Results of transosseous reattachment for distal rupture of the biceps tendon. Evaluation of results

Avulsion of the distal biceps brachii tendon is an uncommon injury. This is a retrospective review of cases operated in our department by transosseous suture fixation on the radial tuberosity, using the single anterior incision. Between 2000?and 2007, a total of 10?patients with distal biceps tendon injury were included. All were men, with an average age of 39?years. The most common mechanism was passive extension against active flexion. The dominant limb was affected in all patients. Clinical diagnosis was the rule. Surgical reattachment to the radial tuberosity through the anterior approach to the elbow was performed. The preoperative period was one week in three cases, between one and three weeks in five cases, and superior to three weeks in two cases. Clinical and instrumental evaluation of the results was done. Average follow-up was 48?months. Subjective results were good in seven cases, acceptable in two cases and poor in one case. Nine patients return to their previous level activity with no limitations. The average range of motion was 0° of extension to 135° of flexion. Strength testing of the injured limbs, compared to the contralateral, using the criteria described by Baker and Bierwagen, revealed a loss of 22% of supination strength and 32% of supination endurance. There was a loss of 14% of flexion strength and 27% of flexion endurance. There were two cases of superficial surgical site infection. There were no cases of nerve damage or heterotopic bone formation. Two main factors were found to explain the poor outcomes: experience of the surgeon and a long preoperative delay. Despite the limitations of this study, we found that transosseous reattachment of the biceps' distal tendon to the radial tuberosity can restore supination. Strength and endurance for supination can be better restored by early intervention. Complications are easily avoided if surgery is performed early and by experts.     

Pectoralis major tendon rupture: A biomechanical analysis of repair techniques

Rupture of the insertion of the pectoralis major muscle to the proximal humerus is becoming a common injury. Repair of these ruptures increases patient satisfaction, strength, and cosmesis, and shortens return to competitive sports. Several repair techniques have been described, but recently many surgeons are using suture anchors. The traditional repair technique uses transosseous sutures, but no study has biomechanically compared the strength of these two repair techniques in human cadavers. Twelve fresh‐frozen human shoulder specimens were dissected. The pectoralis major tendon insertion was cut from the bone and repaired using one of the two repair techniques: specimens were randomly assigned to transosseous trough with suture tied over bone versus four suture anchors. The fixation constructs were pulled to failure at 4 mm/s on a materials testing system. The mean ultimate failure load of the transosseous repairs was 611 N and the mean ultimate failure load of the suture anchor repair was 620 N. The mean stiffness of the transosseous repair was 32 and 28 N/mm for the suture anchor group. We found no statistically significant difference between these two repair techniques. © 2011 Orthopaedic Research Society Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:1783–1787, 2011     

Biomechanical evaluation of open suture anchor fixation versus interference screw for biceps tenodesis

Biceps tenodesis provides reliable pain relief for patients with biceps tendon abnormality. Previous cadaver studies have shown that, for biceps tenodesis, an interference screw provides biomechanical strength to failure superior to that of suture anchors. This finding has led some providers to conclude that screw fixation for biceps tenodesis is superior to suture anchor fixation. The purpose of the current study was to test the hypothesis that the strength of a 2-suture-anchor technique with closing of the transverse ligament is equal to that of interference screw fixation for biceps tenodesis.In 6 paired, fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulder specimens, we excised the soft tissue except for the biceps tendon and the transverse ligament. We used 2 different methods for biceps tenodesis: (1) suture anchor repair with closing of the transverse ligament over the repair, and (2) interference screw fixation of the biceps tendon in the bicipital groove. Each specimen was preloaded with 5 N and then stretched to failure at 5 mm/sec on a materials testing machine. The load-to-failure forces of each method of fixation were recorded and compared. Mean loads to failure for the suture anchor and interference screw repairs were 263.2 N (95% confidence interval [CI], 221.7-304.6) and 159.4 N (95% CI, 118.4-200.5), respectively. Biceps tenodesis using suture anchors and closure of the transverse ligament provided superior load to failure than did interference screw fixation. This study shows that mini-open techniques using 2 anchors is a biomechanically comparable method to interference fixation for biceps tendon tenodesis.     

