Pregabalin drug interaction studies: lack of effect on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine, phenytoin, lamotrigine, and valproate in patients with partial epilepsy

PURPOSE: Pregabalin (PGB) is an alpha2-delta ligand with demonstrated efficacy in epilepsy, neuropathic pain, and anxiety disorders. PGB is highly efficacious as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: Given its efficacy as adjunctive therapy, the potential for interaction of PGB with other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was assessed in patients with partial epilepsy in open-label, multiple-dose studies. Patients received PGB, 600 mg/day (200 mg q8h) for 7 days, in combination with their individualized maintenance monotherapy with valproate (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), lamotrigine (LTG), or carbamazepine (CBZ). RESULTS: Trough steady-state concentrations of CBZ (and its epoxide metabolite), PHT, LTG, and VPA were unaffected by concomitant PGB administration. Likewise, PGB steady-state pharmacokinetic parameter values were similar among patients receiving CBZ, PHT, LTG, or VPA and, in general, were similar to those observed historically in healthy subjects receiving PGB alone. The PGB-AED combinations were generally well tolerated. PGB may be added to VPA, LTG, PHT, or CBZ therapy without concern for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions.     

Differential effects of antiepileptic drugs on neonatal outcomes

Offspring of women with epilepsy (WWE) on AEDs are at increased risks for major congenital malformations and reduced cognition. They may be at risk for other adverse neonatal outcomes. Women with epilepsy on carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), phenytoin (PHT), or valproate (VPA) monotherapy were enrolled in a prospective, observational, multicenter study of the neurodevelopmental effects of AEDs. The odds ratio for small for gestational age (SGA) was higher for VPA vs. PHT, VPA vs. LTG, and CBZ vs. PHT. Microcephaly rates were elevated to 12% for all newborns and at 12 months old, but normalized by age 24 months. Reduced Apgar scores occurred more frequently in the VPA and PHT groups at 1 min, but scores were near normal in all groups at 5 min. This study demonstrates increased risks for being born SGA in the VPA and CBZ groups, and transiently reduced Apgar scores in the VPA and PHT groups. Differential risks among the AEDs can help inform decisions about AED selection for women during childbearing years.     

Effects of long-term antiepileptic drug monotherapy on vascular risk factors and atherosclerosis

Purpose: Long‐term therapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has been associated with metabolic consequences that lead to an increase in risk of atherosclerosis in patients with epilepsy. We compared the long‐term effects of monotherapy using different categories of AEDs on markers of vascular risk and the atherosclerotic process. Methods: One hundred sixty adult patients who were receiving AED monotherapy, including two enzyme‐inducers (carbamazepine, CBZ; and phenytoin, PHT), an enzyme‐inhibitor (valproic acid, VPA), and a noninducer (lamotrigine, LTG) for more than 2 years, and 60 controls were enrolled in this study. All study participants received measurement of common carotid artery (CCA) intima media thickness (IMT) by B‐mode ultrasonography to assess the extent of atherosclerosis. Other measurements included body mass index, and serum lipid profile or levels of total homocysteine (tHcy), folate, uric acid, fasting blood sugar, high sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP), or thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS). Key Findings: Long‐term monotherapy with older‐generation AEDs, including CBZ, PHT, and VPA, caused significantly increased CCA IMT in patients with epilepsy. After adjustment for the confounding effects of age and gender, the CCA IMT was found to be positively correlated with the duration of AED therapy. Patients with epilepsy who were taking enzyme‐inducing AED monotherapy (CBZ, PHT) manifested disturbances of cholesterol, tHcy or folate metabolism, and elevation of the inflammation marker, hs‐CRP. On the other hand, patients on enzyme‐inhibiting AED monotherapy (VPA) exhibited an increase in the levels of uric acid and tHcy, and elevation of the oxidative marker, TBARS. However, no significant alterations in the markers of vascular risk or CCA IMT were observed in patients who received long‐term LTG monotherapy. Significance: Patients with epilepsy who were receiving long‐term monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, or VPA exhibited altered circulatory markers of vascular risk that may contribute to the acceleration of the atherosclerotic process, which is significantly associated the duration of AED monotherapy. This information offers a guide for the choice of drug in patients with epilepsy who require long‐term AED therapy, particularly in aged and high‐risk individuals.     

