Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labor induction. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred eighty-nine women with singleton term pregnancies and unfavorable cervices were randomly assigned to receive intravaginal misoprostol or dinoprostone. The outcome variables were change in Bishop score, time from application to active phase of labor and delivery, fetal and maternal morbidity, and the incidence of cesarean deliveries. RESULTS: The interval from application of the initial dose to the beginning of the active phase of labor was 9.8 +/- 5.8 and 14.2 +/- 10.2 hours (P <.01), and the interval from initial dose to delivery was 15.3 +/- 9.8 and 19.1 +/- 13.2 hours (P =.027) for the misoprostol and dinoprostone groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in Bishop score change, cesarean delivery rate, and the incidence of tachysystole, hypersystole, and hyperstimulation. No maternal and neonatal adverse effects were noted. CONCLUSION: Intravaginal misoprostol is more effective than intravaginal dinoprostone for labor induction in low-risk patients at term with unfavorable cervices.     

Membrane sweeping in conjunction with labor induction

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cervical membrane sweeping (stripping) during induction of labor is beneficial.METHODS: We compared outcomes of labor after induction in pregnant women at term in a randomized trial. Women were assigned to having their membranes swept or not during induction. Outcome measures included duration of labor, maximum dose of oxytocin used, induction-labor interval, and mode of delivery.RESULTS: We recruited 130 nulliparas (64 sweep, 66 nonsweep) and 118 multiparas (60 sweep, 58 nonsweep). Among nulliparas who received intravaginal prostaglandin (PG) E(2) and oxytocin, those who had simultaneous sweeping had significantly shorter mean (+/- standard error of mean) induction-labor interval (13.6 +/- 1.4 versus 17.3 +/- 1.2 hours, P =.048), lower mean maximum dose of oxytocin (6.8 +/- 0.8 versus 10.35 +/- 1.1 mU/minute, P =.01), and increased normal delivery rates (vaginal delivery 83. 3% versus 58.2%, P =.01). Sweeping also had a favorable effect on nulliparas who received oxytocin alone (mean induction-labor interval 5.8 +/- 3.1 versus 11.2 +/- 3.6 hours, P =.04; mean maximum dose 8.8 +/- 1.3 versus 16.3 +/- 1.9 mU/min, P =.01). Those differences were limited to women with unfavorable cervices. There were no differences in any outcome measures in multiparous women. CONCLUSION: Sweeping of the membranes during induction of labor had a beneficial effect on labor and delivery, which appeared to be limited to nulliparas with unfavorable cervices who needed cervical priming with PGE(2).     

Vaginally administered misoprostol for outpatient cervical ripening in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of vaginally administered misoprostol to placebo for outpatient labor induction in patients with diabetes. STUDY DESIGN: In this double-masked, controlled clinical trial, pregnant women with diabetes and gestational age of >38(1/2) weeks were randomized to receive 25 microg misoprostol or placebo vaginally on days 1 and 4 of a 7-day outpatient cervical ripening period. If necessary, inpatient labor induction was managed by using a standard protocol. RESULTS: Of 120 women included in the study, 57 received misoprostol and 63 received placebo. Most of the women had been diagnosed with gestational (Class A) diabetes. Similar numbers of misoprostol and placebo-treated women delivered within 7 days of the first dose (31/57 [54%] vs 36/63 [57%], P =.63). The mean (+/-SEM) interval from induction to delivery was similar (8530.5 minutes +/-1439.7 minutes vs 6712.5 minutes +/-606.4 minutes, P =.23). CONCLUSION: Vaginally administered misoprostol was no more effective than placebo in reducing the need for inpatient labor induction or the induction-delivery interval. Outpatient cervical ripening with use of vaginally administered misoprostol was well tolerated.     

