Priming stimulation modifies synaptic plasticity in the perforant path of hippocampal slice in rat

1 Introduction The ability to modify synaptic strength in an activity- dependent manner, either as long-term depression (LTD) or as long-term potentiation (LTP) is a fundamental feature of most central nervous system synapses. The properties of different forms of LTP in the rodent hippocampus have been exceedingly well studied. A less well studied but par- ticularly intriguing finding is that the capacity of many syn- apses for plastic changes itself is subject to modulation of subsequent …     

Priming stimulation modifies synaptic plasticity in the perforant path of hippocampal slice in rat

Objective The potential of all central nervous system synapses to exhibit long term potentiation （LTP） or long term depression （LTD） is subject to modulation by prior synaptic activity, a higher-order form of plasticity that has been termed metaplasticity. This study is designed to examine the plasticity and metaplasticity in the lateral perforant path of rat. Methods Field potential was measured with different priming and conditioning stimulation protocols. Results Ten-hertz priming, which does not affect basal synaptic transmission, caused a dramatic reduction in subsequent LTP at lateral perforant path synapses in vitro, and the reduced LTP lasted for at least 2 h. The LTD was unaffected. The reduction of LTP in the lateral perforant path was also readily induced by applying priming antidromically at the mossy fibers. Conclusion Priming with 10 Hz, which is within a frequency range observed during physiological activity, can cause potent, long-lasting inhibition of LTP, but not LTD. This form of metaplasticity adds a layer of complexity to the activity-dependent modification of synapses within the dentate gyrus.     

Diabetes mellitus concomitantly facilitates the induction of long-term depression and inhibits that of long-term potentiation in hippocampus

Memory impairments, which occur regularly across species as a result of ageing, disease (such as diabetes mellitus) and psychological insults, constitute a useful area for investigating the neurobiological basis of learning and memory. Previous studies in rats found that induction of diabetes (with streptozotocin, STZ) impairs long‐term potentiation (LTP) but enhances long‐term depression (LTD) induced by high‐ (HFS) and low‐frequency stimulations (LFS), respectively. Using a pairing protocol under whole‐cell recording conditions to induce synaptic plasticity at Schaffer collateral synapses in hippocampal CA1 slices, we show that LTD and LTP have similar magnitudes in diabetic and age‐matched control rats. But, in diabetic animals, LTD is induced at more polarized and LTP more depolarized membrane potentials (V_ms) compared with controls: diabetes produces a 10 mV leftward shift in the threshold for LTD induction and 10 mV rightward shift in the LTD–LTP crossover point of the voltage–response curve for synaptic plasticity. Prior repeated short‐term potentiations or LTP are known to similarly, though reversibly, lower the threshold for LTD induction and raise that for LTP induction. Thus, diabetes‐ and activity‐dependent modulation of synaptic plasticity (referred to as metaplasticity) display similar phenomenologies. In addition, compared with naïve synapses, prior induction of LTP produces a 10 mV leftward shift in V_ms for inducing subsequent LTD in control but not in diabetic rats. This could indicate that diabetes acts on synaptic plasticity through mechanisms involved in metaplasticity. Persistent facilitation of LTD and inhibition of LTP may contribute to learning and memory impairments associated with diabetes mellitus.     

Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors regulate the frequency-response function of hippocampal CA1 synapses for the induction of LTP and LTD

