Second mobilization and collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells in healthy donors is associated with lower CD34(+) cell yields

We have retrospectively evaluated the results of two cycles of mobilization and collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) from 46 healthy donors included in the Spanish National Donor Registry. Mobilization involved the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at a median dose of 10 microg/kg per day, and apheresis was begun after the fourth dose of G-CSF in both cycles. The median interval between both mobilizations was 187 days (range, 7-1428 days). The incidence and types of side-effects were similar after both donations, with 25 and 26 donors developing some toxicity after the first and second donations, respectively. The median number of CD34(+) cells collected was higher after the first mobilization than after the second (5.15 versus 3.16 x 10(6)/kg, respectively; p = 0.05), and 29 donors yielded fewer CD34(+) cells after the second mobilization (p = 0.018). A lower proportion of donors yielded CD34(+) cell counts >4 x 10(6)/kg after the second cycle than after the first (52% versus 76%, respectively; p = 0.057). Our study shows that second rounds of PBPC collection from normal donors are well tolerated but are associated with a significantly reduced number of CD34(+) cells collected when the same mobilization scheme is used.     

Mobilization kinetics of CD34+/Thy-1dim progenitor cells during recombinant human granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor administration in normal donors

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic transplantation of granulocyte-colony- stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) from normal related donors is effective in achieving engraftment with a relatively short period of posttransplantation aplasia. The optimal dose and composition of PBPC transplants are unknown. The CD34+/Thy-1dim progenitor cell subset is enriched for putative stem cells. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The kinetics of the primitive subpopulation were prospectively studied in nine normal donors receiving recombinant human G-CSF (6 microg/kg) subcutaneously twice daily for 6 days for collection of PBPCs for allogeneic transplantation. RESULTS: The concentration (mean +/− SD) of the circulating CD34+/Thy-1dim subset increased from a baseline of 0.9 +/− 0.9 × 10(3) to 29.2 +/− 22.1 × 10(3) per mL on Day 4 and 38.0 +/− 29.8 × 10(3) per mL on Day 6. The level of CD34+/Thy-1dim cells was closely correlated with the overall level of CD34+ cells. At baseline, CD34+/Thy-1dim cells composed 21.1 percent of the total CD34+ cells, increasing to 36.3 percent at the peak of mobilization. CONCLUSION: CD34+/Thy-1dim cells are optimally mobilized on Days 4 to 6 of recombinant human G-CSF treatment.     

A combination of low-dose cyclophosphamide and colony-stimulating factors is more cost-effective than granulocyte-colony-stimulating factors alone in mobilizing peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells

BACKGROUND: The use of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) instead of autologous bone marrow leads to more rapid engraftment following high-dose chemotherapy. Mobilization regimens differ with respect to toxicity, efficiency, and cost. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two cohorts of patients with breast cancer received one of two mobilization regimens: granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at 10 micrograms per kg was given subcutaneously for 5 days, with leukapheresis begun on Day 6, or low-dose cyclophosphamide followed by sequential granulocyte-macrophage-CSF (GM-CSF) at 5 micrograms per kg for 5 days and by G-CSF at 10 micrograms per kg, with leukapheresis begun on Day 11. Results of CD34+ cell collection, engraftment, and costs of mobilization were determined. RESULTS: The combination chemotherapy and growth factor regimen was more efficient in mobilizing CD34+ cells. Sixty-six percent of patients reached a target 4 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg in a single leukapheresis session with the combination regimen, compared to 14 percent who received G-CSF alone (p < 0.01). The mean number of leukapheresis sessions required to reach a target of 4 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg was 1.3 for the combination regimen and 2.7 for the regimen of G-CSF alone (p < 0.01). One patient in the chemotherapy and growth factor group developed febrile neutropenia. Engraftment was similar in both cohorts of patients. The cost of mobilization, including all supplies and cryopreservation, was $7381 for the G-CSF regimen and $5508 for the chemotherapy regimen (p < 0.05). This reduction was attributed to the lower number of leukapheresis and cryopreservation sessions, which outweighed the slight increase in expense for chemotherapy and growth factor in the combination regimen. CONCLUSION: This combination mobilization regimen allowed the predictable and efficient collection of CD34+ cells from the peripheral blood in a limited number of leukapheresis sessions, which reduced the cost of mobilization by approximately 25 percent.     

