Individualized surgical strategies for cancer of the esophagogastric junction

Due to their borderline location between the stomach and esophagus the optimal surgical strategy for patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction is controversial. Irrespective of the surgical approach a complete removal of the primary tumor and its lymphatic drainage has to be the primary goal of surgical treatment of such tumors. Based on the experience with surgical resection of more than 1000 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction we recommend an individualized surgical strategy guided by tumor stage and topographic location of the tumor center or tumor mass. This requires detailed preoperative staging and classification of tumors arising in the vicinity of the esophagogastric junction into adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (AEG Type I Tumors), true carcinoma of the gastric cardia (AEG Type II Tumors) and subcardial gastric carcinoma infiltrating the esophagogastric junction (AEG Type III Tumors). In patients with Type I Tumors transthoracic esophagectomy offers no survival benefit over radical transmediastinal esophagectomy, but is associated with higher morbidity. In patients with Type II or Type III tumors an extended total gastrectomy results in equal or superior survival and less postoperative mortality than a more extended esophagogastrectomy. In patients with early tumors, staged as uT1 on preoperative endosonography, a limited resection of the proximal stomach, cardia and distal esophagus with interposition of a pedicled isoperistaltic jejunal segment allows a complete tumor removal with adequate lymphadenectomy and offers excellent functional results. Multimodal treatment protocols with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or combined radiochemotherapy followed by surgical resection appear to markedly improve the prognosis in patients with locally advanced tumors who respond to preoperative treatment. With this tailored approach extensive preoperative staging becomes mandatory for an adequate selection of the appropriate therapeutic concept.     

Adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction.

BACKGROUND: The border between the esophagus and stomach gives rise to many discrepancies in the current literature regarding the etiology, classification and surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma arising at the esophago-gastric junction. We have consequently used the AEG-criteria (adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction) for classification and have based the selection of the surgical approach on the anatomic topographic subclassification. METHODS: In the following we report an analysis of a large and homogeneously classified population of 1602 consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction, with an emphasis on the surgical approach, the pattern of lymphatic spread, the outcome after surgical treatment and the prognostic factors. Demographic data, morphologic and histopathologic tumor characteristics, and long-term survival rates were compared among the three tumor subclassifiations. RESULTS: The study confirms the marked differences in sex distribution, associated specialized intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus, tumor grading, tumor growth pattern, lymphatic spread, and stage between the three tumor entities. The degree of resection and lymph node status were the dominating independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. The data show no significant differences of long-term survival after abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy and extended total gastrectomy in these patients. CONCLUSION: The classification of adenocarcinomas of the esophago-gastric junction in three types, AEG type I, type II and type III shows marked differences between the tumor entities and is recommended for selection of a proper surgical approach. Complete tumor resection and adequate lymphadenectomy are associated with good long-term prognosis. Better surgical management and standardized procedures will improve the outcome also of patients who need to undergo more radical surgery, i.e. abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy.     

Limited resection for early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus

OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent of disease in patients with pT1 esophageal adenocarcinoma and to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of a limited surgical approach. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Radical esophagectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy is widely advocated as the treatment of choice in patients with early adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. This approach, however, is associated with substantial complications and long-term side effects. The extent of resection necessary to achieve cure in such patients is not clear. METHODS: Seventy-one patients with pT1 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus underwent transmediastinal or transthoracic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Twenty-four patients with uT1N0 tumors underwent a limited resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction, regional lymphadenectomy, and reconstruction by interposition of an isoperistaltic pedicled jejunal segment. The two groups were compared for extent and multicentricity of the primary tumor and associated high-grade dysplasia, pattern of lymph node metastases, complications, deaths, and outcome of surgical treatment. RESULTS: Multicentric tumor growth or associated high-grade dysplasia was observed in 60.6% of the resection specimens. Complete resection of the tumor and the entire segment with intestinal metaplasia was achieved in all patients, irrespective of the surgical approach. Patients undergoing limited resection had fewer complications. Lymph node metastases or micrometastases were present in none of the 38 patients with tumors limited to the mucosa (pT1a) versus 10 of the 56 (17.9%) patients with tumors invading the submucosa (pT1b). Distant lymph node metastases occurred only in patients with more than three positive regional lymph nodes. Lymph node metastases were prognostic, but the pT1a/pT1b category and the surgical approach were not. The mean Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index after limited resection did not differ from that of healthy controls: 20 of the 24 patients were completely asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with early adenocarcinoma in the distal esophagus, resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction, with regional lymphadenectomy and jejunal interposition, is an attractive limited surgical alternative to radical esophagectomy.     

