Repetitive high-dose topotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell support in previously untreated ovarian cancer: results of a Phase I study

OBJECTIVE: In view of the significant activity of topotecan in ovarian cancer with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of myelosuppression, we evaluated the addition of topotecan to carboplatin and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer with macroscopic residual disease following primary debulking surgery were eligible. Patients received two cycles of carboplatin AUC = 5 and 175 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel with collection of PBPCs after the second cycle. Patients subsequently received three cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT) with topotecan on a daily x5 schedule, paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2) over 24 h), and carboplatin (AUC = 12-16). RESULTS: Nineteen patients with a median age of 49 years (range 21-63) were enrolled and topotecan was escalated in 6 patient cohorts up to a dose of 4.5 mg/m(2)/day. Fifty-two of the planned 57 treatment cycles were delivered with no treatment-related deaths. Neutrophil and platelet recovery was rapid and the interval between HDT was 28 days. Febrile neutropenia occurred following 57% of all HDT cycles. DLTs of mucositis and diarrhea were observed at topotecan (4.5 mg/m(2)/day), paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 12). The protocol was subsequently modified to administer topotecan (2.5 mg/m(2)/day) with carboplatin (AUC = 16); however, 2 patients developed grade 4 diarrhea (1 with grade 3 mucositis and 1 with grade 4 mucositis). The clinical CR rate was 73% (14/19) with an overall clinical response rate of 95% (18/19). Of the 14 patients with a CCR, 13 of these underwent a second-look laparotomy with 8 (61%) achieving a pathological CR. With a median follow-up of 28 months (range 11-40 months), the median PFS is 36 months and OS has not been reached. CONCLUSION: When combined with carboplatin (AUC = 12) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)), the recommended topotecan dose is 3.5 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days. This outpatient HDT regimen combines three of the most active drugs in ovarian cancer with acceptable toxicity and promising activity.     

Phase I study of alternating doublets of topotecan/carboplatin and paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate topotecan with carboplatin in an alternating doublet with carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer were studied. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan (cycles 1, 3, 5, 7) in an alternating doublet regimen was determined through standard dose escalation in cohorts of three; doses of carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 4 to 5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2), cycles 2, 4, 6, 8) were fixed. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined only for cycle 1 as febrile neutropenia, prolonged grade 4 granulocytopenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, > or =grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity, or failure to recover in < or =7 days. The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was also studied. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received 142 cycles of topotecan/carboplatin. Hematologic DLTs included grade 4 neutropenia (59 events, 42% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia (32 events, 23% of cycles). Granulocytopenia was generally short-lived, and only 2 cases of febrile neutropenia occurred. The MTD was 1.0 mg/m(2)/day topotecan and carboplatin AUC 4, alternating with 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel and carboplatin AUC 4. Although G-CSF effectively managed myelosuppression, thrombocytopenia developed in later cycles, limiting further topotecan dose escalation. The median progression-free survival was 20.5 months, and elevated pretreatment CA-125 levels normalized in 29 of 34 (85%) patients. CONCLUSION: The establishment of a reasonably well-tolerated alternating doublet regimen, coupled with evidence of antitumor activity, provides the basis for further investigation of topotecan in first-line therapy of ovarian cancer. Topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2) daily for 3 days) was chosen for further evaluation in a phase II study.     

A phase II trial of three sequential doublets for the treatment of advanced müllerian malignancies

