Assessment of salt intake in hemodialysis

One of the main goals of dialysis is to reach a correct sodium balance. Dietary sodium restriction facilitates control of thirst, water overload, hypertension and cardiac failure. Nowadays, it is possible to estimate sodium mass transfer and known interdialytic salt intake, by means of non-invasive methods. The use of dialysate sodium profiles improves dialysis tolerance but it has been reported that interdialytic thirst may increase because of an inappropriate sodium balance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usual salt intake in hemodialysis patients, the effects on interdialytic gain weight, arterial pressure, blood volume preservation and dialysis tolerance of two different profiles of dialysate sodium and an additional session with salt restriction. Seventeen dialysis patients, 12 male and 5 females, were studied. Each patient underwent seven hemodialysis treatments: three consecutives sessions (a week) with constant sodium and ultrafiltration hemodialysis; three consecutive sessions with exponential decrease of conductivity (Initial 15.5-16.0, mid-session 14.3 and at the end 13.9-14 mS/cm) and ultrafiltration (1.6 l/h initial and 0.1 at the end) profiled hemodialysis; and an additional session which had a special dietary salt restriction. Dialysis parameters and dry weight were kept constant. Integra monitor with Diascan and Hemoscan biosensors (Hospal) were used in all sessions. We measured pre- and postdialytic plasma conductivity, sodium mass transfer, interdialytic weight gain, mean arterial pressure (MAP), percent reductions of blood volume (%R-BV) and hypotensive episodes during dialysis. Mean sodium mass transfer was 1,144 +/- 356 mmol (no profile week) vs 1,242 +/- 349 mmol (week with profiles), NS. It was equivalent to a salt ingestion of 9.6 +/- 3 and 10.4 +/- 3 g/day respectively. End plasma conductivity was 14.04 +/- 0.14 (no profile) versus 14.21 +/- 0.08 mS/cm (profiled), p < 0.001. Interdialytic weight gain was 2.49 +/- 0.76 (no profile) vs 2.32 +/- 0.56 kg (profiled), NS. MAP was 101 +/- 11 (no profile) vs 99 +/- 10 mmHg (profiled), NS. The %R-BV was -7.73 +/- 3 (no profile) vs -6.46 +/- 3% (profiled), p < 0.01. Hypotensive episodes/session were 0.66 +/- 0.75 (no profiles) vs 0.41 +/- 0.57 (profiled), NS. Mean sodium mass transfer was 356 +/- 125 mmol with usual salt intake and 240 +/- 81 mmol with salt restriction, p < 0.001. It was equivalent to a salt ingestion of 10.47 +/- 3 versus 7.06 +/- 2 g per day respectively, p < 0.001. Initial plasma conductivity was 14.31 +/- 0.21 (usually sodium intake) versus 14.16 +/- 0.17 mS/cm (salt restriction), p < 0.01. Predialysis blood pressures were decreased with dietary salt restriction, MAP was 99.1 +/- 11 vs 94.4 +/- 12 mmHg (p < 0.01). Interdialytic weight gain decreased with salt restriction, 2.32 +/- 0.76 vs 1.78 +/- 0.49 kg (p < 0.001). The %R-BV was -7.25 +/- 2 (usual sodium intake) vs -5.91 +/- 2% (salt restriction), p < 0.01. Hypotensive episodes/session were 0.71 +/- 0.8 (usual sodium intake) vs 0.18 +/- 0.5 (salt restriction), p < 0.05. In conclusion, automatic measurement of sodium mass transfer is a practical tool to follow dietary salt ingestion in hemodialysis patients. It allows us accurate, individualised and continual dietary interventions. The use of exponential decrease sodium profiles improve dialysis tolerance without changes in sodium balance, interdialytic weight gain or arterial pressure. A reduction of three g in salt intake observed in this study was beneficial in interdialytic weight gain, dialysis tolerance and blood pressure control.     

