Intravenous regional anesthesia using lidocaine and clonidine.

BACKGROUND: Clonidine has been added to local anesthetic regimens for various peripheral nerve blocks, resulting in prolonged anesthesia and analgesia. The authors postulated that using clonidine as a component of intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) would enhance postoperative analgesia. METHODS: Forty-five patients undergoing ambulatory hand surgery received IVRA with lidocaine, 0.5%, and were assigned randomly and blindly to three groups. The control group received intravenous saline, the intravenous clonidine group received 1 microg/kg clonidine intravenously, and the IVRA clonidine group received 1 microg/kg clonidine as part of the IVRA solution. After their operations, the patients' pain and sedation scores and analgesic use were recorded. RESULTS: Patients in the IVRA clonidine group had a significantly longer period of subjective comfort when they required no analgesics (median [range]) for 460 min (215-1,440 min), compared with 115 min (14-390 min) for the control group and 125 min (17-295 min) for the intravenous clonidine group (P<0.0001). The patients who received IVRA with clonidine reported significantly lower pain scores 1 and 2 h after tourniquet deflation compared with the other groups, and they required no fentanyl in the postanesthesia care unit. They also required fewer analgesic tablets (325 mg acetaminophen with 30 mg codeine) in the first 24 h (2+/-1, mean +/- SD) compared with the other two groups, 5+/-1 tablets (control) and 4+/-2 tablets (intravenous clonidine) (P<0.0001). No significant postoperative sedation, hypotension, or bradycardia developed in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: The addition of 1 microg/kg clonidine to lidocaine, 0.5%, for IVRA in patients undergoing ambulatory hand surgery improves postoperative analgesia without causing significant side effects during the first postoperative day.     

An evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of intravenous regional anesthesia with lidocaine and ketorolac using a forearm versus upper arm tourniquet

Intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) using a forearm tourniquet may be a potentially safer technique compared with using an upper arm tourniquet. Ketorolac is a useful adjuvant to lidocaine for IVRA. In this study, we assessed the analgesic efficacy of administering IVRA lidocaine and ketorolac with either a forearm or upper arm tourniquet for outpatient hand surgery. Upper arm IVRA was established using 40 mL of a solution containing 200 mg of lidocaine and ketorolac 20 mg (0.5 mg/mL). Forearm IVRA was established using 20 mL of a solution containing 100 mg of lidocaine and ketorolac 10 mg (0.5 mg/mL). Onset and duration of sensory block as well as postoperative pain and analgesic use were recorded. The patients who received forearm IVRA had a significantly longer period during which they required no analgesics (701 +/- 133 min) compared with 624 +/- 80 min for the upper arm IVRA ketorolac patients (P = 0.032). Onset of sensory block was similar between the two groups; however, recovery of sensation was significantly longer in the Forearm IVRA (22 +/- 5 min) group compared with the Upper Arm IVRA (13 +/- 3 min) group (P < 0.05). There were no differences in postoperative analgesic use or pain scores between the two groups. We conclude that forearm IVRA with lidocaine and ketorolac provides safe and effective perioperative analgesia for patients undergoing ambulatory hand surgery. This technique results in a longer duration of sensory block and prolonged postoperative analgesia compared with upper arm IVRA while using one-half the doses of both lidocaine and ketorolac. IMPLICATIONS: Forearm tourniquet intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) with 50% less lidocaine and ketorolac provides for both a longer duration of sensory block and prolonged postoperative analgesia compared with upper arm IVRA.     

Quality of lidocaine analgesia with and without midazolam for intravenous regional anesthesia

Purpose

Midazolam has analgesic effects mediated by gamma aminobutyric acid-A receptors. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of midazolam on anesthesia and analgesia quality when added to lidocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA).

