Treatment of Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma After Previous Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy for Localized Disease: A Retrospective Comparison of Different Chemotherapy Regimens

BackgroundOptimal chemotherapy for patients who received cisplatin for localized urothelial carcinoma (UC) and develop metastatic disease is unclear. We compared the efficacy of platinum-based (PBC) versus non–platinum-based (NPBC) first-line chemotherapy for metastasis.Patients and MethodsData were collected from the Retrospective International Study of Cancers of the Urothelial Tract (RISC), a database of 3024 patients from 28 international academic centers from 2005 to 2012. Patient inclusion criteria included: (1) predominant UC; (2) any primary tumor site; (3) cT2-4, cN0-N2, cM0; (4) prior receipt of perioperative/radiation cisplatin-containing chemotherapy; and (5) receipt of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the first-line metastatic setting. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to show progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the first day of chemotherapy for metastatic disease to date of censor.ResultsEligibility criteria was met by 132 patients (n = 74 PBC; n = 58 NPBC). The median OS was 8.13 months (interquartile range, 4.87-16.64 months) and 8.77 months (interquartile range, 4.01-13.49 months) for PBC and NPBC, respectively. Neither OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-1.69; P = .87) nor PFS (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.56-1.31; P = .48) differed for PBC versus NPBC. However, for patients who received chemotherapy more than a year after perioperative/radiation chemotherapy, OS was superior for PBC over NPBC (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10-0.92; P = .03).ConclusionsThere is no significant outcome difference between PBC and NPBC in patients with metastatic UC who previously received cisplatin-based chemotherapy for localized disease. However, if over a year has elapsed, return to PBC is associated with superior OS.     

Efficacy and Safety of Aflibercept in Combination With Chemotherapy Beyond Second-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Patients: An AGEO Multicenter Study

BackgroundAlthough no data have been reported beyond second-line therapy, aflibercept is approved in this setting in many countries. We conducted a multicenter study to analyze the efficacy and safety of a aflibercept–chemotherapy regimen beyond second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Patients and MethodsMetastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with aflibercept beyond second-line therapy were included. Objective response rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed.ResultsA total of 130 patients were included. Median OS and PFS were 7.6 months (95% confidence interval, 6.2-9.3) and 3.3 months (95% confidence interval, 2.7-3.8), respectively. The best response rates were partial response 6.9%, stable disease 38.5%, progressive disease 42.5%, and not evaluable 12%. According to whether patients received previous FOLFIRI (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin)-bevacizumab or not, OS was 7.7 and 8.1 months (P = .31), and PFS was 2.9 and 3.9 months (P = .02), respectively. Interestingly, PFS and OS were both significantly improved by 4% and 5% per month, respectively, without antiangiogenic treatment before the initiation of the aflibercept regimen. The negative effect of prior FOLFIRI–bevacizumab or shorter time since last bevacizumab was maintained in multivariate analysis for both OS and PFS.ConclusionThe aflibercept–chemotherapy regimen is a therapeutic option in patients with chemorefractory disease beyond second-line therapy, in particular in patients with an antiangiogenic-free interval.     

Randomized phase III trial of 2nd line gemcitabine and paclitaxel chemotherapy in patients with advanced bladder cancer: short-term versus prolonged treatment [German Association of Urological Oncology (AUO) trial AB 20/99]

