Evaluation of the BacT/ALERT 3D system for recovery and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

We evaluated the BacT/ALERT 3D system for recovery and drug susceptibility testing (DST) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). Of 2659 clinical specimens, MTB was detected in 92 using BacT/ALERT, compared to 94 using Löwenstein–Jensen culture. Detection time was 25% shorter with BacT/ALERT. Sensitivities were 92%, 96%, 78% and 100% for resistance to rifampicin, isoniazid, streptomycin and ethambutol, respectively, while specificity was 100% for all antibiotics, when BacT/ALERT was compared with the BACTEC 460 method on 50 MTB isolates. The BacT/ALERT system is fully automated and creates no radioactive waste. It seems to be a valid alternative for primary isolation, but further evaluation is needed regarding DST.     

Evaluation of the MB/BacT mycobacterium detection system for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The MB/BacT mycobacterium detection system was evaluated for its performance in the susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Eighty-three M. tuberculosis isolates were processed. Results for all isoniazid-, rifampin- and streptomycin-susceptible, isoniazid-resistant, and rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates with the MB/BacT system agreed 100% with those obtained by the agar proportion method. The agreements between the two methods for streptomycin- and ethambutol-resistant isolates were 96.4 and 90.4%, respectively. The susceptibility test results were obtained in 7 days, on average. These data demonstrate that the MB/BacT system is an accurate, nonradiometric method for rapid susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis.     

Reliability of the MB/BacT system for testing susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates to antituberculous drugs

The susceptibility of 115 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex clinical isolates to isoniazid, streptomycin, ethambutol, and rifampin was assessed by the MB/BacT and BACTEC 460TB systems. The correlation between the two tests was 98.3% for isoniazid, 100% for streptomycin and rifampin, and 95.8% for ethambutol. Turnaround times for antimicrobial susceptibility testing ranged from 5 to 11 days (median, 8.5 days) for MB/BacT and from 4 to 8 days (median, 6 days) for BACTEC 460TB.     

Evaluation of a plastic nonvented aerobic blood culture bottle for use with the BacT/ALERT microbial detection system

The current BacT/ALERT SA (BTA SA) aerobic blood culture bottle is made from glass, does not require venting, and contains a liquid emulsion sensor (LES). Its performance has been shown to be equivalent to that of the vented standard aerobic culture bottle. A further-improved version of the BTA SA bottle, designated the BacT/ALERT plastic SA (BTA PSA) culture bottle, is made from clear plastic to prevent breakage, does not require venting, and contains a modified LES (LES 2) to reduce the possibility of false positives. The BTA PSA provides a practical alternative to the current glass version of this bottle. The plastic bottle is also comparable to the current glass bottle in transparency and growth performance and additionally minimizes the exposure to infectious agents due to glass bottle breakage.     

Evaluation of rapid radiometric method for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

A total of 106 isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis were tested for drug susceptibility by the conventional 7H11 plate method and by a new rapid radiometric method using special 7H12 liquid medium with 14C-labeled substrate. Results obtained by the two methods were compared for rapidity, sensitivity, and specificity of the new test method. There was 98% overall agreement between the results obtained by the two methods. Of a total of 424 drug tests, only 8 drug results did not agree, mostly in the case of streptomycin. This new procedure was found to be rapid, with 87% of the tests results reportable within 4 days and 98% reportable within 5 days as compared to the usual 3 weeks required with the conventional indirect susceptibility test method. The results of this preliminary study indicate that the rapid radiometric method seems to have the potential for routine laboratory use and merits further investigations.     

Evaluation of Etest for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The Etest method for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis was compared to the agar proportion method using four first-line agents and two fluoroquinolones. Catergorical agreement between the methods was 100% for rifampin, ethambutol, streptomycin, and ofloxacin and 98% for isoniazid. Results were obtained in 6 to 10 days by Etest. The Etest method is suitable for testing the agents evaluated against M. tuberculosis.     