Kinetics of PBPC mobilization by cyclophosphamide, as compared with that by epirubicin/paclitaxel followed by G-CSF support: implications for optimal timing of PBPC harvest

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on the mobilization kinetics of autologous PBPCs after induction with various chemotherapy regimens. With PBPC mobilization in patients with breast cancer used as a model for chemotherapy-induced PBPC recruitment, the kinetics of progenitor cells mobilized either with cyclophosphamide (CY) or epirubicin/paclitaxel (EPI-TAX) followed by the administration of G-CSF was compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study included a total of 86 patients with breast cancer (stage II-IV) receiving either CY (n = 39) or EPI-TAX (n = 47), both followed by G-CSF support. The progenitor cell content in peripheral blood and apheresis components was monitored by flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ cells. PBPC collection was started when the threshold of >20 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per L of peripheral blood was reached. RESULTS: The PBPC collection was begun a median of 9 days after the administration of EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF support, as compared to a median of 13 days after mobilization with CY plus G-CSF. After treatment with CY, the total numbers of PBPCs peaked on Day 1 of apheresis, and they rapidly declined thereafter. In contrast, treatment with EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF administration led to a steady mobilization of CD34+ cells during leukapheresis. The difference in the mobilization patterns with CY and EPI-TAX resulted in a greater yield of CD34+ cells per L of processed blood volume. Compared to EPI-TAX, mobilization with CY required the overall processing of 30 percent less whole-blood volume to reach the target yield of > or = 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight. After a median of three apheresis procedures, however, both CY+G-CSF and EPI-TAX+G-CSF were equally effective in obtaining this target yield. CONCLUSION: These results imply that specific PBPC mobilization as part of a given chemotherapy regimen should be taken into consideration before the planning of a PBPC harvest.     

Comparison of two leukapheresis programs for computerized collection of blood progenitor cells on a new cell separator

BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) can be collected on various cell separators. Two leukapheresis programs (LP-MNC and LP-PBSC-Lym) were evaluated for computerized collection of PBPCs on a new cell separator. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Leukapheresis assisted by the LP-MNC or LP-PBSC-Lym software was performed for the harvesting of PBPCs in 52 oncology patients after chemotherapy plus G-CSF treatment and in 18 healthy subjects after G-CSF mobilization alone. RESULTS: A total of 38 components from 33 donors via LP-MNC and 43 components from 37 donors via LP-PBSC-Lym were collected with a median of one (range, one to two) standard-volume leukapheresis procedures (9.2-13.3 L) per donor. There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning median counts of WBCs, CD34+ cells, CD34+ cell yields per harvest, and CD34+ cell yields of cumulative harvests. The blood cell counts after leukapheresis revealed that the LP-MNC resulted in significantly higher platelet loss than LP-PBSC-Lym (p = 0.024): 35.9 percent (range, 19.2%-66.1%) versus 29.7 percent (11.6%-52.3%). Regarding the CD34+ cell collection efficiency, the LP-MNC program was significantly better than the LP-PBSC-Lym program (p < 0.001): 77.5 percent (range, 35.5%-98.9%) versus 58.3 percent (range, 20.4%-98.9%). However, concentrates collected by the LP-PBSC-Lym program had significantly higher percentages of MNCs (p < 0.001) and CD34+ cells (p = 0.028) than harvests with the LP-MNC program: 90 percent (range, 69%-99%) versus 70 percent (range, 35%-98%) and 1.2 percent (range, 0.2%-7.3%) versus 0.7 percent (range, 0.2%-6.0%), respectively. No leukapheresis-related serious adverse events were seen, and time for hematopoietic engraftment was equivalent to data published in the literature. CONCLUSION: The LP-MNC program shows a significantly better CD34+ cell collection efficiency than the LP-PBSC-Lym program. However, collections with the LP-MNC program result in PBPC components with a lower MNC and CD34+ cell concentrations and a higher apheresis-related loss of patient's platelets.     