BackgroundThe second-line chemotherapeutic treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) after failure of cisplatin-based first-line therapy needs to be improved. Based on encouraging phase II data of gemcitabine and paclitaxel (Taxol) (GP), this trial was designed to compare a short-term (arm A) versus a prolonged (arm B) second-line combination chemotherapy of GP.Patients and methodsOf 102 randomized patients, 96 were eligible for analysis. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORR) and toxicity.ResultsNeither OS [arm A: 7.8 (95% CI: 4.2–11.4), arm B: 8.0 (95% CI: 4.9–11.1) months] and PFS [arm A: 4.0 (95% CI: 0–8.0), arm B: 3.1 (95% CI: 1.9–4.2) months] nor ORR (arm A: 37.5%, arm B: 41.5%) were significantly different. On prolonged treatment, more patients experienced severe anemia (arm A: 6.7% versus arm B: 26.7% grade III/IV anemia; P = 0.011). In six patients, treatment was stopped during the first cycle due to disease progression or toxicity. Two patients died due to treatment-related toxic effects.ConclusionDue to rapid tumor progression and toxicity at this dosage and schedule in a multicenter setting, it was not feasible to deliver a prolonged regimen. However, a high response rate of ∼40% makes GP a promising second-line treatment option for patients with metastatic UC.     

T-DM1 Efficacy in Patients With HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Progressing After a Taxane Plus Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab: An Italian Multicenter Observational Study

BackgroundT-DM1 improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2⁺) breast cancer progressing on prior trastuzumab plus a taxane. A paucity of data is available on T-DM1 efficacy after dual anti-HER2 blockade with pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus a taxane, which represents the current first-line standard of care. The present study is a retrospective/prospective evaluation of the efficacy and activity of second-line T-DM1 after front-line pertuzumab-based therapy.Patients and MethodsEligible patients were identified within the Gruppo Italiano Mammella (GIM) 14/BIOMETA study, a retrospective/prospective multicenter study on treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with metastatic breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02284581). We searched for patients who received second-line T-DM1 after taxane plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab between November 15, 2013 and May 31, 2018. We calculated median PFS, median time to treatment failure (TTF), prolonged duration of therapy (PDT), objective response rate (ORR), and 1-year OS.ResultsOf 445 patients with HER2⁺ metastatic breast cancer, 77 were eligible for the analysis. At a median follow-up of 7 months, median PFS was 6.3 months (95% confidence intervals [CI], 4.8-7.7 months), and median TTF was 6.2 months (95% CI, 4-8.6 months). More than one-third of patients (37.6%; n = 29) experienced PDT with an ORR of 27.1%. At data cutoff, the median OS was not reached, and the 1-year OS was 82%.ConclusionsOur results show meaningful activity of T-DM1 after front-line pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and a taxane, with about 27% of patients having an objective response and 40% of patients achieving durable disease control.     

Final results of the TANIA randomised phase III trial of bevacizumab after progression on first-line bevacizumab therapy for HER2-negative locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundThe randomised phase III TANIA trial demonstrated that continuing bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy for locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC) after progression on first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy alone [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61–0.93]. We report final results from the TANIA trial, including overall survival (OS) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).Patients and methodsPatients with HER2-negative LR/mBC that had progressed on or after first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy were randomised to receive standard second-line chemotherapy either alone or with bevacizumab. At second progression, patients initially randomised to bevacizumab continued bevacizumab with their third-line chemotherapy, but those randomised to chemotherapy alone were not allowed to cross over to receive third-line bevacizumab. The primary end point was second-line PFS; secondary end points included third-line PFS, combined second- and third-line PFS, OS, HRQoL and safety.ResultsOf the 494 patients randomised, 483 received second-line therapy; 234 patients (47% of the randomised population) continued to third-line study treatment. The median duration of follow-up at the final analysis was 32.1 months in the chemotherapy-alone arm and 30.9 months in the bevacizumab plus chemotherapy arm. There was no statistically significant difference between treatment arms in third-line PFS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.59–1.06), combined second- and third-line PFS (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.68–1.05) or OS (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.76–1.21). Third-line safety results showed increased incidences of proteinuria and hypertension with bevacizumab, consistent with safety results for the second-line treatment phase. No differences in HRQoL were detected.ConclusionsIn this trial, continuing bevacizumab beyond first and second progression of LR/mBC improved second-line PFS, but no improvement in longer term efficacy was observed. The second-line PFS benefit appears to be achieved without detrimentally affecting quality of life.ClinicalTrials.govNCT01250379.     

