Effect of tiaprofenic acid on serum digoxin concentration

The effect of concomitant tiaprofenic acid (Surgam) administration (200 mg t.i.d.) on serum digoxin concentration (SDC) was evaluated in 12 healthy volunteers on digoxin maintenance treatment. During a 10-day coadministration period with tiaprofenic acid no significant increase in SDC was observed (0.97 +/- 0.24 vs. 1.12 +/- 0.21 ng/ml, p less than 0.05). Mean tiaprofenic acid concentration amounted to 2.85 +/- 1.94 micrograms/ml 14 h after last drug intake. The incidence of adverse reactions was minimal with gastrointestinal upset in one person. Tiaprofenic acid had no influence on red or white blood cell count. Thus, in contrast to various other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs coadministration of tiaprofenic acid (600 mg daily) has no relevant influence on serum digoxin levels.     

Effect of cisapride and metoclopramide on digoxin bioavailability

Pharmacokinetics of digoxin were investigated in six healthy volunteers following one week of digoxin monotherapy 0.25 mg b.i.d., and during coadministration of metoclopramide 10 mg t.i.d. or cisapride 10 mg t.i.d.. Metoclopramide reduced the peak plasma concentration of digoxin from 1.5 +/- 0.2 ng/ml to 1.1 +/- 0.1 ng/ml (mean +/- SEM) (p = 0.05), cisapride lowered the peak concentration to 1.3 +/- 0.1 ng/ml (p = 0.14). Metoclopramide prolonged the time required to reach the peak concentration of digoxin from 2 hr to 2.7 hr (p = 0.17), cisapride did not. Digoxin AUC0-12 (743 +/- 79 ng/ml.min) was reduced by 12% on coadministration of cisapride (653 +/- 38 ng/ml.min, p = 0.22) and by 19% on coadministration of metoclopramide (605 +/- 34 ng/ml.min, p = 0.06). It is concluded that the gastrointestinal absorption of digoxin is reduced by both substances. Monitoring of the patient's clinical status should be recommended when metoclopramide and cisapride are coadministered.     

Effects of amlodipine on steady-state digoxin concentrations and renal digoxin clearance

The effect of oral amlodipine on steady-state digoxin concentrations and renal clearance was studied in 21 healthy male subjects. After 2-week digitalization (digoxin, 0.375 mg/day), they were randomized in a single-blind crossover protocol to receive either placebo or amlodipine (5 mg/day) in combination with digoxin for the following two 2-week periods. Mean (+/- SD) digoxin concentrations of 0.64 +/- 0.19 ng/ml after 2-week digoxin monotherapy and 0.61 +/- 0.23 ng/ml during placebo were not altered by amlodipine (0.60 +/- 0.18 mg/ml). Renal digoxin clearance was 202 +/- 44 ml/min on placebo and 207 +/- 55 ml/min during amlodipine coadministration. No change in pharmacologic effect of digoxin was noted during amlodipine coadministration, nor was blood pressure or heart rate changed. These data indicate that oral amlodipine does not significantly influence steady-state digoxin concentrations in healthy subjects.     

Quinidine-digoxin interaction: Evidence for involvement of an extrarenal mechanism

Summary The influence of quinidine 750 mg per day for one week on serum digoxin concentration (SDC) was evaluated in digitalized anuric patients on chronic haemodialysis. During quinidine administration the SDC increased markedly, from 0.84±0.37 to 1.58±0.72 ng/ml (p<0.01), a comparable effect to that reported previously in patients with normal renal function. Neither in vitro nor in vivo did quinidine alter the serum protein binding of digoxin. The increase in SDC in anuric patients indicates a decrease in the extrarenal clearance of digoxin, which means that mechanisms other than of renal origin are also involved in the interaction of quinidine and digoxin. There was great interindividual variability in the extent of the quinidine-induced rise in SDC. Regardless of the state of renal function, careful monitoring of digitalized patients seems mandatory once quinidine treatment is initiated.     

