Positive effect of counseling and dose adjustment in patients with erectile dysfunction who failed treatment with sildenafil

OBJECTIVE: Many patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) stop using sildenafil due to subjective failure. This study examined whether counseling and maximal dosing (100 mg) could achieve better treatment compliance and could possibly improve treatment outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were recruited by newspaper advertisements and referred to 5 ED centers throughout the country. Details about their previous experiences with sildenafil were recorded and following an explicit explanation about the nature and action of the drug, were offered to enter the study. Instructions on drug use were provided during each visit in which four 100 mg Sildenafil tablets were provided. Treatment outcomes were assessed by the international index of erectile function (IIEF) questionnaire after taking 4 and 8 tablets. In 2 ED centers a short video with sexual counseling content was added in between visits. RESULTS: The study cohort was comprised of 220 patients aged 27-88 years. The majority reported having received limited or no instructions on drug use when sildenafil was first prescribed. A significant increase in IIEF erectile function domain scores (EFDS) between visits 1, 2 and 3 was observed (10.96+/-0.40, 16.73+/-0.51 and 17.82+/-0.55 mean+/-SE, respectively), with 23.6% of the study patients achieving normal erectile function at the end of the study. The parameters of age and initial severity of ED most influenced treatment success. CONCLUSIONS: Counseling and dose adjustment were directly influential in achieving an excellent response to a second trial of sildenafil in patients with ED who had previously failed treatment with the drug, and obviated their needing to seek more invasive measures.     

The utility of sildenafil citrate for infertile men with sexual dysfunction: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use the sildenafil citrate, recognized as a first-line therapy for men with erectile dysfunction (ED), and which is safe and effective in men with various causes and severity of ED, including psychogenic ED, in a population of infertile men with sexual dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Infertility is a major source of life stress and might be associated with sexual dysfunction through the erosion of self-esteem and self-confidence, and in stimulating discord in a relationship. Men presenting for evaluation of fertility who on questioning by the physician reported the recent onset of sexual dysfunction, had a history taken, a physical examination, hormonal profile, and completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), a validated inventory for assessing sexual dysfunction. Thirty men with a score of <26 on the erectile function domain of the IIEF, or who complained of new onset rapid or delayed ejaculation, were treated with sildenafil with no randomization or placebo control. The evaluation was repeated and the IIEF completed again > or =3 months after starting treatment. RESULTS: For men complaining of ED, subjective erectile rigidity, duration of erection, and the percentage of successful penetration attempts significantly improved with sildenafil. The mean (sd) IIEF domain scores for erection and satisfaction, at 18 (4) vs 27 (3), and 12 (2) vs 16 (3) (both P = 0.01), and orgasm, at 4 (1) vs 6 (3) (P = 0.001), respectively, significantly improved after treatment. In patients with ejaculatory dysfunction, the function improved in 64% after sildenafil therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We identified the nature of sexual dysfunction associated with male-factor infertility, and showed the efficacy of sildenafil therapy in men with this condition.     

Efficacy of oral sildenafil in hemodialysis patients with erectile dysfunction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil to treat erectile dysfunction (ED) in chronic renal failure in patients on hemodialysis (HD). A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of oral sildenafil (50 mg) administered as required in HD patients with ED was designed. Patients on HD for at least 6 mo and who had a stable relationship with a female sexual partner were included. Patients older than 70 yr with penile anatomic abnormalities, cirrhosis, diabetes, angina, severe anemia, and those who were on nitrate treatment or with a recent history of stroke or myocardial infarction were not included. The International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF) was employed to evaluate ED and treatment response. Forty-one patients were evaluated (21 received placebo, and 20 sildenafil). Baseline clinical and demographic parameters were similar in both groups. Sildenafil was associated with improvement in the score of all questions and domains of the IIEF, except those related to sexual desire. Using the erectile function domain to evaluate primary efficacy, improvement was observed in 85% of the sildenafil patients compared with 9.5% of placebo patients. Sildenafil use resulted in normal EF scores in 35% of sildenafil patients. Sildenafil was well tolerated. Headaches and flushing occurred in both groups. Dyspepsia was reported by two patients in the sildenafil group. In conclusion, oral sildenafil seems to be an effective and safe treatment for ED in selected patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis.     

