Ifosfamide and paclitaxel salvage chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combinationof ifosfamide (1.5 g/m² i.v. on days 1, 2, 3) and paclitaxel(135 mg/m² i.v. over 3 hours on day 3) with G-CSF (5µg/kg/d subcutaneously, days 7–11) administered every 3 weeks onan outpatient basis in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancerpreviously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.Patients and methods: Thirty-five consecutive patients were treated,12 of whom had previously received two regimens. Twelve of the 35 were definedas platinum-resistant and 23 as potentially platinum-sensitive.Results: Fifteen patients (43%; 95% CI:26%–61%) achieved objective responses, five of themcomplete and ten partial. Objective responses occurred in 17% of theplatinum-resistant patients and in 57% of those with potentiallyplatinum-sensitive disease. The median duration of response was seven monthsand the median overall survival 11 months. The treatment was well toleratedand only 15% of the patients developed grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Withthe exception of alopecia there were no other grade 3 or 4 toxicities.Conclusions: The combination of ifosfamide and paclitaxel was welltolerated and showed activity in patients with ovarian cancer who hadpreviously undergone platinum-based chemotherapy.     

Combination of CPT-11 with cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

As CPT-11 was shown to be efficacious in recurrent ovarian cancer, a phase II trial has been undertaken at a recommended dose determined in the phase I trials of combination therapy of CPT-11 with cisplatin (CDDP). As first-line chemotherapy, 60 mg/m(2) of CPT-11 (on days 1, 8, and 15) and 60 mg/m(2) of CDDP (on day 1) were intravenously administered to patients with epithelial ovarian cancer with residual lesions larger than 2 cm, and patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy. Case 1 and 2 achieved CR and PR after completion of the first and second courses, respectively. After the third course when CA125 values turned negative, secondary cytoreductive surgery was performed in both cases, and the tumor was completely extirpated. Dose limiting toxicity was neutropenia, which was managed by administration of granulocyte stimulating factor or by skipping the administration of CPT-11. In Case 2, the number of platelets decreased with repetition of the courses. Grade 3 or worse diarrhea was not observed. The combination therapy of CPT-11 with CDDP is considered to be safe and efficacious in treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.     

First-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: paclitaxel, cisplatin and the evidence.

As of June 1998, four randomized trials have been completed comparing the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin with a cisplatin-based control arm. The results of three of these trials are available; one has been published as a full paper, the other two in abstract form only. Two of the reported trials (GOG-111 and the Intergroup trial) provide clear evidence that cisplatin combined with paclitaxel is a more effective regimen than one using the same dose of cisplatin combined with cyclophosphamide. The results of the third reported trial (GOG-132) are rather different, suggesting that a higher dose of single-agent cisplatin may be as effective as the paclitaxel/cisplatin combination tested in the other two trials. A number of explanations for these unexpected results have been proposed: false-positive results in GOG-111 and the Intergroup trial; false-negative results in GOG-132; high crossover in GOG-132 (including crossover before progression); the cyclophosphamide in the control arm of GOG-111 and the Intergroup trial had a negative impact on outcome in the control group in these trials; the higher dose of cisplatin when used as a single agent in GOG-132 had a positive impact on outcome for the control group in this trial. These explanations are discussed in detail, and their implications explored.     

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin consolidation therapy after platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy for suboptimally debulked, advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer patients

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of using pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) as a consolidation therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who have attained a clinically defined complete response to initial platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with suboptimally debulked stage IIIC/IV epithelial ovarian cancer who attained a clinically defined complete response at the completion of platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy were eligible for this protocol. Patients were treated with PLD at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) every 28 days for four cycles. A survival analysis was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of the 30 patients enrolled, 29 were evaluable. Twenty-three patients (79%) completed all four cycles of consolidation therapy. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia was the most common toxicity. Six patients remained clinically without evidence of disease with a median follow-up of 35 months from the completion of primary chemotherapy. The median progression-free interval was 15 months, and median overall survival time was 31 months, with 47% of patients achieving a 4-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: Consolidation therapy with PLD chemotherapy administered to women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after initial chemotherapy appears feasible based on its toxicity profile. Considering the tolerability of this agent, further investigation is needed to depict the optimal dose and schedule needed for consolidation therapy.     

