The effect of a mandibular advancement appliance on cervical lordosis in patients with TMD and cervical pain

Aims:

A preliminary study to compare cervical lordosis by means of cervical cephalometric analysis, before and after six months of continuous mandibular advancement appliance (MAA) use, and to show how physical therapy posture re-education would improve the cervical lordosis angle.

Methodology:

Twenty-two female patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and cervical pain with lordosis <20° were included. Patients had to have a muscle pain history for at least six months, and with an intensity ≥6, measured by means of a visual analog scale (a horizontal 0–10 numeric rating scale with 0 labeled as ‘no pain’ and 10 as ‘worst imaginable pain’). Patients had to present the angle formed by the posterior tangents to C2 and C7 of equal or less than 20°. Cephalometric and clinical diagnostics were performed initially (baseline) and at the end of the study period (six months). During the third month with MAA treatment, a physical therapist evaluated the postural deficit and performed a program of postural re-education. Angular and linear dimension data presented a normal distribution (P>0·05; Shapiro Wilk Test), so the paired comparison of the cephalometric measurements was made by t-test for dependent samples.

Results:

Angle 1 (OPT/7CVT); angle 3 (CVT/EVT) and angle 4 (2CL/7CL) showed a significant increase in the cervical lordosis. Angle 2 (MGP/OP), angle 5 (HOR/CVT) and the distances C0–C2 and Pt–VER, presented no significant changes.

Conclusions:

The increase in cervical lordosis implies that six months of continuous MAA use, together with a program of postural re-education, promotes the homeostasis of the craniocervical system.     

The effects of manual therapy and exercise directed at the cervical spine on pain and pressure pain sensitivity in patients with myofascial temporomandibular disorders

Summary No studies have investigated the effects of the treatments directed at the cervical spine in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Our aim was to investigate the effects of joint mobilization and exercise directed at the cervical spine on pain intensity and pressure pain sensitivity in the muscles of mastication in patients with TMD. Nineteen patients (14 females), aged 19–57 years, with myofascial TMD were included. All patients received a total of 10 treatment session over a 5‐week period (twice per week). Treatment included manual therapy techniques and exercise directed at the cervical spine. Outcome measures included bilateral pressure pain threshold (PPT) levels over the masseter and temporalis muscles, active pain‐free mouth opening (mm) and pain (Visual Analogue Scale) and were all assessed pre‐intervention, 48 h after the last treatment (post‐intervention) and at 12‐week follow‐up period. Mixed‐model anovas were used to examine the effects of the intervention on each outcome measure. Within‐group effect sizes were calculated in order to assess clinical effect. The 2 × 3 mixed model anova revealed significant effect for time (F = 77·8; P < 0·001) but not for side (F = 0·2; P = 0·7) for changes in PPT over the masseter muscle and over the temporalis muscle (time: F = 66·8; P < 0·001; side: F = 0·07; P = 0·8). Post hoc revealed significant differences between pre‐intervention and both post‐intervention and follow‐up periods (P < 0·001) but not between post‐intervention and follow‐up period (P = 0·9) for both muscles. Within‐group effect sizes were large (d > 1·0) for both follow‐up periods in both muscles. The anova found a significant effect for time (F = 78·6; P < 0·001) for changes in pain intensity and active pain‐free mouth opening (F = 17·1; P < 0·001). Significant differences were found between pre‐intervention and both post‐intervention and follow‐up periods (P < 0·001) but not between the post‐intervention and follow‐up period (P > 0·7). Within‐group effect sizes were large (d > 0·8) for both post‐intervention and follow‐up periods. The application of treatment directed at the cervical spine may be beneficial in decreasing pain intensity, increasing PPTs over the masticatory muscles and an increasing pain‐free mouth opening in patients with myofascial TMD.     

Cervical spine alignment and hyoid bone positioning with temporomandibular disorders

The relationships between temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders and cervical structure dysfunctions have already been demonstrated. The aim of the present study was to investigate functional and structural alterations of the head and neck of 17 individuals with TMJ disorders (TMD group), compared with a control group of 17 asymptomatic subjects in a cross-sectional design. The outcome variables included pain on palpation of the sternocleidomastoideus, superior trapezius and subocciptal muscles, as well as radiographic measures of alignment of the cervical spine and positioning of the hyoid bone. Cervical alignment, determined by measures of the cervical curvature angle, was investigated by the Cobb method. Independent Student t-tests were used to investigate differences between groups for all outcome variables (alpha < 0.05). The results demonstrated that individuals with TMJ disorders, when compared with asymptomatic subjects, presented higher levels of perception of pain in all cervical muscles (P < 0.0001). No significant differences were found between groups for the cervical alignment measures. In the TMD group, the position of the hyoid bone in relation to the cervical spine did not appear to be different from the control group.     