OBJECTIVES: In an effort to improve the results of primary chemotherapy for müllerian malignancies a novel chemotherapy program was piloted that delivered three sequential chemotherapy doublets. The primary endpoints were surgically defined response rates and evaluation of toxicity. METHODS: After primary cytoreductive surgery patients were treated with three sequential doublets including three initial cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel (doublet 1) and then two cycles of cisplatin (day 1) and gemcitabine (days 1 and 8; doublet 2), and finally two cycles of doxorubicin (day 1) and topotecan (days 3,4, and 5; doublet 3). Cycles 4 through 7 were given with G-CSF (Neupogen) support at a dose of 5 mcg/kg/day. After therapy, all women were clinically staged and evaluated by second-look laparoscopy/laparotomy (SLO) if clinical staging was negative for residual disease. RESULTS: A total of 49 eligible patients were enrolled with a median age of 52 (SD 9). Forty-four women had either ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal carcinoma with 3 women diagnosed with fallopian tube carcinoma and 2 with papillary serous carcinoma of the uterus. Eighty-four percent of patients had stage IIIc/IV tumors, with 29% having >1 cm residual disease after primary cytoreductive surgery. Thirty-nine of 49 (80%) patients completed therapy. A total of 283 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered with acceptable toxicities. There were no toxic deaths. Five women were withdrawn from trial (3 for Taxol hypersensitivity, 1 for gemcitabine pulmonary hypersensitivity, and 1 for serious line infection). Neutropenia, typically without fever, was relatively frequent in the first doublet. Nausea and thrombocytopenia were the predominant toxicities in doublet 2. Thirty-nine women completed all cycles of treatment. Thirty-six women had restaging results consistent with a clinical complete response (CR) and underwent SLO. The pathologic CR rate of the patients undergoing SLO was 38%. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with this sequential doublet regimen is feasible with a 38% pathologic CR rate.     

A phase I/II trial of weekly topotecan and carboplatin in potentially platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Topotecan and carboplatin are active in relapsed ovarian cancer, but attempts to combine these agents are limited by myelotoxicity. This phase I/II trial combined weekly topotecan, which is less myelosuppressive than the standard 5-day regimen, with carboplatin in patients with potentially platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma (PS-OVCa/PCa). METHODS: Eligible patients had PS-OVCa/PCa, performance status 0-2, and normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic functions. On day 1 of a 21-day cycle, patients received carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 5) followed by topotecan 2.0 mg/m2, both via 30-min intravenous infusion. Topotecan 2.0 mg/m2 also was administered on days 8 and 15. Treatment was withheld for neutropenia or thrombocytopenia on day 8 or 15. Dose escalation was planned. RESULTS: Seventeen patients received a total of 115 (median, 6) cycles of chemotherapy. With carboplatin AUC 4, neutropenia prevented dose escalation of topotecan; hematologic toxicity caused 34/105 (32%) weekly treatments to be withheld. However, carboplatin could be dose escalated to AUC 5 when the day 15 dose of topotecan was withheld. In the intent-to-treat population, there were 4 (24%) complete and 9 (53%) partial responses, 2 (12%) patients (at the carboplatin AUC 4 dose) with stable disease, and 2 (12%) nonevaluable patients. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin (AUC 5) on day 1 in combination with topotecan 2.0 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle is well tolerated and active in patients with PS-OVCa/PCa. A phase II trial comparing this with other carboplatin therapeutic doublets in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer is warranted.     

Phase I feasibility trial of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine in patients with previously untreated epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of administering a minimum of four cycles of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine (CPG) every 21 days without excessive dose modification or cycle delay in patients with previously untreated epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal cancer. METHODS: Paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) was given over 3 h followed by carboplatin concentration time curve (AUC) 5 (day 1) and gemcitabine 1 g/m(2) (days 1 and 8) in the first cohort. A second cohort received paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) over 3 h followed by carboplatin AUC 5 (day 1) and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8). A maximum of eight cycles was administered. RESULTS: Fourteen patients received 89 cycles during the first cohort. Seven patients experienced 19 hematologic dose-limiting events (DLEs) within the first four cycles, including grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n = 9), febrile neutropenia (n = 3), and omission of gemcitabine on day 8 (n = 7). This exceeded the threshold for nonfeasibility. In the second, less intense regimen, 36 patients were entered. Thirty-one evaluable patients received a total of 200 and median of 6 (range: 2-8) cycles. Thirteen of the thirty-one had 27 DLEs within the first four cycles including grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n = 5), prolonged grade 4 neutropenia (n = 2), febrile neutropenia (n = 2), and omission of day 8 gemcitabine (n = 18). There was one patient death secondary to a wound abscess and febrile neutropenia. Myelosuppression as expected was the dose-limiting toxicity. CONCLUSION: The schedule of paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) (day 1, 3 h), carboplatin AUC 5 (day 1), and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) is feasible, with an acceptable toxicity profile.     

