The Remission of Post-Transplant Nephrotic Syndrome Clinicopathologic Characterization

Among 67 renal transplant recipients with nephrotic syndrome (NS), nine episodes were reversible in eight patients. Biopsies showed minimal-change disease, focal segmental membranous glomerulonephritis and acute glomerulitis, IgA nephropathy and acute glomerulitis or thrombotic microangiopathy, and chronic transplant nephropathy with or without acute glomerulitis. NS developed 1-4 months post transplant in the four patients with minimal-change disease, but later (33-151 months) in the others. At onset, serum creatinine was normal or elevated. Treatment included calcium-channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or both, together with routine antirejection therapy. Remission was achieved 4-12 months after onset, when renal function remained normal in four, improved in four, and worsened in one. At last follow-up, six patients still had remission and functional grafts. One lost graft to chronic transplant nephropathy while NS remained in remission. In the remaining patient, proteinuria, which was due to chronic transplant glomerulopathy unrelated to the initial minimal-change disease-associated NS, recurred 50 months post transplant. Remission of post-transplant NS is possible. It is often associated with minimal-change diseases and less frequently with other glomerular lesions, including acute glomerulitis. Reversible post-transplant NS does not have an adverse effect on the renal allografts.     

Post-transplant nephrotic syndrome: A comprehensive clinicopathologic study

BACKGROUND: Post-transplant (Tx) nephrotic syndrome (NS) is not well defined. METHODS: Seventy-four renal transplant recipients with NS were studied. RESULTS: Biopsies showed chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in 31 patients; recurrent glomerular disease (GN) in 15, de novo GN in 18, and undetermined GN in 9. NS developed 0.25 to 384 months post-Tx and was treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) in 18 patients; calcium channel blockers in 25; or both drugs in 31. NS remitted in 24% of cases 2 to 28 months after onset, and this persisted in all except 3 patients. The remission rate was lowest (9%) for CAN and highest (47%) for de novo GN. Compared with persistent NS, those with remission showed higher prevalence of de novo GN (53% vs. 17%), lower prevalence of CAN (18% vs. 50%), earlier onset of NS (39 vs. 59 months), lower serum SCr at onset (2.3 vs. 2.9 mg/dL), and higher incidence of treatment with ACE or ARB. The 5-year graft loss rates for CAN, recurrent and de novo GN were 57%, 36%, and 23%, respectively. Compared with the functioning grafts, the failed grafts showed higher prevalence of CAN (60% vs. 16%), lower prevalence of de novo GN (12% vs. 46%), earlier onset of NS (47 vs 65 months post-Tx), higher serum SCr at onset (3.3 vs. 2.0 mg/dL), lower prevalence of remission of NS (5% vs. 48%), and higher proteinuria at follow-up (5.1 vs. 2.5 g/day). Graft survival improved with NS remission (88% vs. 18%). CONCLUSION: Post-Tx NS displays distinctive clinicopathologic features with pathogenetic and therapeutic implications.     

A rare case of vascular rejection in a renal transplant recipient with nephrotic range proteinuria

Abstract:  In the post-cyclosporine A era, it has been reported that acute rejection after kidney transplantation is commonly revealed as an asymptomatic increase in the serum creatinine level. Nephrotic range proteinuria is observed in patients with recurrent or de novo glomerulonephritis, or with chronic transplant nephropathy and glomerulopathy in the late phase. Acute rejection occurring with nephrotic range proteinuria without a rise of serum creatinine has been rarely reported. Here, we report a rare case of vascular rejection in a renal transplant recipient with nephrotic range proteinuria. A 34-yr-old male renal transplant recipient presented with acute vascular rejection and early-onset nephrotic syndrome. Severe nephrotic range proteinuria was detected with a minimally elevated level of serum creatinine. Biopsy showed severe glomerulitis and vasculitis, which was relieved by conversion of the immunosupressant regimen. Severe proteinuria was a sign of acute vascular rejection with severe glomerulitis and vasculitis. Careful observation to ensure maintenance of immunosuppression is necessary in such cases.     