Association between antiepileptic drug dose and long-term response in patients with refractory epilepsy

Seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy remain a substantial clinical challenge, not least because of the dearth of evidence-based guidelines as to which antiepileptic drug (AED) regimens are the most effective, and what doses of these drugs to employ. We sought to determine whether there were regions in the dosage range of commonly used AEDs that were associated with superior efficacy in patients with refractory epilepsy. We retrospectively analyzed treatment records from 164 institutionalized, developmentally disabled patients with refractory epilepsy, averaging 17 years of followup per patient. We determined the change in seizure frequency in within-patient comparisons during treatment with the most commonly used combinations of 12 AEDs, and then analyzed the response to treatment by quartile of the dose range for monotherapy with carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), valproate (VPA), or phenytoin (PHT), and the combination LTG/VPA. We found that of the 26 most frequently used AED regimens, only LTG/VPA yielded superior efficacy, similar to an earlier study. For the monotherapies, patients who were treated in the lowest quartile of the dose range had significantly better long-term reduction in seizure frequency compared to those treated in the 2nd and 3rd quartiles of the dose range. Patients with paired exposures to CBZ in both the lowest quartile and a higher quartile of dose range experienced an increase in seizure frequency at higher doses, while patients treated with LTG/VPA showed improved response with escalation of LTG dosage. We conclude that in this population of patients with refractory epilepsy, LTG/VPA was the most effective AED combination. The best response to AEDs used in monotherapy was observed at low dosage. This suggests that routine exposure to maximally tolerated AED doses may not be necessary to identify those patients with drug-resistant seizures who will have a beneficial response to therapy. Rather, responders to a given AED regimen may be identified with exposure to low AED doses, with careful evaluation of the response to subsequent titration to identify non-responders or those with exacerbation of seizure frequency at higher doses.     

Management issues for women with epilepsy—Focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): II. Teratogenesis and perinatal outcomes

A committee assembled by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) reassessed the evidence related to the care of women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy, including antiepileptic drug (AED) teratogenicity and adverse perinatal outcomes. It is highly probable that intrauterine first-trimester valproate (VPA) exposure has higher risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) compared to carbamazepine (CBZ), and possibly compared to phenytoin (PHT) or lamotrigine (LTG). It is probable that VPA as part of polytherapy and possible that VPA as monotherapy contribute to the development of MCMs. AED polytherapy probably contributes to the development of MCMs and reduced cognitive outcomes compared to monotherapy. Intrauterine exposure to VPA monotherapy probably reduces cognitive outcomes and monotherapy exposure to PHT or phenobarbital (PB) possibly reduces cognitive outcomes. Neonates of WWE taking AEDs probably have an increased risk of being small for gestational age and possibly have an increased risk of a 1-minute Apgar score of <7. If possible, avoidance of VPA and AED polytherapy during the first trimester of pregnancy should be considered to decrease the risk of MCMs. If possible, avoidance of VPA and AED polytherapy throughout pregnancy should be considered and avoidance of PHT and PB throughout pregnancy may be considered to prevent reduced cognitive outcomes.     

Estudio postautorización de la eslicarbazepina en el tratamiento de epilepsias farmacorresistentes: resultados preliminares

Introduction

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) and an analogue to carbamazepine (CBZ) and oxcarbazepine (OXC). In this study, we evaluate initial therapeutic response to ESL and events in the change from CBZ and OXC.

Methods

We evaluated 61 patients with a broad spectrum of drug-resistant epilepsies in a cross-sectional study. The switch from CBZ and OXC to ESL was carried out in a single night at ratios of 1:1.3 and 1:1 mg respectively.