Docetaxel and cisplatin in combination as first-line chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Trials Group.

PURPOSE: A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter, open feasibility study of cisplatin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer was conducted. The primary end point was the incidence of severe fluid retention that necessitated treatment withdrawal. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cisplatin and docetaxel were administered every 3 weeks for six planned cycles, with a 5-day prophylactic dexamethasone regimen (8 mg two times per day). One hundred patients (median age, 53 years; range, 24 to 71 years) received a total of 512 cycles of chemotherapy in two cohorts: cohort 1, 49 patients, 258 cycles (cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2)); cohort 2, 51 patients, 254 cycles (cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 85 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: No patients were taken off study because of fluid retention. Sixty-six patients completed six cycles of protocol therapy; 16 stopped early because of toxicity (neurotoxicity in six patients, nephrotoxicity in three, neutropenia in two, and hypersensitivity, diarrhea and vomiting, skin rash, clinical deterioration, and patient's wishes in one patient each). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in more than 75% of patients and seemed to be cumulative. Patients in cohort 2 had significantly more severe neutropenia and lethargy than those in cohort 1. In addition, there were five treatment-related deaths in cohort 2 (three neutropenia and two upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage). Neurotoxicity (mainly sensory, > grade 1) was observed in 23 patients. The overall clinical response rate was 69% (complete response, 38%; partial response, 31%); CA-125 response rate was 73%. Median progression-free survival for the group was 12 months. CONCLUSION: Cisplatin and docetaxel can be administered at doses of 75 mg/m(2) and 75 mg/m(2), respectively, every 3 weeks, and the utility of this regimen is not limited by fluid retention. However, 33 of 100 patients were unable to complete the planned six cycles, which may explain, in part, the poor overall progression-free survival. Increasing the docetaxel dose to 85 mg/m(2) adds unacceptable hematologic toxicity and potential risks to the patient.     

High-dose, short-duration cisplatin/doxorubicin combination chemotherapy for advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.

Sixty-one patients with epithelial ovarian cancer were treated with intensive high-dose, short-course chemotherapy that consisted of cisplatin (120 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (70 mg/m2) every 3 weeks for four cycles. Patients in complete clinical remission were offered second-look laparotomy (SLL). Patients with minimal or no residual disease at SLL were randomized to either cyclophosphamide (1000 mg/m2 every 21 days for six cycles) or whole-abdominal radiation therapy. All patients completed therapy with a median leukocyte nadir 1.3/microliter and platelet nadir of 90/microliters. Forty-five patients (74%) had a complete clinical response. Results of twenty-two of 36 second-look procedures (64%) showed no evidence of disease (NED). After SLL, 19 patients received six courses of cyclophosphamide and 16 patients received whole-abdominal radiation. Nine patient who refused SLL and one patient with negative SLL findings refused additional treatment. The median survival time for all patients was 51.3 months. High-dose intensive chemotherapy regimens have high response rates, but survival needs to be compared with traditional low-dose regimens. Although high-dose cisplatin and doxorubicin were myelosuppressive, the resulting complications were manageable. There was no significant difference between the mean survival times of patients receiving Cytoxan, abdominal radiation, or no treatment as second-line therapy.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of paclitaxel and cisplatin versus cyclophosphamide and cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced ovarian cancer. A European perspective

Paclitaxel is a new cytotoxic agent that has demonstrated significant activity in advanced ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the cost structure of advanced ovarian cancer and the cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel-cisplatin (PC) combination therapy compared with a standard cyclophosphamide-cisplatin (CC) regimen at first-line therapy. The analysis was performed separately for six European countries: Germany, Spain, France, Italy, The Netherlands and the U.K. The study was conducted from the national health service payer's perspective. The total cost of treatment per patient (six cycles of chemotherapy) in the six European countries varied between a minimum of US$4,926 in the U.K. and US$12,578 in Germany for the CC regimen and between US$13,038 and US$24,487 for the PC regimen (April 1996). Since the new regimen improved life expectancy by 1.283 years compared with CC, the incremental cost-effectiveness of PC was calculated to be between US$6,403 per 5-year saved in the U.K. and US$11,420 per life-year saved in Italy. Overall, the cost-effectiveness of PC compares favourably with other oncological interventions. The findings of this study suggest that healthcare decision makers should consider paclitaxel, in combination with cisplatin, as a cost-effective first-line therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.     

