Endoscopic therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Endoscopic therapies aimed to reduce gastroesophageal reflux have gained an enormous enthusiasm during the last 5 years when several of them were approved by the regulatory agencies and released on the market. These novel therapies comprise 3 types of techniques: injection/bulking, plicating/suturing and radiofrequency thermal injury. Open-labelled trials performed on proton pump inhibitors-responding patients with typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms have shown an improvement in reflux symptoms during short term follow-up. Longer-term data are now available and show disappointing results with partial-thickness plications of the cardia. Randomized sham-controlled trials, which are essential to proof the efficacy of GERD endotherapy because of a known high placebo effect in the management of GERD patients, have been conducted, one with radiofrequency and one with polymer injection, and have confirmed the clinical efficacy of both techniques, although the clinical benefit was less impressive than suggested in open-labelled trials. While mechanistic studies have suggested that the compliance of the gastroesophageal junction might be altered by GERD endotherapy, objective assessment of acid reflux with ambulatory pH-metry has shown, however, minimal or no modification by the treatment. Concerns about the safety of these new techniques have raised when complications were reported as the number of treated cases increased. Currently, no definite indication is established for each technique, but numerous potential indications exist and should be addressed in the setting of carefully designed clinical trials. Physicians should be patient and wait for proof of efficacy and safety of these techniques before using them in their clinical practice. Specific and extensive warning should be obtained before starting clinical application. The present review aims to provide a comprehensive and critical view of endoscopic therapy in GERD management.     

Endoscopic anti-reflux therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease has an increasing incidence and prevalence worldwide. A significant proportion of patients have a suboptimal response to proton pump inhibitors or are unwilling to take lifelong medication due to concerns about long-term adverse effects. Endoscopic anti-reflux therapies offer a minimally invasive option for patients unwilling to undergo surgical treatment or take lifelong medication. The best candidates are those with a good response to proton pump inhibitors and without a significant sliding hiatal hernia. Transoral incisionless fundoplication and nonablative radiofrequency are the techniques with the largest body of evidence and that have been tested in several randomized clinical trials. Band-assisted ligation techniques, anti-reflux mucosectomy, anti-reflux mucosal ablation, and new plication devices have yielded promising results in recent noncontrolled studies. Nonetheless, the role of endoscopic procedures remains controversial due to limited long-term and comparative data, and no consensus exists in current clinical guidelines. This review provides an updated summary focused on the patient selection, technical details, clinical success, and safety of current and future endoscopic anti-reflux techniques.     

胃食管反流病的内镜治疗现状

胃食管反流病(gastroesophageal reflux disease．GERD)是指胃或十二指肠内容物反流入食管，引起并发症或明显地损害了病人的生活质量。主要表现为烧心、反酸或食物反流，可引起食管糜烂、溃疡、出血、狭窄等。GERD非常常见，西方国家约10％的人患有此病，老年人约1／4患有GERD。我国该病的发病率具体不详，京沪二地调查约6％的人患有GERD。GERD的     

Endoscopic therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review

Endoscopic therapy has emerged as an alternative for patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who are seeking a non-pharmacologic, non-surgical intervention. To date, there are 3 basic categories of these endoscopic options: radiofrequency ablation, endoscopic suturing and endoscopic injection. Although the pivotal clinical studies to date have consistently demonstrated efficacy for defined endpoints of symptom control, GERD health related quality of life and discontinuance of acid secretory medications, depending on the therapy, there has been less consistent improvement in objective parameters of pH control and lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Although the data for these procedures has been favorable, extrapolation to justify a more widespread clinical use has been limited by the relative lack of controlled sham studies-although these are currently underway for all of the available therapies. Appropriate patient selection for endoscopic GERD therapy is critical and at present these therapies have the best clinical outcome data in patients who are responsive to therapy with a proton pump inhibitor. The risk/benefit profile, long term durability and cost effectiveness should be considered in all patients being considered when evaluating each of the endoscopic therapies for GERD.     

