开展消除麻风运动后对当地新发现病人状况的影响

目的：分析开展消除麻风运动后对当地新发现麻风病人状况的影响。方法：通过比较麻风高流行县（市）开展消除麻风运动前、中和后一年的麻风新发现病人资料，分析新发现麻风病人各个方面情况。结果：发现所有8个县（市）在开展消除麻风运动当年发现病人数均为最高。在开展消除麻风运动后一年，防治力量强的县（市）发现病人数维持在开展消除麻风运动前一年的水平，防治力量弱的县（市）发现病人数则比开展运动前一年有减少。在开展消除运动期间发现的病人居住地离县麻风专业机构的距离最远，平均为62．8公里／人。开展消除运动期间疾病延迟期为最长，平均为42．9月，消除运动后一年发现的病人疾病平均延迟期缩短至26．5月。结论：开展消除麻风运动后在短期内不会对当地的新发现病人数产生很大的影响，但其促进了部分麻风流行病学指标好转，从而促进了当地麻风防治。     

重复开展消除麻风运动对当地新发现病人情况的影响

目的:观察贵州省兴义市重复开展消除麻风运动对当地新发现麻风病人的影响.方法:收集1996～2004年新发现麻风病人的有关资料进行比较分析.结果:9年共发现麻风病人166例,平均每年发现18.4例,年均发现率为2.65/10万.1999年首次开展消除麻风运动后3年,新病人中的2级畸残率和延迟期呈明显下降趋势,低于开展前3年的水平.两次开展消除麻风运动时的畸残率和平均延迟期均达较高水平,提示该地区虽两次开展消除麻风运动但麻风流行程度仍处于较高水平.结论:重复实施消除麻风运动可促进某些流行病学指标的好转,应反复多次开展.     

Prediction of elimination of leprosy in leprosy endemic areas of China.

A study was carried out based upon the data from the National System for Leprosy Surveillance and using appropriate mathematical models. The results showed that of 337 counties where the national goal of basic eradication of leprosy had not been reached and in 40 counties where the WHO goal of leprosy elimination had not been achieved in 1996, the detection rates in calendar years followed exponential models with significant goodness-of-fit. In the 67 counties with downward trends of detection rates, the national goal can be met in terms of detection rate in 6% of counties before the year 2000 or 34.4% before the year 2010, or, in terms of prevalence rate in 31.3% before the year 2010. In the 11 counties with downward trends of the detection rates, the WHO target can be met in eight to ten counties within this century when the duration of disease was determined with the WHO definition. If the MB proportion among new cases increased by 10%, the target would be met one year later. However, at the same MB proportion, the change of fixed treatment schedules from PB six months and MB two years to PB nine months and MB three years will cause achievement of the goal to be postponed by two to ten years.     

Trends in leprosy case detection worldwide since 1985

Trends in case detection and case detection rate (CDR) since 1985 are described at regional and national levels. Annual case detection by WHO Region was available for 1994-2000. Using different sources, complete time series for case detection were constructed for 1985-1998 for a group of 33 endemic countries cumulatively (top 33), and for 14 individual countries (top 14). Population statistics were used to derive CDRs. India contributed 79% to global case detection in 1998. Africa, the Americas and South-East Asia each contributed about 30% when India is excluded. During 1994-2000, case detection did not decrease in these three WHO Regions. The 33 countries contributed 99% and 98% to global case detection in 1994 and 1998, respectively. Cumulative case detection for the top 33 minus India gradually increased, overall almost doubling. The contribution of the top 14 to case detection of the top 33 hardly changed over time, equalling 96% in 1998 (81% when India is excluded). In terms of annual case detection, Brazil was always ranked second after India; it accounted for 27% of 1998 case detection in the top 33 except India. In 1998, seven of the top 14 countries--including India and Brazil--had CDRs above 2 per 10,000. The CDR did not exceed 1 per 10,000 for the other half. Decreasing tendencies in CDR, either for the whole period or in the 1990s, are observed for four of the top 14 countries (Guinea and three Western Pacific countries: China, Vietnam and the Philippines). In conclusion, there is no general decline in case detection to date, and several important countries still have high CDRs. Prevalence is an irrelevant indicator for monitoring epidemiological changes in leprosy. Trends in the transmission and incidence of leprosy are still completely unclear, necessitating further research. The target to eliminate leprosy as a public health problem, defined as a prevalence of less than 1 per 10,000, is therefore also an inadequate yardstick for decision making on leprosy control.     