Carboplatin and paclitaxel versus cisplatin, paclitaxel and doxorubicin for first-line chemotherapy of advanced ovarian cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study

IntroductionThe combination of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel is considered the standard of care as initial chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer (AOC). We compared this regimen with the combination of Cisplatin, Paclitaxel and Doxorubicin.Patients and methodsPatients with AOC were randomised to either six courses of Paclitaxel 175 mg/m² plus Carboplatin 7AUC or Paclitaxel at the same dose plus Cisplatin 75 mg/m² plus Doxorubicin 40 mg/m².ResultsAnalysis was performed on 451 patients. The treatment groups were well balanced with regard to patient and disease characteristics. Performance status (PS) was better in the anthracycline arm. In terms of severe toxicity, the only significant difference between the two groups was the development of febrile neutropaenia in the anthracycline arm. Overall response rate was similar in both groups. With a median follow-up of 57.5 months, a marginal significance towards improved Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was noted in favour of the anthracycline arm, whilst there was no difference in overall survival. In multivariate analysis the hazard of disease progression at any time was significantly decreased by 25.5% for patients of the anthracycline arm.ConclusionThe combination of Cisplatin, Paclitaxel and Doxorubicin demonstrates a marginal PFS improvement, but no additional survival benefit when compared with the standard Carboplatin/Paclitaxel regimen.     

Irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with previously untreated advanced epithelial ovarian cancer were enrolled in this study. CPT-11 60 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 28 days for at least two cycles. The median patient age was 55 years (range, 37-75), and the median performance status was 1. RESULTS: Objective responses were recorded in 19 of 25 eligible patients (76%; 95% confidence interval, 55-91%). Complete responses were obtained in 2 patients (8%), and partial response in 17 patients (68%). Stable disease was recorded in 2 patients (8%) and progressive disease in 2 (8%). The median time to response was 62 days (range, 28-234 days). The median survival time for all 25 patients was 30.9+ months (range, 4.1-60.0+ months). The major toxic effects were leukopenia, neutropenia, and diarrhea. Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and diarrhea occurred in 17 (68%), 20 (83.3%), and 5 patients (20%), respectively. Thrombocytopenia was less common. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: The combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin showed significant activity in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Neutropenia was the dose-limiting adverse effect, whereas diarrhea was mainly mild to moderate.     

Phase I/II study of the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Purpose: We performed a phase I/II study evaluating the combination ofpaclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients withadvanced ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to define a feasible andsafe combination regimen that could be recommended for future phase IIIstudies.Design: This study was a parallel two-arm, non-randomized, open trial. Ina first step, carboplatin was administered at a fixed dose of AUC 5 andpaclitaxel was escalated in 25 mg/m² steps starting at 135mg/m². Paclitaxel was given as a three-hour infusion.Carboplatin was administered on day 1 following paclitaxel in one study armand 24 hours after paclitaxel infusion on day 2 in the other study arm.Carboplatin was escalated to AUC 6 and AUC 7.5 after the MTD for paclitaxelhad been defined. Treatment was repeated every three weeks.Patients: Sixty-one patients with untreated histologically confirmedepithelial ovarian cancer were recruited of whom 59 were found eligible andevaluable for toxicity. Thirty-three patients with bidimensionally measurabledisease were evaluable for tumor response.Results: We could not detect any advantage of the two-day schedule comparedwith the more convenient one-day schedule. Dose limiting toxicities wereneutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and neurotoxicity. Except for two patients,toxicity was acceptable and clinically managable. One patient died ofneutropenic sepsis and one further patient developed grade III peripheralneurotoxicity that did not resolve within two months after chemotherapy hadbeen terminated. Overall objective response rate was 70%. The MTD forpaclitaxel was 185 mg/m² and AUC 6 for carboplatin,respectively. Secondary prophylaxis with G-CSF did not allow further doseescalation and therefore is not generally recommended.Conclusions: Paclitaxel 185 mg/m² given as three-hourinfusion followed by carboplatin AUC 6 is a feasible and safe regimen and canbe recommended for phase III trials. Observed response rates justify furtherevaluation of this combination. A randomized phase III trial comparing athree-hour infusion of paclitaxel 185 mg/m² combined witheither carboplatin AUC 6 or cisplatin 75 mg/m² as first-linechemotherapy of advanced ovarian cancer has recently been initiated by ourgroup.     

Ifosfamide,cisplatin, vinblastine combination chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Summary A total of 42 evaluable patients with previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with a combination of cisplatin (80 mg/m², day 1), vinblastine (5 mg/m², days 1 and 15), and ifosfamide (1.2 g/m², days 1–3). In all, 1 complete response and 15 partial responses were obtained, for an overall response rate of 38% (95% confidence limits, 23.6%–54.4%). The median duration of response was 15 weeks, and the median overall survival was 56 weeks. Toxicity mainly consisted of moderate to severe alopecia in 28 patients (67%), moderate to severe nausea and vomiting in 27 subjects (64%), and leukopenia comprising <1,000 leukocytes/mm³ in 6 cases (14%). In all, 16 patients (38%) had microscopic hematuria (WHO grade 1), but no hemorrhagic cystitis was documented. Although this three-drug combination appears to have moderate antitumor activity against nonsmall-cell lung cancer, the addition of ifosfamide to the combination of cisplatin and vinblastine did not seem to improve the response rate.     

High-dose chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Since more than thirty years, ovarian cancer is wellknown to be chemosensitive. However, long term results of advanced stages remain low with 5 years overall survival around 20%. That's why high-dose chemotherapy in this chemosensitive disease has to be considered. Here, authors report the french, european and american experiences in three clinical settings: first in consolidation after complete or very good partial response, second after relapse or for refractory disease, third as first line treatment to increase clinical and pathological complete responses and improve prognosis. The more promising results concern high-dose chemotherapy as consolidation setting. The preliminary results of the french multicentric randomized phase III study (high-dose versus conventional dose) gives a favorable trend for high-dose approach as consolidation. This unique trial would definitively establish the place of high-dose chemotherapy in the first line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.     

A gene signature predicting for survival in suboptimally debulked patients with ovarian cancer

Despite the existence of morphologically indistinguishable disease, patients with advanced ovarian tumors display a broad range of survival end points. We hypothesize that gene expression profiling can identify a prognostic signature accounting for these distinct clinical outcomes. To resolve survival-associated loci, gene expression profiling was completed for an extensive set of 185 (90 optimal/95 suboptimal) primary ovarian tumors using the Affymetrix human U133A microarray. Cox regression analysis identified probe sets associated with survival in optimally and suboptimally debulked tumor sets at a P value of <0.01. Leave-one-out cross-validation was applied to each tumor cohort and confirmed by a permutation test. External validation was conducted by applying the gene signature to a publicly available array database of expression profiles of advanced stage suboptimally debulked tumors. The prognostic signature successfully classified the tumors according to survival for suboptimally (P = 0.0179) but not optimally debulked (P = 0.144) patients. The suboptimal gene signature was validated using the independent set of tumors (odds ratio, 8.75; P = 0.0146). To elucidate signaling events amenable to therapeutic intervention in suboptimally debulked patients, pathway analysis was completed for the top 57 survival-associated probe sets. For suboptimally debulked patients, confirmation of the predictive gene signature supports the existence of a clinically relevant predictor, as well as the possibility of novel therapeutic opportunities. Ultimately, the prognostic classifier defined for suboptimally debulked tumors may aid in the classification and enhancement of patient outcome for this high-risk population.     

Ifosfamide, cisplatin, adriamycin combination chemotherapy in gynecologic cancer

Thirteen patients with gynecologic cancer were treated with ifosfamide (2 g X 5), cisplatin (70 mg/m2) and adriamycin (20 mg/m2) combination chemotherapy. The response rate of 7 evaluable patients was 43%, with a median duration of survival of 14 months. Six patients with non-measurable disease are currently free from disease with a median duration of survival of 18 months. This combination caused reversible myelosuppression. No hemorrhagic cystitis was observed.     

Cyclin E expression is a significant predictor of survival in advanced,suboptimally debulked ovarian epithelial cancers: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Cyclin E is a key regulator of the G(1)-S transition. Abnormalities in cyclin E expression have been related to survival in a variety of cancers. This study evaluated the prognostic relevance of cyclin E in human ovarian cancer. Immunohistochemical expression of cyclin E was evaluated in 139 advanced, suboptimally debulked epithelial ovarian cancer specimens from patients treated on Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 111. High cyclin E protein expression (> or =40% cyclin E positive tumor cells) was seen in 62 (45%) of the advanced, suboptimally debulked ovarian cancer patients. Expression of cyclin E was not associated with age, race, stage, grade, cell type, or amount of residual disease. High verses low cyclin E expression was associated with a shorter median survival (29 +/- 2 versus 35 +/- 3 months) and worse overall survival (P < 0.05). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses revealed that high relative to low cyclin E was associated with a 40-50% increase in the risk of death (hazard rate, P < or = 0.05). Fluorescence in situ hybridization was used in a subset of 20 cases to examine cyclin E gene amplification. Eight of 10 cases with high cyclin E expression exhibited amplification of the cyclin E gene, whereas only 1 of 10 cases with low expression displayed gene amplification (P < 0.006). High cyclin E expression was an independent poor prognostic factor for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, and it was associated with amplification of the cyclin E gene.     

Consolidation with intraperitoneal cisplatin in first-line therapy of advanced ovarian cancer

Seventy-five patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer were treated with a combined modality regimen of systemic, induction chemotherapy followed by intraperitoneal therapy (IPT). All patients underwent initial surgery for staging and/or cytoreduction followed by cisplatin 20 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) for 5 days and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 on day 4 every 3 to 4 weeks for two to four cycles. Patients were then evaluated for IPT and, if eligible, had an intraperitoneal (IP) catheter placed. IPT consisted of cisplatin 60 mg/m2 in 2 L on day 1 and IV cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 on day 2 every 3 weeks for three to six cycles. Patients who demonstrated a clinical complete response (CCR) were then referred for second-look laparotomy (SLL). Of 71 patients who completed the induction phase, 53 (75%) were eligible for IPT, and 49 patients entered the therapy phase. Toxicity of the combined modality approach was acceptable and did not differ from our previous experience using the same drugs systemically. Thirty-two of the 49 patients who completed IPT achieved a CCR, which was confirmed by SLL in 20 patients. Twenty recurrences were documented in the 32 CCR patients, 13 occurred in patients after SLL. Projected median survival of all patients is 38 months. Median survival correlated with amount of residual disease following initial surgery (23 months for bulky v 45 months for minimal residual; P less than .001) and with performance status ([PS]; 24 months for PS 2, 3 v greater than 46 months for PS O; P less than .001). Patients who presented with bulky tumors were less likely to reach the consolidation IPT phase. Incorporation of IP cisplatin into the first-line regimen for treatment of ovarian cancer does not appear to have major impact on the survival of all treated patients when compared with our historical control series. Combined IV and IPT cisplatin and cyclophosphamide is feasible with acceptable toxicity. Its impact on response and survival may be limited to only "good-prognosis" patients.     

Intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatin in epithelial ovarian cancer

Objective

To assess retrospectively the feasibility of intraoperative intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy with cisplatin in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Methods

IP chemotherapy during optimal staging surgery was performed in 10 patients who were diagnosed with primary epithelial ovarian cancers between April 2008 and February 2011. Cisplatin (70 mg/m² in 1 L normal saline solution) was administered in the abdominal cavity for 24 hours postoperatively and then adjuvant chemotherapy was started 2-4 weeks after surgery. Perioperative toxicity of the combined treatment was evaluated until the initiation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

A total of 23 adverse events were observed in 9 of 10 patients (grade 1, 7; grade 2, 13; grade 3, 3; grade 4, 0). In descending order of frequency, adverse events affected the gastrointestinal system (n=14), hematologic system (n=6), pulmonary system (n=2), and genito-urinary system (n=1). The adverse events did not affect adjuvant systemic chemotherapy schedules. One patient experienced disease recurrence in the liver 16 months after surgery. The remaining 9 patients have been well controlled by chemotherapy and/or observation during the follow-up period of 4 to 39 months after surgery.

Conclusion

Intraoperative IP chemotherapy with cisplatin during surgical procedures is considered feasible for the treatment of primary epithelial ovarian cancer. Further studies, including long-term, prospective and comparative trials, are needed to validate the efficacy of this combined therapy.