Prognostic value of computed tomography derived fractional flow reserve for predicting cardiac events and mortality in kidney transplant candidates

BackgroundCardiac screening using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in kidney transplant candidates before transplantation yields both diagnostic and prognostic information. Whether CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) analysis provides prognostic information is unknown.This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of FFR_CT for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality in kidney transplant candidates.MethodsAmong 553 consecutive kidney transplant candidates, 340 CCTA scans (61%) were evaluated with FFR_CT analysis. Patients were categorized into groups based on lowest distal FFR_CT; normal >0.80, intermediate 0.80–0.76, and low ≤0.75. In patients with ≥50% stenosis, a lesion-specific FFR_CT was defined as; normal >0.80 and abnormal ≤0.80.The primary endpoint was MACE (cardiac death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction or revascularization). The secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality.ResultsMedian follow-up was 3.3 years [2.0–5.1]. MACE occurred in 28 patients (8.2%), 29 patients (8.5%) died.When adjusting for risk factors and transplantation during follow-up, MACE occurred more frequently in patients with distal FFR_CT ≤0.75 compared to patients with distal FFR_CT >0.80: Hazard Ratio (HR): 3.8 (95%CI: 1.5–9.7), p ?< ?0.01.In the lesion-specific analysis with <50% stenosis as reference, patients with lesion-specific FFR_CT >0.80 had a HR for MACE of 1.5 (95%CI: 0.4–4.8), p ?= ?0.55 while patients with lesion-specific FFR_CT ≤0.80 had a HR of 6.0 (95%CI: 2.5–14.4), p ?< ?0.01.Abnormal FFR_CT values were not associated with increased mortality.ConclusionIn kidney transplant candidates, abnormal FFR_CT values were associated with increased MACE but not mortality. Use of FFR_CT may improve cardiac evaluation prior to transplantation.     

The clinical utility of FFRCT stratified by age

BackgroundCT coronary angiography (CTA) with Fractional Flow Reserve as determined by CT (FFR_CT) is a safe alternative to invasive coronary angiography. A negative FFR_CT has been shown to have low cardiac event rates compared to those with a positive FFR_CT. However, the clinical utility of FFR_CT according to age is not known.MethodsPatients’ in the ADVANCE (Assessing Diagnostic Value of Non-invasive FFRCT in Coronary Care) registry, were stratified into those ≥65 or <65 years of age. The impact of FFR_CT on clinical decision-making, as assessed by patient age, was determined by evaluating patient management using CTA results alone, followed by site investigators submitting a report on the treatment plan based upon the newly provided FFR_CT data. Outcomes at 1-year post CTA were assessed, including major adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality or unplanned hospitalization for ACS leading to revascularisation) and total revascularisation. Positive FFR_CT was deemed to be ?≤ ?0.8.ResultsFFR_CT was calculated in 1849 (40.6%) subjects aged <65 and 2704 (59.4%) ?≥ ?65 years of age. Subjects ≥65 years were more likely to have anatomic obstructive disease on CTA (≥50% stenosis), compared to those aged <65 (69.7% and 73.2% respectively, p ?= ?0.008). There was a similar graded increase in recommended and actual revascularisation with either CABG or PCI, with declining FFR_CT strata for subjects above and below the age of 65. MACE and revascularisation rates were not significantly different for those ?≥ ?or <65, regardless of FFR_CT positivity or stenosis severity <50% or ≥50%. With a negative FFR_CT result, and anatomical stenosis ≥50%, those ?≥ ?and <65 years of age, had similar rates of MACE (0.2% for both, p ?= ?0.1) and revascularisation (8.7% and 10.4% respectively p ?= ?0.4).Logistic regression analysis, with age as a continuous variable, and adjustment for Diamond Forrester Risk, baseline FFR_CT and treatment (CABG, PCI, medical therapy), indicated a statistically significant, but small increase in the odds of a MACE event with increasing age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.006–1.08, p ?= ?0.02). Amongst patients with a FFR_CT > 0.80, there was no effect of age on the odds of revascularisation.ConclusionThe findings of this study point to a low risk of MACE events or need for revascularisation in those aged ?≥ ?or <65 with a FFR_CT>0.80, despite the higher incidence of anatomic obstructive CAD in those ≥65 years. The findings show the clinical usefulness and outcomes of FFR_CT are largely constant regardless of age.     

