Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning

The purpose of this study was to assess the radiation exposure of patients in several standard protocols in multi-slice CT (MSCT). Scanning protocols for neck, chest, abdomen, and spine were examined on a Somatom Plus 4 Volume Zoom MSCT (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with changing slice collimation (4×1, 4×2.5, and 4×5 mm), and pitch factors (1, 1.5, and 2). Effective doses were calculated from LiF–TLD measurements at several organ sites using an Alderson-Rando phantom and compared with calculations using the weighted CTDI. Effective dose for MSCT of the neck was 2.8 mSv. For different protocols for MSCT of the chest, 7.5–12.9 mSv were found. In abdominal MSCT protocols, effective dose varied between 12.4 and 16.1 mSv. The MSCT of the spine may lead to 12 mSv. An excellent correlation between the effective dose as determined by LiF–TLD and the calculated effective dose using the weighted CTDI could be demonstrated; however, a difference of up to 30% (mean 14.3%) was noted. Standard protocols for MSCT as measured in this study showed effective doses of up to16 mSv. Phantom measurement data show a good correlation to estimations using the weighted CTDI. Electronic Publication     

Radiation dose evaluation in 64-slice CT examinations with adult and paediatric anthropomorphic phantoms

The objective of this study was to evaluate the organ dose and effective dose to patients undergoing routine adult and paediatric CT examinations with 64-slice CT scanners and to compare the doses with those from 4-, 8- and 16-multislice CT scanners. Patient doses were measured with small (<7 mm wide) silicon photodiode dosemeters (34 in total), which were implanted at various tissue and organ positions within adult and 6-year-old child anthropomorphic phantoms. Output signals from photodiode dosemeters were read on a personal computer, from which organ and effective doses were computed. For the adult phantom, organ doses (for organs within the scan range) and effective doses were 8–35 mGy and 7–18 mSv, respectively, for chest CT, and 12–33 mGy and 10–21 mSv, respectively, for abdominopelvic CT. For the paediatric phantom, organ and effective doses were 4–17 mGy and 3–7 mSv, respectively, for chest CT, and 5–14 mGy and 3–9 mSv, respectively, for abdominopelvic CT. Doses to organs at the boundaries of the scan length were higher for 64-slice CT scanners using large beam widths and/or a large pitch because of the larger extent of over-ranging. The CT dose index (CTDI_vol), dose–length product (DLP) and the effective dose values using 64-slice CT for the adult and paediatric phantoms were the same as those obtained using 4-, 8- and 16-slice CT. Conversion factors of DLP to the effective dose by International Commission on Radiological Protection 103 were 0.024 mSv⋅mGy⁻¹⋅cm⁻¹ and 0.019 mSv⋅mGy⁻¹⋅cm⁻¹ for adult chest and abdominopelvic CT scans, respectively.X-ray CT scanners have made remarkable advances over the past few years, contributing to the improvement of diagnostic image quality and the reduction of examination time. CT scanners with 64 slices, the clinical use of which started quite recently in many medical facilities, has enabled a large number of thin slices to be acquired in a single rotation. 64-slice CT technology accelerated the practical use of three-dimensional body imaging techniques such as coronary CT angiography and CT colonography with an increasing number of CT examinations. The increase in CT examination frequency not only for adults but also for children and the higher doses in CT examinations compared with other X-ray diagnostic procedures have raised concerns about patient doses and safety. An understanding of patient doses requires the evaluation of organ and effective doses for patients undergoing CT examinations, although these dose values in 64-slice CT scans have seldom been reported.One common method for estimating organ and effective doses is dose calculation from the CT dose index (CTDI) or dose–length product (DLP), which are both used as readily available indicators of radiation dose in CT examinations. Organ and effective doses can be estimated from the CTDI or DLP, and conversion factors derived from Monte Carlo simulation of photon interactions within a simplified mathematical model of the human body [1]. Another method is based on measurement using thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLDs) implanted in various organ positions within an anthropomorphic phantom [2–6]. Although TLD dosimetry is considered to be the standard method for measuring absorbed doses in a phantom, the dose measurement is laborious and time consuming. Hence, we devised an in-phantom dosimetry system using silicon photodiode dosemeters implanted in various organ positions, where absorbed dose at each position could be read electronically. In the present study, we evaluated organ and effective doses with 64-slice CT scan protocols used clinically for adult and paediatric patients undergoing chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations. We compared the doses with published dose values for 4-, 8- and 16-slice CT, and indicated the conversion factor of DLP to the effective dose in each examination of the chest and abdomen–pelvis for 64-slice CT scanners.     