Peripheral blood progenitor cell collection after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy using EPO-based cytokine regimens: a randomized comparison of G-CSF and sequential GM-/G-CSF

BACKGROUND: The peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization capacity of EPO in association with either G-CSF or sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF was compared in a randomized fashion after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ETP) chemotherapy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty patients with stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV ovarian carcinoma were enrolled in this randomized comparison of mobilizing capacity and myelopoietic effects of G-CSF + EPO and GM-/G-CSF + EPO following the first ETP chemotherapy treatment. After ETP chemotherapy (Day 1), 20 patients received G-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 2 to Day 13 and 20 patients received GM-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 2 to Day 6 followed by G-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 7 to Day 13. EPO (150 IU per kg) was given every other day from Day 2 to Day 13 to all patients in both arms of the study. Apheresis (two blood volumes) was performed during hematologic recovery. RESULTS: The magnitude of CD34+ cell mobilization and the abrogation of patients' myelosuppression were comparable in both study arms; however, GM-/G-CSF + EPO patients had significantly higher CD34+ yields because of a higher CD34+ cell collection efficiency (57.5% for GM-/G-CSF + EPO and 46.3% for G-CSF + EPO patients; p = 0.0009). Identical doses of PBPCs mobilized by GM-/G-CSF + EPO and G-CSF + EPO drove comparable hematopoietic recovery after reinfusion in patients treated with identical high-dose chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The sequential administration of GM-CSF and G-CSF in combination with EPO is feasible and improves the PBPC collection efficiency after platinum-based intensive polychemotherapy, associating high PBPC mobilization to high collection efficiency during apheresis.     

African American adult apheresis donors respond to granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor with neutrophil and progenitor cell yields comparable to those of Caucasian and Hispanic donors

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte–colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF)‐mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are the most common source of cells used for hematopoietic transplantation. Benign ethnic neutropenia has been found in persons of African descent, affecting circulating white blood cells (WBCs), but not WBC production within marrow. Persons of African descent have reduced neutrophil mobilization after steroid administration, and newborns have fewer nucleated and progenitor cells in their cord blood. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty‐two African American (AA) and 12 Hispanic PBPC donors were age, sex, and weight matched with 34 Caucasian donors. Groups were compared based on WBC and neutrophil counts after mobilization and numbers of CD34+ cells collected on Day 5 of G‐CSF mobilization. RESULTS: AA donors had significantly lower baseline WBC (6.1 ± 1.1 vs. 7.1 ± 1.7, p = 0.04) and neutrophil (3.4 ± 1.1 vs. 4.5 ± 1.3, p = 0.01) counts compared to matched Caucasian donors. G‐CSF–stimulated AAs had a significantly greater increase in WBC and neutrophil counts compared to matched Caucasians (889 ± 293% vs. 665 ± 230% neutrophils, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in product cell counts when comparing total nucleated, CD3+, CD34+, and mononuclear cells or colony‐forming units (CFUs) between Caucasians and Hispanics or AAs and trends to greater numbers of neutrophils in products from AA donors. CONCLUSION: When stimulated by G‐CSF, AAs are able to increase WBC and neutrophil counts to a higher degree than Caucasians, achieving similar numbers of neutrophil and progenitor cells in apheresis products despite starting from lower baseline blood counts.     

