Safety and efficacy of the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer in trauma

The electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (EBVS) was developed as an alternative to sutures, clips, and the ultrasonic scalpel for haemostasis during open and laparoscopic surgery. The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to objectively evaluate the performance of the EBVS during trauma surgery. Data from trauma cases, in which the EBVS was used, was collected prospectively for 19 consecutive months. Data collected included: total number of EBVS applications, need for additional haemostatic devices after application, calculated time savings or loss, and hemorrhagic complications. The EBVS was used in 23 trauma cases consisting of 13 small bowel resections, 4 ileocolectomies, 2 left hemicolectomies, 1 transverse colectomy, 1 right hemicolectomy with roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy and duodenostomy, 1 Hartmann's procedure, and 1 splenorrhaphy with omental injury repair. A total of 631 applications of the device were used, averaging 27.4 applications per case. An additional suture ligature or clip placed for an inadequate EBVS seal (failure) was needed in only 1.5% of the total EBVS applications. All of these (10) occurred in one patient undergoing Hartmann's procedure for massive colonic injury. An additional 45 sutures or clips for non-EBVS failure were used in 5 cases due to proximity of bleeding to critical vascular, biliary, or bowel structures. In 17 trauma cases (74%) with intestinal resection no other means of hemostasis (sutures or clips) was required except the EBVS. The mean calculated time savings using the EBVS was 26.8 min (range 9.8-48) per case. There were no haemorrhagic complications. The EBVS is safe and effective for intestinal resections and haemostasis in trauma surgery. This novel energy source reliably seals major mesenteric vessels with little need for sutures or clips. Using the EBVS can substantially shorten operative time.     

Initial results with an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer

BACKGROUND: An electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (EBVS; Ligasure, Valleylab, Boulder, CO, USA) was developed as an alternative to suture ligatures, hemoclips, staplers, and ultrasonic coagulators for ligating vessels and tissue bundles. The EBVS seals vessels up to 7 mm in diameter by denaturing collagen and elastin within the vessel wall and surrounding connective tissue. This study is the first to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of this instrument and delineate its potential timesavings in both experimental (animal) and clinical scenarios. METHODS: A prospective review of the author's clinical experience with the EBVS in laparoscopic and open operations from October 1998 to March 2000 was performed. In addition, five Yorkshire domestic pigs underwent 150-cm small intestine resections (n = 10) using the EBVS (n = 5) and suture ligatures (n = 5). Measurements included time to complete intestinal resection, the number of applications per minute for each method, and the presence of postapplication bleeding. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test. RESULTS: The EBVS was used in 98 cases (46 laparoscopic and 52 open) with a mean of 43 applications (range, 10-150 applications) per case. The operations included 53 colon and/or small bowel resections (54.1%), 24 fundoplications (24.5%), 12 gastric resections (12.2%), 3 splenectomies, 2 pancreatectomies, 1 adrenalectomy, 1 bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy, 1 pancreatic cyst-jejunostomy, and 1 vagotomy with gastrojejunostomy. In all these cases, the EBVS was intended to be the only means of vessel ligation. An alternative ligation technique was required for bleeding in only 13 (0.3%) of more than 4,200 applications of the EBVS. No postoperative hemorrhagic complications occurred. There was an estimated mean reduction in operative time of 39 min per open procedure, and a mean prolongation in operative time of 8 min per laparoscopic procedure when the EBVS was used in lieu of suture ligatures, hemoclips, staplers, or ultrasonic coagulators. In the animal model, the mean time for completion of the intestinal resection was 251.9 s for the EBVS and 702.0 s for ligatures (p < 0.001). The mean number of applications per minute was 7.6 for the EBVS and 1.8 for ligatures (p < 0.001). No postapplication bleeding was seen. CONCLUSIONS: Initial clinical results from the use of EBVS in laparoscopic and open procedures demonstrate it to be safe and effective, reducing operative time in open procedures. Suture ligatures, ties, hemoclips, and other ligating techniques were used rarely (0.3%) after an application of the EBVS. In an experimental animal model, the EBVS was significantly faster and more efficient (more applications per minute) than ligatures for intestinal resection.     

