Lipoatrophy in patients with multiple sclerosis on glatiramer acetate

BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis on the disease modifying therapy of glatiramer acetate may be experiencing an adverse reaction of lipoatrophy at the sites of their subcutaneous injections. The purpose of this study was to complete a full examination of the injection site areas for users of glatiramer acetate, and to examine the relationship between lipoatrophy and patient characteristics. METHODS: Glatiramer acetate users were identified by means of chart review. Over six months, during regular clinic appointments, assessment included a full examination of injection site areas including visual inspection and manual palpation. Additional patient and clinical characteristics were obtained by means of chart review and patient questioning. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients had been or were current users of glatiramer acetate. Of these, 34 (45%) had evidence of lipoatrophy in at least one injection site area. All were female, and five had severe, nine had moderate and 20 had mild lipoatrophy. In some cases, lipoatrophy occurred within months of therapy initiation. Case reviews are included for five of the 34 patients, along with photographs of the lipoatrophy, a magnetic resonance image and comments on skin biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of lipoatrophy was much higher than expected. Possible reasons for this adverse reaction are explored and suggested treatment recommendations are reviewed. Lipoatrophy can be very disfiguring and is thought to be permanent, and the psychological impact can be significant. It is, therefore, important that patients be aware of the possibility of lipoatrophy, be able to identify it and discontinue injecting in areas where it is identified.     

Long-term (up to 22 years), open-label, compassionate-use study of glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term glatiramer acetate (GA) therapy, 46 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) were treated for up to 22 years in an ongoing, open-label study. Kurtzke expanded disability status scale (EDSS) was measured every six months, relapses were reported at occurrence and patients self-reported adverse events (AEs). At GA initiation, disease durations ranged from 0-20 years (median 6.0 years) and at data cut-off (October 2004), GA therapy duration ranged from 1-22 years (median 12.0 years). Mean EDSS score increased 0.9 +/- 1.9 from the pretreatment score (3.0 +/- 1.8; P = 0.076). Only 10/28 (36%) patients with baseline EDSS <4.0 had a last observed value >or= 4.0 and 8/34 (24%) with entry EDSS < 6.0 reached EDSS >or= 6.0. A majority (57%) maintained improved or unchanged EDSS scores. Annualized relapse rate decreased to 0.1 +/- 0.2 from 2.9 +/- 1.4 prestudy (P < 0.0001). Of the 18 remaining patients in October 2004 (average disease duration 23 years), 17% with baseline EDSS scores < 4.0 reached EDSS >or= 4.0 and 28% with baseline scores < 6.0 reached EDSS >or= 6.0. Adverse events were similar to those reported in short-term clinical trials. This study shows a low rate of relapses and EDSS progression in RRMS patients on GA for up to 22 years.     

Long-term effects of glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis

IntroductionMultiple sclerosis is a chronic progressive neurological disorder. For this reason, the clinician needs to have access to treatments that are effective and well-tolerated over decades. However, in the absence of long-term controlled clinical trials, it is difficult to assess the long-term benefit provided by currently available immunomodulatory treatments. The objective of this report is to review the strengths and limitations of available long-term data obtained in different phases of the randomized phase III clinical trial with glatiramer acetate collected over a 10-year period in particular.MethodsData were obtained from six published analyses of data from the phase III randomized clinical trial of glatiramer acetate performed at different times over a 10-year period. Initially patients were randomized to receive glatiramer acetate (n = 125) or placebo (n = 126) for 24 months under a double blind scheme, which was subsequently extended to up to 35 months. All patients were then proposed to continue glatiramer acetate treatment in an open-label prospective extension. Analyses of this extension study were performed at six and eight years after initial randomization. Finally, a pooled analysis was performed after a mean treatment duration of 10 years of all patients who had ever received glatiramer acetate during the study. Data were available for 68% of the original cohort at 10 years. At this stage, 108 patients (46.6%) had been continually treated with glatiramer acetate for a mean duration of 10 years.ResultsAfter one year of treatment, the annualized relapse rate decreased by around 50% from 1.18 relapses/year before inclusion to 0.60 relapses/year. Thereafter, relapse rates continued to decline progressively, reaching less than 0.2 relapses/year from the ninth year of treatment onward. For 65% of patients, EDSS disability scores remained stable or improved over the entire treatment period, and 8% had reached a score of 6 on the EDSS scale (inability to walk unaided) after a mean continuous treatment duration of 10 years. With respect to safety, 23 patients (< 10%) needed to stop treatment due to an adverse event over the 10-year follow-up period. The most frequently encountered adverse events were local injection site reactions and systemic immediate postinjection reactions. No specific safety issue associated with long-term treatment was identified.ConclusionsThe information collected from prospective long-term follow-up of patients treated with glatiramer acetate extending out to 10 years provide clear evidence for the long-term efficacy and adequate safety of this immunomodulatory treatment in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis over a period of at least 10 years.     