Measuring Plasma Conductivity to Detect Sodium Load in Hemodialysis Patients

Background: Sodium thiosulfate therapy has been proposed for calcific uremic arteriolopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in hemodialysis patients. The treatment brings 3.7 g (161 mmol) of sodium. How to counterbalance this sodium load was studied.Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Plasma conductivity (Cp) and mass balance index were compared for 20 sessions without thiosulfate and 20 sessions with thiosulfate infusion. Subsequently, the dialysate conductivity was set to 13.8 mS/cm during the entire session. Next, dialysate conductivity was set to 14 mS/cm for the first 3 h and to 13 mS/cm for the last hour of thiosulfate infusion (n = 25).Results: The Cp variation between beginning and end was equal to +0.005 ± 0.13 mS/cm without thiosulfate, +0.24 ± 0.13 mS/cm with thiosulfate, and 14 mS/cm dialysate conductivity (P < 0.001). The decrease in dialysate conductivity at 13.8 mS/cm did not counterbalance the sodium load. The last program adequately compensated the sodium load with a Cp increase of only +0.05 ± 0.14 mS/cm (NS versus without thiosulfate). The total of the dialyzed sodium and the sodium load for this last program was equal to 603 mmol compared with 456 mmol for the sessions without thiosulfate, the difference of 147 mmol being close to the known content of 161 mmol in 25 g of infused thiosulfate.Conclusions: Thiosulfate infusion requires a decrease of dialysate conductivity of −1 mS/cm during the infusion to counterbalance the added 3.7 g (161 mmol) sodium load.Sodium thiosulfate treatment has been proposed to treat calcific uremic arteriolopathy in hemodialysis patients (1–4) and recently for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (5). The dose is 25 g/1.73 m² per hemodialysis session during the last 60 min. The formulation of sodium thiosulfate is Na₂S₂O₃·(H₂O)₅ and the infusion of this amount of thiosulfate brings a clinically significant sodium load. The calculated sodium load for 25 g of thiosulfate is 3.7 g (161 mmol), corresponding to the amount of sodium contained in 1 L of isotonic sodium chloride infusion.The two patients that underwent the thiosulfate treatment had developed severe calcific uremic arteriolopathy of the extremities. We decided to use sodium thiosulfate at a dose of 25 g per dialysis session. As we started the thiosulfate therapy, we rapidly noticed that the infusion induced a notable increase in plasma conductivity (Figure 1). Hence we recorded the plasma conductivity variation during the dialysis sessions under thiosulfate for the two patients and we modified the dialysate treatment to counterbalance the sodium load.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Example of a plasma conductivity curve during a dialysis session with thiosulfate infusion during the last hour of dialysis. Dialysate conductivity was kept constant at 14.0 mS/cm.     

Kt as control and follow-up of the dose at a hemodialysis unit

To ensure our patients are receiving an adequate dose in every dialysis session there must be a target to achieve this in the short or medium term. The incorporation during the last years of the ionic dialysance (ID) in the monitors, has provided monitoring of the dialysis dose in real time and in every dialysis session. Lowrie y cols., recommend monitoring the dose with Kt, recommending at least 40 L in women and 45 L in men or individualizing the dose according to the body surface area. The target of this study was to monitor the dose with Kt in every dialysis session for 3 months, and to compare it with the monthly blood test. 51 patients (58% of our hemodialysis unit), 32 men and 19 women, 60.7+/-14 years old, in the hemodialysis programme for 37.7+/-52 months, were dialysed with a monitor with IC. The etiology of their chronic renal failure was: 3 tubulo-interstitial nephropathy, 9 glomerulonephritis, 12 vascular disease, 7 polycystic kidney disease, 7 diabetic nephropathy and 13 unknown. 1,606 sessions were analysed during a 3 month period. Every patient was treated with the usual parameters of dialysis with 2.1 m2 cellulose diacetate (33.3%), 1.9 m2 polisulfone (33.3%) or 1.8 m2 helixone, dialysis time of 263+/-32 minutes, blood flow of 405+/-66, with dialysate flow of 712+/-138 and body weight of 66.7+/-14 kg. Initial ID, final ID and Kt were measured in each session. URR and Kt/V were obtained by means of a monthly blood test. The initial ID was 232+/-41 ml/min, the final ID was 197+/-44 ml/min, the mean of Kt determinations was 56.6+/-14 L, the mean of Kt/V was 1.98+/-0.5 and the mean of URR was 79.2+/-7%. Although all patients were treated with a minimum recommended dose of Kt/V and URR when we used the Kt according to gender, we observed that 31% of patients do not get the minimum dose prescribed (48.1+/-2.4 L), 34.4% of the men and 26.3% of the women. If we use the Kt individualized for the body surface area, we observe that 43.1% of the patients do not get the minimum dose prescribed with 4.6+/-3.4 L less than the dose prescribed. We conclude that the monitoring of dialysis dose with the Kt provides a better discrimination detecting that between 30 and 40% of the patients perhaps do not get an adequate dose for their gender or body surface area.     

Short-term blood pressure, noradrenergic, and vascular effects of nocturnal home hemodialysis