Temporal changes in FFRCT-Guided Management of Coronary Artery Disease – Lessons from the ADVANCE Registry

BackgroundThe ADVANCE registry is a large prospective study of outcomes and resource utilization in patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and CT-based fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT). As experience with new technologies and practices develops over time, we investigated temporal changes in the use of FFR_CT within the ADVANCE registry.Methods5083 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) on CCTA were prospectively enrolled in the ADVANCE registry and were divided into 3 equally sized cohorts based on the temporal order of enrollment per site. Demographics, CCTA and FFR_CT findings, and clinical outcomes through 1-year follow-up, were recorded and compared between tertiles.ResultsThe number of patients with a ≥70% stenosis on CCTA was similar over time (33.6%, 30.9%, and 33.8% for cohort 1–3). The rate of positive FFR_CT ≤0.80 was higher for cohorts 2 (67.3%) and 3 (74.6%) than for cohort 1 (57.1%, p < 0.001). Invasive FFR rates decreased from 25.8% to 22.4% between cohort 1 and 3 (p = 0.023). Moreover, patients with a FFR_CT ≤0.80 were less frequently referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) (from 62.9% to 52.9%, p < 0.001), and underwent fewer revascularizations between cohort 1 and 3 (from 41.9% to 32.0%, p < 0.001). The prevalence of major events was low (1.2%) and similar between cohorts.ConclusionsGrowing experience with FFR_CT improved the likelihood of identifying hemodynamically significant CAD and safely reduced the need for ICA and revascularization in patients with anatomically significant disease even in the instance of an abnormal FFR_CT.     

Importance of measurement site on assessment of lesion-specific ischemia and diagnostic performance by coronary computed tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve

BackgroundValues of fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) decline from the ostium to the terminal vessel, irrespective of stenosis severity. The purpose of this study is to determine if the site of measurement of FFR_CT impacts assessment of ischemia and its diagnostic performance relative to invasive FFR (FFR_INV).Methods1484 patients underwent FFR_CT; 1910 vessels were stratified by stenosis severity (normal; <25%, 25–50%, 50–70%, and >70% stenosis). The rates of positive FFR_CT (≤0.8) were determined by measuring FFR_CT from the terminal vessel and from distal-to-the-lesion. Reclassification rates from positive to negative FFR_CT were calculated. Diagnostic performance of FFR_CT relative to FFR_INV was evaluated in 182 vessels using linear regression, Bland Altman analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.ResultsPositive FFR_CT was identified in 24.9% of vessels using terminal vessel FFR_CT and 10.1% using FFR_CT distal-to-the-lesion (p ?< ?0.001). FFR_CT obtained distal-to-the-lesion resulted in reclassification of 59.6% of positive terminal FFR_CT to negative FFR_CT. Relative to FFR_INV, there were improvements in specificity (50% to 86%, p ?< ?0.001), diagnostic accuracy (65% to 88%, p ?< ?0.001), positive predictive value (50% to 78%, p ?< ?0.001), and area-under-the-curve (AUC, 0.83 to 0.91, p ?< ?0.001) when FFR_CT was measured distal-to-the-lesion.ConclusionFFR_CT values from the terminal vessel should not be used to assess lesion-specific ischemia due to high rates of false positive results. FFR_CT measured distal-to-the-lesion improves the diagnostic performance of FFR_CT relative to FFR_INV, ensures that FFR_CT values are due to lesion-specific ischemia, and could reduce the rate of unnecessary invasive procedures.     

Sex differences in computed tomography angiography-derived coronary plaque burden in relation to invasive fractional flow reserve

BackgroundDistinct sex-related differences exist in coronary artery plaque burden and distribution. We aimed to explore sex differences in quantitative plaque burden by coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in relation to ischemia by invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR).MethodsThis post-hoc analysis of the PACIFIC trial included 581 vessels in 203 patients (mean age 58.1 ​± ​8.7 years, 63.5% male) who underwent CCTA and per-vessel invasive FFR. Quantitative assessment of total, calcified, non-calcified, and low-density non-calcified plaque burden were performed using semiautomated software. Significant ischemia was defined as invasive FFR ≤0.8.ResultsThe per-vessel frequency of ischemia was higher in men than women (33.5% vs. 7.5%, p ​< ​0.001). Women had a smaller burden of all plaque subtypes (all p ​< ​0.01). There was no sex difference on total, calcified, or non-calcified plaque burdens in vessels with ischemia; only low-density non-calcified plaque burden was significantly lower in women (beta: -0.183, p ​= ​0.035). The burdens of all plaque subtypes were independently associated with ischemia in both men and women (For total plaque burden (5% increase): Men, OR: 1.15, 95%CI: 1.06–1.24, p ​= ​0.001; Women, OR: 1.96, 95%CI: 1.11–3.46, p ​= ​0.02). No significant interaction existed between sex and total plaque burden for predicting ischemia (interaction p ​= ​0.108). The addition of quantitative plaque burdens to stenosis severity and adverse plaque characteristics improved the discrimination of ischemia in both men and women.ConclusionsIn symptomatic patients with suspected CAD, women have a lower CCTA-derived burden of all plaque subtypes compared to men. Quantitative plaque burden provides independent and incremental predictive value for ischemia, irrespective of sex.     

Pericoronary adipose tissue CT attenuation and its association with serum levels of atherosclerosis-relevant inflammatory mediators,coronary calcification and major adverse cardiac events

BackgroundIncreased attenuation of pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) around the right coronary artery (RCA) derived from coronary CTA might detect coronary inflammation. We investigated a potential association between RCA PCAT attenuation and serum levels of atherosclerosis-relevant cytokines and MACE (coronary revascularization, myocardial infarction and/or cardiac death).MethodsBlood samples of 293 clinically stable individuals (59.0 ​± ​9.8 years, 69% males) were analyzed for atherosclerosis-relevant cytokines including interleukin (IL)-2, IL- 4, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, TNF-a, IP-10, CRP, MCP-1, MIP-1a, Eotaxin and GM-CSF. Subjects also underwent coronary calcium scoring (CCS) followed by CTA. PCAT CT attenuation was measured around the RCA using semi-automated software. Increased RCA PCAT attenuation was defined as PCAT attenuation above the 75th percentile (>−73.5 HU). To assess MACE, 232 individuals were followed for a mean duration of 9.6 ​± ​2.1 years.ResultsIn patients with increased RCA PCAT attenuation the serum levels of MCP-1 were increased (p ​< ​0.01), whereas levels of anti-inflammatory mediators IL-4 and -13 were significantly reduced (each p ​< ​0.05). Adipocytokine MCP-1 (r ​= ​0.23, p ​< ​0.01) and pro-inflammatory mediator IL-7 (r ​= ​0.12, p ​= ​0.04) showed a mild positive correlation with RCA PCAT attenuation, whereas anti-inflammatory mediators Il-4, -10 and -13 correlated inversely (each r < −0.12, each p ​< ​0.05). 40/232 patients experienced MACE during follow-up. In multivariable Cox regression analysis increased RCA PCAT attenuation was shown to be an independent predictor of MACE (HR 2.01, p ​= ​0.044).ConclusionsIncreased RCA PCAT CT attenuation shows a weak association with serum levels of selected atherosclerosis-relevant inflammatory biomarkers. Increased RCA PCAT attenuation is an independent predictor of MACE and may potentially guide future prevention strategies in stable patients.     

Trans-lesional fractional flow reserve gradient as derived from coronary CT improves patient management: ADVANCE registry

BackgroundThe role of change in fractional flow reserve derived from CT (FFR_CT) across coronary stenoses (ΔFFR_CT) in guiding downstream testing in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is unknown.ObjectivesTo investigate the incremental value of ΔFFR_CT in predicting early revascularization and improving efficiency of catheter laboratory utilization.MaterialsPatients with CAD on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) were enrolled in an international multicenter registry. Stenosis severity was assessed as per CAD-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS), and lesion-specific FFR_CT was measured 2 ?cm distal to stenosis. ΔFFR_CT was manually measured as the difference of FFR_CT across visible stenosis.ResultsOf 4730 patients (66 ?± ?10 years; 34% female), 42.7% underwent ICA and 24.7% underwent early revascularization. ΔFFR_CT remained an independent predictor for early revascularization (odds ratio per 0.05 increase [95% confidence interval], 1.31 [1.26–1.35]; p ?< ?0.001) after adjusting for risk factors, stenosis features, and lesion-specific FFR_CT. Among the 3 models (model 1: risk factors ?+ ?stenosis type and location ?+ ?CAD-RADS; model 2: model 1 ?+ ?FFR_CT; model 3: model 2 ?+ ?ΔFFR_CT), model 3 improved discrimination compared to model 2 (area under the curve, 0.87 [0.86–0.88] vs 0.85 [0.84–0.86]; p ?< ?0.001), with the greatest incremental value for FFR_CT 0.71–0.80. ΔFFR_CT of 0.13 was the optimal cut-off as determined by the Youden index. In patients with CAD-RADS ≥3 and lesion-specific FFR_CT ≤0.8, a diagnostic strategy incorporating ΔFFR_CT >0.13, would potentially reduce ICA by 32.2% (1638–1110, p ?< ?0.001) and improve the revascularization to ICA ratio from 65.2% to 73.1%.ConclusionsΔFFR_CT improves the discrimination of patients who underwent early revascularization compared to a standard diagnostic strategy of CCTA with FFR_CT, particularly for those with FFR_CT 0.71–0.80. ΔFFR_CT has the potential to aid decision-making for ICA referral and improve efficiency of catheter laboratory utilization.     

Early outcomes following integration of computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography service in an established cardiology practice in disease management

BackgroundComputed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) is an established modality for the diagnosis and assessment of cardiovascular disease. However, price and space pressure have mostly necessitated outsourcing CTCA to external radiology providers. Advara HeartCare has recently integrated CT services within local clinical networks across Australia. This study examined the benefits of the presence (integrated) or absence (pre-integrated) of this “in-house” CTCA service in real-world clinical practice.MethodsDe-identified patient data from electronic medical records were used to create an Advara HeartCare CTCA database. Data analysis included clinical history, demographics, CTCA procedure, and 30-day outcomes post-CTCA from two age-matched cohorts: integrated (n ​= ​495) and pre-integrated (n ​= ​456).ResultsData capture was more comprehensive and standardised across the integrated cohort. There was a 21% increase in referrals for CTCA from cardiologists observed for the integration cohort vs. pre-integration [n ​= ​332 (72.8%) pre-integration vs. n ​= ​465 (93.9%) post-integration, p ​< ​0.0001] with a parallel increase in diagnostic assessments including blood tests [n ​= ​209 (45.8%) vs. n ​= ​387 (78.1%), respectively, p ​< ​0.0001]. The integrated cohort received lower total dose length product [Median 212 (interquartile range 136–418) mGy1cm vs. 244 (141.5, 339.3) mGy1cm, p ​= ​0.004] during the CTCA procedure. 30-days after CTCA scan, there was a significantly higher use of lipid-lowering therapies in the integrated cohort [n ​= ​133 (50.5%) vs. n ​= ​179 (60.6%), p ​= ​0.04], along with a significant decrease in the number of stress echocardiograms performed [n ​= ​14 (10.6%) vs. n ​= ​5 (11.6%), p ​= ​0.01].ConclusionIntegrated CTCA has salient benefits in patient management, including increased pathology tests, statin usage, and decreased post-CTCA stress echocardiography utilisation. Our ongoing work will examine the effect of integration on cardiovascular outcomes.     

Optimized interpretation of fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography: Comparison of three interpretation methods

BackgroundAn optimal system for interpreting fractional flow reserve (FFR) values derived from CT (FFRCT) is lacking. We sought to evaluate performance of three FFR_CT measurements in detecting ischemia by comparing them with invasive FFR.MethodsFor 73 vessels in 50 patients who underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and FFR_CT analysis followed by invasive FFR, the greatest diameter stenosis on CCTA, FFR_CT difference between distal and proximal to the stenosis (ΔFFR_CT), FFR_CT 2 cm distal to the stenosis (lesion-specific FFR_CT), and the lowest FFR_CT in distal vessel tip were calculated. Significant obstruction (≥50% diameter stenosis) and ischemia (lesion-specific FFR_CT ≤0.80, the lowest FFR_CT ≤0.80, or ΔFFR_CT ≥0.12 based on the greatest Youden index) were compared with invasive FFR (≤0.80).ResultsForty (55%) vessels demonstrated ischemia during invasive FFR. On multivariable generalized estimating equations, ΔFFR_CT (odds ratio [OR] 10.2, p < 0.01) remained a predictor of ischemia over CCTA (OR 2.9), lesion-specific FFR_CT (OR 3.1), and the lowest FFR_CT (OR 0.9) (p > 0.05 for all). Area under the curve (AUC) of ΔFFR_CT (0.86) was higher than CCTA (0.66), lesion-specific FFR_CT (0.71), and the lowest FFR_CT (0.65) (p < 0.01 for all). Addition of each FFR_CT measure to CCTA showed improvement of AUC and significant net reclassification improvement (NRI): ΔFFR_CT (AUC 0.84, NRI 1.24); lesion-specific FFR_CT (AUC 0.77, NRI 0.83); and the lowest FFR_CT (AUC 0.76, NRI 0.59) (p < 0.01 for all).ConclusionsCompared with diameter stenosis, ΔFFR_CT, lesion-specific FFR_CT, and the lowest FFR_CT improved ischemia discrimination and reclassification, with ΔFFR_CT being superior in identifying and discriminating ischemia.     

Diagnostic value of comprehensive on-site and off-site coronary CT angiography for identifying hemodynamically obstructive coronary artery disease

BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of comprehensive on-site coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) using stenosis and plaque measures and subtended myocardial mass (V_sub) for fractional flow reserve (FFR) defined hemodynamically obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Additionally, the incremental diagnostic value of off-site CT-derived FFR (FFR_CT) was assessed.MethodsProspectively enrolled patients underwent CCTA followed by invasive FFR interrogation of all major coronary arteries. Vessels with ≥30% stenosis were included for analysis. On-site CCTA assessment included qualitative and quantitative stenosis (visual grading and minimal lumen area, MLA) and plaque measures (characteristics and volumes), and V_sub. Diagnostic value of comprehensive on-site CCTA assessment was tested by comparing area under the curves (AUC). In vessels with available FFR_CT, the incremental value of off-site FFR_CT was tested.ResultsIn 236 vessels (132 patients), MLA, positive remodeling, non-calcified plaque volume, and V_sub were independent on-site CCTA predictors for hemodynamically obstructive CAD (p < 0.05 for all). V_sub/MLA² outperformed all these on-site CCTA parameters (AUC = 0.85) and V_sub was incremental to all other CCTA predictors (p = 0.02). In subgroup analysis (n = 194 vessels), diagnostic performance of FFR_CT and V_sub/MLA² was similar (AUC 0.89 and 0.85 respectively, p = 0.25). Furthermore, diagnostic performance significantly albeit minimally increased when FFR_CT was added to on-site CCTA assessment (ΔAUC = 0.03, p = 0.02).ConclusionsIn comprehensive on-site CCTA assessment, V_sub/MLA2 demonstrated greatest diagnostic value for hemodynamically obstructive CAD and V_sub was incremental to all evaluated CCTA indices. Additionally, adding FFR_CT only minimally increased diagnostic performance, demonstrating that on-site CCTA assessment is a reasonable alternative to FFR_CT.     

Non-invasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with acute chest pain: Subgroup analysis of the ROMICAT II trial

BackgroundNon-invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) permits hemodynamic evaluation of coronary stenosis and may improve efficiency of assessment in stable chest pain patients. We determined feasibility of FFR_CT in the population of acute chest pain patients and assessed the relationship of FFR_CT with outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and revascularization and with plaque characteristics.MethodsWe included 68 patients (mean age 55.8 ± 8.4 years, 71% men) from the ROMICAT II trial who had ≥50% stenosis on coronary CTA or underwent additional non-invasive stress test. We evaluated coronary stenosis and high-risk plaque on coronary CTA. FFR_CT was measured in a core laboratory.ResultsWe found correlation between anatomic severity of stenosis and FFR_CT ≤0.80 vs. FFR_CT >0.80 (severe stenosis 84.8% vs. 15.2%; moderate stenosis 33.3% vs. 66.7%; mild stenosis 33.3% vs. 66.7% patients). Patients with severe stenosis had lower FFR_CT values (median 0.64, 25th-75th percentile 0.50–0.75) as compared to patients with moderate (median 0.84, 25th-75th percentile, p < 0.001) or mild stenosis (median 0.86, 25th-75th percentile 0.78–0.88, p < 0.001). The relative risk of ACS and revascularization in patients with positive FFR_CT ≤0.80 was 4.03 (95% CI 1.56–10.36) and 3.50 (95% CI 1.12–10.96), respectively. FFR_CT ≤0.80 was associated with the presence of high-risk plaque (odds ratio 3.91, 95% CI 1.55–9.85, p = 0.004) after adjustment for stenosis severity.ConclusionAbnormal FFR_CT was associated with the presence of ACS, coronary revascularization, and high-risk plaque. FFR_CT measurements correlated with anatomic severity of stenosis on coronary CTA and were feasible in population of patients with acute chest pain.     

Diagnostic concordance and discordance between angiography-based quantitative flow ratio and fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography in complex coronary artery disease

BackgroundBoth quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography (FFR_CT) have shown significant correlations with invasive wire-based fractional flow reserve. However, the correlation between QFR and FFR_CT is not fully investigated in patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation and agreement between QFR and FFR_CT in patients with de novo three-vessel disease and/or left main CAD.MethodsThis is a post-hoc sub-analysis of the international, multicenter, and randomized SYNTAX III REVOLUTION trial, in which both invasive coronary angiography and coronary computed tomography angiography were prospectively obtained prior to the heart team discussion. QFR was performed in an independent core laboratory and compared with FFR_CT analyzed by HeartFlow?. The correlation and agreement between QFR and FFR_CT were assessed per vessel. Furthermore, independent factors of diagnostic discordance between QFR and FFR_CT were evaluated.ResultsOut of 223 patients, 40 patients were excluded from this analysis due to the unavailability of FFR_CT and/or QFR, and a total of 469 vessels (183 patients) were analyzed. There was a strong correlation between QFR and FFR_CT (R ?= ?0.759; p ?< ?0.001), and the Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a mean difference of ?0.005 and a standard deviation of 0.116. An independent predictor of diagnostic concordance between QFR and FFR_CT was the lesion location in right coronary artery (RCA) (odds ratio 0.395; 95% confidence interval 0.174–0.894; P ?= ?0.026).ConclusionIn patients with complex CAD, QFR and FFR_CT were strongly correlated. The location of the lesion in RCA was associated with the highest diagnostic concordance between QFR and FFR_CT.     

Tricuspid valve anatomy of massive to torrential tricuspid regurgitation: Computed tomography analysis

BackgroundWe aimed to comprehensively assess tricuspid valve anatomy and to determine factors associated with the more advanced stages beyond severe TR (i.e., massive to torrential).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the pre-procedural cardiac CT images in patients with ≥severe TR using 3mensio software. The tricuspid valve annulus size, right-atrial and right-ventricular dimensions, tenting height, and leaflet angles were measured.ResultsA total of 103 patients were analyzed. The mean effective regurgitant orifice area was 61.7 ​± ​31.5 ​mm², vena contracta was 13.1 ​± ​4.6 ​mm, and massive/torrential TR was observed in 62 patients. Compared to patients with severe TR, patients with massive/torrential TR had a larger tricuspid annulus area (18.6 ​± ​3.4 ​cm² vs. 20.6 ​± ​5.3 ​cm², p ​= ​0.037), right atrial short-axis diameter (66.1 ​± ​9.1 ​mm vs. 70.6 ​± ​9.9 ​mm, p ​= ​0.022), increased tenting height (8.8 ​± ​3.6 ​mm vs. 10.7 ​± ​3.7 ​mm, p ​= ​0.014), and greater leaflet angles (anterior leaflet: 22 ​± ​9° vs. 32 ​± ​13°, p ​< ​0.001; posterior leaflet: 22 ​± ​11° vs. 30 ​± ​11°, p ​= ​0.003). In the multivariable logistic regression model, the angle of anterior leaflet (OR 1.08, 95%CI 1.03–1.14, p ​= ​0.004) and posterior leaflet (OR 1.07, 95%CI 1.02–1.13, p ​= ​0.007) were associated with massive/torrential TR. Additionally, patients with massive/torrential TR more often had TR jets from non-central/non-anteroseptal commissure (34% vs. 76%, p ​< ​0.001). In the multivariable model, a greater angle of the leaflets and a more elliptical annulus were associated with non-central/non-anteroseptal TR jets.ConclusionsAnterior and posterior leaflet angles are significant factors associated with massive/torrential TR. Furthermore, leaflet angles and ellipticity of the tricuspid valve are associated with the location of TR jets.     

Rationale and design of the HeartFlowNXT (HeartFlow analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: NeXt sTeps) study

IntroductionCoronary CT angiography (CTA) is an established noninvasive method for visualization of coronary artery disease. However, coronary CTA lacks physiological information; thus, it does not permit differentiation of ischemia-causing lesions. Recent advances in computational fluid dynamic techniques applied to standard coronary CTA images allow for computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR), a measure of lesion-specific ischemia. The diagnostic performance of computed FFR (FFR_CT) compared with invasively measured FFR is not yet fully established.Methods/DesignHeartFlowNXT (HeartFlow analysis of coronary blood flow using coronary CT angiography: NeXt sTeps) is a prospective, international, multicenter study designed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FFR_CT for the detection and exclusion of flow-limiting obstructive coronary stenoses, as defined by invasively measured FFR as the reference standard. FFR values ≤0.80 will be considered to be ischemia causing. All subjects (N = 270; 10 investigative sites) will undergo coronary CTA (single- or dual-source CT scanners with a minimum of 64 slices) and invasive coronary angiography with FFR. Patients with insufficient quality of coronary CTA will be excluded. Blinded core laboratory interpretation will be performed for FFR_CT, invasive coronary angiography, and FFR. Stenosis severity by coronary CTA will be evaluated by the investigative site in addition to a blinded core laboratory interpretation. The primary objective of the study is to determine the diagnostic performance of FFR_CT compared with coronary CTA alone to noninvasively determine the presence of hemodynamically significant coronary lesions. The secondary end point comprises assessment of diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FFR_CT.     

Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography: Variation of repeated analyses

BackgroundFractional flow reserve (FFR) is the standard of reference for assessing the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography (FFR_CT) is a promising new noninvasive method for assessing the physiologic significance of epicardial stenoses. The reproducibility of FFR_CT has not yet been established.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the variation of repeated analyses of FFR_CT per se and in the context of the reproducibility of repeated FFR measurements.MethodsCoronary CT angiography and invasive coronary angiography with repeated FFR measurements were performed in 28 patients (58 vessels) with suspected stable coronary artery disease. Based on the coronary CT angiography data set, FFR_CT analyses were performed twice by 2 independent blinded analysts.ResultsIn 12 of 58 (21%) vessels FFR was ≤0.80. The standard deviation for the difference between first and second FFR_CT analyses was 0.034 vs 0.033 for FFR repeated measurements (P = .722). Limits of agreement were −0.06 to 0.08 for FFR_CT and −0.07 to 0.06 for FFR. The coefficient of variation of FFR_CT (CV_FFRct) was 3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4%–4.6%) vs 2.7% (95% CI, 1.8%–3.3%) for FFR. In vessels with mean FFR ranging between 0.70 and 0.90 (n = 25), the difference between the first and second FFR_CT analyses was 0.035 and FFR repeated measurements was 0.043 (P = .357), whereas CV_FFRct was 3.3% (95% CI, 1.5%–4.3%) and coefficient of variation for FFR was 3.6% (95% CI, 2.3%–4.6%).ConclusionsThe reproducibility of both repeated FFR_CT analyses and repeated FFR measurements is high.     

Prosthesis-patient mismatch defined by cardiac computed tomography versus echocardiography after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BackgroundsEvaluation of prosthesis-patient mismatch (P-PM) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) has provided conflicting results regarding its impact on outcomes. Whether post-TAVR computed tomography angiography (CTA) evaluation of P-PM can improve our understanding is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the inter-modality (TTE vs. CTA) agreement, inter-valve platform (balloon-expanding valve [BEV] vs. self-expandable valve [SEV]) differences in P-PM severity, and outcomes related to P-PM after TAVR.MethodsWe analyzed patients with both CTA and TTE before and after TAVR. Indexed effective orifice area was calculated using two methods: TTE-derived left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area from measured diameter and post-TAVR CTA-measured area. Body size specific cut-offs for P-PM severity were used: for body mass index (BMI) ​< ​30 ​kg/m², moderate ​= ​0.66–0.85 ​cm²/m² and severe≤0.65 ​cm²/m²; for BMI ≥30 ​kg/m², moderate ​= ​0.56–0.70 ​cm²/m² and severe≤0.55 ​cm²/m².ResultsA total of 447 patients were included (median age, 83 years; 54% male). The prevalence of P-PM (moderate or severe) was lower with CTA vs. TTE (3.5% vs. 19.5%, p ​< ​0.001). The prevalence of P-PM measured by TTE was more common in BEV compared to SEV (p ​= ​0.002), while CTA assessment showed no difference in P-PM incidence and severity between TAVR platforms (p ​= ​0.40). In multivariable analysis, CTA-defined but not TTE-defined P-PM was associated with mortality after TAVR (HR:3.97; 95%CI,1.55–10.2; p ​= ​0.004). Both CTA-defined and TTE-defined P-PM were associated with the composite of death and heart failure rehospitalization.ConclusionAlthough post-TAVR CTA substantially downgraded the prevalence of P-PM compared to TTE, it identified a subset of patients with clinically relevant P-PM which associated with outcomes.     

Importance of imaging-acquisition protocol and post-processing analysis for extracellular volume fraction assessment by computed tomography

BackgroundComputed tomography angiography (CTA) assessment of myocardial extracellular volume fraction (CT-ECV) is feasible, although the protocols for imaging acquisition and post-processing methodology have varied. We aimed to identify a pragmatic protocol for CT-ECV assessment encompassing both imaging acquisition and post-processing methodologies to facilitate its clinical implementation.MethodsWe evaluated consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Pre-contrast and 3-min-delayed CTA were obtained in systole using either helical prospective-ECG-triggered (high-pitch) or axial sequential-ECG-gated acquisition, adding to standard TAVR CTA protocol. Using a dedicated software for co-registration of CTA datasets, three methodologies for ECV measurement were evaluated: (1) mid-septum region of interest (Septal ECV), (2) averaged-global ECV (Global ECV) encompassing 16-AHA segments, and (3) average of septal and lateral segments (Averaged ECVsep and Averaged ECVlat).ResultsAmong the 142 patients enrolled (median ​= ​81 years, 44% females), 8 were excluded due to significant imaging artifacts precluding Global ECV assessment. High-pitch scan mode was performed in 68 patients (48%). Suboptimal image quality for Global ECV assessment was associated with high-pitch scan mode (odds ratio: OR ​= ​2.26, p ​= ​0.036), along with the presence of intracardiac leads (OR ​= ​4.91, p ​= ​0.002), and BMI≥35 ​kg/m² (OR ​= ​2.80, p ​= ​0.026). Septal ECV [median ​= ​29.4%] and Averaged ECVsep [29.0%] were similar (p ​= ​0.108), while Averaged ECVlat [27.5%] was lower than Averaged ECVsep (p ​< ​0.001), resulting in lower Global ECV [28.6%].ConclusionsMyocardial CT-ECV assessment is feasible using a systolic sequential acquisition pre-contrast, and similar additional 3-min delayed scan. Septal ECV measurement provides similar values to Global ECV and is equally reproducible.     