A Multicenter Retrospective Chart Review of Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With KRAS G12C Mutant Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundOn May 28, 2021, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to sotorasib for second-line or later treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic KRAS G12C mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This was the first FDA-approved targeted therapy for this patient population. Due to a paucity of real world data describing clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced or metastatic KRAS G12C mutated NSCLC in the second-line or later, we sought to compile a large, academic medical center-based historical dataset to clarify clinical outcomes in this patient population.Materials and MethodsThe clinical outcomes of 396 patients with stage IV (n = 268, 68%) or recurrent, metastatic (n = 128, 32%) KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC were evaluated in this multicenter retrospective chart review conducted through the Academic Thoracic Oncology Medical Investigator's Consortium (ATOMIC). Patients treated at 13 sites in the United States and Canada and diagnosed between 2006 and 2020 (30% 2006-2015, 70% 2016-2020) were included. Primary outcomes included real-world PFS (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) from time of stage IV or metastatic diagnosis, with particular interest in patients treated with second-line docetaxel-containing regimens, as well as clinical outcomes in the known presence or absence of STK11 or KEAP1 comutations.ResultsAmong all patients with stage IV or recurrent, metastatic KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC (n = 201 with KRAS G12C confirmed prior to first line systemic therapy), the median first-line rwPFS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.3-11.8 months) and median OS was 16.8 months (95% CI, 12.7-22.3 months). In this historical dataset, first line systemic therapy among these 201 patients included platinum doublet alone (44%), PD-(L)1 inhibitor monotherapy (30%), platinum doublet chemotherapy plus PD-(L)1 inhibitor (18%), and other regimens (8%). Among patients with documented second-line systemic therapy (n = 123), the second-line median rwPFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.1-11.9 months), with median rwPFS 4.6 months (95% CI, 1.4-NA) among 10 docetaxel-treated patients (9 received docetaxel and 1 received docetaxel plus ramucirumab). Within the total study population, 49 patients (12%) had a co-occurring STK11 mutation and 3 (1%) had a co-occurring KEAP1 mutation. Among the 49 patients with a co-occurring KRAS G12C and STK11 mutation, median rwPFS on first-line systemic therapy (n = 23) was 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.7-NA), and median OS was 14.0 months (95% CI, 10.8-35.3 months).ConclusionIn this large, multicenter retrospective chart review of patients with KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC we observed a relatively short median rwPFS of 4.6 months among 10 patients with KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC treated with docetaxel with or without ramucirumab in the second-line setting, which aligns with the recently reported CodeBreak 200 dataset.     

Six-Month Progression-Free Survival as the Primary Endpoint to Evaluate the Activity of New Agents as Second-line Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

ObjectiveSecond-line systemic therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) has substantial unmet needs, and current agents show dismal activity. Second-line trials of metastatic UC have used response rate (RR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) as primary endpoints, which may not reflect durable benefits. A more robust endpoint to identify signals of durable benefits when investigating new agents in second-line trials may expedite drug development. PFS at 6 months (PFS6) is a candidate endpoint, which may correlate with overall survival (OS) at 12 months (OS12) and may be applicable across cytostatic and cytotoxic agents.MethodsTen second-line phase II trials with individual patient outcomes data evaluating chemotherapy or biologics were combined for discovery, followed by external validation in a phase III trial. The relationship between PFS6/RR and OS12 was assessed at the trial level using Pearson correlation and weighted linear regression, and at the individual level using Pearson chi-square test with Yates continuity correction.ResultsIn the discovery dataset, a significant correlation was observed between PFS6 and OS12 at the trial (R² = 0.55, Pearson correlation = 0.66) and individual levels (82%, Қ = 0.45). Response correlated with OS12 at the individual level less robustly (78%, Қ = 0.36), and the trial level association was not statistically significant (R² = 0.16, Pearson correlation = 0.37). The correlation of PFS6 (81%, Қ = 0.44) appeared stronger than the correlation of response (76%, Қ = 0.17) with OS12 in the external validation dataset.ConclusionsPFS6 is strongly associated with OS12 and appears more optimal than RR to identify active second-line agents for advanced UC.     