Long-term nocturnal hemodialysis, which uses longer and more frequent sessions than conventional hemodialysis, lowers clinic blood pressure and left ventricular mass. We tested the hypotheses that short-term nocturnal hemodialysis would (1) reduce ambulatory blood pressure; (2) cause peripheral vasodilation; (3) lower plasma norepinephrine concentration; and (4) improve the arterial response to reactive hyperemia (a marker of endothelium-dependent vasodilation). We studied 18 consecutive patients (age, 41+/-2; [mean+/-SEM]) before and 1 and 2 months after conversion from conventional (three 4-hour sessions per week) to nocturnal (six 8-hour sessions per week) hemodialysis. As the dialysis dose per session (Kt/V) increased from 1.24+/-0.06 to 2.04+/-0.08 after 2 months (P=0.02), symptomatic hypotension developed and most antihypertensive medications were withdrawn. Nocturnal hemodialysis nonetheless lowered 24-hour mean arterial pressure (from 102+/-3 to 90+/-2 mm Hg after 2 months; P=0.01), total peripheral resistance (from 1967+/-235 to 1499+/-191 dyne x s x cm(-5); P<0.01) and plasma norepinephrine (from 2.66+/-0.4 to 1.96+/-0.2 nmol; P=0.04). Endothelium-dependent vasodilation could not be elicited during conventional hemodialysis (-2.7+/-1.8%) but was restored (+8.0+/-1.0%; P=0.001) after 2 months of nocturnal hemodialysis. The brachial artery response to nitroglycerin also improved (from 6.9+/-2.8 to 15.7+/-1.6%; P<0.05). Nocturnal hemodialysis had no effect on weight or on stroke volume. Rapid reversal of these markers of adverse cardiovascular events with more intense hemodialysis may translate into improved outcome in this high-risk group of patients.     

Temperature dialysate and hemodialysis tolerance

In this study, the effect of dialysate temperature on hemodynamic stability, patients' perception of dialysis discomfort and postdialysis fatigue were assessed. Thirty-one patients of the morning shift were eligible to participate in the study. Three patients refused. Patients were assessed during 6 dialysis sessions: in three sessions the dialysate temperature was normal (37 degrees C) and in other three sessions the dialysate temperature was low (35.5 degrees C). To evaluate the symptoms along the dialysis procedure and the postdialysis fatigue, specific scale questionnaires were administered in each dialysis session and respective scores were elaborated. Low temperature dialysate was associated with higher postdialysis systolic blood pressure (122 +/- 24 vs. 126 +/- 27 mmHg, p < 0.05), and lower postdialysis heart rate (82 +/- 13 vs. 78 +/- 9 beats/min, p < 0.05) with the same ultrafiltration rate. Dialysis symptoms score and postdialysis fatigue score were better with the low dialysate temperature (0.7 +/- 0.9 vs. 0.4 +/- 1 vs. p < 0.05, and 1.3 +/- 1 vs. 1 +/- 0.9 p < 0.05, respectively). Furthermore, low temperature dialysate shortened the post-dialysis fatigue period (5.4 +/- 6.3 vs. 3.1 +/- 3.3 vs. hours, p < 0.05). The clinical improvement experimented with the low temperature dialysate was not universal. A beneficial effect was exclusively observed in the patients with higher dialysis symptoms and postdialysis fatigue scores or having more than one episode of hypotension in a week. The patients were asked about their temperature preference, 7 patients (23%) request a dialysate at 37 degrees C, 19 patients (61%) prefered to be dialysed with the low temperature dialysate, and 5 patients (16%) were indifferent. The later two groups of the patients continued with the low temperature dialysate during other 4 weeks. At the end of that period, the clinical improvement remained unchanged. In summary, low temperature dialysate is particularly beneficial for highly symptomatic patients.     

Evaluation of pre- and postdilutional on-line hemodiafiltration adequacy by partial dialysate quantification and on-line urea monitor.

On-line highflux hemodiafiltration (HDF) is a clinically interesting and effective mode of renal replacement therapy, which offers the possibility to obtain an increased removal of both small and large solutes. The fundamental role of urea kinetic monitoring to assess dialysis adequacy in conventional hemodialysis has been widely studied. Both direct measurement of the urea removed by the modified direct dialysate quantitation (mDDQ) based on partial dialysate collection (PDC) and dialysate-based urea kinetic modeling (DUKM) using urea monitor have been advocated. The validity of this assessment tool in the patients with on-line HDF remained unclear. The aims of this investigation were (1) to compare the delivered Kt/V, urea mass removal (UMR), solute removal index (SRI) and normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) between pre- and postdilutional high-flux HDF; (2) to verify and compare the efficiency of pre- and postdilutional HDF using DUKM with on-line dialysate urea sensor, and mDDQ with partial dialysate collection. During both mode of HDF, the paired analysis urea removed and Kt/V showed no significant difference. Using mDDQ, mean values for predilutional mode were as follows: Kt/V 1.53 +/- 0.01 UMR, 16.8 +/- 0.3 g/session; urea clearance 178 +/- 18 ml/min; SRI 75.5 +/- 7.7%; urea distribution volume (V) 28.3 +/- 1.2 liters; nPCR 1.34 +/- 0.18 g/kg/day; on the other hand, mean values for postdilutional mode were Kt/V 1.58 +/- 0.01; UMR 17.10 +/- 0.28 g/session; urea clearance 184 +/- 21 ml/min; SRI 77.2 +/- 3.5%; urea distribution volume, 27.8 +/- 1.5 liters; nPCR 1.34 +/- 0.19 g/kg/day. The mean value of urea generation rate was 5.82 +/- 1.12 mg/min during HDF. Our results showed that dialysis adequacy was achieved with both high-volume predilutional HDF and postdilutional HDF. These two modes of HDF provided similar and adequate small solute clearance. In addition, we found that on-line analysis of urea kinetics is a reliable tool for quantifying and assuring delivery of adequate dialysis.     

