The penetrance of ductal carcinoma in situ among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a precancerous lesion of the female breast and is strongly suspected to be a precursor of invasive breast cancer (IBC). Our goal is the estimation of the age-specific and lifetime penetrances of DCIS among carriers of either a BRCA1 or BRCA2 deleterious mutation. We jointly re-analyze the SEER9 database and a previous study by Claus et al. (JAMA 293:964–969, 2005). Estimation is performed via Bayes theorem after the evaluation of the ratio of age-specific DCIS incidences, and extrapolation to the general population of the study-specific penetrance obtained from Claus et al. From the SEER9 database, we estimate the lifetime risk of DCIS to be 0.98 %, in contrast to value of 12.5 % usually reported for IBC. By extending the result in Claus et al. to the general population, we obtain a lifetime risk for carriers of a deleterious mutation of either BRCA1 or BRCA2 of 6.21 % (95 % CI 6.09–6.33 %). The increase in lifetime risk of DCIS for a BRCA mutation carrier compared to a non-carrier is therefore about six-fold. Our quantification is directly relevant to the identification and genetic counseling of BRCA mutation carriers, and emphasizes the potential importance of including information on diagnoses of DCIS in counseling of individuals who are at familial risk for breast cancer. All these factors can contribute to a more specific and targeted prevention, potentially reducing the impact of IBC among BRCA mutation carriers.     

Prevalence and penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in unselected Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 2.0%-2.5% of Ashkenazi Jewish women carry one of three founding mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, and each mutation is associated with a high lifetime risk of invasive breast cancer. We investigated the extent to which these three mutations contribute to breast cancer incidence in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. METHODS: We ascertained 457 Jewish women with prevalent cases of breast cancer who were unselected for age or family history of the disease; 412 of these women were tested for the three founder mutations (case patients). Control subjects consisted of 360 non-Jewish women with breast cancer (control patients) and 380 healthy Jewish women with no history of cancer (control subjects). RESULTS: Mutations were found in 48 (11.7%) of 412 Jewish case patients. Forty-six of 48 mutations occurred in women with early-onset breast cancer (<50 years) or a history of ovarian or early-onset breast cancer in a first-, second-, or third-degree relative. The estimated penetrance to age 70 years for breast cancer was 59.9% for the BRCA1 gene mutations and 28.3% for the BRCA2 gene mutation. Compared with Jewish control subjects, the relative risk (RR) of breast cancer for first-degree relatives of mutation carriers was 5.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.14-8. 48), but risk was also increased for relatives of noncarriers (RR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.18-2.33). The RR of prostate cancer for first-degree relatives of Jewish case patients was 3.36 (95% CI = 1. 49-7.56). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 12% of breast cancers in the Ashkenazi Jewish population are attributable to mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. Genetic testing may be useful when Jewish women with breast cancer are diagnosed before age 50 years or have a close relative with ovarian or early-onset breast cancer. An association between breast and prostate cancers was observed in our study population.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation frequency in women evaluated in a breast cancer risk evaluation clinic.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in families identified in a breast cancer risk evaluation clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-four families seeking breast cancer risk evaluation were screened for coding region mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis and DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Mutations were identified in 37 families (22.6%); 28 (17.1%) had BRCA1 mutations and nine (5.5%) had BRCA2 mutations. The Ashkenazi Jewish founder mutations 185delAG and 5382insC (BRCA1) were found in 10 families (6.1%). However, 6174delT (BRCA2) was found in only one family (0.6%) despite estimates of equal frequency in the Ashkenazi population. In contrast to other series, the average age of breast cancer diagnosis was earlier in BRCA2 mutation carriers (32.1 years) than in women with BRCA1 mutations (37.6 years, P =.028). BRCA1 mutations were detected in 20 (45.5%) of 44 families with ovarian cancer and 12 (75%) of 16 families with both breast and ovarian cancer in a single individual. Significantly fewer BRCA2 mutations (two [4.5%] of 44) were detected in families with ovarian cancer (P =.01). Eight families had male breast cancer; one had a BRCA1 mutation and three had BRCA2 mutations. CONCLUSION: BRCA1 mutations were three times more prevalent than BRCA2 mutations. Breast cancer diagnosis before 50 years of age, ovarian cancer, breast and ovarian cancer in a single individual, and male breast cancer were all significantly more common in families with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, but none of these factors distinguished between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Evidence for reduced breast cancer penetrance associated with the BRCA2 mutation 6174delT was noted.     