Results

The most common form of epilepsy was temporal lobe epilepsy (62.3%). The most common aetiology was mesial temporal sclerosis (26.2%). Mean follow-up time was 4.7±3.2 months. In 40 patients with a minimum follow-up period of 3 months, monthly median seizure frequency dropped by 63.6% (P<.001) and a reduction of 80% or more was recorded in 30%. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 54%; all appeared during the titration phase. They were more frequent at doses in excess of 800 mg (73.9% vs. 47.4%; P=.042). The most common AE was dizziness (34.4%), which was commonly associated with VPA, LTG and/or LCS consumption (19.2% vs. 45.7%; P=.031). The retention rate at 3 months was 75.4%. A total of 25 patients replaced CBZ or OXC treatment with ESL; any AEs were transient (69.2% for CBZ and 33% for OXC; P=.073). At 3 months after the treatment change, median seizure frequency had decreased by 20% (P<.075).

Conclusions

ESL is effective in the treatment of focal epilepsies and its early retention rate is > 70%. AEs occurred during the titration phase and corresponded to associated AEDs. A rapid change from CBZ and OXC to ESL treatment can be safely performed.     

Seizure freedom with different therapeutic regimens in intellectually disabled epileptic patients.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a frequent condition in persons with intellectual disability and is more often difficult to treat than in the average population. Seizure freedom is the primary therapeutic goal which has important implications for the patient's quality of life. The aim of this study was to find out which antiepileptic therapy regimens (monotherapy or combination therapy) are effective in achieving this goal in intellectually disabled epilepsy patients. We were especially interested in the impact of the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) which were introduced during the past decade. METHOD: We investigated retrospectively the antiepileptic regimens on which the resident patients of a large epilepsy centre (as a rule with additional intellectual disabilities of different degrees) were seizure free in 2002. Information on antiepileptic medication and seizure frequency was taken out of the individual case documentation. It was also determined whether seizure free patients had already been seizure free in 1992. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty out of 675 patients (35,6%) with epilepsy were seizure free. The proportion of seizure freedom was 43,7% in patients with borderline intelligence, 39,2% in mild, 33,2% in moderate, 31,9% in severe, and 21,9% in profound intellectual disability. One hundred and twenty-two (50,8%) seizure free patients were on monotherapy; 53 of them were on CBZ (PB: 34, VPA: 25, PHT: 7, LTG: 3). Ninety-three patients (38,7%) were on duotherapies, CBZ/PB (27 patients), PB/PHT (17), and LTG/VPA (14) being the commonest. Of 18 (7,5%) triple therapies, LTG/PB/VPA (4 patients) was the commonest. Taken together, the five most frequent therapeutic regimens were CBZ monotherapy, PB monotherapy, CBZ/PB, VPA monotherapy and PB/PHT (a clear preponderance of classic AEDs). A distinction was made between "old seizure free" (seizure free already in 1992) and "new seizure free" (in 1992 still seizures) patients. In the 132 old seizure free patients the classic AEDs prevailed again, monotherapies with CBZ, PB and VPA being the most frequent regimens. In comparison, in the 78 new seizure free patients the novel combination LTG/VPA was the third most frequent, after the classic regimens CBZ/PB and CBZ; PB monotherapies were rare. CONCLUSION:In a majority of intellectually disabled patients with epilepsy (including those who became seizure free since 1992), complete seizure control has been achieved by monotherapy or duotherapy with classic AEDs. Of the new AEDs LTG in combination with VPA appears to be an important innovation.     