Application of European Commission reference dose levels in CT examinations in Crete, Greece

The purpose of this study was to apply European Commission reference dose levels (EC RDLs) to routine CT examinations. The dosimetric quantities proposed in the European Guidelines (EG) for CT are weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDI(w)) for a single slice and dose-length product (DLP) for a complete examination. Patient-related data as well as technical parameters for brain, chest, abdomen and pelvis examinations were collected for four CT scanners in the Euromedica Medical Center. Computed tomography dose index (CTDI) measurements were performed on each scanner and CTDI(w), DLP and effective dose E were estimated for each type of examination for a random sample of 10 typical patients. Mean values of CTDI(w) had a range of 27.0-52.0 mGy for brain and 13.9-26.9 mGy for chest, abdomen and pelvis examinations. Mean values of DLP had a range of 430-758 mGy cm for brain, 348-807 mGy cm for chest, 278-582 mGy cm for abdomen and 306-592 mGy cm for pelvis examinations. Mean values of E were 1.4 mSv for brain, 10.9 mSv for chest, 7.1 mSv for abdomen and 9.3 mSv for pelvis examinations. Results confirm that the Euromedica Medical Center meets EC RDLs for brain, abdomen and pelvis examinations, in terms of radiation dose and examination technique. As far as chest examination is concerned, although CTDI(w) of each scanner is within proposed values, the DLP is consistently exceeded, probably because of the large irradiation volume length L. It is anticipated that a reduction of L, or product mAs, or their combination, will reduce DLP without affecting image quality.     

Fetal radiation dose from CT pulmonary angiography in late pregnancy: a phantom study

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the leading direct cause of maternal mortality in the UK. Accurate diagnosis is important but, even though CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the recommended imaging modality for PE in the general population, there is limited guidance for pregnant patients. Knowledge of the radiation doses to both the mother and the fetus is therefore important in the justification of CTPA in this situation. Dose measurements were made on three helical CT scanners, with an anthropomorphic phantom representing the chest and abdomen in late gestation. Estimated fetal doses from CT scans of the maternal chest were in the range of 60-230 microGy. Fetal dose reduction strategies (mA modulation, shielding with a lead coat, and a 5 cm shorter scan length) were investigated. These reduced the fetal dose by 10%, 35% and 56%, respectively. Fetal doses from a scan projection radiograph (SPR) of the maternal chest were insignificant when compared with the dose from a CT scan. However, if the SPR was not stopped before the "fetus" was directly irradiated, the dose measured on one scanner was 20 microGy.     

Pediatric patient exposures from CT examinations: GE CT/T 9800 scanner

This report presents Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) values for typical CT examinations of children for a GE CT/T 9800 scanner and compares them with measured entrance skin absorbed doses of pediatric patients under clinical situations. Pediatric entrance skin absorbed doses were 1.1-2.4 rad (cGy) for chest and abdomen examinations, 2.0-3.4 rad (cGy) for pediatric head examinations, and 3.2-4.2 rad (cGy) for infant (less than or equal to 6 months) head examinations. CTDI measurements in a cylindrical Lucite head phantom predicted typical pediatric absorbed doses to within about 5% for chest and abdomen examinations and to within about 15% for head examinations, when corrections for amperage differences are taken into account.     

Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector array computed tomography protocols

PURPOSE: To determine the organ doses and total body effective dose (ED) delivered to an anthropomorphic phantom by multidetector array computed tomography (MDCT) when using standard clinical adult body imaging protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) technology was applied during the scanning of a female anthropomorphic phantom to determine 20 organ doses delivered during clinical body computed tomography (CT) imaging protocols. A 16-row MDCT scanner (LightSpeed, General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wis) was used. Effective dose was calculated as the sum of organ doses multiplied by a weighting factor determinant found in the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60. Volume CT dose index and dose length product (DLP) values were recorded at the same time for the same scan. RESULTS: Effective dose (mSv) for body MDCT imaging protocols were as follows: standard chest CT, 6.80 +/- 0.6; pulmonary embolus CT, 13.7 +/- 0.4; gated coronary CT angiography, 20.6 +/- 0.4; standard abdomen and pelvic CT, 13.3 + 1.0; renal stone CT, 4.51 + 0.45. Effective dose calculated by direct organ measurements in the phantom was 14% to 37% greater than those determined by the DLP method. CONCLUSIONS: Effective dose calculated by the DLP method underestimates ED as compared with direct organ measurements for the same CT examination. Organ doses and total body ED are higher than previously reported for MDCT clinical body imaging protocols.     

Comparative evaluation of organ and effective doses for paediatric patients with those for adults in chest and abdominal CT examinations

Patient doses in paediatric and adult CT examinations were investigated for modern multislice CT scanners by using specially constructed in-phantom dose measuring systems. The systems were composed of 32 photodiode dosemeters embedded in various tissue and organ sites within anthropomorphic phantoms representing the bodies of 6-year-old children and adults. Organ and the effective doses were evaluated from dose values measured at these sites. In chest CT examinations, organ doses for organs within the scanning area were 2-21 mGy for children and 7-26 mGy for adults. Thyroid doses for children were frequently the highest with a maximum of 21 mGy. In abdominal CT examinations, organ doses for organs within the scanning area were 3-16 mGy for children and 10-34 mGy for adults. Effective doses evaluated for children and adults were found to be proportional to the effective mAs of CT scanners, where linear coefficients were specific to the types of CT examinations and to the manufacturers of CT scanners. Effective doses in paediatric chest CT and abdominal CT examinations were lower than those in adult examinations by a factor of two or greater on average for the same CT scanners because of the lower effective mAs adopted in paediatric examinations.     

Overranging in multisection CT: quantification and relative contribution to dose--comparison of four 16-section CT scanners

PURPOSE: To quantify the number of overrange rotations and to assess their relative contribution to organ and effective doses at 16-section body computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overranging was quantified for four 16-section scanners by means of free-in-air dose measurements at different scan lengths. Overrange rotations and lengths at a certain section width were derived for all collimations and clinically used pitches by extrapolation. The effect of reconstructed section width on overranging was analyzed separately. Results were applied to clinical protocols for the chest and abdomen. Thyroid and testicular dose and effective dose were established, and relative dose contributions from overranging were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed by using Pearson correlation and paired t tests. P<.05 indicated a significant difference. RESULTS: The number of overrange rotations showed considerable differences between scanners, with a range of 1.99-4.04 at the lowest and 0.93-2.59 at the highest pitch. Number of rotations correlated negatively with pitch, while overrange length correlated positively with collimation and pitch. The effect of section width was variable. In the protocols, overrange length ranged from 3.2 to 5.8 cm for chest and from 3.2 to 5.2 cm for abdominal CT. When the contribution of overranging was not taken into account, significantly lower values for thyroid (P=.012) and testicular (P=.025) doses and effective doses for chest (P=.005) and abdominal (P=.011) CT resulted. CONCLUSION: Overranging is reconstruction-algorithm specific, and its length generally increases with collimation and pitch, while the effect of section width is variable. Overranging may lead to substantial but unnoticed exposure to radiosensitive organs.     