Phase II randomised trial of autologous tumour lysate dendritic cell plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care in pre-treated advanced colorectal cancer patients

BackgroundAutologous tumour lysate dendritic cell vaccine (ADC) has T-cell stimulatory capacity and, therefore, potential antitumour activity. We designed a phase II randomised trial of ADC + best supportive care (BSC) (experimental arm [EA]) compared with BSC (control arm [CA]), in pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.Patients and methodsPatients with progressive mCRC, at least to two chemotherapy regimens and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0–2, were randomised to EA versus CA. Stratification criteria: ECOG PS (0–1 versus 2) and lactate dehydrogenase (<Upper Limit of Normal [ULN] versus >ULN). EA was administered subcutaneously till progressive disease. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months.ResultsFifty-two patients were included (28 EA/24 CA). An interim analysis recommended early termination for futility. No objective radiological response was observed in EA. Median PFS in EA was 2.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3–3.2 months) versus 2.3 months (95% CI, 2.1–2.5 months) in CA (p = 0.628). Median overall survival (OS) was 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.4–7.9 months) in EA versus 4.7 months (95% CI, 2.3–7 months) in CA (p = 0.41). No ADC-related adverse events were reported. Immunization induces tumour-specific T-cell response in 21 of 25 (84%) patients. Responder patients have an OS of 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.2–9.4 months) versus 3.8 months (95% CI, 0.6–6.9 months) in non-responders; p = 0.026).ConclusionOur randomised clinical trial comparing ADC + BSC versus BSC in mCRC demonstrates that ADC generates a tumour-specific immune response but not benefit on PFS and OS. Our results do not support the use of ADC alone, in a phase III trial.     

Phase II Trial of Combination Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine in Non–squamous Non–small Cell Lung Cancer After Progression on Platinum and Pemetrexed

BackgroundBetter therapies are needed to improve survival in metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the synergy of combination nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer and their individual activity in advanced NSCLC, we sought to determine whether the same combination would confer a therapeutic benefit in the second-line therapy of recurrent or metastatic non–squamous (NSQ) NSCLC.Materials and MethodsThis single-arm phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine was performed from June 2015 to April 2020 at an academic referral cancer center. Patients with advanced NSQ-NSCLC whose disease progressed on first-line pemetrexed plus platinum +/- immunotherapy were enrolled. Patients received intravenous nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m² and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety and tolerability were evaluated by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.ResultsThirty-seven patients (15 men [41%] and 22 women [59%]; median age, 66 years [range, 41-81 years]) were accrued. ORR was 13.5% (95% CI, 2.5-24.5%). DCR was 59.5% (95% CI, 43.5-75.5%). Median PFS was 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.4-3.8 months). Median OS was 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.2-8.2 months). 1-year OS was 24% (95% CI, 10-38%). Safety and tolerability were similar to other second-line chemotherapies, although there was an 11% incidence of grade 2-3 pneumonitis.ConclusionCombination nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine after platinum and pemetrexed for NSQ-NSCLC was not associated with greater efficacy than would be expected for single-agent chemotherapy in this setting. The higher-than-expected risk of pneumonitis was also concerning.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02303977Micro-AbstractIn this phase II trial, 37 patients with metastatic non–squamous non–small cell lung cancer were treated with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine in second-line. ORR = 13.5% (95% CI, 2.5%-24.5%). Median PFS = 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.4-3.8 months). Median OS = 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.2-8.2 months). Nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine was not associated with greater efficacy than would be expected for single-agent chemotherapy in this setting.     