Two Different Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Adenocarcinoma at the Gastroesophageal Junction

BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinoma at the gastroesophageal junction may be regarded as of esophageal or of gastric origin, and tumor removal may follow the principles of esophagectomy or extended gastrectomy. We determined the impact of this strategy on our patients with tumors at this site. METHODS: Baseline patient and tumor characteristics were collected, and tumors were categorized according to Siewert's classification (I, II, or III) of gastroesophageal junction tumors. Totally, 133 patients were operated on between 1990 and 2001. Ninety-six patients with type I (n = 67), II (n = 26), and III (n = 3) tumors underwent esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction, and 37 patients with type I (n = 5), II (n = 26), and III (n = 6) tumors underwent extended gastrectomy and long Roux-en-Y reconstructions. RESULTS: After adjusting for the independently significant impact factors-tumor stage, tumor dissection (R0-R2), and length of tumor free resection margins-we did not find any specific survival benefit associated with either of the two evaluated surgical approaches for tumor resection and reconstruction. The EORTC quality of life forms revealed good results as indicated by the functional scales and the symptom scales. CONCLUSIONS: Provided that adequate tumor dissection is performed, patients with adenocarcinoma at the gastroesophageal junction can be resected and reconstructed using the principles for esophagectomy or extended gastrectomy.     

Esophagogastric tube reconstruction with stapled pseudo-fornix in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a novel technique proposed for Siewert type II tumors

Purpose

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction is increasing, but laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy is not widely accepted due to the absence of a standardized technique of reconstruction. This report describes a novel technique of esophagogastric tube reconstruction in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for Siewert type II tumors.

Methods

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy, sometimes with transhiatal distal esophagectomy, was performed. After a perigastric, suprapancreatic, and lower thoracic paraesophageal lymphadenectomy, a gastric tube of 35-mm width was prepared. An esophagogastric tube anastomosis with pseudo-fornix was made with a no-knife linear stapler to prevent postoperative reflux esophagitis.

Results

Fifteen patients with Siewert type II tumors underwent this operation. They included six patients with early-stage cancer, six at high risk for transhiatal total gastrectomy due to several comorbidities, and three who needed palliative tumor resection. The mean operation time was 315 min. One postoperative anastomotic leak was treated conservatively, and three anastomotic stenoses were resolved with endoscopic balloon dilatation. Postoperative 1-year follow-up endoscopy revealed four cases of reflux esophagitis that were well controlled by medication.

Conclusions

This new technique of reconstruction was feasible. With the advantage of a gastric tube, a tension-free anastomosis was possible even for bulky tumors that needed lower esophagectomy. Although long-term follow-up and a larger number of patients are required to evaluate long-term functional outcomes and oncological adequacy, our procedure has the potential of becoming a treatment of choice for early-stage Siewert type II tumors and/or for some selected high-risk patients who need tumor resection.     

���г�ʳ��θ��ϲ��ٰ���ʽѡ��

近年来,食管胃结合部腺癌(AEG)发病率呈上升趋势,手术为该病的主要治疗手段,但目前国人对该病概念较模糊,导致手术选择(包括手术入路、切除范围、淋巴结清扫范围等方面)多样,甚至存在争议。对肿瘤进行充分的分型、分期评估,遵循个体化治疗原则,是为病人选择科学合理的术式的前提和基础。对于SiewertI型AEG病人可行经胸经裂孔食管下段切除术、经颈、胸、腹三切口手术等;SiewertⅡ型AEG病人术式选择和手术入路存在较多的争议,经腹行全胃切除+腹部及纵隔淋巴结清扫被认为是进展期SiewertⅡ型AEG的首选术式,只有全胃切除才能保证进展期AEG足够无瘤切缘和淋巴结清扫范围,早期SiewertⅡ型AEG病人可行近端胃切除及相应淋巴结清扫;Ⅲ型AEG则按近端胃癌手术原则处理。进展期AEG是否联合脾切除尚存争议。目前不建议行常规脾切除术,只有在脾门受侵或有明确的淋巴结转移时,才考虑行脾切除。     