Methods

Forty patients undergoing hand surgery were randomly assigned to two groups to receive IVRA. The control group received 3 mg/kg lidocaine 2% w/v diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 ml, and the midazolam group received an additional 50 μg/kg midazolam. Sensory and motor block onset and recovery times, tourniquet pain, intraoperative analgesic requirements, sedation, and anesthesia quality were recorded. Postoperative pain and sedation scores, time to first analgesic requirements, analgesic use in the first 24 h, and side effects were noted.

Results

Sensory and motor block onset and recovery times did not differ significantly between groups. Tourniquet pain scores were lower at 10, 15, 20, and 30 min (P < 0.0001) in the midazolam group. Three (15%) patients in the midazolam group required fentanyl for tourniquet pain compared with thirteen (65%) patients in the control group (P = 0.02). Patients in both groups received fentanyl once. Midazolam group showed that significantly less patients required diclofenac for postoperative analgesia (P < 0.01) and analgesic-free period during first postoperative 24 h was significantly longer (726.8 ± 662.8 min vs. 91.0 ± 35.9 min, P < 0.0001). Postoperative pain scores were lower (P < 0.0001) and sedation scores higher (P < 0.05) for the first 2 h in the midazolam group.

Conclusion

Addition of midazolam to lidocaine for IVRA improves anesthesia quality and enhances intraoperative and postoperative analgesia without causing side effects.     

Adding dexmedetomidine to lidocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia

Dexmedetomidine is approximately 8 times more selective toward the alpha-2-adrenoceptors than clonidine. It decreases anesthetic requirements by up to 90% and induces analgesia in patients. We designed this study to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine when added to lidocaine in IV regional anesthesia (IVRA). We investigated onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks, the quality of the anesthesia, intraoperative-postoperative hemodynamic variables, and intraoperative-postoperative pain and sedation. Thirty patients undergoing hand surgery were randomly assigned to 2 groups to receive IVRA. They received 40 mL of 0.5% lidocaine and either 1 mL of isotonic saline (group L, n = 15) or 0.5 microg/kg dexmedetomidine (group LD, n = 15). Sensory and motor block onset and recovery times and anesthesia quality were noted. Before and after the tourniquet application at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 40 min, hemodynamic variables, tourniquet pain and sedation, and analgesic use were recorded. After the tourniquet deflation, at 30 min, and 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h, hemodynamic variables, pain and sedation values, time to first analgesic requirement, analgesic use, and side effects were noted. Shortened sensory and motor block onset times, prolonged sensory and motor block recovery times, prolonged tolerance for the tourniquet, and improved quality of anesthesia were found in group LD. Visual analog scale scores were significantly less in group LD in the intraoperative period and 30 min, and 2, 4, and 6 h after tourniquet release. Intra-postoperative analgesic requirements were significantly less in group LD. Time to first analgesic requirements was significantly longer in group LD in the postoperative period. We conclude that the addition of 0.5 microg/kg dexmedetomidine to lidocaine for IVRA improves quality of anesthesia and perioperative analgesia without causing side effects. IMPLICATIONS: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine when added to lidocaine for IV regional anesthesia. This is the first clinical study demonstrating that the addition of 0.5 microg/kg dexmedetomidine to lidocaine for IV regional anesthesia improves quality of anesthesia and intraoperative-postoperative analgesia without causing side effects.     

Epidural Clonidine Used as the Sole Analgesic Agent during and after Abdominal Surgery: A Dose-Response Study

Background: Many studies have shown the beneficial effect of epidural clonidine in postoperative pain management. In these studies, the patients received local anesthetics, opioids, or both in combination with clonidine. Due to the interactive potentiation of those drugs, the importance of the intrinsic analgesic properties of the alpha2 -adrenoceptor agonist is difficult to establish. The authors investigated the analgesic potency of epidural clonidine when used as the sole analgesic agent during and after major abdominal surgery.