Effectiveness of First Antiepileptic Drug

PURPOSE: To investigate the interaction among efficacy, tolerability, and overall effectiveness of the first antiepileptic drug (AED) in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. METHODS: The 470 patients were diagnosed, treated and followed up from January 1984 at a single center. Outcome was classified as seizure freedom for at least the last year or failure of initial treatment because of inadequate seizure control, adverse events, or for other reasons. RESULTS: Overall, 47% of patients became seizure-free with the first prescribed AED. A higher proportion (p = 0.025) of patients with symptomatic or cryptogenic epilepsy changed treatment because of intolerable side effects (17%), and a lower proportion (p = 0.007) became seizure-free (43.5%) compared with those with idiopathic epilepsy (8.5% and 58%, respectively). Most patients (83%) received carbamazepine (CBZ; n = 212), sodium valproate (VPA; n = 101), or lamotrigine (LTG; n = 78). The majority of seizure-free patients required only a moderate daily AED dose (93.1% with < or =800 mg CBZ, 91.3% with < or =1,500 mg VPA, 93.8% with < or =300 mg LTG), with commonest dose ranges being 400-600 mg for CBZ, 600-1,000 mg for VPA, and 125-200 mg for LTG. Most withdrawals due to poor tolerability also occurred at or below these dose levels (CBZ: 98%; VPA: 100%; LTG: 75%). Patients taking CBZ (27%) had a higher incidence of adverse events necessitating a change of treatment than did those treated with VPA (13%) or LTG (10%), resulting in fewer becoming seizure-free (CBZ vs. VPA, p = 0.02; CBZ vs. LTG, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 50% of newly diagnosed patients became seizure-free on the first-ever AED, with >90% doing so at moderate or even modest dosing. Tolerability was as important as efficacy in determining overall effectiveness.     

The LAM-SAFE Study: Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine or valproic acid in newly diagnosed focal and generalised epilepsies in adolescents and adults

OBJECTIVE: To investigate efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (LTG) versus carbamazepine (CBZ) or valproic acid (VPA) in newly diagnosed focal (FE) and idiopathic generalised (GE) epilepsies in adolescents and adults. METHODS: Open-label randomised comparative multicentre 24-week monotherapy trial in newly diagnosed epilepsy patients of >or=12 years of age. Patients with FE were treated with LTG or CBZ, those with GE received LTG or VPA. The primary efficacy variable was the number of seizure-free patients during study weeks 17 and 24. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were included. One hundred and seventy-six patients suffered from FE and 63 from GE. In the FE group, 88 patients each were treated with CBZ or LTG. Ninety-four percent of the CBZ patients and 89% of the LTG patients became seizure-free according to an intent-to-treat analysis (not statistically different). The rate of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events or a lack of efficacy was 19% with CBZ compared to 9% with LTG (not statistically different). In the GE group, 30 patients received VPA and 33 LTG. During study weeks 17 and 24, 61% of the LTG patients and 84% of the VPA patients had become seizure-free (not statistically significant). The drop-out rate due to lack of efficacy or adverse events was 12% with LTG and 3% with VPA (not statistically different). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the effectiveness of LTG in focal and generalised epilepsy syndromes as initial monotherapy in patients >or=12 years is in the range of standard first-line antiepileptic drugs.     

Metabolic and hormonal disturbances in women with epilepsy on antiepileptic drug monotherapy

PURPOSE: Women with epilepsy (WWE) tend to have hormonal and metabolic abnormalities, raising concerns about an increased risk of cardiovascular disorders. This study was performed to determine whether epilepsy itself and/or antiepileptic drug (AED) medication cause metabolic abnormalities. METHODS: WWE in premenopausal state aged 18 to 45 years old, currently on AED monotherapy for more than six months, were recruited for this study. The subjects checked their oral temperature each morning, and tested serum levels for lipid profiles, insulin, glucose, and leptin. A HOMA-index was used as a marker for insulin resistance. RESULTS: Of the 54 total patients, 18 women were diagnosed with primary generalized epilepsy (PGE) and the other 36 were diagnosed with localization-related epilepsy (LRE). Among the subjects, 19 women were on carbamazepine (CBZ), 12 on valproate (VPA), 12 on lamotrigine (LTG), and 11 on topiramate (TPM). Body mass index increased and HDL-cholesterol decreased in patients on VPA monotherapy compared with CBZ, LTG, or TPM (p=0.046 and 0.002). Metabolic syndrome was more frequently associated with VPA-treated patients (41.7%) than CBZ (5.3%), LTG (0%), or TPM group (0%) (p=0.005). There were no differences in hormonal and metabolic indices between PGE and LRE groups. CONCLUSIONS: WWE on VPA monotherapy are more obese and more frequently suffer from metabolic syndrome. LTG or TPM may be safer when prescribed to the patients with high risk of cardiovascular disease.     