Endoscopic therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) accounts for a substantial degree of medical resource utilization and is a common indication for outpatient physician visits. The primary therapy for GERD has been proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Equally effective and reasonably safe for GERD is surgical therapy, specifically, laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Medical therapy is used initially, with surgery reserved for patients with refractory symptoms despite optimal medical management, to avoid the added risks of abdominal surgery. As such, there has been considerable investigation into minimally invasive, endoscopic therapies for patients who respond to PPI, but would prefer to avoid long-term medication use. Here, we discuss the anatomical and physiological barriers that must be overcome by such devices. We further review the data on currently available endoscopic devices. Despite considerable interest and resources in developing an effective endoscopic therapy for GERD, none of the currently available technologies have demonstrated an ability to overcome the pathophysiological hurdles present in most patients with GERD. Furthermore, well-designed trials have not demonstrated adequate clinical efficacy for these endoscopic devices. As such, despite a growing need for an intermediate therapy between PPI and fundoplication, at present there is not adequate evidence to recommend endoscopic therapy for patients with GERD.     

Endoscopic therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Although medical and surgical treatments are available for gastroesophageal reflux disease, endoscopic therapies for this condition are relatively new. This review describes the principles behind such treatments as well as the individual procedures themselves, focusing on mechanisms of action, safety and tolerability, and efficacy in animal and human clinical trials. Future trends in endoscopic therapy are discussed.     

Endoscopic therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review

The high prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Western societies has accelerated the need for new modalities of treatment. Currently, medical and surgical therapies are widely accepted among patients and physicians. The minimally invasive treatment revolution, however, has stimulated several new endoscopic techniques for GERD. Up to now, the data is limited and further studies are necessary to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the various endoscopic techniques to medical and laparoscopic management of GERD. This systematic review reports the efficacy and durability of various endoscopic therapies for GERD whilst the potential for widespread use of these techniques is also discussed. Despite the limited number of studies and remarkable differences between various trials, strict criteria were used for the pooled data presented and an effort was made to avoid bias by including only studies that used off-antisecretory medication scoring as baseline and intent to treat.     

Endoscopic therapies of gastroesophageal reflux disease

The high prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Western societies has accelerated the need for new modalities of treatment. Currently, medical and surgical therapies are widely accepted among patients and physicians. New potent antisecretory drugs and the development of minimally invasive surgery for the management of GERD are at present the pivotal and largely accepted approaches to treatment. The minimally invasive treatment revolution, however, has stimulated several new endoscopic techniques for GERD. Up to now, the data is limited and further studies are necessary to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the various endoscopic techniques to medical and laparoscopic management of GERD. New journal articles and abstracts are continuously being published. The Food and Drug Administration has approved 3 modalities, thus gastroenterologists and surgeons are beginning to apply these techniques. Further trials and device refinements will assist clinicians. This article will present an overview of the various techniques that are currently on study. This review will report the efficacy and durability of various endoscopic therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The potential for widespread use of these techniques will also be discussed. Articles and abstracts published in English on this topic were retrieved from Pubmed. Due to limited number of studies and remarkable differences between various trials, strict criteria were not used for the pooled data presented, however, an effort was made to avoid bias by including only studies that used off-PPI scoring as baseline and intent to treat.     

Endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

"Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a chronic illness with a wide spectrum of symptoms that can significantly affect people's quality of life and increase the risk of complications, including cancer. Gastroesophageal reflux disease has been primarily treated with anti-secretory medications and, when needed, surgery. However, caveats to this approach include long-term medications, side effects, drug-interaction, cost, and the morbidity and mortality associated with surgery. Endoscopic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease offers a safe, effective and less invasive alternative to medications and surgery. There are different endoscopic therapies that include suturing, application of radiofrequency, injection of polymer, and placement of prostheses. The available data on these therapies is here discussed".     

On-demand therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease

The following pages summarize the proceedings of a symposium held in May 2006 on the emerging role of on-demand therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Medical therapy for GERD has undergone significant change in recent years with the advent of effective, but expensive, antisecretory agents. On-demand (patient-driven) therapy is attractive to payers and patients, because it appears to be both cost-effective and convenient. Many individuals appear to accept occasional symptomatic breakthrough in exchange for personal control of their disease. On-demand therapy should be distinguished from intermittent therapy, which is either patient- or physician-driven, but which requires intermittent episodes of continuous therapy followed by discontinuation until symptoms recur. Proton pump inhibitors appear to be effective on-demand agents despite theoretical pharmacodynamic limitations for this class of drug. The available data support the use of on-demand therapy for GERD in uninvestigated reflux disease, nonerosive reflux disease, and possibly mild esophagitis as well. On-demand therapy should not be considered for patients with severe esophagitis.     