Methods: Fifty young adult patients undergoing intestinal surgery under general anesthesia with propofol were studied. At induction, the patients received epidurally either an initial dose of 2 micro gram/kg clonidine followed by an infusion of 0.5 micro gram [center dot] kg-1 [center dot] h-1 (group 1, n = 10) or 4 micro gram/kg followed by 1 micro gram [center dot] kg-1 [center dot] h-1 (group 2, n = 20) or 8 micro gram [center dot] kg-1 [center dot] h-1 followed by an infusion of 2 micro gram [center dot] kg-1 [center dot] h-1 (group 3, n = 20). During the operation, increases in arterial blood pressure or heart rate that did not respond to a propofol bolus (0.5 mg/kg) were treated with a bolus of intravenous lidocaine (1 mg/kg). Three successive injections were allowed. When baseline values were not restored, opioids were added and the patient was removed from the study. After operation, the clonidine infusions were maintained for 12 h. During this period and at every 30 min, sedation scores and visual analog scale values at rest and at cough were noted. In case of subjective scores up to 5 cm at rest or up to 8 cm at cough, the patients were given access to a patient-controlled analgesia device that delivered epidural bupivacaine. The end point of the study was reached once the patient activated the analgesic delivery button.

Results: During surgery, 60% of patients in group 1 compared with 33% of patients in group 2 and only 5% of patients in group 3 were removed from the study protocol because of inadequate anesthesia (P < 0.05). After operation, epidural clonidine provided complete analgesia lasting 30 +/- 21 min in group 1 compared with 251 + 237 min in group 2 or 369 +/- 256 min in group 3 (P < 0.05 for group 1 vs. groups 2 and 3 and group 2 vs. group 3).     

Epidural Administration of Neostigmine and Clonidine to Induce Labor Analgesia: Evaluation of Efficacy and Local Anesthetic-sparing Effect

Background: Epidural clonidine produces analgesia without motor impairment, and is associated with a local anesthetic-sparing effect during labor. The authors have recently demonstrated that epidural neostigmine initiates selective labor analgesia devoid of adverse effects. Both drugs possess common analgesic mechanisms mediated through spinal acetylcholine release. This study evaluates their epidural combination in parturients.

Methods: At the beginning of labor, parturients were randomly allocated to one of five groups to receive one of the following after a test dose: 150 [mu]g epidural clonidine, 750 [mu]g neostigmine, or 75 [mu]g clonidine combined with 250, 500, or 750 [mu]g neostigmine. A pain score (visual analog scale, 0-100) was recorded before administration and at regular intervals until request for a supplemental injection. Subsequent analgesia was provided by continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine.

Results: Parturients did not differ regarding demographic data and initial pain score. Clonidine 150 [mu]g, neostigmine 750 [mu]g, and 75 [mu]g clonidine plus 250 [mu]g neostigmine produced ineffective and short-lasting effects. Clonidine 75 [mu]g plus 500 [mu]g neostigmine and 75 [mu]g clonidine plus 750 [mu]g neostigmine presented comparable durations of 90 +/- 32 and 108 +/- 38 min (mean +/- SD), respectively, and final analgesic efficacies, with 72.2% and 84%, respectively, of the parturients reporting a visual analog scale score of less than 30 out of 100 after 30 min. Ropivacaine use was significantly reduced in all clonidine groups (average, 9.5 mg/h) in comparison with neostigmine alone (17 +/- 3 mg/h). No adverse effects were observed for 75 [mu]g clonidine combined with any dose of neostigmine while maternal sedation (20%) and hypotension (33%) occurred with 150 [mu]g clonidine alone.     

Intrathecal Ropivacaine and Clonidine for Ambulatory Knee Arthroscopy: A Dose-Response Study

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of a small dose of intrathecal ropivacaine with small doses of intrathecal clonidine for ambulatory surgery.

Methods: One hundred twenty patients, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and scheduled for knee arthroscopy, were studied. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 4 ml of one of the following double-blinded isobaric intrathecal solutions: 8 mg of ropivacaine (group 1; n =30); 8 mg ropivacaine plus 15 [mu]g clonidine (group 2; n =30); 8 mg ropivacaine plus 45 [mu]g clonidine (group 3; n =30); and 8 mg ropivacaine plus 75 [mu]g clonidine (group 4; n =30). The level and duration of sensory anesthesia were recorded, along with the intensity and duration of motor block. Patient and surgeon were interviewed to evaluate the quality of anesthesia.

