Efficacy of first-line systemic treatment in correlation with BRAF V600E and different KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer - a single institution retrospective analysis

Background

KRAS mutation status in codons 12 and 13 is recognized as a predictive factor for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Despite having a wild type KRAS (wt-KRAS), not all patients with wt-KRAS respond to anti-EGFR antibody treatment. Additional mechanisms of resistance may activate mutations of the other main EGFR effectors pathway. Consequently, other molecular markers in colorectal cancer are needed to be evaluated to predict the response to therapy.

Patients and methods

In this retrospective study, objective responses (OR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) were analyzed in 176 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with first-line chemotherapy in combination with monoclonal antibodies in respect of KRAS status in codons 12 and 13 and BRAF mutational status.

Results

The KRAS mutations were found in 63 patients (35.8 %), the KRAS mutation in codon 12 in 53 patients (30.1%) and the KRAS mutation in codon 13 in 10 patients (5.7%). The BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 13 of 176 patients (7.4%). In the subgroup of mCRC patients having wt-KRAS and wild type BRAF (wt-BRAF), the objective response rates were higher (OR 54.0% ,CR 14.7%, PR 39.3%) than in the patients with wt-KRAS and mt-BRAF (OR 38.5%,CR 15.4%, PR 23.1%), the difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.378). Median OS in patients with wt-KRAS wt-BRAF, and in patients with wt-KRAS mt-BRAF, was 107.4 months and 45 months, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p= 0.042). TTP in patients with wt-KRAS wt-BRAF, and in patients with wt-KRAS mt-BRAF, was 16 months and 12 months, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.558).

Conclusions

Patients with BRAF V600E mutation have statistically significantly worse prognosis than the patients with wt-BRAF and progress earlier during treatment. The definitive role of the BRAF V600E mutation as a prognostic and predictive factor for the response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies needs to be analyzed in large prospective clinical studies.     

Contemporary treatment approaches for metastatic colorectal cancer driven by BRAF V600 mutations

The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harboring BRAF V600 mutations is challenging. These tumors are often refractory to standard treatment. Therefore, the patients may exhibit rapid clinical deterioration, depriving them of the chance to receive salvage therapy. In newly diagnosed patients with good performance status, the administration of an intensive chemotherapy regimen like FOLFOXIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) along with the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab can modify this aggressive behavior of the disease and improve patient clinical outcomes. The recently published results of the BEACON (Binimetinib, Encorafenib, and Cetuximab Combined to Treat BRAF-Mutant Colorectal Cancer) study demonstrated that a combination therapy consisting of BRAF, epidermal growth factor receptor, and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors could be a useful second-or third-line alternative. This review summarizes the current treatment strategies for BRAF-mutant mCRC.     

Impact of BRAF mutation and microsatellite instability on the pattern of metastatic spread and prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND:

It is hypothesized that BRAF mutant cancers represent a discrete subset of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) defined by poorer survival. This study investigates whether BRAF mutant CRC is further defined by a distinct pattern of metastatic spread and explores the impact of BRAF mutation and microsatellite instability (MSI) on prognosis in metastatic CRC.

METHODS:

By using prospective clinical data and molecular analyses from 2 major centers (Royal Melbourne Hospital and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), patients with known BRAF mutation status were analyzed for clinical characteristics, survival, and metastatic sites.

RESULTS:

The authors identified 524 metastatic CRC patients where BRAF mutation status was known; 57 (11%) were BRAF mutant tumors. BRAF mutant tumors were significantly associated with right‐sided primary tumor, MSI, and poorer survival (median, 10.4 months vs 34.7 months, P < .001). A distinct pattern of metastatic spread was observed in BRAF mutant tumors, namely higher rates of peritoneal metastases (46% vs 24%, P = .001), distant lymph node metastases (53% vs 38%, P = .008), and lower rates of lung metastases (35% vs 49%, P = .049). In additional survival analyses, MSI tumors had significantly poorer survival compared with microsatellite stable tumors (22.1 months vs 11.1 months, P = .017), but this difference was not evident in the BRAF mutant population.

