Pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir and TMC125 alone and coadministered in HIV-negative volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of TMC125 (etravirine) and darunavir (DRV) with low-dose ritonavir (DRV/r). DESIGN: Open-label, randomized, two-way crossover Phase I trial. METHODS: Thirty-two HIV-negative volunteers were randomized 1:1 to two panels. All received TMC125 100 mg twice daily for 8 days and, after 14 days washout, DRV/r 600/100 mg twice daily for 16 days. During days 9-16, TMC125 100 or 200 mg twice daily was coadministered (Panel I or II, respectively). RESULTS: Twenty-three volunteers completed the trial. With DRV/r coadministration, mean exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h [AUC12h) to TMC125 given as 100 mg twice daily was decreased by 37%; maximum and minimum plasma concentrations (Cmax and Cmin) were decreased by 32% and 49%, respectively. For TMC125 200 mg twice daily coadministered with DRV/r, AUC12h, Cmax and Cmin of TMC125 were 80%, 81% and 67% greater, respectively, versus TMC125 100 mg twice daily alone. DRV pharmacokinetics were unchanged except a 15% increase in AUC12h when given with TMC125 200 mg twice daily. CONCLUSIONS: No clinically relevant changes in DRV pharmacokinetics were observed when combined with TMC125; therefore DRV dose adjustment is not required. Coadministration of TMC125 100 mg twice daily with DRV/r decreased TMC125 exposure by 37%. The increase of TMC125 exposure by 80% when given as 200 mg twice daily reflects the higher dose and the interaction with DRV/r. The magnitude of this interaction is comparable to TMC125 interactions with other boosted PIs observed in Phase IIb trials in HIV-1-infected patients. As these trials demonstrated TMC125 efficacy, no dose adjustment of TMC125 is needed when combined with DRV/r.     

Darunavir, ritonavir, and etravirine pharmacokinetics in the cervicovaginal fluid and blood plasma of HIV-infected women

We report darunavir, ritonavir, and etravirine pharmacokinetics in cervicovaginal fluid and blood plasma for women from the Gender, Race and Clinical Experience (GRACE) study. Eight women received darunavir-ritonavir (600/100 mg) twice daily (b.i.d.); two also received etravirine (200 mg) b.i.d. Week 4 paired blood plasma and cervicovaginal fluid samples were collected over 12 h. Darunavir and etravirine cervicovaginal fluid exposures were higher than blood plasma exposures; ritonavir cervicovaginal fluid exposure was lower than blood plasma exposure. The high exposures of darunavir and etravirine in cervicovaginal fluid warrant further evaluation of these drugs for use in HIV-1 prevention.     

Comparison of the multiple dose pharmacokinetics of two formulations of itraconazole during remission induction for acute myeloblastic leukaemia.

This double-blind cross-over study compares the serum pharmacokinetics of a polyethylene glycol formulation of itraconazole (ITRA-PEG; 4 x 50 mg once daily) with a new pelleted formulation (ITRA-PEL; 2 x 100 mg once daily) during remission induction for acute myeloblastic leukaemia. Each formulation was administered for 28 days with a seven day washout period. Five of eight patients (median age 52 years, range 18-65) entering completed both arms of the study. At day 7 for ITRA-PEL (n = 8) the mean +/- one standard deviation and median maximum concentrations (Cmax) were 307 +/- 155 ng/mL and 275 ng/mL respectively and for ITRA-PEG (n = 6) 272 +/- 212 ng/mL and 193 ng/mL. At day 14 for ITRA-PEL (n = 8) the mean +/- S.D. and median Cmax were 412 +/- 227 ng/mL and 375 ng/mL respectively and for ITRA-PEG (n = 5), 315 +/- 177 ng/mL and 327 ng/mL. The Cmax mean and median values were therefore greater with ITRA-PEL but the differences between the two formulations were not statistically significant. Adequate therapeutic levels of itraconazole can be achieved in this clinical setting. However, the wide variation within and between patients suggests that an ITRA-PEL dosage of 400 mg/day may ensure earlier and more consistent therapeutic levels. Measurement of serum levels may be indicated in suspected failure of prophylaxis or treatment.     

