呼气末二氧化碳分压反映患儿置入喉罩机械通气时动脉血二氧化碳分压的准确性

目的 评价PETCO2反映患儿置入喉罩机械通气时PaCO2的准确性.方法 拟在全身麻醉下行骨科手术患儿52例,ASA分级Ⅰ级,年龄2～9岁,体重10～30 kg.采用分层随机法,将患儿随机分为2组(n=26):喉罩组(LMA组)和气管导管组(ETT组).常规麻醉诱导后行机械通气,待血液动力学稳定后,采集桡动脉血样测定PaCO2,同时记录PETCO2.结果 两组间PETCO2和PaCO2比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);LMA组PETCO2与PaCO2比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 患儿置入喉罩机械通气时,PETCO2可反映PaCO2,用于指导调整机械通气参数.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the accuracy of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) in reflecting arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) during mechanical ventilation via laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in children. Methods Fifty-two ASA Ⅰ patients, aged 2-9 yr, weighing 10-30 kg, undergoing orthopaedic surgery under general anesthesia, were randomized into 2 groups (n = 26 each) : LMA group and endotracheal tube (ETT) group. After anesthesia was induced with fentanyl, propofol and succinycholine, LMA or ETT was inserted and the children were mechanically ventilated. After the hemodynamics was stable, arterial blood samples were obtained to detect PaCO2, and PETCO2 was recorded simultaneously. Results There was no significant difference in PaCO2 and PCT CO, between groups LMA and ETT ( P ＞ 0.05) . There was no significant difference between PaCO2 and PETCO2 in LMA group (P ＞ 0.05). Conclusion When mechanical ventilation is performed via LMA in children, PETCO2 can reliably reflect PaCO2 and guide the regulation of ventilatory parameters.     

The pressor response after laryngeal mask or cuffed oropharyngeal airway insertion

BACKGROUND: Since the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) has been suggested to cause less pharyngeal trauma than the laryngeal mask airway (LMA), we conducted a prospective, randomised study to compare haemodynamic changes after placing either the COPA or LMA in healthy anaesthetised adults. METHODS: After standard midazolam premedication (0.05 mg kg(-1) IV), general anaesthesia (IV propofol 2 mg kg(-1)) was induced in 60 ASA physical status I-II, 18-65-yr-old patients, who were randomly allocated to receive COPA (n=30) or LMA (n= 30) placement and then mechanically ventilated using a 60% nitrous oxide and 1% isoflurane in oxygen mixture (TV=8 ml kg(-1), RR=12 b.p.m., I/E=1/2). Haemodynamic variables were recorded 20 min after the midazolam premedication (baseline), and then every 1 min until 10 min after general anaesthesia induction. RESULTS: Nine patients of group COPA (30%) required chin lift, jaw thrust or head tilt to maintain adequate ventilation, while no problems were observed in the LMA group (P<0.0005); however, in no case did the designed extratracheal airway have to be removed due to unsuccessful mechanical ventilation, and no signs of gastric insufflation or regurgitation were reported. The maximum mean changes in haemodynamic variables were more marked after LMA placement (SAP: 12%+/-13%; DAP: 11%+/-18%; HR: 13%+/-16%) than COPA placement (SAP: -3%+/-18%; DAP: -5%+/-16%; HR: 4%+/-13%) (P<0.005, P<0.005, and P<0.01 for SAP, DAP and HR, respectively). Group LMA showed higher SAP and DAP values than group COPA only during the first 3 min after airway insertion. CONCLUSION: In healthy, anaesthetised patients, placing a cuffed oropharyngeal airway is associated with smaller cardiovascular changes after airway insertion compared with the laryngeal mask airway.     

Cuffed oropharyngeal airway as a suitable alternative to the laryngeal mask airway for minor outpatient surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the application of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway on anaesthetized adult patients undergoing minor outpatient surgery. METHODS: One hundred patients received intravenous fentanyl, propofol and N20 for the induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: a cuffed oropharyngeal airway group (n = 50) and a laryngeal mask airway group (n = 50). After insertion of the device, fibreoptic laryngoscopy was attempted and the degree of success scored. We then compared the first application success rate of both procedures while judging airway intervention requirement, fibreoptic scores, adverse airway events and haemodynamic tolerance. RESULTS: Both devices had an almost similar first-time placement rate (cuffed oropharyngeal airway 84% versus laryngeal mask airway 96%). The cuffed oropharyngeal airway required a higher number of airway interventions (P < 0.001). The laryngeal mask airway had a significantly better fibreoptic view compared with the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (P < 0.001). However, the number of adverse airway events was lower in the cuffed oropharyngeal airway group; there were no significant differences in adverse events and haemodynamic variables between the said two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the cuffed oropharyngeal airway was an effective alternative airway in spontaneously breathing patients during short procedures.     