Pullout strength of suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of rotator cuff tears may be complicated by osteoporosis of the proximal part of the humerus. The purpose of this study was to determine whether pullout strength of suture anchors is affected by the location of the anchor placement and by bone mineral density. We hypothesized that higher bone mineral density is associated with higher pullout strength of suture anchors. METHODS: Peripheral quantitative computed tomography was used to measure total, trabecular, and cortical bone mineral density in different regions of the lesser and greater tuberosities in seventeen cadaveric humeri. Suture anchors were inserted into individual regions and subjected to cyclic loading. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess differences in bone mineral density and load to failure between regions of interest. Pearson correlation was used to determine the association between bone mineral density and pullout strength of suture anchors. RESULTS: Total, trabecular, and cortical bone mineral densities were an average of 50%, 50%, and 10% higher, respectively, in the proximal part of the tuberosities compared with the distal part (p < 0.01). Within the proximal part of the greater tuberosity, trabecular bone mineral density of the posterior region and cortical bone mineral density of the middle region were, on the average, 25% and 16% higher, respectively, than the densities in the other regions (p < 0.01). Load to failure in the proximal part of the tuberosities was an average of 53% higher than that in the distal part (p < 0.01). The lesser tuberosity showed, on the average, a 32% higher load to failure than did the greater tuberosity (p < 0.01). Within the proximal part of the greater tuberosity, loads to failure in the anterior and middle regions were, on the average, 62% higher than the load to failure in the posterior region (p < 0.01). Overall positive correlations were found between bone mineral density and load to failure (0.65 相似文献   

Primary fixation strength of rotator cuff repair techniques: a comparative study

Purpose:The goal of the study was to compare the primary fixation strength of transosseous suture, suture anchor, and hybrid repair techniques for rotator cuff repair.Type of Study:Animal model experiment.Methods:Thirty-two sheep shoulders were divided into 4 homogeneous groups, according to bone density and tendon dimensions. Infraspinatus tendons were transected from their insertions and reattached using 4 different techniques. Group 1 was repaired with a single Mason-Allen stitch and 2 transosseous tunnels for each end of the suture, knotted on the lateral cortex of proximal humerus; group 2 was repaired with double Mason-Allen stitches and 2 transosseous tunnels; group 3 was repaired with 2 Corkscrews (Arthrex, Germany); and group 4 was repaired with 2 Corkscrews combined with a single Mason-Allen transosseous suture. All specimens were tested for their fixation strengths with a material testing system.Results:The mode of failure in group 1 was mainly suture breakage. In groups 3 and 4, the tendons pulled out from the sutures. In group 2, sutures broke the bony bridge between the 2 tunnels. The mean load to failure value was 160.31 ± 34.59 N in group 1, 199.36 ± 11.73 N in group 2, 108.32 ± 15.98 N in group 3, and 214.24 ± 28.52 N in group 4. Anchor fixation was significantly weaker compared with other groups (P <.001). Combination of a transosseous suture and anchor fixation (group 4) was significantly stronger than the single transosseous suture (group 1) and double anchor techniques (group 3) (P <.001).Conclusions:Hybrid technique was the strongest among the tested rotator cuff repair techniques. With the addition of one transosseous suture to two anchors, the strength of the repair could be doubled.     

A biomechanical comparison of EndoButton versus suture anchor repair of distal biceps tendon injuries

The purpose of this study was to compare suture anchor and EndoButton repair of distal biceps injuries in a human bone-tendon model. Right and left arm repairs were alternately performed with either the EndoButton or 2 single-loaded 5-mm suture anchors. Each construct was cyclically loaded by use of a servohydraulic materials testing machine. Initial and final displacements were recorded. All repairs were then loaded to ultimate failure. Ten millimeters of displacement was designated the clinical failure point. The EndoButton group had more stiffness than the suture anchor group during initial cyclic loading (P = .01). There were no differences in final displacement measured after cyclic loading (2.06 mm for suture anchors and 2.58 mm for EndoButton). The EndoButton group had a 16% greater ultimate tensile load than the suture anchor group (274.77 N vs 230.06 N). The EndoButton group also had a 16% higher load to clinical failure (249.95 N vs 209.56 N). These differences were not statistically significant. The EndoButton and suture anchors provide comparable fixation strength for the repair and rehabilitation of distal biceps tendon ruptures.     

Distal biceps tendon injuries: diagnosis and management.