A Randomized,Placebo-Controlled Trial of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Squamous NSCLC: Protocol-Specified Final Analysis of KEYNOTE-407

IntroductionIn the randomized KEYNOTE-407 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02775435), pembrolizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel (chemotherapy) significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated metastatic squamous NSCLC. We report updated efficacy outcomes from the protocol-specified final analysis and, for the first time, progression on next line of treatment.MethodsEligible patients were randomized to chemotherapy plus either pembrolizumab (n = 278) or placebo (n = 281). After positive results from the second interim analysis, patients still receiving placebo could cross over to pembrolizumab monotherapy at the time of confirmed progressive disease. The primary end points were OS and PFS. PFS-2 (time from randomization to progression on next-line treatment/death, whichever occurred first) was an exploratory end point.ResultsAfter median (range) follow-up of 14.3 (0.1–31.3) months, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy continued to exhibit a clinically meaningful improvement over placebo plus chemotherapy in OS (median, 17.1 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.4‒19.9] versus 11.6 mo [95% CI: 10.1‒13.7]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI: 0.58‒0.88]) and PFS (median, 8.0 mo [95% CI: 6.3‒8.4] versus 5.1 mo [95% CI: 4.3‒6.0]; HR, 0.57 [95% CI: 0.47‒0.69]). PFS-2 was longer for patients randomized to first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (HR, 0.59 [95% CI: 0.49‒0.72]). Grade 3 to 5 adverse events occurred in 74.1% and 69.6% of patients receiving pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and placebo plus chemotherapy, respectively.ConclusionsPembrolizumab plus chemotherapy continued to exhibit substantially improved OS and PFS in patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC. The PFS-2 outcomes support pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as a standard first-line treatment in patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC.     

High response of second-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed or gemcitabine combined with carboplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer experiencing progression following 6 months after concluding platinum-based chemotherapy

Because of improved therapeutic results after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), second-line chemotherapy may be considered for a growing number of patients. Approximately, 10% of patients have an interval time after concluding first-line platinum-based chemotherapy greater than 6 months. These patients may achieve high tumor responses when platinum is again used in second-line treatment. Twenty-three patients experiencing progression following 6 months after concluding platinum-based chemotherapy were managed with second-line treatment with carboplatin combined with gemcitabine or pemetrexed. Overall response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after initiation of second-line treatment were calculated for all patients. Median PFS after first-line treatment was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 10.4–14.7 months). Partial response was achieved in 7 of 23 patients, resulting in an overall response of 30.4% (95% CI, 11.6–49.0). Following initiation of second-line chemotherapy, median PFS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 1–10.9 months) and median OS was 12.5 months (95% CI, 3.5–21.5 months). The 1-year survival rate for all patients was 61.0% (95% CI, 29.5–82.0). Adding these results to those of the 10 previously published trials, 75 of 326 patients, 23%, (95% CI, 18.7–27.3) presented an overall response with the use of second-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The use of platinum combinations as second-line chemotherapy seems to have a place in the management of patients with advanced NSCLC, especially those with an interval time to progression greater than 6 months.     

Selection of a patient subgroup with advanced esophageal squamous carcinoma who could benefit from second-line chemotherapy

Despite first-line therapy, most patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) experience disease progression and may become eligible for second-line chemotherapy. Although commonly used, the role of salvage chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic ESCC has not yet been established. We analyzed 53 patients who had received second-line chemotherapy after the failure of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy as first-line therapy in ESCC between March 2000 and June 2008. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for second-line chemotherapy were 2.4 and 5.2 months, respectively, with an overall response rate of 18.9%. In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 2 or more and PFS under first-line therapy <4 months were independent prognostic factors for decreased OS. OS was estimated based on the number of adverse prognostic factors: 0 = good; 1 = intermediate, and 2 = poor. The median OS for the good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups were 11.2, 4.5 and 4.3 months, respectively (p < 0.001). The good prognostic group showed better OS than the intermediate or poor groups (p < 0.001). Second-line chemotherapy may be beneficial for OS in ESCC patients with ECOG PS 0-1 and PFS under first-line therapy ≥4 months.     