Collaboration of breast cancer clinic and genetic counseling division for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation family in Japan

BACKGROUND: BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations cause high breast cancer incidence rates as high as 80% Although prophylactic therapy is still controversial, several prophylactic therapies have been proposed and tried for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Prophylactic surgery, chemo-prevention and precise screening have been proposed as prophylactic therapy. All BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers need knowledge about their disease and the countermeasures that are used to protect against onset of disease. Counseling plays an important role in this regard for people with genetic diseases. Therefore, collaboration between breast cancer clinics and genetic counseling services is the most important issue in clinical practice. Our group consists of three national universities and a general hospital. In this article we describe our trial to construct a clinical system against hereditary breast cancer as an interim report for the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty familial breast cancer patients were registered in this study. The whole sequence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 were analyzed. If pathological mutations were detected, their first degree families were introduced to the counseling division at each institute when candidates visited counseling divisions. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Four cases of a deleterious mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 were detected among 20 cases. Their first degree relatives are now under consideration for visiting counseling divisions. The clinical system described in this study should play a role to protect BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers in Japan.     

Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast-ovarian families from a breast cancer risk evaluation clinic.

PURPOSE: Data from the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium suggest that the proportion of familial breast and ovarian cancers linked to BRCA1 or BRCA2 may be as high as 98% depending on the characteristics of the families, suggesting that mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 may entirely account for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. We sought to determine what proportion of families with both breast and ovarian cancers seen in a breast cancer risk evaluation clinic are accounted for by coding region germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 as compared to a linkage study group. We also evaluated what clinical parameters were predictive of mutation status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Affected women from 100 families with at least one case of breast cancer and at least one case of ovarian cancer in the same lineage were screened for germline mutations in the entire coding regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis, a polymerase chain reaction-based heteroduplex analysis, or direct sequencing. RESULTS: Unequivocal deleterious mutations were found in 55% (55 of 100) of the families studied. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 accounted for 80% and 20% of the mutations overall, respectively. Using multivariate analysis, the strongest predictors of detecting a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 in this study group were the presence of a single family member with both breast and ovarian cancer (P <.0009; odds ratio [OR], 5.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.04 to 15.76) and a young average age at breast cancer diagnosis in the family (P <.0016; OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.38). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that at least half of breast/ovarian families evaluated in a high-risk cancer evaluation clinic may have germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Whether the remaining families have mutations in noncoding regions in BRCA1, mutations in other, as-yet-unidentified, low-penetrance susceptibility genes, or represent chance clustering remains to be determined.     

Prevalence and penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based series of breast cancer cases. Anglian Breast Cancer Study Group

Estimates of the contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to breast cancer incidence in outbred populations have been based on studies that are either small or have selected for cases diagnosed at an early age. Only one of these has reported an estimate of the breast cancer risk associated with a mutation in these genes, and there is no published ovarian cancer risk estimate derived from a population-based case series. We screened a population-based series of breast cancer cases diagnosed before the age of 55 for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Pedigree information from the mutation carriers was used to estimate penetrance and the proportion of familial risk of breast cancer due to BRCA1 and BRCA2. We identified eight (0.7%) BRCA1 and 16 (1.3%) BRCA2 mutation carriers in 1220 breast cancer cases (actual sample size 1435 adjusted for 15% polymerase chain reaction failure rate). Mutation prevalence was substantially higher in cases diagnosed before 35 years-of-age and with increasing number of relatives affected with breast or ovarian cancer. However, most mutation carriers were diagnosed in the older age groups, and a minority reported a first-degree relative with breast cancer. Breast cancer penetrance by age 80 was estimated to be 48% (95% CI 7-82%) for BRCA1 mutation carriers and 74% (7-94%) for BRCA2 mutation carriers. Ovarian cancer penetrance for BRCA1 and BRCA2 combined was 22% (6-65%) by age 80. 17% of the familial risk of breast cancer was attributable to BRCA1 and BRCA2. At birth, the estimated prevalence of BRCA1 mutation carriers was 0.07% or 0.09% depending on the penetrance function used for the calculation. For BRCA2, the birth prevalence estimates were 0.14% and 0.22%. Mutations in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are rare in the population and account for a small fraction of all breast cancer in the UK. They account for less than one fifth of the familial risk of breast cancer. Eligibility criteria for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing based on family history and age of onset will identify only a small proportion of mutation carriers.     

Childhood cancer in families with and without BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations ascertained at a high-risk breast cancer clinic

BACKGROUND: Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are associated with breast cancer, ovarian cancer and other malignancies. Biallelic mutations of BRCA2 are a cause of Fanconi anemia and characteristic childhood cancers. We undertook this study to evaluate the contribution of familial BRCA mutations to childhood cancer in hereditary breast cancer families. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared the prevalence of childhood cancers in 379 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and 426 families without mutations. All families were ascertained at a high-risk breast cancer clinic. Our study included first- through fourth-degree relatives of BRCA mutation carriers and cancer-affected individuals with negative testing for BRCA mutations. The primary endpoint was any case of childhood cancer (diagnosed < age 21). RESULTS: 20 cases of childhood cancer occurred in 379 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and 35 cases of childhood cancer occurred in 426 families with negative mutation testing (p = 0.12). Nine childhood cancers occurred in 240 families with BRCA1 mutations, and 11 childhood cancers occurred in 141 families with BRCA2 mutations (p = 0.1). 13 of 18 families with childhood cancer and BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations (72%) and 13 of 31 families with childhood cancer and negative mutation testing (42%) met the Birch criteria for Li-Fraumeni like syndrome (LFL). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, heterozygous BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were not a risk factor for childhood cancer in hereditary breast cancer families. These data support the current practice of delaying BRCA mutation testing until adulthood.     