Acetate-free hemodialysis: a feasibility study on a technical alternative to bicarbonate dialysis

This study aimed at evaluating the feasibility of an acetate-free hemodialysis (AFHD) technique, comparing it with acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) and bicarbonate dialysis (BD). The assessment of the parameters concerned: electrolyte kinetics (Na+, K+), acid-base balance (HCO3-, pH), dialysis efficiency (Kt/V), serum beta2-microglobulin reduction ratio, nutritional status (normalized protein catabolic rate, serum albumin and total proteins, body mass index), hemopoietic status (hemoglobin, hematocrit), and some clinical parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressures, heart rate, percent blood volume reduction measured by Hemoscan). Nine patients participated in this study which was conducted using a Latin square randomized experimental design. The results of the last week of each month of the study (1 month for each technique) were analyzed by means of Anova for repeated measures. The different treatments were comparable with regard to the main dialysis parameters such as blood flow (320 ml/min) and weight loss rate (0.6 +/- 0.1 kg/h), while dialysis length and dialysate conductivities were different, depending on the dialysis technique. Electrolyte kinetics and acid-base balance were similar during the three periods. The dialysis efficiency for small molecules (Kt/V of urea) was similar (between 1.4 and 1.6); however, AFB seemed to show a higher beta2-microglobulin reduction rate (47.6 +/- 4 vs. 4.3 +/- 10% for AFHD and vs. 9.9 +/- 5% for BD; p < 0.001). The nutritional and hemopoietic status maintained stable, and the hemodynamic parameters were comparable during all periods. The percent blood volume reduction at the end of the treatments was not statistically different (-14.9 +/- 9.4% in AFB, -12.1 +/- 5.1% in AFHD, and -12.2 +/- 4.4% in BD), and these results could explain the similar hemodynamic behavior during the three periods. In conclusion, AFHD appears to be a safe technique which has all positive effects of AFB and the low costs of BD. In our opinion, it could be used in patients with few clinical impairments, usually treated with hemodialysis, in whom a biocompatible treatment is indicated.     

Nitric oxide synthetic capacity in relation to dialysate temperature

BACKGROUND: During hemodialysis, vascular reactivity is impaired, which can be corrected by lowering dialysate temperature. It has also been shown that nitric oxide (NO) is related to intradialytic hypotension. As NO synthesis may be temperature-dependent, this study addressed the influence of dialysate temperature on the NO synthetic capacity of plasma. METHODS: NO synthetic capacity was studied during hemodialysis with a dialysate temperature of 37.5 degrees C (dialysis-37.5 degrees C) and programmed extracorporeal blood cooling (cool dialysis; Blood Temperature Monitor; Fresenius C) in 12 stable patients. NO synthetic capacity was assessed ex vivo by [3H]L-citrulline formation from [3H]L-arginine in cultured endothelial cells after incubation with plasma samples obtained during the respective sessions. RESULTS: Core temperature decreased (-0.32 +/- 0.10 degrees C) and energy transfer rate was significantly lower (-27.5 +/- 2.8 W; p < 0.05) during cool dialysis compared to dialysis-37.5 degrees C (0.19 +/- 0.06 degrees C and -0.8 +/- 1.2 W respectively; p < 0.05). Systolic blood pressure decreased during dialysis-37.5 degrees C (-19 +/- 4 mm Hg; p < 0.05), but not during cool dialysis (-6 +/- 5 mm Hg). NO synthetic capacity increased during dialysis-37.5 degrees C (55.5 +/- 9.3 to 73.5 +/- 10.2 pmol/10(5) cells; p < 0.05), in contrast to cool dialysis (67.3 +/- 11.1 to 66.2 +/- 10.8 pmol/10(5) cells). CONCLUSION: The stimulatory effect of uremic plasma on endothelial NO synthesis was augmented during dialysis-37.5 degrees C but not during cool dialysis.     