Long-term persistence of antianginal effect of oral verapamil in chronic stable angina

The long-term antianginal effect of orally administered verapamil over 1 year of continuous treatment was assessed in 11 patients with effort-induced angina. In the short-term phase of the study, patients were given, in random order, placebo and verapamil (360 mg/day). The tolerated work load during a bicycle exercise test was 531.8 +/- 123.0 kg/min on placebo and 763.6 +/- 124.7 kg/min on verapamil (p less than 0.001). Subsequently all patients entered a long-term study of 1-year continuous treatment with 120 mg t.i.d. verapamil. The tolerated work load at 8-week (736.4 +/- 105.1 kg/min) and 1-year (804.6 +/- 101.1 kg/min) tests did not significantly differ from the results in the short-term study. The average verapamil plasma level was 138.5 +/- 90.6 ng/ml before and 357.8 +/- 199.2 ng/ml 90 min after drug administration; the average norverapamil plasma levels were, respectively, 248.0 +/- 84.4 and 368.0 +/- 135.9 ng/ml. There was no correlation between verapamil or norverapamil plasma concentrations and the antianginal effect. No patient developed signs of heart failure during the treatment. Two patients had mild constipation. The average P-R interval was slightly, although significantly (p less than 0.01) prolonged, but no patient developed first-degree atrioventricular block. We conclude that verapamil proves an effective and safe drug in the treatment of effort-induced angina; the beneficial effects of the short-term treatment are sustained during 1 year of continuous treatment.     

Interaction between digoxin and propafenone

The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between digoxin and propafenone were investigated in 10 hospitalized patients with heart disease and cardiac arrhythmias. During steady state (0.25 mg/day) the glycoside was combined with 600 mg of propafenone daily for 1 week. The mean +/- SD serum digoxin concentration (SDC) was 0.97 +/- 0.29 ng/ml before and 1.54 +/- 0.65 ng/ml (p less than 0.003) during propafenone administration. Propafenone induced a mean decrease in 31.1 and 31.7% in total and renal digoxin clearances, respectively. The increase in SDCs was accompanied by a decrease in heart rate (HR) and shortening of QTC (QT interval corrected for HR). In patients receiving digoxin and propafenone simultaneously, the SDCs should be monitored and the digoxin dose reduced if there is evidence of toxicity.     

The effects of captopril on serum digoxin levels in patients with severe congestive heart failure

The effects of captopril on serum digoxin concentrations were studied in 8 patients with severe (NYHA Class IV) congestive heart failure. Serum digoxin concentrations were determined before and after the administration of captopril for 1 week in patients on chronic digoxin therapy. Each patient who was taking 0.25 mg of digoxin PO q.d., was administered 12.5 mg of captopril PO t.i.d. for 7 days. The peak serum concentration of digoxin (Cmax) before and after (on Days 0 and 7) captopril administration was 1.7+/-0.2 ng/ml and 2.7+/-0.2 ng/ml, the time to peak (tmax) was 2.4+/-0.5 h and 1.3+/-0.2 h, and the area under the 24-hour digoxin concentration-time curve (AUC0-24h) was 30.0+/-1.5 ng x h/ml and 41.7+/-3.4 ng x h/ml, respectively. While captopril caused a significant increase in peak serum concentration and the area under the digoxin concentration-time curve, it decreased the time to digoxin peak (p = 0.01, p = 0.04, p = 0.01, respectively). No patient developed evidence of digoxin toxicity. Concomitant administration of captopril with digoxin increases serum digoxin concentration in patients with severe congestive heart failure.     

Diltiazem increases steady state digoxin serum levels in patients with cardiac disease

Diltiazem has been reported to decrease or not to affect digoxin elimination. The effects of diltiazem on steady state concentrations of digoxin was evaluated in eleven patients with congestive heart failure receiving this drug for at least two weeks. The mean trough digoxin was 1.11 +/- 0.18 ng/ml before the coadministration of diltiazem (180 mg/day). This concentration increased to 1.54 +/- 0.22 ng/ml after three days and to 1.54 +/- 0.23 ng/ml after seven days of coadministration (P less than 0.01). Clinically, no patient showed signs of digitalis toxicity. Creatinine clearance was unchanged. The present results show that when diltiazem is added to a regimen that includes digoxin, steady state concentrations of this glycoside may increase.     