A phase II clinical trial of topotecan and carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

A phase II clinical trial conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topotecan and carboplatin as first-line therapy for women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer was the objective of this study. Patients had histologically confirmed ovarian epithelial cancer with at least one measurable lesion. Patients received topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2) on days 1-3 and carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 on day 3 every 21 days for six cycles. All 42 patients enrolled were evaluable for response and toxicity. Median number of cycles delivered was six. Overall response rate was 71%, with 19 clinical complete responses (45%) and 11 clinical partial responses (26%). Median survival time was 47 months and 5-year survival was 42%. Myelosuppression was the predominant toxicity, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 100% of patients. However, this toxicity was transient and easily manageable; no patients experienced febrile neutropenia. The combination of topotecan and carboplatin is active in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Delay of therapy by 1 week or topotecan dose reduction to 1.25 mg/m(2) is the first-choice option to reduce topotecan toxicity without affecting the efficacy. Moreover, a chemotherapy regimen using weekly topotecan, which is currently being tested, should be considered.     

Experience with single-agent paclitaxel consolidation following primary chemotherapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine in advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: Twelve cycles of single-agent paclitaxel have been demonstrated to prolong progression-free survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer whom achieved a clinical complete response to a primary platinum/paclitaxel chemotherapy regimen. This trial was conducted to compare the toxicity and disease-free interval of 3 cycles vs. 12 cycles of paclitaxel consolidation in patients treated with an intensive three-drug front-line regimen of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine. METHODS: Following cytoreductive surgery, 26 ovarian cancer patients received primary chemotherapy with carboplatin (AUC = 5, day 1), paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h, day 1), and gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2), day 1 day 8), with treatment repeated every 21 days x 6 cycles. The first 13 patients (group A) received three additional cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days). The second set of 13 patients (group B) also received three cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days) and then received nine additional cycles of paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days) consolidation therapy. The change from 3 cycles to 12 cycles of consolidation therapy for group B was made following the published results of GOG 178. RESULTS: In group A, all 13 patients completed three courses of consolidation therapy. One patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia and two patients exhibited both grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Grade > or = 2 neuropathy developed in 3 patients (23%). In group B, 9 of the 13 patients whom were intended to receive 12 total cycles of paclitaxel consolidation were able to complete the program. There was no grade 3-4 neutropenia or anemia in this population, although 1 patient developed grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Grade > or = 2 neuropathy developed in 7 patients (54%). Although not a randomized experience, median progression-free interval was 76 weeks for group B, and 47 weeks for group A. CONCLUSION: Single-agent paclitaxel consolidation therapy can be administered for 12 cycles following first-line carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine induction therapy, but there is considerable risk for development of a moderately severe peripheral neuropathy.     

A phase I study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in relapsed ovarian cancer

This phase I study sought to determine the toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of giving carboplatin every 3 weeks and paclitaxel weekly in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Eligible patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer and prior treatment with platinum- and paclitaxel-based therapy were treated with an escalating regimen of carboplatin (day 1) at an area under the curve (AUC) of 4-6 and 1-h infusions of paclitaxel (days 1, 8, and 15) at 50-80 mg/m(2) cycled at 3-week intervals. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on the first day of cycles 1 and 2. All patients had a platinum-free interval of greater than 6 months from the most recent platinum treatment. A total of 77 cycles were administered to 16 patients, with a similar median number of cycles per patient at each dose level varying from 4.6 to 5.3. Febrile neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities at dose levels 3 and 4 after the third cycle, with no mucositis, nausea, vomiting, or peripheral neuropathy observed greater than grade 2. The maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin was an AUC of 5 and 80 mg/m(2) for paclitaxel. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a marginal statistical difference with regard to reduced systemic paclitaxel concentration after cycle 2 compared with cycle 1 (P= 0.06). Of nine patients evaluable for a radiographic response, the response rate was 66.6% with a complete response of 33.3%. All five patients with nonmeasurable disease achieved a biochemical response. The combination of carboplatin given every 3 weeks at an AUC of 5 and 1-h weekly paclitaxel at 80 mg/m(2) is a feasible and reasonably well-tolerated regimen and may have significant antitumor activity in relapsed ovarian cancer patients.     

