deficiency in a patient who was not previously diagnosed with hemophilia A. Early recognition of this condition and appropriate treatment with Factor VIII is imperative, along with neurosurgical consultation. It can make the difference in outcome between recovery and severe, persistent sequelae.     

Harmonization of clinical trial guidelines for assessing the risk of inhibitor development in hemophilia A treatment

Summary. At the present time, the most significant complication of hemophilia therapy is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) to factor (F) VIII, which adds greatly to the difficulty and expense of preventing and treating bleeding episodes. Both patient‐related and therapy‐related variables contribute to the development of inhibitors. The multifactorial nature of inhibitor development and the relatively small numbers of patients that participate in clinical trials make it difficult to accurately assess the risk of inhibitor development. Adding to that challenge is the lack of a uniform standard of design for conducting clinical trials to evaluate the safety of FVIII products. This hinders the comparison of products and is an obstacle to the meta‐analysis necessary to make statistically valid assessments of inhibitor risk. This article reviews similarities and differences in clinical trial guidelines of European and US regulatory agencies and discusses the need for their harmonization to facilitate the assessment of FVIII products.     

The humoral response to human factor VIII in hemophilia A mice

BACKGROUND: Inhibitory antibodies (Abs) to factor VIII (FVIII inhibitors) constitute the most significant complication in the management of hemophilia A. The analysis of FVIII inhibitors is confounded by polyclonality and the size of FVIII. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to dissect the polyclonal response to human FVIII in hemophilia A mice undergoing a dosage schedule that mimics human use. METHODS: Splenic B-cell hybridomas were obtained following serial i.v. injections of submicrogram doses of FVIII. Results of a novel, anti-FVIII domain-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were compared to Ab isotype and anti-FVIII inhibitory activity. RESULTS: The robust immune response resulted in the production of approximately 300 hybridomas per spleen. We characterized Abs from 506 hybridomas, representing the most comprehensive analysis of a protein antigen to date. Similar to the human response to FVIII, anti-A2 and anti-C2 Abs constituted the majority of inhibitors. A novel epitope was identified in the A2 domain by competition ELISA. Anti-A2 and anti-C2 Abs were significantly associated with IgG(1) and IgG(2a) isotypes, respectively. Because the IgG(2a) isotype is associated with enhanced Fc receptor-mediated effector mechanisms, this result suggests that anti-C2 Abs and inflammation may be linked. Additionally, we identified a novel class of Abs with dual specificity for the A1 and A3 domains. Forty per cent of the Abs had no detectable inhibitory activity, indicating that they are prominent and potentially pathologically significant. CONCLUSION: The expanded delineation of the humoral response to FVIII may lead to improved management of hemophilia A through mutagenesis of FVIII B-cell epitopes.     

Comparative immunogenicity of recombinant B domain‐deleted porcine factor VIII and Hyate:C in hemophilia A mice presensitized to human factor VIII

Summary. Hyate is a commercial plasma‐derived porcine factor (F)VIII concentrate that is used in the treatment of patients with inhibitory antibodies to FVIII. OBI‐1 is a recombinant B domain‐deleted form of porcine FVIII that is in clinical development for the same indication. Hemophilia A mice were presensitized with human FVIII to simulate clinical inhibitory antibody formation and then were randomized to receive OBI‐1 or Hyate:C in a comparative immunogenicity trial. OBI‐1 or Hyate:C were given in a series of four intravenous injections at weekly intervals at doses of 1, 10, or 100 U kg^?1. Inhibitory antibodies to porcine FVIII were not detected by Bethesda assay in most of the mice given OBI‐1 or Hyate:C at doses of 1 or 10 U kg^?1, but were identified in 81% and 94% of mice given 100 U kg^?1 of OBI‐1 or Hyate:C, respectively. There was no significant difference between OBI‐1 and Hyate:C in inhibitory antibody formation at any dose, although there was a trend toward a lower Bethesda titer in OBI‐1‐treated mice at 10 U kg^?1 (P = 0.09). Total anti‐FVIII antibodies to Hyate:C and OBI‐1 were also measured by ELISA using immobilized purified plasma‐derived porcine FVIII and OBI‐1, respectively, as antigens. At the 10 and 100 U kg^?1 doses, the mean anti‐FVIII response was higher in Hyate:C‐treated‐mice than in OBI‐1‐treated mice (P = 0.02 and P = 0.004, respectively). The results using this model suggest that OBI‐1 may be less immunogenic and safer than Hyate:C in FVIII inhibitor patients.     