Limited surgical resection and jejunal interposition for early adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus

The need for radical resection and extensive lymphadenectomy for early adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus has recently been challenged. Limited surgical resection and endoscopic mucosal ablation techniques are increasingly proposed and used as less invasive alternatives. Available data indicate that a limited resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction with jejunal interposition is associated with less morbidity and mortality, provides similar oncologic results, and offers a better quality of life as compared with radical esophagectomy. In contrast, endoscopic ablation and mucosectomy techniques are still plagued by high tumor recurrence rates, particularly in patients with incomplete removal of the underlying Barrett's mucosa, multicentric tumors, or tumors invading into the submucosa. Attention to technical details of limited resection and jejunal interposition is, however, required to avoid complications, poor functional results, and the need for reintervention.     

Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether extended transthoracic esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus improves long-term survival. BACKGROUND: A randomized trial was performed to compare surgical techniques. Complete 5-year survival data are now available. METHODS: A total of 220 patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (type I) or gastric cardia involving the distal esophagus (type II) were randomly assigned to limited transhiatal esophagectomy or to extended transthoracic esophagectomy with en bloc lymphadenectomy. Patients with peroperatively irresectable/incurable cancer were excluded from this analysis (n = 15). A total of 95 patients underwent transhiatal esophagectomy and 110 patients underwent transthoracic esophagectomy. RESULTS: After transhiatal and transthoracic resection, 5-year survival was 34% and 36%, respectively (P = 0.71, per protocol analysis). In a subgroup analysis, based on the location of the primary tumor according to the resection specimen, no overall survival benefit for either surgical approach was seen in 115 patients with a type II tumor (P = 0.81). In 90 patients with a type I tumor, a survival benefit of 14% was seen with the transthoracic approach (51% vs. 37%, P = 0.33). There was evidence that the treatment effect differed depending on the number of positive lymph nodes in the resection specimen (test for interaction P = 0.06). In patients (n = 55) without positive nodes locoregional disease-free survival after transhiatal esophagectomy was comparable to that after transthoracic esophagectomy (86% and 89%, respectively). The same was true for patients (n = 46) with more than 8 positive nodes (0% in both groups). Patients (n = 104) with 1 to 8 positive lymph nodes in the resection specimen showed a 5-year locoregional disease-free survival advantage if operated via the transthoracic route (23% vs. 64%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: There is no significant overall survival benefit for either approach. However, compared with limited transhiatal resection extended transthoracic esophagectomy for type I esophageal adenocarcinoma shows an ongoing trend towards better 5-year survival. Moreover, patients with a limited number of positive lymph nodes in the resection specimen seem to benefit from an extended transthoracic esophagectomy.     

The pattern of metastatic lymph node dissemination from adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

BACKGROUND: The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction is rapidly increasing, and the extent of lymphadenectomy for such tumors remains controversial. The aim of this study was to identify the pattern of dissemination by examination of all lymph nodes retrieved from resected tumors of the esophagogastric junction. METHODS: The endoscopic and pathologic reports of patients who underwent RO resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction between January 1996 and November 1999 were examined. Patients with type 1 tumors (distal esophagus) underwent subtotal esophagectomy with 2-field lymphadenectomy. Patients with type 2 (gastric cardia) tumors underwent transhiatal D2 total gastro-esophagectomy. Lymph node groups were dissected from the main specimens and examined separately. RESULTS: One hundred and four type 1 and 48 type 2 tumors were studied. Median nodal recovery was 23 lymph nodes (type 1, 22 lymph nodes; type 2, 23 lymph nodes). Seventy-eight percent of the type 1 tumors with nodal metastases had dissemination in both the abdomen and mediastinum. The common abdominal sites were the paracardiac and the left gastric stations. Within the mediastinum, paraesophageal, paraaortic and tracheobronchial metastases were more often encountered. Type 2 tumors had positive lymph nodes most frequently in the left and right paracardiac, lesser curve (N1 group), and left gastric (N2 group) territories. Nodal status correlated with increasing depth of tumor invasion (P =.002). CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of nodal dissemination for cardia tumors concurs with that described by other studies. The current definition of nodal fields in the abdomen and mediastinum for esophageal tumors relates to experience with squamous carcinomas. Our results demonstrate a different pattern of dissemination for junctional esophageal adenocarcinomas. The nodal stations to be resected in radical lymphadenectomies for such tumors should be redefined.     

