小剂量左旋氨氯地平、替米沙坦和氢氯噻嗪同时或不同时给药对杓型高血压的影响

目的 探讨小剂量左旋氨氯地平、替米沙坦及氢氯噻嗪同时或不同时给药对杓型高血压的影响.方法 选择我院门诊及住院杓型高血压患者272例（收缩压＜ 180 mm Hg,舒张压91～109 mm Hg）,年龄＞45岁,男性179例,女性93例.随机分为两组：Ⅰ组（不同时给药组,135例）晨服替米沙坦40 mg和氢氯噻嗪10 mg,晚服左旋氨氯地平2.5 mg;Ⅱ组（同时给药组,137例）以上三种药物均晨服（剂量同Ⅰ组）.两组基线资料均衡可比.所有病例治疗前及治疗8周后进行动态血压监测.结果 治疗8周后,Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组的24h收缩压/舒张压均较治疗前降低[（128.64± 12.76）mm Hg/（82.46±7.18）mm Hg比（144.36±15.86）mm Hg/（92.34±7.86）mm Hg,P＜0.01,（127.54±13.06）mm Hg/（81.92±7.28）mm Hg比（143.68±15.58）mm Hg/（92.52±7.64）mm Hg,P＜0.01],两组间降低幅度差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）;夜间收缩压/舒张压较治疗前降低[（134.28 ±13.36）mm Hg/（82.76±6.84）mm Hg比（116.42±12.14）mm Hg/（70.18±6.28）mm Hg,P＜0.01,（134.46±13.58）mm Hg/（82.48±6.72）mm Hg比（118.18±12.18）mm Hg/（71.82±6.86）mm Hg,P＜0.01],降低幅度差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.Ⅰ组治疗后收缩压昼夜差值高于治疗前[（21.10±4.88）mm Hg比（17.32±4.26）mm Hg,P＜0.05];Ⅱ组差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.治疗后Ⅰ组收缩压昼夜差值高于Ⅱ组[（21.10±4.88）mm Hg和（18.04±4.26）mm Hg,两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）].结论 对于杓型高血压患者,小剂量左旋氨氯地平、替米沙坦和氢氯噻嗪无论同时或不同时给药均能有效地控制24h、日间和夜间血压,而同时一次给药患者的依从性会更好,还能减少深杓型血压的发生.     

左旋氨氯地平、替米沙坦及氢氯噻嗪同时或不同时给药对反杓型高血压的影响

目的探讨左旋氨氯地平、替米沙坦及氢氯噻嗪同时或不同时给药对反杓型高血压的影响。方法收缩压(SBP)<180 mm Hg,舒张压(DBP)91~109 mm Hg,年龄>45岁的反杓型高血压患者200例,随机分为不同时给药组:晨服替米沙坦40 mg、氢氯噻嗪10 mg,晚服左旋氨氯地平5 mg;同时给药组上述3种药物均晨服。治疗前及治疗后8 w行动态血压监测检查。结果治疗8 w后两组24 h SBP/DBP分别降低30.28/13.12 mm Hg和29.98/13.87 mm Hg,日间SBP/DBP分别降低24.26/10.39 mm Hg和26.69/12.24 mmg,夜间SBP/DBP分别降低37.50/17.71 mm Hg和32.94/15.41 mm Hg,均较治疗前明显下降(P<0.05);治疗后两组24 h SBP/DBP相较无明显差异(P>0.05),而治疗后不同时给药组日间SBP/DBP较同时给药组高(P<0.05),夜间SBP/DBP较同时给药组低(P<0.05)。不同时给药组的逆转率为61%,高于同时给药组的为31%(P<0.05)。结论左旋氨氯地平、替米沙坦及氢氯噻嗪两种服药方法均能有效控制24 h血压,不同时给药能更好地逆转杓型血压。     