Pharmacokinetics of theophylline in infants with bronchiolitis

Summary Single-dose investigations in healthy subjects have demonstrated substantial impairment of renal and extrarenal clearance of digoxin during coadministration of verapamil. A longitudinal study has been performed to assess the changes in digoxin disposition during long-term verapamil therapy. After one week of verapamil 240 mg/d mean plasma digoxin had risen from 0.21±0.01 ng/ml (SE) to 0.34±0.01 ng/ml (p<0.01), and renal digoxin clearance had fallen from 197.57±17.37 ml/min to 128.20±10.33 ml/min (p<0.001). These changes gradually subsided, and after six weeks, renal digoxin clearance had normalized and plasma digoxin had declined to 0.27±0.02 ng/ml (NS). The 24-h urinary recovery of digoxin increased from 46.46±3.23% before to 69.78±3.69% (p<0.001) after six weeks of verapamil co-administration, and this elevation persisted throughout the study. The verapamil-induced suppression of renal digoxin elimination disappears over a few weeks of drug exposure, whereas the inhibition of the extrarenal clearance of digoxin seems to persist.     

The effect of captopril on pharmacokinetics of digoxin in patients with mild congestive heart failure.

The effect of captopril on steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin was studied in 12 patients with mild congestive heart failure (CHF; New York Heart Association functional class 1 or 2). Serum and urine digoxin concentrations were determined before and after a repeated administration of captopril in the patients on chronic digoxin therapy. The patients were taking digoxin, 0.25-0.375 mg/day, once daily, and were concurrently administered captopril, 37.5 mg/day, three times daily, for seven days. Peak serum concentration of digoxin (SCD) before and after captopril was 2.1 +/- 0.2, mean +/- SEM, and 2.0 +/- 0.1 ng/ml; the time to peak was 1.1 +/- 0.2 and 1.8 +/- 0.3 h; the terminal half-life (t1/2 alpha) was 10.9 +/- 1.0 and 8.7 +/- 0.9 h, and the area under the concentration-time curve to 24 h was 26.9 +/- 2.4 and 27.6 +/- 2.0 ng.h/ml. There was no significant difference between patients without and with captopril in SCD and its pharmacokinetic parameters. Renal digoxin clearance and creatinine clearance also showed no significant difference. After an administration of captopril, angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) activity was well suppressed. These results suggest that captopril does not increase SCD in patients with CHF, and effectively suppresses ACE activity. Thus, modification in the dosage regimen of digoxin may be unnecessary in the case of coadministration with captopril.     

Diltiazem, verapamil, and quinidine in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation

The comparative effects of diltiazem and verapamil in 30 patients with long-standing atrial fibrillation were evaluated in a prospective clinical trial. After a one- to two-day washout period during which drugs other than digoxin were withdrawn, patients were randomly assigned to diltiazem or verapamil treatment groups. All therapy was double blind. Both drugs were given in ascending doses as follows: days 1-6 (part I): diltiazem, 180 mg/d, or verapamil, 240 mg/d; days 7-12 (part II): diltiazem, 360 mg/d, or verapamil, 480 mg/d. Patients failing to convert to sinus rhythm after 12 days had dosage reduced to 180 mg/d of diltiazem or 240 mg/d of verapamil, and quinidine, 750 mg/d, was coadministered for another six days (part III). Medication compliance was verified by frequent measurement of serum drug concentrations. Three verapamil patients dropped out during part I due to adverse reactions (dyspnea, pulmonary congestion, skin rash, or hepatotoxicity). The higher dosage of either verapamil or diltiazem in part II was not well tolerated, and in eight patients part III had to be initiated early due to symptomatic bradycardia. Only one patient in the diltiazem group converted to sinus rhythm, whereas five converted with verapamil (two with verapamil alone, three when combined with quinidine). Thus, diltiazem and verapamil alone are unlikely to convert atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. The combination of verapamil and quinidine, however, is a potentially useful pharmacologic approach, having converted atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm in nearly 50% of patients.     