Analysis on the detection of new leprosy cases before, during and after the year of leprosy elimination campaigns

To analyse the impact on of case finding of leprosy elimination campaigns (LECs), data on newly detected leprosy cases in a leprosy endemic area were collected before, during and after the year of LEC. The number of new leprosy cases detected during the year of LEC was significantly higher than previously. The number of newly detected cases after the year of LEC was similar to that of detected before the year of LEC in counties with persisting case finding activities. However, the number of newly detected cases after the year of LEC significantly decreased in counties without active case finding activities. The average distance from the homes of leprosy cases detected during LEC to the leprosy control unit at the count town was 62.8 km, which is farther than that of other leprosy cases detected before and after the year of LEC. The average time from disease onset to diagnosis of leprosy cases detected after the year of LEC shortened. The results also showed that carrying out LECs is unlikely to have a significant impact on the trend of case finding within a short time in local areas, but it may improve some indicators of leprosy patients and so promote leprosy control in local areas.     

Leprosy elimination campaigns in Orissa

Four Modified Leprosy Elimination Campaigns (MLECs) were conducted in Orissa by March 2003. Their impact on various leprosy indicators was analyzed. More than 70% of the people of the State were examined during these campaigns. The suspect rate decreased from 1.44% to 0.37% towards the fourth MLEC. About 15% of the suspects were clinically confirmed to be having leprosy. The total number of new cases detected during the MLEC years was on the decrease. A marked fall in new case-detection rate was observed during inter-MLEC years. This has resulted in fluctuation in the prevalence rate during the MLEC years, but the overall PR/10,000 population decreased from 12.18 in 1996-97 to 7.3 in March 2003. More than 40% of the total new cases and about 45% of total new child cases for the corresponding year were detected during the MLECs, and the proportion of total new case-detection was as high as 60.8% during the first MLEC. The proportion of female cases detected during succeeding MLECs improved and an almost equal number of female cases were detected during MLECs III and IV. Considering the present leprosy situation in Orissa and the effectiveness of MLECs in case-detection, it was recommended that such campaigns should be undertaken in select high prevalent blocks of the State at regular intervals, along with the strengthening of the integration of NLEP activities into primary health care activities.     

Guidelines for carrying out leprosy elimination campaigns 1996. WHO, Action Programme for the Elimination of Leprosy

A Leprosy Elimination Campaign (LEC) is an initiative which aims to detect leprosy cases, particularly the more serious ones referred to as 'cases of consequence', that remain undetected in the community, and to treat them with MDT. This will subsequently reduce the delay in managing such cases in the community and ensure that the existing health services are able to treat them. It is a time-bound, one-time activity. Leprosy of consequence is defined as cases with more than five skin lesions and skin smear positive cases. Such cases are regarded as being of consequence because they act as a major source of infection in the community and are either already disabled or at high risk of becoming disabled. LEC is a focused combination of activities which includes: orientation courses for local health workers and volunteers; community awareness creation activities; case-finding and treating every detected case immediately with MDT. These campaigns are to be carried out primarily in endemic regions where the prevalence and new case detections are high and where the gap between estimated and registered cases is large. It is a national activity, implemented by the national staff with technical cooperation from WHO and other agencies.     

Transepidermal elimination of Mycobacterium leprae in histoid leprosy: a case report suggesting possible participation of skin in leprosy transmission

An Indian patient of histoid leprosy presenting de novo, having numerous solid staining bacilli inside the intact epidermis and eliminating bacilli from the intact and the eroded epidermis, is reported. The diagnosis, suggested by the clinical features, was confirmed histopathologically. This unusual report indicates possible participation of skin in leprosy transmission.     