颞下颌关节紊乱病患者疼痛的临床描述分析

目的通过研究颞下颌关节紊乱病（TMD）患者对疼痛的主观描述情况,分析TMD患者疼痛的特点。方法选择以口颌面部疼痛为主诉的TMD患者90例为研究对象,检测患者疼痛的强度和相关功能丧失的程度,记录患者自述的疼痛规律和描述疼痛的词汇。结果90例患者主要为轻到中等强度的疼痛,男女之间以及急、慢性期之间疼痛强度的差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。TMD疼痛对咀嚼功能的影响最大,其次是对心情状况有比较大的影响。急、慢性期患者下颌静止时疼痛出现率无统计学差异（P>0.05）。急性期患者常用酸痛、隐痛、刺痛和抽着痛来描述疼痛,慢性期患者常用的词汇是钝痛、木痛和胀痛。结论急、慢性期TMD导致的疼痛强度均较低,主要影响患者的咀嚼功能和心理状态。急、慢性TMD疼痛的描述词汇有所不同。     

Relationship between specific temporomandibular disorders and impaired upper neck performance

Upper neck impairments are more prevalent in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) but the differences between specific types of TMDs are unclear. This study evaluated the distribution of such impairments among different forms of TMD. In total, 116 participants (86 women and 30 men, age range 21–75 yr) were investigated. Forty-two individuals had no TMDs and were assigned to the control group. The remaining 74 patients were assigned to one of three groups based on the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) findings: pain-related (n = 37); intra-articular (n = 17); or mixed (combined pain-related and intra-articular) (n = 20). Analyses of impairments included between-group comparisons of key parameters of upper neck performance (active/passive mobility and muscular capabilities) and pain (subjective neck disability and pain sensitivity). Patients in the pain-related and mixed TMD groups were found to have decreased upper neck mobility in the cervical flexion-rotation test compared with patients in intra-articular and control groups, as well as poorer capabilities of the deep neck flexor muscles in the cranio-cervical flexion test compared to the control group. It was concluded that patients with pain-related TMD diagnoses are more likely to experience significant upper-neck hypomobility and poor muscular capabilities than patients with intra-articular diagnoses of TMD.     

Correlation between cervical spine and temporomandibular disorders

Neuroanatomical interconnections and neurophysiological relationships between the orofacial area and the cervical spine have been documented earlier. The present single-blind study was aimed at screening possible correlations between clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and cervical spine disorders. Thirty-one consecutive patients with symptoms of TMD and 30 controls underwent a standardised clinical examination of the masticatory system, evaluating range of motion of the mandible, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function and pain of the TMJ and masticatory muscles. Afterwards subjects were referred for clinical examination of the cervical spine, evaluating segmental limitations, tender points upon palpation of the muscles, hyperalgesia and hypermobility. The results indicated that segmental limitations (especially at the C0–C3 levels) and tender points (especially in the m. sternocleidomastoideus and m. trapezius) are significantly more present in patients than in controls. Hyperalgesia was present only in the patient group (12–16%). Received: 18 January 1998 / Accepted: 29 April 1998     

Upper cervical range of motion is impaired in patients with temporomandibular disorders

Aims:

Clinicians increasingly suggest assessment and treatment of the cervical spine in patients with temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD); however, few studies have investigated upper cervical spine mobility in people who suffer from TMD. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether patients with TMD pain (with or without headache) present with upper cervical spine impairment when compared with asymptomatic subjects.

Methodology:

A single blind examiner evaluated cervical range of motion (ROM) measures including axial rotation during the flexion–rotation test (FRT) and sagittal plane ROM. Twenty asymptomatic subjects were compared with 37 subjects with pain attributed to TMD, confirmed by the Revised Research Diagnostic Criteria. Subjects with TMD were divided according to the presence of headache (26 without headache TMDNHA, 11 with headache TMDHA). One-way analysis of variance and planned orthogonal comparisons were used to determine differences in cervical mobility between groups. All subjects with TMD were positive on the FRT with restricted ROM, while none were in the control group.

Results:

The analysis of variance revealed significant differences between groups for the FRT F(2,54)?=?57·96, P<0·001) and for sagittal ROM [F(2,54)?=?5·69, P?=?0·006]. Findings show that the TMDHA group had less axial rotation than group TMDNHA, and both TMD groups had less ROM than controls. For sagittal ROM, the only difference was between group TMDHA and controls.