A longitudinal observational study of a cohort of patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis treated with glatiramer acetate

Immunomodulatory treatments for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) are not efficacious or tolerated in all patients. It is important to evaluate alternative classes of treatment in patients failing first-line therapy. The objective of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glatiramer acetate in patients, to whom β -interferons could not be administered. The study included patients with RRMS who were intolerant to or had contraindications to β -interferon. After initiation of glatiramer acetate treatment, follow-up visits were made every 3 months, when data on neurologist-ascertained relapses and disability [Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score] were collected. Tolerability was evaluated by spontaneous adverse event reporting. Overall, 205 patients were studied and 113 (55.1%) treated for at least 4 years. The proportion of patients presenting over three relapses per year decreased from 51.2% to 8.4% in the 2 years following treatment initiation. Over 5 years of treatment, mean annualized relapse rates and mean EDSS scores remained stable (0.4–0.6 relapses/year and 3.6 ± 1.8–3.3 ± 2.1 respectively). Adverse events were reported by 179 patients, leading to discontinuation of treatment in 10 patients. Patients with RRMS to whom β -interferons cannot be prescribed can benefit from treatment with glatiramer acetate.     

Treatment with glatiramer acetate induces specific IgG4 antibodies in multiple sclerosis patients

We analysed the humoral immune response to glatiramer acetate (GA, Copaxone) in 20 multiple sclerosis patients treated with GA, 20 patients not treated with GA and 20 normal control subjects. Using an ELISA for detection of total GA-reactive immunoglobulins (all isotypes), all treated patients but also 3/20 untreated and 8/20 healthy subjects scored positive at 1:20 plasma dilutions. At higher dilutions, 5/20 treated patients and two healthy donors had relatively high levels of anti-GA antibodies. Isotype and IgG subclass analysis revealed that the two antibody-positive normal subjects had IgM and small titers of IgG1 or IgG2 antibodies. In contrast, 18 of 20 GA-treated patients, had low but significant titers of GA-reactive IgG4 antibodies. This finding is consistent with the previously described GA-mediated induction of T-helper 2 (TH2)-like regulatory T cells.     

Endermology: a treatment for injection-induced lipoatrophy in multiple sclerosis patients treated with sub cutaneous glatiramer acetate

Objective

To evaluate sessions of endermology (LPG) on patients with lipoatrophy, due to GA injections in an open-labelled study.

Background

Glatiramer acetate (GA) is an immunomodulatory drug, with an excellent safety profile, that is currently used for treatment of multiple sclerosis and is administered as daily subcutaneous injections of 20 mg. The most common adverse effects, which occur in approximately 20–60% of the patients, include pain, inflammation and induration at the injection sites. Another adverse effect is frank panniculitis followed by localized lipoatrophy at the injection sites, which has been described in half of the patients receiving treatment with glatiramer acetate injections. No treatment has been found for established lipoatrophy.

Patients and methods

All patients underwent LPG twice a week during 30 min. A cycle of two months was initially proposed. If the patient was satisfied with the result, sessions were continued with one session per week until the 4th month.

Results

Eight Patients treated with GA and presenting with lipoatrophy were prospectively recruited. None of them complained of any adverse events. After 8 weeks of treatment, all had a visible reduction of lipoatrophic area. MRI showed no major subcutaneous changes except for a reduction in and repartition of fatty tissues.

Conclusion

The LPG cellu M6 keymodule is a mechanotransduction machine that stimulates the skin's surface in triggering cells to activate lipolysis and collagen production. It has never been used for treatment of lipoatrophy due to drug treatment or in specific diseases associated with lipoatrophy (diabetes, HIV). The prevention and management of lipoatrophy includes patient education, regular examination and manual palpation of all injection sites. LPG endermology can help patients to resolve this side effect and to continue immunomodulatory treatment.     