Pharmacokinetics of Stavudine and Didanosine Coadministered with Nelfinavir in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Exposed Neonates

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of stavudine (d4T) and didanosine (ddI) in neonates. Eight neonates born to human immunodeficiency virus-infected mothers were enrolled to receive 1 mg of d4T per kg of body weight twice daily and 100 mg of ddI per m(2) once daily in combination with nelfinavir for 4 weeks after birth. Pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed at 14 and 28 days of age. For d4T, on days 14 and 28, the median areas under the concentration-time curves from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)s) were 1,866 and 1,603, ng x h/ml, respectively, and the median peak concentrations (C(max)s) were 463 and 507 ng/ml, respectively. For ddI, on days 14 and 28, the median AUC(0-10)s were 1,573 and 1,562 h x ng/ml, respectively, and the median C(max)s were 627 and 687 ng/ml, respectively. Systemic levels of exposure to d4T were comparable to those seen in children, suggesting that the pediatric dose of 1 mg/kg twice daily is appropriate for neonates at 2 to 4 weeks of age. Levels of exposure to ddI were modestly higher than those seen in children. Whether this observation warrants a reduction of the ddI dose in neonates is unclear.     

Pharmacokinetics of sustained and immediate release formulations of indapamide after single and repeated oral administration in healthy volunteers

The pharmacokinetics of a 2.5 mg immediate release (IR) formulation of indapamide was compared to a 1.5 mg sustained release (SR) formulation of indapamide after single and repeated oral administration dose using double blind randomised cross-over studies. In the first study, 12 subjects received a single dose of each treatment: IR fasted, SR fasted or with food. In the second study one tablet of either formulation was administered daily for one week at breakfast. In each study, blood samples were collected pre dose (Cmin) and up to 120 h after the last dose. Urine was collected over the dosing interval (24 h). Following a single oral administration the SR formulation had a lower dose-normalised Cmax compared to the IR formulation (17.6 +/- 6.3 vs. 39.3 +/- 11.0 ng x mL(-1), respectively), a much longer t(max) (12.3 +/- 0.4 vs. 0.8 +/- 0.3 h) and a greater t75 (15.3 +/- 6.1 vs. 1.8 +/- 1.4 h) but there were no differences in dose-normalised AUC (559 +/- 125 and 564 +/- 146 ng x h x mL(-1)) nor in t(1/2z) values (14.8 +/- 2.8 vs. 18.4 +/- 13.4 h). The SR formulation clearly demonstrated sustained release characteristics as compared to the IR formulation. Food co-administration had no effect on dose-normalised AUC for the SR formulation. After repeated administration, steady-state was achieved by day 5. The absorption rate of the SR formulation was lower and the 24 h peak-to-trough fluctuation was 4-fold lower compared to the IR formulation. After dose correction there wasno change in AUC, (726 +/- 207 and 690 +/- 183 ng x mL(-1) x h for SR and IR, respectively). The elimination parameters (t(1,2z), Ae(tau), and CLr) remained unchanged. The SR formulation showed sustained release of indapamide with a reduction in peak concentration, while steady-state level was not affected by formulations. The two formulations have the same bioavailability.     