Use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway as an alternative to the laryngeal mask airway with positive-pressure ventilation.

BACKGROUND: The cuffed oropharyngeal airway is a modified Guedel-type oral airway with a cuff at its distal end. The objectives of this study were to compare the ability of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway to provide positive-pressure ventilation during general anesthesia, and to assess their relative ease of use and ability to reduce total fresh gas flow rates. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized study, a cuffed oropharyngeal airway (n = 25) or a laryngeal mask airway (n = 25) device was inserted after induction of anesthesia intravenously using 2 mg/kg propofol. While anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide, the leak pressure, leak fraction (the fractional difference between the inspired and expired tidal volume), minimum fresh gas flow rate, and need for airway manipulations were determined. The anesthesia provider who inserted the device completed an evaluation form at the end of the 15-min study period. RESULTS: Positive-pressure ventilation was established successfully on the first attempt in 92% of the patients when the cuffed oropharyngeal airway was used and in 88% of the patients when the laryngeal mask airway device was used. However, manipulations of the airway device were necessary more frequently (8 vs. 1 patient; P < 0.05) and the leak pressure was less (22 +/- 6 cm water vs. 26 +/- 5 cm water; P < 0.05) with the cuffed oropharyngeal airway than with the laryngeal mask airway. In addition, the leak fraction (0.19 +/- 0.18 vs. 0.31 +/- 0.22; P < 0.05) and the minimum fresh gas flow rate (1.3 +/- 1.5 vs. 2.4 +/- 2.5; P = 0.12) were less in the laryngeal mask airway group. CONCLUSIONS: Positive-pressure ventilation is possible with the laryngeal mask airway and cuffed oropharyngeal airway devices. Although the cuffed oropharyngeal airway can be inserted easily by inexperienced users with a high first-attempt success rate (> 90%), manipulations of the device may be required to maintain a patent airway. The laryngeal mask airway device allows positive-pressure ventilation at slightly greater peak inspiratory pressures.     

Physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio during face mask, laryngeal mask, and cuffed oropharyngeal airway spontaneous ventilation

Objective: To compare the physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio and arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (ETCO₂) difference during spontaneous ventilation through a face mask, a laryngeal mask (LMA), or a cuffed oropharyngeal airway.

Design: Prospective, randomized, cross-over study.

Setting: Inpatient anesthesia at a university department of orthopedic surgery.

Patients: 20 ASA physical status I and II patients, without respiratory disease, who underwent ankle and foot surgery.

Interventions: After a peripheral nerve block was performed, propofol anesthesia was induced and then maintained with a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion (4 to 6 mg/kg/h). A face mask, a cuffed oropharyngeal airway, or an LMA were placed in each patient in a random sequence. After 15 minutes of spontaneous breathing through each of the airways, ventilatory variables, as well as arterial, end-tidal, and mixed expired CO₂ partial pressure, were measured, and physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio was calculated.

Measurements and Main Results: Expired minute volume and respiratory rate (RR) were lower with LMA (5.6 ± 1.2 L/min and 18 ± 3 breaths/min) and the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (5.7 ± 1 L/minand 18 ± 3 breaths/min) than the face mask (7.1 ± 0.9 L/min and 21 ± 3 breaths/min) (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.013, respectively). Physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio and arterial to end tidal CO₂ tension difference were similar with the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (3 ± 0.4 mmHg and 4.4 ± 1.4 mmHg) and LMA (3 ± 0.6 mmHg and 3.7 ± 1 mmHg) and lower than with the face mask (4 ± 0.5 mmHg and 6.7 ± 2 mmHg) (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion: Because of the increased dead space/tidal volume ratio, breathing through a face mask required higher RR and expired minute volume than either the cuffed oropharyngeal airway or LMA, which, in contrast, showed similar effects on the quality of ventilation in spontaneously breathing anesthetized patients.     