Synaptically released glutamate binds to ionotropic or metabotropic glutamate receptors. Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are G‐protein‐coupled receptors and can be divided into three subclasses (Group I–III) depending on their pharmacology and coupling to signal transduction cascades. Group I mGluRs are coupled to phospholipase C and are implicated in several important physiological processes, including activity‐dependent synaptic plasticity, but their exact role in synaptic plasticity remains unclear. Synaptic plasticity can manifest itself as an increase or decrease of synaptic efficacy, referred to as long‐term potentiation (LTP) and long‐term depression (LTD). The likelihood, degree and direction of the change in synaptic efficacy depends on the history of the synapse and is referred to as ‘metaplasticity’. We provide direct experimental evidence for an involvement of group I mGluRs in metaplasticity in CA1 hippocampal synapses. Bath application of a low concentration of the specific group I agonist 3,5‐dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG), which does not affect basal synaptic transmission, resulted in a leftward shift of the frequency–response function for the induction of LTD and LTP in naïve synapses. DHPG resulted in the induction of LTP at frequencies which induced LTD in control slices. These alterations in the induction of LTD and LTP resemble the metaplastic changes observed in previously depressed synapses. In addition, in the presence of DHPG additional potentiation could be induced after LTP had apparently been saturated. These findings provide strong evidence for an involvement of group I mGluRs in the regulation of metaplasticity in the CA1 field of the hippocampus.     

Plasticity-dependent changes in metabotropic glutamate receptor expression at excitatory hippocampal synapses

Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors, mGluR1 and mGluR5, modulate NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission and plasticity and mediate mGluR-dependent plasticity. Here we report that the synaptic expression of mGluRs can be regulated by NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity, but that this is dependent on the subtype of mGluR. Silent synapses, but not active synapses, were found to lack Group I mGluRs showing that mGluRs must be inserted into synapses after they are unsilenced. The induction of LTP resulted in an increased synaptic expression of mGluR1 in an NMDA receptor-dependent manner. mGluR1 is internalized from synapses via NMDA receptor-dependent LTD. Interestingly we found no evidence for the regulation of mGluR5 by NMDA receptor-dependent plasticity. This regulation of Group I mGluRs will determine the ability of synapses to undergo mGluR-dependent modulation of synaptic transmission and plasticity, providing a mechanism for metaplasticity and state-dependent plasticity at hippocampal synapses.     

Biophysical modeling of neural plasticity induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a widely used noninvasive brain stimulation method capable of inducing plastic reorganisation of cortical circuits in humans. Changes in neural activity following TMS are often attributed to synaptic plasticity via process of long-term potentiation and depression (LTP/LTD). However, the precise way in which synaptic processes such as LTP/LTD modulate the activity of large populations of neurons, as stimulated en masse by TMS, are unclear. The recent development of biophysical models, which incorporate the physiological properties of TMS-induced plasticity mathematically, provide an excellent framework for reconciling synaptic and macroscopic plasticity. This article overviews the TMS paradigms used to induce plasticity, and their limitations. It then describes the development of biophysically-based numerical models of the mechanisms underlying LTP/LTD on population-level neuronal activity, and the application of these models to TMS plasticity paradigms, including theta burst and paired associative stimulation. Finally, it outlines how modeling can complement experimental work to improve mechanistic understandings and optimize outcomes of TMS-induced plasticity.     

Bidirectional synaptic plasticity in the dentate gyrus of the awake freely behaving mouse

There is significant interest in in vivo synaptic plasticity in mice due to the many relevant genetic mutants now available. Nevertheless, use of in vivo models remains limited. To date long-term potentiation (LTP) has been studied infrequently, and long-term depression (LTD) has not been characterized in the mouse in vivo. Herein we describe protocols and improved methodologies we developed to record hippocampal synaptic plasticity reliably from the dentate gyrus of the awake freely behaving mouse. Seven days prior to recording, we implanted microelectrodes encapsulated within a lightweight, low profile head stage assembly. On the day of recording, we induced either LTP or LTD in the awake freely behaving animal, and monitored subsequent changes in population spike amplitude for at least 24h. Using this protocol we attained 80% success in inducing and maintaining either LTP or LTD. Recording from a chronic implant using this improved methodology is best suited to reveal naturally occurring brain activity and avoids both acute effects of local electrode insertion and drifts in neuronal excitability associated with anesthesia. Ultimately a reliable freely behaving mouse model of bi-directional synaptic plasticity is invaluable for full characterization of genetic models of disease states and manipulations of the mechanisms implicated in learning and memory.     