Mifepristone for preinduction cervical ripening beyond 41 weeks' gestation: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of mifepristone with placebo on cervical ripening before labor induction in prolonged pregnancies. METHODS: One hundred eighty women with pregnancies beyond 41 weeks and undilated, uneffaced cervices were assigned randomly to receive mifepristone 200 mg or placebo and observed for 24 hours. We then gave intravaginal misoprostol 25 microg every 4 hours or intravenous oxytocin. We expected 60% of placebo-treated and 80% of mifepristone-treated women to deliver vaginally within 48 hours. RESULTS: Among 180 subjects, 97 received mifepristone and 83 received placebo. The mean interval (+/- standard deviation [SD]) from start of induction to delivery was 2209 +/- 698 minutes for mifepristone-treated subjects and 2671 +/- 884 minutes for placebo-treated subjects (P <.001, log-transformed data). Twelve (13. 6%) mifepristone-treated women and seven (10.8%) placebo-treated women delivered vaginally on day 1 (P =.60). After 24 hours, the median Bishop score for both groups was 3 (0-11) (P =.51). One hundred thirty-one subjects required misoprostol, 65 (67.0%) were mifepristone-treated women, and 66 (79.5%) placebo-treated women (P =.06). The median (range) oxytocin dose was 871.5 (0-22,174) mU for mifepristone-treated women and 2021.0 (0-24,750) mU for placebo-treated women (P =.02). Seventy-seven (87.5%) mifepristone-treated women and 46 (70.8%) placebo-treated women delivered vaginally 48 hours after the start of treatment (P =.01). There were nine cesareans in the mifepristone group and 18 in the placebo group (P =.02). More nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns and uterine contractile abnormalities occurred in mifepristone-treated subjects. There were no statistically significant differences in neonatal outcomes between groups. CONCLUSION: Mifepristone had a modest effect on cervical ripening when given 24 hours before labor induction, appearing to reduce the need for misoprostol and oxytocin compared with placebo.     

A comparison of vaginally administered misoprostol with extra-amniotic saline solution infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare intravaginal misoprostol with extra-amniotic saline solution infusion with concomitant oxytocin for cervical ripening and labor induction in viable pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred women with indications for labor induction and unfavorable cervices were assigned randomly to vaginal misoprostol or extra-amniotic saline solution infusion. Twenty-five micrograms of misoprostol was administered every 4 hours up to six doses, followed by intravenous oxytocin administration. Patients who had received extra-amniotic saline solution infusion also received intravenous oxytocin along with a maximum 12-hour saline solution infusion through Foley catheters that were placed above the internal cervical os. RESULTS: One hundred women were randomly assigned to misoprostol, and 100 women were assigned randomly to extra-amniotic saline solution infusion. The average interval from start of induction to vaginal delivery was longer in the misoprostol group (1323.3 +/- 700.3 minutes) than in the extra-amniotic saline solution infusion group (970.4 +/- 502.7 minutes; P =.006, log transformed data). Abnormal fetal heart rate tracings were found in 30% of the patients who received misoprostol and in 19% of the patients who received extra-amniotic saline solution infusion (relative risk, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.4; P =.05). There was more tachysystole in the misoprostol group (8%) than in the extra-amniotic saline solution infusion group (1%; P =.02). There were no differences in the routes of deliveries or neonatal outcomes between groups. CONCLUSION: Extra-amniotic saline solution infusion with oxytocin administration appears more effective and is associated with fewer maternal complications than misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.     

Outpatient cervical ripening with nitric oxide donor isosorbide mononitrate prior to induction of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness and safety of outpatient vaginal administration of isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) to induce cervical ripening. METHODS: A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 102 singleton term pregnant women with unfavorable cervices who were randomly assigned to receive outpatient intravaginal IMN or placebo before admission for induction of labor. The main outcome variable was time from hospital admission to delivery. Secondary outcomes included fetal and maternal morbidity, labor characteristics, and incidence of cesarean delivery. RESULTS: The admission-delivery interval was 13.45+/-6.63 and 20.12+/-8.19 h (P=0.0001) for the IMN and placebo groups, respectively. Of the IMN patients 62.75% needed prostaglandins for cervical ripening versus 90.2% with placebo (P=0.002). The incidence of tachysystole was significantly lower in the IMN group (P<0.05) but there were no significant differences in cesarean delivery rate, neonatal outcomes, and incidence of hyperstimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient use of IMN resulted in shorter admission to delivery interval, and was associated with less prostaglandin use and lower incidence of uterine tachysystole.     