Pharmacokinetic interactions of maraviroc with darunavir-ritonavir, etravirine, and etravirine-darunavir-ritonavir in healthy volunteers: results of two drug interaction trials

The effects of darunavir-ritonavir at 600 and 100 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) alone, 200 mg of etravirine b.i.d. alone, or 600 and 100 mg of darunavir-ritonavir b.i.d. with 200 mg etravirine b.i.d. at steady state on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of maraviroc, and vice versa, in healthy volunteers were investigated in two phase I, randomized, two-period crossover studies. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Coadministration of 150 mg maraviroc b.i.d. with darunavir-ritonavir increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC12) for maraviroc 4.05-fold relative to 150 mg of maraviroc b.i.d. alone. Coadministration of 300 mg maraviroc b.i.d. with etravirine decreased the maraviroc AUC12 by 53% relative to 300 mg maraviroc b.i.d. alone. Coadministration of 150 mg maraviroc b.i.d. with etravirine-darunavir-ritonavir increased the maraviroc AUC12 3.10-fold relative to 150 mg maraviroc b.i.d. alone. Maraviroc did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of etravirine, darunavir, or ritonavir. Short-term coadministration of maraviroc with darunavir-ritonavir, etravirine, or both was generally well tolerated, with no safety issues reported in either trial. Maraviroc can be coadministered with darunavir-ritonavir, etravirine, or etravirine-darunavir-ritonavir. Maraviroc should be dosed at 600 mg b.i.d. with etravirine in the absence of a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) (i.e., a boosted protease inhibitor) or at 150 mg b.i.d. when coadministered with darunavir-ritonavir with or without etravirine.     

Pharmacokinetic profile and tolerability of indinavir-ritonavir combinations in healthy volunteers

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel study in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-uninfected healthy subjects to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction between indinavir (IDV) and ritonavir (RTV). Subjects were allocated to treatment groups of IDV given with RTV in the following milligram doses twice daily: 800 mg of IDV-100 mg of RTV (800-100 mg), 800-200, 800-400, and 400-400 mg, placebo of IDV with RTV doses of 100, 200, and 400 mg, and placebo of both IDV and RTV. Doses of both drugs were administered for 14 days with a low-fat meal and one dose on day 15 with a high-fat meal. Blood was obtained for drug concentration measurements on days 14 and 15. Seventy-three volunteers enrolled in the study: 29 men and 44 women. Fifty-three volunteers completed the study. When compared to standard historical data for 800 mg of IDV every 8 h (q8h), the IDV area under the concentration-time curve for 24 h (AUC(24)) of IDV-RTV regimens 400-400, 800-100, and 800-200 mg were at least 1.4, 2.3, and 3.3 times higher, respectively, regardless of meal. The concentrations at the end of the dosing interval were 10 to 25 times higher than that observed in the standard regimen of 800 mg of IDV q8h for IDV-RTV 800-100 and 800-200 mg regimens, respectively. RTV at 200 mg maximally enhanced the IDV profile. Improved tolerability was associated with IDV-RTV 800-100 mg versus IDV-RTV 800-200, 800-400, and 400-400 mg q12h. The advantages of IDV-RTV twice daily over 800 mg of IDV q8h include no food restrictions and twice-daily dosing. Also, the regimens achieve levels of IDV that may be helpful in suppressing strains of HIV-1 that have reduced susceptibility to IDV or other protease inhibitors.     

Amprenavir and lopinavir pharmacokinetics following coadministration of amprenavir or fosamprenavir with lopinavir/ritonavir, with or without efavirenz