Relationship between arterial and end-tidal carbon dioxide pressures during anesthesia using a laryngeal tube

BACKGROUND: The Laryngeal Tube (LT), (VBM Medizintechnik, Sulz, Germany) is a relatively new supraglottic device for controlling the airway. Arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO(2)) can be estimated by monitoring the end-tidal tension of carbon dioxide (PETCO(2)). The relationship between PETCO(2) and PaCO(2) during controlled ventilation via the LT has not been reported. METHODS: During general anesthesia, 45 patients were mechanically ventilated using an LT. PETCO(2) and PaCO(2) were measured once PETCO(2) had reached a steady state. The LT was then removed and the trachea intubated using an endotracheal tube (ETT), and the identical ventilatory variables were resumed. Following stabilization, PETCO(2) was again determined and PaCO(2) estimated. RESULTS: The mean PETCO(2) and PaCO(2) values were 4.43 +/- 0.26 kPa and 4.67 +/- 0.32 kPa, respectively, during LT ventilation, and 4.36 +/- 0.23 kPa and 4.61 +/- 0.26 kPa, respectively, during ETT ventilation. Analysis of differences between the PETCO(2) and PaCO(2) values using the Bland and Altman method revealed a bias +/- precision of 0.24 +/- 0.15 kPa for LT and 0.27 +/- 0.15 kPa for ETT. The root mean square error was 0.28 for the LT and 0.30 for the ETT. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that for healthy adult patients mechanically ventilated via the LT, the PETCO(2) value reflects the PaCO(2) value as closely as when patients are ETT ventilated, allowing capnometry to be used to evaluate the adequacy of ventilation.     

Use of the Cuffed Oropharyngeal Airway as an Alternative to the Laryngeal Mask Airway with Positive-pressure Ventilation

Background: The cuffed oropharyngeal airway is a modified Guedel-type oral airway with a cuff at its distal end. The objectives of this study were to compare the ability of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway to provide positive-pressure ventilation during general anesthesia, and to assess their relative ease of use and ability to reduce total fresh gas flow rates.

Methods: In this prospective, randomized study, a cuffed oropharyngeal airway (n = 25) or a laryngeal mask airway (n = 25) device was inserted after induction of anesthesia intravenously using 2 mg/kg propofol. While anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide, the leak pressure, leak fraction (the fractional difference between the inspired and expired tidal volume), minimum fresh gas flow rate, and need for airway manipulations were determined. The anesthesia provider who inserted the device completed an evaluation form at the end of the 15-min study period.

Results: Positive-pressure ventilation was established successfully on the first attempt in 92% of the patients when the cuffed oropharyngeal airway was used and in 88% of the patients when the laryngeal mask airway device was used. However, manipulations of the airway device were necessary more frequently (8 vs. 1 patients; P < 0.05) and the leak pressure was less (22 +/- 6 cm water vs. 26 +/- 5 cm water; P < 0.05) with the cuffed oropharyngeal airway than with the laryngeal mask airway. In addition, the leak fraction (0.19 +/- 0.18 vs. 0.31 +/- 0.22; P < 0.05) and the minimum fresh gas flow rate (1.3 +/- 1.5 vs. 2.4 +/- 2.5; P = 0.12) were less in the laryngeal mask airway group.     

Minimum alveolar sevoflurane concentrations required for insertion of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway: a comparative study

Both the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway share a similar property of being less stimulating to the upper airway than the tracheal tube. This study was conducted to compare sevoflurane concentrations required for insertion of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway in elderly and young adult patients. Forty-one elderly (65-90 years) and 34 young adult (18-50 years) patients, scheduled for elective surgery during spontaneous breathing anaesthesia were randomly assigned to either the cuffed oropharyngeal airway or the laryngeal mask airway group. After a predetermined end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane had been established and maintained for at least 20 min, insertion of the device was attempted without neuromuscular relaxants or other adjuvants. Each concentration at which insertion of the device was attempted was predetermined by modification of Dixon's up-and-down method with 0.5% as the step size. Sevoflurane MACCOPA [mean 1.17 (SD 0.38)%, 0.77-1.56% (95% CI)] was significantly less than MACLMA [2.00 (0.52)%, 1.45-2.55%, p < 0.05] for elderly patients. Similarly, sevoflurane MACCOPA [1.33 (0.38)%, 0.94-1.73%] was significantly less than MACLMA [2.00 (0.42)%, 1.56-2.44%, p < 0.05] for young adult patients. There were no significant differences in either MACCOPA or MACLMA between the elderly and the young adult patients. We conclude that the insertion of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway can be accomplished at a lower sevoflurane concentration, and hence, is less stimulating to the upper airway than that of the laryngeal mask airway.     