Hepatic resections by means of electrothermal bipolar vessel device (EBVS) LigaSure V: early experience

Background Many techniques and devices are available for performing liver resection, such as clamp crushing, Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA), Hydrojet and dissecting sealer, ultrasonic shears, and, more recently, electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (EBVS). In this prospective trial we sought to evaluate the impact of EBVS on hepatic resections. Methods From March 2004 to December 2005, 24 patients from our consecutive liver resection series were enrolled in the present study. There were 17 males and 7 females with a mean age of 59.6 years (range = 41–80) who had colonic cancer metastases (18), hepatocarcinoma (3), angioma (2), and intrahepatic lithisasis (1). Patients were prospectively randomized to undergo liver resection via EBVS LigaSure V (12 patients, group A) or ultrasonic shears harmonic scalpel (HS) (12 patients, group B). Hepatic procedures did not differ significantly between the two groups and were as follows: right hepatectomy (2), left hepatectomy (1), bisegmentectomy (14), and segmentectomy (7). Results There was no mortality in either group. The mean operative time was 136.7 min (range = 90–210) in group A and 187.9 min (range = 130–360) in group B. The Pringle maneuver was done in five patients in group A [mean time = 11.4 min (range = 6–12)] and in four patients in group B [mean time = 16 min (range = 9–26)]. The mean blood loss, total bile salts, and hemoglobin concentration from drained fluid on the second postoperative day were 205.8 vs. 506.7 ml, 0.6 vs. 1.1 mmol/L, and 1.0 vs. 2.1 g/L (p < 0.05) for groups A and B, respectively. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.1 vs. 7.8 days. In group B a patient who underwent right hepatectomy for colon cancer metastases had transient hepatic failure. No patients received blood transfusions in group A, while two or more blood units were administered in two cases in group B. Conclusions In the present study EBVS proved to be safe and effective for liver resection. By means of this device, statistically significant benefits concerning blood loss, total bile salts, and hemoglobin postoperative leakage were found.     

Thyroid surgery: comparison between the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system, harmonic scalpel, and classic suture ligation

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare the outcome of total thyroidectomy using the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system, the harmonic scalpel, and the classic suture ligation technique. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from 382 consecutive total thyroidectomies from September 2004 to August 2006. Patients were divided into 3 groups: group SL patients (n = 90) underwent total thyroidectomy with the classic suture ligation technique, group L (n = 148) with the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer, and group U (n = 144) with the harmonic scalpel. The main outcomes measured were surgical and hospitalization time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, postoperative hypocalcemia, and superior and inferior laryngeal nerves injuries. RESULTS: The 3 groups were similar in terms of demographics, thyroid gland weight and pathology, perioperative complications, and hospital stay. Compared with the classic technique, surgical time was reduced significantly by about 20% when the bipolar vessel sealer or harmonic scalpel was used (93.3 +/- 12.5 vs 74.3 +/- 14.2 and 73.8 +/- 13.8 min, P = .001, and P = .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both the bipolar vessel sealer and harmonic scalpel are safe, useful, and time-saving alternatives to the traditional suture ligation technique for thyroid surgery. Because no differences were observed regarding these 2 devices, the choice should be made based on the surgeon's preferences and experience.     

Postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic uterine horn resection in a porcine model: comparison of five instruments

PURPOSE: To evaluate the postoperative adhesion formation caused by instruments used in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery and to determine the optimal instruments to use to reduce adhesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen juvenile pigs underwent laparoscopic bilateral resection of the uterine horns under general anesthesia and pneumoperitoneum. The laparoscopic procedures were carried out using monopolar electrocautery (ME) (n = 8), an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (EBVS) (n = 6), an ultrasonically activated scalpel (UAS) (n = 6), a loop-type ligature (LTL) with a steel scalpel for severing the tissues (n = 6), and an automatic stapling device (ASD) (n = 8). Second- look laparotomy was performed 14 days postoperatively, and the degree of postoperative adhesions was scored from 0 to 6. RESULTS: The mean and range of adhesion scores were 0.00 with EBVS, 0.13 (range, 0-1) with ASD, 0.33 (range, 0-2) with LTL, 1.17 (range, 0-3) with UAS, and 3.13 (range, 2-6) with ME. We found a statistically significant difference in the extent of postoperative adhesion formation associated with these 5 instruments (P < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test). CONCLUSION: Adhesion formation increased in the order EBVS < ASD < LTL < UAS < ME. Our study strongly suggests that surgical instruments can be selected to reduce postoperative adhesion formation, a particular concern in women of reproductive age.     