Outpatient misoprostol cervical ripening without subsequent induction of labor to prevent post-term pregnancy

BACKGROUND: Interventions that may help shorten the duration of pregnancy in an African setting where facilities for fetal monitoring in post-term pregnancy are limited, and induction is not without its hazards, are needed. AIM: To determine whether outpatient administration of intravaginal misoprostol safely decreases the interval to delivery in postdate pregnancies. DESIGN: Open randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Zonal district hospitals, Kwale, Southern Nigeria (August 2000 to October 2001). METHODS: Seventy-seven women were randomized at 40 weeks gestation to receive either 25 microg misoprostol intravaginally (38) or gentle cervical assessment only (39) on an outpatient basis. Subjects were then allowed to go into spontaneous labor unless an indication for induction developed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Interval to delivery, duration of labor, and incidence of side-effects. RESULTS: Misoprostol was associated with significant decrease in mean time to delivery (4.5 +/- 4.1 versus 7.4 +/- 5.2 days; P = 0.008), earlier gestational age at delivery (40.6 +/- 0.6 versus 41.4 +/- 0.05 weeks; P < 0.001) and shorter duration of active labor (6.1 +/- 4.0 versus 8.2 +/- 5.3 h; P = 0.028), without any significant increase in fetal distress, low Apgar score at delivery or other side-effects. CONCLUSION: Outpatient administration of low-dose misoprostol can safely shorten the length of gestation in postdate pregnancies.     

The optimization of intravaginal misoprostol dosing schedules in second-trimester pregnancy termination

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and side effects of 3 doses of intravaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial of 150 women who underwent pregnancy termination between 14 and 30 weeks of gestation. Three intravaginal misoprostol regimens were compared: 200 microg misoprostol at 6-hour intervals (group 1), 400 microg misoprostol at 6-hour intervals (group 2), and a loading dose of 600 microg misoprostol followed by 200 microg at 6-hour intervals (group 3). RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the median time to achieve delivery among the 3 groups: group 1 (18.2 hours [IQ, 13.3-32.5 hours]) vs group 2 (15.1 hours [IQ, 10.9-23.7 hours]) vs group 3 (13.2 hours [IQ, 11.2-21.7 hours]; P =.035). Fifty-nine percent of the women in group 1, 76% of the women in group 2, and 80% of the women in group 3 delivered within 24 hours (P =.013). There were 7.8% of the women in group 1, 0% of the women in group 2, and 2% of the women in group 3 who were undelivered at 48 hours (P =.02). There was an increase in the incidence of fever in the first 12 hours (P =.038) and in the incidence of vomiting within 3 hours of the initial dose (P =.048) in group 3 compared with the other groups. CONCLUSION: Intravaginal misoprostol 400 microg at 6-hour intervals appears to be the preferred regimen for second-trimester pregnancy termination, with a shorter commencement to delivery interval than the 200 microg regimen and fewer maternal side-effects than the 600 microg loading dose regimen.     

A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction

We compared labor induced by vaginal misoprostol versus a supracervical Foley catheter and oral misoprostol. Singleton pregnancies at > or = 24 weeks' gestation were randomized to either an initial 25-microg dose of intravaginal misoprostol, followed by 50-microg intravaginal doses at 3- to 6-hour intervals, or a supracervical Foley balloon and 100 microg of oral misoprostol at 4- to 6-hour intervals. Primary outcome was time from induction to delivery. One hundred twenty-six women were randomized to vaginal misoprostol alone (group I) and 106 women to Foley and oral misoprostol (group II). The groups were similar in age, weight, gestational age, parity, indication for induction of labor, and oxytocin use. Cesarean delivery rates at 37% and cesarean indications were similar ( P = 0.25). The time from induction to delivery in group II (12.9 hours) was significantly shorter than that in group I (17.8 hours, P < 0.001). Uterine tachysystole occurred less often in the vaginal misoprostol group (21% versus 39%, P = 0.015). Compared with vaginal misoprostol, delivery within 24 hours was significantly more likely with a Foley balloon and oral misoprostol. The use of terbutaline and peripartum outcomes were similar in the two groups.     

Mifepristone in second-trimester medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the adjunctive use of mifepristone in second-trimester induction abortions using misoprostol 1 day after feticidal digoxin. METHODS: This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of mifepristone in second-trimester induction termination using misoprostol after feticidal digoxin. Women seeking abortion between 18 and 23 weeks of gestation were offered enrollment. At the time of digoxin amnioinfusion, participants received a randomly allocated, identical-appearing capsule containing either mifepristone, 200 mg, or placebo. Patients returned the following day for induction with buccal misoprostol. The primary outcome was the time interval from the first misoprostol dose to abortion. Analysis utilized survival curves with log-rank testing. RESULTS: Of 64 women, 32 received mifepristone and 32 received placebo. The groups did not differ by ethnicity, age, parity, reason for termination, or gestational age. Median procedure time was significantly shorter for those who received mifepristone, 10 hours (95% confidence interval [CI] 8-12), than those who did not, 18 hours (95% CI 15-22), P<.01, and those parous, 10 hours (95% CI 9-14), compared with nulliparous, 16 hours (95% CI 12-22, P=.02). Other findings in the mifepristone compared with placebo group included rates of placental retention, 3.1% compared with 6.3% (P=.61), length of hospitalization, 0.66 days compared with 0.8 days (P=.23), and analgesic requirements, 27.2 mg compared with 39.3 mg morphine (P=.22). Side effects during induction were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of mifepristone in second-trimester termination inductions using misoprostol significantly reduces the abortion time interval. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00382538 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.     