Results: Intrathecal ropivacaine (8 mg alone) produced short sensory anesthesia and motor blockade (132 +/- 38 min and 110 +/- 35 min; mean +/- SD). However, the quality of anesthesia was significantly lower than in any other group (P < 0.05). Ropivacaine (8 mg) plus 75 [mu]g clonidine produced significantly longer sensory and motor anesthesia (195 +/- 40 min and 164 +/- 38 min;P < 0.05). However, this was associated with systemic effects, such as sedation and reduction of arterial blood pressure. Ropivacaine (8 mg) plus 15 [mu]g clonidine did not prolong sensory or motor blockade, afforded high quality anesthesia, and was not associated with detectable systemic effects.     

Intravenous but not perineural clonidine prolongs postoperative analgesia after psoas compartment block with 0.5% levobupivacaine for hip fracture surgery

We evaluated the systemic and local effects of clonidine as an analgesic adjunct to psoas compartment block (PCB) with levobupivacaine. In a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial, 36 patients requiring hip fracture surgery received PCB and general anesthesia. Patients were randomized into three groups. Each patient received PCB with 0.4 mL/kg of levobupivacaine 0.5%. The control group (group L) received IV saline, the systemic clonidine group (group IC) received IV clonidine 1 mug/kg, and the peripheral clonidine group (group C) received IV saline and PCB with clonidine 1 microg/kg. The interval from time of completion of block injection to first supplementary analgesic administration was longer in group IC compared with group L (mean +/- sd, 13.4 +/- 6.1 versus 7.3 +/- 3.6 h; P = 0.03). There was no difference between group C and group L (10.3 +/- 5.9 versus 7.3 +/- 3.6 h; P > 0.05). The groups were similar in terms of 24 h cumulative morphine and acetaminophen consumption. There were no significant differences among groups regarding postoperative adverse effects (bradycardia, hypotension, sedation, and nausea). We conclude that IV but not perineural clonidine (1 microg/kg) prolongs analgesia after PCB without increasing the incidence of adverse effects.     

Does dexamethasone improve the quality of intravenous regional anesthesia and analgesia? A randomized, controlled clinical study

We investigated the anesthetic and analgesic effectiveness of adding dexamethasone to lidocaine for IV regional anesthesia (IVRA). Seventy-five patients undergoing ambulatory hand surgery were randomly assigned to one of three groups: group L received 3 mg/kg lidocaine, group LD received 3 mg/kg lidocaine + 8 mg dexamethasone, and group LDc received 3 mg/kg lidocaine for IVRA and 8 mg dexamethasone IV to the nonsurgical arm. IVRA was established using 40 mL of a solution. Visual analog scale and verbal pain scores were recorded intraoperatively and for 2 h postoperatively. Postoperative pain was treated with oral acetaminophen 500 mg every 4 h when visual analog scale score was more than 3. Time to request for the first analgesic and the total dose in the first 24 h were noted. Times to onset of complete sensory and motor block were similar in the 3 groups. The times to recovery of motor block (L = 8 [5.91-10.08] min, LD = 13 [6.76-20.19] min, LDc = 6 [4.44-8.43] min) and sensory block (L = 7 [5.21-10.30] min, LD = 12 [6.11-19.40] min and LDc = 6 [4.2-8.11] min) were longer in group LD (P < 0.05). Patients in group LD reported significantly lower pain scores and required less acetaminophen in the first 24 h after surgery. In conclusion, the addition of 8 mg dexamethasone to lidocaine for IVRA in patients undergoing hand surgery improves postoperative analgesia during the first postoperative day.     