Conclusions:

Subjects with TMD had signs of upper cervical spine movement impairment, greater in those with headache. Only subjects with TMD and headache had impairment of cervical spine sagittal plane mobility. This study provides evidence for the importance of examination of upper cervical mobility determined by the FRT in patients who suffer from TMD.     

The gap between dental education and clinical treatment in temporomandibular disorders and orofacial pain

Implementation of research findings in patient care ideally will follow in a continuous cycle, and clinical questions from practitioners should stimulate research. Even in the most optimal situations, there will be a gap between the steady flow of new findings from research and their eventual implementation in clinical practice. In the clinical practice of temporomandibular disorders and orofacial pain (TMD/OFP) simple cases outnumber the more complex cases by far. Therefore, research implications for the general dental practitioner, whose patients are rarely represented in research populations, may differ from what is published and taught. Treatment options like counselling, occlusal treatments (reversible as a rule and irreversible by exception) and physiotherapy can be very successful in the hands of the general dental practitioner. European dental schools should define additional amendments to the recently proposed profile and competencies for the European dentist, in order to focus on the relevant and current knowledge on temporomandibular disorders and orofacial pain. These amendments should address the adequate diagnosis and management of non-complex TMD cases and the need to refer to a TMD/OFP specialist in complex cases. Professional organizations such as the European Academy of Craniomandibular disorders can endorse better TMD/OFP education and training.     

Anxiety and personality traits in patients with muscle related temporomandibular disorders

This study tested the hypothesis that muscle related temporomandibular disorder patients with cervical muscle pain exhibit greater degree of psychological distress compared with patients without cervical muscle pain and controls. Thirty-eight muscle related temporomandibular disorder patients including 10 patients with cervical muscle pain and 41 healthy individuals as controls participated in the study. State and trait anxiety levels were assessed with the Spielberger's state and trait anxiety inventory. Personality traits (extroversion, neuroticism, psychoticism and social desirability) were assessed using the Eysenck's personality questionnaire, and the pain intensities described over the muscles were recorded using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. The muscle related temporomandibular disorder patients, in general, exhibited significantly higher degrees of neuroticism and trait anxiety. The patients with cervical muscle pain demonstrated a significantly higher level of psychoticism compared with the patients without cervical muscle pain and the controls and a significantly higher state anxiety level than the controls. They also demonstrated higher pain intensities in masseter and temporalis muscles compared with patients without cervical muscle pain. It has been suggested that either subjects with psychological distress are prone to temporomandibular disorders, or psychological distress is a manifestation of existing chronic pain conditions. The present findings demand further investigations and broader approach in management, as muscle related temporomandibular disorder patients with cervical muscle pain were both physically and psychologically compromised to a greater degree compared with patients without cervical muscle pain.     

Psychosocial factors associated with pain outcomes in patients with painful temporomandibular disorders and headaches

The objective of this study was to assess the association between psychosocial factors (in terms of anxiety, somatization, depression, and optimism) and pain (in terms of headache pain intensity and pain-related disability), in patients with a painful temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and one of the following headache types: migraine, tension-type headache (TTH), or headache attributed to TMD, corrected for the influence of bruxism. A retrospective study was conducted at an orofacial pain and dysfunction (OPD) clinic. Inclusion criteria were painful TMD, with migraine, TTH, and/or headache attributed to TMD. Linear regressions were performed to assess the influence of psychosocial variables on pain intensity and on pain-related disability, stratified per headache type. The regression models were corrected for bruxism and the presence of multiple headache types. A total of 323 patients (61% female; mean age 42.9, SD 14.4 years) were included. Headache pain intensity only had significant associations in TMD-pain patients with headache attributed to TMD, and anxiety showed the strongest relation (β = 0.353) with pain intensity. Pain-related disability was most strongly associated with depression in TMD-pain patients with TTH (β = 0.444), and with somatization in patients with headache attributed to TMD (β = 0.399). In conclusion, the influence of psychosocial factors on headache pain intensity and pain-related disability depends on the headache type presenting.     