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin as first line therapy for patients with suboptimally debulked, advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. A phase II trial of sequential doublets. The GO-First Study

OBJECTIVES: Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin are active in epithelial ovarian cancer with minimal overlapping toxicity. We studied the efficacy and toxicity of this combination in patients with advanced ovarian cancer when given prior to carboplatin and paclitaxel. METHODS: Chemonaive patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and measurable disease were eligible for the study. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 8 every 21 days (GO) for 4 cycles. This was followed by carboplatin AUC = 6 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1 every 21 days (CP) for 4 cycles. RESULTS: Twenty patients, median age 62 years (range 39-78), FIGO stages III (16) and IV (4) received treatment. The response rate (RR) after 4 cycles of GO was 80% (95%CI 61-99%) (4 complete responses (CR), 12 partial responses (PR)). Interval debulking surgery was performed in 7 patients (35%). After CP chemotherapy, RR increased to 85% (95%CI 68-100%) (CR = 13, PR = 4). Median time to progression was 14.5 months. Estimated median overall survival was 31.5 months. Toxicities of GO were mild; grade 3/4 nausea in 3 patients (15%) and vomiting in 2 patients (10%), grade 3/4 neutropenia in 5 patients (25%). Grade 2/3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 5 patients (25%). After sequential administration of CP, grade 2/3 neuropathy occurred in 13 patients (72%). CONCLUSION: The sequential doublet regimen of GO followed by CP resulted in unacceptable neurotoxicity and is not recommended for further study; however, the doublet gemcitabine and oxaliplatin has significant activity in the first line treatment of patients with ovarian cancer.     

Phase II study of carboplatin followed by sequential gemcitabine and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer

The aim of this exploratory phase II study was to evaluate sequential chemotherapy with carboplatin followed by gemcitabine-paclitaxel combination in chemonaive patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The primary objective was to evaluate time to progressive disease (TTPD); secondary objectives included the evaluation of 1- and 3-year survival, response rates, and toxicity. Following initial debulking surgery or biopsy, patients with FIGO stage IIC-IV disease received four cycles of carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 (day 1) every 21 days, followed by four cycles of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (day 8) every 21 days. A total of 47 patients enrolled, 44 (93.6%) completed the initial four cycles, and 39 patients (82.9%) completed the planned eight cycles. The median and maximum lengths of follow-up were 31.2 and 43.7 months, respectively. Median TTPD was 13.8 months (95% CI, 11.6-21.0 months), and median survival time was 31.2 months (95% CI, 25.2-39.6 months). Survival at 1 and 3 years was 95.7% and 44.2%, respectively. Of the 43 evaluable patients, most (95.3%) of them achieved a CA-125 marker response based on Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) definition. The partial response rate in the seven patients with measurable disease was 46.4%. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia observed in 76.6% patients and thrombocytopenia in 12.8% patients. The sequential approach of carboplatin followed by gemcitabine-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with ovarian cancer is feasible and well tolerated, and depending upon the findings from other major trials, it may merit further evaluation.     