小剂量左旋氨氯地平、替米沙坦及氢氯噻嗪同时和不同时给药对血压晨峰的影响

目的 探讨小剂量左旋氨氯地平、替米沙坦及氢氯噻嗪同时与不同时给药对轻中度高血压患者血压晨峰（MBPS）的影响.方法 选择我院2011年5月至2014年5月门诊及住院的高血压患者138例,男性86例,女性52例.入选者收缩压（SBP）＜180 mm Hg,舒张压（DBP）91～109 mm Hg,年龄＞45岁,24 h动态血压监测（ABDM）具有MBPS现象.随机分为2组：Ⅰ组（不同时给药组,70例）晨服替米沙坦40 mg和氢氯噻嗪10 mg,晚服左旋氨氯地平2.5 mg;Ⅱ组（同时给药组,68例）以上三种药物均晨服.所有病例治疗前及治疗8周后进行ABPM监测.结果 治疗8周后,Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组的24h SBP/DBP均较治疗前分别降低17.34/10.26 mm Hg和16.64/10.42 mm Hg,日间SBP/DBP分别降低15.48/9.86 mm Hg和17.36/10.28 mm Hg,均较治疗前明显降低（P＜0.01）,两组间降低幅度未见统计学差异（P＞0.05）.两组夜间SBP/DBP分别降低21.52/11.22 mm Hg和15.82/10.14 mm Hg,均较治疗前明显降低（P＜0.01）;Ⅰ组治疗后降低幅度较Ⅱ组明显,两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.治疗前与治疗8周后清晨收缩压差值（MSBPD）Ⅰ组分别为（37.26±10.34）mm Hg和（23.14±7.82）mm Hg,治疗后显著降低（P＜0.01）;Ⅱ组分别为（37.48±10.32）mm Hg和（29.34±8.46）mmHg,治疗后明显降低（P＜0.05）,两组治疗后比较,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.结论 对于晨峰高血压患者,小剂量左旋氨氯地平、替米沙坦及氢氯噻嗪无论同时还是不同时给药均能有效控制24h、日间和夜间血压;而不同时给药治疗夜间血压优于同时给药,尤其控制MBPS现象更明显.     

替米沙坦和氢氯噻嗪联合治疗非杓型高血压的临床观察

目的观察替米沙坦和氢氯噻嗪联合治疗非杓型高血压的疗效。方法通过动态血压监测选出非杓型高血压患者66例,随机分为氢氯噻嗪组和替米沙坦合用氢氯噻嗪组,治疗4周后行动态血压监测。结果两组治疗前后比较及治疗后两组间比较日间和夜间收缩压、舒张压均有显著差异;两组治疗后夜间血压均较治疗前下降,替米沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪组夜间血压下降更为明显。结论两组治疗后均可以使血压的昼夜节律由非杓型转为杓型,替米沙坦合用氢氯噻嗪对夜间血压的降压作用更大,治疗非杓型高血压更为有效。     

替米沙坦氢氯噻嗪胶囊与替米沙坦片治疗轻中度原发性高血压的临床研究

目的评价替米沙坦氢氯噻嗪胶囊治疗轻中度原发性高血压的有效性和安全性。方法符合入排标准的轻中度原发性高血压患者300例（8家医院）,先后经2周清洗期和4周替米沙坦片单药治疗期后,血压未达标者（90mmHg≤舒张压（diastolic blood pressure,DBP）〈110mmHg并且收缩压（systolic blood pressure,SBP〈180mmHg）按随机双盲对照原则分为两组,分别给予替米沙坦氢氯噻嗪胶囊（A组）与替米沙坦片（B组）。主要观察指标是双盲治疗8周后较开始双盲治疗时DBP绝对值的变化。其他观察指标还包括血生化指标、心电图、24小时动态血压（ABPM）参数等。结果 （1）共213例（A组即替米沙坦氢氯噻嗪胶囊组108例,B组即替米沙坦片组105例）完成该研究,33例失访,1例发生严重不良事件——心肌梗塞（研究者判断与本研究药物无关）。（2）双盲治疗8周后DBP绝对值的变化两组间有显著性差异（A组（12.66±10.76）mmHg,B组（7.89±12.15）mmHg,P=0.0203）。（3）A组总有效率、平均血压下降值、达目的的血压率均显著高于B组（P均〈0.05）。两组谷峰比值均〉50%。（4）两组不良事件发生率（A组21.8%;B组22.1%,P=0.9461）及与研究药物有关不良事件发生率（A组8.1%;B组9.8%,P=0.6264）均无显著性差异。结论替米沙坦氢氯噻嗪胶囊与替米沙坦片（80mg）对轻、中度原发性高血压患者有平稳长效的降压疗效和相同的安全性,且替米沙坦氢氯噻嗪胶囊的疗效优于单方的替米沙坦片。     