BACKGROUND: Amprenavir (APV), fosamprenavir (FPV), lopinavir (LPV), ritonavir (RTV) and efavirenz (EFV) are to varying degrees substrates, inducers and inhibitors of CYP3A4. Coadministration of these drugs might result in complex pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. METHODS: Two prospective, open-label, non-randomized studies evaluated APV and LPV steady-state pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected patients on APV 750 mg twice daily + LPV/RTV 533/133 mg twice daily with EFV (n=7) or without EFV (n=12) + background nucleosides (Study 1) and after switching FPV 1,400 mg twice daily for APV (n=10) (Study 2). RESULTS: In Study 1 EFV and non-EFV groups did not differ in APV minimum plasma concentration (Cmin; 1.10 versus 1.06 microg/ml, P = 0.89), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC; 17.46 versus 24.34 microg x h/ml, P = 0.22) or maximum concentration (Cmax; 2.61 versus 4.33 microg/ml, P = 0.08); for LPV there was no difference in Cmin, (median: 3.66 versus 6.18 microg/ml, P = 0.20), AUC (81.84 versus 93.75 microg x h/ml, P = 0.37) or Cmax (10.36 versus 10.93 microg/ml, P = 0.61). In Study 2, after switching from APV to FPV, APV Cmin increased by 58% (0.83 versus 1.30 microg/ml, P = 0.0001), AUC by 76% (19.41 versus 34.24 micorg x h/ml, P = 0.0001), and Cmax by 75% (3.50 versus 6.14, P = 0.001). Compared with historical controls, LPV and RTV pharmacokinetics were not changed. All treatment regimens were well tolerated. Seven of eight completers (88%) maintained HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/ml 12 weeks after the switch (1 lost to follow up). CONCLUSIONS: EFV did not appear to significantly alter APV and LPV pharmacokinetic parameters in HIV-infected patients taking APV 750 mg twice daily + LPV 533/133 mg twice daily. Switching FPV 1400 mg twice daily for APV 750 mg twice daily resulted in an increase in APV Cmin, AUC, and Cmax without changing LPV or RTV pharmacokinetics or overall tolerability.     

Pharmacokinetics of itraconazole following oral administration to normal volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics of itraconazole, an orally effective, broad-spectrum, systemic antifungal agent, were evaluated in five healthy male volunteers. Each subject was studied on days 1 and 15 at the following dosages: 100 mg once daily (regimen A), 200 mg once daily (regimen B), and 200 mg twice daily (regimen C). On each study day, itraconazole was administered with a standardized meal. Plasma samples were collected for 72 h postdose, and 24-h urine specimens were obtained. On day 1 of regimen C, plasma samples were collected following the second dose. Samples were assayed for itraconazole by a sensitive, reverse-phase, high-performance liquid chromatography method. Wide intersubject variations in itraconazole concentration in plasma versus time profiles were observed on all study days. Absorption appeared to be slow, with day 1 mean peak itraconazole concentrations in plasma of 110 ng/ml at 2.8 h (regimen A), 272 ng/ml at 3.0 h (regimen B), and 553 ng/ml at 3.4 h (regimen C). Mean peak itraconazole concentrations in plasma on day 15 were 412 ng/ml at 3.0 h (regimen A), 1,070 ng/ml at 4.4 h (regimen B), and 1,980 ng/ml at 6.0 h (regimen C). The steady state was achieved by day 13. Respective elimination half-lives on days 1 and 15 were 15 and 34 h (regimen A), 20.7, and 36.5 h (regimen B), and 25 and 41.7 h (regimen C), respectively. The areas under the plasma concentration versus time curves (0 to infinity) on day 1 were 1,320 (regimen A), 4,160 (regimen B), and 12,600 ng.h/ml (regimen C). With the exception of one patient on day 15 of regimen C, itraconazole was not detected in the urine. All data support dose-dependent pharmacokinetic behavior for itraconazole.     