Modified leprosy elimination campaign (MLEC) for case detection in a remote tribal area in the State of Orissa, India

A leprosy project was established in a difficult to reach area under guidelines of Government of India. The leprosy services were provided by Koraput Leprosy Eradication Project (KORALEP) and general health services by Primary Health Care (PHC). Leprosy elimination campaigns (LECs) were suggested by WHO to detect more cases in the community. A modified leprosy elimination campaign (MLEC), carried out utilizing the services of primary health care workers is discussed in this paper. Apart from the trained health workers, Anganwadi workers along with some literate people from the district were also included in the search teams. In all, 1543 cases were shortlisted from the suspects identified and on re-examination 576 cases were confirmed as active cases. Sixty percent of the cases detected were very early cases with two to three skin lesions. This could be achieved with a very brief training of health workers and involving village voluntary workers. MLEC was found to be a useful tool for case finding in such areas.     

Progress towards elimination of leprosy as a public health problem in India and role of modified leprosy elimination campaign

India (population 943 million) has seen a highly significant decrease in the prevalence of leprosy since the introduction of multi-drug therapy (MDT) in 1981. From a prevalence rate of 57/10,000 of the population in March 1981, the figure has declined to 5.2/10,000 in March 1999. This was possible due to the creation of a completely vertical (specialized) infrastructure for leprosy control in the 218 endemic districts of the country and skeleton vertical staff in the remaining districts, coupled with the recruitment of additional staff on contract basis to provide MDT through vertical staff in endemic districts and mobile treatment units in the moderate and low endemic districts. Despite all efforts, however, new case detection has not shown a decline over the last 14 years due to the presence of hidden (and undiagnosed) cases. Therefore, in order to intensify and hasten progress towards elimination (less than 1 case per 10,000 of the population) in the whole country, it was decided to implement a massive leprosy elimination campaign (LEC) in all the States/Union Territories (UTs). The reports of 22 States/UTs indicate that 415 out of the total of 490 districts in the country were covered by modified LEC (MLEC), with 85% coverage of the population. The campaign used in India was modified from the pattern previously described by the World Health Organization. The detection of hidden or suspected cases took place within a short, intensive period of 6-7 days and relied heavily on house-to-house searches by General Health Care staff trained in leprosy detection and confirmation was made by appropriately trained staff. This MLEC received widespread Government and public support, resulting in the detection of 454,290 hidden cases of leprosy, whilst providing training to a large number of General Health Care staff and volunteers and creating widespread awareness about leprosy and the availability of treatment free of charge for all cases. This programme proved to be one of the most successful health care interventions undertaken in India in recent years, particularly in the states of Bihar and Orissa. Although a few states in India are unlikely to reach the current WHO goal of elimination before end of the year 2000, the results of the MLEC strongly support the possibility that elimination levels will be achieved in the majority of states by the end of the year 2000 and at national level by the end of the year 2002.     

Diagnostic efficiency of paramedical workers involved in leprosy case detection programme

The diagnostic efficiency and accuracy in classification of leprosy and its activity status, by four senior trained Paramedical Workers (PMWs) involved in leprosy case detection programme, was assessed on 1394 cases detected by them and concurrently confirmed by an experienced medical officer. The inter-observer variation between two experienced PMWs in diagnosis and classification of leprosy on 216 patients, was also studied. Of the 1394 cases detected by PMWs, 257 (18.44%) were wrongly diagnosed as leprosy, mostly as non-lepromatous (N) type. Though all lepromatous (L) and 98% of N-type cases were correctly classified by PMWs, 25.64% of borderline (N ? L) cases were either under-diagnosed as N-type (17.95%) or over-diagnosed as L-type (7.69%). The activity status of 19% cases was wrongly assessed by PMWs, including 8% active lesions assessed as inactive. The discrepancy between two PMWs in diagnosis, classification and assessment of activity status of leprosy was found in 1.39%, 7.41% & 25.67% cases, respectively. The implications of these observations, and the suggestions to improve the technical skills of workers for an efficient and effective implementation of leprosy control programme, are discussed in this communication.     

麻风病基本消灭阶段的流行病学特征

目的：分析麻风病基本消灭阶段流行病学特征,以指导麻风防治工作。方法：根据山东省历年的麻风病人登记表,分析比较麻风基本消灭阶段与防治初期的流行学特征。结果：麻风基本消灭阶段的流行病学特征与防治初期比较有显著变化;新病例呈散在分布;发病年龄显著升高;少年儿童发病显著减少;多菌型病例所占比升高。复发病例在新发病例中占比升高。结论：麻风病中、高流行区达到基本消灭麻风病后,应根据其流行病学特征采取相应防治对