Combined Percutaneous Mechanical and Chemical Thrombectomy for Renal Vein Thrombosis in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Renal vein thrombosis occurring after the immediate post-transplant period often leads to loss of the transplant organ. We report two cases of renal vein thrombosis in the setting of de novo membranous nephropathy occurring 5 and 26 months post-transplantation. Both cases were treated with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy and localized catheter-directed thrombolysis with resolution of clot burden, and regained kidney function after thrombolysis without subsequent thromboses. Percutaneous mechanical thrombolysis can be safely done in renal transplant recipients and should be considered in patients with renal vein thrombosis beyond the immediate post-operative period in order to minimize exposure to systemic thrombolysis.     

De novo development of membranous nephropathy in cadaver renal allografts.

Glomerulonephritis in transplant recipients often reflects recurrence of the immunopathogenetic mechanism causing the original renal disease. Membranous nephropathy (MN), a progressive immune complex mediated glomerular disease and the commonest cause of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in adults, has been virtually unreported in transplant recipients. Two cases are reported here of typical MN (by clinical, light, immunofluorescent and electron microscopic criteria) developing de novo in the transplants of patients whose original diseases were anti-GBM nephritis and focal glomerular sclerosis. NM developed following episodes of viral hepatitis and renal infarction respectively. Possible mechanisms by which this lesion might develop in these patients are investigated and discussed. Chronic immune complex nephropathy (MN) can develop de novo in immunosuppressed transplant recipients apparently initiated by events in the post-transplant period.     

Proteinuria in transplant patients associated with sirolimus

Sirolimus (SRL) is a potent immunosuppressive drug used in organ transplantation for prophylaxis of acute allograft rejection. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to SRL has become an important alternative in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy. Recently, some reports have described the appearance of proteinuria after the use of SRL. The aim of the present study was to describe the incidence of proteinuria in transplant recipients receiving SRL in our transplant center. We studied 78 patients receiving SRL either de novo or after conversion. Eighteen transplant recipients (23.1%) developed proteinuria after SRL treatment. Proteinuria was diagnosed at 11.2 +/- 2.1 months after the initiation of SRL; in eight patients (44.4%) it occurred in the first 6 months. The mean value of proteinuria was 2.6 +/- 0.6 g/24 hours. In 5 patients (27.8%), proteinuria reached nephrotic levels, and in 13 patients (72.2%) was associated with edema. Renal allograft biopsies were performed before conversion to SRL, and a new biopsy, after the appearance of proteinuria. The light microscopy of biopsies performed after the onset of proteinuria showed no specific glomerular changes, except in 2 cases wherein the diagnosis was focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Immunofluorescence was negative in all cases. In conclusion, in this study proteinuria was observed in 21.3% of patients receiving SRL therapy either as de novo protocol or after conversion to SRL. Proteinuria occurred early after the initiation of SRL therapy and in these cases, withdrawal of SRL was associated with reversion of proteinuria.     

Recurrent nephrotic syndrome after living-related renal transplantation resistant to plasma exchange: report of two cases

Abstract:  We encountered two patients of recurrent nephrotic syndrome (NS) after renal transplantation that was resistant to plasma exchange (PEX). Case 1 was a 34-year-old man with a living-related renal transplant for type-I membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) related end-stage renal disease (ESRD). He developed overt proteinuria 7 months post-transplant and presented with NS 5 months later. Biopsy of the transplant kidney revealed recurrent type I MPGN, but no features of acute rejection (AR) or chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). He was treated with cyclophosphamide (CP), oral prednisolone (40 mg/d), an anti-platelet agent, heparin sulfate, and PEX, but the nephrotic state persisted and renal function was deteriorated. He recommenced hemodialysis 3 yr and 9 months after renal transplant. Case 2 was a 47-year-old male who underwent living-related renal transplant for ESRD due to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). He presented with proteinuria shortly after renal transplantation. He also had frequent episodes of AR. Graft biopsy revealed recurrent FSGS. Treatment of pulse methylprednisolone and PEX was transiently effective, but NS relapsed shortly after PEX. Graft biopsy at our hospital showed features of CAN with moderate interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, presence of intraglomerular foam cells but no segmental sclerosis. Treatment with 12 courses of low-density lipoprotein apheresis (LDL-A) reduced proteinuria from 9.6 to 2.0 g/d, and incomplete remission has been maintained for more than 1 yr after LDL-A with slowly progressive renal dysfunction. Despite recent therapeutic advances, including the use of immunosuppressants and PEX, treatment of recurrent disease remains difficult. The LDL-A might be useful in cases with recurrent FSGS resistant to PEX.     