Health insurance and discrimination concerns and BRCA1/2 testing in a clinic population.

The discovery of the breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 has afforded those who seek breast and ovarian cancer risk counseling the option of genetic testing. Concerns about cost, confidentiality, and the potential for discrimination, however, may prevent some women from pursuing genetic testing. To determine the impact of these concerns on BRCA testing, we studied a cohort of 384 patients presenting de novo to a Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Evaluation Program, between January 6, 1997 and March 13, 2000. Of the 184 individuals who were themselves primary candidates for testing, 106 (58%) underwent BRCA1/2 sequencing. Of the 78 eligible patients who declined testing, 48 cited concerns about cost and insurance discrimination as their reason. On the basis of the number of positive results ascertained in the tested group, we estimate that approximately half of patients declining testing because of insurance coverage concerns would be positive for a BRCA mutation. We were unable to document any experiences of test result-based discrimination, although there were other negative insurance-related experiences. We conclude that in a high prior-risk clinic population, approximately one-quarter of patients eligible for BRCA testing may decline because of concerns about cost, confidentiality, and discrimination. Our research provides evidence that these fears may be discrepant with the actual experiences of patients in high-risk clinics.     

BRCA1和BRCA2的始祖突变

BRCA1和BRCA2的突变与乳腺癌和卵巢癌的发生密切相关。BRCA1和BRCA2的始祖突变多种多样,而且在不同民族、不同地域的人口中突变类型和频率不尽相同。在特定的人口中,始祖突变由于存在始祖效应,其发生率较高。与昂贵的全基因扫描相比,始祖突变检测更加方便、经济和易于普及,能为相关癌症的预防和治疗提供信息。     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in lymphoma patients

Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumor suppressor genes are associated with an increased risk for breast and ovarian cancers as well as other types of malignancies. The observation of a germline BRCA1 mutation in an index case with a lymphoid neoplasm in the setting of a family history of breast cancer prompted us to explore the role of BRCA germline mutations as lymphoma susceptibility alleles. A panel of 286 DNA samples from Jewish lymphoma patients was analyzed for the three most frequent BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in those of Ashkenazi Jewish heritage, and compared to a cohort of 5010 DNA samples from healthy controls. Of the 286 cases, 2 patients carried a germline BRCA mutation; both were diagnosed at an early age with an intermediate grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This data indicate that germline BRCA mutations are not associated with an increased risk for lymphoid malignancies.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2: 1994 and beyond

The discovery of the first gene associated with hereditary breast cancer, BRCA1, was anticipated to greatly increase our understanding of both hereditary and sporadic forms of breast cancer, and to lead to therapeutic and preventive breakthroughs. Much has been learned during the past decade about the genetic epidemiology of breast cancer, the ethnic distribution and clinical consequences of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, and the central role of DNA repair in breast cancer susceptibility. The ability to translate this knowledge into novel treatments, however, remains elusive.     

219例中国汉族遗传性乳腺癌患者BRCA1和BRCA2突变的研究

  目的  分析中国新疆多民族地区的高风险遗传性乳腺癌BRCA1/2基因突变位点情况。  方法  以2009年1月到2010年12月新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院收治的来自新疆地区的68例符合高风险遗传性乳腺癌标准的患者为研究对象,其中HBC 12例,HBOC 4例,E-BC 25例,BI-BC 10例,TNB 17例。通过外周静脉血提取基因组DNA,对BRCA1/2基因的全部编码序列进行扩增。用高效液相色谱分析（DHPLC）进行突变分析预筛,结果经DNA测序验证。  结果  BRCA1/2致病性突变在新疆地区高风险遗传性乳腺癌的突变率为8.8%（6/68）。其中BRCA1的突变率为4.4%（3/68）,BRCA2的突变率为4.4%（3/68）。不同民族之间BRCA1/2突变率无统计学差异。  结论  中国新疆多民族地区的高风险遗传性乳腺癌患者部分病例具有与内地汉族人群不同的BRCA基因突变谱。BRCA1 2073delA,BRCA2 6873del CTCC及BRCA2 9481del A可能是新疆遗传性乳腺癌特有的突变位点。