替米沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪治疗原发性高血压的疗效观察

目的评价替米沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪治疗原发性高血压的有效性和安全性。方法 60例原发性高血压患者服用替米沙坦与氢氯噻嗪片剂,疗程12周。结果 60例中显效36例(60.00%);无效5例(8.33%);总有效率91.66%。治疗后2、4、12周血压与治疗前比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05),但心率无明显变化(P0.05)。结论替米沙坦与氢氯噻嗪两药联合应用治疗原发性高血压安全有效,且具有价格低、药源广、疗效好、并发症少等优点,值得基层医院推广应用。     

替米沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪治疗原发性高血压的临床观察

目的观察替米沙坦与氢氯噻嗪联合治疗原发性高血压的临床疗效与安全性。方法采用随机对照方法将原发性高血压患者93例分成两组,对照组服用替米沙坦40mg,1次/d,治疗组在对照组的基础上加服氢氯噻嗪12.5～25.0mg,1次/d,疗程均为8周。结果治疗8周后,治疗组总有效率为89.4%,对照组的总有效率为71.7%,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05),治疗组与对照组不良反应发生例数分别为5例和4例。结论替米沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪治疗原发性高血压的疗效明显好于单用替米沙坦,且不良反应发生少,患者医嘱依从性高。     

替米沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪治疗对老年收缩期高血压患者的降压效果及左室肥厚的影响

目的比较治疗前后替米沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)对老年收缩期高血压患者的降压效果及左室肥厚的影响。方法收集60岁以上老年收缩期高血压患者120例,其中左室肥厚54例,予以替米沙坦40 mg联合氢氯噻嗪12.5 mg口服,1次/d,降压不达标替米沙坦增加至80 mg,1次/d,疗程24 w。观察治疗前后降压效果及对左室肥厚的影响。结果降压疗效54例中显效40例(74.0%),有效13例(24%),无效1例(1.8%),总有效率为99%。治疗前后血压变化差异有统计学意义(P0.01),咳嗽发生率仅1.8%;与治疗前相比较甘油三酯、空腹血糖下降(P0.05),血钾无明显变化(P0.05)。治疗前及治疗24 w后左心室结构及功能各项指标均明显下降(P0.01)。左室射血分数(LVEF)值、E/A比值明显增加(P0.01)。结论替米沙坦+HCTZ降压效果显著、且能逆转左心室肥厚,并且安全性高,耐受性好。     

小剂量氢氯噻嗪联合氨氯地平片治疗老年原发性高血压疗效观察

目的观察小剂量氢氯噻嗪联合氨氯地平治疗老年轻中度原发性高血压的疗效与安全性。方法将90例原发性高血压患者随机分成两组,A组给予氨氯地平5mg、氢氯噻嗪25mg口服,B组给予氨氯地平5mg、氢氯噻嗪12．5mg口服,共治疗8周。观察两组的血压、血生化指标的变化情况。结果两组治疗后血压均较治疗前明显下降（P〈0．01）,但两组间比较无统计学差异（P〉0．05）。A、B两组降压总有效率分别为88．9％、84．4％,降压达标率分别为66．7％、64．．4％,两组比较均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。A组低血钾发生率显著高于B组（P〈0．05）,两组其他不良反应发生率相似,生化指标比较无统计学意义。结论应用小剂量氢氯噻嗪联合氨氯地平治疗老年轻中度原发性高血压安全、有效。     

小剂量左旋氨氯地平、替米沙坦及氢氯噻嗪同时与不同时给药对血压晨峰的影响英俊岐,高春燕,陈丽曼,侯丽萍,娄满,李茹河北医科大学附属哈励逊国际和平医院老年病一科,河北 衡水 053000通信作者：英俊岐,email：yingjunqi01@sina.com