A prognostic model in patients treated for metastatic gastric cancer with second-line chemotherapy

BackgroundThis retrospective study was carried out to evaluate the prognostic significance of clinical factors in patients treated for metastatic gastric cancer with second-line chemotherapy.Patients and methodsWe evaluated the prognostic significance of various clinical factors in 126 patients, who were treated with second-line chemotherapy.ResultsMedian progression-free and overall survival (OS) for second-line chemotherapy were 3.3 and 5.3 months, respectively, with an overall response rate of 11.1%. Multivariate analysis identified three independent prognostic factors: performance status: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group zero to one [hazard ratio (HR) 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7–5.4], hemoglobin (Hb) level: ≥10 g/dl (HR 2.2, 95% CI 2.1–2.4) and time-to-progression (TTP) under first-line therapy: ≥5 months (HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3–0.8). From the obtained data, a prognostic index was constructed, dividing the patients into three risk groups: good (n = 40), intermediate (n = 36) and poor risk group (n = 56). The median survival for good, intermediate and poor risk groups were 13.5, 6.0 and 2.9 months, respectively, whereas the 1-year OS rates were 50.2%, 14.2% and 2.6%, respectively (P = 0.00001).ConclusionsWith inadequate data from randomized controlled trials at the moment, our report indicates that second-line chemotherapy is effective and beneficial in patients with good performance status, higher Hb level along with higher TTP under first-line therapy.     

Second-line single-agent versus doublet chemotherapy as salvage therapy for metastatic urothelial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of a combination of chemotherapeutic agent compared with single-agent chemotherapy in the second-line setting of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) are unclear. We aimed to study the survival impact of single-agent compared with doublet chemotherapy as second-line chemotherapy of advanced UC.Patients and methodsLiterature was searched for studies including single-agent or doublet chemotherapy in the second-line setting after platinum-based chemotherapy. Random-effects models were used to pool trial-level data according to treatment arm, including median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) probability, and grade 3–4 toxicity. Univariable and multivariable analyses, including sensitivity analyses, were carried out, adjusting for the percent of patients with ECOG performance status ≥1 and hepatic metastases.ResultsForty-six arms of trials including 1910 patients were selected: 22 arms with single agent (n = 1202) and 24 arms with doublets (n = 708). The pooled ORR with single agents was 14.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.1–17.9] versus 31.9% [95% CI 27.3–36.9] with doublet chemotherapy. Pooled median PFS was 2.69 and 4.05 months, respectively. The pooled median OS was 6.98 and 8.50 months, respectively. Multivariably, the odds ratio for ORR and the pooled median difference of PFS were statistically significant (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002) whereas the median difference in OS was not (P = 0.284). When including single-agent vinflunine or taxanes only, differences were significant only for ORR (P < 0.001) favoring doublet chemotherapy. No statistically significant differences in grade 3–4 toxicity were seen between the two groups.ConclusionsDespite significant improvements in ORR and PFS, doublet regimens did not extend OS compared with single agents for the second-line chemotherapy of UC. Prospective trials are necessary to elucidate the role of combination chemotherapy, with or without targeted agents, in the salvage setting. Currently, improvements in this field should be pursued considering single-agent chemotherapy as the foundation for new more active combinations.     