Flip side of synaptic plasticity: Long-term depression mechanisms in the hippocampus

There is growing interest in the phenomenon of long-term depression (LTD) of synaptic efficacy that, together with long-term potentiation (LTP), is a putative information storage mechanism in mammalian brain. In neural network models, multiple learning rules have been used for LTD induction. Similarly, in neurophysiological studies of hippocampal synaptic plasticity, a variety of activity patterns have been effective at inducing LTD, although experimental paradigms are still being optimized. In this review the authors summarize the major experimental paradigms and compare what is known about the mechanisms of LTD induction. Although all paradigms appear to initiate a cascade of events leading to an elevated level of Ca²⁺ postsynaptically, the extent to which these paradigms involve common expression mechanisms has not yet been tested. The authors discuss several critical experiments that would address this latter issue. Numerous questions about the properties and mechanisms of LTD(s) in the hippocampus remain to be answered, but it is clear that LTD has finally arrived, and will soon be attracting attention equal to its flip side, LTP. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Modulation of LTP/LTD balance in STDP by an activity-dependent feedback mechanism

Spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) has been suggested to play a role in the development of functional neuronal connections. However, for STDP to contribute to the synaptic organization, its learning curve should satisfy a requirement that the magnitude of long-term potentiation (LTP) is approximately the same as that of long-term depression (LTD). Without such balance between LTP and LTD, all the synapses are potentiated toward the upper limit or depressed toward the lower limit. Therefore, in this study, we explore the mechanisms by which the LTP/LTD balance in STDP can be modulated adequately. We examine a plasticity model that incorporates an activity-dependent feedback (ADFB) mechanism, wherein LTP induction is suppressed by higher postsynaptic activity. In this model, strengthening an ADFB function gradually decreases the temporal average of the ratio of the magnitude of LTP to that of LTD, whereas enhancing background inhibition augments this ratio. Additionally, correlated inputs can be strengthened or weakened depending on whether the correlation time is shorter or longer than a threshold value, respectively, suggesting that STDP may lead to either Hebbian or anti-Hebbian plasticity outcomes. At an intermediate range of correlation times, the reversal between the two distinct plasticity regimes can occur by changing the level of ADFB modulation and inhibition, providing a physiological mechanism for neurons to select from functionally different forms of learning rules.     

Intra-spaced stimulation and protein phosphatase 1 dictate the direction of synaptic plasticity

Changes in the strength of synapses in the hippocampus that occur with long-term potentiation (LTP) or long-term depression (LTD) are thought to underlie the cellular basis of learning and memory. Memory formation is known to be regulated by spacing intervals between training episodes. Using paired whole-cell recordings to record from synapses connecting two CA3 pyramidal neurons, we now show that stimulation frequency and spacing between LTP and LTD induction protocols alter the expression of synaptic plasticity. These effects were found to be dependent on protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), an essential protein serine/threonine phosphatase involved in synaptic plasticity, learning and memory. We also show for the first time that PP1 not only regulates the expression of synaptic plasticity, but also has the ability to depress synaptic transmission at basal activity levels. Moreover, PP1 can sort two consecutive messages received by the postsynaptic neuron and control the direction of change in synaptic strength. This study highlights new roles of PP1 in regulating timing-dependent constraints on the expression of synaptic plasticity that may correlate with memory processes, and together PP1 and the spacing of stimulation protocols provide mechanisms to regulate the expression of synaptic plasticity at CNS synapses.     