Long-term therapy with glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis: effect on T-cells

Glatiramer acetate (GA) is an immunotherapeutic drug for multiple sclerosis (MS). Several mechanisms of action have been demonstrated which target and affect T-cells that are specific for myelin antigen epitopes. We measured the in vitro proliferation of GA-responsive T-cells from untreated MS patients and from normal healthy subjects; in addition, we determined the effect of prolonged GA therapy or interferon-beta therapy on the in vitro proliferation of GA-responsive T-cells of MS patients. We found that GA induces the proliferation of T-cells isolated from individuals who have not been previously exposed to GA, and that long-term in vivo therapy of MS patients with GA abrogates the GA-induced proliferative response of T-cells. In GA-treated patients, there is no evidence of generalized immunosuppression; both tetanus toxoid and anti-CD3 induced proliferative responses remain unaffected. We propose that prolonged in vivo exposure to GA may result in the eventual induction of anergy or deletion of a population of GA-responsive cells that may also be T-cells that are pathogenic in MS. This mechanism of action, in addition to other mechanisms that have been demonstrated, suggests that GA has pleiotropic effects on the immune system in MS.     

Erythema nodosum and glatiramer acetate treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Glatiramer acetate (GA), a well tolerated immunomodulatory treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS), consists of a 4-amino acid polymer that mimics the myelin basic protein (MBP). We report the first case of biopsy-proven erythema nodosum (EN) in a patient presenting RR-MS under GA treatment. Comprehensive exams were negative in the search of the etiology of EN, which spontaneously resolved despite treatment continuation. GA treatment is known to generate reactive polyclonal antibodies that can cross-react with myelin epitopes, like MBP. These antibodies may also be implicated in allergenic reactions and auto-immune adverse events, such as anaphylactic shock, lymphadenopathy, livedo-like dermatitis, or lymphocytic infiltration. EN is an unspecific skin reaction occurring in several disorders and induced by many treatments. As EN can result from a polyclonal antibody response or type I hypersensitivity mechanisms, we hypothesize that GA treatment could be responsible for the occurrence of EN.     

Combination therapy with interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of mono-therapy with interferon-beta (IFN-beta) or glatiramer acetate (GA) with IFN-beta + GA combination therapy for persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). MATERIALS & METHODS: In the context of a longitudinal observational study at the MS Centre, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, 83 persons with MS receiving mono-therapy at baseline were studied. Because of MS worsening 21 switched to IFN-beta + GA combination therapy for 16-24 months, and 62 remained on the same mono-therapy for 24 months. Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite, cognitive function, depressed mood, relapse occurrence and perceived physical and psychological impact were assessed. Linear mixed-effects models and generalized estimating equations were employed to evaluate changes in each outcome over time. RESULTS: Patients on IFN-beta + GA therapy showed greater change in odds for high perceived psychological impact. No other significant differences between treatments were found. CONCLUSIONS: The results underline the need for a randomized trial of IFN-beta + GA in MS.     

Longitudinal magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of primary progressive multiple sclerosis patients treated with glatiramer acetate: multicenter study

Multicenter proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) studies were performed on 58 primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) patients from four centers for investigating the efficacy of glatiramer acetate (GA) treatment. These patients were drawn from 943 subjects who participated in the PROMiSe trial. In these MRSI studies, patients were followed over a period of 3 years. MRSI data were acquired by all the centers using the same pulse sequence, and spectral analysis was performed at a single site using a customized analysis software package. Quantitative metabolite ratios, N-acetyl aspartate (NAA)/creatine (Cr) and choline (Cho)/Cr, were compared between GA-treated and placebo-treated PPMS patients. There was no significant difference in metabolite ratios between GA-treated and placebo-treated patients. The difference in metabolite ratios between the normal-appearing tissues (NAT) and lesion-containing regions (LCR) in GA treated patients was not significantly different from placebo treated patients. Strong lipid resonances, even in the absence of lesions, were observed on MRSI data in both gray matter and white matter in placebo- and GA-treated PPMS patients. No significant difference in number of patients with lipids between the two groups over a period of 3 years was found.     

Mechanism of action of glatiramer acetate in treatment of multiple sclerosis

Glatiramer acetate (GA) (Copolymer-1, Copaxone, Teva, Israel, YEAK) is a polypeptide-based therapy approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Most investigations have attributed the immunomodulatory effect of GAs to its capability to alter T-cell differentiation. Specifically, GA treatment is believed to promote development of Th2-polarized GA-reactive CD4⁺ T-cells, which may dampen neighboring inflammation within the central nervous system. Recent reports indicate that the deficiency in CD4⁺CD25⁺FoxP3⁺ regulatory T-cells in multiple sclerosis is restored by GA treatment. GA also exerts immunomodulatory activity on antigen presenting cells, which participate in innate immune responses. These new findings represent a plausible explanation for GA-mediated T-cell immune modulation and may provide useful insight for the development of new and more effective treatment options for multiple sclerosis.     