Ultrapure dialysate reduces plasma levels of beta2-microglobulin and pentosidine in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND: beta2-Microglobulin (beta2MG) and carbonyl stress are reported to contribute to the development of dialysis-related amyloidosis. The aim of this study was to determine whether the purity of dialysate affects plasma levels of beta2MG and pentosidine (a surrogate marker of carbonyl stress) in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Sixteen patients on hemodialysis with a polysulfone membrane participated in this study. We switched the dialysate from conventional dialysate (endotoxin level 0.055-0.066 endotoxin units (EU)/ml) to ultrapure dialysate (endotoxin level <0.001 EU/ml), followed patients for 6 months, and then switched back to conventional dialysate once again. Plasma levels of beta2MG, pentosidine, CRP and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were determined before the switch to ultrapure dialysate, 1 and 6 months after the switch to ultrapure dialysate, and 1 month after the switch back to conventional dialysate. RESULTS: The switch from conventional to ultrapure dialysate significantly decreased plasma levels of beta2MG, from 30.1 +/- 1.4 to 27.1 +/- 1.4 mg/dl (p < 0.05) and pentosidine, from 1,535.8 +/- 107.5 to 1,267.6 +/- 102.9 nmol/l (p < 0.01) after 1 month of use. The change of dialysate also significantly decreased plasma levels of CRP, from 0.28 +/- 0.09 to 0.14 +/- 0.05 mg/dl (p < 0.05) and IL-6, from 9.4 +/- 2.7 to 3.5 +/- 0.8 pg/ml (p < 0.01) over the 1-month period. These changes in plasma levels of beta2MG, pentosidine, CRP and IL-6 were maintained over 6 months after switching to ultrapure dialysate and returned to basal levels by switching back to a conventional dialysate. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrapure dialysate decreases plasma levels of beta2MG, pentosidine and inflammatory markers in hemodialysis patients. The use of ultrapure dialysate might be useful in preventing and/or treating complications of dialysis, such as dialysis-related amyloidosis, atherosclerosis and malnutrition.     

Determination of vancomycin and gentamicin clearance in an <Emphasis Type="Italic">in vitro</Emphasis>, closed loop dialysis system

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing an in-vitro, closed loop hemodialysis system as a method to assess drug clearance. Secondarily, this study tested the influence of variables (blood flow rate, dialysate flow rate, and type of filter) in the hemodialysis procedure on the clearance of vancomycin and gentamicin.

Methods

An in-vitro, closed loop hemodialysis system was constructed. The vancomycin (30 mg/L) and gentamicin (25 mg/L) were added to a simulated blood system (SBS). Four conditions (C1-C4) were tested by defining the filter (Polyflux 170H or F180) and the blood and dialysate flow rates (BFR and DFR). All hemodialysis sessions were 3 hours in length and each condition was completed in duplicate. Dialysate effluent was collected in a 50 gallon polyethylene drum. Samples were collected (in duplicate) from the SBS and the dialysate effluent at baseline and at the end of the hemodialysis session. Samples were analyzed for vancomycin and gentamicin with an ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method.

Results

A total of eight 3-hour hemodialysis sessions were conducted. For all tested conditions (C1-C4), vancomycin was undetectable in the SBS at the end of dialysis. However, total vancomycin recovery in the dialysis effluent was 85±18%, suggesting that up to 15% may have adsorbed to the dialysis filter or tubing. Gentamicin clearance from SBS was >98% in all tested conditions. Average gentamicin recovery in the dialysate effluent was 99±15%.

Conclusion

Both vancomycin and gentamicin were readily removed by high-flux hemodialysis under all conditions studied. No significant differences in drug clearance were observed between conditions used in this in vitro study. The clinical implications of changing these hemodialysis parameters are unknown.

     

枸橼酸碳酸氢盐透析液对血液透析患者高血压的影响

目的:比较枸橼酸碳酸氢盐透析液与普通碳酸氢盐透析液治疗维持性血液透析患者透析中血压的影响。方法:20例患者随机分为两组,各10例,分别使用枸橼酸碳酸氢盐透析液和普通碳酸氢盐透析液进行透析,第一组患者使用普通碳酸氢盐透析液治疗4周后切换为枸橼酸碳酸氢盐透析液治疗4周。第二组患者直接切换为枸橼酸碳酸氢盐透析液治疗4周后再次切换成普通碳酸氢盐透析液治疗4周。记录透析前后及透析过程中的实验室数据进行统计分析。结果:(1)使用枸橼酸碳酸氢盐透析液的患者透析过程中患者的平均收缩压明显低于普通碳酸氢盐透析液透析时(P0.01),平均动脉压(MAP)较普通碳酸氢盐透析液透析时降低(P0.05);枸橼酸碳酸氢盐透析液透析时患者透析中高血压的发生率为3.3%,明显低于使用普通碳酸氢盐透析液透析时(20%,P0.01)。(2)使用不同透析液透析时患者透析前血清总钙离子与离子钙水平无统计学差异,枸橼酸碳酸氢盐透析液透析时患者透析后血清总钙离子和离子钙水平明显著低于普通碳酸氢盐透析液透析时(P0.01)。普通碳酸氢盐透析液透析时患者透后血清总钙离子及离子钙水平较透前显著升高(P0.01),使用枸橼酸碳酸氢盐透析时患者仅出现透后血清离子钙水平下降(P0.01),而透析前、后血清总钙离子水平无明显改变。(3)不同透析液透析前、后BUN均无统计学差异。虽然枸橼酸碳酸氢盐透析液透析时患者尿素清除指数(Kt/V)要略高于普通碳酸氢盐透析液透析时,但两者之间无统计学差异。两组患者均未出现严重的低血压、低钙血症及抽搐等不良反应。结论:应用枸橼酸碳酸氢盐透析液治疗的患者透析中血压的控制明显优于普通碳酸氢盐透析液。其血压控制佳、高血压发生率低,无严重低血压、抽搐以及碱中毒等不良反应。透析后离子钙浓度减低,但并未发生明显低钙血症。证实了其在临床应用的有效性和安全性。     