Surgical treatment of the adenocarcinoma of the cardia

Adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction?should be classified into adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (Type I), true carcinoma of the cardia (Type II), and subcardial carcinoma (Type III) in a pathogenic and therapeutic point of view. During a 15-year period (1995 - 2009), 117 surgical laparotomies for adenocarcinoma of the cardia were performed in elective surgery in the First Clinic of General Surgery UHC "Mother Theresa" in Tirana. The classification was performed by summarizing the information obtained from oral contrast radiography, endoscopy, and intra-operative findings. There were 54 (46%) patients of Type I, 40 (34%) of Type II and 23 (20%) of Type III . Surgical procedures included "subtotal esophagectomy and proximal gastrectomy", "distal esophagectomy and proximal gastrectomy", "total gastrectomy and distal esophagectomy".?All anastomoses performed in the above mentioned procedures were hand sewn. Thirty-seven patients (32%) resulted inoperable at the time of laparotomy and 80 (68%) patients were treated with curative intent, those resulting in an operability index of 68%. The overall morbidity and mortality rates of 29% and 4,3% respectively.     

Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: influence of esophageal resection margin and operative approach on outcome

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the length of esophageal resection or the operative approach influences outcome for patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: While R0 resection remains the mainstay of curative treatment of patients with GEJ cancer, the optimal length of esophageal resection remains controversial. METHODS: Patients with Siewert I, II, or III adenocarcinoma who underwent complete gross resection without neoadjuvant therapy were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Proximal margin lengths were recorded ex vivo as the distance from the gross tumor edge to the esophageal transection line. Operative approaches were grouped into gastrectomy (limited esophagectomy) or esophagectomy (extended esophagectomy). RESULTS: From 1985 through 2003, 505 patients underwent R0/R1 gastrectomy (n = 153) or esophagectomy (n = 352) without neoadjuvant treatment. There were no differences in R1 resection rate, number of nodes examined or operative mortality between gastrectomy and esophagectomy. Univariate analysis found >3.8 cm to be the ex vivo proximal margin length (approximately 5 cm in situ) most predictive of improved survival. Multivariable analysis in patients who underwent R0 resection with >or=15 lymph nodes examined (n = 275) found the number of positive lymph nodes, T stage, tumor grade, and ex vivo proximal margin length >3.8 cm to be independent prognostic factors. Subset analysis found that the benefit associated with >3.8 cm margin was limited to patients with T2 or greater tumors and 相似文献   

食管胃结合部腺癌的外科治疗

食管胃结合部癌的发病率呈持续上升的趋势,尤其是在西方国家。外科手术切除仍然是治疗食管胃结合部癌的基石。由于肿瘤位于食管和胃的结合部,所以对其定义、分型、分期和手术方式都还存在一些争议。Siewert分型是目前认可程度最高的分型方法。对于进展期SiewertⅠ型食管胃结合部癌,其生物学特性和外科治疗方案更接近于食管癌;对于进展期SiewertⅡ、Ⅲ型食管胃结合部癌,外科治疗方案更接近于胃癌。而对于早期食管胃结合部癌,可以采用内镜切除或者缩小手术。     

Indicators of prognosis after transhiatal esophageal resection without thoracotomy for cancer