Comparison of anesthetic effect between 0.375% ropivacaine versus 0.5% lidocaine in forearm intravenous regional anesthesia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ropivacaine was shown to provide superior postblock analgesia to lidocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) in voluntary studies. The objective of this study was to compare the anesthesia efficacy, postblock analgesia, and local anesthetic-related side effects between ropivacaine and lidocaine when forearm IVRA was used. METHODS: Fifty-one patients undergoing outpatient hand surgery were randomized to receive forearm IVRA with either ropivacaine 0.375% or lidocaine 0.5%. The volume was 0.4 mL/kg up to 25 mL. Sensation to pinching by forceps and motor function was assessed at 5-minute intervals up to 15 minutes. After tourniquet deflation, verbal pain rating score (VRPS) at 15-minute intervals for the first 2 hours and time for first analgesic in the first 24 hours were evaluated. RESULTS: Eleven patients were excluded from the study with 20 patients remaining in each group. Onset time of anesthesia (6.5 +/- 2.9 minutes v 8.0 +/- 4.1 minutes for lidocaine and ropivacaine groups, respectively) and motor block were similar. In the postoperative period, VPRS was significantly lower in the ropivacaine group in the first 60 minutes (median, 0; P <.05) with significantly more patients in the ropivacaine group pain free (VPRS, 0) up to the first 90 minutes (P >.05). More patients in lidocaine group requested analgesic in the first 2 hours postblock, and only patients in the lidocaine group required supplemental IV morphine in the recovery room. Twenty-four hour analgesic consumption was the same. No local anesthetic-related side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that 0.375% ropivacaine provides effective anesthesia and superior postoperative analgesia compared with 0.5% lidocaine when forearm IVRA is used.     

Fast-track coronary artery bypass grafting surgery under general anesthesia with remifentanil and spinal analgesia with morphine and clonidine

OBJECTIVE: Effective postoperative analgesia is a critical part of fast-track cardiac surgery. This study compared the postoperative analgesic effect of fast-track anesthesia with remifentanil and spinal morphine and clonidine with that of sufentanil anesthesia followed by patient-controlled administration of intravenous morphine. DESIGN: Prospective, blinded, randomized study. SETTING: Single private institution. PARTICIPANTS: Forty patients selected for coronary artery bypass graft surgery allocated randomly into 2 groups. INTERVENTIONS: General anesthesia was performed with etomidate, isoflurane, cisatracurium, and either remifentanil (0.10-0.25 microg/kg/min) or sufentanil (up to 3.5 microg/kg). In the remifentanil group, patients received spinal morphine (4 microg/kg) and clonidine (1 microg/kg) before induction. Postoperatively, patients in both groups were connected to an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine pump that delivered a 1-g bolus with a 7-minute lockout interval. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were evaluated for pain on a visual analog scale (VAS), at rest and on deep breathing, and for intravenous PCA morphine consumption during 24 hours. The intravenous PCA morphine 24-hour cumulative dose was lower in the fast-track than in the control group (15.8+/-12.6 v 32.7+/-22.3 mg, p<0.05). Before extubation, VAS scores were higher in the fast-track group, but after they were lower both at rest and during deep breathing. Extubation delay was shorter in the fast-track group (156.5+/-46.1 v 272+/-116.4 minutes, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of anesthesia with remifentanil and spinal analgesia with morphine and clonidine produces effective analgesia after coronary artery surgery and a rapid extubation time.     