Evaluation of the VersaTREK system compared to the Bactec MGIT 960 system for first-line drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the VersaTREK system for Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing compared with results obtained with the Bactec MGIT 960 system. A total of 67 strains were evaluated. Overall agreement was at 98.5%. Kappa indexes were 1.0 for isoniazid, rifampin, and ethambutol, 0.937 for pyrazinamide, and 0.907 for streptomycin. The VersaTREK system is validated for M. tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing.     

Multicenter laboratory evaluation of the MB/BacT Mycobacterium detection system and the BACTEC MGIT 960 system in comparison with the BACTEC 460TB system for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

In this multicenter study, the reliability of two nonradiometric, fully automated systems, the MB/BacT and BACTEC MGIT 960 systems, for testing the susceptibilities of 82 Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains to isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, and streptomycin was evaluated in comparison with the radiometric BACTEC 460TB system. The arbitration of discrepant results was done by the reanalysis of the strain, the determination of the MIC, and the molecular characterization of some resistance determinants. The overall level of agreement with BACTEC 460TB results was 96% with the MB/BacT test and 97.2% with the BACTEC MGIT 960 system. With both methods, the level of agreement with BACTEC 460TB results was 96.3% for isoniazid, 98.8% for rifampin, and 98.8% for ethambutol. The level of agreement for streptomycin was 90.2% with MB/BacT and 97.5% with BACTEC MGIT 960. Overall, there were 11 very major errors and 2 major errors with the MB/BacT method and 5 very major errors and 2 major errors with the BACTEC MGIT 960 system. In general, the MB/BacT and BACTEC MGIT 960 systems showed good performance for susceptibility testing with first-line antituberculosis drugs.     

Performance of the microscopic observation drug susceptibility assay in drug susceptibility testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The drug susceptibility testing performance of a broth-based method with microscopic reading of bacillary growth, the microscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) assay, was compared to that of the reference 7H10 agar method of proportion by using 53 isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from persons at risk for multidrug-resistant TB. For isoniazid (0.1 micro g/ml) and rifampin (2.0 micro g/ml), there was 100% agreement between MODS results read at day 11 and the reference method. Levels of agreement for ethambutol tested at 2.5 and 7.5 micro g/ml were 70 and 58%, respectively. Levels of agreement for streptomycin tested at 2.0 and 6.0 micro g/ml were 77 and 51%, respectively. For isoniazid and rifampin drug susceptibility testing, MODS is as accurate as and more rapid than the reference method.     

Radiometric and conventional drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

One hundred and four clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis were susceptibility tested by the radiometric method (RAD) using the BACTEC system in parallel with a conventional modified proportion method (CON). In the latter, the strains were tested against four concentrations of drugs in Lowenstein-Jensen medium (isoniazid (INH), streptomycin (SM) and ethambutol (EMB)) OR 7H10 agar medium (rifampicin (RIF)) and reported as "sensitive", "intermediate" or "resistant" from the minimum inhibitory concentrations observed. The radiometric results were classified in the same three groups in accordance with the BACTEC methodology. The overall agreement between the results obtained by the two methods was 97.4% (INH 95.2%, EMB 96.2%, SM 98.1% and RIF 100%). In addition, the agreement between RAD and each of the drug concentration steps employed in CON was examined and the results discussed in relation to the established critical concentrations of the drugs. The BACTEC technique was found to be a rapid and convenient method for routine use.     

Potential use of BacT/Alert automated blood culture system for antifungal susceptibility testing.

A simple, rapid susceptibility test is needed to determine the possible resistance of yeasts to commonly used antifungal agents. The BacT/Alert automated blood culture system was evaluated as one technology for development of such a test. Yeast nitrogen base was used as the growth medium, and amphotericin B was the test antifungal agent. Isolates of various Candida species, Torulopsis glabrata, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Cryptococcus neoformans were evaluated. The results suggest that detection of amphotericin B resistance of yeast isolates within 12 to 14 h after inoculation of test medium is possible.     