Acetate-free biofiltration: hemodiafiltration with base-free dialysate

Bicarbonate dialysis has several clinical advantages compared to conventional acetate hemodialysis. However, the use of bicarbonate in the dialysate requires complicated hardware with considerable maintenance and servicing. We have developed a new dialysis technique, a modification of hemodiafiltration, called acetate-free biofiltration (AFBF), with no base replacement agents in the dialysate and with the infusion of bicarbonate solution in postdilution fluid. This study consisted of two parts, an acute phase (8 dialysis patients) and a chronic phase (4 patients) lasting up to 12 months. In the first phase we evaluated the effects of different amounts of infused bicarbonate (from 751 to 1,002 mEq per session) on acid-base balance. The best correction of uremic acidosis was obtained with the infusion of 900-1,000 HCO3 mEq during a 3-hour AFBF. There was a significant (p less than 0.0001) positive correlation between infused and gained bicarbonate. In the chronic part, 880-910 HCO3 mEq was infused per session and there was an increase in mean pretreatment plasma bicarbonate from 18.1 +/- 2.2 upon starting to 22.8 +/- 0.4 mEq/l by the end of the 12-month period. A very low incidence of intradialytic hypotension and stable serum chemistries were achieved with this technique as compared with standard hemodialysis despite a reduction of 3 h in weekly treatment time. AFBF is an easy-to-use, safe alternative to bicarbonate dialysis thanks to the absence of pyrogen reactions and comparatively low-cost maintenance.     

Membrane biocompatibility does not affect whole body protein metabolism during dialysis

BACKGROUND: Protein-calorie malnutrition is present in 30-50% of dialysis patients. The lack of biocompatibility of the dialysis membrane, which results in low-grade inflammation, could be responsible for this malnutrition. We investigated whether protein-energy malnutrition could be partly due to incompatibility of the dialyzer during the dialysis session. METHODS: Five patients were dialyzed during 2 periods of 3 weeks (cross-over) with either a single-use low-flux polysulfone or cellulose triacetate (biocompatible) or a single-use cuprophan (bio-incompatible) membrane. As a measure of whole body protein metabolism, a primed constant infusion of L-[1-(13)C]-valine was used during a 4-hour dialysis session. RESULTS: Cuprophan was a more powerful activator of the complement system than other membranes. Protein metabolism parameters during both study protocols were not different and resulted in the same protein balance during polysulfone/cellulose triacetate (-15 +/- 3) and cuprophan (-13 +/- 2 micromol/kg/h) dialysis. CONCLUSION: In stable hemodialysis patients with no apparent complications, protein metabolism during dialysis is not affected by the compatibility of the dialysis membrane.     

Long nocturnal dialysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The continuous growth of the dialysis pool in our unit induced us to organize a third long nocturnal dialysis (LND) session, considering the excellent survival and rehabilitation results reported with this method. This paper analyzes the results and assesses the role of LND among the different dialytic treatment options. METHODS: Out of 18 patients on LND, 13 (12 males and 1 female, mean age 52 +/- 13 years, time on dialysis 21.8 +/- 23.8 months) with >6 months' experience were studied, and 9 underwent a further metabolic evaluation. LND was performed using 1- to 1.4-m(2) Hemophan membranes, bicarbonate buffer, 200-250 ml/min blood flow, and 300-500 ml/min dialysate flow, 8 h three times a week. Kt/V and protein catabolic rate (3-point classic urea kinetics), postdialytic weight, serum albumin, total protein, hemoglobin, Ca(2+), phosphate, intact parathyroid hormone, bioimpedance body water, blood pressure, and drug use (antihypertensives, phosphate binders, erythropoietin, vitamin D, hypnotics) were evaluated in each patient during hemodialysis and LND. In the metabolic study (done twice), sodium (compared with the Kimura model), potassium, phosphate, and urea were analyzed in blood and inlet and outlet dialysate after 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h. RESULTS: The mortality was low (1 death every 247 patient-months). After 19 +/- 8.1 months of LND, the postdialytic weight rose from 68.5 +/- 9.6 to 70.8 +/- 10.7 kg (p < or = 0.01), and the hemoglobin concentration rose from 10.8 +/- 2.2 to 11.8 +/- 1.8 g/dl (p < or = 0.05); phosphate dropped from 5.6 +/- 2.0 to 4.4 +/- 1.3 mg/ dl (p < or = 0.01) and the systolic blood pressure from 152 +/- 15 to 143 +/- 19 mm Hg (p < or = 0.05). In the metabolic study, the sodium profile was significantly lower during the last 4 h than in the Kimura model. The potassium concentration, stable between 4 and 6 h, rose against the gradient during the last 2-hour period. The behavior of sodium and potassium during the last part of the dialysis session can be taken to indicate exhaustion of the sodium/potassium pump. Phosphate showed a gradual reduction with no intradialytic and only a moderate postdialytic rebound. The postdialytic urea rebound was 23.4%. CONCLUSIONS: LND is a useful additional tool for nephrologists in treating chronic renal failure, it is easy to organize, and it shows overall good results. Together with other dialysis methods, this schedule permits individualized treatment for each uremic patient.     