The effect of hypernatremia on liver allografts in rats

We performed a prospective randomized double-blinded study to test preservative-free S(+)-ketamine alone or in combination with clonidine for intra- and postoperative caudal blockade in pediatric surgery over a 24-h period. Fifty-three children (1-72 mo) scheduled for inguinal hernia repair were caudally injected with either S(+)-ketamine 1 mg/kg alone (Group K) or with additional clonidine (Group C1 = 1 microg/kg; Group C2 = 2 microg/kg) during sevoflurane anesthesia via a laryngeal mask. Intraoperative monitoring included heart rate, blood pressure, and pulse oximetry; postoperative monitoring included a pain discomfort scale and a sedation score. No additional analgesic drugs were required during surgery. The mean duration of postoperative analgesia was 13.3 +/- 9.2 h in Group K, 22.7 +/- 3.5 h in Group C1, and 21.8 +/- 5.2 h in Group C2 (P < 0.0001, Group K versus other groups). Groups C1 and C2 received significantly fewer analgesics in the postoperative period than Group K (15% and 18% vs 63%; P < 0.01). The three groups had similar postoperative sedation scores. We conclude that the combination of S(+)-ketamine 1 mg/kg with clonidine 1 or 2 microg/kg for caudal blockade in children provides excellent analgesia without side effects over a 24-h period. IMPLICATIONS: Caudally administered preservative-free S(+)-ketamine combined with 1 or 2 microg/kg clonidine provides excellent perioperative analgesia in children and has minimal side effects.     

Sole Use of Dexmedetomidine Has Limited Utility for Conscious Sedation during Outpatient Colonoscopy

Background: This study evaluated the ability of dexmedetomidine to provide analgesia and sedation for outpatient colonoscopy, examining outcomes including cardiorespiratory variables, side effects, and discharge readiness.

Methods: Sixty-four patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment regimens. In group D, patients received 1 [mu]g/kg dexmedetomidine over 15 min followed by an infusion of 0.2 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1. Group P received meperidine (1 mg/kg) with midazolam (0.05 mg/kg), and group F received fentanyl (0.1-0.2 mg intravenous) on demand. The assessment included measurements of heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, quality of sedation/analgesia, and an evaluation of the recovery time.

Results: The study was terminated before the planned 90 patients had been recruited because of adverse events in group D. In all groups, negligible hemoglobin oxygen saturation and respiratory rate variations were observed. In group D, there was a significantly larger decrease in heart rate (to approximately 40 beats/min in 2 of 19 cases) and blood pressure (to less than 50% of the initial value in 4 of 19 patients). Supplemental fentanyl was required in 47% of patients receiving dexmedetomidine to achieve a satisfactory level of analgesia (vs. 42.8% of patients in group P and 79.2% of patients in group F). Vertigo (5 patients), nausea/vomiting (5 patients), and ventricular bigeminy (1 patient) were observed only in group D. Time to home readiness was longest in group D (85 +/- 74, 39 +/- 21, and 32 +/- 13 min in groups D, P and F, respectively; P = 0.007).     

Small-dose intrathecal clonidine and isobaric bupivacaine for orthopedic surgery: a dose-response study

We examined the dose-response relationship of intrathecal clonidine at small doses (相似文献   

Effect of addition of clonidine to local anaesthetic mixture for peribulbar block

Clonidine added to local anaesthetics prolongs the duration of anaesthesia and analgesia of peripheral, neuraxial and retrobulbar blocks. The present randomized blinded controlled study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the addition of clonidine to local anaesthetic mixture on the quality, onset time, duration of peribulbar block, perioperative analgesia and patients' comfort. The study comprised two groups of 12 patients each. Group A (control) patients received 7 ml of a mixture of 2% lignocaine and hyaluronidase with 1 ml normal saline, while group B (clonidine group) patients had clonidine 1 microg/kg added to the above mixture. Onset and duration of lid akinesia, globe anaesthesia and akinesia, time to first analgesic medication and total analgesic requirement were assessed. Patients were monitored for heart rate, blood pressure, sedation and respiratory depression. Addition of clonidine to local anaesthetic mixture resulted in a significant increase in duration of lid akinesia (85.4+/-25.6 vs 173.3+/-35.3 min, P<0.001), globe anaesthesia (63.2+/-6.9 vs 78.8+/-17.5 min, P=0.012) and globe akinesia (161.3+/-24.3 vs 201.2+/-45.7 min, P=0.016). The onset time and quality of block were similar in both the groups. No significant haemodynamic, respiratory or sedative effects were recorded. The perioperative pain scores and the analgesic requirements were significantly (P<0.01) lower in group B patients. We found that addition of clonidine 1 microg/kg to local anaesthetic mixture significantly increases the duration of anaesthesia and analgesia after peribulbar block.     