Nephrotic Range Proteinuria in Renal Transplantation: Clinical and Histologic Correlates in a 10-year Retrospective Study

Introduction

There is a high incidence of nephrotic proteinuria in renal transplant recipients, which is an accurate predictor of graft loss. Despite this, its histologic correlates and prognostic implications are still not well characterized. We assessed the clinical and histological correlates of kidney transplantation patients with nephrotic range proteinuria.

Proteinuria after conversion to sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients: impact of pre‐existing proteinuria,graft function,and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin‐receptor antagonists

Marx C, Busch M, Ott U, Gerth J, Wolf G. Proteinuria after conversion to sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients: impact of pre‐existing proteinuria, graft function, and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin‐receptor antagonists.
Clin Transplant 2009 DOI:10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2009.01142.x.
© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Proteinuria is a known side effect of therapy with sirolimus. The effect of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin‐receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB ) on sirolimus‐associated proteinuria has not yet been assessed. Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort study of renal transplant patients treated with sirolimus (n = 55) was performed. Results: Of 55 patients, 24 (44%) had no proteinuria (<0.15 g/d) prior to conversion. Of 24 patients, 11 (46%) showed de novo proteinuria >0.15 g/d after 12 months, only 2 developed proteinuria > 1 g/d. The total number of proteinuria >1 g/d after 12 months including patients with pre‐existing proteinuria >1 g/d (n = 3) was seven of 55 patients (13%). Multivariate regression analysis revealed pre‐existing proteinuria > 0.15 g/d and reduced glomerular filtration rate as independent predictors for the development of proteinuria after conversion to sirolimus. Conclusion: Reduced glomerular filtration rate and pre‐existing proteinuria but not therapy with ACEI/ARB are independent predictors for proteinuria after conversion to sirolimus. Treatment with ACEI/ARB did not reduce pre‐existing proteinuria after conversion except in single cases with severe proteinuria.     

Pretransplant Interferon Prevents Hepatitis C Virus-Associated Glomerulonephritis in Renal Allografts by HCV-RNA Clearance

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of pretransplant interferon administration on the occurrence of post-transplant de novo glomerulonephritis in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive renal allografts. From December 1992 to December 2000, 78 HCV-positive patients received a renal allograft in our unit. Fifteen out of 78 received pretransplant interferon for 1 year. Hepatitis C virus was investigated by serology and qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Hepatitis C virus-related de novo glomerulonephritis (membranoproliferative or membranous) was suggested by proteinuria (>1.5 g/24 h) and/or microhematuria and always diagnosed by renal biopsy. Of 15 HCV-positive recipients who received pretransplant interferon, 10 (67%) became HCV-RNA negative at the time of transplantation and only one out of the 15 (6.7%) developed de novo glomerulonephritis (this patient was HCV-RNA positive at transplantation). Among non-interferon-treated allograft recipients, 28.7% had negative HCV-RNA and 12 out of 63 (19%) developed de novo glomerulonephritis (9, membranoproliferative; 3 membranous), all 12 having positive HCV-RNA at transplantation (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, pretransplant interferon may reduce the occurrence of post-transplant HCV-related de novo glomerulonephritis. Our results suggest that the indication for pretransplant interferon should be extended to treat all HCV-RNA positive candidates for renal transplantation.     