Relationship between self‐reported sleep bruxism and pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between self‐reported sleep bruxism and the age, gender, clinical subtypes of temporomandibular disorders (TMD), pain intensity and grade of chronic pain in patients previously diagnosed with TMD. Thousand two‐hundred and twenty patients of the Andalusian Health Service were examined using the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) questionnaire. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were those included in the RDC/TMD criteria. The bruxism diagnosis was drawn from the question, ‘Have you been told, or do you notice that you grind your teeth or clench your jaw while sleeping at night?’ in the anamnestic portion of the questionnaire. A bivariate analysis was conducted, comparing the presence of perceived parafunctional activity with age (over age 60 and under age 60), gender, different subtypes of TMD, pain intensity, grade of chronic pain and presence of self‐perceived locked joints. The overall prevalence of self‐reported sleep bruxism (SB) was 54·51%. A statistically significant association was found between the presence of SB and patients under age 60, women, greater pain intensity, greater pain interference with activities of daily living, and the axis‐I groups affected by both muscular and articular pathology. There is a statistically significant association between self‐reported sleep bruxism and women under age 60 who have painful symptoms of TMD. There is also a positive association between this parafunctional habit and the presence of chronic pain. However, more studies that cover larger samples and differentiate between sleep bruxism and awake bruxism are needed.     

Associations among temporomandibular disorders,chronic neck pain and neck pain disability in computer office workers: a pilot study

Neck pain is the most common musculoskeletal complaint among computer office workers. There are several reports about the coexistence of neck pain and temporomandibular disorders (TMD). However, there are no studies investigating this association in the context of work involving computers. The purpose of this study was to verify the association between TMD and neck pain in computer office workers. Fifty‐two female computer workers who were divided into two groups: (i) those with self‐reported chronic neck pain and disability (WNP) (n = 26) and (ii) those without self‐reported neck pain (WONP) (n = 26), and a control group (CG) consisting of 26 women who did not work with computers participated in this study. Clinical assessments were performed to establish a diagnosis of TMD, and craniocervical mechanical pain was assessed using manual palpation and pressure pain threshold (PPT). The results of this study showed that the WNP group had a higher percentage of participants with TMD than the WONP group (42·30% vs. 23·07%, χ² = 5·70, P = 0·02). PPTs in all cervical sites were significantly lower in the groups WNP and WONP compared to the CG. Regression analysis revealed TMD, neck pain and work‐related factors to be good predictors of disability (R² = 0·93, P < 0·001). These results highlighted the importance of considering the work conditions of patients with TMD, as neck disability in computer workers is explained by the association among neck pain, TMD and unfavourable workplace conditions. Consequently, this study attempted to emphasise the importance of considering work activity for minimising neck pain‐related disability.     

Effect of weather on temporal pain patterns in patients with temporomandibular disorders and migraine

Patients with masticatory muscle pain and migraine typically report that the intensity of pain fluctuates over time and is affected by weather changes. Weather variables, such as ambient temperature and humidity, may vary significantly depending on whether the individual is outdoor or indoor. It is, therefore, important to assess these variables at the individual level using portable monitors, during everyday life. This study aimed to determine and compare the temporal patterns of pain in individuals affected with facial and head pain and to investigate its relation with weather changes. Eleven patients (27·3 ± 7·4 years) with chronic masticatory muscle pain (MP) and twenty (33·1 ± 8·7 years) with migraine headache (MH) were asked to report their current pain level on a visual analogue scale (VAS) every hour over fourteen consecutive days. The VAS scores were collected using portable data‐loggers, which were also used to record temperature, atmospheric pressure and relative humidity. VAS scores varied markedly over time in both groups. Pain VAS scores fluctuate less in the MP group than in the MH group, but their mean, minimum and maximum values were higher than those of migraine patients (all P < 0·05). Pain scores <2 cm were more common in the MH than in the MP group (P < 0·001). Perceived intensity of pain was negatively associated with atmospheric pressure in the MP group and positively associated with temperature and atmospheric in the MH group. Our results reveal that patients with masticatory muscle pain and patients with migraine present typical temporal pain patterns that are influenced in a different way by weather changes.     

Alexithymia partly predicts pain,poor health and social difficulties in patients with temporomandibular disorders

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are functional diseases of the masticatory system; their symptoms are clicking, difficulty opening the mouth wide, ear pain, facial pain and headaches. The relationships among distress, emotional factors and TMD are well known. It was shown that patients with TMD have little awareness of their inner states and emotions, and it was found that those reporting oro‐facial pain presented higher alexithymia than did asymptomatic people. Other authors confirmed that alexithymia was higher in the painful TMD group than controls. This study was aimed to evaluate whether alexithymia and its components can be considered as predisposing factors for pain severity, poor health and greater social difficulties in patients with TMD. One hundred thirty‐three patients received a diagnosis of TMD and completed the 20‐item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Multiple stepwise regressions showed that alexithymia and age explained 10% of the pain and 31% of poor health and also that alexithymia explained 7% of social difficulty. A direct comparison of patients with TMD based on alexithymia revealed a higher presence of pain in alexithymic patients with TMD than in those characterised by moderate or no alexithymia. In conclusion, alexithymia partly predicts pain, poor health and social difficulties in patients with TMD. Furthermore, alexithymic patients have more pain than those with moderate or low alexithymia.     