The influence of diltiazem hydrochloride on trough serum digoxin concentrations

A significant drug interaction between verapamil and digoxin, resulting in elevated serum digoxin concentrations, has been well documented in the medical literature. However, a similar interaction between digoxin and the calcium channel blockers nifedipine and diltiazem has not been conclusively established. This study investigated the influence of diltiazem hydrochloride on trough serum concentrations of concurrently administered digoxin in eight healthy volunteers. During the control phase of the study, volunteers were administered digoxin 0.25 mg/d for 13 days, and subsequently judged to be at steady state by serial determinations of digoxin serum concentrations. Twenty-four hour urine collections were done for creatinine clearance and urinary digoxin clearance determinations. Phase II of the study involved the addition of diltiazem hydrochloride 30 mg qid to the on-going, daily regimen of digoxin. After 14 days of concomitant therapy, steady-state trough digoxin concentrations were again determined, as well as creatinine clearances and urinary digoxin clearances. This investigation demonstrates that concomitant administration of diltiazem hydrochloride with digoxin results in significantly elevated steady-state trough digoxin concentrations (0.32 +/- 0.07 ng/ml increasing to 0.48 +/- 0.06 ng/ml, p less than 0.01). Urinary digoxin clearance decreased from 223.5 +/- 35.7 ml/min to 153.4 +/- 17.5 ml/min (p less than 0.05). Creatinine clearances were unaltered. A review of the current literature on this topic is included.     

Quinidine-induced changes in serum and skeletal muscle digoxin concentration; evidence of saturable binding of digoxin to skeletal muscle

Summary Eleven patients with atrial fibrillation on maintenance digoxin therapy were investigated by analysis of serum (SDC) and skeletal muscle (SMDC) digoxin concentrations before and 24 h and 2 weeks after starting quinidine treatment. After cardioversion the maintenance dose of digoxin was reduced in order to obtain the same steady-state SDC after 2 weeks, as before quinidine. SDC was increased by quinidine therapy from 1.56 to 2.40 nmol/1 after 24 h. With the reduced digoxin dose SDC was 1.68 nmol/1 after 2 weeks. The ratio SMDC/SDC decreased after 24 h of quinidine treatment from 35.4 to 29.0 (p<0.01). After 2 weeks of quinidine treatment with the reduced digoxin dose, the ratio had risen to 38.1, which did not differ significantly from the initial ratio. The present data suggest that the reduced skeletal muscle binding of digoxin during quinidine therapy is due to saturation of digoxin binding sites secondary to the increase in the total body load of digoxin at steady-state, and not to direct interference by quinidine with digoxin binding sites.     

Effects of atenolol, verapamil, and xamoterol on heart rate and exercise tolerance in digitalised patients with chronic atrial fibrillation

The aim of the study was to compare the effects of atenolol (50 mg b.i.d.), verapamil (80 mg b.i.d.), xamoterol (200 mg b.i.d.), and matching placebo on heart rate (HR) and exercise tolerance in digitalised patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Each treatment was taken for 4 weeks, and digoxin was continued throughout the study. During treatment with placebo (digoxin alone), the mean postexercise heart rate was 164 beats/min, and four subjects had rates of greater than or equal to 170 beats/min. Atenolol, verapamil, and xamoterol achieved significantly better control of exercise-induced tachycardia, mean postexercise heart rates being reduced to 120, 131, and 130 beats/min, respectively (p less than 0.01 for each). However, minimum HRs less than or equal to 45 beats/min occurred during treatment with placebo, atenolol, and verapamil, whereas treatment with xamoterol was associated with a minimum heart rate of 56 beats/min. Treatment with atenolol was associated with a marked reduction in maximum treadmill walking distance (mean 356 m) as compared both with placebo (mean 421 m, p less than 0.01) and verapamil (mean 439 m, p less than 0.01). Xamoterol reduced maximum walking distances as compared with verapamil (402 vs. 439 m; p less than 0.05) but not placebo (402 vs. 421 m; NSS). Thus, atenolol, verapamil, and xamoterol achieved better control of exercise-induced tachycardia than digoxin, but atenolol clearly impaired exercise tolerance whereas verapamil did not. Xamoterol achieved more even control of ventricular response rates and prevented the resting bradycardias that occurred with the other treatments. However, walking distances were significantly lower than those noted during treatment with verapamil.     

Effect of multiple doses of losartan on the pharmacokinetics of single doses of digoxin in healthy volunteers.