BACKGROUND: Various techniques have been described for the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The transhiatal approach has been debated for its safety and oncologic results. STUDY DESIGN: Between January 1993 and September 1996, 115 patients underwent a transhiatal esophagectomy with curative intent for adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the middle or distal esophagus or esophagogastric junction. Procedure-related hazards, pathologic results, and prognostic factors for survival were evaluated. Median duration of postoperative followup was 27 months (range 1 to 74 months) for all patients and 45 months (range 30 to 74 months) for those alive at final followup. RESULTS: No emergency thoracotomies were experienced. In-hospital mortality was 3.5%. Vocal cord dysfunction (24%) and pulmonary complications (23%) were the most frequent early postoperative complications. A microscopically radical resection was achieved in 73% of patients. Overall survival was 45% at 3 years. In univariate analysis, the most pronounced indicators of longterm survival (p < 0.0001) were radicality of the resection, lymph node involvement, lymph node ratio (ie, the ratio of invaded to removed lymph nodes), and pathologic tumor stage. Multivariate analysis identified the lymph node ratio (p < 0.0001) as the strongest independent predictor of long-term survival, followed by radicality of the resection (p = 0.0064) and duration of ICU stay (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy can be considered a safe procedure for resectable cancer of the midesophagus, distal esophagus, or esophagogastric junction. Radicality and survival results were in line with the data reported for traditional transthoracic approaches. A prognostic value of the lymph node ratio was observed. It emphasizes the need for controlled trials aimed at delineating the prognostic impact of an extended lymph node dissection.     

Surgical management of and long-term survival after adenocarcinoma of the cardia

BACKGROUND: The choice of surgical strategy for patients with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction is controversial. This study was performed to analyse the surgical results of a 20-year experience with these lesions. METHODS: From January 1981 to January 2001, 126 patients with adenocarcinoma of the cardia underwent resection in the authors' institution. The treatment of choice was oesophagectomy for type I tumours, and extended gastrectomy for type II and III lesions. Morbidity, mortality and survival were determined retrospectively. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (44.4 per cent) had type I tumours, 44 (34.9 per cent) type II and 26 (20.6 per cent) type III. Primary resection was performed in 113 patients (89.7 per cent). Oesophagectomy with resection of the proximal stomach was carried out in 65 patients (51.6 per cent) and extended total gastrectomy with transhiatal resection of the distal oesophagus in 61 (48.4 per cent). In-hospital mortality and morbidity rates were 4.8 and 34.1 per cent respectively. The overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 40.9 and 25.1 per cent respectively, and were not affected by the surgical approach. Survival was significantly associated with R0 resection, pathological node-positive category, postoperative complications and tumour differentiation. CONCLUSION: Postoperative mortality, morbidity and long-term survival did not appear to be affected by surgical approach. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the equivalence between transthoracic and transabdominal approaches.     

Diagnosis and treatment of non-metastatic esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: What are the current options?

While the prevalence of distal gastric cancer is decreasing in the western world, there has been an alarming rise in the incidence of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EGJA) during recent decades. Current reports show that the prognosis of EGJA remains poor. Therapy strategies are complex due to the anatomical location of the junction between the esophagus and stomach. Surgery, based on Siewert's classification and associated with regional lymphadenectomy, is the mainstay of treatment. Transthoracic esophagectomy is recommended for type I EGJA, while total gastrectomy is recommended for type III EGJA; both approaches can be considered for type II EGJA. Surgery alone can be indicated only for stage I and IIa tumors. Perioperative chemotherapy should be considered for stage IIb, III and non-metastatic stage IV tumors. Adjuvant chemoradiation can be proposed for tumors with high-risk of recurrence in the absence of neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation can be proposed for predominantly esophageal EGJA, and might well become a standard treatment for all EGJA tumors in the near future. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for optimal diagnosis and management.     

����ʳ��θ��ϲ��ٰ��Ĺ淶�ۺ�����

食管胃结合部腺癌(AEG)的发病率呈持续上升趋势,尤其是在西方国家,增长速度远远高于东方国家。对于SiewertI型AEG,其生物学特性和外科治疗方案更接近于食管癌;对于SiewertⅡ、Ⅲ型AEG,外科治疗方案更接近于胃癌。目前有两个大型的Ⅲ期临床试验比较了不同术式的效果:SiewertI型AEG建议采用经胸切除的手术;而SiewertⅡ、Ⅲ型肿瘤建议采用开腹经食管裂孔的术式。同时,围手术期化疗、化放疗的作用也在临床试验中得到了进一步证实。     

Adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia: what is the optimal surgical approach?

BACKGROUND: The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia is rising in Western countries. This study evaluates prognostic factors associated with surgical management of this cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Medical records of consecutive patients with gastric cardial cancer treated by surgical resection from 1991 through 2001 were reviewed. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated using log-rank test and Cox regression. Mean followup period was 34 months. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients met study inclusion criteria. Median patient age was 65 years (range 86 to 22). Fifty-nine (72%) patients had type II tumors and 23 (28%) patients had type III tumors, according to the Siewert classification for gastroesophageal junction tumors. Twenty-seven (33%) patients underwent total esophagectomy, 24 (29%) patients underwent extended gastrectomy with thoracotomy, and 31 (38%) patients underwent extended gastrectomy without thoracotomy. Overall postoperative 5-year survival rate was 30%. On multivariate analysis, patient age 65 years and older, absence of lymph node metastasis, and R0 resection emerged as factors independently associated with improved postoperative survival. Frequency with which proximal resection margin was infiltrated with cancer was a function of gross margin length and T stage. Proximal gross margin length of at least 6 cm was required to achieve a microscopically negative proximal margin for T3 and T4 cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving R0 resection should be the goal of surgical therapy for the gastric cardial cancer. The surgical approach should be tailored to individual patients to achieve this goal.     

Management of an esophagogastric fibromatosis in a child: a case report

Intraabdominal fibromatosis is an uncommon neoplasm. The aggressive nature of these tumors and the potential for major morbidity secondary to resection can present a difficult surgical dilemma. A 9-year-old boy presented with anemia and vomiting. He had esophagogastric fibromatosis diagnosed and underwent distal esophagectomy, total gastrectomy, Hunt-Lawrence jejunal pouch, and Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy. This report describes the successful surgical management of an esophagogastric fibromatosis for the first time in the English-language literature. The management of this tumor is discussed with particular regard to the very unusual clinical presentation.     

Limited resection for early esophageal cancer?

BACKGROUND: Early squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and early adenocarcinoma (AC) of the esophagus are potentially curable diseases. The crucial point in treatment is that the depth of tumor infiltration into the mucosal and submucosal layers is correlated with the rate of nodal metastases and therefore with long-term prognosis. METHODS AND FOCUS: In submucosal SCC with a high rate of nodal metastases curative resection can be achieved only by radical esophagectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy, which remains the treatment of choice for this tumor entity. In submucosal AC the Merendino procedure may offer an alternative since lymphatic invasion occurs at a later stage than in SCC, and locoregional lymph nodes can be adequately resected. Major advantages of this operation over radical esophagectomy include the complete resection of the entire Barrett segment and the lower postoperative morbidity and mortality. Vagal-sparing esophagectomy still lacks adequate oncological evaluation for it to be recommended except in stage I a tumors. For mucosal SCC and AC endoscopic mucosal resection is the treatment of choice but requires intensive follow-up since the rate of complete resections is lower than in limited and radical surgical procedures. On the other hand, a low postoperative morbidity and the functional integrity of the tubular esophagus support the use of endoscopic mucosal resection for mucosal cancer.     

ʳ��-θ��ϲ��ٰ�������������������

??Controversy and evaluation of the radical resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction SUN Yi-hong, SHEN Zhen-bin. Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
Corresponding author: SUN Yi-hong, E-mail: sun. yihong@zs-hospital. sh.cn
Abstract The majority of scholars have agreed that the adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is an independent tumor entity, which is different from squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric adenocarcinoma. But there are still many controversies about the surgical approaches, procedures of resection, and extent of lymph nodes dissection. Clinically, surgical procedure should be tailored individually according to the general condition of the patient, type of AEG, extent of esophageal infiltration, cTNM stage and experiences of the surgeons to get a good balance between the surgical safety and degree of radical resection.