Segmental glomerulosclerosis in IgA nephropathy after renal transplantation: relationship with proteinuria and therapeutic response to enalapril

INTRODUCTION: Although graft dysfunction has been increasingly reported in post-transplant IgA nephropathy (Tx-IgAN), intragraft morphological changes have been largely overlooked. We evaluated glomerular changes in Tx-IgAN to identify the histological features pertaining to significant proteinuria and therapeutic response to enalapril. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four renal allograft biopsies, diagnosed as Tx-IgAN at a median of 46 months after transplantation, were the subject of the study. In 10 patients, glomerular morphometry was performed. In 14 patients who have been treated with enalapril for more than 12 months, we correlated the therapeutic response to enalapril with allograft histology. RESULTS: No uniform pattern was found in the glomeruli of Tx-IgAN. The glomerular mesangium was mostly indistinct. Interstitial fibrosis was negative or mild in 88.9%. By morphometry, the glomerular tuft areas and mesangial areas were significantly larger in Tx-IgAN than those of the normal native kidney (p < 0.05), but were not different from transplant cases without glomerulonephritis. Proteinuria of >/=1 g/24 h was correlated with glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis and interstitial inflammation at time of biopsy (p < 0.005). The presence of segmental sclerosis (SS) correlated well with the amount of 24-h proteinuria (p < 0.001). After treatment with enalapril, the amount of proteinuria reduced in 64.3%. Therapeutic response to enalapril tended to be less effective in patients having SS (28.6 versus 71.4%), but this finding did not reach a statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Significant proteinuria was associated with advanced chronic injury, especially with the presence of SS in Tx-IgAN, but anti-proteinuric effect of enalapril was not affected by graft histology. It remains to be clarified whether glomerular mesangial expansion plays a role in graft dysfunction in a subset of Tx-IgAN showing prominent mesangial changes.     

De novo minimal change disease

Beyond the acute posttransplantation period, glomerular causes of proteinuria in the renal allograft include recurrent glomerulopathy, transplant-associated entities, and de novo disease. We present a case of de novo minimal change disease with reversible acute renal failure occurring 2.5 years posttransplantation in a 56-year-old man. The cause of end-stage renal disease in the native kidney was membranous glomerulopathy. De novo minimal change disease in the renal allograft is an extremely rare entity requiring stringent clinical-pathological criteria for diagnosis. Many of the cases previously reported as de novo minimal change disease fail to meet these criteria. We review the eight reported cases that appear to fulfill a strict definition of minimal change disease in the context of the current report.     

FTY720 versus MMF with Cyclosporine in de novo Renal Transplantation: A 1-Year, Randomized Controlled Trial in Europe and Australasia

FTY720 is a novel immunomodulator investigated in de novo renal transplantation and other therapeutic areas including multiple sclerosis. This 1-year multicenter, randomized, phase III study in 668 de novo renal transplant patients compared FTY720 2.5 mg plus full-dose cyclosporine (FDC) or FTY720 5.0 mg plus reduced-dose cyclosporine (RDC), with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus FDC. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite incidence of first treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or premature study discontinuation at month 12. Primary efficacy with FTY720 2.5 mg and MMF (32.4% and 30.2%; p = NS), plus mortality and BPAR incidence, were comparable. Patients receiving FTY720 5.0 mg plus RDC were discontinued from treatment due to increased risk of acute rejection (primary endpoint incidence 47.3%). FTY720 was associated with lower creatinine clearance (month 12: 53.1, 56.0 vs. 65.1 mL/min; p < 0.001) and more macular edema cases (2.2% and 1.3% vs. 0%), whereas cytomegalovirus infections were higher with MMF (6.2% and 10.6% vs. 18.1% p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0139, respectively). FTY720 2.5 mg provided comparable rejection prophylaxis over 12 months versus MMF; however, FTY720 5.0 mg did not support a 50% reduction in cyclosporine exposure. The cause of macular edema cases and lower creatinine clearance with FTY720 in de novo transplantation needs further investigation.     

Comparison of histopathological characteristics of allograft biopsy between responder and non-responder to antiproteinuric effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)

Abstract:  Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) has become recognized as agents that have renoprotective effects in the treatment of progressive renal diseases including post-transplant kidneys. Previously we demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of ACEI treatment on the hypertensive proteinuric post-transplant patients ( N  = 10) who had been followed up for 12 months. However, not all patients show good response in urinary protein reduction. We aimed to analyse the histopathological factor(s) affecting the responsiveness of proteinuria to ACEI treatment. Fourteen post-transplant patients with proteinuria who were treated with ACEI and underwent allograft biopsy were analysed. Eight patients showed 50% or more reduction in proteinuria (responder). The other 6 patients showed less (< 50%) reduction in proteinuria (non-responder). There was no difference in clinical characteristics (BP, renal function, donor age, recipient body mass index), dietary sodium or protein intake, and diuretic use between the two groups. As a histopathological characteristic, glomerular size in responder group was significantly larger than that in non-responder group. This suggests that the large glomerular size at least partly contributes to the responsiveness in urinary protein reduction to ACEI treatment in kidney allograft recipients with proteinuria.     