1. Losartan (DuP 753, MK-954) is a novel, potent and highly selective AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist. The effect of multiple oral doses of losartan on digoxin pharmacokinetics was evaluated in healthy male subjects. 2. In a double-blind and randomized fashion, subjects received 50 mg losartan or placebo once daily for 15 days in each period. At least 7 days elapsed between the two treatment periods. On days 4 and 11 of each period, subjects also received a single 0.5 mg dose of digoxin intravenously and orally respectively. 3. Eleven of 13 subjects completed the study. Side effects were mild and transient (12 out of 13 subjects reported at least one adverse experience). During the study, no laboratory abnormalities were noted. 4. Multiple oral doses of losartan (50 mg daily) did not affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of 0.5 mg of digoxin i.v. AUC(0.48h) of immunoreactive digoxin during losartan 28.8 +/- 2.9 vs 28.5 +/- 3.9 ng ml-1 h during placebo; not significant, and 96 h urinary excretion [% dose] during losartan 54.0 +/- 7.2 vs 51.9 +/- 6.5% during placebo; not significant). Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for AUC and urinary excretion were respectively, 1.03 (0.98, 1.08) and 1.09 (0.98, 1.21). 5. Multiple oral doses of losartan did not affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of oral digoxin AUC(0.48 h) during losartan 23.6 +/- 3.7 ng ml-1 h vs 22.4 +/- 2.6 ng ml-1 h during placebo; not significant, Cmax 3.5 +/- 0.7 ng ml-1 with vs 3.1 +/- 0.5 ng ml-1 without losartan; not significant and tmax 0.6 +/- 0.2 h with vs 0.9 +/- 0.7 h without losartan; not significant, and 96 h urinary excretion [% dose] during losartan 51.2 +/- 6.3 vs 46.3 +/- 2.4% during placebo; not significant). Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for AUC and urinary excretion were respectively, 1.06 (0.98, 1.14) and 1.12 (0.97, 1.28). 6. We conclude that multiple oral doses of losartan (50 mg daily) do not alter the pharmacokinetics of immunoreactive digoxin, following either intravenous or oral digoxin. Furthermore, the co-administration of digoxin with losartan is well tolerated by healthy male volunteers.     

Cisapride-cimetidine interaction: enhanced cisapride bioavailability and accelerated cimetidine absorption

The pharmacokinetic interaction between the gastrointestinal motility-stimulating substance cisapride and the H2-antagonist cimetidine was examined in 8 healthy volunteers (25 +/- 2 years of age). Steady-state kinetics of both substances were investigated after separate 1-week treatments of oral cisapride, 10 mg t.i.d., cimetidine, 400 mg t.i.d., and the two drugs combined. Cimetidine increased the cisapride peak plasma concentration from 58 +/- 25 ng/ml to 84 +/- 19 ng/ml (p = 0.01) and AUC0-24 from 509 +/- 289 ng/ml.h to 738 +/- 148 ng/ml.h (p = 0.02). Cisapride shortened the time to the peak concentration of cimetidine from 1.3 +/- 0.6 h to 0.6 +/- 0.2 h (p = 0.005) and reduced the cimetidine AUC0-24 from 11.0 +/- 2.3 micrograms/ml.h to 9.0 +/- 2.0 micrograms/ml.h (p = 0.05). It is concluded that cimetidine inhibits cisapride metabolism, whereas cisapride enhances the gastrointestinal absorption of cimetidine.     

Quinidine single dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are unaltered by omeprazole

Omeprazole has been shown in previous studies to inhibit the hepatic metabolism of selected drugs. Quinidine is an antiarrhythmic and antimalarial agent with a low therapeutic index. We therefore examined the effect of 40 mg omeprazole daily for one week or placebo on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single 400 mg dose of quinidine in 8 healthy volunteers in a double-blind crossover study. During placebo and omeprazole treatment, there was no significant difference in area under the time-plasma quinidine concentration curve, (17.0 +/- 4.83 micrograms.h/ml, 18.6 +/- 4.43 micrograms.h/ml, respectively; P greater than 0.2) or renal clearance of quinidine (56.2 +/- 26.0 ml/min, 55.6 +/- 12.7 ml/min, respectively; P greater than 0.5). Quinidine unbound fraction in plasma (0.170 +/- 0.041 vs. 0.166 +/- 0.041 in the presence of omeprazole; P greater than 0.5) was not altered by omeprazole. Peak plasma quinidine concentration and the time this occurred did not differ. Omeprazole also had no effect on these parameters for the metabolite 3-hydroxyquinidine. There was no significant difference in the change in the corrected Q-T interval on the electrocardiogram due to quinidine (mean area under the time versus delta Q-Tc curve = 351 +/- 192 ms.h, placebo; 414 +/- 303 ms.h, omeprazole) showing that quinidine pharmacodynamics were unaltered by omeprazole. We conclude that omeprazole does not affect the pharmacokinetics of quinidine.     