Self-reported symptoms in patients on antiepileptic drugs in monotherapy

Wieshmann UC, Tan GM, Baker G. Self‐reported symptoms in patients on antiepileptic drugs in monotherapy.
Acta Neurol Scand: 2011: 124: 355–358.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objective – To ascertain the frequency of self‐reported symptoms in patients taking antiepileptic drugs (AED). Methods – We included patients on carbamazepine (CBZ) n = 36, valproate (VPA) n = 21, levetiracetam (LEV) n = 12, phenytoin (PHT) n = 11, lamotrigine (LTG) n = 20, patients not taking anticonvulsive drugs n = 19, and healthy control subjects (CTRL) n = 41 to complete the Liverpool Adverse Event Profile (LAEP). Results – The mean LAEP scores were CBZ/PHT/LEV/VPA/LTG/noAED/CTRL = 44.97/42.00/41.00/40.33/32.42/42.00/30.80. LEV scored overall in the same range as the older AED but had a different adverse effect profile with self‐reported anger (33%) and shaky hands (42%) particularly frequent. Patients with depression or uncontrolled epilepsy had significantly higher LAEP scores than patients without depression or uncontrolled epilepsy. Conclusion – Our unblinded observational study of self‐reported symptoms suggested LTG was overall the drug with the least self‐reported symptoms. Larger studies are needed to determine whether this was a truly significant difference. LEV had a different side effect profile to older AED. Confounding factors were depression and uncontrolled epilepsy. This observation should be further tested with randomized studies.     

Lack of an effect of valproate concentration on lamotrigine pharmacokinetics in developmentally disabled patients with epilepsy

PURPOSE: to describe the population pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine (LTG) in developmentally disabled (DD) patients with epilepsy and (2) to determine if there is an effect of valproate (VPA) concentration on the extent of the pharmacokinetic interaction between VPA and LTG. METHOD: a NONMEM population analysis of steady-state LTG serum concentrations was conducted in patients receiving LTG either as mono or polytherapy with either an enzyme inducer (IND)-carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB) or an inhibitor (VPA). RESULTS: sixty-two patients (33.6+/-11.3 years, 47+/-9.9 kg) receiving LTG monotherapy (n=19) or polytherapy with VPA (n=15), inducer(s) (n=32) or both (n=5) were evaluated. LTG dose of 369+/-236 mg per day (8.1+/-5.9 mg/kg per day) achieved LTG plasma concentrations of 6.8+/-3.3 microg/ml. The observed LTG monotherapy, LTG+IND, and LTG+VPA oral clearance (Cl/F) were 0. 69+/-0.2, 1.60+/-0.65 and 0.2+/-0.05 ml/kg per min, respectively. The final LTG Cl/F model was dependent on body weight, concomitant VPA, and either single or multiple inducers. Including the serum concentrations of CBZ, PHT, or VPA in the model, did not significantly improve estimates of Cl/F. CONCLUSION: LTG Cl/F in DD patients is similar to literature values for ambulatory adult patients; however, low weight adult patients have higher elimination rates, as well as an increased response to enzyme induction. VPA inhibition of LTG Cl/F is maximal within the usually accepted therapeutic range for VPA.     

Positive and Negative Psychotropic Effects of Lamotrigine in Patients with Epilepsy and Mental Retardation