Calcium Oxalate Deposition in Renal Allografts: Morphologic Spectrum and Clinical Implications

Many aspects of calcium oxalate (CaOx) deposition in renal transplant biopsies are not known. Review of all renal transplant biopsies performed in a 7-year period showed that CaOx deposition could be classified into three groups. Group I: Seven biopsies within a month post-transplant displayed rare CaOx foci against a background of acute tubular necrosis or acute cell-mediated rejection. At follow-up, five grafts functioned well and two failed due to chronic allograft nephropathy. CaOx in this context was an incidental finding secondary to a sudden excretion of an end-stage renal disease-induced increased body burden of CaOx. Group II: Two biopsies performed 2 and 10 months post-transplant showed rare CaOx foci against a background of chronic allograft nephropathy, leading to graft loss. CaOx in this context reflected nonspecific parenchymal deposition due to chronic renal failure regardless of causes. Group III: One biopsy with recurrent PH1 characterized by marked CaOx deposition associated with severe tubulointerstitial injury and graft loss 6 months post-transplant. There were two previously reported cases in which CaOx deposition in the renal allografts was due the antihypertensive drug naftidrofuryl oxalate or increased intestinal absorption of CaOx. CaOx deposition in renal allografts can be classified in different categories with distinctive morphologic features and clinical implications.     

De novo gastrointestinal tumours after renal transplantation: role of CMV and EBV viruses

The development of new and more effective immunosuppressive agents has provided long-term survival for transplant recipients, thereby increasing the risk of de novo malignancy in chronic immunocompromised hosts. While de novo post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases and skin cancer has been shown to have an increased incidence in long-term surviving solid organ transplant recipients, the association with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is controversial. Over 12 yr, 20 patients (5%) out of 395 renal transplant recipients developed 23 de novo tumours; 11 skin cancer and 12 non-skin cancer. Four patients (1%) developed de novo tumours of the GI tract (three colon, and one gastric cancer). Immediately after tumour's diagnosis, immunosuppressive therapy was reduced; all patients were shifted from cyclosporine to Rapamicine within 30 d. The tumour was surgically resected with curative intent in three cases, while one patient had only palliative surgery because of metastatic disease. The post-operative courses was uneventful. All patients maintained normal graft function. However, three out of four patients (75%) died of progression of the neoplasm, within a median time from the diagnosis of 12 months. Further, we investigated a possible correlations between de novo GI cancer and HCV, HBV status, infections, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation, episodes of rejection, and blood transfusions. All cases with GI de novo cancers reported in this paper developed CMV and EBV reactivation within three months after transplantation. Thereafter we suggest a closer follow-up for de novo GI cancer in renal transplants with early CMV and EBV reactivation in order to avoid delayed diagnosis.     

Pamidronate used to attenuate post-renal transplant bone loss is not associated with renal dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Pamidronate is a second-generation bisphosphonate that has been used to attenuate post-renal transplant bone loss, but its effect on the function of the renal allograft is unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the long-term renal function in 57 subjects who had participated in a prospective, randomized clinical trial using pamidronate to attenuate bone loss in the renal transplant recipient. METHODS: Thirty subjects (PAM) received intravenous pamidronate, 60 mg at baseline post-transplant and 30 mg in months 1, 2, 3 and 6 post-transplant, while 27 subjects (CON) did not receive pamidronate. We followed renal function, need for renal replacement therapy following transplant rejection, and mortality for 3 years following the start of the original study. RESULTS: PAM did not have increased incidence of renal dysfunction or mortality compared with CON at any time point during the 3 years of follow-up. The incidence of proteinuria was also not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The prophylactic use of pamidronate in the above doses to attenuate bone loss in renal transplant recipients is not associated with higher incidence of renal dysfunction or mortality in a 3 year follow-up study. These findings may support the use of bisphosphonates in the treatment of early renal transplant-related bone loss.     