Comparative study of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomy

Background As an alternative to suture ligatures of the vessels, an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (EBVS) was recently developed. Meanwhile, ultrasonic coagulating shears (UCS) have been widely used clinically to provide hemostatic cutting in laparoscopic procedures. We conducted a comparative study to investigate the relative advantages of these two instruments.Methods The study included 30 patients with colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic colectomy using either the EBVS or the UCS. We performed a comparative analysis of the instruments by viewing videotapes showing their application in laparoscopic transverse colectomy and sigmoidectomy.Results Average patient age was 71.6 ± 1.4 years. Average hospital stay was 14.2 ± 1.0 days. There were no statistical differences between the groups in age and hospital stay. The incidence of rebleeding was significantly lower in the EBVS group than in the UCS group for both surgical procedures (0.3 vs 1.2 in transverse colectomy, 0.3 vs 2.0 in sigmoidectomy, respectively). In addition, the required time for mesocolon dissection was also significantly shorter when the EBVS was used in both laparoscopic transverse colectomy and sigmoidectomy (7.9 vs 18.4, 15.0 vs 27.6, respectively).Conclusion The use of the EBVS will enable surgeons to reduce the total operating time for laparoscopic colectomy.     

新荷包技术联合经肛门外翻切除在全腹腔镜下低位直肠癌根治术中的应用

目的:讨论应用新荷包技术在全腹腔镜下低位直肠癌根治术中的可行性及近期疗效。方法:分析6例应用新荷包技术行全腹腔镜下低位直肠癌根治术患者资料。患者在全腹腔镜下完成全直肠系膜切除术后,将带有缝针的钉座通过靠近上切缘处乙状结肠肠壁切口置入乙状结肠肠腔内,然后将缝针从肠壁穿出,引导钉座杆穿出肠壁,靠近钉座处用直线切闭器切断结肠;远端肠壁连同肿瘤经肛门外翻拉出体外,在直视下行肿瘤下切缘的切割闭合,完成吻合。结果:6例患者手术均顺利完成,无中转开腹;手术时间为(165±21)min,出血(55±12)m L;无吻合口瘘;术后随访未发现肿瘤局部复发及远处转移。结论:新荷包技术应用于全腔镜下直肠癌根治术具有较高的安全性及良好的短期效果,远期疗效有待进一步观察。     

Advanced Sealing and Dissecting Devices in Laparoscopic Adrenal Surgery

Objectives:

This study sought to analyze the impact of advanced sealing/dissecting devices on operative and postoperative outcomes in laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Method:

Patients were divided into three groups according to the devices used during their procedures [electrothermal bipolar vessel system (EBVS), ultrasound shears (US), and monopolar electrocautery (ME)]. A comparison of the perioperative outcomes was performed.

Results:

Conversion rates and intraoperative and postoperative complication rates did not differ among the three groups. Major blood loss that required transfusion was registered in only two cases, all of which were performed with ME. Procedures with EBVS were shorter than those with US or ME. For left adrenalectomies only, operative times were similar for US and EBVS. The use of EBVS was found to be an independent predictor of decreased operative time.

Conclusion:

The use of advanced sealing devices was associated with reduced operative time, with particular benefits in left adrenalectomy. EBVS and US may provide better hemostasis than ME.     

Effectiveness of the ultrasonic coagulating shears, LigaSure vessel sealer, and surgical clip application in biliary surgery: a comparative analysis