The effect of tablet moistening on labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether a dosage of 50 microg of misoprostol tablets moistened with 3% acetic acid and administered intravaginally is more efficacious for labor induction than a similar dosage regimen using dry tablets. METHODS: A total of 177 women who presented with an indication for cervical ripening and labor induction were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: 1) intravaginal misoprostol in dry tablet form, or 2) intravaginal misoprostol moistened with 1 mL of 3% acetic acid solution. The primary outcome assessed was the interval from start of induction to vaginal delivery. To detect at least a 3.5-hour difference in the primary outcome with 80% power, 87 subjects were required in each group. RESULTS: Among 162 patients evaluated, 80 were allocated to the misoprostol dry group and 82 to the misoprostol moistened group. No significant difference was noted for the mean +/- standard deviation interval to vaginal delivery: 1130 +/- 636 minutes for the group who received dry tablets and 1004 +/- 636 minutes for those who received moistened misoprostol tablets (P =.25). Additionally, no statistically significant differences were noted between the groups with respect to need for oxytocin, proportion of patients delivered after a single dose, intrapartum complications (including tachysystole and uterine hyperstimulation), mode of delivery, or perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Tablet moistening with 3% acetic acid solution does not seem to improve the efficacy of intravaginally administered misoprostol for labor induction.     

A comparison between intravaginal and oral misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial

AIM: To compare the effectiveness and safety between intravaginal and oral misoprostol for labor induction. METHODS: One hundred and six pregnant women at term with unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < or = 4) and no contraindication to prostaglandin therapy were randomized to receive either intravaginal misoprostol 50 microg every 4 h or oral misoprostol 50 microg every 4 h for prospective randomized controlled trial study. Treatment interval from induction to vaginal delivery, maternal and neonatal complications were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences of baseline characteristics and Bishop score prior to intervention between both groups. Time interval from induction to vaginal delivery in the oral group was slightly, but significantly, longer than that of the intravaginal group (886.1 +/- 443.5 min vs 637.0 +/- 373.3 min, respectively.) Additionally, the number of doses required was significantly higher in the oral group. Nonetheless, there was no significant difference between both groups with regard to failure of induction and maternal-neonatal complications. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness in terms of failed induction and safety were comparable between intravaginal and oral misoprostol, but intravaginal route was better with respect to treatment interval and number of required doses. Both routes of administration can alternatively be used for labor induction.     

A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol and oxytocin for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with premature rupture of membrane (PROM) at term. METHODS: Ninety-seven women with PROM at term were assigned randomly to receive intravaginal misoprostol or oxytocin. The primary outcome measure was the induction-delivery interval. Secondary outcomes included the number of women who delivered vaginally within 12 hours of the start of the induction in the two groups, the cesarean, hyperstimulation, and failed induction rates, the mode of delivery, and the neonatal outcome. RESULTS: Forty-eight women were assigned to intravaginal misoprostol and 49 to oxytocin administration. The mean interval from induction to delivery was 10.61 +/- 2.45 hours in the misoprostol group and 11.57 +/- 1.91 hours in the oxytocin group (p = 0.063). The rates of vaginal delivery were 83.3% and 87.7% and cesarean delivery were 16.7% and 8.2% in the misoprostol and oxytocin groups, respectively. Neonatal outcomes were not significantly different. Of the cases, 8.3% in the misoprostol group and 8.2% in the oxytocin group revealed uterine contraction abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that, intravaginally, misoprostol results in a similar interval from induction of labor to delivery when compared to oxytocin.     

