Inhaled budesonide in acute asthma

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of aerosolized budesonide therapy (with metered dose inhaler and spacer) early in the emergency room treatment of acute moderate exacerbations of bronchial asthma in children. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Paediatric Emergency Service of an urban teaching hospital and a tertiary case referral centre. STUDY POPULATION: Sixty children between 3 and 12 years of age with an acute moderate exacerbation of asthma. INTERVENTION: All patients received humidified oxygen (5-8 L/min by Venturi(R) mask; Hudson Respiratory Care, Temecula, CA, USA), nebulized salbutamol (0.15 mg/kg in 3 mL saline) and were randomized to receive either budesonide (400 microg) or placebo inhalation (MDI and spacer) at half hourly intervals for three doses. If there was an inadequate response or no response to treatment at the end of 2 h, oxygen and salbutamol therapy were continued and the patient was given one of dose intravenous hydrocortisone and was started on an aminophylline infusion. If there was no response at the end of a further 4 h, the patient was hospitalized. INITIAL EVALUATION AND MONITORING: Colour, respiratory rate (RR), heart rate, accessory muscle usage, chest retraction, wheeze, oxygen saturation (by pulse oximetery) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was recorded at admission and thereafter at hourly intervals for 3 h or until till the child recovered. The need for oxygen therapy after 2 h and need for hospitalization were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: Both groups showed a significant improvement in respiratory status at the end of 2 h. However, children in the intervention group showed greater improvements in RR and PEFR (P < 0. 05) and respiratory distress score (P < 0.1). A significantly lower proportion of the intervention group patients required oxygen therapy for more than 2 h (23% vs 50%; P < 0.05) and aminophylline infusion and systemic corticosteroid therapy (7% vs 27%; P < 0.05). None of the children in the budesonide group, in contrast to 23% of those in the placebo group, required hospitalization (P < 0.05). The length of hospital stay (i.e. time taken to recover from acute asthma) was significantly shorter in the intervention group (3.2 +/- 2.5 h) than in the placebo group (7.8 +/- 11.3 h; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Aerosolized budesonide therapy (with MDI and spacer) together with nebulized salbutamol early in the emergency room treatment of acute moderate exacerbations of asthma helped in early recovery and decreased the need for hospitalization. It may be worthwhile calculating this regimen for home-based early treatment of acute exacerbations.     

Co-administration of salbutamol and fluticasone for emergency treatment of children with moderate acute asthma.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of nebulized therapy with salbutamol alone or in combination with fluticasone. In a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 150 children with moderate acute asthma were randomly assigned to receive by nebulizations either (i) three doses of salbutamol 30 microl/kg per dose, each dose administered every 15 min, (ii) three doses of salbutamol plus two doses of fluticasone 500 microg/dose at 15 and 30 min after first dose of salbutamol, or (iii) three doses of salbutamol/fluticasone 500 microg/dose, each combined dose administered every 15 min. Pulse oxymetry (SaO2), peak expiratory flow (PEF) and Wood et al. (Am J Dis Child, 123, 1972, 123) clinical scale were evaluated at baseline, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after the first nebulization. Patients in the three groups significantly improved since 15 min after the first nebulization. We did not observe differences in the recovery of SaO2 and PEF among the three groups of treatment (p > 0.10). In group 3, children showed better clinical response at 120 min than the other two groups (p < 0.05). No significant adverse effects were observed with any treatment. To summarize, in children with acute moderate asthma, nebulized salbutamol at an accumulated dose of 90 mul/kg plus fluticasone at an accumulated dose of 1500 microg produced better clinical relief after 2 h. However, similar PEF and SaO2 responses were observed with salbutamol alone or in combination with different doses of fluticasone.     

Treatment of asthma crises in children with nebulized salbutamol

Thirty-two children were treated with nebulized salbutamol for acute asthma. Seventy-five per cent of the treatments were efficient, either after a first nebulization at 0.15 mg/kg (47% = group I), or after a second nebulization 45 min later, at 0.05 mg/kg (27% = group II). Twenty-five per cent of the treatments (group III) were inefficient or only partly efficient. The clinical tolerance was good except in two children. Group I and II presented differences only for the auscultation score. Children from group I and II were older and had less severe asthma than those from group III. On the basis of this study, nebulized salbutamol appears to be an affective and safe treatment for acute asthma. The repeated administration of low doses, shortly after the first nebulization increases the quality of the response.     