CONCLUSIONS:

The pattern of metastatic spread observed in this study further defines BRAF mutant CRC as a discrete disease subset. The authors demonstrated that, unlikely early stage disease, MSI is associated with poorer survival in metastatic CRC, although this is driven by its association with BRAF mutation. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

术前系统性炎症指标预测结直肠癌淋巴结转移的列线图模型构建

目的:探究术前系统性炎症指标对结直肠癌患者淋巴结转移的预测价值,建立并验证结直肠癌淋巴结转移的列线图模型。方法:回顾性分析2018年12月至2019年12月我院胃肠外科初诊行手术治疗的结直肠癌患者临床资料,按术后病理结果分为淋巴结转移组与非淋巴结转移组,比较两组术前各炎症指标差异。采用单因素分析和多因素Logistic回归分析方法分析结直肠癌淋巴结转移的影响因素,应用R软件构建预测结直肠癌淋巴结转移的列线图模型,并进行内部验证。结果:共174例结直肠癌患者纳入本研究中,其中男性98例,女性76例,年龄(59.2±10.2)岁,术后病理证实72例伴淋巴结转移。淋巴结转移组患者术前中性粒细胞、血小板、纤维蛋白原、C-反应蛋白、中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比(NLR)、血小板淋巴细胞比(PLR)、淋巴细胞单核细胞比(LMR)、纤维蛋白原白蛋白比(FAR)、C-反应蛋白白蛋白比(CAR)显著高于非淋巴结转移组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);单因素分析显示,年龄、NLR、PLR、LMR、FAR、CAR与结直肠癌患者淋巴结转移有关(P均<0.05);多因素Logistic回归分析显示,年龄、...     

Role of NRAS mutations as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic colorectal cancer

NRAS mutations occur in 3–5% of colorectal cancer. Differently from KRAS and BRAF mutations, the role of NRAS mutations as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been investigated to a lesser extent. A retrospective series suggested the role of NRAS mutations as predictors of resistance to anti‐EGFR monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) in chemo‐refractory patients with mCRC. In our study, KRAS codons 12, 13, 61 and BRAF codon 600 mutational status were evaluated in mCRCs referred to our Institution from 2009 to 2012. NRAS codons 12, 13 and 61 mutational status was analyzed in KRAS/BRAF wt patients. We collected pathological and clinical features in the overall population and outcome data in a subset of NRAS mutated chemo‐refractory patients treated with anti‐EGFR MoAbs in advanced lines. NRAS was mutated in 47/786 (6%) mCRCs. NRAS and KRAS mutated tumors did not show significant differences in terms of clinical and pathological characteristics, except for a lower prevalence of mucinous histology (p = 0.012) and lung metastases (p = 0.012) among NRAS mutated tumors. In the uni‐ and multivariate model, NRAS mutations were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) compared to all wt patients (median OS 25.6 vs 42.7 months; univ: HR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.39–3.86, p = 0.0013; multiv: HR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.1.3–2.72, p = 0.013). None of the chemo‐refractory NRAS mutated patients evaluable for response to anti‐EGFRs achieved response. In conclusion, NRAS mutations have a relevant incidence in patients with mCRC and showed an association with specific clinical and pathological features. NRAS mutations affect mCRC patients' prognosis and predict lack of response to anti‐EGFRs.     

Targeting BRAF in metastatic colorectal cancer: Maximizing molecular approaches

Oncogenic mutations in B-type Raf kinase (BRAF) occur in 7–10% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC). Despite recent improvements in survival in the general population of patients with mCRC, patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC continue to have poor response to most systemic therapies, and prognosis remains poor. There is a substantial unmet need for novel therapeutic strategies to treat patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC. This review outlines the epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis, prognosis, and mechanisms of treatment resistance of BRAF-mutated CRC. Additionally, this review highlights novel therapeutic strategies aimed at enhancing response and improving outcomes.     

Systematic review of pharmacogenetic testing for predicting clinical benefit to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

Pharmacogenetic testing can help identify patients with metastatic colorectal cancer more likely to respond to anti-EGFR therapy. We systematically reviewed the benefits and harms of EGFR-related pharmacogenetic testing of molecular targets downstream to KRAS in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. We searched five electronic databases from January 2000 through November 2010, and conducted separate grey literature and conference abstracts searches. Two reviewers independently assessed all articles for relevance and quality. We identified 27 studies, primarily fair- to marginal-quality, small retrospective, and single-arm cohort studies with significant overlap in patient populations. We identified seven studies that studied BRAF in independent patient populations, one that studied NRAS, four that studied PIK3CA, eight that studied PTEN expression, and five that studied AKT expression. The best evidence for BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA comes from the largest retrospective study (n=649) of chemorefractory patients from seven European countries. In this study, BRAF mutation was present in 6.5% of KRAS wild-type tumors. Only 8.3% of persons with BRAF mutations, compared to 38% of persons without BRAF mutations (p=0.0012), responded to chemotherapy with cetuximab. Clinical sensitivity and the false positive fraction (1- specificity) were estimated at 9.8% (95% CI 6.3, 14.5) and 1.6% (95% CI 0.2, 5.6), respectively. BRAF mutation was also associated with worse median progression-free survival (absolute difference 18 weeks, p<0.0001), and overall survival (absolute difference 28 weeks, p<0.0001). In the only study comparing outcomes in persons who did (n=227) and did not (n=332) receive cetuximab with combination chemotherapy, those with BRAF mutation had worse survival outcomes regardless of whether or not they received cetuximab. Although NRAS and PIK3CA exon 20 mutations were also associated with worse outcomes compared to persons without these mutations, evidence is based on a small number of identified mutations. Evidence for protein expression of PTEN and AKT is more sparse and limited by variable methods for assessing protein expression. Low-quality evidence addressing clinical validity of pharmacogenetic testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients suggests that BRAF mutations are associated with poorer treatment response and survival outcomes, although this association may be independent of treatment with EGFR inhibitors.     

New therapeutic strategies for BRAF mutant colorectal cancers

Oncogenic BRAF mutations are found in ~10% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) and predict poor prognosis. Although BRAF inhibitors have demonstrated striking efficacy in BRAF mutant melanomas, BRAF inhibitor monotherapy is ineffective in BRAF mutant CRC. Over the past few years, studies have begun to define the molecular mechanisms underlying the relative resistance of BRAF mutant CRC to BRAF inhibitors, leading to the development of novel therapeutic strategies that are showing promising clinical activity in initial clinical trials. Our current understanding of the mechanisms of BRAF inhibitor resistance in BRAF mutant CRC and the therapeutic approaches currently in clinical trials for BRAF mutant CRC are reviewed herein.     

Cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer

Management of metastatic colorectal cancer has evolved in the last 10 years, with the availability of targeted therapies resulting in improvement in quality of life and overall survival. Cetuximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds to the EGF receptor, and the net effects are inhibition of tumor growth, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis. Cetuximab binding to the EGF receptor is also known to augment the effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Only tumors expressing wild-type KRAS respond to cetuximab and improvements in progression-free survival and overall survival are seen, whereas patients with mutant KRAS are considered to be resistant. Cetuximab is currently available worldwide for use as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in first-, second- or third-line settings in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with wild-type KRAS.     

An internally and externally validated nomogram for predicting the risk of irinotecan-induced severe neutropenia in advanced colorectal cancer patients

Background:

In Asians, the risk of irinotecan-induced severe toxicities is related in part to UGT1A1*6 (UGT, UDP glucuronosyltransferase) and UGT1A1*28, variant alleles that reduce the elimination of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. We prospectively studied the relation between the UGT1A1 genotype and the safety of irinotecan-based regimens in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer, and then constructed a nomogram for predicting the risk of severe neutropenia in the first treatment cycle.

Methods:

Safety data were obtained from 1312 patients monitored during the first 3 cycles of irinotecan-based regimen in a prospective observational study. In development of the nomogram, multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to test the associations of candidate factors to severe neutropenia in the first cycle. The final nomogram based on the results of multivariable analysis was constructed and validated internally using a bootstrapping technique and externally in an independent data set (n=350).

Results:

The UGT1A1 genotype was confirmed to be associated with increased risks of irinotecan-induced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and diarrhoea. The final nomogram included type of regimen, administered dose of irinotecan, gender, age, UGT1A1 genotype, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, pre-treatment absolute neutrophil count, and total bilirubin level. The model was validated both internally (bootstrap-adjusted concordance index, 0.69) and externally (concordance index, 0.70).

Conclusions:

Our nomogram can be used before treatment to accurately predict the probability of irinotecan-induced severe neutropenia in the first cycle of therapy. Additional studies should evaluate the effect of nomogram-guided dosing on efficacy in patients receiving irinotecan.     

Changes in mutational status during third‐line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer—Results of consecutive measurement of cell free DNA,KRAS and BRAF in the plasma

KRAS and BRAF mutations are responsible for primary resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) MoAbs in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but it is unknown what causes wildtype (wt) patients to develop resistance during treatment. We measured circulating free DNA (cfDNA), KRAS and BRAF in plasma and report the changes during third line treatment with cetuximab and irinotecan. One‐hundred‐and‐eight patients received irinotecan 350 mg/m² q3w and weekly cetuximab (250 mg/m²) until progression (RECIST) or unacceptable toxicity. cfDNA and number of mutated KRAS/BRAF alleles in plasma at baseline and before each cycle was analyzed by an in‐house qPCR. cfDNA and pKRAS levels decreased from baseline to cycle three and increased at time of progression (p = 0.008). The decrease was larger in responding patients than in non‐responding (p < 0.05). Two patients with primary mutant disease had different types of mutations detected in the plasma, including synchronous KRAS and BRAF. Twelve patients had a primary KRAS mutant tumor, but wild‐type disease according to baseline plasma analysis, eight of these obtained stabilization of disease. In five patients with primary wt disease a mutation appeared in plasma before radiological evidence of progression. Loss of mutations may explain observed benefit of treatment in primary mutant disease, whereas appearance of mutations during therapy may be responsible for acquired resistance in primary wt disease. Benefit from EGFR MoAbs may be influenced by the quantitative level of mutational alleles rather than by mutational status alone, and plasma levels of cfDNA, KRAS and BRAF could be used to monitor patients during treatment.     

Metabolic factors and the risk of colorectal cancer by KRAS and BRAF mutation status

Factors related to energy metabolism and the metabolic syndrome, such as higher body mass index (BMI), blood glucose, or blood lipids, and blood pressure, are associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, CRC is a heterogeneous disease, developing through distinct pathways with differences in molecular characteristics and prognosis, and possibly also in risk factors. For subtypes defined by KRAS and BRAF mutation status, BMI is the only metabolic factor previously studied, with inconsistent findings. We investigated whether associations between BMI, blood glucose, blood lipids, and blood pressure and CRC risk differed by tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status in 117,687 participants from two population-based cohorts within the Northern Sweden Health and Disease Study (NSHDS). Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall CRC and CRC subtypes by metabolic factors were estimated with Cox proportional hazards regression, using multiple imputation to handle missing exposure and tumor data. During a median follow-up of 15.6 years, we acquired 1,250 prospective CRC cases, of which 766 cases had complete baseline and molecular tumor data. Consistent with previous evidence, higher BMI, total cholesterol, triglyceride levels, and blood pressure were associated with an increased risk of overall CRC (HRs per 1 standard deviation increase: 1.07 to 1.12). These associations were similar regardless of CRC subtype by KRAS and BRAF mutation status (all p_{heterogeneity} > 0.05). The same was true for subtypes based on microsatellite instability status. Poor metabolic health may therefore be a universal mechanism for colorectal cancer, acting across multiple developmental pathways.     

Historical perspective: Two decades of progress in treating metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States. While screening methods strive to improve rates of early stage detection, 25% of patients have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, with the most common sites being the liver, lung, and peritoneum. While once perceived as hopeless, the last two decades have seen substantial strides in the medical, surgical, and regional therapies to treat metastatic disease offering significant improvements in survival.     

Nonresectional regional therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver

The liver is the second leading site of colorectal cancer metastases, following the lymph nodes. Although metastatic resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases has been shown to improve survival, many patients cannot undergo surgery. Several nonsurgical therapies are available in these situations, however high-quality evidence comparing the effectiveness of these therapies is sparse. Here, we review the currently available evidence in support of nonresectional regional therapies for colorectal metastases to the liver.     