Erectile dysfunction in men with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a randomized study of the efficacy of sildenafil and continuous positive airway pressure

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of sildenafil and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). In all, 30 men were randomly treated for 12 weeks either with sildenafil 100 mg before intercourse (15 men) or CPAP during night time sleep (15 men). Under sildenafil, 97/180 (53.9%) of attempted intercourses were successful compared to 33/138 (23.9%) under CPAP. The mean IIEF (erectile function domain score) was 12.9 and 9.3 after sildenafil and CPAP treatment, respectively (P=0.007), compared to 7.9 and 7 at baseline. In all, 53.3% of patients were satisfied with sildenafil and 20% with CPAP for ED treatment (P=0.058). Although sildenafil was superior to CPAP, comorbidities and OSAS per se possibly resulted in a lower effectiveness of sildenafil compared to that in the general population of ED men. While about half of the patients were not satisfied even with the more effective treatment, we conclude that a combination of the two therapeutic tools or a different therapeutic mode should be studied further.     

Clinical efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in a multi-racial population in Singapore: A retrospective study of 1520 patients

BACKGROUND: Sildenafil citrate (Viagra), a selective inhibitor of cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase type-5, has been used as an oral therapeutic drug for erectile dysfunction. The present paper is a clinical study of the success rate and side-effects of the use of sildenafil in a multi-racial population in Singapore. METHODS: From April 1999 to May 2000, 1520 patients were given sildenafil citrate. Of these, 912 patients (mean age, 54.6 years; age range, 22-99 years) were followed up and evaluated for clinical efficacy and safety of the drug. The mean duration of erectile dysfunction (ED) and follow-up periods were 31.5 and 3.0 months, respectively. RESULTS: Satisfactory erections assessed by single global efficacy question (GEQ) occurred in 83% of patients, major side-effects in the form of flushing (3.48%), headache (1.97%), blurred vision (1.25%), giddiness (1.18%), warmth (1.11%) and others (4.92%) were recorded in 127 patients (13.9%). Racially, Chinese men with ED had higher efficacy (85.7%), compared to Indian men (74.2%) and Malay men (72.8%). With respect to comorbid profiles, an efficacy of 77.8% (n = 271), 83.9% (n = 292), 86.4% (n = 44) and 83.3% (n = 199) was recorded in diabetic, hypertensive, ischemic heart disease patients and in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients, respectively. Patients who smoked (n = 135) and drank alcohol (n = 118) showed an efficacy of 80%. Baseline hormonal profiles of luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, testosterone and prolactin did not affect the success rates of sildenafil citrate. Many patients had earlier received other forms of treatment (medicated urethral suppository for erection (MUSE; 84.9%); vacuum devices (86.8%), traditional medicines (100%) and other oral medications (89.2%)), but this did not influence the success rate of sildenafil citrate. But patients previously treated with prostaglandin-E intracavernosal injections were less successful on sildenafil citrate (77.3%). In the total cohort, 50 mg sildenafil citrate was an effective dose in 49% of patients and 46.5% patients needed 100 mg sildenafil citrate, while 4.1% of the total cohort needed only 25 mg sildenafil citrate. CONCLUSION: Oral sildenafil citrate has been shown to be an effective, safe and well tolerated drug in Singaporean men with ED, as in men from other parts of the world.     

Efficacy of sildenafil in erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy

Radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) is an important cause of iatrogenic erectile dysfunction (ED). While sildenafil has been widely used since its introduction as a new treatment option for ED, its efficacy in post-RRP patients has not been extensively studied. We retrospectively compared the efficacy of sildenafil in post-RRP and non-surgical patients with ED (NSED) using a subset of questions from the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and correlated results with their specific etiology of ED based on penile blood flow study (PBFS). A brief questionnaire regarding satisfaction with sildenafil was administered to 72 consecutive post-RRP patients (nerve sparing status unknown) and 32 consecutive NSED patients who had previously undergone PBFS with pharmacotesting as part of their evaluation for ED. PBFS diagnoses were arterial insufficiency (AI) for peak systolic velocity (PSV) < 25 cm/sec; venogenic (CVOD) for PSV > or = 35 cm/sec, mixed vascular for PV > 25 but < 35 cm/sec and resistive index (RI) < 0.9; a vascular normal diagnosis (neurogenic impotence) required excellent rigidity sustained for 20 min. Differences in the IIEF subscores for the different groups of patients were assessed. Success with sildenafil was defined as moderate or excellent improvement (3/4 or 4/4) with ability for penetration. No differences were found among the different subgroups of RRP patients with respect to IIEF scores or success rates with sildenafil. NSED patients had both significantly higher post-treatment IIEF scores (3.6/3.4 vs 2.5/2.2; t=4.50, P<0.0001) and success rates (63% vs 31%; t=3.11, P < 0.01) with sildenafil treatment than RRP patients. We found that sildenafil is significantly less effective in impotent RRP patients than in age-matched patients with ED (31% vs 63%). We had postulated that sildenafil would be least effective among RRP patients with excellent sustained rigidity to PGE1, as this subgroup is likely to have neurogenic impotence. We found that sildenafil response rates among subgroups of RRP patients were statistically similar regardless of PBFS diagnosis. IIEF scores for the RRP subgroups were similar but statistically lower than in men with ED and no history of RRP. While individuals with normal vascular responses to PGE1 have an increased likelihood of having neurogenic impotence, in RRP patients, we were unable to demonstrate any difference in efficacy of sildenafil, regardless of the PBFS diagnosis.     

Daily use of sildenafil improves endothelial function in men with type 2 diabetes

Diminished vascular endothelial function results in decreased vasodilator capacity and is associated with erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients afflicted with type 2 diabetes. The current study was designed to evaluate whether daily use of sildenafil could alter endothelial function and improve penile rigidity in a group of patients with diabetic ED. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective trial was conducted with 24 men with type 2 diabetes who were randomized into 2 groups: one receiving daily sildenafil (50 mg, n = 12) and the other placebo (n = 12) for 10 weeks. Erectile function was captured subjectively using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), and endothelial function was objectively monitored via brachial artery flow-mediated dilation. Among the placebo and sildenafil groups, there were no significant differences in average patient age, time from type 2 diabetes diagnosis, duration of ED, or baseline IIEF-5 scores. Past medical histories, including smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, were also similar. At the conclusion of the 10-week trial, patients who received daily sildenafil had significantly improved erectile rigidity as captured by IIEF-5 (P < .001) and increased endothelial function via brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (P < .01). Endothelial function in men with type 2 diabetes was enhanced with daily sildenafil. Improved erectile rigidity and enhanced vascular circulation was noted after 10 weeks of daily sildenafil use.     

Combining programmed intracavernous PGE1 injections and sildenafil on demand to salvage sildenafil nonresponders

In a prospective, placebo-controlled, one group crossover design study, we tested whether adding programmed intracavernous PGE1 injections (IC-PGE1) can improve the effectiveness of sildenafil in erectile dysfunction (ED) patients unresponsive to monotherapy with this drug. In all, 40 ED patients who had experienced unsatisfactory erections with both the 50 and 100 mg sildenafil doses were treated with four bi-weekly 20 microg IC-PGE1 injections given in the clinic and provided with either placebo or 50 mg sildenafil capsules for the next 4 weeks. Thereafter, they were crossed over to the other oral treatment for an additional 4-week period. The IIEF-Erectile Function domain score (IIEF-EFS), the main outcome measure, was found considerably higher (P<0.001) with the combined IC-PGE1-50 mg sildenafil treatment than with IC-PGE1-placebo or sildenafil alone (50 or 100 mg) in a subset of 26 subjects (65%). They thus shifted from the 'severe' or 'moderate' to the 'mild' grading of ED classification.     