Coronary and total thoracic calcium scores predict mortality and provides pathophysiologic insights in COVID-19 patients

BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread worldwide determining dramatic impacts on healthcare systems. Early identification of high-risk parameters is required in order to provide the best therapeutic approach. Coronary, thoracic aorta and aortic valve calcium can be measured from a non-gated chest computer tomography (CT) and are validated predictors of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. However, their prognostic role in acute systemic inflammatory diseases, such as COVID-19, has not been investigated.ObjectivesThe aim was to evaluate the association of coronary artery calcium and total thoracic calcium on in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients.Methods1093 consecutive patients from 16 Italian hospitals with a positive swab for COVID-19 and an admission chest CT for pneumonia severity assessment were included. At CT, coronary, aortic valve and thoracic aorta calcium were qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated separately and combined together (total thoracic calcium) by a central Core-lab blinded to patients’ outcomes.ResultsNon-survivors compared to survivors had higher coronary artery [Agatston (467.76 ​± ​570.92 vs 206.80 ​± ​424.13 ​mm², p ​< ​0.001); Volume (487.79 ​± ​565.34 vs 207.77 ​± ​406.81, p ​< ​0.001)], aortic valve [Volume (322.45 ​± ​390.90 vs 98.27 ​± ​250.74 mm², p ​< ​0.001; Agatston 337.38 ​± ​414.97 vs 111.70 ​± ​282.15, p ​< ​0.001)] and thoracic aorta [Volume (3786.71 ​± ​4225.57 vs 1487.63 ​± ​2973.19 mm², p ​< ​0.001); Agatston (4688.82 ​± ​5363.72 vs 1834.90 ​± ​3761.25, p ​< ​0.001)] calcium values. Coronary artery calcium (HR 1.308; 95% CI, 1.046–1.637, p ​= ​0.019) and total thoracic calcium (HR 1.975; 95% CI, 1.200–3.251, p ​= ​0.007) resulted to be independent predictors of in-hospital mortality.ConclusionCoronary, aortic valve and thoracic aortic calcium assessment on admission non-gated CT permits to stratify the COVID-19 patients in-hospital mortality risk.     

Implications of three different testing strategies in the diagnostic approach to patients with stable chest pain and low pretest probability of obstructive coronary artery disease

IntroductionThe clinical implications of a widespread adoption of guideline recommendations for patients with stable chest pain and low pretest probability (PTP) of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) remain unclear. We aimed to assess the results of three different testing strategies in this subgroup of patients: A) defer testing; B) perform coronary artery calcium score (CACS), withholding further testing if CACS ​= ​0 and proceeding to coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) if CACS>0; C) perform CCTA in all.MethodsTwo-center cross-sectional study assessing 1328 symptomatic patients undergoing CACS and CCTA for suspected CAD. PTP was calculated based on age, sex and symptom typicality. Obstructive CAD was defined as any luminal stenosis ≥50% on CCTA.ResultsThe prevalence of obstructive CAD was 8.6% (n ​= ​114). In the 786 patients (56.8%) with CACS ​= ​0, 8.5% (n ​= ​67) had some degree of CAD [1.9% (n ​= ​15) obstructive, and 6.6% (n ​= ​52) nonobstructive]. Among those with CACS>0 (n ​= ​542), 18.3% (n ​= ​99) had obstructive CAD. The number of patients needed to scan (NNS) to identify one patient with obstructive CAD was 13 for strategy B vs. A, and 91 for strategy C vs. B.ConclusionsUsing CACS as gatekeeper would decrease CCTA use by more than 50%, at the cost of missing obstructive CAD in one in 100 patients. These findings may help inform decisions on testing, which will ultimately depend on the willingness to accept some diagnostic uncertainty.     

Optimization of image sampling rate to lower the radiation dose of dynamic myocardial CT perfusion

BackgroundDynamic myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) has emerged as a potential strategy to combine anatomical and functional evaluation in a single modality. However, this method results in a high radiation dose.MethodsDynamic CTP was performed in 56 patients with suspected or known ischemic heart disease of whom 48 had complete CT-data. Datasets with reduced sampling rate of 2- and 3 RR-intervals (2RR and 3RR) were constructed post hoc. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) estimates from the 2RR and 3RR datasets were compared with estimates based on the full dataset (1RR) using the two one-sided test of equivalence for paired samples.ResultsSignificant equivalence was found for rest MBF_LV (p ​< ​0.001), stress MBF_LV (p ​< ​0.001) and for the CFR_LV (p ​= ​0.005) when comparing 2RR blood flow estimates with the results based on the 1RR dataset. The 2RR reconstruction protocol led to an estimated reduction in radiation dose of 35.4 ​± ​3.8%.ConclusionMBF can be quantitated with dynamic CTP using a sampling strategy of one volume for every second heartbeat. This strategy could lead to a significant reduction in radiation dose.