Evaluation of whole genome sequencing and software tools for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Objectives

Culture-based assays are currently the reference standard for drug susceptibility testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. They provide good sensitivity and specificity but are time consuming. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether whole genome sequencing (WGS), combined with software tools for data analysis, can replace routine culture-based assays for drug susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis.

Nonweekend schedule for BACTEC drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Determination of the drug susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by conventional methods using an agar-based medium may take 3 weeks or more to complete. On the other hand, results on positive cultures are generally available in 4 to 7 days with the radiometric (BACTEC, Johnston Laboratories, Towson, Md.) procedure. One disadvantage to the latter is the requirement to determine the quantity of 14CO2 in each test vial on a daily basis from the day of inoculation. Growth index readings often must be made over weekends, adding to the work load of clinical laboratories during periods of reduced staff or necessitating compensatory pay or time. Susceptibility tests with streptomycin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and rifampin against 104 M. tuberculosis strains were performed by the submerged disk method, the recommended BACTEC method with daily growth index readings, and the radiometric procedure with readings delayed for 2 days after inoculation. Criteria for interpretation of "delayed" tests were established. Drug concentrations tested included some modifications of those available commercially. Overall agreement for the four drugs by the three methods was greater than 90%. We conclude that under our test conditions a schedule of inoculation of radiometric test vials on Friday with growth index readings commencing on Monday gives susceptibility results that correlate well with the daily BACTEC method and with a conventional 7H10 agar method.     

Multicenter evaluation of the MB/BACT system for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The reliability of the MB/BACT system for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide, rifampin, isoniazid, streptomycin, and ethambutol was compared to the BACTEC 460TB system. The proportion method was used to resolve discrepant results by an independent arbiter. Two interpretative methods were used, with an undiluted control (direct control) and a diluted control (10(-1) control). As no significant difference was observed between the two controls, the method with the direct control was adopted as the most accurate one. One hundred sixty-six strains were tested, with an overall agreement of 98.3%. After resolution of the 18 discrepant results by the proportion method, the sensitivity and specificity of the MB/BACT system were 100% for rifampin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide. For ethambutol, sensitivity was 92.3% at the critical concentration and 33% at the high concentration, and specificity was 100% at both concentrations. For streptomycin, sensitivity was 100% at the critical concentration and 80% at the high concentration, and specificity was 98.6% at the critical concentration and 100% at the high concentration. The rifampin, isoniazid, streptomycin, and ethambutol susceptibility test results were obtained in 6.6 days with the MB/BACT versus 5 days with the BACTEC 460TB. The pyrazinamide susceptibility test results were obtained in 7.8 days with the MB/BACT, versus 6.7 days with the BACTEC 460TB. These data demonstrate that the fully automated MB/BACT system is a very reliable method for rapid susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis against rifampin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide. Sensitivity results have to be improved for ethambutol and streptomycin, especially at the high concentration.     

The ins and outs of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing

Drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the diagnostic laboratory classifies clinical isolates as either drug-‘resistant’ or drug-‘susceptible', on the basis of their ability to grow in the presence of a ‘critical concentration’ of the test compound. From knowledge of the mechanisms that underlie drug resistance, it has become evident that drug resistance in M. tuberculosis is quite heterogeneous and involves low-level, moderate-level and high-level drug resistance phenotypes. Different mutations are associated with different levels of phenotypic resistance, and the acquisition of a genetic alteration leading to a decrease in drug susceptibility does not inevitably exclude the affected compound from treatment regimens. As a result, the simple categorization of clinical M. tuberculosis isolates as ‘resistant’ on the basis of susceptibility testing at ‘critical concentrations’ may need to be revised and supplemented by quantitative measures of resistance testing to reflect the biological complexity of drug resistance, with the view of optimally exploiting the compounds available for treatment.     