Rupture of the distal biceps tendon occurs most commonly in the dominant extremity of men between 40 and 60 years of age when an unexpected extension force is applied to the flexed arm. Although previously thought to be an uncommon injury, distal biceps tendon ruptures are being reported with increasing frequency. The rupture typically occurs at the tendon insertion into the radial tuberosity in an area of preexisting tendon degeneration. The diagnosis is made on the basis of a history of a painful, tearing sensation in the antecubital region. Physical examination demonstrates a palpable and visible deformity of the distal biceps muscle belly with weakness in flexion and supination. The ability to palpate the tendon in the antecubital fossa may indicate partial tearing of the biceps tendon. Plain radiographs may show hypertrophic bone formation at the radial tuberosity. Magnetic resonance imaging is generally not required to diagnose a complete rupture but may be useful in the case of a partial rupture. Early surgical reattachment to the radial tuberosity is recommended for optimal results. A modified two-incision technique is the most widely used method of repair, but anterior single-incision techniques may be equally effective provided the radial nerve is protected. The patient with a chronic rupture may benefit from surgical reattachment, but proximal retraction and scarring of the muscle belly can make tendon mobilization difficult, and inadequate length of the distal biceps tendon may necessitate tendon augmentation. Postoperative rehabilitation must emphasize protected return of motion for the first 8 weeks after repair. Formal strengthening may begin as early as 8 weeks, with a return to unrestricted activities, including lifting, by 5 months.     

The distal biceps tendon: footprint and relevant clinical anatomy

PURPOSE: There is little information in the literature describing the anatomy of the biceps tendon insertion. The purpose of this study was to map the footprint of the biceps tendon insertion on the bicipital tuberosity and to report on the relevant anatomy to assist surgeons with correct tendon orientation during surgical repair. METHODS: Fifteen fresh-frozen adult upper extremities were used in this study. The relationships between the long head of the biceps tendon, the short head of the biceps tendon, the muscle bellies, and the distal tendon orientation were examined. The length, width, and area of the biceps tendon insertion were measured. RESULTS: In all specimens examined, the biceps musculotendinous unit rotated 90 degrees externally from origin to insertion. The long head of the distal tendon was inserted onto the proximal aspect of the bicipital tuberosity, while the short head of the distal tendon was inserted onto the distal aspect of the tuberosity. The lacertus fibrosus, in all specimens, originated from the distal short head of the biceps tendon. On average, the biceps tendon insertion started 23 mm distal to the articular margin of the radial head. The average length of the biceps tendon insertion on the tuberosity was 21 mm, and the average width was 7 mm. The average total area of the biceps tendon insertion (footprint) was 108 mm(2). The average area of the long head of the biceps tendon insertion was 48 mm(2), and the average area of the short head of the biceps tendon insertion was 60 mm(2). CONCLUSIONS: Landmarks have been identified that will allow anatomic orientation of the distal biceps tendon during operative repair. The distal short head of the biceps tendon has a consistent relationship with the lacertus fibrosus and a distinct insertion on the bicipital tuberosity. The dimensions of the distal biceps tendon footprint have been determined to assist with bone tunnel or suture anchor placement during surgical repair.     

Anatomical repair of distal biceps brachii tendon rupture through a limited anterior approach

To avoid the extended anterior or the two-incision approach to the radius, we present a limited anterior approach for anatomical reattachment at the radial tuberosity of the distal biceps brachii tendon complete rupture using suture anchors. Our clinical experience in nine patients showed that secure fixation obtained with the suture anchors, limited surgical approach and anatomical reconstruction allow for early mobilization and rapid return of function, and provide excellent long-term results with acceptable complications. We suggest using the limited anterior approach in patients with early (less than 6 weeks) distal biceps brachii tendon rupture.     

Acute distal biceps tendon rupture--a new surgical technique using a de-tensioning suture to brachialis

Acute distal biceps rupture is a devastating injury in the young athlete and surgical repair offers the only chance of a full recovery. We report a new surgical technique used in 14 cases of acute distal tendon rupture in which the 'suture anchor technique' and a de-tensioning suture was employed. In this procedure the distal end of the biceps is re-attached to the radial tuberosity using a sliding whip stitch suture and the proximal part of the distal tendon repair attached to the underlying brachialis muscle with absorbable sutures. This restores correct anatomical alignment and isometric pull on the distal tendon and de-tensions the repair in the early post-operative period, allowing early rehabilitation and an early return to activity. In all cases patients regained a full pre-injury level of sporting activity at a mean period of 6.2 months (2-9 months).     