Response and toxicity to topotecan in sensitive ovarian cancer cases with small residual disease after first-line treatment with carboplatinum and paclitaxel

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this open uncontrolled study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of topotecan in ovarian cancer cases with microscopic small residual disease to a first-line treatment, given as sequential treatment, including carboplatinum and paclitaxel. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were laparotomically or laparoscopically documented microscopic or macroscopic (<2 cm) residual disease after first-line chemotherapy including carboplatinum plus paclitaxel in patients with histologically documented epithelial ovarian cancer FIGO stage III or IV at first diagnosis. All patients had a response >50% after first-line treatment. Eligible patients received 1.25 mg/m(2)/day of topotecan intravenously as a 30-min infusion for 5 consecutive days every 21 days for four cycles. A total of 38 women entered the study. Surgical "third-look" laparotomy or laparoscopy was performed in patients without clinical/instrumental evidence of progressive disease within 1 month from the last topotecan administration. RESULTS: A complete response was observed in 10 cases (28.6%, 95% confidence interval, based on the Poisson's approximation, 15.6-59. 5), a partial response in 1 (2.5%), progressive disease in 11 (31. 4%) and no change/stable disease in 13. The median duration of response was 8 months (range 5-20). The overall 1-year survival after treatment was 82.8% (SE 6.4). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that sequential therapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel followed by topotecan, all given at standard doses, is feasible and provides favorable response rates.     

A phase I study with an expanded cohort to assess the feasibility of intravenous paclitaxel, intraperitoneal carboplatin and intraperitoneal paclitaxel in patients with untreated ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Objective

To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess the feasibility of intravenous (IV) paclitaxel, intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin, and IP paclitaxel in women with newly diagnosed Stages II-IV ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Methods

Patients received escalating doses of paclitaxel IV and carboplatin IP on day 1 and paclitaxel IP 60 mg/m² on day 8. A standard 3 + 3 design was used in the escalation phase. A two-stage group sequential design with 20 patients at the MTD was used in the feasibility phase. Patient-reported neurotoxicity was assessed pre and post treatment.

Results

Patients were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m² IV and carboplatin IP from AUC 5-7 on day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² IP on day 8. The MTD was estimated at carboplatin AUC 6 IP and 25 patients enrolled at this dose level. Within the first 4 cycles, seven (35%) of twenty evaluable patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) including grade 4 thrombocytopenia (1), grade 3 neutropenic fever (3), > 2 week delay due to ANC recovery (1), grade 3 LFT (1), and grade 3 infection (1). De-escalation to paclitaxel 135 mg/m² IV was given to improve the safety. After six evaluable patients completed 4 cycles without a DLT, bevacizumab was added and six evaluable patients completed 4 cycles with one DLT (grade 3 hyponatremia).

Conclusions

Paclitaxel at 175 mg/m² IV, carboplatin AUC 6 IP day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² IP day 8 yield 18-56% patients with DLTs. The tolerability of the regimen in combination with bevacizumab was indicated in a small cohort.     

Dose-dense chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and 3-weekly carboplatin for recurrent ovarian cancer

ObjectiveTo analyze the response to dose-dense chemotherapy of weekly paclitaxel and 3-weekly carboplatin in recurrent ovarian cancer, and to report results of literature review.Materials and methodsPatients accepted weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m² on day 1, 8, 15 and carboplatin on day1 at area under curve (AUC) 6 every 21 days were reviewed for the response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity during January 2012 to April 2016 in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taiwan.ResultsSixteen patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, including 1 platinum-resistant, 7 partially platinum-sensitive, and 8 platinum-sensitive, accepted a median of 6 cycles of chemotherapy (range 3–10). The overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate were 93.8%, and 62.5%, respectively. The median PFS of all patients were 10.9 months (range 4.3–40.5). The median time to response (TTR) was 29.0 days (range 19.6–38.4). The median disease-free survival (DFS) after CR was 5.6 months (range 1.2–34.2). Grade 3 at least toxicity included anemia (6.3%), neutropenia (50%), and thrombocytopenia (18.8%).Twenty-nine articles on phase I, II, III, or retrospective studies of dose-dense chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel were reviewed.ConclusionThis is the first report using Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group 3016 protocol, weekly paclitaxel and 3-weely carboplatin, on recurrent ovarian cancer. The current study showed high ORR and CR with tolerable toxicities. Our study suggested dose-dense chemotherapy with paclitaxel, especially combining carboplatin created high efficacy probably by anti-angiogenesis. However, consolidation or maintenance therapy is needed to prolong DFS.     