目的 探讨小剂量左旋氨氯地平、替米沙坦及氢氯噻嗪同时与不同时给药对轻中度高血压患者血压晨峰(MBPS)的影响。方法 选择我院门诊及住院的收缩压(SBD)﹤180mmHg,舒张压(DBP)91～109 mmHg,年龄>45岁,24h动态血压监测(ABDM)具有MBPS现象的高血压患者138例,男/女86:52,随机分为两组,Ⅰ组(不同时给药组,n=70)晨服替米沙坦40mg和氢氯噻嗪10mg,晚服左旋氨氯地平2.5mg;Ⅱ组(同时给药组,n=68)以上三种药物均晨服,所有病例治疗前及治疗8周后进行ABPM监测。结果 治疗8周后,Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组的24h SBD/DBP均较治疗前分别降低 17.34/10.26mmHg和16.64/10.42mmHg,日间SBD/DBP分别降低 15.48/9.86mmHg和17.36/10.28mmHg,均较治疗前明显降低(P＜0.01),两组间降低幅度差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);两组夜间SBD/DBP分别降低 21.52/11.22mmHg和15.82/10.14mmHg,均较治疗前明显降低(P＜0.01),Ⅰ组治疗后降低幅度较Ⅱ组也有差异(P＜0.05);治疗前与治疗8周后清晨收缩压差值(MSBPD)Ⅰ组分别为37.26±10.34mm Hg和23.14±7.82mm Hg,较治疗前显著降低(P＜0.01),Ⅱ组分别为37.48±10.32mm Hg和29.34±8.46mm Hg,较治疗前明显降低(P＜0.05),两组治疗后比较也有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 对于MBPS高血压患者,小剂量左旋氨氯地平、替米沙坦及氢氯噻嗪无论同时还是不同时给药均能有效地控制24h、日间和夜间血压,而不同时给药治疗夜间血压优于同时给药组,尤其在控制MBPS现象更明显。     

Effect of administration of low-dose irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide combined with levamlodipine at different times on the circadian rhythm of blood pressure and the levels of MMPs and TIMPs in non-dipper patients with grade 1 and 2 hypertension

This study aimed to probe the effects of low-dose irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide in combination with levamlodipine at different times on the circadian rhythm of blood pressure, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) levels in patients with non-dipper hypertension (NDH). In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 124 patients with NDH who visited our hospital between August 2018 and July 2021 were enrolled and divided into morning (62 patients) and night (62 patients) medication groups according to the random number table method. All patients received low-dose irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide combined with levamlodipine, with the morning medication group taking the medication between 7:00 and 10:00 and the night medication group taking the medication between 19:00 and 22:00 for 24 weeks. The effect of antihypertensive medication in both groups was measured, and changes in ambulatory blood pressure, blood pressure circadian rhythm, left ventricular structure, vascular endothelial function, MMPs, and TIMPs levels were observed before treatment initiation and after 24 weeks of treatment in both groups. The percentage of the dipper type was higher in the night medication group than in the morning medication group, while the percentage of the non-dipper type was lower in the morning medication group (p < .05). Low-dose irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide combined with levamlodipine at different times can effectively treat NDH, but bedtime dosing is more beneficial in reducing nocturnal blood pressure, reversing NDH, improving the circadian rhythm of blood pressure, left ventricular structure, regulating vascular endothelial function, increasing MMPs levels, and reducing TIMP levels.     

Effect of administration of low‐dose irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide combined with levamlodipine at different times on the circadian rhythm of blood pressure and the levels of MMPs and TIMPs in non‐dipper patients with grade 1 and 2 hypertension