Repair of distal biceps tendon rupture with the Biotenodesis screw

Background Distal biceps tendon ruptures are uncommon injuries with only around 300 cases reported in the literature. Current management tends to favour anatomical reinsertion of the tendon into the radial tuberosity, especially in young and active individuals. These injuries are commonly repaired using either a single anterior incision with suture anchors or the Boyd-Anderson dual incision technique.Case report We report the use of a bioabsorbable interference screw for the repair of distal biceps tendon rupture using a minimal incision technique. In this technique the avulsed tendon and a bioabsorbable screw are secured in a drill hole on the radial tuberosity using whip stitch and fibre wire sutures according to Biotenodesis system guidelines.Conclusion The technique described requires minimal volar dissection that is associated with a reduced number of synostosis and posterior interosseous nerve injuries. The bioabsorbable interference screw has all the advantages of being biodegradable and has been shown to have greater pullout strength than suture anchors. It is also a reasonable alternative to titanium screws in terms of primary fixation strength. The strong fixation provided allows early active motion and return to previous activities as seen in our case.     

Button Fixation Technique for Achilles Tendon Reinsertion: A Biomechanical Study

Chronic insertional tendinopathy of the Achilles tendon is a frequent and disabling pathologic entity. Operative treatment is indicated for patients for whom nonoperative management has failed. The treatment can consist of the complete detachment of the tendon insertion and extensive debridement. We biomechanically tested a new operative technique that uses buttons for fixation of the Achilles tendon insertion on the posterior calcaneal tuberosity and compared it with 2 standard bone anchor techniques. A total of 40 fresh-frozen cadaver specimens were used to compare 3 fixation techniques for reinserting the Achilles tendon: single row anchors, double row anchors, and buttons. The ultimate loads and failure mechanisms were recorded. The button assembly (median load 764 N, range 713 to 888) yielded a median fixation strength equal to 202% (range 137% to 251%) of that obtained with the double row anchors (median load 412 N, range 301 to 571) and 255% (range 213% to 317%) of that obtained with the single row anchors (median load 338 N, range 241 to 433N). The most common failure mechanisms were suture breakage with the buttons (55%) and pull out of the implant with the double row (70%) and single row (85%) anchors. The results of the present biomechanical cadaver study have shown that Achilles tendon reinsertion fixation using the button technique provides superior pull out strength than the bone anchors tested.     

Cyclic loading of anchor-based rotator cuff repairs: Confirmation of the tension overload phenomenon and comparison of suture anchor fixation with transosseous fixation

Previous experimental studies of failure of rotator cuff repair have involved single pull to ultimate load. Such an experimental design does not represent the cyclic loading conditions experienced in vivo. We created 1 ×2 cm rotator cuff defects in 16 cadaver shoulders, repaired each defect with three MitekRC suture anchors (Mitek Surgical Products, Inc, Westwood, MA) using simple sutures of No. 2 Ethibond, and cyclically loaded the repairs by a servohydraulic materials test system actuator at physiological rates and loads (rate of 33 mm/s, load 180 N). A progressive gap was noted in each specimen, for a 100% rate of failure of the repairs. The central suture always failed first and by the largest magnitude, confirming tension overload centrally. One specimen exhibited combined bone and tendon failure, but the other 15 specimens failed through the tendon. Overall, the repairs failed to 5 mm and 10 mm at an average of 61 cycles and 285 cycles, respectively. Half the specimens were less than 45 years of age and had a 5-mm and 10-mm failure at an average of 107 and 478 cycles, respectively. The other half were over 45 years of age and failed to 5 mm and 10 mm at an average of 17 and 91 cycles, respectively, indicating more rapid failure of the rotator cuff tendons in the older group, and this was statistically significant (P ≤ .02). Comparison of suture anchor fixation in this study with transosseous bone tunnel fixation in a previous cyclic loading study at this institution indicates that bone fixation by suture anchors is significantly less prone to failure than bone fixation through bone tunnels (P = .0008). Changing the bone fixation from bone tunnels to suture anchors effectively transferred the weak link from bone to tendon.     