Summary: Purpose: To describe significant positive or negative psychotropic effects of lamotrigine (LTG) observed in epilepsy patients with mental retardation (MR).
Methods: Seven mentally retarded epilepsy patients, [5 with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS)] who experienced significant behavioral improvements or worsening after addition of LTG to their medication regimen were studied.
Results: LTG produced behavioral improvements in 4 patients. Patient 1, a 14-year-old girl, had LTG added to valproate (VPA) and thioridazine, resulting in diminished lethargy, less hyperactivity, and more appropriate speech. In a 17-year-old boy (patient 2) LTG added to VPA, phenytoin (PHT), and gabapentin (GBP) lessened irritability and hyperactivity. In patient 3, a 41-year-old woman, LTG added to PHT, VPA, and carbamazepine (CBZ) diminished lethargy and enhanced her social interactions. In patient 4, a 27-year-old man, LTG monotherapy diminished irritability and hyperactivity. Adverse behavioral effects were noted in 3 patients. In patient 5, a 43- year-old man, LTG added to PHT, phenobarbital (PB), lorazepam, sertraline, and thioridazine produced irritability, hyperactivity, and poor cooperation. In patient 6, a 29-year-old woman, LTG added to VPA produced frequent screaming, temper tantrums, increased rocking movements, and hyperactivity. In patient 7, a 29-year-old man, LTG added to VPA and PHT resulted in severe exacerbation of baseline behaviors, including self-injurious activity, temper tantrums, and failure to obey simple instructions.
Conclusions: In some patients with epilepsy and MR, LTG has significant positive or negative effects on behavior.     

Effects of lamotrigine on cognition and behavior compared to carbamazepine as monotherapy for children with partial epilepsy

To compare the cognitive and behavioral effects of lamotrigine (LTG) to carbamazepine (CBZ) as monotherapy for pediatric epilepsy. A multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted in children with partial-onset seizures. LTG or CBZ was prescribed as monotherapy for previously untreated children and titrated over 8 weeks, followed by maintenance for 24 weeks. Outcome measures were change in cognition and behavior in a combined analysis of standardized measures from screening to the end of the maintenance phase, as well as antiepileptic efficacy and tolerability. A total of 67 children completed the study, including 32 of 43 (74.4%) treated with LTG and 35 of 41 (85.4%) treated with CBZ. Seizure-free outcomes did not differ between the intent-to-treat populations (53.5% LTG, 56.1% CBZ; p = 0.81). There were no statistically significant differences in the intelligence of the two groups after treatment. Externalizing behavior problems improved in the CBZ group (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of externalizing behavior. The parents’ report on the Conner scale showed an improvement in the CBZ group compared to the LTG group (p < 0.05). LTG and CBZ showed similar efficacy and cognitive effects in treating childhood partial epilepsy. However, CBZ showed more benefits in improving externalizing behaviors.     

Antiepileptic drug-induced skin reactions: a retrospective study and analysis in 3793 Chinese patients with epilepsy

Objective

To evaluate the incidence and clinical characteristics of AED-related skin reactions, along with factors influencing these reactions, in a sample of 3793 Chinese epileptic patients.

Materials and methods

Between February 1999 and April 2010, consecutive patients with epilepsy were studied retrospectively. A detailed survey of each patient's medical records concerning all treatment with AEDs was performed.

Results

A total of 3793 (2323 male) Chinese epileptic patients taking at least one AED were investigated. Overall, 137/3793 (3.61%) patients experienced a skin reaction following one out of 11 different of AEDs marketed in China. In this study, we found skin reactions from carbamazepine (CBZ) in 3.80% of exposures, from lamotrigine (LTG) in 11.11%, and from oxcarbazepine (OXC) in 8.92%. Skin reactions developed significantly more often in females than in males (4.97% vs. 2.76%), and a logistic regression analysis confirmed female gender as a factor linked to AED-related rashes (OR = 1.84, p < 0.001). LTG-induced rashes were more frequent in girls under age 13 than in women over the age of 13 (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The incidence of skin reactions was somewhat higher for LTG, CBZ, and OXC, whereas valproic acid, levetiracetam, and topiramate were rarely associated with skin reactions. Caution should be exercised when prescribing certain AEDs, particularly CBZ, LTG, and OXC. Females have a higher risk for skin reactions compared to males, though further investigation is needed to discern the underlying mechanisms.     