Effect of intravenous clonidine on the dose of thiopental required to induce anesthesia.

A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted to investigate the influence of intravenous clonidine on thiopental dose requirements when used for induction of anesthesia and associated hemodynamic effects. Sixty ASA physical status I or II patients were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups: normal saline solution (control, n = 20); clonidine (2.5 micrograms/kg, n = 20); or clonidine (5 micrograms/kg, n = 20). The test drug was administered 15 min before induction of anesthesia with intravenous thiopental. The dose of thiopental to produce loss of lash reflex was recorded as well as mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate at 3-min intervals up to induction of anesthesia and then at 1-min intervals for 5 min. Significant decreases in thiopental dose were observed in both groups receiving clonidine compared with the control group, but there was no significant difference between clonidine groups. With dosage calculated according to total body mass, the control group required 5.50 +/- 1.15 mg/kg (mean +/- SD) of thiopental, whereas those who received 2.5 micrograms/kg of clonidine required 4.15 +/- 1.46 mg/kg of thiopental (a reduction of 25%), and those who received 5.0 micrograms/kg of clonidine required 3.48 +/- 1.06 mg/kg of thiopental (a reduction of 37%). When thiopental dose was adjusted for lean body mass, similar reductions were obtained. Clonidine, in both doses, produced more sedation than control, and the 2.5-mg/kg dose produced less sedation than the larger dose. Mean arterial blood pressure was lower in the groups receiving clonidine. There were no significant differences in heart rate among the three groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Clonidine versus ketamine to prevent tourniquet pain during intravenous regional anesthesia with lidocaine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Both clonidine and ketamine have been found to prolong the action of local anesthetics through a peripheral mechanism. Our study compares the efficacy of a low dose of clonidine or ketamine separately added to intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) with lidocaine to prevent tourniquet pain. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized double-blinded study in 45 patients undergoing hand or forearm surgery, with anticipated duration exceeding 1 hour under IVRA. Proximal cuff inflation of a double tourniquet was followed by administration of 40 mL of lidocaine 0.5% and either saline, 1 microg/kg clonidine, or 0.1 mg/kg ketamine. When anesthesia was established, the inflation of the proximal and distal cuff was interchanged. Thereafter, tourniquet pain was rated on a visual analog scale (VAS) every 10 minutes. Intraoperatively, boluses of 25 microg fentanyl were provided for tourniquet pain treatment when required, and total fentanyl consumption was recorded. RESULTS: Patients receiving plain lidocaine persistently reported the highest pain scores among groups (P <.001) 20 minutes after distal cuff inflation. Differences between the groups with additional treatment were noted 50 minutes after distal cuff inflation and until the end of the observation, with significantly lower VAS ratings (P <.001 to P <.01) in ketamine-treated patients. Total fentanyl consumption was significantly decreased by ketamine (70.00 +/- 25.35 microg) or clonidine (136.67 +/- 39.94 microg) compared with the plain lidocaine group (215.33 +/- 52.33 microg) (P <.001 between all groups). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of clonidine 1 microg/kg or ketamine 0.1 mg/kg to lidocaine for IVRA delays the onset of unbearable tourniquet pain and decreases analgesic consumption for tourniquet pain relief, although ketamine has a more potent effect.     

Intrathecal Anesthesia and Recovery from Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Background: Previous studies suggest that intraoperative anesthetic care may influence postoperative pain and recovery from surgery. The authors tested the hypothesis that the addition of intrathecal analgesia to general anesthesia would improve long-term functional status and decrease pain in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Methods: One hundred patients received either general anesthesia supplemented with intravenous fentanyl or general anesthesia preceded by intrathecal administration of bupivacaine (15 mg), clonidine (75 [mu]g), and morphine (0.2 mg). Patients and providers were masked to treatment assignment. All patients received multimodal pain management postoperatively. Primary outcomes included pain and functional status over the first 12 postoperative weeks.