Osteochondroma of the bicipital tuberosity causing an avulsion of the distal biceps tendon

Osteochondromas are one of the most common benign bone tumors. They usually arise from the metaphyses of long bones. Involvement of the bicipital tuberosity is rare. To date, no reports have described avulsed rupture of the distal biceps tendon caused by an osteochondroma of the bicipital tuberosity. This article presents a case of avulsion of the distal biceps tendon secondary to sessile osteochondroma of the bicipital tuberosity in a 65-year-old right-handed sedentary worker who presented with insidious pain and limited motion in his left elbow for 2 months. Intraoperative findings showed a bony mass of 25×23×5 mm with osteocartilaginous nodules on the bicipital tuberosity. The distal biceps tendon with an avulsed bony fragment was displaced proximally, with a 20-mm gap between the tendon and the bicipital tuberosity. After complete excision of the mass, footprint preparation at the bicipital tuberosity was performed using a 4.0-mm burr and anatomic reattachment of the distal biceps tendon with a 5.0-mm suture anchor. The pathologic diagnosis of osteochondroma was confirmed microscopically. We suggest that osteochondroma of the bicipital tuberosity be considered as a cause of painful limitation of forearm rotation or avulsed rupture of the distal biceps tendon.     

Distal biceps tendon rupture: biomechanical analysis of repair strength of the Bio-Tenodesis screw versus suture anchors

The purpose of this study was to compare the strength and stiffness of distal biceps tendon ruptures repaired with either a Bio-Tenodesis screw or suture anchor technique in a cadaveric model. Ten matched pairs of cadaveric arms underwent simulated distal biceps tendon ruptures and were repaired with either a Bio-Tenodesis screw or suture anchor technique. We analyzed pullout strength, stiffness, and mode of failure for each construct. The mean pullout strength of the repair with a Bio-Tenodesis screw was significantly higher (192 N [SD, 42.5 N] vs 147 N [SD, 29.5 N], P < .013). Use of the Bio-Tenodesis screw is an effective means of repairing distal biceps tendon ruptures. It provides significantly more initial pullout strength compared with suture anchors. This could potentially allow more aggressive rehabilitation and faster return to function.     

A Transosseous Suture as an Alternative to Suture Anchor on Anterior-Avulsion Greater Tuberosity Fragment Fixation in Neer Three-Part Proximal Humeral Fracture: A Biomechanical Study

Objective

Greater tuberosity (GT) fragments were communicated, and additional techniques to increase the GT fragment stability after the locking plate fixation was necessary. This study aimed to analyze the reinforcement effects on the anterior-avulsion GT fragment in Neer three-part proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) using transosseous suture and suture anchor techniques.

Methods

Eighteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulder specimens were used in the study. Standardized fracture of the GT and surgical neck was created in 18 human cadaveric proximal humerus. The GT fragments were reinforced with transosseous suture (TS), suture anchor (SA), and suture in addition to the PHILOS plate fixation. The fixed humerus was tested by applying static loading to the supraspinatus tendon. Load forces and fragment displacement were evaluated by a biomechanical testing machine, and the load to 3- and 5-mm displacements, load to failure, and mode of failure were recorded for all specimens. Nonparametric variables were examined by the Kruskal–Wallis test, and the Bonferroni post hoc test was used to analyze the mean loads to create 3- and 5-mm displacements as well as the failure load.

Results

The age, female proportion, and bone mineral density showed no statistically significant differences between the three groups. The mean loading force to create 3-mm and 5-mm displacement in the TS group (254.9 ± 77.4, 309.6 ± 152.7) were significantly higher than those in the suture group (136.1 ± 16.7, 193.4 ± 14.5) (P = 0.024, P = 0.005). For the SA group, the force to create 3- and 5-mm displacement (204.3 ± 60.9, 307.8 ± 73.5) were comparable to those in the TS group (P = 0.236, P = 0.983). Moreover, the loading force to failure in the TS group (508.6 ± 217.7) and SA group (406.6 ± 114.9) was significantly higher than that in the suture group (265.9 ± 52.1) (P = 0.021, P = 0.024). In the TS group, three failed due to tendon-bone junction rupture; bone tunnel broken occurred in two specimens; suture rupture could also be seen in one specimen. All specimens in the suture group failed because of suture rupture. In the SA group, three specimens failed due to suture rupture; two failed secondary to tendon-bone junction rupture; and one failed because of shaft fracture.