Saquinavir 500 mg film-coated tablets demonstrate bioequivalence to saquinavir 200 mg hard capsules when boosted with twice-daily ritonavir in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To establish the bioequivalence of a 500 mg film-coated tablet of saquinavir mesylate (FCT SQV) to the 200 mg hard-capsule saquinavir mesylate (HC SQV), both boosted with ritonavir and administered under fed conditions. METHODS: We carried out a multi-centre, open-label, randomized, two-sequence, four-period, two-treatment, replicated crossover study in 93 healthy men and 7 healthy women. Individuals were randomly assigned to receive sequential single doses of saquinavir in one of two treatment sequences: ABAB or BABA. Individuals received 100 mg ritonavir twice daily for 24 days. On days 14,17, 20 and 23, study participants took 1000 mg of HC SQV (five 200 mg capsules, treatment A) or FCT SQV (two 500 mg tablets, treatment B) with a high-fat, high-calorie breakfast, and pharmacokinetic analyses were carried out over the next 24 hours. Area under the saquinavir concentration-time curve (AUC0-alpha), maximum saquinavir plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax and terminal half-life were calculated. The relative bioavailability of FCT SOV versus HC SQV was calculated as the ratio of the respective estimated mean saquinavir AUC0-alpha and Cmax. The calculation was based on an ANOVA including the factors site, sex, sequence, period, treatment and study participant to the log-transformed parameters log(AUC0-alpha) and log(Cmax); the relative bioavailability and the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using the treatment contrasts of the ANOVA. Bioequivalence was concluded as for both parameters, AUC0-alpha and Cmax, the 90% CIs for the relative bioavailability were entirely included in the reference region [0.80-1.25]. RESULTS: Saquinavir plasma concentration-time profiles for the two formulations were similar. Geometric mean AUC0-alpha and Cmax values were clearly increased for FCT SQV (26 826 versus 24 430 h*ng/ml; and 3644 versus 3064 ng/ml, respectively); ratios of mean exposures were estimated to be 1.10 for AUC0-alpha and 1.19 for Cmax of saquinavir. However, the corresponding two-sided 90% CIs (1.04-1.16 and 1.14-1.25, respectively) all fell within the limits set for equivalence (0.80, 1.25). The adverse event profile for FCT SQV was similar to that for HC SQV. CONCLUSION: The new 500 mg FCT SQV formulation is bioequivalent to the 200 mg HC SQV formulation, at the dose of 1000 mg, in combination with 100 mg ritonavir under fed conditions. The 500 mg FCT SQV formulation reduces pill count for boosted saquinavir (SQV/r) from six capsules to three tablets twice daily. This may increase patient acceptability of SQV/r, particularly in less treatment-experienced patients.     

Pharmacokinetics of reduced-dose indinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily in HIV-1-infected Thai patients

OBJECTIVE: To study the pharmacokinetics of indinavir/ ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily in antiretroviral-naive patients at Srinagarind Hospital in Khon Kaen, Thailand. METHODS: This was a steady-state, open-label pharmacokinetic study of 19 patients. A 12 h pharmacokinetic curve was recorded after an overnight fast. Plasma levels of indinavir and ritonavir were determined by a validated HPLC method. Virological failure was defined according to the most recent US Department of Health and Human Services guidelines as a viral load above 400 copies/ml at week 24. RESULTS: Median baseline values for CD4 and viral load were 13cells/mm3 and 167000 copies/ml, respectively. The median (interquartile ranges) for indinavir AUC, Cmax and Cmin were 18.1 (15.3-23.8) mg/l x h, 4.1 (3.6-4.8) mg/l and 0.17 (0.12-0.30) mg/l, respectively. These values represent 37%, 39% and 24% of the AUC, Cmax and Cmin values found, respectively, for the indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg dose in HIV-1-infected Thai patients. Short-term virological response was satisfactory. There were three subjects with an indinavir Cmin. below the target value of 0.10 mg/l, of whom one had virological failure (33%). Among the other 16 subjects with an indinavir Cmin above 0.10 mg/l, there was also one virological failure (6%) (P=0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Indinavir exposure in this reduced-dose regimen of 400 mg with 100 mg ritonavir twice daily was more than dose-proportionally lower than previously observed with the indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg twice daily regimen. Therapeutic Cmin levels of indinavir were achieved in >80% of the subjects and short-term virological response was satisfactory in this cohort of patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy at an advanced disease stage with high baseline viral loads.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor etravirine in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the antiretroviral agent etravirine were evaluated in two phase III clinical trials. Pharmacokinetic data were available in 577 patients randomized to receive etravirine. The mean (SD) population-pharmacokinetics-derived area under the concentration-time curve at 12?h (AUC(12?h)) and concentration at 0?h (C(0?h)) were 5,501?(4,544) ng·h/ml and 393?(378) ng/ml, respectively. Hepatitis C coinfection raised etravarine exposure, and concomitant use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate lowered etravirine exposure, but these changes were not considered clinically relevant. Etravirine apparent oral clearance was not affected by age, weight, sex, race, hepatitis B coinfection status, creatinine clearance, or concomitant use of enfuvirtide. Virologic response (<50?copies/ml) at week 24 was 59% in patients randomized to etravirine vs. 41% in those receiving placebo (P < 0.0001). There was no apparent relationship between etravirine pharmacokinetics and either efficacy or safety. Factors other than the pharmacokinetics of etravirine such as the characteristics of the patients and the disease, as well as characteristics of the treatment regimen, predict virologic response.     