Phase I/II study of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin and gemcitabine as first-line treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer: pathologic complete response and longitudinal assessment of impact on cognitive functioning

BACKGROUND: To determine the pathologic complete response rate of advanced ovarian cancer to weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and carboplatin with filgrastim, and assess the longitudinal impact of this regimen on quality-of-life and cognitive functioning. METHODS: Fourteen patients with advanced ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer were treated in the phase I portion of the study. Initial doses were paclitaxel: 60 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, and 15; gemcitabine: 800 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; and carboplatin: area under the curve (AUC) 5 day 1, every 21 days for 6 cycles with filgrastim. Twenty-seven patients were treated at the phase II dose. Pathologic response was assessed by second-look laparoscopy in patients with complete response. Patients completed longitudinal assessments of quality-of-life and cognitive functioning. RESULTS: Maximally tolerated doses were paclitaxel: 80 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; gemcitabine: 800 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; and carboplatin: AUC 5 day 1, every 21 days. Forty-eight percent of patients (13/27) experienced at least 1 grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity. Fifty percent (95% confidence interval [CI], 31-69%) of assessable patients achieved pathologic complete response. Median progression-free survival was 27.3 months (95% CI, 17.7 months to not reached), and overall survival 43.6 months (95% CI, 42 months to not reached). Cognitive functioning did not decline during or after chemotherapy. More highly educated women reported a perceived decline in concentration and memory while on chemotherapy. Quality-of-life scores were maintained during therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Fifty percent of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer achieved pathologic complete response to weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and carboplatin. Cognitive functioning did not decline by objective measures, although highly educated women reported subjective impairment.     

The addition of topotecan to carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced ovarian cancer; is it possible only with peripheral blood stem cell support?

A phase I study was performed in order to evaluate the tolerability of the combination of fixed doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel and escalated doses of topotecan as first line chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Three stage III and one stage IV patients entered the study. The dose limiting toxicity (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) was reached at the first dose level: paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1, carboplatin AUC 5 on day I and topotecan 0.5 mg/m2 daily from day 1 to day 3. We conclude that it is not possible to add topotecan to standard regimens of carboplatin and paclitaxel without bone marrow support.     

Topotecan as a second-line therapy in patients with ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer: initial response and long-term follow-up

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of topotecan at a dose of 5-day standard 1.5 mg/m2/day in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Two different groups of patients were included. In group 1, 23 patients who had bidemensionally measurable disease were examined, and in group 2, 11 patients were given topotecan after positive second-look laparotomy (SLL) were analyzed. Total number of cycles was 190 with a median value of six cycles. In group 1, three (13%) patients had complete response (CR) and seven (30%) had partial response (PR) with a total response rate of 43%. Six patients (27%) had stable disease (SD), and seven (30%) had progressive disease (PD). Median survival durations for patients with CR, PR, SD, and PD were 35, 14, 15, and two months, respectively. In group 2, two patients had PD during treatment. The remaining nine patients had no measurable disase or marker relapse at the end of treatment period. Median survival duration was 27 months. In conclusion, topotecan had significant antitumor activity as a second-line therapy in relapsed ovarian cancer patients with measurable disease. In a subgroup of patients with positive second-look laparotomy topotecan was also associated with long median survival duration.     

Paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy in a hemodialysis patient with advanced ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: There are few reports on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel combined with carboplatin or on the dose schedule of carboplatin in combination use during hemodialysis in patients with ovarian cancer. CASE: A 40-year-old woman with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis who had FIGO stage III ovarian cancer was treated with debulking surgery and carboplatin/paclitaxel combination chemotherapy. Paclitaxal was administered at 150 mg/m(2) as a 3-h intravenous infusion followed by a 30-min infusion of carboplatin on a nondialysis day. The carboplatin dose was chosen to produce a target area under the concentration/time curve (AUC) of 5.0 microg-min/ml according to the Calvert formula. The pharmacokinetic study showed that the AUCs of free platinum and paclitaxel were 4.43 microg-min/ml and 15.9 microg-h/ml, respectively. Dosing of carboplatin based on the AUC produced an acceptable degree of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. After the completion of five cycles of the combination chemotherapy, the tumor showed complete response, and the patient remained disease free for 8 months. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy can be given to patients undergoing hemodialysis, with dialysis performed 16 h after the administration and with a dose adjustment of carboplatin to reach a target AUC. In these conditions, tumor response can be obtained.     