Results: Patients receiving intrathecal analgesia required more intravenous fluids and vasopressors intraoperatively. Pain was well controlled throughout the study (mean numerical pain scores < 3 in both groups at all times studied). Intrathecal analgesia decreased pain and supplemental intravenous morphine use over the first postoperative day but increased the frequency of pruritus. Pain and functional status after discharge from the hospital did not differ between groups. Intrathecal analgesia significantly decreased the duration of hospital stay (from 2.8 +/- 2.0 to 2.1 +/- 0.5 days; P < 0.01) as a result of five patients in the control group who stayed in the hospital more than 3 days.     

Sympathetic Neural Activation Evoked by μ-Receptor Blockade in Patients Addicted to Opioids Is Abolished by Intravenous Clonidine

Background: [mu]-Opioid receptor blockade by naloxone administered for acute detoxification in patients addicted to opioids markedly increases catecholamine plasma concentrations, muscle sympathetic activity (MSA), and is associated with cardiovascular stimulation despite general anesthesia. The current authors tested the hypothesis that the [alpha]2-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine (1) attenuates increased MSA during [mu]-opioid receptor blockade for detoxification, and (2) prevents cardiovascular activation when given before detoxification.

Methods: Fourteen mono-opioid addicted patients received naloxone during propofol anesthesia. Clonidine (10 [mu]g kg-1 administered over 5 min + 5 [mu]g kg-1 h-1 intravenous) was infused either before (n = 6) or after (n = 6) naloxone administration. Two patients without immediate clonidine administration occurring after naloxone administration served as time controls. Muscle sympathetic activity (n = 8) in the peroneal nerve, catecholamine plasma concentrations (n = 14), arterial blood pressure, and heart rate were assessed in awake patients, during propofol anesthesia before and after [mu]-opioid receptor blockade, and after clonidine administration.

Results: [mu]-Receptor blockade markedly increased MSA from a low activity (burst frequency: from 2 burst/min +/- 1 to 24 +/- 8, means +/- SD). Similarly, norepinephrine (41 pg/ml +/- 37 to 321 +/- 134) and epinephrine plasma concentration (13 pg/ml +/- 6 to 627 +/- 146) significantly increased, and were associated with, increased arterial blood pressure and heart rate. Clonidine immediately abolished both increased MSA (P < 0.001) and catecholamine plasma concentrations (P < 0.001). When clonidine was given before [mu]-opioid receptor blockade, catecholamine plasma concentrations and hemodynamic variables did not change.     

Intravenous clonidine prolongs bupivacaine spinal anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Prolongation of spinal anesthesia by oral clonidine premedication has been known. We hypothesized that intravenous clonidine administered after the spinal block may prolong spinal anesthesia. METHODS: To assess the prolongation of spinal anesthesia by intravenous clonidine, we designed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective study. Patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery received 12 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and were randomly divided into three groups (n = 26 in each group). In the clonidine 10-min group, 3 microg x kg-1 of clonidine was administered for 10 min immediately after the spinal block. In the clonidine 60-min group, 3 microg x kg-1 of clonidine was administered for 10 min, 50 min after the spinal block. The control group received normal saline. Sensory block was evaluated by pinprick and the duration was defined as the time for sensory block to regress to L1 dermatome. Duration of motor block was defined as the time required for the patient to flex his or her knee. RESULTS: The duration of sensory block was longer in both the clonidine 10-min and clonidine 60-min groups compared with the control group (196 +/- 42 min, 179 +/- 41 min vs. 125 +/- 25 min, P < 0.05). The duration of motor block was longer in the clonidine 10-min group than in the control group (153 +/- 26 min vs. 131 +/- 29 min, P < 0.05). The lowest heart rate and mean blood pressure were not different among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous clonidine administration within 1 h after the spinal block prolonged bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for approximately 1 h without adverse effects.