Clinical Side Effects of Phenobarbital, Primidone, Phenytoin, Carbamazepine, and Valproate During Monotherapy in Children

The rate of onset of side effects was examined in 392 pediatric outpatients who received long-term monotherapy with phenobarbital (PB), primidone (PRM), phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), or valproate (VPA) for epilepsy or febrile convulsions. The severity of side effects (based on need to alter treatment), the nature of each drug's most common side effects, and the doses and plasma levels of occurrence were recorded. Our results show that usually accepted therapeutic ranges are well tolerated. Indeed, although some form of side effect occurred in 50% of patients, treatment had to be changed in only 18% and the drug had to be stopped in only 7%. In decreasing order, the rates for side effects were PHT (71%) greater than PB (64%) greater than CBZ (43%) greater than VPA (43%) greater than PRM (29%). Serious side effects requiring withdrawal of treatment occurred at the following rates: PHT (10%) greater than VPA (8%) greater than PRM (8%) greater than PB (4%) greater than CBZ (3%). Among our patients, the best tolerated antiepileptic drug (AED) was CBZ, and the least tolerated was PHT. Behavioral disorders were most common with PB, neurologic disorders with PHT, digestive tract disorders with VPA, and gingival hyperplasia and hirsutism with PHT. Behavioral disorders involving excitement seen with PB and PRM occurred most commonly at low plasma levels. Behavioral disorders involving depression seen with PB and VPA, those involving excitement seen with PHT and VPA, and digestive disorders seen with VPA occurred particularly when plasma levels were high.     

Pharmacological outcomes in newly diagnosed epilepsy

The response to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has been examined in 780 adult and adolescent patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy presenting with a range of seizure types and epilepsy syndromes over a 20-year period. Carbamazepine (CBZ, n=312), sodium valproate (VPA, n=315), and lamotrigine (LTG, n=249) were the most common AEDs prescribed as monotherapy. More patients with localization-related epilepsies became seizure free with LTG (63%) than with CBZ (45%, P=0.006) or VPA (42%, P=0.006). For idiopathic generalized epilepsies a greater proportion of patients achieved control with VPA (68%) than with CBZ (31%) or LTG (45%). In particular, more patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy responded to VPA (75%) compared with LTG (39%, P=0.014). Seizure freedom was achieved with modest or moderate daily doses (median CBZ 400mg, VPA 1000 mg, (LTG) 150 mg) of all three AEDs in the majority of patients achieving remission. Time to first seizure did not differ among these three drugs when given as first treatment. Adverse effects leading to withdrawal were more frequent with CBZ (16%) than with VPA (7%, P=0.03) or LTG (7%, P=0.018). In patients failing initial monotherapy, response to a combination of two AEDs (27%) was not different from that with alternative monotherapy (32%). The majority of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy responding to treatment did so rapidly and completely with moderate doses of AEDs, with no differences in time to first seizure.     

Clinical Pharmacology of Lamotrigine

Summary: The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lamotrigine (LTG), a new antiepileptic drug (AED), were studied in healthy volunteers. In an open dose-escalating study, LTG 240 mg produced peak plasma concentrations of around 3 μg/mg with no significant adverse events. Subsequent pharmacokinetic studies revealed complete oral absorption, first-order kinetics with a mean half-life of approximately 1 day, and elimination mainly as a glucuronide in the urine. Early studies in patients with epilepsy revealed more rapid metabolism when given with enzyme-inducing AEDs and delayed metabolism by valproate. A placebo-controlled, double-blind study compared LTG 120 and 240 mg with phenytoin (PHT) 500 and 1,000 mg, and diazepam (DZP) 10 mg. Visual analogue scales showed sedation after PHT 1,000 mg and DZP 10 mg, but not after LTG. Smooth pursuit eye movements and adaptive tracking were impaired by DZP and PHT 1,000 mg. LTG did not affect these variables. A comparison of LTG 150 and 300 mg and carbamazepine (CBZ) 200, 400, and 600 mg demonstrated impairment of smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements by CBZ 600 and 400 mg, but not by LTG. Additionally, CBZ 600 mg impaired adaptive tracking and increased body sway and heart rate. These studies have shown LTG to have desirable and predictable pharmacokinetic properties for an AED. Pharmacodynamic effects were absent, suggesting a high therapeutic index.