Endoscopic management of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease

Objective: Despite the therapeutic and surgical interventions for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), yet the high cost and the post-operative complications had led to a significant socioeconomic burden. The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) in the management of refractory GERD.

Methods: A total of 150 patients with refractory GERD were assigned to an EBL group (banding was done at four quadrants just at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) (n?=?75) or to a control group (optimized dose of PPI, n?=?75). Follow-up for both groups by upper GI endoscopy to evaluate the site of the Z line from the incisors, the width of the GEJ and the coaptation of GEJ around the endoscope on retroflection. PH monitoring was performed every 3 months with GERD- QoL assessment monthly for 1 year.

Results: In EBL group; 58 patients (77.3%) needed 1 session, 17 patients (22.7%) needed 2 sessions. 4 rubber bands were utilized in 44 patients (58.7%), 3 rubber bands in 31 patients (41.3%). Follow-up for 1 year revealed a highly significant improvement of the GERD- QoL score, the site of Z line with significant reduction of reflux episodes and symptom index when compared to the medical treatment group. In EBL group; there were no major adverse events including bleeding, post band ulcers, stenosis at one year follow up.

Conclusion: The current study provides a novel endoscopic intervention to treat refractory GERD, which is safe, cost-effective, with no major adverse effects at one year follow up.     

Endoscopic therapies for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder with rising incidence worldwide and very high medical costs to society. The medical management of the disease i.e. lifestyle modifications and proton pump inhibitors reaches excellent results in most cases, but it needs to be continued, lifelong; the real cure of the disease is nowadays laparoscopic fundoplication, which is effective and safe in over 95% of well selected patients to provide a durable high quality of life. A very attractive alternative to these well established therapies is the endoscopic treatment of GERD, that employs different endoluminal technologic skills: plication of gastric cardia folds by suturing devices, radiofrequencies thermal-induced cardial fibrosis and bulking or sclerosing agents local injections have been recently tried and validated by different very experienced endoscopic groups. Although endoscopic therapy of GERD seems to be safe and feasible, a definite judgement awaits the results of multicentric controlled studies and longer periods of follow-up; for the present they must be restricted to well experienced endoscopists working to these controlled trials.     

Endoscopic treatment for atypical manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVES: Atypical manifestations are common in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the response of atypical manifestations of GERD to endoscopic antireflux treatment. METHODS: Patients with atypical manifestations of GERD including hoarseness, cough, wheezing, and non-cardiac chest pain were studied. Endoscopic antireflux treatment consisted of placement of sutures below the squamo-columnar junction. Clinical response was defined as complete resolution of the atypical symptom. Patients were followed clinically for up to 3 yr after the procedure. Short-term response was evaluated within 6 months of the procedure, and long-term follow-up was determined 1-3 yr after the procedure. RESULTS: Forty-three patients met the inclusion criteria; four patients underwent repeat procedures during the study period and were excluded from the analysis. Long-term follow-up was available in all 39 patients. Short-term response counts were: hoarseness, 12 of 19 patients, cough, 17 of 19; wheezing, 8 of 9; and chest pain, 13 of 18. Long-term follow-up of patients (mean of 18 months) for these symptoms was not significantly different compared to short-term response. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic suturing of the gastroesophageal junction appears to be a possible treatment option for atypical manifestations of GERD and future studies are needed to determine its role in management.     

Maintenance therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease

The aims of treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are to cure mucosal breaks, control symptoms, and prevent complications (e.g. stricture, Barrett’s esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are known to be the best drugs to cure esophagitis; however, a highrecurrence rate of about 80% was described after the completion of initial therapy. Regretfully, not so many physicians perform maintenance therapy in clinical practice. Histamine H2 receptor antagonists have an insufficient effect in maintenance therapy compared with PPIs; therefore, they could be prescribed for mild reflux esophagitis. Several clinical trials have been conducted to investigate the efficacy of continuous PPI administration maintenance therapy for GERD. Among these trials, recent large-scale studies showed that esomeprazole was equal to or superior to other kinds of PPIs. On the other hand, on-demand PPI studies have been conducted, mainly in patients with nonerosive reflux disease or uninvestigated GERD;however, this strategy was less effective than continuous therapy in many studies. Because on-demand therapy is less expensive, it is worth confirming this strategy in further studies. Studies of maintenance therapy with investigations conducted for as long a period as 5 years have described that PPI maintenance therapy could be considered as effective, safe, and well tolerated.