Systemic Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundXp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (Xp11.2 tRCC) is a unique subtype with poor prognosis, its response to systemic therapy is not fully understood, we evaluated the benefit of systemic therapy in these patients.Patients and MethodsBetween May 2006 and December 2019, patients diagnosed with Xp11.2 tRCC from Peking university cancer hospital were collected. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) distributions.ResultsMetastatic Xp11.2 tRCC was found in 45 patients. The median PFS and median OS was 7.4 months (4.5-8.8) and 17.9 months (12.4-24.4), respectively. First-line treatment mainly included sunitinib (n = 14), sorafenib (n = 15), axitinib (n = 6), and pazopanib (n = 5), and the median PFS of these regimens were 7.4 months, 5.4 months, 9.4 months, 8.9 months, respectively. Two patients who received Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor - tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) as first line therapy had a PFS of more than 16.6 months and more than 25.6 months, respectively. Twenty-four patients received subsequent therapies, which included VEGFR-TKI/ICI, VEGFR-TKI and mTOR inhibitor. The ORR and median PFS was 33% and 7.1 months, 7.7% and 4.3 months, 0% and 2.1 months for these treatments, respectively. The estimated median OS was 17.3 months (95% CI, 11.2 to not reached) in patients with TKI/ICI treatment and 11.0 months (95% CI, 6.1 to not reached) without TKI/ICI treatment in subsequent therapies (P = .04). Patients with serous cavity effusion or IMDC poor risk groups had significantly shorter median PFS and median OS.ConclusionMetastatic Xp11.2 tRCC is an aggressive disease. VEGFR-TKI agents appeared to demonstrate some efficacy, VEGFR-TKI /ICI combination might be a useful tool for the treatment of metastatic Xp11.2 tRCC.     

Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Anal Cancer According to HIV Infection: A Multicenter Study by the Latin American Gastrointestinal Oncology Group (SLAGO)

BackgroundHIV-positive patients are underrepresented in clinical trials of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (mSCCA). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of mSCCA patients according to HIV infection.MethodsThis was a retrospective multicenter cohort study of consecutive patients with mSCCA. All HIV-positive patients received antiretroviral therapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR).ResultsFrom January 2005 to December 2019, 113 patients were included: 20 (17.6%) had HIV infection. HIV-positive patients were younger at diagnosis and more frequently male, and 20% (n = 8) received exclusively best supportive care in comparison with 8.6% of HIV-negative patients (P = .13). Both groups were similar in terms of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, pattern of metastatic disease, and type of first-line chemotherapy. Five (25%) HIV-positive and 36 (38.7%) HIV-negative patients received second-line therapies (P = .24). RR and median PFS in first-line were similar between the groups: 35% and 30.1% (P = .78) and 4.9 and 5.3 months (P = .85) for patients with and without HIV infection, respectively. At a median follow-up of 26 months, median OS was 11.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.1 to 26.4) for HIV-infected patients versus 14.6 months (95% CI 11.1 to 18.1) for HIV-negative patients (P = .92). In the univariate analysis for OS, only ECOG performance status was significant.ConclusionHIV-positive mSCCA patients under antiretroviral therapy have oncological outcomes similar to those of HIV-negative patients. These patients should be included in trials of mSCCA.     

Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab in Patients With Advanced Non–Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From the Phase IIIb/IV CheckMate 374 Study

BackgroundThe open-label phase IIIb/IV CheckMate 374 study (NCT02596035) was conducted to validate the safety and efficacy of flat-dose nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) in previously treated advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Three cohorts included patients with predominantly clear cell histology, non–clear cell histologies, or brain metastases. We report safety and efficacy from the advanced non–clear cell RCC (nccRCC) cohort of CheckMate 374.MethodsEligible patients received 0 to 3 prior systemic therapies. Patients received nivolumab 240 mg Q2W for ≤24 months or until confirmed progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was incidence of high-grade (grade 3-5) immune-mediated adverse events (IMAEs). Exploratory endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsForty-four patients had advanced nccRCC (papillary [n = 24], chromophobe [n = 7], unclassified [n = 8], other [n = 5]); 34.1% received ≥1 prior systemic regimen in the advanced/metastatic setting. With median follow-up of 11 (range, 0.4-27) months, no all-cause grade 3-5 IMAEs or treatment-related grade 5 adverse events were reported. ORR was 13.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-27.4), with 1 complete response (chromophobe) and 5 partial responses (papillary [n = 2], chromophobe [n = 1], collecting duct [n = 1], and unclassified [n = 1] histology). Median PFS was 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.8-5.4). Median OS was 16.3 months (95% CI, 9.2-not estimable).ConclusionsSafety of flat-dose nivolumab 240 mg Q2W was consistent with previous results. Clinically meaningful efficacy was observed with responses in several histologies, supporting nivolumab as a treatment option for patients with advanced nccRCC, a patient population with high unmet need.     