Relations Between Long-term Synaptic Modifications and Paired-pulse Interactions in the Rat Neocortex

The phenomenon of paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) was exploited to investigate the role of presynaptic mechanisms in the induction and maintenance of long-term synaptic plasticity in the neocortex. Long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) were induced without afferent activation by applying tetani of intracellular pulses. Our results show that synaptic modifications closely resembling LTP and LTD can be induced by postsynaptic activation alone. The polarity of these synaptic modifications depends on initial properties of the input, as indicated by a correlation between initial PPF ratio and post-tetanic amplitude changes: inputs exhibiting strong PPF, which might be associated with low release probability tend to be potentiated, while inputs with small PPF are more likely to show depression. Maintenance of both LTP and LTD involve presynaptic mechanisms, as indicated by changes in PPF ratios and in failure rate after LTP or LTD induction. Presynaptic mechanisms could include changes in release probability and/or in the number of active release sites. Because induction was postsynaptic, this supports the notion of a retrograde signal. The relative contribution of pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms in the maintenance of long-term synaptic modifications depends on the initial state of the synaptic input and on LTP magnitude. PPF changes were especially pronounced in inputs which had initially high PPF and underwent strong potentiation. Since LTP and LTD are associated with changes of PPF ratios these synaptic modifications do not only alter the gain but also the temporal properties of synaptic transmission. Because of the LTP associated reduction of PPF, potentiated inputs profit less from temporal summation, favouring transmission of synchronized, low frequency activity.     

Hippocampal synaptic metaplasticity requires the activation of NR2B-containing NMDA receptors

The potential to exhibit synaptic plasticity itself is modulated by previous synaptic activity, which has been termed as metaplasticity. In this paper, we demonstrated that the activation of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor 2B (NR2B) subunit in NNDA receptors was required for hippocampal metaplasticity at Schaffer collateral-commissural fiber-CA1 synapses. Brief 5 Hz priming stimulation did not cause long-term synaptic plasticity; however, it could result in the inhibition of subsequently evoked long-term potentiation (LTP). Meanwhile, the application of selective antagonists for NR2B subunit of NMDA receptors after delivering priming stimulation could block the metaplasticity. In contrast, LTP induction was not affected by NR2B antagonists in slices without pre-treatment of priming stimulation. These results indicated that the activation of NR2B-containing NMDA receptors was required for metaplasticity.     

Metabotropic glutamate receptors contribute to neocortical synaptic plasticity in vivo

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) have been shown to be important for hippocampus-dependent memory, as well as activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus. In this study, we examined the role of mGluRs in the induction of two forms of activity-dependent synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), in the neocortex of awake, freely-moving rats. The mGluR antagonist AIDA was administered during the induction of LTP or LTD in the motor cortex. There was a 50% reduction of LTP induced in the early component of the evoked response, but there was no effect on the late component and no effect on the induction of LTD. Thus, mGluRs contribute to at least one form of activity dependent synaptic plasticity in the neocortex.     

Induction mechanisms and modulation of bidirectional burst stimulation-induced synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus

Spike bursting is an important physiological mode of the hippocampus. Whereas the rules of spike timing-dependent synaptic plasticity are well defined for pairs of single action potentials (APs) and excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs), long-term modification of synaptic responses is much less understood for more complex pre- and postsynaptic spike patterns. We induced a burst stimulation (BS)-associated form of synaptic plasticity in rat CA1 hippocampal slices by repeatedly pairing three EPSPs with a burst of APs induced by postsynaptic current injection. In distinct groups of cells, this induction paradigm resulted in long-term potentiation (LTP), long-term depression (LTD) or no change in synaptic strength. LTP was N -methyl- d -aspartate receptor-dependent, whereas LTD could be blocked by a metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonist or inhibition of Ca²⁺ influx through voltage-activated Ca²⁺ channels. LTP was predicted by a more depolarized membrane potential and a higher initial AP frequency. LTD was facilitated by a larger time interval between the last EPSP and its preceding AP. We conclude from these findings that associative BS induces a bidirectional form of long-term synaptic plasticity that cannot be fully explained by spike timing rules. Postsynaptic membrane potential and Ca²⁺ influx further influence the sign and magnitude of synaptic modification. LTP and LTD have distinct mechanisms and can be selectively modulated. This supports the concept of two independent coincidence detectors for LTP and LTD, and extends the physiological options to modulate synaptic plasticity and maintain a putative balance between potentiation and depression in synaptic networks.     