维持性血液透析患者透析液钠模式的选择

维持性血液透析患者容量超负荷的现象非常普遍,调整透析液的钠离子浓度可清除体内多余水分。目前透析过程中常用的钠模式有低钠透析、标准钠透析、可调钠透析和个体化钠透析模式。前三种透析模式在透析结束时都可能会达到钠离子的负平衡或正平衡,引起透析失衡综合征或透析间期口渴、干体重增加等。个体化钠模式的目标是透析结束时实现钠离子的零平衡,既不引起钠潴留,也不过度丢失钠,更好地控制血压及干体重,减少不良事件的发生,是非常理想的透析液钠模式。     

Determination of the dose of dialysis with integrated modules in the same monitor

The "gold standard" method to measure the mass balance achieved during dialysis for a given solute is based on the total dialysate collection. This procedure is unfeasible and too cumbersome. For this reason, alternative methods have been proposed including the urea kinetic modelling (Kt/V), the measurement of effective ionic dialysance (Diascan), and the continuous spent sampling of dialysate (Quantiscan). The aim of this study was to compare the reliability and agreement of these two methods with the formulas proposed by the urea kinetic modelling for measuring the dialysis dose and others haemodialysis parameters. We studied 20 stable patients (16 men/4 women) dialyzed with a monitor equipped with the modules Diascan (DC) and Quantiscan (QC) (Integra. Hospal). The urea distribution volume (VD) was determined using anthropometric data (Watson equation) and QC data. Kt/V value was calculated according to Daurgidas 2nd generation formula corrected for the rebound (eKt/V), and using DC (Kt/VDC) and QC (Kt/VQC) data. The total mass of urea removed was calculated as 37,93 +/- 16 g/session. The VD calculated using Watson equation was 35.7 +/- 6.6 and the VDQC was 35.06 +/- 9.9. And they showed an significative correlation (r:0,82 p < 0.001). The (VDQC-VDWatson) difference was -0.64 +/- 5.8L (ns). Kt/VDC was equivalent to those of eKt/V (1.64 +/- 0.33 and 1.61 +/- 0.26, mean difference -0.02 +/- 0.29). However, Kt/VQC value was higher than eKt/V (1.67 +/- 0.22 and 1.61 +/- 0.26 mean difference 0.06 +/- 0.07 p < 0.01). Both values correlated highly (R2: 0.92 p < 0.001). Urea generation (C) calculated using UCM was 8.75 +/- 3.4 g/24 h and those calculated using QC was 8.64 +/- 3.21 g/24 h. Mean difference 0.10 +/- 1.14 (ns). G calculated by UCM correlated highly with that derived from QC (R2: 0.88 p < 0.001). In conclusion, Kt/VDC and Kt/VQC should be considered as valid measures for dialysis efficiency. However, the limits of agreement between Kt/VQC and eKt/V were closer than Kt/VDC.     

Clinical and microbiological evaluation of a postdilutional hemofiltration system with in-line production of substitution fluid

Safety and efficacy of a recently developed hemofiltration (HF) system with in-line production of substitution fluid (GHS-10; Gambro, Lund, Sweden) based on a sterilizing filtration of acetate buffered dialysate has been evaluated in 4 patients over a 6-month period. Two patients were prematurely excluded from the study: 1 because of acetate intolerance and the other because of kidney transplantation. Two patients completed the study (240 HF sessions). Treatment adequacy was maintained in the 2 medium term treated patients according to the usual clinical and biochemical criteria and a mean exchange volume of 100-105 liters/week (30-35 liters/session three times weekly). Urea kinetic modeling analysis performed over all HF cycles gave the following results: dialysis index (urea clearance.time-on HF/urea volume space) (KT/V) approximately 1-1.1, urea time averaged concentration (UREA TAC) approximately 15-20 mmol/l, and protein catabolic rate (PCR) approximately 1.1-1.2 g/kg/day. Rare clinical adverse symptoms observed during the course of sessions were attributed to acetate intolerance. Microbiological safety was confirmed in vivo by the absence of pyrogenic reactions after 240 HF sessions (approximately 7 m3 substitution fluid infused intravenously) and in vitro by the constant absence of bacteria and/or endotoxin content limulus amaebocyte lysate (LAL) sensibility threshold 10 pg/l within the infusate produced during the sham HF sessions. The fluid mass balance obtained with the GHS-10 monitor was excellent. The electrolyte composition as judged by Na variation remained in a range of 2-3%. GHS-10 used in this study for postdilutional HF confirms that a large quantity of intravenous quality fluid may be safely produced by ultrafiltration from dialysate. It also introduced a new dimension in biocompatibility of dialysis by demonstrating that sterile dialysate may be routinely produced and used for routine dialysis.     