Gene therapy, bioengineered clotting factors and novel technologies for hemophilia treatment

The World Federation of Hemophilia estimates that of the 400,000 individuals worldwide with hemophilia, 300,000 receive either no, or very sporadic, treatment. Thus, considerable innovation will be required to provide cost-effective therapies/cures for all affected individuals. The high cost of prophylactic regimens hampers their widespread use, which further justifies the search for novel cost-effective therapies and ultimately a cure. Five gene transfer phase I clinical trials have been conducted using either direct in vivo gene delivery with viral vectors or ex vivo plasmid transfections and reimplantation of gene-engineered cells. Although there was evidence of gene transfer and therapeutic effects in some of these trials, stable expression of therapeutic factor VIII or FIX levels has not yet been obtained. Further improvements of the vectors and a better understanding of the immune consequences of gene transfer is warranted, as new trials are being initiated. Bioengineered clotting factors with increased stability and/or activity are being validated further in preclinical studies. Novel clotting factor formulations based on PEGylated liposomes with prolonged activities are being tested in the clinic, and are yielding encouraging results.     

Heme binds to factor VIII and inhibits its interaction with activated factor IX

Summary. Background: Heme is a redox active macrocyclic compound that is released upon tissue damage or hemorrhages. The extracellular release of large amounts of heme saturates scavenging heme‐binding proteins. Free heme has been proposed to affect coagulation and has been co‐purified with the factor VIII (FVIII)‐von Willebrand factor (VWF) complex. The sites from which heme is released upon injury overlap with the sites to which FVIII is targeted for performing its hemostatic functions. Objectives: To investigate the interaction of heme with FVIII and the consequence for the procoagulant activity of FVIII in vitro. Methods and results: Heme bound to several sites on FVIII with high apparent affinity. Heme‐binding inhibited FVIII procoagulant activity in a dose‐dependent manner. FVIII inactivation in the presence of saturating amounts of heme implicated a reduced interaction of FVIII with activated FIX, as shown by ELISA, surface plasmon resonance and fluorescence quenching. Heme‐mediated inactivation of FVIII was prevented by VWF, but not by human serum albumin, a heme‐binding protein known for its protective activity in hemolytic conditions. Conclusions: Our data identify FVIII as a novel heme‐binding protein. Occupation of high affinity heme‐binding sites on FVIII at low concentrations of free heme did not inactivate FVIII. Conversely, large molar excesses of heme over FVIII, which correspond to conditions of extensive heme release, inhibited FVIII activity in vitro. It remains to be demonstrated whether, under such conditions, heme‐mediated modulation of the activity of FVIII plays some role in the regulation of coagulation.     

Body weight and fat mass index as strong predictors of factor VIII in vivo recovery in adults with hemophilia A

Summary. Background: The treatment of hemophilia A requires infusions of factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates. The number of units to be given in order to obtain the target level is calculated using the formula: [body weight (BW) × desired FVIII increase]/2, which assumes that each unit infused per kg of BW increases the FVIII level by 2%. Objectives: The present observational study evaluated the dependence of FVIII recovery on different morphometrical variables: BW, fat mass index (FMI), body mass index, and the difference between actual and ideal BW. Patients and methods: FVIII recovery was measured in 46 non‐actively bleeding hemophilia A patients, being treated with a recombinant FVIII concentrate. Regression trees were used to identify morphometrical predictors of recovery. Results: The median recovery was 2.08 for all patients, 2.63 for those with a BW ≥ 81.0 kg and 1.87 for others (P < 0.001). The recovery was significantly higher when FMI was ≥ 20% compared with FMI < 15% (median recovery: 2.35 vs. 1.74; P = 0.007). Using regression trees, three groups were created: BW < 80.5 kg and FMI < 22.3%, BW < 80.5 kg and FMI ≥ 22.3% and BW ≥ 80.5 kg. Median recovery in these groups was 1.80, 2.16 and 2.63, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The dose calculation of FVIII should take into account both BW and FMI, and be adapted to underweight or overweight patients. Comparison of the average recovery after different FVIII concentrates should keep in mind morphometrical patient characteristics.