Permissive role of interneurons in corticostriatal synaptic plasticity

Two different forms of synaptic plasticity have been found at corticostriatal synapses: long-term depression (LTD) and long-term potentiation (LTP). Both these enduring changes in the efficacy of excitatory neurotransmission in the striatum have a major impact on the physiological activity of the basal ganglia and are triggered by the stimulation of complex and independent cascades of intracellular second messenger systems. Striatal LTD and LTP are evoked following the repetitive stimulation of corticostriatal fibers and are dependent on the glutamate ionotropic receptor subtype activated. Recent experimental evidence indicates that two different subtypes of interneurons attend in the correct processing of information flow arising from the cortex and leading to striatal LTD or LTP. Acetylcholine (Ach) and nitric oxide (NO) producing striatal interneurons, in fact, are activated by the cortex during the induction phase of striatal plasticity, and stimulate, in turn, the intracellular changes in projection neurons required for LTD or LTP. Interneurons, therefore, exerts a feed-forward control of the excitability of striatal projection neurons ensuring the coordinate expression of two alternative forms of synaptic plasticity at the same type of excitatory synapse.     

Partial inhibition of PP1 alters bidirectional synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus

Synaptic plasticity is an important cellular mechanism that underlies memory formation. In brain areas involved in memory such as the hippocampus, long-term synaptic plasticity is bidirectional. Major forms of bidirectional plasticity encompass long-term potentiation (LTP), LTP reversal (depotentiation) and long-term depression (LTD). Protein kinases and protein phosphatases are important players in the induction of both LTP and LTD, and the serine/threonine protein phosphatase-1 (PP1), in particular, has emerged as a key phosphatase in these processes. The goal of the present study was to assess the contribution of PP1 to bidirectional plasticity and examine the impact of a partial inhibition of PP1 on LTP, LTD and depotentiation in the mouse hippocampus. For this, we used transgenic mice expressing an active PP1 inhibitor (I-1*) inducibly in forebrain neurons. We show that partial inhibition of PP1 by I-1* expression alters the properties of bidirectional plasticity by inducing a shift of synaptic responses towards potentiation. At low-frequency stimulation, PP1 inhibition decreases LTD in a frequency-dependent fashion. It favours potentiation over depression at intermediate frequencies and increases LTP at high frequency. Consistently, it also impairs depotentiation. These results indicate that the requirement of bidirectional plasticity for PP1 is frequency-dependent and that a broad range of plasticity is negatively constrained by PP1, a feature that may correlate with the property of PP1 to constrain learning efficacy and promote forgetting.     

Trk B signalling controls LTP but not LTD expression in the developing rat visual cortex

Neurotrophins have been suggested to act as liaison molecules between activity-dependent synaptic plasticity and the establishment of patterns of synaptic connectivity during postnatal developmental in different brain areas, including the visual cortex. In particular, recent studies have shown that Trk B ligands are involved in the formation of the ocular dominance columns during postnatal development. Here, we examined the contribution of endogenous Trk B activation to the regulation of different forms of synaptic plasticity including long-term potentiation (LTP), long-term depression (LTD) and LTP after LTD in the developing visual cortex. Rat cortical slices were incubated with a soluble form of Trk B receptor (TrkB IgG) preventing Trk B activation by endogenous ligands. LTP expression was also studied at P23 (postnatal), when the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) reaches a peak and the LTP expression is normally downregulated. The present results demonstrate that Trk B activation is required for the long-term maintenance, > 30 min, of both LTP and LTP after LTD at P17. At P23, a higher concentration of TrkB IgG was necessary to impair LTP. In contrast, neither amplitude nor duration of LTD were affected by Trk B ligands blockade. Taken together, these results indicate that endogenous Trk B ligands are necessary for the expression of LTP but not LTD at a critical time during postnatal cortical development.     