Pharmacokinetics and short-term safety of 873140, a novel CCR5 antagonist, in healthy adult subjects

873140 is a novel CCR5 antagonist with potent in vitro anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) activity. This study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single- and repeat-dose escalation investigation of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and food effect of 873140 in 70 adult subjects. During single-dose escalation, three cohorts (each composed of 10 subjects, with 8 subjects receiving the active drug and 2 subjects receiving the placebo [8 active and 2 placebo]) received doses of 50, 200, 400, 800, and 1,200 mg after an overnight fast, or 400 mg plus a standard high-fat breakfast in an alternating panel design. During repeat-dose escalation, four cohorts (each with 8 active and 2 placebo) received doses of 200, 400, 600, or 800 mg every 12 h (BID) for 8 days. Laboratory safety tests, vital signs, and electrocardiograms (ECGs) were performed at regular intervals, and blood samples were obtained for pharmacokinetics. Single and repeat doses of 50 mg to 800 mg were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events and no grade 3 or 4 adverse events. The mild-to-moderate side effects were primarily gastrointestinal and included abdominal cramping, nausea, and diarrhea. No specific trends in laboratory parameters or clinically significant ECG changes were noted. Plasma 873140 concentrations increased rapidly; the median time to maximum concentration of drug in serum was 1.75 to 5 h. The median area under the plasma concentration-time profile (AUC) and the maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)) ranged from 127 ng.h/ml and 24 ng/ml at 200 mg BID to 329 ng.h/ml and 100 ng/ml at 800 mg BID, respectively. Food consumption increased the AUC and C(max) by a mean of 1.7- and 2.2-fold, respectively. The pharmacokinetic and safety profile supports the continued investigation of 873140 with HIV-infected subjects.     

Pharmacokinetics of once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected subjects: comparison with the standard twice-daily regimen

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and safety of two once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/RTV) regimens, 1600/100 and 2000/100 mg, in HIV-positive patients. METHODS: Eighteen HIV-infected adults treated with the standard twice-daily SQV/RTV 1000/100 mg regimen were enrolled in this open-label, two-phase, crossover pharmacokinetic study. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of SQV administered with 100 mg RTV were investigated following once-daily doses of 1600 mg or 2000 mg or a twice-daily dose of 1000 mg. Plasma drug concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental model. RESULTS: Compared with SQV 1000 mg twice daily, the Cmax of SQV following a 1600 mg and 2000 mg dose increased in a dose-proportional manner [geometric mean (95% CI) 1915 (1656-2850) ng/ml for 1000 mg, 2782 (2249-4330) ng/ml for 1600 mg and 4179 (3429-6105) ng/ml for 2000 mg doses, respectively]. SQV Ctrough values were 539 (453-1011), 106 (76-223) and 231 (75-822) ng/ml, respectively. A SQV Ctrough value greater than 100 ng/ml was achieved in all subjects on the twice-daily regimen, in 9/18 (50%) subjects on the 1600/100 mg once-daily regimen, and in 14/17 (82%) subjects on the 2000/100 mg once-daily regimen. The once-daily regimens were well tolerated, with mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal symptoms being the only events reported by a small number of patients. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of once-daily SQV/RTV 2000/100 mg in HIV-infected subjects. Our findings suggest that this regimen may be an alternative to twice-daily 1000/100 mg doses and should be further evaluated in efficacy studies. The data indicate that most patients (14/17) on once-daily 2000/100 mg achieve trough concentrations above target values (determined for HIV wild-type) for efficacy of SQV with the use of just 100 mg RTV/day and with good tolerability.     