Buccal versus intravaginal misoprostol administration for cervical ripening

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of misoprostol that is administered in the buccal pouch with the intravaginal route of administration. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred fifty-seven pregnant women with a singleton live gestation, Bishop score of <7, estimated fetal weight of <4500 g, and gestational age of >24 weeks were randomized to receive misoprostol that would be placed either in the buccal pouch or vagina every 6 hours. In the buccal group, after the first 2 doses of 200 microg, the dose was increased to 300 microg for the duration of the study (up to a total of 1600 microg). In the vaginal group, after the first 2 doses of 50 microg, the dose was increased to 100 microg for the duration of the study (up to a total of 500 microg). The primary outcome variable was the interval from the first dose to vaginal delivery. Power calculations indicated the need to enroll 71 patients in each arm of the study, which would allow for the detection of a 4-hour reduction in vaginal birth interval for buccal misoprostol. RESULTS: The hours from drug administration to vaginal delivery were similar between the buccal and vaginal groups (23.5 +/- 20.8 hours versus 21.3 +/- 13.4 hours), respectively. Thirty-five women (63%) versus 34 women (67%) delivered vaginally within 24 hours (P = not significant). The incidence of tachysystole was higher in the buccal group, 28 occurrences (38%) versus 15 occurrences (19%; P =.01). CONCLUSION: Buccal misoprostol is effective for cervical ripening but results in a higher incidence of tachysystole than does intravaginal administration.     

Labor induction with 25 microg versus 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the safety and efficacy of 25 microg versus 50 microg of intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. DATA SOURCES: We supplemented a search of entries in electronic databases with references cited in original studies and review articles to identify RCTs of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction, which compared repeated doses of 25 microg and 50 microg. STUDY SELECTION: We evaluated, abstracted data, and assessed the quality of RCTs to compare the safety and efficacy of 25 microg versus 50 microg of intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Five RCTs met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each outcome (random- and fixed-effects models). In addition, we aggregated the results of two separate studies, permitting an indirect comparison of the two doses being analyzed. In the meta-analysis, tachysystole and hyperstimulation syndrome appear to occur less frequently among women who received 25 microg of misoprostol than with 50 microg. However, neonatal outcomes appear to be comparable with the two doses. Regarding efficacy, use of the 50-microg dose was associated with a shorter interval to vaginal delivery, greater proportion of deliveries within 24 hours, and less frequent need for oxytocin augmentation. The indirect comparison of two studies yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: Published data indicate that intravaginal misoprostol at doses of 50 microg for cervical ripening and labor induction is more efficacious but it is unclear whether it is as safe as the 25-microg dose.     

Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the relative efficacy and cost of three commercially available prostaglandin analogs, misoprostol (Cytotec), dinoprostone gel (Prepidil), and dinoprostone insert (Cervidil), as labor preinduction agents. STUDY DESIGN: One-hundred eleven women with an unfavorable cervix who underwent labor induction were assigned randomly to receive either misoprostol 50 microg every 6 hours for two doses, dinoprostone gel 0.5 mg every 6 hours for two doses, or dinoprostone insert 10 mg for one dose intravaginally. Twelve hours later, oxytocin induction was initiated per standardized protocol. Efficacy and cost of the labor preinduction/induction with the study treatments were compared. RESULTS: Mean Bishop score change (+/-SD) over the initial 12-hour interval was significantly greater in the misoprostol group (5.2 +/- 3.1) compared with the dinoprostone insert (3.2 +/- 2.3) or the dinoprostone gel groups (2.2 +/- 1.3, P <.0001). The proportion of women who reached complete dilation (68.4%, 50.0%, 51.4%, respectively; P =.14) and who were delivered (60.5%, 47.4%, 40.0%, respectively; P =.10) within 24 hours of the initiation of induction were not significantly different between the misoprostol, dinoprostone insert, and dinoprostone gel groups. Induction-to-delivery intervals, however, were significantly shorter among women who treated with misoprostol (24.0 +/- 10.8 hours) compared with either the dinoprostone gel (31.6 +/- 13.4 hours) or the dinoprostone insert (32.2 +/- 14.7 hours, P <.05). Overall mean cost per patient that was incurred by labor induction was significantly less for the misoprostol group ($1036.13) compared with the dinoprostone insert group ($1565.72) or the dinoprostone gel group ($1572.92, P <.0001). No significant differences were noted with respect to the mode of delivery or to the adverse maternal/neonatal outcome. CONCLUSION: Misoprostol is more cost-effective than the comparable commercial dinoprostone prostaglandin preparations as an adjuvant to labor induction in women with an unfavorable cervix.     

Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 100 microg of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor. METHOD: One hundred women being induced in the Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria, were randomized to receive a single 100 microg dose of misoprostol intravaginally or intracervical insertion of Foley catheter. Data analyses were by the Student's t-test and chi-square test. RESULT: Misoprostol was more effective in terms of induction to delivery interval (11.84+/-5.43 versus 20.03+/-4.68 h, P<0.05), change in Bishop score, and number delivered within 24 h, in patients with a one-time successful induction. Uterine hyperactivity and rupture were more frequent in the misoprostol group. CONCLUSION: A single 100 microg dose of intravaginal misoprostol is more efficacious than intracervical insertion of Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Further studies using lower doses are needed to determine the safest dose.     

Oral misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes at term

OBJECTIVE: The study was undertaken to compare the efficacy, safety, and maternal satisfaction of oral misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with premature rupture of membranes at term. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred five women were stratified by parity and randomly assigned to oral misoprostol 75 microg every 4 hours as needed to establish labor or to intravenous oxytocin. RESULTS: The induction to vaginal delivery time with oral misoprostol was 737 (+/-426) minutes compared with 573 (+/-318) minutes with oxytocin (P=.04). The incidence of hyperstimulation was lower in the misoprostol group (6.0% vs 27.1%, P=.005). Women were more likely to be very satisfied with their care in the misoprostol group (86.0% vs 63.4%, P=.02). CONCLUSION: In women at term with premature rupture of membranes, oral misoprostol resulted in a longer induction to vaginal delivery interval but increased maternal satisfaction and less hyperstimulation compared with intravenous oxytocin. Further research is needed to assess uncommon neonatal and maternal outcomes.     

A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol tablets with transcervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening. METHODS: Pregnant women who presented for induction of labor with unfavorable cervices (Bishop score less than 6) were assigned randomly to intravaginal misoprostol (50 microg tablet every 4 hours for a maximum of six doses) or 30-mL Foley catheter placed transcervically with maintenance of traction. RESULTS: Among 111 women, 53 were allocated to misoprostol and 58 to Foley bulb. Contractile abnormalities were more frequent in the misoprostol group (20.4%) than the Foley group (0%) (P <.001). No statistically significant differences were noted between groups in change in Bishop score, preinduction cervical ripening times, and total induction times. There were no statistically significant differences in mode of delivery or adverse neonatal outcomes. Uterine rupture occurred in one woman with two previous cesarean deliveries in the misoprostol group. CONCLUSION: Intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical Foley catheter are equivalent for cervical ripening. Uterine contractile abnormalities and meconium passage are more common with misoprostol.     

Comparison of 25 and 50 microg vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction of cervical ripening and labor induction.

Our purpose was to compare the efficacy of 25 microg and 50 microg intravaginally administered misoprostol tablets for cervical ripening and labor induction. Either 25-microg (n: 58) or 50-microg (n: 56) misoprostol tablets were randomly administered intravaginally to 114 subjects with an unripe cervix for labor induction. The physician was blinded to the medication. Intravaginal misoprostol was given every 4 h until the onset of labor. The mean Bishop score before misoprostol administration was 2.1 +/- 1.6 in the 25-microg group and 2.0 +/- 1.4 in the 50-microg group (p > 0.05). With the 25-microg dose the time until delivery was significantly longer (991.2 +/- 514.4 min vs. 703.12 +/- 432.6 min in the 50-microg group). The use of oxytocin augmentation was significantly higher in the 25-microg group (63.8%) than the 50-microg group (32.1%; p < 0.05). The proportions of patients with tachysystoles and hypersystoles were not significantly different between the two groups (19 and 6.9%, respectively, in the 25-microg group and 25 and 17.8%, respectively, in 50-microg group; p > 0.05). Overall, in the 25-microg group more women achieved vaginal delivery (79.3 vs. 60.7%; p < 0.05). The rate of cesarean sections due to non-reassuring fetal status was higher in the 50-microg misoprostol group (28.6 vs. 10.3%; p < 0.05). The number of neonates with a low 1-min Apgar score (<7) was significantly higher in the 50-microg misoprostol group (26.8 vs. 8.6%; p < 0.05), but 5-min Apgar scores and umbilical artery blood gas values at the time of delivery were not significantly different between the groups (p > 0.05). One patient in the 25-microg group suffered a ruptured uterus. Intravaginal administration of 25 microg of misoprostol is a clinically effective labor induction regimen and has the least adverse effects and complications.