Relationship between end-tidal and arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure using a cuffed oropharyngeal airway and a tracheal tube

We have compared the differences between end-tidal PE'CO2 and arterial PaCO2 carbon dioxide partial pressures during general anaesthesia using either a cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) or a tracheal tube (TT) in spontaneously breathing adult patients. After induction of anaesthesia, a COPA was inserted in 20 patients who were allowed to breathe spontaneously. When steady state was reached, PE'CO2 and PaCO2 were recorded. The COPA was removed, the trachea intubated with a TT and spontaneous ventilation allowed to resume. After a stable PE'CO2 was reestablished, PaCO2 was measured again and PE'CO2 recorded. Mean difference between PaCO2 and PE'CO2 with the COPA was 0.72 (SD 0.45) kPa and with the TT 0.64 (0.40) kPa (ns; paired t test). Our results suggest that Pe'CO2 is a clinically acceptable indicator of PaCO2 in adults breathing spontaneously via a COPA.      

The cuffed oropharyngeal airway vs. the laryngeal mask airway: a randomised cross-over study of oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic view in paralysed patients

We conducted a randomised cross-over study of 20 patients to test the hypothesis that oropharyngeal leak pressure and the fibreoptic view differ between the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and laryngeal mask airway in paralysed patients. We also tested the design premise that inflation of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway cuff elevates the epiglottis from the posterior pharyngeal wall. Both airways were inserted into each patient in random order. Oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic view were documented at zero volume and after each additional 10 ml up to the maximum recommended volume for each device. The laryngeal mask had a higher maximum (23 vs. 16 cmH2O, p = 0.03), minimum (9 vs. 2 cmH2O, p < 0.02) and overall (17 vs. 9 cmH2O, p < 0.001) oropharyngeal leak pressure compared with the cuffed oropharyngeal airway. The glottic inlet was visible more frequently with the laryngeal mask (96 vs. 39%, p < 0.0001). There was no elevation of the epiglottis from the posterior pharyngeal wall with the cuffed oropharyngeal airway. We conclude that the laryngeal mask forms a more effective seal and provides a better fibreoptic view of the glottic inlet than the cuffed oropharyngeal airway in paralysed patients. Inflation of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway cuff does not cause elevation of the epiglottis.     

腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术中呼气末CO2分压的变化及意义

目的观察腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中动脉血CO2分压（PaCO2）与呼气末CO2分压（PetCO2）差值Pa-ETCO2变化及其临床意义。方法腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术患者28例，于气管插管全身麻醉下完成手术，术中PETCO2维持在30～35mmHg左右，分别在麻醉后（T0），气腹第30min（T1），60min（T2），120min（T3），180min（T4）取桡动脉血行血气分析测PaCO2，据监测的PETCO2及血气分析获得的PaCO2，计算每个时间点的Pa-ETCO2。结果气腹后各时间点PaCO2，MBP，PPEAK，Pa-ETCO2明显增高（P〈0．05），人工气腹60min后，Pa-ETCO2发生显著变化（P〈0．01），部分患者出现CO2蓄积。气腹后PH值明显下降（P〈0．01）。结论腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中人工气腹60min后PETCO2不能真实反映PaCO2，当PETCO2维持在30-35mmHg时应监测PaCO2避免发生高碳酸血症。     

Intermittent CPAP: A New Mode of Ventilation during General Anesthesia

Background: Airway pressure-release ventilation provides ventilation comparable to controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV), but with lower peak airway pressures and less deadspace ventilation. To obtain these advantages for patients administered general anesthesia, the authors (1) designed a mode similar to airway pressure-release ventilation, intermittent continuous positive airway pressure (CPAPI), and compared its efficiency with that of CMV; and (2) assessed the accuracy of end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (PET (CO)2) as a monitor of the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO2) during CPAPI compared with during CMV.