Second-line with paclitaxel and carboplatin for recurrent disease following first paclitaxel and platinum compounds in ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: The combination of paclitaxel and platinum compounds is considered the best first-line regimen for advanced ovarian carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a paclitaxel and carboplatin combination in pretreated patients who recurred within 24 months after a complete clinical response with the same regimen used as first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: 18 patients were included in this study. Second-line chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion, and carboplatin AUC 6 every 21 days. RESULTS: Among 15 evaluable patients, eight (53%) complete and five (34%) partial responses were observed, while two (13%) patients had stable disease (SD). The response rate was 67% among patients with measurable disease and 52% for evaluable disease. The median progression-free interval after second-line chemotherapy was 8.3 months. The median progression-free interval for patients with measurable disease was 8.6 months and for evaluable disease it was 7.9 months. Seven (46%) of 15 patients have developed recurrence after second-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin with a median time to recurrence of 9.8 months. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 6 as second-line chemotherapy in this sensitive population is effective in terms of response rate and progression-free interval.     

Sequence dependence of hematologic toxicity using carboplatin and topotecan for primary therapy of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase I study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE: Selection of a feasible sequence and schedule of carboplatin in combination with topotecan for evaluation in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with stages III-IV EOC or primary peritoneal carcinoma without prior chemotherapy were assigned to consecutive cohorts evaluating a "forward" (carboplatin day 1, topotecan days 1-3), "reverse" (carboplatin day 3, topotecan days 1-3), or "extended reverse" sequence (carboplatin day 5, topotecan days 1-5). Patients received 4 cycles carboplatin-topotecan followed by 4 cycles carboplatin-paclitaxel. Feasibility was defined according to the cumulative proportion of patients with dose-limiting events (DLEs) during the first four cycles. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled across 5 cohorts. The forward sequence demonstrated unacceptable hematologic DLEs at the lowest topotecan dose (0.75 mg/m2/day x 3 days). The reverse sequence was feasible at 1.25 mg/m2/day x 3 days, with only 1/15 patients experiencing a DLE within 4 cycles, and 14/15 patients were able to receive 4 subsequent cycles of carboplatin-paclitaxel. The extended reverse sequence was associated with excessive DLEs at 1.00 mg/m2/day x 5 days. Prophylactic hematopoietic growth factors were not required. CONCLUSION: Higher doses of topotecan could be safely administered with reduced toxicity over multiple cycles using the reverse sequence, which was selected for phase III evaluation. The relative efficacy of the forward and reverse sequence is unknown.     

A phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel and every 3 weeks of carboplatin in potentially platinum-sensitive ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Paclitaxel administered weekly in equal cumulative doses is associated with less hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity than an every 3-week administration. We studied weekly paclitaxel and 3-week carboplatin in potentially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma. METHODS: Paclitaxel at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) over 1 h in combination with carboplatin at an AUC of 5 was administered on day 1. Subsequent paclitaxel doses, modified based on the day of treatment ANC, were administered on days 8 and 15. Paclitaxel dose reductions to 75% of prior dose were performed for chemotherapy delays or toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were studied. The median age was 59 (range 42-80). The median platinum-free interval was 12 months (range 7-129 months). A median of six courses (range 1-13) was administered. Paclitaxel dose reductions to 60 mg/m(2) were required in 85% of the patients. Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia were seen in 5 and 0 patients, respectively. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia were seen in 14 and 1 patients, respectively. One patient was hospitalized for neutropenic fever. Twenty of 26 (77%) evaluable patients have responded with 15 patients (58%) achieving a complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly paclitaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m(2) in combination with carboplatin at an AUC of 5 is well tolerated and active in potentially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma.