LC联合ERCP和EST治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石患者疗效研究

目的 分析比较内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)联合内窥镜下括约肌切开术(EST)后何时进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石患者更有效且安全。方法 2019年4月～2022年4月我院收治的65例胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石患者,被随机分为两组,均首先接受ERCP联合EST术治疗,其中35例观察组患者在ERCP联合EST术后48h内行LC术,另30例对照组患者在ERCP联合EST术后48～72 h内行LC术。采用免疫比浊法检测血清C反应蛋白(CRP),采用ELISA法检测血清肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和白介素-6(IL-6)水平。结果 观察组术中出血量、术后住院日和住院费用分别为(15.6±2.3)ml、(8.3±0.9)d和(1.9±0.2)万元,显著少于或短于对照组【分别为(34.7±4.1)ml、(12.3±1.5)d和(2.4±0.3)万元,P<0.05】,而两组LC手术时间、中转开腹率和结石清除率比较,无显著性差异(P>0.05);术前术后,两组血清TBIL、AST、ALT和ALB水平无显著性差异(P>0.05);术后,观察组外周血WBC计...     

LC联合ERCP治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石患者疗效研究*

目的 探讨采用腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)联合内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石患者的疗效。方法 2018年3月～2022年3月我科收治的142例胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石患者,其中71例对照组患者接受传统的开腹手术,在另71例观察组患者行LC联合ERCP术治疗。采用免疫比浊法检测血清C反应蛋白(CRP)水平,采用固相免疫色谱法检测血清降钙素原(PCT)水平,采用双抗体一步夹心法检测血清白介素-6(IL-6)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平。结果 观察组手术时间、术中出血量、疼痛评分和住院日和分别为(92.3±8.7)min、(47.9±5.2)mL、(3.8±0.4)分和(5.2±2.3)d,显著少于或短于对照组【分别为(116.4±10.2)min、(76.5±6.4)mL、(4.1±0.5)分和(7.1±2.6)d,P<0.05】,而医疗花费为(3.4±0.4)万元,显著高于对照组【(2.7±0.3)万元,P<0.05】;在术后3 d,观察组血清CRP、IL-6和TNF-α水平分别为(48.4±2.9)mg/L、(9.7±1.2)ng/L和(1.3±0.2)ng/L,显著低于对照组【分别为(61.7±3.1)mg/L、(14.3±1.6)ng/L和(2.4±0.2)ng/L,P<0.05】;术后,观察组并发症,如急性胰腺炎、出血、感染和胆漏发生率为11.3%,显著低于对照组的23.9%(P<0.05)。结论 采用LC联合ERCP治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石患者可有效改善手术相关指标,保证结石清除率,促进术后恢复。     

逆行胰胆管造影、乳头括约肌切开配合腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆石症

为治疗伴有或可疑伴有胆总管结石的胆囊结石病人，在对胆囊结石病人行腹腔镜胆囊切除术（ＬＣ）时，对ＬＣ术前可疑伴有胆总管继发性结石的１４２例病人（术前组）和ＬＣ术后可疑胆总管残留结石的３９例病人（术后组）选择性地行逆行性胰胆管造影（ＥＲＣＰ）检查和乳头括约肌切开术（ＥＳＴ）治疗。结果：术前组ＥＲＣＰ发现胆总管继发结石６５例，ＥＳＴ清除结石６０例，清除率９１．５％；术后组ＥＲＣＰ发现胆总管残留结石６例，ＥＳＴ清除结石５例。结果提示ＥＲＣＰ、ＥＳＴ配合ＬＣ治疗伴有胆总管结石的胆囊结石病人是一种安全有效的好方法，明显减少了ＬＣ的并发症和胆总管结石开腹手术的比例。     

内镜十二指肠乳头切开联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石并胆总管结石

目的探讨运用腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合内镜十二指肠乳头切开术治疗胆囊结石并胆总管结石的方法。方法对胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者,92例行开腹胆囊切除 胆总管切开取石、T管引流术,86例行内镜下十二指肠乳头切开术(EST) 腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)。比较两种术式的临床效果、住院时间、并发症等。结果开腹组术中结石取净率为94.8%,住院时间为23.8±7.6d,术后并发胆瘘2例,肝功能衰竭1例,腹腔感染3例,肺部感染1例。内镜组有4例取石失败,改行开腹手术,余均取石成功,取石成功率为94%,住院时间为10.2±5.3d,并发胆道感染2例,十二指肠乳头出血3例。结论与传统开腹胆囊切除 胆总管切开取石、T管引流术相比,EST LC治疗胆囊结石并胆总管结石具有创伤小、住院时间短、患者恢复快、并发症少等优点,临床效果可靠。EST与LC的联合应用可替代大部分开腹胆囊切除 胆总管切开取石、T管引流术。     

内镜十二指肠乳头切开术治疗十二指肠乳头旁憩室合并胆总管结石

目的 探讨内镜乳头括约肌切开术(EST)对十二指肠乳头旁憩室合并胆总管结石治疗的方法及价值.方法 我院2005年1月至2009年4月282例EST病例,其中38例为十二指肠乳头旁憩室合并胆总管结石患者,回顾性分析十二指肠憩室对这些病例的ERCP成功率、EST及其并发症的影响.结果 该组38例十二指肠乳头旁憩室合并胆总管...     

内镜下乳头括约肌小切开术联合球囊扩张术治疗非扩张性肝外胆管结石患者疗效再研究

目的 分析采取内镜下乳头括约肌小切开术(EST)联合球囊扩张术(EPBD)治疗非扩张性肝外胆管结石患者的疗效及其血清淀粉酶(AMS)和环氧合酶-2(COX-2)水平的变化。方法 2017年7月～2019年5月我院肝胆外科收治的120例非扩张性肝外胆管结石患者,其中60例接受EST治疗,另60例接受EST联合EPBD治疗。结果 在术后7 d,联合组外周血白细胞(WBC)计数为(7.8±1.4)×10⁹/L,与对照组的(7.6±1.2)×10⁹/L比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),血清COX-2水平为(45.3±11.7)ng/mL,与对照组的(49.6±15.2)ng/mL比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),血降钙素原(PCT)水平为(0.4±0.3)μg/L,与对照组的(0.4±0.2)μg/L比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),C反应蛋白(CRP)水平为(8.7±2.9)mg/L,与对照组的(8.4±3.2)mg/L比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平为(0.5±0.2)ng/mL,与对照组的(0.5±0.2)ng/mL比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),血清AMS水平为(60.1±16.7)U/L,与对照组的(58.7±15.3)U/L比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后,联合组并发症发生率为25.0%,与对照组的31.7%比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);联合组一次取石成功率为98.3%,显著高于对照组的86.7%,机械碎石率为5.0%和结石复发率为3.3%, 则均显著低于对照组(分别为16.7%和15.0%,P<0.05)。结论 EST联合EPBD治疗非扩张性肝外胆管结石患者能一次取净结石,而在EPBD的协助下不会加剧机体炎症反应,降低术后结石复发,值得临床进一步研究。     

十二指肠镜下乳头括约肌切开术及气囊扩张术治疗非扩张性肝外胆管结石的疗效分析

目的 比较十二指肠镜下乳头括约肌切开术(EST)、十二指肠镜下乳头气囊扩张术(EPBD)以及EST+EPBD治疗非扩张性肝外胆管结石的临床疗效和安全性。方法 回顾性分析2020年9月至2022年1月因非扩张性肝外胆管结石在山西医科大学第一医院行内镜下治疗的患者118例,根据手术方式将患者分为EST组(n=45)、EPBD组(n=35)和EST+EPBD组(n=38),比较三组患者术后近、远期并发症的发生率、围术期指标、治疗前与治疗后7 d的相关血清学指标。结果 EPBD组高淀粉酶血症、胰腺炎发生率高于EST组(40.0%vs 15.6%,42.9%vs 13.3%,均P<0.05);EPBD组高淀粉酶血症、胰腺炎发生率高于EST+EPBD组(40.0%vs 10.5%,42.9%vs 13.2%,均P<0.05);三组术后穿孔、出血、胆道感染发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);EST+EPBD组胆道逆行感染、结石复发发生率低于EST组(5.3%vs 26.7%,2.6%vs 20.0%,均P<0.05)。EST+EPBD组一次取石成功率高于EST组(...     

十二指肠乳头切开术联合球囊扩张术在肝外胆管结石内镜治疗中的作用

目的 探讨十二指肠乳头切开术(EST)联合十二指肠乳头球囊扩张术(EPBD)在肝外胆管结石内镜治疗中的安全性及其疗效.方法 164例肝外胆管结石患者接受内镜取石治疗,其中78例取石前进行EST联合EPBD治疗(EST+ EPBD组),其余86例取石前进行单一EST治疗(EST组),对比分析2组并发症发生率、结石取净率和碎石发生率.结果 EST+ EPBD组出现高淀粉酶血症3例、轻症急性胰腺炎2例,EST组出现高淀粉酶血症5例、轻症急性胰腺炎3例、出血2例,2组均未出现重症急性胰腺炎、穿孔等严重并发症.EST+ EPBD组并发症发生率为6.4％( 5/78),略低于EST组的11.6％ (10/86)(x2=1.340,P=0.288);结石取净率为100.0％ (78/78),明显高于EST组的93.0％( 80/86)(x2=5.649,P=0.030);碎石发生率为33.3％( 26/78),明显低于EST组的60.5％(52/86)(x2=12.073,P=0.001).结论 EST联合EPBD应用肝外胆管结石内镜治疗中安全、有效,对于结石大、乳头条件差的患者效果尤其明显.     

内镜逆行胰胆管造影十二指肠乳头括约肌切开取石诊治胆总管结石163例体会

目的探讨内镜逆行胰胆管造影（ERCP）十二指肠乳头括约肌切开（EST）诊断、治疗胆总管结石的临床效果和价值。方法163例临床诊断胆总管结石者行ERCP检查，造影成功159例，150例确诊为胆总管结石并经内镜行乳头括约肌切开术。结果胆总管结石ERCP与临床诊断符合率为94．3％；胆总管结石150例，取石成功141例，成功率94．0％；EST术后发生急性胰腺炎4例，少到中等量肠道出血3例，高淀粉酶血症5例，无肠穿孔、大出血及死亡等并发症发生。结论ERCP可提高胆管结石的诊断准确率；EST取石是肝外胆管结石治疗的优良方法，对已作胆囊切除后肝外胆管残留或复发结石并应为首选治疗方法。     

腹腔镜联合十二指肠镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆管结石临床研究

对50例患者常规行内镜胰胆管逆行造影术(ERCP)发现胆总管结石后,即行十二指肠镜乳头括约肌切开术(EST) 网篮取石,根据EST术后并发症治愈的情况再行联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC).结果 全部病例EST均获成功,结石全部取出,术后出现胰腺炎1例,胆管炎1例,治疗1周痊愈,发现2例Mirrizi综合征行开腹手术.认为EST联合LC治疗胆囊并胆总管结石具有创伤小、效果好、并发症少、恢复快等优点,该微创治疗方法扩大了LC的指征,可在临床推广应用.     

三镜联合分期手术与腹腔镜手术治疗老年胆总管结石合并胆囊结石患者疗效对比研究

目的 探讨采用三镜联合分期手术与全腹腔镜同期手术治疗老年结石性胆道梗阻并发不同程度急性胆管炎患者的效果。方法 回顾性分析青岛市第三人民医院收治的老年胆总管结石伴急性胆管炎合并胆囊结石患者75例,其中35例观察组患者在入院后急诊行ERCP术,取出胆总管结石或留置胆管支架引流,择期再次入院行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)或LC联合腹腔镜下胆总管取石术(LCBDE),40例对照组患者入院后急诊行LC联合LCBDE术。结果 观察组两次手术时间显著长于对照组(P<0.05),但术中出血量显著少于对照组(P<0.05);手术后观察组WBC计数、NEUT百分比、血清CRP和PCT水平均显著低于对照组(P<0.05);术后,观察组血清脑钠肽(BNP)和CK水平分别为(427.0±327.0)pg/ml和(95.0±30.0)U/L,显著低于对照组【分别为(944.0±648.0)pg/ml和(149.0±67.0)U/L,P<0.05】,而血清肌钙蛋白(TNT)和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平分别为(62.8±54.5)pg/ml和(272.0±48.0)U/L,显著高于对照组【分别为(3...     

一步法和分步法治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者疗效及并发症分析

目的 探讨一步法与分步法手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者的疗效.方法 2016年1月～2019年6月我院诊治的胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者152例,其中87例接受一步法手术,即行腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)和胆总管探查取石(LCBDE)术,65例接受分步法手术,即行内镜逆行胰胆管造影/乳头括约肌切开(ERCP/EST)和LC...     

Comparison of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones

Endoscopic treatment for bile duct stones is low-invasive and currently considered as the first choice of the treatment. For the treatment of bile duct stones, papillary treatment is necessary, and the treatments used at the time are broadly classified into two types; endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation where bile duct closing part is dilated with a balloon and endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST) where bile duct closing part is incised. Both procedures have advantages and disadvantages. Golden standard is EST, however, there are patients with difficulty for EST, thus we must select the procedure based on understanding of the characteristics of the procedure, and patient backgrounds.     

A phantom gallbladder on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Various complications have been related to laparoscopic cholecystectomy but most occur shortly after the procedure. In this report, we present a case with very late complications in which an abscess developed within the gallbladder fossa 6 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The abscess resolved after treatment with CT-guided extrahepatic aspiration. However, 4 years later, an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography （ERCP） performed for choledocholithiasis demonstrated a “gallbladder” which communicated with the common bile duct via a patent cystic duct. This unique case indicates that a cystic duct stump may communicate with the gallbladder fossa many years following cholecystectomy.     

EST术联合EPBD术治疗非扩张性肝外胆管结石患者临床研究*

目的 探讨采用十二指肠镜下乳头括约肌切开（EST）联合十二指肠镜下乳头气囊扩张（EPBD）术治疗非扩张性肝外胆管结石患者的临床效果。方法 回顾性分析我院诊治的124例非扩张性肝外胆管结石患者的临床资料,联合组采用EST术联合EPBD术（n=49）、观察组采用单纯EST术（n=31）和对照组采用胆总管切开T管引流术（n=44）治疗。结果 术后48 h时,联合组血清淀粉酶水平为（107.1±34.6） U/L,超敏C-反应蛋白水平为（37.2±8.9） mg/L,观察组分别为（113.9±35.2） U/L和（38.1±9.4） mg/L,均显著低于对照组[分别为（221.5±54.8） U/L和（73.2±16.2） mg/L,P<0.05];联合组手术时间为（95.2±14.8） min,观察组为（113.6±12.7） min,均显著长于对照组[（84.8±12.1）,P<0.05];联合组胰腺炎和反流性胆管炎发生率分别为2.0%和4.1%,显著低于观察组的19.4%和22.6%或对照组的18.2%和22.7%（P<0.05）。结论 采用EST联合EPBD术治疗非扩张性肝外胆管结石患者操作易行,效果好,术后恢复快,近远期并发症发生率低,有较高的临床应用价值。     

Small sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs sphincterotomy alone for removal of common bile duct stones

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary large diameter balloon dilation (EPLBD) following limited endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and EST alone for removal of large common bile duct (CBD) stones.METHODS: We retrospectively compared EST + EPLBD (group A, n = 64) with EST alone (group B, n = 89) for the treatment of large or multiple bile duct stones. The success rate of stone clearance, procedure-related complications and incidents, frequency of mechanical lithotripsy use, and recurrent stones were recorded.RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding periampullary diverticula (35.9% vs 34.8%, P > 0.05), pre-cut sphincterotomy (6.3% vs 6.7%, P > 0.05), size (12.1 ± 2.0 mm vs 12.9 ± 2.6 mm, P > 0.05) and number (2.2 ± 1.9 vs 2.4 ± 2.1, P > 0.05) of stones or the diameters of CBD (15.1 ± 3.3 mm vs 15.4 ± 3.6 mm, P > 0.05). The rates of overall stone removal and stone removal in the first session were not significantly different between the two groups [62/64 (96.9%) vs 84/89 (94.4%), P > 0.05; and 58/64 (90.6%) vs 79/89 (88.8%), P > 0.05, respectively]. The rates of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia were not significantly different between the two groups [3/64 (4.7%) vs 4/89 (4.5%), P > 0.05; 7/64 (10.9%) vs 9/89 (10.1%), P > 0.05, respectively]. There were no cases of perforation, acute cholangitis, or cholecystitis in the two groups. The rate of bleeding and the recurrence of CBD stones were significantly lower in group A than in group B [1/64 (1.6%) vs 5/89 (5.6%), P < 0.05; 1/64 (1.6%) vs 6/89 (6.7%), P < 0.05, respectively].CONCLUSION: EST + EPLBD is an effective and safe endoscopic approach for removing large or multiple CBD stones.     

Endoscopic papillary balloon intermittent dilatation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones

AIM: To compare the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic papillary balloon intermittent dilatation (EPBID) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) in the treatment of common bile duct stones. METHODS: From March 2011 to May 2012, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed in 560 patients, 262 with common bile duct stones. A total of 206 patients with common bile duct stones were enrolled in the study and randomized to receive either EPBID with a 10-12 mm dilated balloon or EST (103 patients in each group). For both groups a conventional reticular basket or balloon was used to remove the stones. After the procedure, routine endoscopic nasobiliary drainage was performed. RESULTS: First-time stone removal was successfully performed in 94 patients in the EPBID group (91.3%) and 75 patients in the EST group (72.8%). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of operation time between the two groups. The overall incidence of early complications in the EPBID and EST groups was 2.9% and 13.6%, respectively, with no deaths reported during the course of the study and follow-up. Multiple regression analysis showed that the success rate of stone removal was associated with stone removal method [odds ratio (OR): 5.35; 95%CI: 2.24-12.77; P=0.00], the transverse diameter of the stone (OR: 2.63; 95%CI: 1.19-5.80; P=0.02) and the presence or absence of diverticulum (OR: 2.35; 95%CI: 1.03-5.37; P=0.04). Postoperative pancreatitis was associated with the EST method of stone removal (OR: 5.00; 95%CI: 1.23-20.28; P=0.02) and whether or not pancreatography was performed (OR: 0.10; 95%CI: 0.03-0.35; P=0.00). CONCLUSION: The EPBID group had a higher success rate of stone removal with a lower incidence of pancreatitis compared with the EST group.