Advancements in laparoscopic surgery are often dictated by the limitations of technical instrumentation. Energy sources other than electrosurgery have become popular with the promise of quick and effective vascular control. With their success surgeons have begun using these on structures other than blood vessels with little or no data establishing their efficacy or safety. This study evaluates alternative energy sources in sealing ductal structures for possible use in liver or gallbladder surgery. After elective cholecystectomy cystic ducts (n = 45) were resealed ex vivo with surgical clips (n = 14), ultrasonic coagulating shears (n = 16), or electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (n = 15), and bursting pressures were measured. Nineteen additional human cystic ducts were randomized to seal by ultrasonic coagulating shears (n = 9) or electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (n = 10) and fixed in 10 per cent buffered formalin for histologic evaluation of thermal spread (mm). After this nine adult pigs were randomized to laparoscopic ligation and transection of the common bile duct using surgical clips (n = 3), ultrasonic coagulating shears (n = 3), or electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (n = 3). The animals underwent necropsy for assessment of seal integrity on the sixth postoperative day. In the ex vivo study the mean cystic duct bursting pressure was 621 mm Hg with surgical clips and 482 mm Hg with the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (P = 0.39). The mean cystic duct bursting pressure after ultrasonic coagulating shears was 278 mm Hg, which was statistically less than surgical clips (P = 0.007) and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (P = 0.02). The mean thermal spread was 3.5 mm for ultrasonic coagulating shears and 13.4 mm for electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (P = 0.0002). All animals undergoing ligation and transection of the common bile duct with ultrasonic coagulating shears and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer developed bile peritonitis by postoperative day 6 as a result of seal leak. All animals undergoing surgical clip ligation and transection of the common bile duct maintained seal integrity. The mean common bile duct pressure above the surgical clip was 12 mm Hg (range 10-14). In conclusion the acute ex vivo study demonstrated a significant difference in the cystic duct bursting pressure between surgical clips and ultrasonic coagulating shears and between electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic coagulating shears. The ultrasonic coagulating shears and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer failed to maintain seal integrity in the in vivo animal study. Given the failure of the ultrasonic coagulating shears and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer in the animal model these energy sources should not be used for transection of the cystic duct or major hepatic ducts during hepatobiliary surgery.     

A critical analysis of laparoscopic colectomy at a single institution: lessons learned after 1000 cases

BACKGROUND: A critical outcome analysis of a large, single-institution experience provides a better frame of reference for an assessment of the role of laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal pathology. METHODS: Review of a prospectively gathered database was performed of a consecutive series of laparoscopic colectomy patients who were operated on by 2 surgeons at a single institution (tertiary referral center) using standardized techniques and care plans. Patients were assessed for operative indications, type of resection, operative time, conversion, complications, duration of stay, and readmission within 30 days. RESULTS: One thousand consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy from January 1999 thru June 2004 were analyzed. The types of resections were right colectomy = 314, left/sigmoid colectomy/anterior resection = 435, total colectomy = 61, total proctocolectomy = 14, and other = 176. The indications for surgery were diverticular disease = 285, colorectal neoplasia = 285, inflammatory bowel disease = 172, rectal prolapse = 81, and other = 177. The conversion rate was 11.4%. The mean operative time was 112 +/- 45 minutes for all resections. The mean duration of hospitalization for all patients was 3.7 +/- 3.8. The overall complication rate was 9.9%, with the most frequent complications being ileus 2.8%, pulmonary 1.6%, cardiac 1.4%, and wound infection 2.6%. The 30-day readmission rate was 9.1%, and the most frequent reasons for readmission were ileus/small-bowel obstruction, intra-abdominal infection, and anastomotic leak. CONCLUSIONS: This largest single-institution experience with laparoscopic colectomy confirms the benefits of a standardized approach including shorter hospital rehabilitation and low rates of cardiopulmonary and wound complications. Efforts must be directed at improving access to training in laparoscopic colectomy techniques so that patients can benefit from this new technology.     

Use of the electrothermal bipolar vessel system (EBVS) in laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective study

Background Since laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has been adopted as the gold standard for the treatment of adrenal diseases, the development of technology for vascular control and dissection manoeuvres, amongst other things, may play a pivotal role in its further improvement. We report our experience with the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS) device for LA. Methods From January 2004 to January 2006, 50 patients (pts) undergoing LA were selected and randomized for use of the EBVS (25 pts, group A) versus the UltraSonic Shears (USS) device (25 pts, group B). Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), previous surgery and associated diseases were similar between the two groups. The main surgical parameters collected for each patient (pt) concerned operative time, major and minor complications, conversion rate, blood loss, hospital stay and histology. Results There was no mortality in either group. The right adrenalectomy mean operative time (OpT) was 51.8 mins (range 40–90 mins) and 68.6 mins (range 50–130 mins) in group A and B, respectively (P not significant). The left adrenalectomy mean OpT was 72.2 mins (range 55–100 mins) and 94 mins (range 65–140 mins) for group A and B, respectively (P < 0.05). The mean blood loss was 83 ml (group A) and 210 ml (group B) (p < 0.05). Complications were not different for the two groups. The mean hospital stay was 2.9 and 3.1 days in group A and B, respectively (P not significant). Conclusions EBVS in LA may provide a significantly short operating time and blood loss.     