Exploratory study comparing the metabolic toxicities of a lopinavir/ritonavir plus saquinavir dual protease inhibitor regimen versus a lopinavir/ritonavir plus zidovudine/lamivudine nucleoside regimen

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety, efficacy and metabolic toxicity of lopinavir/ritonavir + saquinavir or zidovudine/lamivudine and evaluate the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir + saquinavir. METHODS: HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral-naive subjects were randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg) twice daily + saquinavir (800 mg) or zidovudine/lamivudine (150/300 mg) in a Phase II, 48 week study. Subjects receiving lopinavir/ritonavir + zidovudine/lamivudine initiated escalating doses of saquinavir (400, 600 and 800 mg) weekly for 3 weeks. RESULTS: By intent-to-treat (non-completer = failure) analysis, 10/16 (63%) lopinavir/ritonavir + saquinavir-treated and 7/14 (50%) lopinavir/ritonavir + zidovudine/lamivudine-treated subjects achieved plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (P=0.713) at week 48. Safety, tolerability, metabolic changes and truncal fat increases were similar between groups. Small decreases in the lower extremity fat in the zidovudine/lamivudine group (-6%) and a statistically significant increase in the lower extremity fat in the saquinavir group (+19%) were observed. Lopinavir/ritonavir co-administered with saquinavir 600 or 800 mg twice daily produced saquinavir concentrations similar to those previously reported for saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg twice daily. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment regimens had similar efficacy and tolerability. Metabolic parameters suggested lipoatrophy in the zidovudine/lamivudine treatment group. Saquinavir 600 and 800 mg twice daily produced concentrations similar to those previously reported for saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg twice daily.     

Effect of a new quinolone, sparfloxacin, on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline in asthmatic patients.

Recently, it has become evident that some quinolones affect the processing of theophylline in the human system. The effect of a new quinolone, sparfloxacin, on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of theophylline was investigated in six asthmatic patients receiving chronic theophylline therapy (a sustained-release theophylline tablet formulation of 200 to 300 mg twice daily at 12-h intervals). To these patients, sparfloxacin (200 mg once daily) was coadministered for 1 week. Plasma and urine samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography for theophylline and its metabolites. Plasma theophylline concentration-time curves and the urinary excretion of theophylline and its major metabolites before and after coadministration of sparfloxacin were compared. The total body clearance of theophylline after coadministration of sparfloxacin, 42.81 +/- 6.64 ml/h/kg (mean +/- standard error of the mean), was not significantly different from that after the administration of theophylline alone, 47.11 +/- 7.61 ml/h/kg. Also, no significant change in the urinary excretion of theophylline and its metabolites was observed for subjects receiving or not receiving sparfloxacin. These findings indicate that a once-daily dose of 200 mg of sparfloxacin has no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of theophylline and that it would be safe to coadminister this quinolone to asthmatic patients receiving chronic theophylline therapy.     

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of oral pirmenol

The efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of pirmenol, a class Ia antiarrhythmic agent, were studied in patients with frequent symptomatic premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). Pirmenol was given every 12 hours to eight patients in a dose-ranging protocol, and median PVC suppression of 94% (range 72% to 100%) was achieved. The median effective pirmenol dose was 300 mg/day (range 200 to 500 mg/day), and mean (+/- SD) trough plasma pirmenol concentration at the effective dose was 0.98 +/- 0.29 micrograms/ml. The mean half-life of elimination was 10.5 +/- 2 hours. There was considerable overlap among patients with respect to plasma pirmenol concentration and times at which PVC frequency returned to 25%, 50%, and 75% of baseline during drug washout trials. Altering pirmenol's dose interval (while maintaining a constant daily dose) from 12 to 6 hours did not improve drug efficacy. Pirmenol was given to seven patients for long-term therapy (24 to 44 months). Median PVC suppression at 24 months was 70%. Pirmenol is safe and well tolerated, and it can be administered twice daily for PVC suppression.     