Significant pharmacokinetic interaction between risperidone and carbamazepine: its relationship with CYP2D6 genotypes

The effects of carbamazepine coadministration (400 mg/day for 1 week) on plasma concentrations of risperidone and its active metabolite 9-hydroxyrisperidone were studied in 11 schizophrenic inpatients treated with 6 mg/day risperidone. Blood samplings were performed before and during carbamazepine coadministration, and 1 week after its discontinuation. Plasma concentrations of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone were measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-mass spectrometry. CYP2D6 genotypes were determined using the polymerase chain reaction method. Plasma concentrations of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone during carbamazepine coadministration (2.5+/-3.6 ng/ml and 19.4+/-4.1 ng/ml) were significantly ( P<0.01) lower than those before carbamazepine coadministration (5.0+/-7.9 ng/ml and 34.6+/-9.8 ng/ml). The changes in risperidone concentrations were positively correlated to the concentration ratios of risperidone/9-hydroxyrisperidone (r(s)=0.90, P<0.01), which were closely associated with CYP2D6 genotypes. The present study suggests that carbamazepine induces the metabolism of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone, and that the decrease in risperidone concentration is dependent on the CYP2D6 activity.     

Effects of verapamil on the arrhythmogenic action of acetylstrophanthidin

Although coadministration of verapamil and digoxin results in significant increases in plasma glycoside concentrations, evidence of digitalis toxicity appears to be infrequent with this combination. To evaluate the effect of verapamil on electrophysiologic toxicity from digitalis, 5 anesthetized dogs were instrumented for physiologic recording and given acetylstrophanthidin by intravenous infusion until evidence of toxicity appeared. Each animal was then treated with verapamil intravenously, with mean steady-state plasma levels of 177 +/- 30 ng/ml, and acetylstrophanthidin infusion repeated; after return of sinus rhythm, the verapamil infusion was increased (producing mean levels of 379 +/- 50 ng/ml) and acetylstrophanthidin given a third time. Prior to verapamil dosing, ventricular ectopy was the manifestation of glycoside toxicity; following the first verapamil infusion, only 20% of the dogs developed ectopy, the remainder having second- or third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, or AV junctional tachycardia. With the higher verapamil dose, AV block or junctional tachycardia occurred in all animals during acetylstrophanthidin infusion. In addition, the dose of glycoside required to produce electrophysiologic toxicity was significantly increased by verapamil. Therefore, verapamil appears to exert a protective effect against the development of digitalis-induced arrhythmia, possibly by suppressing delayed afterpotential generation, and significantly increases the dose of digitalis required to produce AV block.     

Clinical study on digoxin tablets with high bioavailability (author's transl)

The relationship between different maintenance doses and the steady-state digoxin blood concentration was studied in 160 patients with heart failure. All patients received digoxin tablets of the same brand (Digacin). The bioavailability of this brand is 82% compared with an i.v. standard. During the treatment with daily doses of 0.2 mg and 0.3 mg average serum digoxin levels of 1.09 +/- 0.45 ng/ml and 1.33 +/- 0.53 ng/ml were measured in patients with normal renal function. The daily dose of 0.4 mg digoxin was in correlation to an average serum level of 1.75 +/- 0.81 ng/ml. 81% and 86% of all patients with normal renal function taking 0.2 or 0.3 mg digoxin every day were found to have levels in the range of 0.7 to 2.0 ng/ml. The influence of sex, age, height, body weight, maintenance dose, serum creatinine and serum potassium on the variance of the digoxin plasma levels was computed by multiple linear regression. The multiple correlation coefficient was r = 0.666, the coefficient of determination (100 r2) being 44.4%. Therefore 44.4% of the total variance could be explained by these variables. Individual variables accounted for the following percentages of the total variance: serum creatinine 29.1%; maintenance dose 14.5%; age 4.3%; and reciprocal of body weight 3.9%.