Methods: Twenty anesthetized, tracheally intubated patients received baseline CMV that produced a PETCO2 of approximately 35 mmHg and a pulse oximetry value > 90%. Patients were assigned to undergo alternating trials of CMV and CPAPI. During CPAPI, CPAP was applied to the airway, removed for 1 s, and reapplied at a rate equal to the ventilator rate during CMV. The difference between the carbon dioxide tension in arterial blood and end-tidal gas [P(a - ET)CO2] and the calculation of PaCO2/minute ventilation quantified the efficiency of ventilation. Data were summarized as mean +/- SD and compared using the Student's test.

Results: Peak airway pressure (13 +/- 2 vs. 23 +/- 5 cm H2 O; P < 0.001) and minute ventilation (3.5 +/- vs. 4.6 +/- 1.2 l/min; P < 0.0001) were lower during CPAPI than during CMV. The value for PaCO2/minute ventilation (11.1 +/- 2.9 vs. 7.9 +/- 2.6 mmHg [middle dot] 1-1 [middle dot] min-1; P < 0.0001) was greater during CPAPI. P(a - ET)CO2 was always greater during CMV (6.3 +/- 1.6 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.9 mmHg; P < 0.0001) and was never > 3.5 mmHg during CPAPI.     

The target plasma concentration of propofol required to place laryngeal mask versus cuffed oropharyngeal airway

To determine the target plasma concentration of propofol required to place either a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or a cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA), we started a continuous target-controlled infusion of propofol in 60 ASA physical status I or II unpremedicated patients scheduled for minor orthopedic surgery with peripheral nerve block. The target plasma concentration of propofol was initially set at 2 microg/mL. When the effect-site calculated concentration of propofol was equal to the plasma concentration according to the computer simulation, the target plasma concentration was increased by 0.5-microg/mL steps until successful placement of either the LMA (n = 30) or the COPA (n = 30). The mean target plasma concentration of propofol required to place a LMA was 4.3 +/- 0.8 microg/mL compared with 3.2 +/- 0.6 microg/mL to place a COPA (P < 0.001). To successfully place the airways in 95% of patients, the target plasma concentration of propofol had to be increased up to 4 microg/mL for the COPA and 6 microg/mL for the LMA. We conclude that placing a LMA in healthy, unpremedicated patients requires target plasma concentrations of propofol higher than those required for placing a COPA. Implications: We evaluated the use of target-controlled infusion of propofol to place extratracheal airways in this prospective, randomized study and demonstrated that the target plasma concentration of propofol required to successfully place a laryngeal mask in >95% of healthy, unpremedicated patients is 6 microg/mL, compared with 4 microg/mL to place a cuffed oropharyngeal airway.     

A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway with the facemask and oropharyngeal airway for manual ventilation by first responders in children

In adults, first responders to a cardiopulmonary arrest provide better ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway than a facemask. It is unclear if the same is true in children. We investigated this by comparing the ability of 36 paediatric ward nurses to ventilate the lungs of 99 anaesthetised children (a model for cardiopulmonary arrest) using a laryngeal mask airway and using a facemask with an oropharyngeal airway. Anteroposterior chest wall displacement was measured using an ultrasonic detector. Nurses achieved successful ventilation in 74 (75%) of cases with the laryngeal mask airway and 76 (77%) with facemask and oropharyngeal airway (p = 0.89). Median (IQR [range]) time to first breath was longer for the laryngeal mask airway (48 (39–65 [8–149])) s than the facemask/airway (35 (25–53 [14–120]) s; p < 0.0001). In 10 cases (10%) the lungs were ventilated using the laryngeal mask airway but not using the facemask/oropharyngeal airway. We conclude that ventilation is achieved rapidly using a facemask and oropharyngeal airway, and that the laryngeal mask airway may represent a useful second line option for first responders.     