Switching from long-term treatment with self-injections to oral sildenafil in diabetic patients with severe erectile dysfunction

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of oral sildenafil in diabetic men with severe erectile dysfunction (ED), who are successfully treated with intracavernous injections of vasoactive drugs. METHODS: 81 impotent diabetic men (29 with type 1 and 52 with type 2) were treated for 1-7 years with self-injections. 13 men were treated with 10 microg and 15 with 20 microg of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1), and 53 with a mixture of PGE1 20 microg and papaverine 7.5-40 mg (MIX). After a 1-week washout period, they changed to oral sildenafil in titrating doses up to 100mg. The change was successful if the man achieved an erection and penetration even once. RESULTS: Sildenafil was discontinued in 23 men because of insufficiency. Eleven men (13.6%), all with type 2 diabetes, responded to sildenafil (10 previously treated with 10 microg and 1 with 20 microg of PGE1, none treated with MIX). Thus, 39.2% of the treated with PGE1 responded to oral sildenafil. The response was influenced by the age, the type of diabetes (type 2) and the kind of the previously injected drug (PGE1 10 microg); it was not influenced by the duration of diabetes, ED and treatment with self-injections. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the well documented efficacy of sildenafil, self-injections continue to be the solely effective therapeutic modality in many diabetic men afflicted by severe ED. Only the younger men with non-insulin-dependent diabetes, treated with low doses of PGE1 are more likely to respond to oral sildenafil and change treatment. Men with insulin-dependent diabetes or treated with mixtures of vasoactive drugs are not likely to respond to oral sildenafil.     

Long-term efficacy and safety of oral Viagra (sildenafil citrate) in men with erectile dysfunction and the effect of randomised treatment withdrawal

The long-term efficacy and safety of oral Viagra (sildenafil citrate), a selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, and the effect of withdrawing treatment were evaluated in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). In 233 men with ED of psychogenic or mixed organic/psychogenic aetiology, 16 weeks of open-label, flexible-dose sildenafil treatment (10-100 mg) was followed by eight weeks of double-blind, fixed-dose, randomised withdrawal to placebo or continued treatment with sildenafil. Sildenafil was taken as needed (not more than once daily) approximately 1 h prior to sexual activity. The main outcome measures were a global efficacy question, a sexual function questionnaire, an event log of erections, and adverse event recording. In the open-label phase, 200 of 216 patients (93%) reported improved erections with sildenafil; 28 patients (12%) discontinued treatment. In the double-blind phase, the significant improvements in the frequency and duration of erections were maintained in the sildenafil group but returned to pre-treatment values in patients on placebo (P values < 0.0001 versus placebo). The most frequent adverse events in the sildenafil group during the double-blind phase were flushing (7%), headache (6%), and dyspepsia (5%). Of the 192 patients enrolled in the 1-y extension, 90% completed the study; only two patients (1%) were withdrawn due to lack of efficacy. In men with ED of psychogenic or mixed aetiology, oral sildenafil is effective and well-tolerated both at the initiation of therapy and during long-term treatment. For most patients, sildenafil treatment must be continued for improvements in erectile function to be maintained.     

Efficacy and safety of sildenafil for treating erectile dysfunction in patients on dialysis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of sildenafil for erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients on haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD), as men with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) often have sexual dysfunction (up to 82% among those on chronic dialysis). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with ED and in ESRD participated in an open-label prospective study. Thirty patients on HD and 11 on PD were asked to complete the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Fugl-Meyer life-satisfaction scale before and after sildenafil treatment. A total score in the erectile function domain of < or = 25 was accepted as indicating ED. All patients were started on a 25-mg dose, which was increased to 50 mg if there was no response after two trials. In addition, the overall efficacy question was used to evaluate satisfaction, and patients reported any side-effects during treatment. RESULTS: The erectile function and intercourse satisfaction domains improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.01). After sildenafil treatment, two-thirds of those on HD (20/30) and nine of the 11 on PD recovered their erectile function. The pretreatment scores on the IIEF and four domains (except sexual desire) of those responding were significantly higher than in those not responding (P < 0.05). The satisfaction rate on the overall efficacy question was 80% and 82% for the HD and PD groups, respectively. At least one side-effect was seen in 17 patients (43%); one had severe hypotension in the PD group. Overall, mild headache (seven patients, 18%) and flushing (12, 30%) were reported most often. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil is a safe and satisfactory drug for improving erectile function in patients with ESRD. Patients were satisfied whether treated by HD or PD. Pretreatment scores on the IIEF may be useful for predicting the success of treatment.     

Efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil in men with erectile dysfunction and spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of sildenafil in men with spinal cord injury (SCI) and erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: Seventeen men with SCI were selected from February to September 1998 for sildenafil treatment of ED. The initial dose of 25 mg was increased by 25-mg increments as needed. Patients underwent baseline physical examination and answered questions from the abridged International Index of Erectile Function before and during therapy. RESULTS: Sixteen patients tolerated therapy; 1 developed hypotension and discontinued therapy. There was significant improvement in erectile function (P < .05) after 5.3 +/- 2.2 months when compared with baseline or previous therapies (P < .05). Of the 17 patients, 94% recommended sildenafil to others. Six of these 16 patients were available for long-term follow-up. There was further significant improvement in quality of erection (P < .05), but no change in satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Sildenafil is effective and well tolerated in men with SCI and ED.     

Chronic sildenafil improves erectile function and endothelium-dependent cavernosal relaxations in rats: lack of tachyphylaxis

OBJECTIVES: Sildenafil is a widely-prescribed effective on-demand treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Chronic treatment with sildenafil could help patients with ED. METHODS: The effects of an 8-week long treatment with sildenafil (60 mg/kg/d sc) in male Sprague Dawley rats were evaluated on electrically-elicited erectile responses in vivo before and after an acute injection of sildenafil (0.3mg/kg iv). In addition, endothelium-dependent and -independent relaxations of strips of corpus cavernosum in vitro were examined. All experiments were performed 36 hours after the last injection of sildenafil. RESULTS: Endothelium-dependent relaxations of cavernosal strips to acetylcholine were enhanced after chronic treatment with sildenafil while relaxations to A23187 or sodium nitroprusside were unchanged. Frequency-dependent erectile responses elicited by cavernous nerve stimulation were significantly improved. Moreover, the erectile responses to acute sildenafil were greater in chronically-treated rats with sildenafil. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report providing experimental support for chronic dosing with sildenafil which could be of use for patients that are poor responders to on-demand treatment. Chronic sildenafil may regulate the transduction pathway leading to the activation of eNOS but has no effect on NO bioavailability or on the cGMP pathway, thereby eliminating a possible concern for tachyphylaxis.     

Effect of sildenafil on nocturnal erections of potent men

We try to evaluate the effect of sildenafil on nocturnal penile erections of potent men. We recruited 22 potent men (eight medical students and 14 urology residents) 23-29 years old into the study. A disorder-free medical and sexual history and normal erectile functions were the only inclusion criteria. All subjects completed three sessions of consecutive nights using the RigiScan Plus device. After a first night of adaptation, night 2 recordings were their baseline values whereas they received sildenafil 100 mg on night 3. We observed statistically significant improvement with regard to those NPT parameters at the nights with sildenafil: number of erectile episodes; duration of tip rigidity >60%, RAU tip, RAU base and TAU tip (P<0.005). Although the duration of erectile episodes (min) and TAU base were greater during the sildenafil night, these did not reach statistical significance. In conclusion, our study showed that sildenafil can improve nocturnal erectile quality not only in patients with erectile dysfunction as previously published but also in potent males.     

Efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate for treatment of erectile dysfunction in a population with associated organic risk factors.

The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of sildenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) and associated organic risk factors in a multispecialty clinic. Patients (n = 521) were diagnosed with ED based on self-assessment. Associated risk factors were managed by medication or life-style modifications, or both, before treatment with sildenafil for ED. Patients received a 50-mg dose of sildenafil that could be adjusted to 100 mg or 25 mg based on tolerability and efficacy. Patients recorded the number of successful intercourse encounters for 6 to 8 weeks, and the number of adverse events. Overall, there was an 82% successful intercourse rate with sildenafil treatment. The predominant associated risk factors for ED were hypertension (39%), hypogonadism (37%), and multiple medications (34%). Common adverse events due to sildenafil treatment were mild to moderate in nature and resulted in <2% patient discontinuation. Clinicians should be particularly careful to evaluate patients presenting with ED because the condition can be accompanied by a wide spectrum of risk factors requiring monitoring and treatment. However, with adequate treatment and control of these risk factors, the use of sildenafil in a representative population of men with ED in a multispecialty clinic can achieve a higher efficacy rate than previous studies have indicated.     