Treatment of normal individuals with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor: donor experiences and the effects on peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts and on the collection of peripheral blood stem cells

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been used in patients to increase the level of circulating hematopoietic progenitors. Although G-CSF has been administered to some healthy individuals, the kinetics of mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs), the optimum dose schedule and the incidence and nature of adverse reactions in normal individuals are not completely defined. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Normal individuals (n = 102) who received G- CSF for 5 or 10 days at doses of 2, 5, 7.5, or 10 micrograms per kg per day were studied. The subjects were observed for symptoms and physical changes, and blood samples were obtained for a variety of laboratory tests. After 5 or 10 days of G-CSF treatment, PBSCs were collected by apheresis and analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 89 percent of the individuals completed the 5-day treatment protocol and 88 percent completed the 10- day protocol without modification of the dose of G-CSF administered. Ninety percent of donors experienced some side effect of G-CSF. The most frequent effects noted were bone pain (83%), headache (39%), body aches (23%), fatigue (14%), and nausea and/or vomiting (12%). The dose of G-CSF administered directly affected the proportion of people with bone pain (p = 0.025) or body aches (p = 0.045) or who were feeling hot or having night sweats (p = 0.02) or taking analgesics (p = 0.01). With the 5-day dose schedule, several changes in serum chemistries occurred, including increases in alkaline phosphatase (p = 0.001), alanine aminotransferase (p = 0.0013), lactate dehydrogenase (p = 0.0001), and sodium (p = 0.0001). Decreases occurred in glucose (p = 0.045), potassium (p = 0.0004), bilirubin (p = 0.001), and blood urea nitrogen (p = 0.0017). In donors who received G-CSF for 5 days, the absolute neutrophil count was increased after one G-CSF dose, and it reached a maximum on Day 6, as did the number of CD34+ cells (64.6 +/? 55.9 × 10(6) cells/L). In those same donors, the platelet count after apheresis on Day 6 was 32 +/? 13 percent lower than pretreatment values (250 +/? 42 × 10(9) cells/L). In donors receiving G-CSF for 10 days, the neutrophil count reached a maximum on Day 8, but the number of CD34+ cells peaked on Day 6 (58.3 +/? 52.1 × 10(5) cells/L) and then declined. The platelet count decreased from pretreatment values by 28 +/? 12 percent prior to apheresis on Day 11. When individuals were treated for 5 days with G-CSF, the quantity of CD34+ cells collected was directly related to the G-CSF dose. When 5 micrograms per kg per day was given, 2.80 +/? 1.81 × 10(8) cells were collected, compared with collection of 4.67 +/? 3.11 × 10(8) cells when 10 micrograms per kg per day was given (p = 0.04). More important, PBSCs collected after 10 days of G-CSF administration (5 micrograms/kg/day) had significantly fewer CD34+ cells (0.82 +/? 0.37 × 10(8) cells, p = 0.01) than did PBSCs collected after 5 days of G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/day). CONCLUSION: Most normal donors receiving G-CSF experience side effects, but these are mild to moderate in degree. Some alterations in blood chemistries occur, but none were clinically serious. Because of the symptoms associated with G-CSF, these individuals must be monitored closely. The treatment of normal donors with G-CSF for more than 5 days significantly decreased the number of circulating CD34+ cells and the quantity collected by apheresis.     

Spleen enlargement in healthy donors during G-CSF mobilization of PBPCs

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human G-CSF is widely used to mobilize PBPCs in healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation. There have been concerns about donor safety because of splenic ruptures during G-CSF application. To address this problem, changes in splenic size in 91 healthy donors during G-CSF mobilization of allogeneic PBPCs were investigated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: For mobilization, G-CSF in a dosage of 7.5 microg per kg per day was administered for 5 days and PBPC collection started Day 5. Splenic size was determined by ultrasound before G-CSF application was started and on the day of the first apheresis. RESULTS: The mean increase in splenic length was 11 mm (range, 0-28 mm; p<0.0001), whereas a mean increase of 5 mm in width (range, 0-14 mm; p<0.0001) was measured. No major side effects could be observed. There was no significant correlation between the increase in splenic size and the hematologic values, or the age and body-mass index. In a multivariant analysis, no independent risk factor for the development of a spleen enlargement over 19 mm in length and 9 mm in thickness was found in 20 percent of investigated donors. CONCLUSION: In this prospective trial, a significant spleen enlargement was observed in healthy donors during G-CSF mobilization of allogeneic PBPCs. Further investigations are needed to define the degree of spleen enlargement with higher G-CSF dosages to improve donor safety.     