Amplitude/frequency of spontaneous mEPSC correlates to the degree of long-term depression in the CA1 region of the hippocampal slice

Prior synaptic or cellular activity influences degree or threshold for subsequent induction of synaptic plasticity, a process known as metaplasticity. Thus, the continual synaptic activity, spontaneous miniature excitatory synaptic current (mEPSC) may correlate to the induction of long-term depression (LTD). Here, we recorded whole-cell EPSC and mEPSC alternately in the Schaffer-CA1 synapses in brain slice of young rats, and found that this recording configuration affected neither EPSC nor mEPSC. Low frequency stimulation (LFS) induced variable magnitudes of LTD. Remarkably, larger magnitudes of LTD were significantly correlated to smaller amplitude/lower frequency of the basal mEPSC. Furthermore, under the conditions reduced amplitude/frequency of the basal mEPSC by exposure to behavioral stress immediately before slice preparation or low concentration of calcium in bath solution, the magnitudes of LTD were still inversely correlated to mEPSC amplitude/frequency. These new findings suggest that spontaneous mEPSC may reflect functional and/or structural aspects of the synapses, the synaptic history ongoing metaplasticity.     

Long-term depression in horizontal slices of the rat lateral amygdala

Long-term depression (LTD) is an enduring decrease in synaptic efficacy and is thought to underlie memory. In contrast to investigations of plasticity mechanisms in the amygdala in rat coronal slices, this study was done in horizontal slices. Field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) and EPSPs, respectively, were recorded extracellularly and intracellularly from the lateral nucleus of the amygdala (LA). We show that low-frequency stimulation (LFS) induces LTD in the LA, when stimulation electrodes were located in the LA. No significant differences were found between females and males. In dependence of strain variations, a reduction of GABAergic inhibition either reduced the magnitude of LTD or was a prerequisite for the induction of extracellularly recorded LA-LTD. Theta pulse stimulation (TPS) of afferents within the LA caused a weaker LTD than LFS. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) given 20 min after the end of LFS reversed LTD, whereas high-frequency stimulation (HFS) resulted in long-term potentiation (LTP) that was significantly stronger than that obtained in naive slices. Therefore, primed induction of LTD facilitates high-frequency-induced LTP in the rat lateral amygdala. NMDARs as well as group II mGluRs were involved in the mediation of LA-LTD. In contrast to data obtained by stimulation of afferents running within the LA, LFS of the external capsule fibers induced a weak LA-LTD, and TPS was not able to induce LTD. This study showed for the first time that LTD can be induced in the LA by standard LFS (900 pulses at 1 Hz) and that LTP stimuli reversed LTD. The results also provide further evidence for the broad sensitivity of synaptic plasticity mechanisms to the history of prior activity.     

Regulation and Interaction of Multiple Types of Synaptic Plasticity in a Purkinje Neuron and Their Contribution to Motor Learning

There are multiple types of plasticity at both excitatory glutamatergic and inhibitory GABAergic synapses onto a cerebellar Purkinje neuron (PN). At parallel fiber to PN synapses, long-term depression (LTD) and long-term potentiation (LTP) occur, while at molecular layer interneuron to PN synapses, a type of LTP called rebound potentiation (RP) takes place. LTD, LTP, and RP seem to contribute to motor learning. However, each type of synaptic plasticity might play a different role in various motor learning paradigms. In addition, defects in one type of synaptic plasticity could be compensated by other forms of synaptic plasticity, which might conceal the contribution of a particular type of synaptic plasticity to motor learning. The threshold stimulation for inducing each type of synaptic plasticity and the induction conditions are different for different plasticity mechanisms, and they change depending on the state of an animal. Facilitation and/or saturation of synaptic plasticity occur after certain behavioral experiences or in some transgenic mice. Thus, the regulation and roles of synaptic plasticity are complicated. Toward a comprehensive understanding of the respective roles of each type of synaptic plasticity and their possible interactions during motor learning processes, I summarize induction conditions, modulations, interactions, and saturation of synaptic plasticity and discuss how multiple types of synaptic plasticity in a PN might work together in motor learning processes.