Efficacy of sildenafil as the first-step therapeutic tool for Japanese patients with erectile dysfunction

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of sildenafil as the first-step tool for erectile dysfunction (ED) in Japanese males. Between March 1999 and March 2003, 281 patients were prescribed five tablets of sildenafil (50 mg) as the first step in the therapeutic management of ED. Of the 281 patients, 206 were evaluable patients. The overall success rate in achieving sexual intercourse in subjects after taking sildenafil was 77.2% (159/206), while 22.8% (47/206) were unsuccessful. The success rates in men with functional ED and organic ED were 91.4% (85/93) and 65.5% (74/113), respectively (P<0.0001). Overall, transient adverse effects of sildenafil occurred in 16 (8%) males. Intolerable adverse effects (edema and dizziness) occurred in only 1% of patients (2/206). Sildenafil citrate may be recommended as the first choice drug for ED because of its high success rate and low invasiveness.     

长期口服小剂量伐地那非治疗按需服药无效ED的疗效观察

目的:评估持续口服小剂量伐地那非治疗按需服药无效的勃起功能障碍(ED)患者的疗效及停药后效果维持状况.方法:将按需服药无效的39例ED患者改用长期口服小剂量伐地那非治疗3个月,在治疗前后及停药后3个月分别记录患者国际勃起功能指数-5(International index of erectile function-5,IIEF-5)评分及患者性生活日记中插入和保持勃起的成功率,并且记录治疗前后夫妻性满意度.结果:本组患者治疗后主要疗效指标均高于治疗前,且治疗前后指标差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);停药后3个月,主要指标仍高于基线水平,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:每天口服小剂量伐地那非对约半数(48.6%)按需服药无效的ED患者,可改善勃起功能,且安全、有效.     

Therapeutic effectiveness and patient satisfaction after 6 months of treatment with tadalafil, sildenafil, and vardenafil: results from the erectile dysfunction observational study (EDOS)

OBJECTIVE: This observational study was conducted across Europe to assess health outcomes in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) who took tadalafil, sildenafil citrate (sildenafil), or vardenafil HCl (vardenafil) for 6 mo. METHODS: Therapy effectiveness and patient satisfaction were evaluated using established and new questions on erectile function. Behavioural, psychological, and relationship outcomes were assessed using the short form of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (SF-PAIRS). RESULTS: In nine European countries at 904 sites, 8047 patients were enrolled and 94% (7560) selected either tadalafil (5315), sildenafil (1252), or vardenafil (993) for treatment at baseline. Of the 7560, 3998 (52.9%) took the same drug for 6 mo. Baseline characteristics across the three treatment groups were comparable: mean age approximately 56 yr, moderate or severe ED, and mean International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain score about 13. Tadalafil, sildenafil, and vardenafil were therapeutically effective and improved patient satisfaction in the 40-58% of men who completed 6 mo of a single therapy. Patients taking tadalafil consistently had numerically higher levels of therapeutic effectiveness and satisfaction compared with patients who took sildenafil or vardenafil. The three cohorts had statistically significant changes from baseline in response to SF-PAIRS and there were significant differences, in favour of tadalafil, among cohorts in the Time Concerns domain. CONCLUSION: In a large observational study that mimics a routine clinical setting, most patients selected an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 5 to treat ED, which resulted in a high level of therapeutic effectiveness and patient satisfaction.     

Efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in men in Egypt and South Africa

The efficacy of sildenafil citrate (Viagra), an oral agent for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), has been demonstrated in global studies. This 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, flexible-dose study assessed the efficacy and safety of sildenafil to treat ED in men in Egypt and South Africa. Men with ED of varied etiology were randomized to receive sildenafil 50 mg (n=128) or placebo (n=126); doses could be adjusted to 100 or 25 mg. Questions from the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) assessing the ability to achieve (Q3) and maintain (Q4) erections demonstrated a significant improvement with sildenafil compared with placebo (P<0.0001). Improved erections were reported by 74% of patients receiving sildenafil and 27% of those receiving placebo (P<0.0001). Headache, dyspepsia, and flushing were the most common adverse events in sildenafil-treated patients. These results are consistent with clinical trials in other countries. We conclude that sildenafil is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for men with ED in Egypt and South Africa.