The early outcome of laparoscopic sigmoid and rectal resection for endometriosis

Aim Deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is the most severe form of endometriosis and may affect the rectum and sigmoid colon. The most effective treatment is segmental resection. We report our results of rectal and sigmoid resection for this. Method The study comprises all patients who have had laparoscopic bowel resection for rectal or sigmoid endometriosis in the Päijät‐Häme Central Hospital between 1 January 2004 and 31 May 2007. Patient demographics, operative details, complications and early postoperative recovery were prospectively collected and analysed. Results A total of 31 patients were treated using a multidisciplinary approach. The mean age was 33.6 years (range 21.7–48.6) and body mass index 24.2 (17–40). The mean operation time was 253.5 min (range 56–484). There were three sigmoid and 28 rectal resections and 80 concomitant gynaecological procedures. Conversion to open surgery was not required. A total of 23 (74.2%) patients recovered without complications. There were two major complications, anastomotic leakage and rectovaginal fistula. Minor complications included transient urinary retention (2), wound infection (1), pneumonia (1) and undefined fever (2). The mean time to full peroral diet was 3.8 days (range 3–7), to first flatus 2.6 days (1–4), to first bowel movement 3.5 days (2–6) and to discharge 5.7 days (4–13). Conclusion Laparoscopic rectal and sigmoid resection for deep intestinal endometriosis is safe with few severe complications and rapid recovery. The long‐term outcome on symptoms requires further study.     

Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomies: a comparative study

Background Many devices are available for vascular control during laparoscopic colorectal procedures. Ultrasonic coagulating shears (UCS), vascular staplers, titanium or plastic clips, and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS) are currently used according to the surgeon’s preference. This study aimed to compare EBVS Ligasure with UCS. Methods We report the outcome of 200 consecutive unselected patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resections of which 100 were performed with EBVS Ligasure (from September 2004 to December 2005, group 1) and 100 with UCS harmonic scalpel (from December 2002 to June 2004, group 2). Only the following three types of operation were performed: right colectomy (RC), left colectomy (LC), and low anterior resections (LAR). Emergency procedures have been excluded. The same attending surgical teams performed or supervised all procedures. Operating time, blood loss, complications, and postoperative hospital stay were investigated. Results Age, gender, previous surgical abdominal procedures, and ASA risk were similar between the two groups, as well as was the percentage of malignant cases (74% vs. 71%, respectively). There were 32 vs. 37 RC, 50 vs. 47 LC, and 18 vs. 16 LAR in groups 1 and 2, respectively. There was no mortality in either group. A conversion to open surgery and two major complications occurred in group 2. There were no statistically significant differences in mean operating time (111 vs. 133, 140 vs. 176, and 153 vs. 201 min) and in the mean postoperative hospital stay (5.2 vs. 6.1, 6.5 vs. 7.1, and 6.8 vs 7.3 days) for RC, LC, and LAR between group 1 and 2, respectively. We do report interesting data about statistically significant differences in the blood loss: 115 vs. 370, 150 vs. 455, and 185 vs. 495 ml for RC (p < 0.001), LC (p < 0.001), and LAR (p = 0.002) between group 1 and group 2, respectively. Conclusions In our laparoscopic colorectal experience, EBVS Ligasure has proven safe and effective in vessel sealing. Patients in whom this device was used had less blood loss and slight advantages in operating time and postoperative hospital stay.     

Efficacy of the Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer in Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy with Conservation of the Splenic Artery and Vein

Introduction  Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) with conservation of the splenic artery and vein has recently been performed as a minimally invasive surgery to retain splenic function in the treatment of pancreatic diseases. As the branches of the splenic vessels are very delicate, division of these branches increases the risk of bleeding. Materials and Methods  To overcome this problem, we have used the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (EBVS) to divide branches of the splenic vessels in LSPDP while conserving the splenic vessels themselves. Results  The EBVS reliably provided excellent and safe hemostasis, minimizing the risk of serious blood loss. Conclusion  Use of the EBVS is safe and efficient in LSPDP with conservation of the splenic vessels.     