The effect of increased apparatus dead space and tidal volumes on carbon dioxide elimination and oxygen saturations in a low-flow anesthesia system

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if a large tidal volume (VT), with an unchanged end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PETco2), could improve arterial carbon dioxide elimination, oxygen saturation (Spo2), and arterial blood oxygenation. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, clinical study. SETTING: Single university hospital. PATIENTS: 60 ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for elective urologic or general surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatments: patients in group 1, nondead space (NDS), received a fresh gas flow of 1 L/min without added apparatus dead space volume. Patients in group 2, dead space (DS), received ventilation using an added dead space volume between the Y-piece and tracheal tube. In both groups, patients' lungs were ventilated to a fixed PETco2 value of 33.8 mmHg. Patients in the DS group were ventilated with VTs to maintain an airway plateau pressure (Pplateau) of 0.04 cm H2O/kg over initial plateau pressure. The corrugated tube was then adjusted to maintain a fixed PETco2. MEASUREMENTS: Dead space volumes, PETco2, arterial CO2 tension (Paco2), SpO2, arterial O2 tension (Pao2), VTs, and airway pressures were measured. MAIN RESULTS: Arterial CO2 tension was significantly lower in the DS group, 36 +/- 2.3 mmHg, compared with the NDS group, 37.5 +/- 2.3 mmHg (P < 0.05), and the difference between PETco2 and Paco2 was lower in the DS group than in the NDS group (P < 0.001). Oxygen saturation was 99% +/- 1.0% in the DS group compared with 98.5% +/- 1.5% in the NDS group (P < 0.05). Arterial O2 tension was 13.2 +/- 25.5 mmHg in the DS group and 119.1 +/- 30.2 mmHg in NDS group (not significant). CONCLUSION: Larger VTs, with an unchanged PETCO2 concentration created by an added apparatus dead space volume, improved arterial carbon dioxide elimination.     

La pression télé expiratoire en CO2 n’est pas un paramètre pertinent de surveillance d’un traumatisme crânien grave

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement between end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) and arterial CO2 (PaCO2) in patients with traumatic brain injury and to document the course of the (PaCO2-PETCO2) gradient over time. METHODS: Twenty one traumatic brain injury patients (Coma Glasgow Scale < or = 8) were included in this prospective observational study over a period of six months. Simultaneous determinations of PaCO2 and PETCO2 (by infrared capnometry) were recorded. Agreement between PaCO2 and PETCO2 was determined by the statistical method described by Bland and Altman. Changes in PETCO2 over time were compared with changes in PaCO2. Factors likely to explain a gradient superior to +/- 4 mmHg were explored. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven data pairs were obtained. The bias was 5.5 mmHg with a precision of 5.1 mmHg and limits of agreement ranged from -4.5 mmHg to 15.5 mmHg. The latter exceeded the predefined limits of agreement established to determine interchangeability between methods (+/- 4 mmHg). PETCO2 and PoCO2 changed in opposite directions in 20% of 90 consecutive measurements. Only the duration of ventilation was found to be significantly associated with a gradient superior to +/- 4 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: In this selected population of patients with severe traumatic brain injury, measurements of PETCO2 and PaCO2 are not interchangeable. Further the PoCO2-PETCO2 gradient is not stable over time and cannot predict variations of PaCO2. The use of PETCO2 instead of PaCO2 could be deleterious in patients in whom strict control of PaCO2 values is required.     

Relationship between invasive and noninvasive measurements of gas exchange in anesthetized infants and children

Minute ventilation (VE), tidal volume (VT), carbon dioxide elimination (VCO2), and end-tidal (PETCO2) and arterial CO2 tensions (PaCO2) were measured in 39 anesthetized infants and children with body weights ranging from 3.1 to 31 kg. Eighteen children had normal cardiopulmonary function, seven had acyanotic congenital heart disease, and 11 had cyanotic congenital heart disease. One child had left heart failure and pulmonary congestion, and two had severe parenchymal lung disease. To evaluate differences between pulmonary gas exchange calculated from PaCO2 versus PETCO2, dead space volume (VD) and alveolar ventilation (VA) based on a PaCO2 (VDa, VAa) as well as on PETCO2 (VDET, VAET) were performed, and correlations between PaCO2-PETCO2, VDa/VT-VDET/VT, and VAa-VAET were carried out. It was demonstrated that in normal children, as well as in those with acyanotic congenital heart disease, PETCO2 correlated closely with PaCO2 (r = 0.94, 0.98, respectively). In children with cyanotic congenital heart disease, however, correlation between PETCO2 and PaCO2 was relatively poor (r = 0.61). Mean values for PaCO2 were significantly higher than PETCO2 in the cyanotic children (P less than 0.01), resulting in significant underestimation of physiologic dead space (P less than 0.05) and significant overestimation of alveolar ventilation (P less than 0.01). In three patients with pulmonary disease, large differences between PaCO2 and PETCO2 were comparable with those observed in the children with cyanotic congenital heart disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Accuracy of end-tidal PCO2 measurements using a sidestream capnometer in infants and children ventilated with the Sechrist infant ventilator