National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003

A review of patient doses from CT examinations in the UK for 2003 has been conducted on the basis of data received from over a quarter of all UK scanners, of which 37% had multislice capability. Questionnaires were employed to collect scan details both for the standard protocols established at each scanner for 12 common types of CT examination on adults and children, and for samples of individual patients. This information was combined with published scanner-specific CT dose index (CTDI) coefficients to estimate values of the standard dose indices CTDI(w) and CTDI(vol) for each scan sequence. Knowledge of each scan length allowed assessment of the dose-length product (DLP) for each examination, from which effective doses were then estimated. When compared with a previous UK survey for 1991, wide variations were still apparent between CT centres in the doses for standard protocols. The mean UK doses for adult patients were in general lower by up to 50% than those for 1991, although doses were slightly higher for multislice (4+) (MSCT) relative to single slice (SSCT) scanners. Values of CTDI(vol) for MSCT were broadly similar to European survey data for 2001. The third quartile values of these dose distributions have been used to derive UK national reference doses for examinations on adults (separately for SSCT and MSCT) and children as initial tools for promoting patient protection. The survey has established the PREDICT (Patient Radiation Exposure and Dose in CT) database as a sustainable national resource for monitoring dose trends in CT through the ongoing collation of further survey data.     

Assessment of a theoretical formalism for dose estimation in CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study

Dose assessment in computed tomography (CT) is challenging due to the vast variety of CT scanners and imaging protocols in use. In the present study, the accurateness of a theoretical formalism implemented in the PC program CT-EXPO for dose calculation was evaluated by means of phantom measurements. Phantom measurements were performed with four 1-slice, four 4-slice and two 16-slice spiral CT scanners. Firstly, scanner-specific _nCTDI_w values were measured and compared with the corresponding standard values used for dose calculation. Secondly, effective doses were determined for three CT scans (head, chest and pelvis) performed at each of the ten installations from readings of thermoluminescent dosimeters distributed inside an anthropomorphic Alderson phantom and compared with the corresponding dose values computed with CT-EXPO. Differences between standard and individually measured _nCTDI_w values were less than 16%. Statistical analysis yielded a highly significant correlation (P<0.001) between calculated and measured effective doses. The systematic and random uncertainty of the dose values calculated using standard _nCTDI_w values was about –9 and ±11%, respectively. The phantom measurements and model calculations were carried out for a variety of CT scanners and representative scan protocols validate the reliability of the dosimetric formalism considered—at least for patients with a standard body size and a tube voltage of 120 kV selected for the majority of CT scans performed in our study.     

CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland

This work aimed at assessing the doses delivered in Switzerland to paediatric patients during computed tomography (CT) examinations of the brain, chest and abdomen, and at establishing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for various age groups. Forms were sent to the ten centres performing CT on children, addressing the demographics, the indication and the scanning parameters: number of series, kilovoltage, tube current, rotation time, reconstruction slice thickness and pitch, volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) and dose length product (DLP). Per age group, the proposed DRLs for brain, chest and abdomen are, respectively, in terms of CTDI(vol): 20, 30, 40, 60 mGy; 5, 8, 10, 12 mGy; 7, 9, 13, 16 mGy; and in terms of DLP: 270, 420, 560, 1,000 mGy cm; 110, 200, 220, 460 mGy cm; 130, 300, 380, 500 mGy cm. An optimisation process should be initiated to reduce the spread in dose recorded in this study. A major element of this process should be the use of DRLs.     

A contribution to the establishment of diagnostic reference levels in CT

CT has become the major source of population exposure to diagnostic X-rays. CT dose index (CTDI) and dose-length product (DLP) have been proposed as the appropriate dose quantities for the establishment of diagnostic reference levels for optimizing patient exposure. Dose measurements on 27 CT scanners in Northern Greece involving six routine CT examinations have been performed in order to compare their performance with the currently proposed European reference dose values and to produce a preliminary set of data for the establishment of local diagnostic reference levels. All measurements were performed using a pencil shaped ionization chamber introduced into polymethyl methacrylate cylindrical head and body phantoms. The results revealed significant discrepancies in dose values among the CT scanners, which can be mainly attributed to variations in the examination protocols and the different kinds of scanners. Significant overdosing compared with the European reference levels has not been observed, with the exception of the routine head examination, where 47% of the scanners exceeded the corresponding CTDI(w) value. CT scans in the trunk region result in the higher effective doses, which can reach estimated maximal values of the order of 15 mSv.     

Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels in Ireland

Objective To propose Irish CT diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) by collecting radiation doses for the most commonly performed CT examinations. Methods A pilot study investigated the most frequent CT examinations. 40 CT sites were then asked to complete a survey booklet to allow the recording of CT parameters for each of 9 CT examinations during a 12-week period. Dose data [CT volume index (CTDI(vol)) and dose-length product (DLP)] on a minimum of 10 average-sized patients in each category were recorded to calculate a mean site CTDI(vol) and DLP value. The rounded 75th percentile was used to calculate a DRL for each site and the country by compiling all results. Results are compared with international DRL data. Results Data were collected for 3305 patients. 30 sites responded with data for 34 scanners, representing 54% of the national total. All equipment had multislice capability (2-128 slices). DRLs are proposed using CTDI(vol) (mGy) and DLP (mGy cm) for CT head (66/58 and 940, respectively), sinuses (16 and 210, respectively), cervical spine (19 and 420, respectively), thorax (9/11 and 390, respectively), high resolution CT (7 and 280, respectively), CT pulmonary angiography (13 and 430, respectively), multiphase abdomen (13 and 1120, respectively), routine abdomen/pelvis (12 and 600, respectively) and trunk examinations (10/12 and 850, respectively). These values are lower than current DRLs and comparable to other international studies. Wide variations in mean doses are noted across sites. Conclusions Baseline figures for Irish CT DRLs are provided on the most frequently performed CT examinations. The variations in dose between CT departments as well as between identical scanners suggest a large potential for optimisation of examinations.     

儿童CT检查中扫描参数的优化

目的 了解儿童CT检查扫描条件选择及其所致辐射剂量的相关性,以期通过适当调节mAs、扫描长度等参数,降低儿童CT检查患者受照剂量。方法 比较江苏省7家医院不同年龄组（<1岁、1~5岁、6~10岁和11~15岁）儿童头颅、胸部、腹部多排螺旋CT检查主要扫描参数的差异。选用相同的检查参数在TM160剂量模体上测量CTDI₁₀₀,计算DLP,并通过经验加权因子,估算出不同部位检查的有效剂量（E）。对mAs、扫描长度和DLP进行多元线性回归分析,比较两家典型医院由于选择扫描条件不同所导致的剂量差异。结果 儿童头颅、胸部、腹部CT检查所致患者的有效剂量均值分别为2.46、5.69、11.86 mSv,各部位检查DLP与mAs、扫描长度均呈正相关（r=0.81、0.81、0.92,P<0.05）。较高的mAs选择,致使本研究各年龄组儿童胸腹部CT检查有效剂量是德国Galanski等研究的1.2~3.0倍;B医院各年龄组腹部检查选择了较高的扫描长度,以致其所致有效剂量均高于本研究均值。结论 建议通过合理优化儿童不同部位CT检查mAs、扫描长度等扫描参数,降低受检者所受辐射风险。     

64层螺旋CT检查中患者受照剂量的研究

目的 对64层螺旋CT头部、胸部和腹部检查中患者受照剂量进行调查,确定有效剂量转换系数,为诊断方法的选取提供辐射剂量学方面的建议.方法 采用GE Lightspeed 64层螺旋CT机选取头部平扫48例、胸部平扫50例和腹部平扫45例患者,记录峰值电压(kV)、管电流(mA)、CT容积剂量指数(CTDIvol)和剂最长度乘积(DLP).采用SR 250软件计算患者有效剂量,将有效剂量除以DLP得到有效剂最转换系数.结果 头部、胸部和腹部CT平扫中患者有效剂量分别为:(3.1±0.1)、(6.9±0.1)和(8.0±0.1)mSv.有效剂量相对DLP的转换系数分别为:0.0025、0.0191和0.0166 mSv·mGy-1·cm-1.结论 建议采用CTDIvol、DLP和有效剂量监控患者受照剂量;采用有效剂量转换系数调查群体受照剂量、评估不同放射诊断的辐射风险及进行CT设备质量分析.     