Comparison of the effects of cellulose triacetate and polysulfone membrane on GPIIb/IIIa and platelet activation

BACKGROUND: During hemodialysis session, several adverse reactions can occur on platelets, which are attributable to bioincompatibility of the dialysis membrane. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) is the receptor for fibrinogen, which mediates platelet aggregation and adhesion. Accordingly, we compared the influence of a cellulose triacetate (CTA) and polysulfone (PS) membrane on GPIIb/IIIa and platelet activation. METHODS: Blood samples from 5 patients on hemodialysis were taken at 0 time, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min and 240 min, during a single hemodialysis session, by a crossover design using CTA or PS. Platelet count and plasma concentration of GPIIb/IIIa, beta-thromboglobulin (beta-TG) and platelet factor 4 (PF-4) were measured. GPIIb/IIIa was measured by flow cytometry. beta-TG and PF-4 were measured by ELISA. RESULTS: There was no significant change in the total amount of GPIIb/IIIa during dialysis session between the CTA and PS. However, the level of bound GPIIb/IIIa was significantly (p < 0.0002) increased from 1,426 +/- 435 to 40,446 +/- 2,777 mol/PLT with PS. In contrast, there was no significant change with CTA (3,258 +/- 1,469 to 4,301 +/- 1,422 mol/PLT). The platelet counts and beta-TG and PF-4 behavior during the dialysis session did not show significant change between the PS and CTA. CONCLUSION: The characterization of changes in platelet membrane receptor (GPIIb/IIIa) may be a useful marker for studying the biocompatibility of dialysis membranes. On platelet aggregation, CTA might be more biocompatible membrane than PS.     

Pulse push/pull hemodialysis in a canine renal failure model

A new dialysis modality was devised to increase convective mass transfer. Blood and dialysate are circulated by a pulsatile pump, but with pulsatile flow patterns that are 180 degrees out of phase, which causes blood-to-dialysate pressure gradients to oscillate between positive and negative. In the present study, hemodialytic performance of the devised modality was investigated using a canine renal failure model. Membrane hydraulic permeabilities (K(uf)) and fiber bundle volumes (FBV) were measured after each dialysis session. Postdialysis K(uf) and FBV were then compared with those with conventional high-flux hemodialysis. No complications concerning animals or technical problems with the devised modality were encountered. Urea and creatinine reductions were satisfactory. Postdialysis K(uf) and FBV values were significantly reduced after hemodialysis sessions, but were higher for the new modality. The devised modality incorporated with blood and dialysate pulsation offers a simple but safe means new mode of hemodialysis.     

Reduced cytokine induction and removal of complement products with synthetic hemodialysis membranes

The increasing use of high-flux membranes for hemodialysis (HD) has raised concerns that these membranes may confer a higher risk of exposure to cytokine-inducing, bacterial substances (CIS) in the dialysate. Several studies, however, reported higher transfer of CIS through low-flux cellulosic than high-flux synthetic membranes. This surprising paradox was explained by adsorption of CIS to certain high-flux membranes. In order to investigate flux and membrane type independently, we studied two synthetic Polyflux (PF) membranes of the same type but with different flux properties and compared them to a cellulosic membrane (Cuprophan). Three different approaches were employed: (1) cytokine induction in whole blood during in vitro HD contaminated with bacterial filtrates, (2) removal of recombinant C5a, and (3) transfer of purified lipopolysaccharide (LPS). After 90 min recirculation of whole blood, the appearance of IL-6-inducing substances on the blood side was lowest with high-flux PF (1.1 +/- 0.2 ng/ml), slightly higher with low-flux PF (1.9 +/- 0.7 ng/ml) and highest with Cuprophan (4.1 +/- 1 ng/ml). Recombinant C5a added to plasma on the blood side was markedly removed by high-flux PF (by 83%), to a lesser degree and only in the presence of ultrafiltration with low-flux PF (by 54%) and not significantly with Cuprophan (by 11%). Significant transfer of purified LPS from the dialysate onto the blood side was only observed with the cellulosic membrane. We conclude that in contrast to cellulosic membranes, certain synthetic membranes do not permit transfer of LPS. Cytokine induction on the blood side is further reduced by the use of high-flux membranes due to removal of activated complement factors.