This study aimed to probe the effects of low‐dose irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide in combination with levamlodipine at different times on the circadian rhythm of blood pressure, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) levels in patients with non‐dipper hypertension (NDH). In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 124 patients with NDH who visited our hospital between August 2018 and July 2021 were enrolled and divided into morning (62 patients) and night (62 patients) medication groups according to the random number table method. All patients received low‐dose irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide combined with levamlodipine, with the morning medication group taking the medication between 7:00 and 10:00 and the night medication group taking the medication between 19:00 and 22:00 for 24 weeks. The effect of antihypertensive medication in both groups was measured, and changes in ambulatory blood pressure, blood pressure circadian rhythm, left ventricular structure, vascular endothelial function, MMPs, and TIMPs levels were observed before treatment initiation and after 24 weeks of treatment in both groups. The percentage of the dipper type was higher in the night medication group than in the morning medication group, while the percentage of the non‐dipper type was lower in the morning medication group (p < .05). Low‐dose irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide combined with levamlodipine at different times can effectively treat NDH, but bedtime dosing is more beneficial in reducing nocturnal blood pressure, reversing NDH, improving the circadian rhythm of blood pressure, left ventricular structure, regulating vascular endothelial function, increasing MMPs levels, and reducing TIMP levels.     

杓型和非杓型高血压病患者动脉重构的改变

目的通过比较杓型与非杓型原发性高血压患者动脉重构的参数变化，探讨原发性高血压患者血压节律类型与动脉重构的相关性。方法选取1、2级原发性高血压患者128例，行动态血压监测，根据夜间平均动脉压下降10％以上或以下的标准分为杓型组（56例）与非杓型组（72例），应用彩色多普勒超声检测颈总动脉内膜中层厚度（IMT）、脉搏波速度测定仪同时检测颈动脉-桡动脉（C-RPWV）、颈动脉-股动脉（C-FPWV）的脉搏波速度，测定血清中内皮素1（ET-1）和一氧化氮（N0）浓度。比较两组间上述检测指标。结果非杓型组IMT较杓型组明显增厚；C-RPWV和C-FPWV在非杓型组明显高于杓型组；血清ET-1浓度在非杓型组明显高于杓型组，而NO浓度低于杓型组，两因子在两组间比较具有统计学差异。结论非杓型血压较杓型血压对动脉结构及功能的影响可能更明显。     

Efficacy and safety of standard dose triple combination of telmisartan 80 mg/amlodipine 5 mg/chlorthalidone 25 mg in primary hypertension: A randomized,double-blind,active-controlled,multicenter phase 3 trial

The authors evaluated the efficacy, safety, and characteristics of patients who respond well to standard dose triple combination therapy including chlorthalidone 25 mg with telmisartan 80 mg plus amlodipine 5 mg in hypertensive patients. This is a multicenter, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3, randomized trial. Patients are randomized to triple combination (telmisartan 40 mg/amlodipine 5 mg/chlorthalidone 12.5 mg, TEL/AML/CHTD group) or dual combination (telmisartan 40 mg/amlodipine 5 mg, TEL/AML group) treatment and then dose up titration to TEL 80/AML5/CHTD25mg and TEL80/AML5, respectively. The primary endpoint is the change of mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) at week 8. A Target BP achievement rate, a response rate, and the safety endpoints are also evaluated. Total 374 patients (mean age = 60.9 ± 10.7 years, male = 78.3%) were randomized to the study. The baseline MSSBPs/diastolic BPs were 149.9 ± 12.2/88.5 ± 10.4 mm Hg. After 8 weeks treatment, the change of MSSBPs at week 8 are −19.1 ± 14.9 mm Hg (TEL/AML/CHTD) and −11.4 ± 14.7 mm Hg (TEL/AML) (p < .0001). The achievement rates of target BP (53.8% vs. 37.8%, p = .0017) and responder rate (54.8% vs. 35.6%, p = .0001) at week 8 were significantly higher in TEL/AML/CHTD. There are no serious adverse event and no one discontinued medication due to adverse event. Among the TEL 80/AML5/CHTD25mg treatment group, patients of female or age ≥ 65 years old showed higher rate of target BP achievement than relatively young male. (61.4 vs. 46.8%, p = .042) Our study showed standard dose triple combination of telmisartan 80 mg/amlodipine 5 mg/chlorthalidone 25 mg is efficacious and safe in treatment of primary hypertension. Target BP achievement with triple therapy would be facilitated in female or old age.     