Pharmacokinetics of saquinavir plus low-dose ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus-infected pregnant women

The physiologic changes that occur during pregnancy make it difficult to predict antiretroviral pharmacokinetics (PKs), but few data exist on the PKs of protease inhibitors in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected pregnant women. The objective of the present study was to determine the PKs of ritonavir (RTV)-enhanced saquinavir (SQV) in HIV-infected pregnant women by an area under the curve (AUC)-targeted approach. A phase I, formal PK evaluation was conducted with HIV-infected pregnant woman during gestation, during labor and delivery, and at 6 weeks postpartum. The SQV-RTV regimen was 800/100 mg twice a day (b.i.d.), and nucleoside analogs were administered concomitantly. The SQV exposure targeted was an AUC at 24 h of 10,000 ng. h/ml. Participants were evaluated for 12-h steady-state PKs at each time period. Thirteen subjects completed the PK evaluations during gestation, 7 completed the PK evaluations at labor and delivery, and 12 completed the PK evaluations postpartum. The mean baseline weight was 67.4 kg, and the median length of gestation was 23.3 weeks. All subjects achieved SQV exposures in excess of the target AUC. The SQV AUCs at 12 h (AUC(12)s) during gestation (29,373 +/- 17,524 ng. h/ml [mean +/- standard deviation]), during labor and delivery (26,189 +/- 22,138 ng. h/ml), and during the postpartum period (35,376 +/- 26,379 ng. h/ml) were not significantly different. The mean values of the PK parameters for RTV were lower during gestation than during the postpartum period: for AUC(12), 7,811 and 13,127 ng. h/ml, respectively; for trough concentrations, 376 and 632 ng/ml, respectively; and for maximum concentrations, 1,256 and 2,252 ng/ml, respectively (P 相似文献   

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of saquinavir in pediatric patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate the clinical pharmacologic characteristics of saquinavir given as a soft gelatin capsule, either alone or in combination with nelfinavir, to children and adolescents with human immunodeficiency virus infection. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of 50 mg/kg saquinavir 3 times a day (tid) alone versus 33 mg/kg saquinavir tid plus 30 mg/kg nelfinavir tid was assessed after single-dose administration and after short- and long-term administration. The single-dose pharmacokinetics of fixed (1200 mg) versus unrestricted weight-adjusted dosing (50 mg/kg) was also investigated. RESULTS: Saquinavir as the sole protease inhibitor resulted in lower saquinavir exposure in children (steady-state geometric mean area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours [AUC (0-24 h)], 5790 ng x h/ml; steady-state concentration 8 hours after drug administration [C(8h,SS)], 65 ng/ml) and adolescents [steady-state geometric mean AUC(0-24 h), 5914 ng x h/ml] than that reported in adults treated with 1200 mg tid [steady-state geometric mean AUC(0-24 h), 21,700 ng x h/ml; C(8h,SS), 223 ng/ml]. This finding appeared to be attributable to markedly higher apparent oral clearance, potentially as a result of increased systemic clearance and reduced oral bioavailability. Nelfinavir combined with saquinavir reduced apparent oral clearance, increasing saquinavir exposure in children [steady-state geometric mean AUC(0-24 h), 11,070 ng x h/ml; C(8h,SS), 380 ng/ml] to levels that approach those observed in adults. A significant correlation between average trough concentration and sustained viral load suppression was observed in children. The apparent threshold for maintaining viral load suppression was a mean trough saquinavir concentration above 200 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of saquinavir in children is different from that of adults, and administration of saquinavir alone will not give consistently efficacious plasma levels. The best way of improving saquinavir exposure in children is through combination therapy with other protease inhibitors that inhibit saquinavir metabolism.