CT doses in children: a multicentre study

We evaluated examination protocols used for common CT procedures of paediatric patients at different hospitals in Belgium in order to determine whether adjustments related to patient size are made in scanning parameters, and to compare patient doses with proposed reference levels. Three paediatric hospitals and one non-paediatric hospital participated in the study. Weighted CT dose-index (CTDI(w)), dose-length product (DLP) and effective dose (E) were evaluated for three patient ages (1 year, 5 years and 10 years) and three common procedures (brain, thorax and abdomen). CTDI(w) and DLP values higher than the reference levels were found for all types of evaluated examination. E ranged from 0.4 mSv to 2.3 mSv, 1.1 mSv to 6.6 mSv, and 2.3 mSv to 19.9 mSv for brain, thorax and abdomen examinations, respectively. All centres but one adapted their protocols as a function of patient size. However, no common trend in the selection of protocols was observed. Some centres divided the whole range of patient size into only two/three groups by age, while others classified the patients into six groups by weight. It was also observed that some centres used the same mAs for the total range of patient sizes and decreased the pitch factor for small children, which resulted in higher doses. This indicates the importance of careful selection of technical scan parameters. If CT parameters used for paediatric patients are not adjusted on the basis of examination type, age and/or size of the child, then some patients will be exposed to an unnecessarily high radiation dose during CT examinations.     

Radiation dose evaluation in multidetector-row CT imaging for acute stroke with an anthropomorphic phantom

This study evaluated radiation dose and dose reduction in CT imaging for acute stroke. Radiation doses in three types of CT imaging (i.e. non-contrast-enhanced CT, CT perfusion (CTP) and CT angiography (CTA)) were measured with an in-phantom dosimetry system for 4-, 16- and 64-detector CT scanners in 5 hospitals. To examine the relationship between image quality and radiation dose in CTA, image contrast-to-noise ratio was evaluated. Doses to the brain, lens, salivary glands and local skin obtained with scan protocols in routine use were: 42-71 mGy, 30-88 mGy, 3.9-7.3 mGy and 40-97 mGy in non-contrast-enhanced CT; 41-75 mGy, 9.9-10 mGy, 1.5-2.1 mGy and 107-143 mGy in CTP; and 8.2-55 mGy, 26-69 mGy, 2.0-73 mGy and 32-72 mGy in CTA. For the combination of these CT examinations, on average a patient would receive 236 mGy for the maximum local skin dose and 4.2 mSv for the effective dose evaluated by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 103. Effective doses in CTP in this study were less than those obtained with representative protocols of Western countries. Average effective doses in each CT examination were not more than 1.5 mSv. The use of reduced kV and a narrow scan range would be effective in dose reduction of CTA and CTP, and intermittent scanning would be essential in CTP. Although lens and maximum local skin doses were far less than the thresholds for deterministic effects, since radiation risks would be increased in repeated CT examinations, efforts should be devoted to dose reduction in stroke CT examinations.     

Paediatric and adult computed tomography practice and patient dose in Australia

The current practice for CT scanning of paediatric patients in Australia has been assessed through a survey sent to the site of all CT scanners licensed in New South Wales and all dedicated children's hospitals in Australia. The survey addressed demographic details, CT scanner details and scanning parameters for four imaging scenarios (brain CT, chest CT, abdomen/pelvis CT and high-resolution chest CT for three different age groups (8 weeks, 5-7 years and adult patients). The effective dose for each imaging scenario and age group was calculated and compared for 52 sites representing 53 CT scanners. For any age group and imaging scenario, there was a large spread of effective dose. For comparable CT examinations, the effective dose varied by up to 36-fold between centres. There was a clear trend for centres that frequently carry out CT scans on paediatric patients to have the lowest radiation doses. Four age group/imaging scenarios showed significantly lower effective doses for hospital-based CT than for nonhospital sites. There was also a trend for doses to be lower at dedicated paediatric centres. Effective dose was closely associated with mAs, with most centres using lower mAs for younger patients, but few centres reduced the kVp for paediatric patients. The results of the survey emphasize the need for continuing education and protocol review, particularly in paediatric CT examinations, in a complex and fast changing environment.     

Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics

PURPOSE: To determine the dose characteristics of multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) and to provide tabulated dose values and rules of thumb that assist in minimizing the radiation dose at multi-detector row CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Weighted CT dose index (CTDI100w) values were obtained from three multi-detector row CT scanners (LightSpeed; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis) for both head and body CT modes by using standard CT-dose phantoms. The CTDI100w was determined as a function of x-ray tube voltage (80, 100, 120, 140 kVp), tube current (range, 50-380 mA), tube rotation time (0.5-4.0 seconds), radiation profile width (RPW) (5, 10, 15, 20 mm), and acquisition mode (helical high-quality and high-speed modes and axial one-, two-, and four-section modes). Statistical regression was performed to characterize the relationships between CTDI100w and various technique factors. RESULTS: The CTDI100w (milligray) increased linearly with tube current: in head mode, CTDI100w = (0.391 mGy/mA +/- 0.004) x tube current (milliampere) (r2 = 0.999); in body mode, CTDI100w = (0.162 mGy/mA +/- 0.002) x tube current (milliampere) (r2 = 0.999). The CTDI100w increased linearly with rotation time: in head mode, CTDI100w = (34.7 mGy/sec +/- 0.2) x rotation time (seconds) (r2 = 1.0); in body mode, CTDI100w = (13.957 mGy/sec +/- 0.005) x rotation time (seconds) (r2 = 1.0). The relationship of normalized CTDI100w (milligrays per 100 mAs) with tube voltage followed a power law: in head mode, CTDI100w = (0.00016 mGy/100 mAs. kVp +/- 0.00007) x (tube voltage)(2.5+/-0.1) (r2 = 0.997); in body mode, CTDI100w = (0.000012 mGy/100 mAs. kVp +/- 0.000007) x (tube voltage)(2.8+/-0.1) (r2 = 0.996). In all scanning modes, CTDI100w decreased when RPW increased. CTDI100w was 10% higher in head mode and 13% lower in body mode compared with the value suggested by the manufacturer, which is displayed at the scanner console. When deposited power exceeded 24 kW, CTDI100w increased by 10% as a result of use of the large focal spot. CONCLUSION: The authors provide a set of tables of radiation dose as a function of imaging protocol to facilitate implementation of radiation dose-efficient studies.     

Population exposure to ionising radiation from CT examinations in Aosta Valley between 2001 and 2008

Recent and continuous advances in CT, such as the development of multislice CT, have promoted a rapid increase in its clinical application. Today, CT accounts for approximately 10% of the total number of medical radiographic procedures worldwide. However, the growing performance of the new CT generations have increased not only the diagnostic opportunities, but also the radiation dose to the patient. The relative contribution to the collective radiation dose is now estimated to be approximately 50%. Several papers have been published concerning the intensive use of CT and its contribution to the collective dose. However, most of the literature concerns the years 1997-2003 and the dosimetric evaluations are generally limited to the main standard protocols (chest, head and abdomen), deriving the effective dose by the simple application of the diagnostic reference levels. Only specific dosimetric analyses of single and innovative procedures have been published recently. Moreover, few data comes from Italian radiology departments. This paper aims to bridge these gaps. Firstly, it characterises in terms of measured CT dose index (CTDI) two last-generation scanners of the Radiological Department of Aosta Hospital. Secondly, it evaluates the effective dose from most of the CT examinations performed from 2001 to 2008 to compare protocols and technologies in line with the suggestions of the 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Publication 103. Finally, it estimates the collective dose to the population.