Combined splenocaval or mesocaval C shunt and portoazygous devascularization in the treatment of portal hypertension: analysis of 150 cases

BACKGROUND: Portal hypertension is a common disease and its major surgical therapeutic approaches include devascularization and shunting. This study was undertaken to investigate the effects of combined splenocaval or mesocaval C shunt and portoazygous devascularization (combined procedures) on portal hypertension. METHODS: The clinical data of 150 patients with portal hypertension who had undergone combined procedures at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from May1990 to May 2003 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean free portal pressure (FPP) was 25.6±1.83 mmHg, 18.0±2.07 mmHg and 18.4±2.19 mmHg before operation, after splenectomy plus splenocaval or mesocaval C shunt, and combined procedures, respectively. There was no operative death in all patients. The 1-7 year follow-up of 100 patients showed rebleeding in 3 patients, encephalopathy in 4, thrombosis of artificial vascular graft in 3, and dying from liver failure in 2. CONCLUSIONS: The combined procedures can not only decrease portal pressure but also preserve hepatic blood flow to some extent. It may be one of the best choices for treating portal hypertension in China.     

Efficacy and safety of Shugan Jieyu capsule in the treatment of essential hypertension with insomnia,anxiety or depression: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Shugan Jieyu capsule can reduce blood pressure and improve its concomitant symptoms. However, it is not widely used in clinic because of its incomplete understanding of its nature. There are many reports on the clinical trials of Shugan Jieyu capsule in the treatment of essential hypertension with insomnia, anxiety or depression in recent years. However, the lack of systematic review and meta-analysis has not provided effective evidence. As a consequence, we provide a protocol to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Shugan Jieyu capsule (SJC) in the treatment of essential hypertension (EH) with insomnia, anxiety or depression.Methods:The search time range of Cochrane Library, PubMed, excerpt Database (EMBASE), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and Wanfang Database (WanFang), was searched by computer from the establishment of the database to December 31, 2020. In the meanwhile, the list of references and related reviews were checked. The data were extracted by 2 evaluators independently, and the literature quality was evaluated according to Cochrane manual 4.2.2. In addition, CochraneRevman5.3 software was used for heterogeneity test, meta-analysis, publication bias analysis and GRADE3.6 evidence quality classification system evaluation related statistical data.Results:This study intends to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SJC in the treatment of EH from many aspects, including changes in blood pressure [systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP)], effective rate of blood pressure reduction, improvement rate of concomitant symptoms and adverse reactions.Conclusion:The conclusion of systematic review intends to provide evidence for judging that SJC is an effective intervention for EH patients with insomnia, anxiety and depression.PROSPERO registration number:PROSPERO CRD 42021219704.     

Efficacy and safety of renal denervation for the management of arterial hypertension: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized,sham‐controlled,catheter‐based trials

Despite the availability of a numerous antihypertensive agents, hypertension treatment and control rates remain low in many countries. The role of the sympathetic nervous system has long been recognized, but recent sham control renal denervation studies demonstrated conflicting results. In this reviewe paper, the authors performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to examine outcomes of sham‐controlled studies utilizing new technologies and procedures. Six published randomized, sham‐controlled studies were included in this meta‐analysis. Of those, three trials used the first‐generation radiofrequency renal denervation device and technique and the other three used second‐generation devices and techniques. In total, 981 patients with hypertension were randomized in all 6 trials to undergo renal denervation (n = 585) or sham procedure (n = 396). Overall, renal denervation resulted in a decrease of 24‐hours systolic ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) by 3.62 mm Hg (95% CI: −5.28‐−1.96; I² = 0%), compared to sham procedure (GRADE: low). Renal denervation also reduced daytime systolic ABP by 5.51 mm Hg (95% CI: −7.79‐−3.23; I² = 0%), compared to sham procedure but not nighttime systolic ABP. Office systolic blood pressure was reduced by 5.47 mm Hg (95% CI −8.10‐−2.84; I² = 0%), compared to sham control. Further analysis demonstrated that second‐generation devices were effective in reducing blood pressure, whereas the first‐generation devices were not. These results indicate that effective renal denervation can result in significant and clinically meaningful blood pressure reduction. The second‐generation devices provide better renal nerve ablation.