自体外周血干细胞动员中测定CD34^＋Thy—1＋细胞的意义

目的：确切评估动员后外周血干细胞（ＰＢＳＣ）水平的变化，及时指导临床选择最佳采血时机。方法：用流式细胞术测定化疗和粒细胞集落刺激因子（Ｇ－ＣＳＦ）联合动员时外周血ＣＤ３４＋Ｔｈｙ－１＋细胞含量的变化，同时用体外集落培养方法评价外周血祖细胞（ＰＢＰＣｓ）的克隆形成能力。结果：动员后循环血中ＣＤ３４＋Ｔｈｙ－１＋细胞、ＣＤ３４＋细胞和克隆形成细胞（ＣＦＣ）含量分别增高４８．６倍、５０．０倍和５３．１倍，高峰时间在化疗后第１２～１４天（注射Ｇ－ＣＳＦ的第６～８天）；外周血单个核细胞中ＣＤ３４＋Ｔｈｙ－１＋细胞、ＣＤ３４＋细胞的比例分别增高１３．８倍和１０．５倍；动员的早期阶段，ＣＤ３４＋细胞中Ｔｈｙ－１＋细胞比例最高。结论：联合应用化疗和Ｇ－ＣＳＦ对ＰＢＰＣｓ，尤其对早期干／祖细胞具有显著动员作用；用流式细胞术检测ＣＤ３４＋Ｔｈｙ－１＋细胞可及时指导临床准时采集ＰＢＳＣ。     

A single dose of 6 or 12 mg of pegfilgrastim for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization results in similar yields of CD34+ progenitors in patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND: Current regimens for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma are based on daily subcutaneous injections of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) starting shortly after cytotoxic therapy. Recently a polyethylene glycol-conjugated G-CSF (pegfilgrastim) was introduced that has a substantially longer t(1/2) than the original formula. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The use of pegfilgrastim was examined at two dose levels for PBPC mobilization in patients with Stage II or III multiple myeloma. Four days after cytotoxic therapy with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m(2)), a single dose of either 6 mg pegfilgrastim (n = 15) or 12 mg pegfilgrastim (n = 15) or daily doses of 8 microg per kg unconjugated G-CSF (n = 15) were administered. The number of circulating CD34+ cells was determined during white blood cell (WBC) recovery, and PBPC harvesting was performed by large-volume apheresis. RESULTS: Pegfilgrastim was equally potent at 6 and 12 mg with regard to mobilization and yield of CD34+ cells. No dose dependence was observed because CD34+ cell concentration peaks were 131 and 85 per microL, respectively, and CD34+ cell yield was 10.2 x 10(6) and 7.4 x 10(6) per kg of body weight, respectively. Pegfilgrastim in either dose was associated with a more rapid WBC recovery (p = 0.03) and an earlier performance of the first apheresis procedure (p < 0.05) in comparison to unconjugated G-CSF. No difference regarding CD34+ cell maximum and yield could be observed. CONCLUSION: A single dose of 6 mg pegfilgrastim is equally potent as 12 mg for mobilization and harvest of PBPCs in patients with multiple myeloma. Because no dose dependency was seen at these dose levels, this might be also true for even smaller doses.     

Factors affecting mobilization of CD34+ cells in normal donors treated with filgrastim

BACKGROUND: Multiple days of apheresis are required for some normal peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) donors, to ensure a sufficient collection of CD34+ cells for allografting. It would be of practical value to be able to identify the patients with poor mobilization on the basis of simple pretreatment clinical or hematologic variables. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Clinical characteristics and laboratory data for 119 normal PBPC donors who underwent apheresis on Days 4 to 6 of treatment with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) were analyzed for correlations with CD34+ cell yield from the first day of apheresis. RESULTS: The CD34+ cell yield was significantly lower in donors who were more than 55 years of age, who underwent apheresis on Day 4 of filgrastim therapy, or who were not obese. There were weak direct correlations between CD34+ cell yield and the baseline white cell count, preapheresis white cell count, and preapheresis mononuclear cell count, and there was a weak inverse correlation with age. Twenty- one donors (18%) were considered to have poor mobilization (< 20 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/L blood processed). In the multivariate analysis, the only significant factor was age greater than 55 years, which conferred a 3.8 times greater risk (95% CI, 1.1-13.7) of poor mobilization (p = 0.04). However, poor mobilization occurred in all age groups, so the predictive value of the model was low. CONCLUSION: Donor variables correlated with CD34+ cell yield only weakly, so no particular clinical characteristic can be used to exclude an individual as a PBPC donor if he or she is otherwise suitable for the apheresis procedure.     