Rapid and inexpensive drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with a nitrate reductase assay

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis is an increasing public health concern in many parts of the world, especially in low-income countries, where most cases occur. Traditional drug susceptibility testing is either time-consuming, such as the proportion method on solid media, or expensive, such as the BACTEC 460 system. We have evaluated a new nitrate reductase assay (NRA) that depends on the ability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to reduce nitrate to nitrite. The reduction can be detected using specific reagents, which produce a color change. We tested a panel of 57 M. tuberculosis strains with various resistance patterns. The bacteria were inoculated on L?wenstein-Jensen medium, either without drugs or with rifampin, isoniazid, streptomycin, or ethambutol and with potassium nitrate (KNO(3)) incorporated. After incubation for 7, 10, or 14 days, the reagents were added and nitrate reduction, indicating growth, could be detected by a color change. Sensitivities to and specificities for drugs as determined by the NRA method compared to those determined by the BACTEC 460 method were 100 and 100% for rifampin, 97 and 96% for isoniazid, 95 and 83% for streptomycin, and 75 and 98% for ethambutol, respectively. The results were in the majority of the cases available in 7 days. The evaluated method is rapid and inexpensive and could correctly identify most resistant and sensitive M. tuberculosis strains. It has the potential to become an interesting alternative to existing methods, such as the proportion and BACTEC methods, particularly in resource-poor settings.     

Evaluation of Etest strips for rapid susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

In this study, our objective was to evaluate Etest strips containing exponential gradients of isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), and streptomycin (STR) for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. M. tuberculosis isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibilities by the standard proportion method using L?wenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium and by the Etest. The MICs determined by the Etest were obtained at 5, 7, or 10 days. In some strains with Etest-discrepant results, radiometric susceptibility testing (BACTEC) was performed to determine a consensus result. M. tuberculosis concordance between the two methods was 97% (86 of 89 isolates) for RIF, 96% for INH (84 of 87 isolates), and 80% (61 of 76 isolates) for STR. Most of the MICs determined by the Etest were easy to interpret and readable within 5 days. Results correlated well with those obtained by the LJ proportion and BACTEC methods for INH and RIF. However, a high proportion of false-sensitive and false-resistant results were observed, most often for STR. We also observed that variations in the inoculum size of M. tuberculosis isolates affected the MICs to a substantial degree. These discrepancies, along with the expense of the media, the Etest strips, and the specialized equipment required (CO2 incubator), make this method less useful in developing countries.     

Growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in conventional BacT/ALERT FA blood culture bottles allows reliable diagnosis of Mycobacteremia

The conventional BacT/ALERT FA blood cultures supported the ample growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in seeding experiments and appeared to perform as reliably as the BACTEC Myco/F-Lytic vials in the recovery of M. tuberculosis from blood in HIV-infected patients. Overall, blood cultures were positive in 39% of patients with tuberculosis.     

Evaluation of Etest for susceptibility testing of multidrug-resistant isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

To prescribe effective treatment schemes for patients with tuberculosis, more-efficient susceptibility testing techniques for Mycobacterium tuberculosis are needed, especially in regions with multidrug resistance. Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) is a simple technique that provides quantitative drug susceptibility results for M. tuberculosis in 5 to 10 days from a culture grown at low cost. The performance of Etest was compared to that of the reference proportion method, using 95 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates of which 42.1% (40 of 95) were resistant to at least one antibiotic by the reference method. Overall agreement between Etest and the reference method was 98.9% (94 of 95) for detection of multidrug resistance; for resistance to individual drugs, agreement was 97.9% (93 of 95) for rifampin, 96.0% (92 of 95) for ethambutol, 94.7% (90 of 95) for isoniazid, and 85.3% (81 of 95) for streptomycin. This study supports the utility of Etest for timely detection of drug resistance in M. tuberculosis and for use in tuberculosis control programs.