FTY720 and everolimus in de novo renal transplant patients at risk for delayed graft function: results of an exploratory one-yr multicenter study

Abstract:  This exploratory, multicenter, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of FTY720, as a part of an immunosuppressive regimen, in combination with everolimus and steroids in de novo renal transplant recipients at increased risk of delayed graft function (DGF). Patients received FTY720 (5 mg) and everolimus (4 mg) 2–12 h pre-transplantation, followed by 2.5 mg/d FTY720 and concentration-controlled everolimus (4–8 ng/mL) post-transplant for 12 months. Induction therapy was prohibited. After enrollment of 56 of the planned 200 patients between 2000 and 2002, the recruitment was terminated. The primary endpoint, rate of graft loss, or death at three months was 15.4% and the biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was 42.3%. Death or graft loss at 12 months in the DGF and non-DGF arms was 36.0% and 25.9%, respectively. The mean estimated creatinine clearance at three months was 63 and 55 mL/min in the non-DGF and DGF groups, respectively, while at 12 months it was 56 mL/min in both the groups. Although there was no comparator arm, the results from this exploratory study (compared with data from other phases II and III trials) indicated no apparent benefits of FTY720-based regimens for prevention of acute rejection and preservation of renal function in renal transplant recipients at high risk of DGF.     

Reduced-exposure cyclosporine is safe and efficacious in de novo renal transplant recipients treated with enteric-coated mycophenolic acid and basiliximab

BACKGROUND: The lower limit of exposure to calcineurin inhibitors has not yet been established in de novo renal transplant patients receiving mycophenolic acid therapy with basiliximab. METHODS: A 12-month, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial was carried out in which de novo renal transplant patients received enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium, cyclosporine microemulsion, steroids and basiliximab. Patients were randomized to receive standard-exposure (n = 45) or reduced-exposure (n = 44) cyclosporine, based on differing C2 target ranges, after the first month post-transplant. RESULTS: Cyclosporine exposure gradually increased over the first month and was lower than previously recommended. Mean calculated creatinine clearance (primary end-point) was similar in the standard-exposure and reduced-exposure groups at month 6 (55.3+/-3.2 ml/min and 61.5+/-3.7 ml/min respectively, n.s.). There were 4 deaths but no death-censored graft losses, resulting in 95.5% patient and graft survival at one year in both groups. At 6 and 12 months, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 17.8% and 17.8% in the standard-exposure group, and 13.6% and 15.9% in the reduced-exposure group. Adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Exploratory analyses could not identify a lower limit for the optimal CsA exposure range, but results suggested that high exposure at one year was associated with deteriorating renal function. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium with reduced-exposure cyclosporine, steroids and basiliximab induction has an excellent therapeutic effect and is safe in de novo kidney transplant recipients. Lower C2 targets than previously recommended, particularly early post-transplant, do not appear to be associated with compromised efficacy.     

Risk analysis for deterioration of renal function after pancreas alone transplant

The risk of progression to renal replacement after pancreas transplant alone (PTA) is a concern in patients with pre-transplant estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 70 mL/min/1.73 m(2). This is a retrospective, single-center risk analysis of potential factors affecting renal function after PTA. Twenty-four patients, transplanted over a three-yr period, with functioning pancreatic grafts at the study's end point were included. High tacrolimus levels (> 12 mg/dL) at six months post-transplant was the only independent risk factor identifying a substantial decline in native renal function by Cox regression analysis (HR = 14.300, CI = 1.271-160.907, p = 0.031). The presence of severe pre-transplant proteinuria (urine Pr/Cr ≥ 100 mg/mmol) marginally failed to reach significance (p = 0.056). Low eGFR levels alone (≤ 45 and ≤ 40 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) at the time of transplant did not correlate with substantial decline in renal function. Our data suggest that PTA is a justifiable therapy for patients with hypoglycemia unawareness or other life-threatening diabetic complications, even in those with borderline renal function, provided that they do not suffer from severe proteinuria and appropriate monitoring and tailoring of immunosuppression is ensured.