重组人G-CSF对健康供者外周造血干／祖细胞动员和采集效果的影响因素分析

应用重组人粒系集落刺激因子（rhG—CSF）对健康供者进行动员并采集造血干细胞用于异基因外周血造血干细胞移植已在临床广泛应用，本研究通过对影响外周干细胞动员和采集效果的多因素分析，进一步探讨最佳动员方案及采集时机。采取回顾性方法分析了431例健康供者外周血干细胞动员采集效果，并进一步分析了供者一般特征、rhG—CSF动员天数、每日皮下注射次数、剂量与采集效果的关系。结果表明：rhG—CSF在动员中平均应用剂量为5．7μg／（kg·d），平均采集1．7次，收获单个核细胞数平均为9．57×10^8／kg，CD34^＋细胞平均为4．91×10^6／kg。绝大多数供者不良反应轻微。多因素分析结果显示，采集效率主要与供者体重指数，采集天数相关。rhG—CSF动员第5天采集的供者，其MNC数、CD34^＋细胞数及第一次单采成功率均优于其他时间采集的供者。同时，本组供者应用rhG—CSF剂量较小且剂量范围较窄，rhG—CSF剂量不如采集时间对采集物质量的影响明显。结论：小剂量应用rhG—CSF动员并于第5天开始采集是健康供者造血干细胞动员的较理想方案。     

Peripheral Blood Allogeneic Stem Cell Mobilization: Can We Predict a Suboptimal Mobilization?

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells mobilization is now the basis of most stem cell transplants. In a very limited number of cases, mobilization is suboptimal leading to further collection procedures, to suboptimal cell doses infusion with delayed engraftment time, increased risks of transplant procedure and of related costs. To date we have no recognized and shared criteria for early estimating the probability of poor mobilization in healthy donors. We then analyzed allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell donations performed at the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS Hospital from January 2013 to December 2021 in order to identify premobilization factors associated with successful mobilization. The following data were collected: age, gender, weight, complete blood cell count at baseline, G-CSF dose, number of collection procedures, CD34+ cell count in peripheral blood on the first day of collection, CD34+ cell dose per kg body weight of recipient. Mobilization efficacy was defined according to the number of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood on day +5 of G-CSF administration. We classified donors as sub-optimal mobilizers or good mobilizers according to the achievement of the 50 CD34+ cell/μL threshold. We observed 30 suboptimal mobilizations in 158 allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell donations. Age and baseline white blood cell count were factors significantly associated with negative or positive impact on mobilization, respectively. We did not find significant differences in mobilization based on gender or G-CSF dose. Using cut-off values of 43 years and 5.5×10⁹/L WBC count, we built a suboptimal mobilization score: donors who reach 2, 1 or 0 points have a 46%, 16% or 4% probability of suboptimal mobilization, respectively. Our model explains 26% of the variability of mobilization confirming that most of the mobilization magnitude depends on genetically determined factors; however, suboptimal mobilization score is a simple tool providing an early assessment of mobilization efficacy before G-CSF administration begins in order to support allogeneic stem cells selection, mobilization and collection. Through a systematic review, we looked for confirmation of our findings. According to the published articles, all the variables we included in our model are confirmed to be strongly related to the success of mobilization. We believe that score system approach could be applied in clinical practice to assess the risk of mobilization failure at baseline allowing for a priori intervention.     