头颈姿势位与颞下颌关节紊乱病的相关性

头颈姿势位受关注多年,其与颞下颌关节紊乱病的相关性是近年来研究与争论的热点。本文就影响头颈姿势位的因素、颞下颌关节紊乱病患者头颈姿势位的改变、异常头颈姿势位引起颞下颌关节紊乱病的可能机制等作一综述。     

Validation of the Pain Resilience Scale in Chinese‐speaking patients with temporomandibular disorders pain

To validate the Pain Resilience Scale (PRS) for use in Chinese patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) pain. According to international guidelines, the original PRS was first translated and cross‐culturally adapted to formulate the Chinese version of PRS (PRS‐C). A total of 152 patients with TMD pain were recruited to complete series of questionnaires. Reliability of the PRS‐C was investigated using internal consistency and test‐retest reliability. Validity of the PRS‐C was calculated using cross‐cultural validity and convergent validity. Cross‐cultural validity was evaluated by examining the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). And convergent validity was examined through correlating the PRS‐C scores with scores of 2 commonly used pain‐related measures (the Connor‐Davidson Resilience Scale [CD‐RISC] and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders [TSK‐TMD]). The PRS‐C had a high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92) and good test‐retest reliability (intra‐class correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.81). The CFA supported a 2‐factor model for the PRS‐C with acceptable fit to the data. The fit indices were chi‐square/DF = 2.21, GFI = 0.91, TLI = 0.97, CFI = 0.98 and RMSEA = 0.08. As regards convergent validity, the PRS‐C evidenced moderate‐to‐good relationships with the CD‐RISC and the TSK‐TMD. The PRS‐C shows good psychometric properties and could be considered as a reliable and valid measure to evaluate pain‐related resilience in patients with TMD pain.     

弱激光治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病疼痛的研究进展

疼痛是颞下颌关节紊乱病患者最常见的临床表现之一,也是大多数人治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的原因。弱激光在牙科领域的应用越来越广泛,且在颞下颌关节紊乱病治疗中的应用也越来越多,用来抗炎和缓解疼痛。本文对弱激光疗法在治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病疼痛机理方面进行概述。了解弱激光疗法的机制对弱激光治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病具有重要意义。     

Correlation between the levels of non‐specific physical symptoms and pressure pain thresholds measured by algometry in patients with temporomandibular disorders

Recent studies showed that patients with chronic TMD pain also feature increased sensitivity in other craniofacial regions, and even in remote peripheral areas, suggesting that nociceptive processing is centrally facilitated in this patient population. The aim of this study was to investigate the existence of a negative correlation between the levels of non‐specific physical symptoms and pressure pain thresholds measured by algometry at sites distant from the chief complaint of oro‐facial pain in patients with TMD. A total of 20 female patients were evaluated comprising 11 patients diagnosed with myofascial pain (Group I of RDC/TMD) and 9 patients with arthralgia (Group III of RDC/TMD), with both reporting chronic TMD pain for at least 3 months. Patients were tested by the pressure algometry technique, and, in the same visit, clinical diagnosis and levels of non‐specific physical symptoms, including pain‐related issues or not, were obtained. The raw scores were then standardised into a T‐score. The possible correlation between the dependent variable levels of non‐specific physical symptoms and pressure pain thresholds measured by algometry at sites distant from the chief complaint of oro‐facial pain was assessed with Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results were considered statistically significant, which stood a lower than 5% probability of occurring by chance (P < 0·05). A statistically significant (P = 0·02) negative correlation (?0·51) was found to exist between the levels of non‐specific physical symptoms, only if including issues involving pain‐related symptoms, and experimental pressure pain thresholds in patients with painful TMD.     

The relationship between the occlusal interference side and the symptomatic side in temporomandibular disorders

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the facial side of pain or clicking symptoms and the side of occlusal interference, and to examine the features of pain and clicking patients in terms of frequencies of occlusal interferences in relation to the symptomatic side. Occlusal conditions in 31 pain patients and 40 clicking patients were investigated just after the relief of pain or clicking solely by means of bite plane therapy. The symptomatic side did not associate with the side of fewer occlusal contacts in intercuspal position, no canine contact on the working side, occlusal contact on the non-working side, or unilateral contact in retruded contact position. The results of this study suggest that pain or clicking does not necessarily tend to appear on the side of these occlusal interferences. Additionally, characteristic inclination for pain and clicking patients in terms of frequencies of occlusal interferences in relation to the symptomatic side was not identified.