Use of the ligaSure vessel sealing system in laparoscopic adrenalectomy

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the operation of choice for benign adrenal lesions. During laparoscopic surgery, vessels are usually ligated with diathermy, ligaclips, staplers or ultrasonic coagulators. Use of the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (LigaSure; Valleylab, Boulder, CO, USA) has recently been described in a variety of procedures, not including adrenalectomy. This article is a retrospective study of 28 patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy within the University of Sydney Endocrine Surgical Unit at the Royal North Shore Hospital using the LigaSure vessel sealing system. Between July 2004 and August 2005, 28 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy using the LigaSure vessel sealing system to divide feeding adrenal vessels as well as the adrenal vein. There were no bleeding complications. The LigaSure vessel sealing system can be safely used to secure haemostasis, including division of the adrenal vein, in laparoscopic adrenalectomy.     

Impact of radiofrequency energy on intraoperative outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer in obese patients

Nowadays laparoscopic approach is accepted as a valid alternative to open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Several studies consider this approach to be safe and feasible also in obese patients, even if dissection in these patients may require a longer operative time and involve higher blood loss. To facilitate laparoscopic approach, more difficult in these patients, several energy sources for laparoscopic dissection and sealing, has been adopted recently. The aim of this study is to investigate the possible intraoperative advantages of radiofrequency energy in terms of blood loss and operative time in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for cancer. All patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer from January 2010 to December 2015 were registered in a prospective database. Patients with a body mass index BMI (kg/m²) ≥30 were defined as obese, and patients with a BMI (kg/m²) <30 were defined as non-obese. All 136 obese patients observed were divided retrospectively into 2 groups according to the devices used for dissection: 83 patients (Historical group: B) on whom dissection and coagulation were performed using other energy sources (monopolar electrocautery scissors, bipolar electrical energy, ultrasonic coagulating shears) and 53 patients who were treated with electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing (Caiman group: A). In group A, the Laparoscopic Caiman 5 (Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) was the only instrument employed in the whole procedure. The study examined only three types of operation: right colectomy (RC), left colectomy (LC), and anterior resection (AR). Preoperative data were similar for RC, LC, and AR in both groups (A and B). The mean operative time was statistically shorter in the Caiman group than in the Historical group [104 vs 124 min (p 0.004), 116 vs 140 min (p 0.004), and 125 vs 151 min (p 0.003) for RC, LC, and AR between group A and B, respectively]. Also intraoperative blood loss results significantly lower in the Caiman group than in the historical one [52 ml vs 93 for RC (p 0.003); 65 vs 120 ml for LC (p 0.001); 93 vs 145 ml for AR (p 0.002) between group A and B, respectively]. No intraoperative complications were recorded in either group. The mean conversion rate was 4.4% (6 patients). There were no statistical differences in intensive care unit (ICU) stay, functional outcomes, mean hospital stay and overall morbidity rate between the two groups. There was no mortality in either group. The use of the Caiman EBVS instrument shows significant advantages with respect to a small number of intraoperative parameters. We can conclude that use of this radiofrequency device, in the laparoscopic approach, offers advantages in terms of lower intraoperative blood loss and shorter operative time in obese patients with colorectal cancer.     

Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

The successful application of laparoscopic surgery to gallbladder disease and acute appendicitis has encouraged clinical investigators to develop this technology further in an attempt to manage other pathologic disorders of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. After gaining experience with various laparoscopic skills while performing clinical biliary tract surgery, appendectomy and then in a controlled animal laboratory, a pilot program for laparoscopic colonic surgery was initiated. Twenty patients with ages ranging from 43 to 88 years (mean age of 57 years) underwent laparoscope-assisted colon resection. In nine patients, a right hemicolectomy was performed and a sigmoid colectomy in eight. A low anterior resection, Hartman's procedure, and abdominal perineal resection were each performed in one patient. Indications for surgery were large villous adenomas or adenocarcinoma in 12, diverticular disease in 5, sigmoid endometrioma in 1, cecal volvulus in 1, and inflammatory bowel disease in 1. Eighty percent of patients were able to tolerate a liquid diet on the first postoperative day and 70% were discharged within 96 h eating a regular diet and having normal bowel movements. There were three operative complications: a 3 unit postoperative bleed managed without surgery, one patient developed marked edema of the rectosigmoid anastomosis requiring decompression with a rectal tube, and one individual with metastatic colon cancer was operated on for a mechanical small bowel obstruction 7 days after the initial laparoscopic surgery. Although laparoscope-assisted colonic surgery may still be considered a procedure in evolution, we feel that in time it has the potential to be as popular as laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Hand-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection

Background: Laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer has never gained wide acceptance among general surgeons, mainly due to the technical difficulties encountered during pelvic dissection. It has therefore been stated that these patients should undergo open rather than laparoscopic surgery. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is a new technique that has the potential to overcome many of the existing limitations of pure laparoscopy. In the treatment of rectal cancer, HALS could reproduce an operative setting similar to that of the open approach. Methods: To assess the technical feasibility of hand-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer and evaluate potential benefits and drawbacks of this new procedure, a pilot study was conducted at a university hospital on 16 consecutive patients during a 12-month period. Only patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer were included in this series. Patients' clinical data, operative time, conversion rate, complications, and early outcome measures were prospectively examined. Results: There were 9 men and 7 women. The average ± SD operation time was 238 ± 38 min. Conversion to open surgery was never required. Ten of 16 patients were off pain medication on the third postoperative day. Eight were able to walk the day after surgery. Three minor postoperative complications were recorded. Mean postoperative stay for patients without complications was 5.6 ± 1.4 days. Conclusion: From a technical standpoint, the reported hand-assisted procedure makes pelvic dissection during laparoscopic low anterior resection almost equivalent to the laparotomic operation. The incision for hand access that is needed with this technique does not seem to compromise the quick recovery of patients undergoing purely laparoscopic procedures.     

Acute and Elective Laparoscopic Resection for Complicated Sigmoid Diverticulitis: Clinical and Histological Outcome

Background

Surgical treatment of acute complicated sigmoid diverticulitis is still under debate while elective treatment of recurrent diverticulitis has proven benefits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and histological outcome of acute and elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy in patients with diverticulitis.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted where 197 patients were analyzed undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid resection for acute complicated diverticulitis and recurrent diverticulitis. Single-stage laparoscopic resection and primary anastomosis were routinely performed using a 3-trocar technique. Recorded data included age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)-score, operative time, duration of hospital stay, complications, and histological results.

Results

Ninety-one patients received laparoscopy for acute diverticular disease (group I) and 93 patients underwent elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis (group II). M/F ratio was 49:42 for group I and 37:56 for group II. Mean operative time and hospital stay was similar in both groups. Majority of patients were ASA II in both groups. Rate of minor complications was 14.3 % in group I and 7.5 % in group II. Major complications were 2.2 % for acute treatment and 4.3 % for elective resections. No anastomotic leakage and no mortality occurred. In 32.3 % of the patients of elective group II, destruction of the colonic wall with pericolic abscess, fistulization, or fibrinoid purulent peritonitis were identified.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic surgery for acute diverticular disease is safe and effective. Continuing bowl inflammations in histological specimens justify sigmoid resection in elective patients, but more effective pre-operative parameters need to be found to identify patients that would benefit from surgery during the initial episode.     

Operative time and other outcomes of the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (LigaSure) versus other methods for surgical hemostasis: a meta-analysis

A meta-analysis was performed of 29 prospective, randomized trials (published January 1, 2000, to August 14, 2007) comparing an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (EBVS-LigaSure, Covidien) (total n = 1107 patients) with either clamping with suture ligation/ electrocauterization (n = 1079 patients) or ultrasonic energy (eg, Harmonic Scalpel, Johnson & Johnson). Hemorrhoidectomy (12 articles), hysterectomy (4 articles), and thyroidectomy (3 articles) were the most common procedures. For 15 of 26 studies reporting standard deviations, the normalized mean operative time reduction for EBVS equaled 28% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18%-39%, P < .0001) compared with conventional surgical hemostasis. Operative time was reduced with EBVS in 24 of 26 studies (P < .0001). EBVS was associated with 43 mL (95% CI 14-73 mL, P = .0021) less blood loss, fewer complications (odds ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.92, P = .02), and mean reduction in postoperative pain of 2.8 units (95% CI 1.5-4.1, P < .0001). Five studies used ultrasonic energy as the comparator, but none reported standard deviation so data could not be pooled.