Conclusions

Transosseous suture is a new type of reinforcement for GT fragment in Neer-three part PHFs. The transosseous suture was superior to the suture only in the reinforcement of the anterior-avulsion GT fragment of Neer three-part PHFs, and it had comparable biomechanical strength to the suture anchor.     

Über die Primärfestigkeit konventioneller und alternativer Nahttechniken der RotatorenmanschetteEine biomechanische Untersuchung

The aim of this biomechanical study was to evaluate rotator cuff repair strength using different suture anchor techniques compared to conventional repair, taking into consideration the native strength of the supraspinatus tendon. Therefore, a defined defect of the supraspinatus was created in 50 freshly frozen cadaver specimen (group size n = 10; median age at death: 56 years). Five methods were employed for cuff repair: standard transosseous suture, modified transosseous suture with patch augmentation and three suture anchors (Acufex Wedge TAG, Acufex Rod TAG und Mitek GII). The maximum tensile load of the five techniques was: standard transosseous suture, 410 N; modified transosseous suture, 552 N; Wedge TAG, 207 N; Rod TAG, 217 N; Mitek GII, 186 N. The difference between the suture anchor and standard techniques were highly significant (P < 0.001). In this series, the Mitek Gll anchor showed the lowest anchor dislocation rate at 3% (n = 1). The Wedge TAG system had a dislocation rate of 27% (n = 8) and the Rod TAG system 43% (n = 13). Suture anchor techniques revealed about 20%, the standard technique 34% and its modification 60% of the hypothetically calculated native tendon strength. Compared to conventional transosseous suture techniques, the use of the suture anchors tested in this series does not significantly increase the primary fixation strength of rotator cuff repair. The metallic implant with two barbs (Mitek GII) seems to be superior to the polyacetal anchors when inserted into the spongiform bone of the greater tubercle. The considerably weaker repair strength needs to be taken into consideration in postoperative patient rehabilitation, especially after the use of suture anchors.     

Repair of distal biceps tendon rupture with suture anchors and a single anterior incision: a review of six cases

We present a retrospective review of six cases of distal biceps tendon repair with a mean follow-up of 1 year. All patients were men aged between 34 and 62 years. In all patients, the injury was sustained with application of an unanticipated large load to the flexed arm. All but one patient was operated within a week of the injury. All six cases were operated through a single anterior incision and the torn tendon ends fixed to the radial tuberosity with implantable suture anchors. All patients were reviewed subjectively and objectively. All but one returned to preinjury activity within 6 months. One patient developed superficial radial nerve neurapraxia, which recovered, and one developed a superficial wound infection, which required treatment with oral antibiotics and surgical excision of the sinus. We believe that operative repair of distal biceps tendon rupture using a single anterior incision and suture anchors is a safe and effective method of treating theses injuries.     

Distal biceps tendon repair: anchor versus transosseous suture fixation

Suture anchor fixation and transosseous suture fixation were compared in 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric radii using either No. 2 braided polyester suture or single Mainstay 3.5-mm threaded anchors (made at the time by Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ) with No. 2 suture. Suture fixation failed at a mean strength of 162 N (range, 129-179 N), anchor fixation at 136 N (range, 121-150 N). Neither technique is strong enough to safely allow immediate biceps activity. Nevertheless, suture anchor fixation to the radial tuberosity offers a lower but clinically comparable strength to transosseous suture fixation while limiting postoperative risks.     

A looping operation to restore the distally ruptured tendon of the bicipital muscle

Surgical Principles The ruptured end of the tendon is bisected. An oval bone trough is made through the proximal radius and one of the tendon halves is pulled through it from the ulnar side. The other half is looped around the radius and the ends are then sutured together. Thus an anatomical reinsertion of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii muscle is achieved. The transosseous fixation of the distal biceps tendon was described in 1927 by Bunnel [1] and 1931 by Platt [5]. Modifications were established in 1928 by Kerschner [3], in 1938 by Thomsen [6], and in 1962 by Lange [4]. These techniques also attempt to reinsert the tendon anatomically. Revised Version from: Operat. Orthop. Traumatol. 4 (1992), 185–193 (German Edition).