Comparison of glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) and interferon beta-1b (Betaferon) in multiple sclerosis patients: an open-label 2-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy, as expressed by relapse rate and disability accumulation, and safety profile of glatiramer acetate (Copaxone; COP-1) and Interferon beta-1b (Betaferon; IFN beta - 1b) administered to multiple sclerosis patients during a 2-year follow-up on an open-label parallel design, as compared to their clinical condition in the 2-year period prior to treatment. BACKGROUND: Copaxone and IFN beta - 1b have been recently introduced for the treatment of relapsing forms of MS. Both medications have been proven to have a relatively safe profile and are used extensively world-wide. METHODS: 58 consecutive patients with relapsing forms of MS were enrolled from the MS out-patient clinic, during three months. After being informed in detail of the two approved treatment options existing at the time in Israel, the patients chose by themselves to receive either: (a) Copaxone 20 mg subcutaneously (sc) daily (Copaxone dly, 20 patients), or (b) Copaxone 20 mg sc alternate-day (Copaxone alt, 18 patients) or (c) IFN beta-1b 8 MIU sc in alternate day (20 patients). Mean relapse rate/year and mean EDSS/year were calculated for each group of patients during the 2 years prior to the onset of treatment, and during the year prior to the onset of treatment. Statistical significance was observed in the relapse rate in the year prior to the onset of treatment between the IFN beta -1b group and the two Copaxone groups (p = 0.05). This statistical difference has no effect on the overall data of the 2 years prior to starting the treatment and on the results. No statistical significance was observed in the total number of relapses, and on the 2-year relapse rate, prior to the onset of treatment. Mean relapse rate/year and mean EDSS/year were calculated for each group during the first and second year of treatment. Wilcoxon analysis for clinical data and chi-square for adverse events were applied. RESULTS: The three groups were statistically comparable concerning mean relapse/year in the 2 years before the trial started and no statistical significance was observed among the three groups. A statistically significant reduction in the mean relapse rate in the 2 years after onset of treatment was observed in the three group of patients: Copaxone daily (dly) 1.1 +/- 0.6 (p = 0.0001); Copaxone alternate (alt) 0.9 +/- 0.6 (p = 0.0004) and IFN beta -1b 1.2 +/- 0.7 (p = 0.0001). Disability as expressed by EDSS score prior to the onset of treatment and after 2 years of treatment showed deterioration in the three groups although more significant in the Copaxone groups: Copaxone dly 3.3 +/- 1.4 to 3.8 +/- 1.6 (p = 0.007); Copaxone alt 2.4 +/- 1.1 to 2.8 +/- 1.3 (p=0.04); IFN beta - 1b 3.1 +/- 1.3 to 3.3 +/- 2.0 (N.S.). The most common adverse events reported were: (1) flu-like symptoms 7 pts (35%) in the IFN beta -1b group; 10 pts (26%) of the two Copaxone groups; (2) increased spasticity of lower limbs 3 pts (15%), only in the IFN beta -1b group; (3) site injection reaction (SIR): 16 SIR (80%) in the IFN beta -1b group; 12 SIR (67%) in the Copaxone alt group; 14 SIR (70%) in the Copaxone dly group; and (4) systemic reaction 3 pts (15%) in the IFN beta -1b group; 4 pts (22%) in the Copaxone alt group; 6 pts (30%) in the Copaxone dly group. Premature termination occurred in five patients treated with Copaxone (3 in the alternate group and 2 in the daily group). CONCLUSION: The present study, despite the limitations of an open-label study, shows that Copaxone dly, Copaxone alt and IFN beta -1b treatment seem to be equally effective for the control of exacerbations in MS. The adverse event profile, as reported by the patients, was also similar. However, the adverse events profile registered indicated that Copaxone is somewhat less detrimental, whereas disability as measured by EDSS accumulation showed that the interferon beta - 1b patients demonstrated a slower progression of the disability.     

Clinical and immune responses correlate in glatiramer acetate therapy of multiple sclerosis

Glatiramer acetate (GA) treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) leads to decreased GA-specific proliferative responses and a Th2 cytokine shift. To study a possible correlation between immunological and clinical responses to GA therapy, we prospectively followed RRMS patients clinically, by magnetic resonance imaging and by primary immunological assays. Fluctuation of GA-specific proliferative responses was significantly lower in treatment responders than in untreated patients, and GA-specific proliferative responses were increased during relapses. These associations suggest a possible causal relationship between immunological and clinical responses to GA therapy. Primary proliferation assays may thus be a useful marker for treatment response.