Clinical significance of BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer

BRAF mutations, present in 5 to 10% of colorectal cancers, have a proved oncogenic effect which is linked to their implication in the RAS/MAPK intracellular signalling pathway and they occurred at early stage of colorectal carcinogenesis. Many studies have therefore assessed their clinical significance as diagnostic and prognostic marker in colorectal cancers. More recently, their location downstream to EGFR and KRAS in the RAS/MAPK pathway have led to their evaluation as predictive marker of resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. This article aims to review the role of BRAF mutations in the diagnostic strategy of Lynch syndrome, their prognostic value in colorectal cancers and their potential value as predictive marker of resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies.     

KRAS and BRAF mutation status in circulating colorectal tumor cells and their correlation with primary and metastatic tumor tissue

Although anti‐EGFR therapy has established efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer, only 10‐20% of unselected patients respond. This is partly due to KRAS and BRAF mutations, which are currently assessed in the primary tumor. To improve patient selection, assessing mutation status in circulating tumor cells (CTCs), which possibly better represent metastases than the primary tumor, could be advantageous. We investigated the feasibility of KRAS and BRAF mutation detection in colorectal CTCs by comparing three sensitive methods and compared mutation status in matching primary tumor, liver metastasis and CTCs. CTCs were isolated from blood drawn from 49 patients before liver resection using CellSearch?. DNA and RNA was isolated from primary tumors, metastases and CTCs. Mutations were assessed by co‐amplification at lower denaturation temperature‐PCR (Transgenomic?), real‐time PCR (EntroGen?) and nested Allele‐Specific Blocker (ASB‐)PCR and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. In 43 of the 49 patients, tissue RNA and DNA was of sufficient quantity and quality. In these 43 patients, discordance between primary and metastatic tumor was 23% for KRAS and 7% for BRAF mutations. RNA and DNA from CTCs was available from 42 of the 43 patients, in which ASB‐PCR was able to detect the most mutations. Inconclusive results in patients with low CTC counts limited the interpretation of discrepancies between tissue and CTCs. Determination of KRAS and BRAF mutations in CTCs is challenging but feasible. Of the tested methods, nested ASB‐PCR, enabling detection of KRAS and BRAF mutations in patients with as little as two CTCs, seems to be superior.     

169例国人结直肠癌患者BRAF基因的突变状态分析

目的 探讨国人结直肠癌患者鼠类肉瘤病毒癌基因同源物B1（BRAF）基因的突变状态,以期能为针对表皮生长因子受体（EGFR）的靶向治疗提供指导。方法 采用PCR测序法检测169例结直肠癌组织BRAF基因的突变情况。结果 在169例结直肠癌组织中,BRAF基因在第600位密码子（V600E）发生突变,突变频率为5.3％。BRAF基因在84例男性结直肠癌患者中的突变频率为7.1％,在85例女性患者中为3.5％,差异无统计学意义（P=0.329）。在17例结直肠癌年轻患者（25～44岁）中未检测到BRAF基因突变,在67例中年患者（45～59岁）中BRAF基因的突变频率为3.0％,在85例老年患者（60～90岁）中为8.2％,三者之间差异无统计学意义（P=0.211）。结论 BRAF基因的突变频率与结直肠癌患者的性别和年龄无关。     

2021年晚期结直肠癌治疗研究进展

结直肠癌是全球发病率第三的恶性肿瘤.目前晚期结直肠癌的治疗以化疗为基石.2021年美国临床肿瘤学会(American Society of Clinical Oncology,ASCO)及欧洲肿瘤内科学(European Society of Medical Oncology,ESMO)公布了多项晚期结直肠癌免疫及靶向...     

晚期结直肠癌内科治疗进展

晚期转移性结直肠癌的5年生存率低于10％。5-FU／LV方案治疗的中位生存期大约12个月。最近化疗方案的更新延长了患者的中位生存期。研究发现奥沙利铂、伊立替康联合5-FU／LV或者卡培他滨等化疗方案使中位生存期延长到20个月。奥沙利铂，伊立替康联合5-FU／LV比传统的单药5-FU／LV使生活质量改善时间延长。目前转移性结直肠癌标准的一线治疗方案为FOLFOX和FOLFIRI。正在进行的研究关注新的分子靶向药物（molecular targeted therapy）联合化疗治疗转移性结直肠癌，且部分试验取得了较好的疗效。本文将对5-FU、新一代化疗药物以及分子靶向药物在转移性结肠癌治疗的演进及新进展作一综述。