To determine the accuracy of end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) measurements analyzed with a sidestream capnometer in infants and children whose lungs were ventilated with a Sechrist infant ventilator and an Ayre's t-piece, we compared PETCO2 measurements obtained from the proximal (PETCO2-p) and distal (PETCO2-d) ends of the tracheal tube to arterial PCO2 (PaCO2) in 37 healthy infants and children between 1.3 and 24.5 kg. Both PETCO2-p and PETCO2-d accurately approximated PaCO2, however, the mean (+/- SD) arterial to end-tidal PCO2 difference (delta(a-ET)PCO2) was significantly greater with proximal (1.27 +/- 1.54 mmHg) than with distal sampling (0.64 +/- 1.64 mmHg) (P less than 0.01). In the subgroup of patients who weighted less than 12 kg, the delta(a-ET)PCO2 using proximal gas sampling (1.94 +/- 1.29 mmHg) was also significantly greater than it was using distal sampling (0.74 +/- 1.31 mmHg) (P less than 0.001). We conclude that although statistically different, both proximal and distal estimates of PETCO2 provide acceptable estimates of PaCO2 in healthy infants and children who are ventilated with a Sechrist infant ventilator and an Ayre's t-piece system.     

Fibreoptic intubation using the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and Aintree intubation catheter

A cuffed oropharyngeal airway has recently been introduced which has larger internal dimensions than a comparable Guedel airway. This allows a ventilation/exchange bougie, the Aintree Intubation Catheter, mounted on a fibreoptic laryngoscope to pass through it. Its 15-mm connector and pharyngeal cuff suggested the possibility of using a Rüsch sealed-port angle piece to allow ventilation through the oropharyngeal airway during fibreoptic laryngoscopy. This study investigated using this equipment to intubate the trachea through the cuffed oropharyngeal airway in paralysed patients, whilst maintaining ventilation manually with a Bain system. In 20 patients, airway control was satisfactory throughout and tracheal intubation was accomplished without complications. The cuffed oropharyngeal airway was easy to manipulate to improve a suboptimal fibreoptic view of the larynx. This may give it an advantage over the laryngeal mask airway when used as a ventilation/intubation conduit.     

A comparison of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) during manually controlled positive pressure ventilation

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) during positive pressure ventilation (PPV) and to compare its reliability and efficacy with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: University Hospital. PATIENTS: 60 adult ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for urologic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to be ventilated with a COPA (n = 33) or a LMA (n = 27) during a standardized anesthetic procedure. Following preoxygenation and induction with alfentanil and propofol, the respective airways were inserted. Patients were ventilated manually with the reservoir bag of the anesthesia respirator. Inspiratory airway pressure was limited to 20 cm H2O, and the target tidal volume was 7 ml/kg. Respiratory rate was adjusted to achieve an end-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide of 35 mmHg. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol, nitrous oxide in oxygen, and alfentanil, as appropriate. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We evaluated ease of insertion (nominal scale: easy, moderate, difficult, or impossible) and recorded the number of maneuvers performed during insertion until an airtight seal of the airway was achieved. Reliability for "hands free" ventilation--defined as ventilation without the need to further augment the position of the airway device manually--was determined (nominal scale: adequate ventilation, adequate ventilation with manual assistance, and inadequate ventilation leading to airway change). Ventilation and oxygenation parameters were derived from the anesthesia respirator and a capillary blood gas sample, respectively. The incidence of laryngopharyngeal discomfort and the amount of salivation were assessed by nominal scales. The COPA was easier to insert than the LMA (p < 0.001), but more positional maneuvers (p < 0.001) were necessary with this device. "Hands free" ventilation was achieved less often with the COPA (p < 0.02). Ventilation and oxygenation were comparable with both devices. The COPA was associated with less salivation (p < 0.01) and laryngopharyngeal discomfort (p < 0.05) than the LMA. CONCLUSION: Although effective ventilation can be accomplished with both devices, the LMA is more reliable for "hands free" ventilation than the COPA. The lower incidence of laryngopharyngeal discomfort and salivation with the COPA may be beneficial for patients at risk for developing laryngospasm.