Automated programs for collection of mononuclear cells and progenitor cells by two separators for peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: comparison by a randomized crossover study

BACKGROUND: Although automated programs have been increasingly used to collect peripheral blood (PB) progenitor cells (PBPCs), differences among them remain unclear. The automated programs of Amicus (Baxter Healthcare) and Spectra (software Version 6.1, Gambro BCT) apheresis machines were compared in a crossover study. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The patients for autologous and donors for allogeneic PBPC transplantation mobilized with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor were randomly assigned into two groups. PBPCs were collected by the Amicus on the first day and the Spectra on the second of 2 consecutive days in Group I, and the reverse order was used in Group II. Of 39 patients or donors enrolled, 17 reached their collection goal with only one procedure and did not participate in the paired study. Thus, 44 paired procedures of the remaining 22 subjects were evaluated. RESULTS: The product yields of white blood cells (WBCs; p < 0.005), mononuclear cells (MNCs; p < 0.02), and CD34+ PBPCs (p < 0.0002) from patients or donors were higher in the Amicus collections than those in the Spectra collections. The collection efficiencies of WBCs (p < 0.03), MNCs (p < 0.02), and CD34+ PBPCs (p < 0.03) were higher in the Amicus collections. The numbers of contaminating platelets (PLTs) in the Amicus collections were lower than those in the Spectra collections (p < 0.05) with a greater decrease in PB PLT counts after apheresis with the Spectra (p < 0.01). The Amicus had a longer running time than the Spectra for processing similar volumes (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: The automated program of the Amicus may be better than that of the Spectra for collecting MNCs and CD34+ PBPCs and avoiding apheresis-induced thrombocytopenia.     

Circulatory arrest during PBPC apheresis in an unrelated donor

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, the collection of PBPCs by apheresis from healthy donors is a routine method. The mobilization with rHu G-CSF and the apheresis procedures are usually well tolerated without severe side effects. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We report a severe complication in a 41-year-old unrelated female donor who was allowed to donate PBPCs and was mobilized with 10 microg of G-CSF per kg per day. During PBPC apheresis, she experienced a circulatory arrest after 132 minutes and processing of 7078 mL of blood (twice the donor's blood volume). RESULTS: Immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation restored sinus rhythm and regulatory respiration without sequelae. Subsequent cardiologic examinations (heart catheterization, electrophysiologic testing, tilting table test) resulted in the diagnosis of a neurocardiogenic syncope. Other cardiac or circulatory disorders could be excluded. The implantation of a cardiac pacemaker was recommended to the donor. The 4-year-old recipient was successfully transplanted with the partial product collected until the arrest occurred. The patient received a total of 2.54 x 106 CD34+ cells per kg of body weight. CONCLUSION: After exclusion of other cardiac diseases, the diagnosed neurocardiogenic syncope probably induced the circulatory arrest during apheresis rather than the administration of G-CSF.     

The collection and evaluation of peripheral blood progenitor cells sufficient for repetitive cycles of high-dose chemotherapy support

BACKGROUND: The development of an optimized peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) harvest protocol to provide support for repetitive chemotherapy cycles is described. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBPCs mobilized by cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were studied in 163 leukapheresis harvests from 26 lymphoma patients. Harvested cells were transfused with two chemotherapy cycles and with an autologous bone marrow transplant. Progenitor cell content was examined in the context of hematopoietic engraftment. RESULTS: Mobilization allowed the harvest of large numbers of PBPCs. Peak harvests tended to occur after the recovering white cell count exceeded 10 × 10(9) per L. CD34+ lymphomononuclear cell (MNC) and colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) counts correlated poorly, but both measures peaked within 24 hours of each other in 21 of 26 patients, which demonstrated PBPC mobilization. Engraftment of platelets (> 50×10(9)/L) and granulocytes (> 500×10(6)/L) was achieved in a median of 20.5 and 16 days, respectively. A minimum number of progenitors necessary to ensure engraftment could be derived. CONCLUSION: Cyclophosphamide and G-CSF allowed the harvest of sufficient PBPCs to support multiple rounds of chemotherapy. Harvest should commence when the recovery white cell count exceeds 10×10(9) per L. PBPC harvest CD34+MNC counts are as useful as CFU-GM results in the assessment of PBPC content, and they may allow harvest protocols to be tailored to individual patients.     

Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells from allogeneic healthy donors using a new biosimilar G‐CSF (Zarzio®)

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) have become the major source of hematopoietic progenitor cells for allogeneic transplantation. In February 2008, Zarzio® was approved by the European Medicine Agency for PBPCs mobilization, but this authorization was not based in trials analyzing safety and efficacy for PBPCs mobilization. Since August 2011, Zarzio® has been used at our institution for PBPCs mobilization. In total 36 healthy family donors underwent PBPCs mobilization, 18 with Neupogen® and 18 with Zarzio®. Donor characteristics were equivalent between groups, and no severe adverse effects were registered in the Zarzio® group. The number of CD34 cells collected/Kg recipient body weight was 6.7 × 10⁶ (3.8–11.1) in the Zarzio® group versus 8.4 × 10⁶ (5.6–16.6) in the Neupogen® group (P = 0.04). We collected the minimal target cell dose (2 × 10⁶/kg) in all donors from each group and no significant differences were found in the collection of the optimal cell dose (5 × 10⁶/kg) between groups, although 3/18 (16.6%) donors that received Zarzio® failed to mobilize the optimal cell dose compared with 0% in the Neupogen® group. A total of 35 patients proceeded to transplantation (17 in the Zarzio® and 18 in the Neupogen® groups, respectively). Platelet and neutrophil median time to engraftment was comparable between the two groups. Our retrospective study supports the conclusion that Zarzio® mobilization of PBPCs in healthy donors is safe but perhaps not as effective as the reference Neupogen. However, more prospective trials are required to definitively asses the safety and efficacy of G‐CSF biosimilars for PBPCs mobilization in healthy donors. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:48–52, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Efficacy of single-dose pegfilgrastim after chemotherapy for the mobilization of autologous peripheral blood stem cells in patients with malignant lymphoma or multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND: A single injection of pegfilgrastim has been shown to be equivalent to daily filgrastim in enhancing neutrophil recovery after chemotherapy, whereas the experiences with pegfilgrastim in mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty unselected patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma were treated with different chemotherapy regimens followed by 6 mg of pegfilgrastim for mobilization of autologous PBPCs. Patients with an inadequate mobilization (blood CD34+ cells 相似文献   

Technical and safety aspects of blood and marrow transplantation using G-CSF mobilized family donors

An allogeneic transplantation programme using immunoselected blood progenitor and bone marrow CD34+ cells has been established. Thirteen healthy HLA-matched, MLC negative sibling donors received two doses of 5 micrograms kg-1 G-CSF (s.c. daily) for 5 days. On days 4 and 5, large-volume mononuclear cell aphereses were performed (COBE Spectra) and on day 5 one unit of autologous blood was obtained. Mononuclear cells were pooled and cryopreserved after CD34+ cell-immunoselection on day 5. Bone marrow (BM) of the same donors was procured under routine conditions 10-45 days later (median: 27 days). The final graft consisted of blood CD34+ cells with either complete BM (n = 5) or immunoselected BM CD34+ cells (n = 8). The present paper describes the progenitor cell mobilization and apheresis protocol and analyzes the cell loss by BM and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) donation. Considerably larger amounts of mononuclear cells (CD45+), T-lymphocytes (CD3+) and platelets were lost by the apheresis as compared to bone marrow without apparent immediate clinical consequences for the donors. Owing to cross-cellular contamination of the apheresis concentrate, blood platelet count (PC) significantly decreased (mean PC after the second apheresis 116 x 10 microL-1); furthermore on average 3.04 x 10(10) CD3+ cells were removed by two apheresis sessions. This loss did not lead to long-term total lymphocyte count changes (2370 microL-1 versus 1889 microL-1) as observed during the long-term follow-up of 7/13 donors (mean 290 days). Subjectively, the PBPC collections were better accepted than BM donations in all but one family donor.