Avelumab first-line maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC alone for advanced urothelial carcinoma: JAVELIN Bladder 100 Japanese subgroup analysis

Background

The phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial showed significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) with avelumab as first-line (1L) maintenance therapy + best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) that had not progressed with 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy. Efficacy and safety were assessed in patients enrolled in Japan.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC that had not progressed with 4–6 cycles of 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy were randomized to avelumab (10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks) + BSC or BSC alone. The primary endpoint was OS, and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety.

Results

In Japanese patients (n = 73) randomized to avelumab + BSC (n = 36) or BSC alone (n = 37), median OS was 24.7 months (95% CI, 18.2-not estimable) vs 18.7 months (95% CI, 12.8–33.0), respectively (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.41–1.58]), and median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI, 1.9–9.4) vs 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.9–3.8), respectively (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.36–1.11]). In the avelumab + BSC and BSC-alone arms, grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 50.0% vs 8.1%, including grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs in 13.9% vs 0%, respectively. Efficacy and safety results in Japanese patients were generally consistent with findings in the overall trial population.

Conclusion

Avelumab 1L maintenance treatment showed a favorable benefit-risk balance in Japanese patients, supporting avelumab 1L maintenance as a new standard of care in Japanese patients with advanced UC that has not progressed with 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02603432.

     

Second-line bevacizumab-containing therapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: subgroup analysis of the RIBBON-2 trial

Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) typically have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. To determine the impact of combining bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic TNBC, we performed an exploratory subgroup analysis of the randomized phase 3 RIBBON-2 trial. RIBBON-2 enrolled patients with metastatic breast cancer that had progressed on first-line non-bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy. After selection of chemotherapy (taxane, gemcitabine, capecitabine, or vinorelbine), patients were randomized 2:1 to receive chemotherapy with either bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Of 684 patients treated in RIBBON-2, 159 (23%) had TNBC. Baseline characteristics were reasonably balanced in the two treatment groups. The majority received taxane chemotherapy. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.494 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.74; P = 0.0006]. Median PFS was 6.0 months with bevacizumab-chemotherapy versus 2.7 months with chemotherapy alone. Median OS was 17.9 versus 12.6 months, respectively (HR 0.624, 95% CI 0.39-1.007; P = 0.0534). ORR was 41 versus 18%, respectively (P = 0.0078). The safety profile was consistent with the overall study population and previous phase 3 trials of bevacizumab. Patients with metastatic TNBC derived significant PFS and response benefits from the combination of bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy. Despite the small sample size and immature data, there was a trend toward improved OS.     

First-line bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: pooled and subgroup analyses of data from 2447 patients

BackgroundBevacizumab has consistently demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate when combined with first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the lack of a significant overall survival (OS) difference continues to attract debate, and identification of patients deriving greatest benefit from bevacizumab remains elusive.Patients and methodsIndividual patient data from three randomised phase III trials in the first-line HER2-negative mBC setting were analysed, focusing specifically on efficacy in poor-prognosis patients.ResultsThe meta-analysis (n = 2447) demonstrated a PFS hazard ratio (HR) of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57–0.71; median 9.2 months with bevacizumab versus 6.7 months with non-bevacizumab therapy) and response rate of 49% versus 32%, respectively. The OS HR was 0.97 (95% CI 0.86–1.08); median 26.7 versus 26.4 months, respectively. In patients with triple-negative mBC, the HRs for PFS and OS were 0.63 (95% CI 0.52–0.76) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.79–1.16), respectively. Median PFS was 8.1 months with bevacizumab versus 5.4 months with chemotherapy alone, median OS was 18.9 versus 17.5 months, respectively, and 1-year OS rates were 71% versus 65%.ConclusionsBevacizumab improves efficacy, including 1-year OS rates, both overall and in subgroups of poor-prognosis patients with limited treatment options.