Nebulized salbutamol vs salbutamol and ipratropium combination in asthma

Objective : To see the additional benefit of combined frequent nebulization with salbutamol and ipratropium bromide in acute attack of asthma with moderate severity.Methods : Fifty asthmatic children in the age range of 6–14 years were divided into two equal groups. Group I children were nebulized with three doses of Salbutamol alone (0.03 ml/kg/dose) and Group II children were given combined nebulization of Salbutamol (dose as in group I) and Ipratropium bromide (250 Μgm/dose for three doses) at 20 minutes interval. Children were observed at 15, 30, 60,120,180 and 240 minutes interval.Results : A significant improvement in % of PEFR starting at 30 minutes and lasting the entire study period of 4 hours was noted in both the groups. However on analysis of varience the results were better in group II.Conclusion : Frequent combined nebulization with Salbutamol and Ipratropium bromide is beneficial in acute asthma of moderate severity.     

A 3-day course of 1 mg/kg versus 2 mg/kg bodyweight prednisolone for 1- to 5-year-old children with acute moderate exacerbation of asthma: a randomized double-blind noninferiority trial

BackgroundEven though the guidelines on the management of preschool asthma recommend early use of corticosteroids for acute moderate-to-severe exacerbations, considerable variation exists with regard to type and dose of steroids.ObjectivesTo compare the clinical outcomes and side effect profile between 1 mg/kg/day and 2 mg/kg/day of oral prednisolone when administered for 3 days in preschool children with acute moderate asthma exacerbations.Study Design and SettingRandomized double-blind noninferiority trial was done in the paediatric emergency of a teaching hospital.Patients, Interventions, and OutcomesA total of 128 children aged 1 to 5 years who presented to the paediatric emergency with acute moderate exacerbation of asthma were enrolled. They were randomized into two groups. One group received 1 mg/kg/day and the other 2 mg/kg/day of oral prednisolone for 3 days. Severity of asthma exacerbation was measured by Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score. The PRAM scores, wheeze recurrence, and side effect profile were compared and analyzed between the two groups.ResultsThe difference in the PRAM scores at 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours after intervention between the two groups was statistically insignificant. Need for escalation of therapy, salbutamol nebulization, time for resolution of symptoms, and recurrence of wheeze were similar between the two groups. Vomiting was significantly less frequent in low-dose group with a relative risk of 0.19 to 0.99 compared to high-dose prednisolone.ConclusionPrednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day was not inferior to 2 mg/kg/day in terms of clinical improvement and recurrence of wheeze within 1 week and has less frequent vomiting compared to higher dose.     

The effect of nebulized budesonide treatment in children with mild to moderate exacerbations of asthma

Background: The role of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of acute asthma remains a controversial subject. Objective and methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group clinical trial on the effect of a 5-d course of nebulized budesonide treatment in children with mild to moderate exacerbation of asthma was performed. The need for systemic corticosteroid intervention was evaluated as the primary outcome measure. Results: Sixty-seven children aged 6 to 15 y were enrolled. During the emergency department phase, they received three nebulizations of either budesonide(1 mg/dose) or placebo, and then in the home phase of the study, they continued their study medications twice a day for another 4 d. Though the level of improvement in the emergency department phase was similar between the groups given either budesonide or placebo treatments (6.8±1.9% vs 4.0±1.5%, p=0.30, respectively), nebulized budesonide caused a trend towards a benefit in terms of the need for systemic corticosteroid intervention (2/33 vs 7/34, p=0.07), but not in secondary outcome measures.

Conclusion: Though we show a tendency towards a benefit with nebulized budesonide in children with mild to moderate exacerbations in terms of prevention of progression of the illness, the documented benefit is small and includes, at least, consideration for clinical significance, cost-effectiveness, impracticality and safety.     

Nebulized budesonide versus oral steroid in severe exacerbations of childhood asthma

The aim of this study was to assess whether nebulized budesonide may substitute for oral prednisolone in the management of children whose asthma is severe enough to warrant hospital admission, but who have no life threatening features. In a prospective, double-blind, randomized study nebulized budesonide (2 mg 8 hourly) was compared with oral prednisolone (2 mg/kg at entry and again at 24 h) in 46 children admitted to hospital with severe asthma exacerbations. Efficacy variables (including lung function measurements such as the primary outcome variable, Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV₁) and symptoms) were measured 24 h after treatment initiation. FEV₁ improved significantly compared to baseline in patients who received nebulized budesonide compared to the prednislone group. The data show nebulized budesonide to be at least as effective as oral steroid in improving lung function and symptom severity in severe exacerbations of childhood asthma.     

Ipratropium bromide plus nebulized albuterol for the treatment of hospitalized children with acute asthma

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of repeated doses of nebulized ipratropium bromide (IB) to a standardized inpatient asthma care algorithm (ACA) for children with status asthmaticus improves clinical outcome.STUDY DESIGN: Children with acute asthma (N = 210) age 1 to 18 years admitted to the ACA were assigned to the intervention or placebo group in randomized double-blind fashion. Both groups received nebulized albuterol, systemic corticosteroids, and oxygen according to the ACA. The intervention group received 250 microg IB combined with 2.5 mg albuterol by jet nebulization in a dosing schedule determined by the ACA phase. The placebo group received isotonic saline solution substituted for IB. Progression through each ACA phase occurred based on assessments of oxygenation, air exchange, wheezing, accessory muscle use, and respiratory rate performed at prescribed intervals. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between treatment groups in hospital length of stay (P =.46), asthma carepath progression (P =.37), requirement for additional therapy, or adverse effects. Children >6 years (N = 70) treated with IB had shorter mean hospital length of stay (P =.03) and more rapid mean asthma carepath progression (P =.02) than children in the placebo group. However, after adjustment was done for baseline group differences, the observed benefit of IB therapy in older children no longer reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The routine addition of repeated doses of nebulized IB to a standardized regimen of systemic corticosteroids and frequently administered beta-2 agonists confers no significant enhancement of clinical outcome for the treatment of hospitalized children with status asthmaticus.     

Controlled trial of nebulized albuterol in children younger than 2 years of age with acute asthma.

To determine the response to nebulized beta 2 agonist, 28 children younger than 2 years of age who visited the emergency department during an episode of acute asthma were studied. Each subject had a previous history of recurrent wheezing episodes. They were randomly assigned to receive two administrations of either nebulized albuterol (0.15 mg/kg per dose) or placebo (normal saline) with oxygen, 1 hour apart. After two nebulizations, the albuterol-treated patients had a greater improvement in clinical status (respiratory rate, degree of wheezing and accessory muscle use, total clinical score, and arterial oxygen saturation) than the placebo group. None of the patients in the albuterol group experienced a decrease of arterial oxygen saturation of greater than or equal to 2%. It is concluded that a trial of nebulized beta 2 agonists is warranted in the treatment of acute asthma in infants and young children.     

Additive effects of dexamethasone in nebulized salbutamol or l-epinephrine treated infants with acute bronchiolitis

BACKGROUND: Although it is the most common lower respiratory infection of infancy, the optimal treatment for acute bronchiolitis is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the early and late effects of nebulized L-epinephrine (EPI) and intramuscular dexamethasone (DEX) combination therapy with nebulized salbutamol (SAL) and dexamethasone combination and bronchodilators alone in outpatients with acute bronchiolitis. METHODS: A total of 69 infants aged 2-21 months who were admitted to the Pediatrics Department of the Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, with acute bronchiolitis were included in a randomized, placebo-controlled, prospective trial study. Patients were assigned to receive either nebulized L-epinephrine (3 mg) or salbutamol (0.15 mg/kg) and 15 min later, either dexamethasone 0.6 mg/kg or placebo (PLA), intramuscularly, in a double-blind randomized fashion. The study groups were: epinephrine + dexamethasone group (group 1, n=23), salbutamol + dexamethasone group (group 2, n=23), epinephrine + placebo group (group 3, n=11), and salbutamol + placebo group (group 4, n=12). The outcome measures were heart rate, respiratory rate and Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument (RDAI) score determined at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min, 24 h, and 5 days after the first therapy. Patients were then followed-up during the subsequent 2 months for the prevalance of respiratory complaints regarding bronchial hyperreactivity. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the outcome variables of the four groups within the first 120 min and at 24 hours, or between the rates of requirement of a second dose of the same bronchodilator. However, fifth day RDAI score values of both DEX groups were significantly lower than that of SAL + PLA group (P=0.000 and P=0.01, respectively). The fifth day score value of group 1 was also significantly better than that value of EPI + PLA group but not different from group 2. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of intramuscular dexamethasone added to nebulized L-epinephrine, or salbutamol therapies resulted in better outcome measures than bronchodilators alone in the late phase (fifth day) of mild to moderate degree bronchiolitis attack. However, effects of EPI + DEX combination was not different from SAL + DEX combination.     

Prednisolone and salbutamol in the hospital treatment of acute asthma.

The use of oral prednisolone (2 mg/kg) to treat children admitted to hospital with acute asthma was assessed in a placebo controlled study. Children were further randomised to receive either 0.15 mg/kg salbutamol every 30 minutes for the first three hours of admission, or 5 mg salbutamol every one to four hours as needed. Treatment was double blind and the assessor was unaware of the nebuliser regimen given. Children were examined before and after treatment with salbutamol on arrival and reassessed four hours after admission. Seventy children completed the study. Seventeen (46%) of 37 children receiving prednisolone and six (9%) of 33 receiving placebo were fit for discharge after four hours of treatment. There was no significant difference between the two nebuliser regimens. Clinical parameters indicative of asthma severity were improved in all groups. Between group comparisons at reassessment showed higher peak flows in those receiving prednisolone and nebulisers every 30 minutes but differences were not significant for other parameters. Objective parameters indicating steroid efficacy over placebo were minimal. Despite this, those receiving prednisolone were more readily identifiable as being fit for discharge within four hours of treatment.     

Prednisolone and salbutamol in the hospital treatment of acute asthma

The use of oral prednisolone (2 mg/kg) to treat children admitted to hospital with acute asthma was assessed in a placebo controlled study. Children were further randomised to receive either 0.15 mg/kg salbutamol every 30 minutes for the first three hours of admission, or 5 mg salbutamol every one to four hours as needed. Treatment was double blind and the assessor was unaware of the nebuliser regimen given. Children were examined before and after treatment with salbutamol on arrival and reassessed four hours after admission. Seventy children completed the study. Seventeen (46%) of 37 children receiving prednisolone and six (9%) of 33 receiving placebo were fit for discharge after four hours of treatment. There was no significant difference between the two nebuliser regimens. Clinical parameters indicative of asthma severity were improved in all groups. Between group comparisons at reassessment showed higher peak flows in those receiving prednisolone and nebulisers every 30 minutes but differences were not significant for other parameters. Objective parameters indicating steroid efficacy over placebo were minimal. Despite this, those receiving prednisolone were more readily identifiable as being fit for discharge within four hours of treatment.     

Costs and effectiveness of spacer versus nebulizer in young children with moderate and severe acute asthma

OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs and effectiveness of albuterol by metered dose inhaler (MDI) and spacer versus nebulizer in young children with moderate and severe acute asthma. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in an emergency department at a children's hospital. The participants were children 1 to 4 years of age with moderate to severe acute asthma. Patients assigned to the spacer group received albuterol (600 microg) by MDI by spacer (AeroChamber) followed by placebo by nebulizer (n = 30). The nebulizer group received placebo MDI by spacer followed by 2.5 mg albuterol by nebulizer (n = 30). Treatments were repeated at 20-minute intervals until the patient was judged to need no further doses of bronchodilator, or a total of 6 treatments. RESULTS: Clinical score, heart rate, respiratory rate, auscultatory findings, and oxygen saturation were recorded at baseline, after each treatment, and 60 minutes after the last treatment. Baseline characteristics and asthma severity were similar for the treatment groups. The spacer was as effective as the nebulizer for clinical score, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation but produced a greater reduction in wheezing (P =.03). Heart rate increased to a greater degree in the nebulizer group (11.0/min vs 0.17/min for spacer, P <.01). Fewer children in the spacer group required admission (33% vs 60% in the nebulizer group, P =.04, adjusted for sex). No differences were seen in rates of tremor or hyperactivity. The mean cost of each emergency department presentation was NZ$825 for the spacer group and NZ$1282 for the nebulizer group (P =.03); 86% of children and 85% of parents preferred the spacer. CONCLUSION: The MDI and spacer combination was a cost-effective alternative to a nebulizer in the delivery of albuterol to young children with moderate and severe acute asthma.     

Hypokalaemia following nebulized salbutamol in children with acute attack of bronchial asthma

Objective : To determine whether use of nebulized salbutamol therapy for treatment of an acute attack of asthma in children is associated with hypokalaemia and if so what is its frequency, severity and effect on recovery.
Methodology : Forty-six children, aged 10 months to 12 years (mean 7.9±1.5 years) with acute attack of bronchial asthma, treated initially with three doses of nebulized salbutamol 0.15-0.3mg/kg, every 30 min participated in the study. Blood for serum potassium was obtained at the beginning and after three doses of nebulized salbutamol therapy, before administering other drugs.
Results : The mean±SD serum potassium level decreased marginally from 3.9±0.5mEq/L to 3.7±0.5mEq/L ( P <0.05). A decrease in serum potassium concentration was noted in 26 (56.5%) and hypokalaemia (serum potassium <3.5 mg/L) in 17 (39%) patients. It was more frequent in patients who had received oral salbutamol for the preceding 7 days. The average time taken for recovery was longer in patients who had hypokalaemia than those who had normal serum potassium concentration (8.6±2.7 h vs 6.5±2.7 h; P <0.005).
Conclusions : Hypokalaemia may occur in about one-third of patients treated with three doses of nebulized salbutamol therapy, especially those on prior oral salbutamol therapy. The monitoring of serum potassium concentration may be warranted in such patients.     

Treatment of recurrent acute wheezing episodes in infancy with oral salbutamol and prednisolone

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of oral salbutamol and prednisolone in the treatment of acute episodes of wheezing in infants under 15 months of age. Sixty-two acute episodes of wheezing were studied in 59 babies (age range 3–14 months; mean 7 months), who had all suffered at least one previous wheezy episode. Patients were randomised to receive either salbutamol and prednisolone, salbutamol and placebo or double placebo. Parents were requested to keep a diary card record of twice daily scoring of their baby's symptoms over the next 14 days. A significantly greater number of treatment failures occurred in the placebo group compared to babies treated with oral salbutamol (relative risk 2.51; 95% confidence intervals for relative risk 1.09–5.79). There was no difference in the number of treatment failures between babies treated with a combination of salbutamol and placebo and those treated with salbutamol and prednisolone (relative risk 0.71; 95% confidence intervals for relative risk 0.18–2.80).Conclusion This study demonstrates that oral salbutamol is beneficial in the treatment of acute episodes of wheezing in infancy. A combination of oral salbutamol and oral prednisolone appeared to have no additional benefit over treatment with oral salbutamol alone.     

Oral prednisolone in the acute management of children age 6 to 35 months with viral respiratory infection-induced lower airway disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of oral prednisolone in virally induced respiratory distress.Study design Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 230 children age 6 to 35 months in the emergency department. Each patient received either oral prednisolone (2 mg/kg/d) or placebo for 3 days. RESULTS: The hospitalization rates were similar between the two groups. For admitted children (n=123), the median length of stay was 1 day shorter in the prednisolone group (2 vs 3 days, P=.060). The proportion of children requiring >or=3 days of hospitalization was 47.5% in the prednisolone group and 67.7% in the placebo group (P=.023). There was less need for additional asthma medication (18.0% vs 37.1%, P=.018) in the prednisolone group. The median duration of symptoms of respiratory distress was 1 day in the prednisolone group versus 2 days in the placebo group both among the hospitalized (P<.001) and nonhospitalized children (P=.006). CONCLUSION: A 3-day course of oral prednisolone effectively reduced disease severity, length of hospital stay, and the duration of symptoms among children 6 to 35 months old with virally induced respiratory distress.     

喘乐宁空气压缩雾化治疗婴儿毛细支气管炎疗效判定

目的　应用 β2 受体激动剂治疗的急性毛细支气管炎效果一直有争议。该研究观察毛细支气管炎患儿喘乐宁雾化吸入治疗前后肺功能的变化 ,并探讨其临床意义。方法　 30例急性毛细支气管炎患儿随机分为治疗组 1 6例 (喘乐宁雾化吸入 )和对照组 1 4例 (生理盐水雾化吸入 ) ,在雾化吸入前、吸入后即刻、1 5min和 30min分别测定潮气呼吸流速容量环 (TBFV)、呼吸系统静态顺应性及阻力的变化。结果　治疗组到达潮气呼气峰流速时呼出气量 /潮气量 (%V PF)在吸入后 30min与吸入前比较 ,差异有显著性 (P <0 .0 5 )。两组雾化后即刻 2 5 /PF、吸气时间 (Ti)差异有显著性 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论　喘乐宁雾化吸入后 30min可明显降低小气道阻力 ,改善通气。     

Placebo controlled trial of systemic corticosteroids in acute childhood asthma

In a randomised controlled trial 38 asthmatic children aged 2-11 yr who had not received regular oral or inhaled steroids during the previous year, were treated with a standard regime of nebulised salbutamol and intravenous aminophylline plus either hydrocortisone and oral prednisolone for 5 days, or placebo. The children were observed throughout their hospital stay and for 3 months afterwards. There was a greater fall in heart rates in the steroid treated group on the second day of treatment (mean diff. 16 beats/min) and at discharge (mean diff. 13 beats/min); p less than 0.025. Peak Expiratory Flow Rates recorded in 26 children, 13 in each group, showed more improvement on day 2 in those given steroids (mean diff 16% predicted); p less than 0.05. This difference was not apparent at discharge but 9 children treated with steroids were clinically wheeze-free when they left hospital compared with 3 in the placebo group, p less than 0.05. There were no differences in respiratory rate, pulsus paradoxus and arterial oxygen saturation. Trends in duration of hospital stay and relapse rate during the succeeding 3 months favoured active treatment. These findings support the use of systemic corticosteroids in addition to high dose bronchodilators to treat 'non steroid dependent' children hospitalised with acute severe asthma.     

Randomized trial of salbutamol in acute bronchiolitis

To test whether nebulized salbutamol (albuterol) is safe and efficacious for the treatment of young children with acute bronchiolitis, we enrolled 83 children (median age 6 months, range 1 to 21 months) in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Participants received two treatments at 30-minute intervals of either nebulized salbutamol (0.10 mg/kg in 2 ml 0.9% saline solution) or a similar volume of 0.9% saline solution placebo. Outcome measures were the respiratory rate, pulse oximetry, and a clinical score based on the degree of wheezing and retractions. Patients in the salbutamol arm had significantly greater improvement in clinical scores after the initial treatment (p = 0.04). There was no difference between the groups in oxygen saturation (p = 0.74); patients treated with salbutamol had a small increase in heart rate after two treatments (159 +/- 16 vs 151 +/- 16; p = 0.03). We conclude that salbutamol is safe and effective for the initial treatment of young children with acute bronchiolitis.     

Prednisolone versus dexamethasone in croup: a randomised equivalence trial.

BACKGROUND: Croup remains a common respiratory problem presenting to emergency departments. A single oral treatment of oral dexamethasone results in improved outcome. Prednisolone has similar pharmacokinetic properties and has a significant advantage in that it is commercially available in liquid preparations. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether a single oral dose of prednisolone was equivalent to a single oral dose of dexamethasone (matched for potency) in children with mild to moderate croup. DESIGN: A double blind, randomised, controlled equivalence trial. SETTING: Tertiary paediatric emergency department. Patients: 133 children aged 3 to 142 months presenting with mild to moderate croup. INTERVENTIONS: Children received either a single oral dose of dexamethasone 0.15 mg/kg or single oral dose of prednisolone 1 mg/kg. Outcome: The main outcome measure was unscheduled re-presentation to medical care as determined by telephone follow up at 7 to 10 days. Croup score, adrenaline (epinephrine) use, time spent in the emergency department, and duration of croup and viral symptoms were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Children treated with prednisolone were more likely to re-present: 19 of 65 children (29%) reattended medical care compared with 5 of 68 (7%) from the dexamethasone group. The confidence intervals around this 22% difference in outcome were 8% to 35%, outside the 0% to 7.5% range of equivalence. There were no significant differences in other outcome measures. CONCLUSION: A single oral dose of prednisolone is less effective than a single oral dose of dexamethasone in reducing unscheduled re-presentation to medical care in children with mild to moderate croup.